View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
New Policy Direction on Growth Management
Presented by: Kerry Godwin, Planning and Design DirectorOsceola County Community Development
Osceola County Planning CommissionWorkshop
May 26th, 2020
A clear Vision+ a strong Comprehesive Plan+ enforced by a complete LDC= Higher Quality Development Goals
Good Land Use Planning supported by strong Transportation Planning makes the DRI requirements redundant.
Or how Osceola County stopped relying upon the DRI processes and regional regulatory agencies to handle their growth management issues.
2006-2007 Urban Land Institute Panel
7
Impact of the Real Estate Boom
Lake Toho – 5 proposed DRIs 32,000 housing units 3.7 million square feet retail 840,000 square feet industrial
ULI Findings/Recommendations Remaining rural is not an option Recommended a vision for
growth Mixed-use communities Multimodal transportation
2006-2007 Comprehensive Land Amendment Future Land Use
Comprehensive Plan Update
Instituted an Urban Growth Boundary• Clear separation of urban and
rural• Directs growth to urban areaIntroduced the Mixed Use Districts (MXDs)• Embody Plan’s growth principles• Higher densities, intensities• Mixed uses designated areas• Highly connected road network• Multimodal transportation• Balance of jobs and housing
34
2010 Evaluation and Appraisal Report
Extended Planning Horizon to 2025.
Added three Conceptual Master Plan for MXD Districts.
Deleted all Redundancies within Elements.
Deleted all References to Specific State Agencies.
34
2010-2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Mixed Use Districts (MXDs)
Conceptual Master Plans adopted• East of Lake Toho• South Lake Toho• Northeast District
MXD Land Development Code• Place types and land uses• Density and intensity• Road connectivity• Urban form34
2010-2013 Land Development Code
34
Restructured Land Development CodeChanged framework of code for ease of use From 22 chapters to 5 Added Siting Standards to Use Table Eliminated 100+ Conditional Uses Added limited Architectural standards Introduced Special areas standards
Narcoossee OverlayMixed Use Districts
Land Development Code
Chapter 1 Administration, Boards, and Committees
Chapter 2 Development Processes and Procedures
Chapter 3 Performance and Siting Standards
Chapter 4 Site Design and Development Standards
Chapter 5 Vested Rights Determinations
2009TransportationStudies
Cluster Development Study Existing Centers Proposed Centers Potential Centers Transportation and Transit
Patterns Included Cities
34
Update Transportation Analyses Zones (TAZ)October 2009
42
Transportation Vision
2010-2011 Identified Regional
Multi-lane Facilities (Red)
Proposed New boulevard designations and expansion
Introduced Avenues for moving local traffic
Created an interconnected Grid
Lessened reliance on regional transportation Systems
34
HB 7207 (2011) Established favorable language for Mobility Fees)Established Mobility Plans and associated Mobility Fees as a principle means: Equitably mitigate its transportation impact Fund multimodal improvements.
The intent of the Mobility Fee is to: Streamline Simplify Allows greater flexibility In urban areas (§163.3168(2), F.S.)
i. Urban service area designations,ii. Urban growth boundaries, andiii. Mixed-use, high- density development
11
Transportation Funding Study 2011 - 2012
Transportation Network Costs
Capital & Operations & Maintenance Roadways Transit Bicycles/Pedestrian/Trails
Revenues Ad Valorem Gas Tax Sales Tax User Fees
34
Repeal of Impact Fee OrdinanceSeptember 2012
Reviewed the unintended consequences of the existing policies:
Incentivized Residential Development with similar fees.
Penalized Small Businesses/Start-Ups.
Lost more jobs to the region. As very little Impact Fee revenue
was being generated, it did not affect the overall roadway projects.
34
New Dedicated Funding Mechanisms (Funding Source #1) November 2012
New Growth Properties: Contribute 33%
Other Properties: Contribute 18.2%
34
Transportation Element – 2025 & 2040August 2013Worked with DEO for Extended Time Frame for Map Series to match MetroPlan Planning Horizon and eases funding opportunities. Introduced New Roadway Types of Multimodal Corridor, Boulevards, Avenues, Roadways.
34
Land Development Code Update - 2014Implements new Transportation Approach
34
DRI Exemption - November 2013
34
November 8, 2013
Mr. Mik e McDanielComprehensiveve PlanningManagerFlorida Department of Economic Opportunity Caldwell Building l07 E. Madison Street Tallhassee,Florida 32399
DEPARTMENT O F Re: FLoridaStatutes 2013, 380.06 (29) (c) l. And 3&0.06 (29) ( c) 3. COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT Dear Mr. McDaniel:
Th.i.s letteris offeredas a courtesy to your office to detail Osceola County's qualifications for exemptions applicable for Dcn,_1e Urban Land Areas (DULA)
DAVE TOMEK The County qualifies under Florida Statues,Section380.06 (29) (c)sub 1 &sub 3. ADMINISTRATOR which states in pertinent part;
2013 Florida Statutes380.06 Development o f Regional Impact.(29) EXEMPTIONS FOR DENSE URBAN LAND AREAS.
(c) If a county that doesnot qualityas a dense u rban land areadesignate any of the following areas in its comprehensive plan, anyproposeddevelopment within the designated area is exemptfrom thedevelopment-of-regional-impact process:
1. Urban infill as definedin s. 163.3164 l, Urban infill and redevelloppment under s.163.2517; or 3. Ur ban Serviceareas a defined in s. 163.3 163
2013 Florida Statutes163.. 3164 Community Planning Act; definitions. k-As usedin this act:(50) "Urban servicearea" means areasidentified in the comprehensiveplan where public facilitiesand services, including but not limited to,central water and sewer capacity and roads. arealready in ploc;.o or areidentified in the, comprehensive plan a urbanservice areas, regardless of local government limitation.
Osceola County has established an Urban Growth Boundary within our Comprehensive Plan (Objective 1.1-Future Land Use Elemen t). Further Policy
Osceola I.I.I and 1.1.l identify additional characteristics of the UGBthat mark this area as
County having infrastructure already in place or to be in placewithin the planning horizonof the ComprehensivePlan. ThesePolicies and Objective meet the requirements or
l 1 COURTHOUSE S- QUARE SUITE 1100F.S. 380.06(29) (c.) 1 & 3. In addition, P.S. 163.3164 (50) p.-ovidn the necessary definitional identificationto show the UGBas anestablished Urban Service Area.
KISSIMMEE
PH: 407-742-020FL 34741
0 FAX: 407-742-0206www.osceola.org
Rick Scott GOVERNOR DEO Jesse Pa11uccio
Executive Director
FLORIDA DEPARTMENTECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
November 7. 2014
Kerry Godwin Director, Planning and Zoning Osceo la County 1 Courthouse SquareSuite 1100 Kissimmee., Florida 34741
Dear Mr. Godwin:
Recently the Coun ty requested the Department confirm the COunty's in terpretation t hat theu rban Growth Boundary (UGB) adopted in the Com prehensive Plan functions as an urban servicearea as defi ned In Section 163.3164(50), Florida Statutes (F.5.), thus exempting develo pment s within i t from development of regionalimpact (DRI) process pursuantto 380.06(29)(c)3., F.S.ThedDepartment concurs with the County t hat the UGB functions as an urban service area and thatthis areais exempt fro m DRI review.
An a Richmond ChiefBureau of Community Planning
AR/
Enclosure: OsceolaCounty Letter Dated No vem b er 8, 2013
cc : Hugh Harling, PE, Executive Director, East Central Florida Regional Planning CouncilNancv Linnan Esq., Carlton Fields Jordon Burt (via email)
, ... ,,L,,,.,,.,.,.1,.., .rr rl,.; \·; ._ .-.• • IJ .ll-.c L, l•1.>l ••t I~' • t J:'"4
::.;.;. :t•r . • :.I~~· ·., .;H ~ ..... ..Li ' · ,l, • r I ,., .. ,-·., " · I•.-. -... 'ct :f '"'::'1 1 _,-:t. )~·•
Developments of Regional ImpactIn 2012, there were 28 DRIs. 2012: -1 Abandonment2013: -1 Rescission
-1 Expiration2014: -3 Rescission
-1 Expiration2015: -1 Rescission
-1 Essentially B/O2016: -5 Rescission
-1 Annexation2017: -1 Rescission2018: -1 Expiration2019: -1 RescissionAs of 2019, there are 10 DRIs remaining. (12-Rescissions, 3-Expirations, 1-Abandonment,1-EBO, and 1-Annexation)34
Transportation Ad Hoc Committee completes Funding RecommendationsMay 2012 - 2014
Mobility Fee Study Move forward with referendum on implementation of
Charter County Surtax (Delayed) Work with Cities of Kissimmee and St. Cloud on
partnership agreements Establish non-partisan oversight board to insure that tax
payer dollars are not wasted (Delayed) Establish transportation funding education program for
citizens (Website) 2nd Option Fuel Tax
16
Second Local Option Fuel Tax (Funding Source #2)March 2015
34
Mobility Fee Adopted (Funding Source #3) March 16, 2015 - Mobility Fee Ordinance AdoptedOctober 1, 2015 – Reduced Rate Fee EffectiveJanuary 1, 2016 – Full Rate Fee Effective June 20, 2016 – Amended Mobility Fee Ordinance Included Corporate Headquarters Allowed Transfer of Excess FeesApril 17, 2017 - Amended Mobility Fee Ordinance Revised Mixed Use Development DefinitionJanuary 8, 2018 - Amended Mobility Fee Ordinance Added Average Construction Cost of Roadway Tied Annual Increase to National Highway
Construction Cost Index Payment Due at Time of Building Permit
34
2014 Fire & Recue Element Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Used TAZ Data for Population Projection
Established Levels of Service.
Projected Future Station Locations.
Developed Prototypical Station Design and Costs.
Raised Impact Fees to today’s costs.
Have built 3 new stations since 2014.
Parks and Recreation Element 2015 -2018
Phase I – 2015 Existing Parks Evaluation Benchmarking of Parks LOS, Operation
and FundingPhases 2 & 3 – 2016-2018 Public Involvement Process Calculation of future needs – 2025 &
2040 Development of Parks Prototypes CIP future needs Recommendation of Comprehensive
Plan PolicesPhase 4 – 2018 Adopt New Parks & Recreation Element Draft and Adopt new Parks Impact Fee
34
Parks Master Planning Process Community Park Prototype
Used TAZ Data for Population Projection
2017 Sustainability Report
Approached in 3 phases: Fiscal sustainability Affordable housing Jobs/housing balance
34
Taxable Value
2005
$5.2 M Office: 75,000 square feet
Residential: 300 units
Retail/Restaurants: 370,000 square feet
Shopping
center
renovation
Property assembly
and redevelopment
Single site
redevelopment
New
townhomes
Taxable Value
2005
$5.2 M
Taxable Value
2010
$42 M
Taxable Value
2018
$94 M
Single site
redevelopment
Sin
gle
site re
develo
pm
ent
Restaurant
renovation
Retail
renovation
Connectivity supports Sustainability
Supports Neighborhood to Neighborhood Access.
Allows local traffic to avoid Framework Roadways.
Better access for school transportation.
Better access for Fire & Rescue.
34
2017 EAR Comprehensive Plan AmendmentData & Analysis Study
E-Commerce Lifestyle Authentic experiences New forms of centers Small-scale Neighborhood Centers Natural and agrarian settings Flexibility built-in Commercial floor area shrinking Third Spaces Groceries still anchor Regional Urban Centers as magnets Higher Density necessary to support
retail34
Reserved areas to ensure balanced growth.Beginning to restore road network connectivity.Development occurring in MXD areas and Urban Infill Centers.Variety of housing product types.Development at Tupperware SunRail station – higher density/intensity, connectivity at station.Processes developed to work with school district and fire departments – integrating school and fire department planning with development and into Centers as Urban footprints.
EAR Comprehensive Plan Results - 2019
EAR Update – Future Land Use Element - 2019Greenfield Development Area–Employment Center
34
Aerial Analysis
Future Land Use Designation
EAR Update – Future Land Use Element - 2019Infill Development Area-Urban Center
34
Aerial Analysis
Future Land Use Designation
Land Development Code - 2019
Established Centers in LDC Neighborhood Community Urban Employment
Established development standards Mix of uses Form of Development Architectural
34
Customer Service remains Priority #1! Continuosly revamping Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Land Development
Applications for expedited reviews and processing while increasing development standards.
Utilizing the new Comprehensive Plan has a real planning tool. Revamped transportation funding to take place through three revenue sources:
dedicated ad valorem tax, enacted mobility fee, later raised the fees and implemented additional gas tax.
Utilize strong liaison through land development working group, Transportation Funding Advisory Group and Moratorium Focus Group before implementing Mobility Fees.
Expediting construction of multimodal transportation network with private land development introducing Developer Agreements for roadway construction in advance of collection of Mobility Fees.
How is it working so far?
Recommended