View
230
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
1/24
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
2/24
A Senator or a Member of the House ofRepresentatives shall, in all offensespunishable by not more than six yearsimprisonment, be privileged from arrest whilethe Congress is in session. No Member shallbe questioned nor be held liable in any otherplace for any speech or debate in theCongress or in any committee thereof.
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
3/24
1. Privilege from arrest
2. Privilege of speech and debate
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
4/24
Legislators are privilegedfrom arrest while the Congress isin session with respect tooffenses punishable by up to sixyears of imprisonment.
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
5/24
The accused-appellant, Romeo G. Jalosjos, is
a full-fledged member of the House ofRepresentatives. He has been convicted by the
lower court for two counts of statutory rape adsix counts of acts of lasciviousness, but saidjudgment is pending appeal in the SC. Jalosjosnow files a motion asking that he be allowed tofully discharge his duties as a congressman,
including attending Congressional sessions andcommittee meetings, despite being convicted ofa non-bailable offense.
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
6/24
His arguments:1. Mandate of sovereign
will
2. One of his functions isto attend sessions
SCs responses:1. Jalosjos is convicted ofa felony punishable byreclusion perpetua,thus he could not claimparliamentary immunity
from suit2. The members of theCongress cannot becompelled to attendsession if the reason forthe absence is a
legitimate one
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
7/24
3. On several occasions,he was granted toleave prison premisesfor official, correctional
and medical reasons
3. Emergency orcompelling temporaryleaves fromimprisonment areallowed to all prisoners,
at the discretion of theauthorities or upon courtorders. To allow him toattend sessions five daysa week will virtually makehim a free man
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
8/24
4. His constituentswanted their voices tobe heard
4. He admitted that a.) heis provided with acongressional office inthe Bilibid where heattends to his
constituents, b.) underdetention, he has filedresolutions and motions,and c.) he receives hissalaries and benefits as aCongressman
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
9/24
5. He is a bona fidemember of the Houseof Representatives. Ineffect, SC, as a co-
equal of Congress,should respect hismandate
5. Even under detention,accompanied with validrestraints, Jalosjos hasbeen discharging his
mandate
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
10/24
The performance oflegitimate and even
essential duties by publicofficers has never been anexcuse to free a personvalidly in prison.
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
11/24
Petitioner Trillanes, along with hiscomrades, was charged with coup d etat forstorming into the Oakwood. In 2007, he wona seat in the Senate. Before the
commencement of his term, he filed anOmnibus Motion for Leave of Court to beAllowed to Attend Senate Sessions andRelated Requests to the Makati RTC.
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
12/24
Jalosjos Already convicted
Charged with twocounts of statutory
rape and six counts ofacts of lasciviousness,crimes involving moralturpitude
Attempted to flee
Trillanes Has not been convicted Charged with the
offense coup d etat, a
charge commonlyregarded as a politicaloffense
Voluntarily
surrendered
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
13/24
The said distinctions were not elemental inthe pronouncement in Jalosjos that electionto Congress is not a reasonable classificationin criminal law enforcement as the functions
and duties of officers are not substantialdistinctions which lift one from the class ofprisoners interrupted in their freedom andrestricted in their liberty of movement
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
14/24
All persons, except those charged with offensespunishable by reclusion perpetua when evidenceof guilt is strong, shall before conviction, bebailable by sufficient sureties, or be released on
recognizance as may be provided by law. Theright to bail shall not be impaired even when theprivilege of the writ of habeas corpus issuspended. - Art. III, Sec. 13
Equally applicable to rape and coup d etat cases,both being punishable by reclusion perpetua
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
15/24
The rationale of public self-defense appliesequally to detention prisoners and convictedprisoners
All prisoners whether under preventivedetention or serving final sentence can notpractice their profession nor engage in anybusiness or occupation, or hold office,elective or appointive, while in detention. Thisis a necessary consequence of arrest anddetention (People v. Hon. Maceda)
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
16/24
In his contention that his election provides
the legal justification to allow him to serve hismandate, after the people, in their sovereigncapacity, elected him as Senator, his electoralvictory only signifies that when the voters
elected him to the Senate, they did so withfull awareness of the limitations on hisfreedom of actions, with knowledge that hecould achieve only such legislative results
which he could accomplish within theconfines of prison.
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
17/24
The performance of legitimate and evenessential duties by public officers has neverbeen an excuse to free a person validly inprison.
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
18/24
No member shall be questioned or heldliable in any forum other than his/herrespective Congressional body for any debateor speech in Congress or in any committee
thereof
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
19/24
Protection is only against forum other thanthe Congress itself.
The speech or debate must be made inperformance of their duties as members ofCongress .
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
20/24
The remarks must be made while thelegislature of the legislative committee is
functioning, that is in session
That they must be made in connection withthe discharge of official duties
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
21/24
is to enable and encourage a representativeof the public to discharge his public trustwith firmness and success for it isindispensably necessary that he should enjoy
the fullest liberty of speech and that heshould be protected from resentment of everyone, however, powerful, to whom the exerciseof that liberty may occasion offense.(Osmea, Jr. v. Pendatun)
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
22/24
x x x I am not angry. I am irate. I am
foaming in the mouth. I am homicidal. I amsuicidal. I am humiliated, debased, degraded.And I am not only that, I feel like throwing up to
be living my middle years in a country of thisnature. I am nauseated. I spit on the face of ChiefJustice Artemio Panganiban and his cohorts inthe Supreme Court, I am no longer interested inthe position [of Chief Justice] if I was to be
surrounded by idiots. I would rather be inanother environment but not in the SupremeCourt of idiots x x x.
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
23/24
Courts do not interfere with the legislature orits members in the manner they perform theirfunctions in the legislative floor or incommittee rooms.
Her privilege speech as not actionablecriminally or in a disciplinary proceeding
under the Rules of Court
7/30/2019 Parliamentary Immunities
24/24
Even parliamentary immunity must not beallowed to be used as a vehicle to ridicule,demean, and destroy the reputation of theCourt and its magistrates, nor as an armor for
personal wrath and disgust.
Recommended