Physical Vapour Deposition of Thin Film Coatings

Preview:

Citation preview

1

European Summer School PPST 2008

WITOLD GULBIŃSKI

Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnology

and Vacuum Technique

Koszalin University of Technology, PL

Physical Vapour Deposition of Thin Film CoatingsPart II

Magnetron sputtering

2Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

OutlineInteraction of charged particles with electric and magnetic field. Magnetron effect.

Magnetron sputtering sources (coaxial, planar and other constructions).

Unbalanced magnetrons (closed field systems).

Magnetron sputtering sources for magnetic materials.

Pulsed magnetron sputtering (unipolar and bipolar sputtering, suppression of unipolar arcs)

High power magnetron sputtering – selfsputtering.

High Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering (HIPIMS)

3Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

MAGNETRON SPUTTERING SOURCES

4Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Electron motion in homogeneous magnetic field

5Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Drift of electron in inhomogeneous magnetic field.

A

A

A-A

6Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Electron motion in so called

“magnetic mirror" area.

Magnetic „bottle”

7Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Electron motion in crossed, homogeneous

electric (E) and magnetic (B) fields.

cathode

vdRL

ve

vR E B

anode+

-

Let’s add electric field E perpendicullar to magnetic field vector B

8Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Basic configurations of cylindrical magnetron sputtering systems:a) the general one, b) so called post-magnetron configuration with the cathode end-plates,c) multi-trap configuration

_ _ _+ + +

9Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Cylindrical magnetron cross section

a) discharge structure,

b) electron paths.

a)

b)

10Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Advantages of co-axial magnetrons,

Homogeneous target erossion,

High deposition rate (when compared to diode systems)

Very large substrate mounting space

Drawbacks of co-axial magnetrons,

High thermal load to substrates dueto electron bombardment (electroncollecting grid anodes)

11Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Inverted cylindrical magnetron.

N

S S

N

anodecathode

12Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Planar magnetron sputtering sources: rectangular(a) and circular(b)

13Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Electron movement over the planar magnetron cathode.

cathode

14Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Planar magnetron source - secondary electron escape paths

15Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Discharge voltage vs. discharge current for planar magnetron source for different magnetic field magnitude.

16Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Discharge voltage vs. discharge current for planar magnetron source for different argon pressures.

I [A]c

B = 500 Gsgas - Artarget - Tiplanar magnetron

6.5 10 Pa-2

U [V]c

0.11-1 Pa

0.1 Pa0.08 Pa

0.065 Pa

17Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Power density [W/cm2]

Dep

ositi

onra

te[ µ

m/m

in]

WTiCr

AlNiPt

CuAuAgSn

1192320C

1089620C

19710640C

6310840C

19517680C

276600C

Argon40

18434220C

4816680C

Dependence of deposition rate of metals on power density at the target (planar magnetron).

18Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Film thickness distribution for different target - substrate distance (magnetron cathode diameter: 80 mm)

19Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Planarmagnetron source –constructiondetails

20Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Sputter gun

21Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Sputter gun

22Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Sputter gun

23Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Sputter gun

24Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Magnetrons with rotated targets Coating of large surfaces

Continous coating of foils

25Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Double source magnetron sputtering system – combination od planar and rotatingtarget sources (deposition of 2-component coatings)

26Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Triple source magnetron sputtering system – for deposition of 3-component CMA coatings

2 inch planar magnetrons (Al, Cu, Fe)

Rotated and heated substrate holder

3xDC power supply in master-slavemode

LN2 trap

27Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Planar magnetron with additionalhot filament

Thermally emited electrons areinjected into the magnetic trap

Enhanced ionization

Lower working pressure

28Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Magnetron sputtering of ferromagnetic materials(Fe, Co, Ni…)

Ferromagnetic target

Short circuit for magnetic field

No magnetic field above the cathode(target)

TARGET SECTIONALIZATION

29Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Advantages of planar magnetron sources

High deposition rate (up to hundreds nm/min)

DC and RF operation possible

Low discharge voltage (200-600V)

Low working pressure (1Pa)

Easy upscaling

Easy maintenance

Easy design of multisource systems

Plasma confined in target vicinity (coating oftemperature sensitive materials possible)

30Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Unbalanced magnetrons– why and what does it mean?

For the balanced magnetic circuit: the intensities of magnetic flux through the pole faces of the outer poles and through the pole face of the inner pole are identical or comparable.

A preferred strengthening or weakening of one of the involved poles of the magnet leads to “unbalanced” magnetic circuit.

Such an effect can be obtained by:

the change of cross section surface ratio of outer and inner pole of the magnet,

external field source

31Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Balanced (a), permanently unbalanced (b) and externally unbalanced (c) magnetic circuits of planar magnetron sputter source.

32Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

a) Dual unbalanced magnetron closed - field system called „ionic gemini”

b) Four source, closed field sputtering system

b)

a)

Opposite poles

33Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Advantages of unbalanced magnetrons

Plasma expanded to the substrate,

Higher (up to 10mA/cm2) ion current density at the substrate

Ion assisted deposition possible

„Closed field” multi-source systems widely used by industry for hardand wear resistant coatings deposition

34Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Pulsed magnetron sputtering

Why?

Deposition (direct and reactive) of insulating films means:

arcing problem (unipolar and bipolar arcs)

disappearing anode effect

low deposition rate

35Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

What is unipolar arc?

Dielectric island(Al2O3), few nm thick+ + + + + + + + + + +

Metallic target (Al) at high negative potential

PLASMA

Cathode

Electric field higher thanbrakedown field

Local arc discharge

36Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Fundamental capacitor model.

J. Sellers, Surface and Coatings Technology 98 (1998) 1245 - 1250

Plasma

Target A1

Al O (dielectric)2 3

(dielectric)

Plasma

Target

Dielectri c breakdown(Micro - Arcing)

37Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Arrangements for unipolar (a) and symmetric bipolar (b) pulsed magnetron sputtering

a) b)

pulsedpower supply

pulsedpower supply

disappearing anode andarcing problem solved

38Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Normal sputter mode

Asymmetric bipolar pulse sputtering(single source)

T0-T1 duty cycle < break down voltage buildup time

39Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Reversal mode (neutralizationof positive surfacecharge at the dielectric)

Asymmetric bipolar pulse sputtering(single source)

+Vrev about 10% of Vsputt.

40Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Return to sputter mode

Asymmetric bipolar pulse sputtering(single source)

41Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Magnetron sputter source with double ring plasma on 2 electrically separated targets

Can be operatedin bipolar mode

42Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

High power DC magnetron sputtering(self-sputtering of metals)

Due to high power dissipated at the target of „self-sputtering” source, ionisation conditions change resulting in an increased number of ionised target atoms in the plasma.

According to energy exchange model metal ions, carrying the mass equal to that of target material atoms, induce very effective sputtering.

When the power density at the cathode exceeds a „self-sputtering”threshold value, argon supply can be closed and the discharge becomes sustained by metal ions only.

In transition region between classical sputtering and self-sputtering, both these processes coexist.

43Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Light emission spectra recorded during coppersputtering in argon, at three target currents.

Radzimski et al.: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Vol. 15, No. 2, Mar/Apr 1997

44Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

New trends:High power impulse magnetron sputtering (HIPIMS)

Very short pulse duty time (few % of AC voltage period)

Very high discharge current in pulse (in kA range)

High fraction of ionized target material in the plasma

Medium deposition rate

Hysteresis effect during reactive sputtering highly suppressed -stable reactive deposition

45Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Peak power density: 2000 Wcm-2

Repetition frequency; 100 Hz (T = 10ms)Current pulse duty time = 200µs i.e. 2% of the pulse periodPlasma density n = 1013 cm-3 (classical magnetron: n = 1010 cm-3)

High Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering (HIPIMS)A. P. Ehiasarian (2001)

46Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

In conventional magnetron discharges:

HIPIMS exhibits n = 1!

nkUI =where: n = 5…10

HIPIMS

Ehiasarian, A.P. R.; Munz, W.-D.; Hultman, L.; Helmersson, U.; Kouznetsov, V., Vacuum, 65 (2002) 147-154

47Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

HIPIMS

Eion = 20- 40 eV

48Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

HIPIMS has been implemented successfully on industrial scale machines

HIPIMS discharges produce metal ions charged up to 2+ for Ti, Cr and Nb

The metal ion–to–neutral ratio increases continuously as a function of peak power

Metal ion etching by HIPIMS promotes local epitaxial growth and improves theadhesion of coatings without incorporation of droplets

HIPIMS pretreatment improves the corrosion performance due to defect-freeinterface of multilayer films

High Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering (HIPIMS)

A. P. Ehiasarian

Nanotechnology Centre for PVD Research,Materials and Engineering Research Institute,Sheffield Hallam University, UK

49Institute of Mechatronics, Nanotechnologyand Vacuum TechniqueKoszalin University of Technology, PL

Koszalin, August 18-29, 2008

European Summer School PPST 2008

Recommended literature

1. Kelly, P.J., Arnell, R.D. (2000) Magnetron Sputtering: A Review of Recent Developments and Applications, Vacuum, 56, 159-172.

2. Safi, I. (2000) Recent Aspects Concerning DC Reactive Magnetron Sputtering of Thin Films: a Review, Surf. Coat. Technol. 127, 203-219.

3. Musil, J. (1998) Recent Advances in Magnetron Sputtering Technology, Surf. Coat. Technol. 100/101, 280-286.

4. Bunshah, R.F. (1991) Handbook of Deposition Technologies for Films and Coatings: Science, Technology and Applications, Second Edition, Noyes Publ., New Jersey

5. Wasa, K., Hayakawa, S. (1991) Handbook of Sputter Deposition Technology, Noyes Publ., Park Ridge, New Jersey.

6. S. M. Rossnagel, J.J. Cuomo & W.D. Westwood (eds.) Handbook of Plasma Processing Technology, Noyes Publ. (1990) Park Ridge, New Jersey

Recommended