View
236
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
1/113
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
2/113
Organizationalbehavior
Definition-
Is a field of study that investigate the impact that individuals,group, and structure have on behavior within organizations forthe purpose of applying such knowledge toward improving an
organization's effectiveness.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
3/113
The nature of organizationalbehavior
p The field of organizational behaviorattempts to understand human behaviorin organizational settings , the
organization itself, and the individual organization interface. These areas at atime , a complete understanding oforaganizational behavior requires
knowledge of all three areas.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
4/113
environment
Human behavior in organizational settings
The individual-organization interface
The organization
environment
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
5/113
Definition ( Intuition / systematicstudy)
p Systematic study Looking at relationships ,attempting to attribute cause and
effects,and drawing conclusion based on scientific evidenceIntituitionA gut feeling not necessarily supported by research. Feeling about
what, why, how to do.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
6/113
Disciplines contributing forOBp Psychology- is the science that seeks to measure, explain,and sometimes change the
behavior of humans and other animals .
p Sociology- the study of people in relation to their fellow human beings.
p Social psychology blends concepts from both psychology and sociology. It focuseson the influence of people on one another.
p Anthropology- is the study of societies to learn about human beings and their
activitiesp Political science-study the behavior of individuals and groups within political
environment.
p
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
7/113
psychology
Learning,motivation,personality,Emotions,perception,training,
Leadership effectiveness,Job satisfaction,individual decision
making,
performance appraisal,attitudemeasurementEmployee selection,work design,work
stress
sociology
Gr.dynamic,work team,communicationPower,conflict,intercrop behavior
Formal org theoryOrg technologyOrg changeOrg culture
Social;psychology
Behavior change,attitudechange
Communication,go processesGroup decision making
anthropology
Comparative valueComparative attitude
Cross-cultural analysis
Org cultureOrg envy
Politicalscience
ConflictInterior politics
power
Behavioralscience
contributionUnit ofanalysis
individual
group
Organizationsystem
Study ofOrganization
behavior
output
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
8/113
The Historical roots
p The scientific era
p Classical organization theory
p The hawthorne studies
p The human relation movement
p Toward organizational Behavior Thevalue of people
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
9/113
Challengesp Responding to globalization
p Managing workforce diversity
p Improving quality and productivity
p Responding to coming labor shortage
p Improving customer service
p Improving people skillp Empowering people
p Stimulating innovation and changes
p Coping with temporaries
p Improving ethical behavior
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
10/113
OB MODELThe model is based on three level of analysis in OB
p Organization level
p Group level
p Individual level
The model depends on two variablesp Dependent
p independent
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
11/113
VariablesDependent variables
p Productivity- implies a concern for both effectiveness and efficiency
p Absenteeism as the failure to report for work
p Turnover- is the voluntary and involuntary permanent withdrawal from anorganization.
p Organization citizenship behavior (cob)
p Job satisfactionThe Independent variables
p Individual level variables
p Group level variables
p Organization systems level variables
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
12/113
Four modelsAutocratic Custodial Supportive Collegial
Basic ofmodel
Power Economicresources
Leadership Partnership
Managerialorientation
Authority Money Support Team work
Employeeorientation
Obedience Security andbenefits
Jobperformance
Responsiblebehavior
EmployeepsychologicalResults
Dependence onboss
Dependenceonorganization
Participation Self discipline
EmployeeneedsMeet
Subsistence security Status andrecognition
Selfactualization
Performanceresult
minimum Passivecooperation
Awakeneddrives
Moderateenthusiasm
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
13/113
The S-O-B-C model
p Stimulas
p Organism
p Behavior
p Consequences
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
14/113
AttitudesAttitudes are evaluating statements either favorable or
unfavorable concerning objects ,people or events . Theyreflects how one feels about something .
Attitude are not the same as values but the two are interrelated .The three components of attitudes
p Cognitive components
p Affective component
p Behavioral component
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
15/113
Types of attitude
p Job satisfaction
p Job involvement
p Organizational commitment
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
16/113
Cognitive Dissonance theory
Leon Festinger proposed the theory of cognitive dissonance.This theory explains the linkage between attitude and
behaviorDissonance means an inconsistency .
Cognitive dissonance refers to any incompatibility that anindividual might perceive between two or more of his or herattitudes, or between his or her behavior and attitude .
The desire to reduce dissonance would be determined byp Importancep Influencep reward
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
17/113
Job satisfaction
p Satisfaction and productivity
p Satisfaction and absenteeism
p Satisfaction and turn over
p Job satisfaction and OCB( Org citizenshipbehavior
p Job satisfaction and customer satisfaction
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
18/113
dissatisfaction
p Exit
p Voice
p Loyalty
p neglect
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
19/113
Transactional Analysis
p Transactional analysis ( TA) is a system for theanalysis of personal and interpersonalcommunication and behavior. It was definedand evolved by Dr. Erik Berne, whose thesiswas that there existed in everyone three quiteclearly distinguishable sets of attitudes and
behaviors. He called them ego states.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
20/113
Ego States
p Parent
p Adult
p Child Configurations
ComplementaryCrossedUlterior
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
21/113
Johari windowp Feedback
Open or publicBlind
Hidden or private Undiscovered or unknown
Known to self Unknown to self
Known to others
UnknownTo others
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
22/113
personality
Personality is the dynamic organizationwithin the individual of thosepsychophysical systems that determine hisunique adjustments to his environment .
Personality is the sum total of ways in whichan individual reacts to and interacts withothers .
Its defined in terms of measurable traits .
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
23/113
Personality determinants
p Heredity
p Environment
p Situation
p
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
24/113
Personality traitsp There are various characteristic that describe an individuals
behavior .popular characteristic includesshy,aggressive,submissive,lazy,ambitious.loyal and timid.These characteristic when exhibited in large number ofsituation are called personality traits .
p Researchers have long believed that these traits could help inemployee selection,matching people to jobs ,and in guidingcareer development decision
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
25/113
The Myers Briggs Type indicator
p Mostly used personality assesmentinstrument in the world
p Depending on the result of the test
p Individual are classifie on terms as( E orI),(S or N), (T or F), (J or P),
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
26/113
MBTIThese terms are defined as
p Extroverted vs Introverted Extroverte dindividual are outgoing ,sociable ,and assertive. Introverts are quite and shy
p Sensing vs Intuitive sensing types are practicle and preferroutine and order. They focus on details . Intituitives rely on
unconscious processes and look at the big picture.p Thinking vs feeling Thinking types use reason and logic to
handle problems. Feeling types rely on their personal valuesand emotions.
p Judging vs perceiving- judging types want control and prefer their
world to be ordered and structured . Perceiving types areflexible and spontaneous .
p
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
27/113
MBITp Intj-are visionariesThey usually have original minds and great drive of their own ideas
and purpose . They are characterized as skeptical , critical ,independent , determined and often stubborn.
p Estj are organizer .they are realistic , logical analytical and decisive and have a natural
head for business or mechanics .. They like to organize and runthe activities .
Exercise
http://smb//tmp/svk9g.tmp/Training%20Instruments-9-21st%20batch.ppthttp://smb//tmp/svk9g.tmp/Training%20Instruments-9-21st%20batch.ppt8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
28/113
Major personality Attributesinfluencing OB
p Locus of control-
1.Internals belives that they can controltheir destinies
2.Externals who see their lives as beigncontrolled by outside forces,
A persons perception of sources of his or
her fate is termed locus of control.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
29/113
personality Attributes
Machiavellianism- named after NiccoloMachiavelli.
p .an individual high in machiavellianism ispragmatic , maintains emotional distance and
belives that end can justify meansp High mach florish
1.When they interacts face to face with othersrather than indirectly
2.When the situation has a minimum numbers ofrules and regulations
3.When emotional involvement with detailsirrelevent to winning distracts low machs.
4.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
30/113
personality Attributes
p Self esteem is directly related toexpectation for success
p Self monitoring refers to an individual,s
ability to adjust his or her behavior toexternal , situational factors
p Risk taker
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
31/113
Types of personality
p Type a
p Type b
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
32/113
Type Ap Are always moving ,walking and eating rapidly
p Feel impatient with the rate at which most events take place
p Strives to think or do two or more thing at once
p Cannot cope with leisure time
p Are obsessed with numbers , measurable their success in terms ofhow many or how much of everything they acquire.
p
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
33/113
Type B
p Never suffer from a sense of time urgencywith its accompanying impatience
p Feels no need to display or discuss either
their achievements or accomplishmentsunless such exposure is demended bythe situation
p Play for fun and relxation , rather than toexhibit their superiority at any cost
p Can relax without guilt
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
34/113
Proactive personality
p Identify opportunities , show initiatives ,take action and persevere untillmeanigful change occurs. They create
positive change in their environment ,regardless or even in spite of constraintsor obstacles.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
35/113
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
36/113
Motivation
p Motivation is the set of forces that leadspeople to behave in particular ways
p P=M+A+E
P= performanceM=MotivationA=ability
E= environment
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
37/113
The motivation process
Needs
(deprivation) Drives( deprivation
with directions )
Goals( reductionof drives )
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
38/113
Characteristics of motives
p Similar motives may be manifestedthrough different behaviors.
p Different motives may be expressed
through similar behavior .p Motives may appear in disguised form.
p Any single act of behavior may express
several motives
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
39/113
Classification of motives
p Primary
p Secondary
p Power
p Achievement
p Affiliation
p Security
p Status
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
40/113
Morale
p According to Dale S.Beach Morale is thetotal satisfaction a person derives fromhis job, his work group, his boss, his
organization and his environment.p It is defined as a composite of feelings and
sentiments that contribute to generalfeelings of satisfaction.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
41/113
Concept of morale
p Fundamental psychological concept
p Multidimensional concept
p Group phenomenon
p Contagious
p Moral is different than motivation
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
42/113
Factors influencing moralep External
p Internal
1.Goals of an organization
2.Structure3.Nature of task
4.Managerial philosophy
5.Working conditions
6.Groups
Relation ship of morale and
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
43/113
Relation ship of morale andproductivity
p High productivity high morale
p Low productivity high morale
p High productivity low morale
p Low productivity low morale
The motivational frame
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
44/113
The motivational framework
Experiencedneed
deficiencies
Search forWays to
Satisfy needs
Choice ofgoal directed
behaviors
EnactmentOf Behavioral
Choice(performance)
ExperiencedRewards or
Punishments
ReassessmentOf need
deficiencies
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
45/113
Needs and motives
p Primary needs are the basic physicalrequirements necessary to sustain life .
p Secondary needs are requirements learned
from the environment and culture inwhich the person lives.p A motive is a persons reason for choosing
one behavior from among several
choices.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
46/113
Theories
p Maslows Hierarchy of needs
p Herzbergs dual structure Theory
p Alderfers ERG Theory
p McClellands theory of Needs
p The job characteristic model
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
47/113
Maslows heirarchy of needs
Selfactualization
Esteem needs
Love needs
Safety needs
Psychologic
al needs
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
48/113
Herzbergs theoryp Motivational
p Recognition
p Responsibility
p
Possibility of growthp Advancement
p Achievements
p Work itself
p Hygiene factors
p Company policies
p Technical supervision
p
Salaryp Interpersonal relation
p Job security
p Personal life
p Working conditionp Status
p
p
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
49/113
Group dynamics
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
50/113
group
p A group is defined as two or moreindividuals , interacting andinterdependent, who have come
together to achieve particular objectives.p Groups can be either formal or informal
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
51/113
Types of groupsp Formal group- those defined by the organizations
structure, with designated work assignment establishingtask .
p Informal group- are alliances that are neither formallystructured nor organizationally determined
p
A command group is determined by organizational chart.p Task group also organizationally determined, representthose working together to complete a job task.
p Interest group people who may or may not be aligned intocommon command or task groups may affiliate to attaina specific objectives with which each is concerned.
p
Friendship group-based on common characteristics .
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
52/113
An Alternative Modelp Groups direction
p 1st inertia
p A transition at the end of this phase
p A transition initiates a lot of changes
p A second phase of inertia follows the transitionp The groups last meeting is characterized by markedly
accelerated activity
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
53/113
Why formation of groups
p Security
p Status
p Self-esteem
p Affiliation
p Powerp Goal achievement
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
54/113
Stages of group development
p The five stage model
p An alternative model
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
55/113
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
56/113
Group structure
p Roles
p Norms
p Status
p Group sizep And the degree of group cohesiveness.
p
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
57/113
Roles
p Role identity
p Role perception
p Role expectation
p Role conflictp
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
58/113
Normsp Hawthorn studies
p Common clauses of norms
1. Performance norms
2. Appearance norms
3. Social arrangements norms4. Allocation of resources norms
p Conformity
p Deviant workplace behavior
p
p
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
59/113
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
60/113
size
p Groups made up of odd numbers do apretty good job of exercising the bestelements of both small and large groups.
p
Having an odd number of memberseliminates the possibility of ties whenvotes are taken
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
61/113
Cohesivenessp That is the degree to which member are attracted or attached to
each other and are motivated to stay in then group.
p To encourage group cohesiveness
1. Make the group smaller
2. Encourage agreement with group goals
3. Increase the time member spend together
4. Increase the status of the group and the perceived difficulty ofattaining membership in the group
5. Stimulate competition with other groups
6. Give rewards to the group rather than to individual member
7. Physically isolate the group.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
62/113
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
63/113
Group decision making techniques
p Brainstorming
p The nominal group techniques
p Electronic meeting
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
64/113
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
65/113
Group vs Team
Groups team
Share information toward goalachievement
Collective performance toward goalachievement
Synergy neutral Positive synergy
Individual accountability Individual and mutual
Skills required are random and varied complementary
No need of opportunity to engage incollective work
Specific task orientated
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
66/113
Types of teams
p Problem solving teams
p Self managed work teams
p Cross- functional teams
p Virtual teams
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
67/113
Problem solving teamsp Composed of 5-12 membersp Members from Same department
p Few hours or each week interval
p Discuss improving quality , efficiency, and the work
environment.p They rarely have authority to unilaterally implement any of
their suggested action.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
68/113
Self managed work team
p Group of 10 15p Members perform highly related or interdependent jobs and take
on many of the responsibilities of their former supervisors.
p members evaluate each others performance
p
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
69/113
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
70/113
Virtual teams
p Use computer technology to tie togetherphysically dispersed members in orderto achieve common goal.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
71/113
Creating effective teams
Context:Adequate resources
Leadership andstructure
Climate of trustPerformance
evaluationand reward system
Process:Common purposeSpecific goalsTeam efficacyConflict levelsSocial loafing
Team effectiveness
Composition:Abilities of
membersPersonality
Allocating rolesDiversity
Size of teamsMember flexibilityMember preferences
Work design:Autonomy
Skill varietyTask identity
Task significance
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
72/113
Key roles of teams
Advisor linker creator
maintainer
producer organizer
assessor
Teams
promoter
controller
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
73/113
Effectiveness of teams
p Effectiveness teams need to work together andtake collective responsibility to completesignificant task.
p Use of work design characteristics ( skill variety,
Task identity, task significance0p These work design characteristic motivates
because they increase members sense ofresponsibility and ownership over the work andbecause they make the work more interesting
to perform.p Common purposep Specific goals
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
74/113
Effectiveness of teams
p Team efficacy
p Conflict level
p Social loafing
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
75/113
conflict
A process that begins when one partyperceives that another party has negatively
affected , something that the first party
cares about.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
76/113
Different views
p Traditional view of conflict the belief thatall conflict is harmful and must beavoided.
p Human relation view-the belief thatconflict is a natural and inevitableoutcome in any group.
p Interactionist view- the belief that a
conflict is not only a positive force in agroup but that it is absolutely necessaryfor a group to perform effectively.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
77/113
Types of conflictFunctional and dysfunctionalp Functional conflict- conflict that supports the
goals of the group and improves itsperformance.
p Dysfunctional conflict-conflict that hinders groupperformance
Types p Task conflict- conflict over contents and goal of
the workp Relationship conflict- conflict based oninterpersonal relationships.
p Process conflict- conflict over how work getsdone.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
78/113
The conflict process
Antecedentcondition
CommunicationStructure
Personal variables
Perceivedconflict
Feltconflict
Conflict
handlingIntentions
CompetingCollaboratingCompromising
Avoiding
Accommodating
Overtconflictparty;sbehavoirOthersbehavior
IncreasedGroup
performance
DecreasedGroup
Performance
Stage 1Potential
Opposition
Stage 2Cognition
&personalization
Stage 3Intention
s
Stage
4behav
ior
Stage
5outcomes
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
79/113
Levels of conflicts
p Intra Individual Conflict
a)Goal Conflict
b)Role Conflict
p Interpersonal conflict- Johari Window
Open self Hidden self
Blind self Undiscovered self
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
80/113
Levels
p Inter groupp Structural Hierarchical Conflict
FunctionalLine-staffFormal Informal
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
81/113
Management of conflict
p Conflict is inevitablep It can harm achievement
p It can promote innovation of development
of new ideas.p It can be managed.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
82/113
Conflict resolution
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
83/113
techniquesp Problem solvingp Superordinate goals
p Expansion of resources
p Avoidance
p
Smoothingp Compromise
p Authoritative command
p Altering the human variables
p Altering the structural variables
Conflict stimulation
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
84/113
techniques
p Communicationp Bringing in outsider
p Restructuring the organization
p Appointing a devils advocatep
p
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
85/113
Negotiationp Negotiation permeates the interaction of almost every one
in groups and organization
p It can be defined as a process in which two orr more
parties exchange goods or services and attempt to agreeon the exchange rate for them
p Term negotiation and bargaining interchangeably
p
p
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
86/113
Bargaining strategies
p Distributive bargainingp Integrative Bargaining
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
87/113
The negotiation process
Preparation andplanning
Definition ofGround rules
Clarification and
justificationBargaining andProblem solving
Closure and
implementation
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
88/113
Issues in negotiation
p The role of personality traits in negotiationp Gender difference in negotiations
p cultural differences in negotiation
p Third party negotiations
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
89/113
Leadership
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
90/113
Leadership vs management
p Operational vs Conceptualp Followers vs forced
p Internal driven vs external driven
p Formal vs informalp
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
91/113
Leadershipp Sources of power-
Personal abilities
p Focus- Vision andpurpose
p Approach-Transformational
p
Process-Inspirationp Emphasis- Collectivity
p Futurity-Proactive
p Type-Formal and
informal
Management
p Authority delegates
p Operating results
p
Transactionalp Control
p Individualism
p Reactive
p Formal
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
92/113
Trait theory
p Focuses on personal characteristic of the leaderp Seven traits ambition and energy, the desired to lead,
honesty, and integrity , self confidence ,intelligence,high self monitoring, and job relevantknowledge
p
The big five model-extroversion, agreeableness,conscientiousness, emotional stability, opennessto experience.
p Two conclusions 1. Traits can predict leadership
2. Traits do better job at predicting the emergence ofleaders and the appearance of leadership than inactually distinguishing between effective andineffective leaders.
p
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
93/113
Limitation
p Generalization of traitsp Applicability of traits
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
94/113
Behavioral theories
Ohio state studies these researcher sought toidentify independent dimension. They are calledinitiating structure and consideration.
p Initiating structure refers to the extent to whicha leader is likely to define and structure his or
her role and those of subordinates in thesearch for goal attainment.
p Consideration- the extent to which a leader islikely to have job relationships characterized bymutual trust , respect for subordinates ideas
and regards for their feeling.University of Michigan studies- employee
oriented and production orientedp Michigan researchers favored the employee
oriented , related to higher group productivity
and job satisfaction.
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
95/113
Managerial grid
p Blake and Moutonp Also called as leadership grid, - based on the style of concern for
people and concern for production
p Nine possible positions along each axis, creating 81 differentpositions in which the leaders style may fall.
p
1,9- country club managementp 99- team management
p 5,5- middle-0f-the Road management
p 1,1- impoverished management
p 9,1- Authority- compliance management
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
96/113
high
low
low
high
Concern for results
Concer
n
forpeople
1,9 9,9
1,1 9,1
5,5
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
97/113
Situational theory
p Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard have developed aleadership model called situational leadershiptheory ( SLT)
p This is a contingency theory that focuses on the
followers.p The term readiness is given importance.
p The emphasis on the followers in leadershipeffectiveness reflects the reality that it is the
followers who accept or reject the leader.Regardless of what the leader does,effectiveness depends on the actions of his orher followers.
S
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
98/113
SLT
p Identify four specific leader behavior- from highlydirective to highly laissez-fair.
p Follower is unable and unwilling to do a task leader needs to give clear and specific
directionsp Follower unable and willing leader needs todisplay high task orientation to compensate forthe followers lack of ability and highrelationship orientation.
p Follower able and unwilling- leader supportiveand participative style
p Follower able and willing leader doesnt has todo much
p
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
99/113
S
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
100/113
Stress
p Stress is a dynamic condition in which anindividual is confronted with anopportunity , constraints or demandrelated to what he or she desires and forwhich the outcome is perceived to beboth uncertain and important.
p Stress is not necessarily bad in and of
itself.p Stress is associated with constraints and
demands
P t ti l S f t
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
101/113
Potential Source of stress
p Environment factorsp Organizational factors
p Individual factors s
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
102/113
Model of stress
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
103/113
Model of stress
Environment factors Economic uncertaintyPolitical uncertainty
Technological uncertainty
Org factorsTask and role demandInterpersonal demand
Org structureOrg leadership
Org life stages
Individual factorsFamily problems
Economic problems
Personality
Individual differences-Perception
Job experienceSocial support
Belief in locus of control
Self- efficacyhostility
Experienced stressed
Physiological symptomHeadaches
High blood pressureHeart disease
Psychological symptomAnxiety
Depression
Decrease in job satisfacti
Behavioral SymptomsProductivityAbsenteeism
turnover
M i t
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
104/113
Managing stress
p Individual Approachp Organizational Approach
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
105/113
ChangeManagement
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
106/113
p Organizational change is a complexphenomenon.
p There is a distinction between changing
reality , which is a continuous process,and changing perception, which isessentially a sporadic process.
p we need to become the driver of change
rather than being nailed by themultiplicity of influence that a change ofexternal circumstances can wield.
S ti l P
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
107/113
Sequential Process
p Initiationp Motivation
p Diagnosis
p Information collectionp Deliberation
p Action proposal
p Implementationp Stabilisation
p
M i R l
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
108/113
Main Role
p Corporate managementp Consultant(s)
p Counterpart
p Chief implementerp Implementation team
p Task forces
C t t
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
109/113
Corporate management
p Legitimizing functionp Energizing function
p Communicating function
p Gate-keeping function
Consultant
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
110/113
Consultant
p Implanting functionp Transcending function
p Function of generating alternatives
p Process facilitating functionp Shock absorbing function
p Resource sharing function
p Resource building functionp Self-liquidating function
Implementation Team
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
111/113
Implementation Team
p Collaboration building functionp Gate- keeping function
p Reviewing function
p Policy formulating function
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
112/113
Sources of resistance andcoping Mechanisms
8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09
113/113
coping Mechanisms
Sources of resistancep Perceived peripherality of
change.
p Perception of imposition.
p
Indifference of the topmanagement.
p Vested interests
p Complacency inertia
p Fear of large scaledisturbance .
p Fear of inadequate resources
p Fear of obsolescence
p Fear of loss of power
Coping mechanismsp Participation in diagnosis
p Participation andinvolvement.
p Active support from thetop
p Phasing of change
p Support of resources
p Development of skills
p Role redefinition and re-orientation
p Role clarity and definition
Recommended