View
7
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
PIAT FIRE STATION
I. GENERAL OVERVIEWA. Municipal Profile
AREA PROFILE
MUNICIPALITYNO. OF
BARANGAYS
POPULATION
LAND AREA(km2)
NO. OF ESTABLISHMENTS
(as per BPLO)
Piat 18 24,624139.60
km2 (53.90 sq mi)
561
B. Jurisdictional Map of the Municipality
Just like most of the municipalities of the country, Piat was created into municipality during the SpanishRegime. The first Spanish missionaries who came to the province found out that the existing settlements weresporadically distributed along the Chico River.
The Rio Chico flows down the province through flats and foothills and finally meets the Cagayan River inthe Nassiping area. The people living on these flats and foothills are known as Itawes. The Itawes region formedthe second part of Cagayan, and included the towns of Lobo (Tabang), Piat, Tuao, Malaueg and Sta. Cruz deGumpat (Lingay). In 1603, the orders of the Alkalde Mayor Juan Clavijo were so oppressive that the natives roseup in revolt in the Itawes and the Yrraya regions. Bishop Benavides wrote up the king of Spain about theseabuses of the encomienderos and Spanish officials. During the time of Bishop Diego de Soria, the King of Spainordered him to make arrangements with the Dominicans for the pacification, and ultimately the conversion ofthese Itawes tribes. Accordingly, three friars were sent in 1603 to the estuary of Lobo (Rio Chico or Bangag). In1591 there was an encomienda here consisting of 4,000 tributes (families) with a population of 16,000. In 1598the Dominican Chronicle mentioned the mission of Lobo which was accepted ecclesiastically on May 9, 1604 andwas later called Tabang. This was the first mission in the Itawes area.
The second mission built by the Dominicans in the Itawes was Piat, originally called "Pia". According toFr. Malumbres there were encomiendas here before the coming of the friars. The encomienderos were DonPedro Barrada, an army officer; Don Juan de Aranda and Dona Isabel de Cardona in the year 1617. The first masswas said on August 24, 1604 when there were already about 1,000 families. It became an ecclesiastical town onMay 1, 1610 under the patronage of Sto. Domingo de Guzman. A convent and a church was put up in 1740 byFray Francisco Jimenez but was burnt in 1865 and reconstructed by Fr. Gurumeta, and the roofing with ironsheets was done by Fr. Isidro Rodriguez.
C. Brief History of Piat
It is said that Piat got its name probably from the word “Apiyyat” (meaning Massage) as thepredominant art of healing during those times and from the native word “Pia” which meansgoodness, usefulness, good health or pleasant looks. It is definite; however, that the old name ofthe town is Pias as this name is engraved in the old bells of Sto. Domingo Church. The name Pias,however, was changed to Piat because the Itawes dialect has a penchant of converting s at the endof words to t for instance: Dios to Diot, Lunes to Lunit, Martes to Martit and consequently Pias toPiat.
The image of Our Lady of Piat was sculptured in Macao and brought to Nueva Segovia byBishop Diego de Soria in 1604. In the pacification and conversion campaign of the Itawes, it wasdecided to bring the image to Sto. Domingo church in Piat. Before long the people sawmanifestations of divine favors through Our Lady, and devotion and attachment to her imagebordered fanaticism. This can be gleamed from the fact that when Fr. Juan de Santa Ana took theimage to Tuguegarao, the people of Piat protested and would not accept a replica of it in returneven though how beautiful. Because of threats and fear of revolt, the original image was broughtback to Piat, but because the people of Tuao were also clamoring for it, it was decided that theimage will be placed in a chapel located between Piat and Tuao. Because of frequent inundations ofthe Rio Chico that caused so much damages to crops and properties. It was decided to build asanctuary on a hilltop, half mile from the church of Sto. Domingo. The sanctuary was built andcompleted in 1623.
…And what’s all about the Miraculous Lady in the hill???
Nuestra Señora Visitacion de Piat is the Miraculous Lady on the Hill to whom the Christianity of Piat isgreatly attributed. It is because of her that Piat has achieved renown and recognition. Balikbayans andtourists always include the Shrine of Our Lady of Piat in their itinerary; no official visitor is consideredsufficiently entertained unless he is taken to Piat at anytime of the year.
It is recalled in history how initially the natives of Piat showed indifference and resistance tothe new religion; how they had taken part in an uprising which they thought would wipe out the way oflife being introduced to them. But Spanish reaction did not go the other way. To win these warlikeTwits to Christ, the Dominicans brought the image from Macao to Piat.
According to the Ybanag history by Fr. Julian Malumbres, the image of the Virgin was carvedby a sculptor in Macao and was brought to Cagayan by Bishop Diego de Soria in 1601.
Today, this Miraculous lady has made Piat a Pilgrimage Center where thousands of devoteesflock during the year. In recent years, foot pilgrimages have been organized through theencouragement of Rev. Fr. Joseph, a Polish who served as a parish priest in Abulug, Cagayan. Thepeople from Abulug, Sanchez Mira, Claveria, Pamplona, Aparri and other towns from the seconddistrict of Cagayan, adapting this tradition from this priest would always find time to visit the Virgin ofPiat on a “foot pilgrimage.”
The original people were the Ytawits or Itawes. They were governed by council of leaderscalled “Kamaranan”. The natives were divided into warring factions. One such faction was the Zambalitribe, a fierce and war-like people who were feared by the Spaniards.
II. ADMINISTRATIVE UPDATE
A. Personnel Administration
MUNICIPALITY
OFFICER NON OFFICER
NUP TOTAL
SSUPT SUPT CINSP SINSP INSP SFO4 SFO3 SFO2 SFO1 FO3 FO2 FO1
PIAT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 1 0 1 0 9
(as of 11 January 2019)
MUNICIPALITY
POPULATION AS OF 2018
IDEAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL
ACTUAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL
SHORTAGE OF PERSONNEL
IDEAL NUMBER OF FIRE TRUCKS
ACTUAL NUMBER OF FIRE TRUCKS
SHORTAGE OF FIRE TRUCKS
PIAT 24,624 15 9 5 1 1 0
Ideal Ratio of Firefigther to Firetruck =1:14
Ideal Ratio of Firefighter to Population = 1:2,000
Ideal Ratio of Firetruck to Population = 1:28,000
Table A-1b Total Strength vs Actual Strength
STATIONTOTAL
STRENGHT
ON TRNG/ ON SUSPENSION ACTUAL STRENGHT
Piat Fire Station 9 0 9TOTAL 9 0 9
Table A-2 Training Profile
TRAINING TOTAL
OSEC PSOAC OBC W/OUTOBC OCC FPSC FAIIC FAIC FIC FSBC P/FBRC W/OUT
FBRC NUP
PIAT FS 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 9
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 9
B.. Personnel due for Retirement for 2019
No. of Retirees per month TOTAL
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
PIAT FS 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
III. LOGISTICAL UPDATE
MUNICIPALITY DATE STARTED/ NTP CONTRACT AMOUNT PROGRESS OF
CONSTRUCTIONDATE OF
COMPLETION REMARKS
PIAT FIRE STATION NEGATIVE
A. Status of Fire Station/Sub-Station
STATUS OF CONSTRUCTION OF FIRE STATION BUILDINGSCY 2018
STATUS REPAIR OF RESCUE TRANSPORT VEHICLECY 2018
PIAT FS DATE AWARDED BUDGET AMOUNT OF CONTRACT
PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION
(% ofAccomplishment)
DATE OFCOMPLETION REMARKS
NEGATIVE NEGATIVE NEGATIVE NEGATIVE NEGATIVE NEGATIVE NEGATIVE
B. Status of Fire Apparatus, Ambulance and Service Vehicle
STATUS REPAIR OF FIRETRUCKCY 2018
MUNICIPALITY DATE AWARDED
AMOUNT OF CONTRACT
PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION
(% ofAccomplishment
)
DATE OFCOMPLETION REMARKS
PIAT FIRE STATIONPIAT, CAGAYAN
FORD ROUGHNECK F/T
November 19, 2018 94,794 N/A May 04, 2019 Under Repair
FIRE PREVENTION COMPARATIVE REPORT
CY 2017 CY 2018 VARIANCE(%)
No. of Building Plan Reviewed/ProcessedAnd Issued FSEC 36 64
43.75
No. of FSIC for Occupancy Permit Issued 51 25 -104.00
No. of FSIC for Business/Permit to Operate Issued 345 534 35.39
TOTAL FSIC ISSUED 396 559 29.16
Notice to Comply Issued 5 7 28.57
Notice to Correct Violations Issued 0 0 0
Abatement Order 0 0 0
Amount of Fire Code Fees Collected 200,063.00 161,191.00 -24.12
IV. OPERATIONAL UPDATE
NUMBER OF ESTABLISHMENT INSPECTED
A. Fire PreventionNUMBER OF ESTABLISHMENT INSPECTED
FIRE PREVENTION COMPARATIVE REPORTNO. OF ESTABLISHMENT INSPECTED CY 2017 CY 2018 VARIANCE(%)ASSEMBLY 2 4 50.00EDUCATIONAL 1 4 75.00HEALTH CAREDETENTION AND CORRECTIONALRESIDENTIAL 51 25 -104.00MERCANTILE 268 369 27.37BUSINESS 32 24 -33.33INDUSTRIAL 32 22 -45.45STORAGE 7 8 12.50MIXED 2 2 0.00MISCELLANEOUS 8 3 -166.67
TOTAL 403 561 28.16
MUNICIPALITY
20% LGU SHARED
STATUS
REMARKSAMOUNTPROCURED/SPEND
REMAININGBALANCE
(UNDER LGU ACCOUNT)
1 Piat 86,612.13 83,923.54 2,282.09 RECEIVED
B. 20% Share of LGU (CY 2010-2013)
MUNICIPALITY 20% LGU SHARED
STATUS
REMARKSAMOUNTPROCURED
REMAININGBALANCE
(UNDER LGU ACCOUNT)
Piat 86,612.13 83,923.54 2,282.09 RECEIVED
B. Fire SuppressionFIRE INCIDENT COMPARATIVE REPORT
KINDS CLASSIFICATION CY 2017 CY 2018 VARIANCE(%)ST
RUCT
URA
L FI
RE
Residential 1 3 66.67
Commercial/Mercantile 0
Mixed 0
Business/Government Offices 0
Educational 0
Miscellaneous 0
Healthcare 0
Industrial 0
Storage 0
TOTAL 1 3 66.67
FIRE INCIDENT COMPARATIVE REPORTKINDS CLASSIFICATION CY 2017 CY 2018 VARIANCE(%)
NONSTRUCTURAL
FIRE
Grass, rubbish and forest fire 0 1 100
Motor Vehicle 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 1 100
GRAND TOTAL 1 4 100
AMOUNT OF DAMAGES 365,000 487,867 25.18
2017 CLASSIFICATION NUMBER OF INCIDENTS
1 Residential 1
TOP 3 CLASSIFICATION OF FIRECY 2017 AND 2018
2018 CLASSIFICATION NUMBER OF INCIDENTS
1 Residential 32 Grassfire/Rubbish 1
C. Fire Investigation
CAUSES OF FIRE
DESCRIPTION CY 2017 CY 2018 VARIANCE(%)
Electrical connection 0
Electrical appliance 1 1 0.00
Spontaneous combustion 0
Unattended cooking/stove 2 100
Open flame due to torch/gasera/candle 0
LPG Explosion 0
Lighted cigarette butt 0
Lighted match stick/lighter 0
Incendiary device/flammable 0
Open flame (Garbage) 1 100
Fire Crackers 0
Live Embers 0
Under Investigation 0
TOTAL 1 4 75.00
TOP 3 CAUSES OF FIRECY 2017 AND 2018
2017 CAUSE OF FIRE NUMBER OF INCIDENTS
1 Electrical Appliances 1
2018 CAUSE OF FIRE NUMBER OF INCIDENTS
1 Electrical appliance 12 Unattended cooking/stove 23 Open Flame (Garbage) 1
CLASSIFICATION
OF FIRE
DESCRIPTION CY 2017 CY 2018 VARIANCE(%)
Intentional 0 0 0
Accidental 1 4 75.00
Fire cases under investigation 0 0 0
Undetermined 0 0 0
TOTAL 1 4 75.00
CASUALTIES
Fatalities in civilian 0 0 0
Injuries in civilian 0 0 0
Injured Firefighter 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0
UGNAYAN SA BARANGAY
KIDDIE JR FIRE MARSHAL
GOV’T OWNED ESTABLISHMENT
2017 10 3 3
2018 12 7 3
VARIANCE(%) 16.67 57.14 0.00
V. ISSUES AND CONCERNS
1. Lack of Personnel to man the station2. Lack of PPE’s (Personnel Protective Equipment
SCBA – Training on Handling andProper Maintenance
3. Inadequate Promotional Materials – such as leaflets, flyers for Fire Prevention Activities
4. Inadequate Supply of Accountable Forms –such as FSIC, FSEC, OR, OPS
Fire Fighting Demonstration at CSU PIAT
VI. PICTORIALS
LECTURE ABOUT FIRE SAFETY AT CSU PIAT
FIRST AID LECTURE AT CSU PIAT
EARTH QUAKE DRILL ON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WITHIN AOR
EARTH QUAKE DRILL ON ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS WITHIN AOR
EARTH QUAKE DRILL ON ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS WITHIN AOR
EARTH QUAKE DRILL AT PIAT NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
FIRST AID LECTURE AND SLOGAN,POSTER MAKING CONTEST AT PIAT NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
FIRST AID LECTURE AND SLOGAN,POSTER MAKING CONTEST AT PIAT NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
INSPECTION OF CARSUMCO
INSPECTION ON BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN AOR
INSPECTION ON BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN AOR
UGNAYAN SA BARANGAY
UGNAYAN SA BARANGAY
UGNAYAN SA BARANGAY
TRAINING OF BARANGAY TANODS
TRAINING OF BARANGAY TANOD
INSPECTION OF ELEM SCHOOL,DAY CARE CENTER AND BARANGAY HALLS
OPEN HOUSE
OPEN HOUSE
SALO-SALO
UNITY WALK
2018 BARANGAY ELECTION
Recommended