View
3
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Before you start:We advise that you fill in this form offline in a Word Document first as there is no save and return functionality.
DfE will not accept applications sent through by email. All applications must be made through the online portal linked to from the gov.uk page.
You can find instructions on how to fill in this form linked to on the online application screen. This document includes some example answers that may help.
Applicant's organisation details
1. What type of organisation are you: Teaching School: ☒Multi-Academy Trust: ☐Local Authority: ☐Other: ☐ (If other please specify below)Click or tap here to enter text.
2. What is the name of your organisation? Mid Suffolk Teaching Alliance.
3. If you are a Teaching School, what is your URN?
Please ensure you enter this correctly as this will be used to obtain the details of your school. If you do not know the URN you can search for it on the Edubase website.
136416
4. If you are a Multi-Academy Trust, what is your Companies House Number?
07467445
5. If you are a Local Authority, what is your LA code?
Click or tap here to enter text.
6. Where are you located? Suffolk RSC Region: Eastern
Applicant’s contact details
7. Please give us the name and contact details (email and telephone number) for a single point of contact to correspond with.
This person will need to email any supporting documents required to us separate to this form. They will also need to be contactable over the summer in case of further information being required.
Julia Upton 01728 860 213jupton@debenhamhigh.co.uk
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Senior Responsible Officer
8. Please confirm the name, position and contact details for the Senior Responsible Office for this application:
This named individual must be in a position to be able to commit your organisation to be accountable for this application. This means for schools the person submitting this application must be the Head Teacher; for MATs this must be the CEO/accounting officer; for LAs this must be either the Director or the Assistant Director for Children’s Services.
Julia Upton
9. Bank account details of the applicant to be paid
This information is required to make payment of the grant for the activities stated in the application if successful.
Even if you have already registered your bank account details with DfE, you will still need to fill them in here.
Please note that the bank details you specify here need to be those for the account you would like funding to be paid into. Other bank details you have previously submitted will not be changed by this application.
Organisation name: Mid Suffolk Teaching School Alliance
Address:
DEBENHAM HIGH SCHOOL GRACECHURCH STREET DEBENHAM STOWMARKET SUFFOLK IP14 6BL
Post Code: IP14 6B
Telephone no: 01728 860 213
Remittance E-mail addressjupton@debenhamhigh.co.uk
finance@debenhamhigh.co.uk
Account name: Debenham High School
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Bank/Building Society Name: Lloyds Bank plc
Bank Address: 16 Gentleman’s Walk, Norwich
Bank Postcode: NR2 1LZ
Sort code: 30-96-17
Account no: 46323168
Roll number: N/A
Provider details:You will need to have secured the provider(s) of support before submitting your application. Please list the name and type of every provider organisation used in the delivery of this application.
Provider organisation name: 5 Rivers
Type of organisation: ☒National Support School ☐School ☐Local Authority ☐Multi-Academy Trust ☐Private sector organisation ☐Third sector organisation ☐Other ☐
Provider organisation name: Teaching School ConnectED
Type of organisation: ☒National Support School ☐School ☐Local Authority ☐Multi-Academy Trust ☐Private sector organisation ☐Third sector organisation ☐Other ☐
Provider organisation name: Teaching School Encompass
Type of organisation: ☒National Support School ☐School ☐Local Authority ☐Multi-Academy Trust ☐Private sector organisation ☐Third sector organisation ☐
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Other ☐
Provider organisation name: Teaching School Farlingaye and Kesgrave
Type of organisation: ☒National Support School ☐School ☐Local Authority ☐Multi-Academy Trust ☐Private sector organisation ☐Third sector organisation ☐Other ☐
Provider organisation name: Teaching School Springfield Junior School
Type of organisation: ☐National Support School ☐School ☐Local Authority ☐Multi-Academy Trust ☐Private sector organisation ☐Third sector organisation ☐Other ☐
Provider organisation name: Teaching School Primary East (Formerly SANTSA)
Type of organisation: ☒National Support School ☐School ☐Local Authority ☐Multi-Academy Trust ☐Private sector organisation ☐Third sector organisation ☐Other ☐
Provider organisation name: Teaching School Suffolk Borders
Type of organisation: ☒National Support School ☐School ☐Local Authority ☐Multi-Academy Trust ☐Private sector organisation ☐Third sector organisation ☐Other ☐
Provider organisation name:
Type of organisation: ☒
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
National Support School ☐School ☐Local Authority ☐Multi-Academy Trust ☐Private sector organisation ☐Third sector organisation ☐Other ☐
Provider organisation name: Teaching School Teaching School CASSA
Type of organisation: ☒National Support School ☐School ☐Local Authority ☐Multi-Academy Trust ☐Private sector organisation ☐Third sector organisation ☐Other ☐
Provider organisation name: Teaching School Suffolk Primary Heads Association- SPHA
Type of organisation: ☐National Support School ☐School ☐Local Authority ☐Multi-Academy Trust ☐Private sector organisation ☐Third sector organisation ☐Other ☒ Headteacher Association
Provider organisation name: Teaching School Suffolk Association of Secondary Heads -SASH
Type of organisation: ☒National Support School ☐School ☐Local Authority ☐Multi-Academy Trust ☐Private sector organisation ☐Third sector organisation ☐Other ☒ Headteacher Association
Provider organisation name: The Ashley School Academy Trust
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Type of organisation: ☐National Support School ☒School ☐Local Authority ☐Multi-Academy Trust ☐Private sector organisation ☐Third sector organisation ☐Other ☐
Provider organisation name: The Lark
Type of organisation: ☒National Support School ☒School ☐Local Authority ☐Multi-Academy Trust ☐Private sector organisation ☐Third sector organisation ☐Other ☐
Provider organisation name: Teaching School Teaching School Teaching School West Ipswich
Type of organisation: ☒National Support School ☒School ☐Local Authority ☐Multi-Academy Trust ☐Private sector organisation ☐Third sector organisation ☐Other ☐
Schools in receipt of support In the table below, please complete the relevant information about the schools which will
benefit from support through this application.
We expect a minimum of 4 schools to be supported by each application. There is no limit to
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
the number of schools that can be supported in each application, however, at least 70% of the schools supported through any one application must meet at least one of the eligibility criteria outlined on the GOV.UK page for this fund.
In the table below, please include the reference number(s) for the eligibility criteria (do not write it out in full) e.g. E1, E2 etc.
If a school meets multiple criteria, please include all of these in the table below.
Please note: All schools listed must have given their explicit agreement to receive the proposed support.
Other schools beyond those mentioned above (please include the School names, URNs, phase of education, type of school, eligibility criteria met, and whether they have explicitly agreed to be supported by you)
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Scho
ol n
ame
Scho
ol U
niqu
e Re
fere
nce
No.
P
hase
of E
duca
tion
Scho
ol ty
pe (s
ee
sepa
rate
list
of
abbr
evia
tions
use
d in
the
Q
ualif
ying
Sch
ools
O
ppor
tuni
ty A
rea
E1
Inad
eqau
te E
2
B
elow
Flo
or E
3
Coa
sting
E3
two
cons
ecuti
ve R
I E4
Wati
ng n
otice
s in
last
3
year
s E5
Scho
ol n
ot re
achi
ng K
S5
min
stan
dard
s E6
Pro
gres
s 8 b
elow
-0.2
5 E7
E
8
E9
Chantry Academy 138373 11-16 AC yes OA Yes yes Copleston High School 136827 11-18 ACC yes OA Ipswich Academy 136453 11-18 AC yes OA Ormiston Endeavour Academy 137674 11-16 AC yes OA St Alban's Catholic High School 137849 11-18 ACC yes OA yes Yes yes Stoke High School - Ormiston Academy 140032 11-16 AC yes OA Yes yes Stone Lodge Academy 141407 5-16 ACS yes OA The Bridge School 124909 2-19 CYS yes OA Thomas Wolsey School 137838 3-16 ACCS yes OA Westbourne Academy 139288 11-16 ACC yes OA C yes yes Yes yes Beccles Free School 138274 11-16 F yes yesBury St Edmunds County Upper School 136990 13-18 ACC yes yes Castle Manor Academy 138162 11-18 ACC yes yes Yes yes Felixstowe Academy 137321 11-19 AC yes C yes yes Yes yes King Edward VI 124856 13-18 VC yes Yes yes Mildenhall College Academy 139867 11-18 ACC yes yes Ormiston Denes Academy 139403 11-16 AC yes BF C yes Yes yes Pakefield School 136438 11-16 FD yes Yes yes Priory School 137433 7-19 ACCS yes yesStowmarket High School 124818 11-18 CY yes yes yesThe Ashley School Academy Trust 137459 7-16 ACCS yes yesThe Benjamin Britten High School 124851 11-16 CY yes yes Yes yes Thurston Community College 124802 11-18 CY yes Yes yes
Supported Schools Eligibility Criteria
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Eligible schools Criteria Met
SCH
OO
L N
AM
E
UR
N
AG
E R
AN
GE
NFT
YPE
Mee
ts C
riter
ia
Opp
ortu
nity
Are
a E1
Inad
eqau
te
E
2
Bel
ow F
loor
or
coas
ting
E3
RI
in 2
con
secu
tive
Ofs
ted
E4
War
ning
Not
ices
in
last
two
year
s E
5
E10
E11
E12
Abbot's Hall Community Primary School 124631 4-11 CY yes yes yes yes
Acton Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124686 4-11 VC yes C yesAll Saints Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School, New market124761 4-11 VA yes yesBardw ell Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124687 5-11 VC yes yesBarningham Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124689 4-11 VC yes yesBeaumont Community Primary School 133605 5-11 CY yes yes
Beccles Primary Academy 142017 3-11 AC yes yes yes yes
Beck Row Primary School 124541 4-11 CY yes yes BF yes yesBedfield Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124720 4-11 VC yes yesBosmere Community Primary School 124674 3-11 CY yes yesBrampton CofE VC Primary School 124724 4-11 VC yes yesBritannia Primary School and Nursery 124653 4-11 CY yes OA yes yes
Bucklesham Primary School 124572 4-11 CY yes yesBurton End Primary Academy 141546 3-11 ACC yes yes yes
Carlton Colville Primary School 124574 3-11 CY yes yes
Castle Hill Junior School 141373 7-11 AC yes OA yes yes yes
Causton Junior School 124580 7-11 CY yes OA yes yes yes
Cedarw ood Primary School 131962 5-11 CY yes yesCharsfield Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124725 4-11 VC yes yesChelmondiston Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124755 4-11 VC yes C yesChilton Community Primary School 124622 3-11 CY yes BF yes yes yes
Clare Community Primary School 124533 4-11 CY yes yesClements Community Primary School 124556 3-11 CY yes BF yes yes yes yes
Cliff Lane Primary School 141591 3-11 ACC yes OA yes yesClifford Road Primary School 124654 3-11 CY yes OA yes
Cockfield Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124694 5-11 VC yes yesColdfair Green Community Primary School 124629 4-11 CY yes yesColneis Junior School 124624 7-11 CY yes yes
Combs Ford Primary School 124576 4-11 CY yes yes yes yes
Copdock Primary School 124577 5-11 CY yes BF yesCoupals Primary Academy 141371 4-11 AC yes yes yes yes
Craw ford's Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124733 4-11 VC yes yesDale Hall Community Primary School 124668 5-11 CY yes OA
Dell Primary School 124638 3-11 CY yes yes yes yes
Dennington Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124728 5-11 VC yes yesEdgar Sew ter Community Primary School 124585 3-11 CY yes C yes yesElm Tree Community Primary School 124642 4-11 CY yes yes yes yes
Elmsw ell Community Primary School 124534 3-11 CY yes BF yes
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Exning Primary School 124544 4-11 CY yes yesForest Academy 136316 3-11 ACC yes yes yes yes
Freeman Community Primary School 124612 4-11 CY yes yesGlade Primary School 124563 4-11 CY yes yesGlemsford Primary Academy 141406 2-11 AC yes yes yes yes
Grange Community Primary School 124630 3-11 CY yes yesGreat Barton Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124697 5-11 VC yes Bf yesGreat Heath Academy 142027 3-11 AC yes yes yes yes
Great Waldingfield Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School124699 4-11 VC yes yesGrove Primary School 140823 3-11 AC yes yes yes
Gunton Community Primary School 124677 3-11 CY yes yes
Gusford Community Primary School 139803 4-11 AC yes OA yes yes
Hadleigh Community Primary School 124559 3-11 CY yes yes
Halifax Primary School 124670 4-11 CY yes OA yes
Handford Hall Primary School 124643 3-11 CY yes OA yes
Hardw ick Middle School 124839 9-13 CY yes yes yes
Hartest Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124701 4-11 VC yes yesHeath Primary School, Kesgrave 124593 3-11 CY yes yes
Hillside Primary School 140887 3-11 AC yes OA yes yes yes
Holton St Peter Community Primary School 124590 4-11 CY yes yesHonington Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124702 5-11 VC yes yesHorringer Court Middle School 137179 9-13 ACC yes C yes yes yes
Houldsw orth Valley Primary School 124546 4-11 CY yes yes yesHow ard Middle School 124801 9-13 CY yes yes yes yes
Ilketshall St Law rence School 124592 4-11 CY yes yesIxw orth Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124704 3-11 VC yes yesKelsale Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124735 4-11 VC yes yesKessingland Church of England Primary Academy 141172 3-11 AC yes yes yes yes
Kingsfleet Primary School 124627 4-11 CY yes yes yesKyson Primary School 124628 3-11 CY yes yes
Lakenheath Community Primary School 124539 4-11 CY yes yes yes
Langer Primary Academy 138117 4-11 AC yes yes
Laureate Community Primary School and Nursery 124545 3-11 CY yes yesLeiston Primary School 141554 3-11 ACC yes yes yes yes
Meadow Primary Academy 141983 3-11 AC yes BF yes yes yes
Mellis Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124737 5-11 VC yes yesMendham Primary School 124598 3-11 CY yes yesMendlesham Community Primary School 124599 4-11 CY yes yesMiddleton Community Primary School 124600 4-11 CY yes yes
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Morland Church of England VA Primary School 141125 3-11 VA yes OA yes yes
Murrayfield Community Primary School 124649 3-11 CY yes OA BF yes yes
Northf ield St Nicholas Primary Academy 142016 3-11 AC yes yes yes
Norton CEVC Primary School 124710 4-11 VC yes yesOld New ton Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124739 4-11 VC yes yesOulton Broad Primary School 124676 3-11 CY yes yes
Pakefield Primary School 141640 3-11 ACC yes yes yes
Piper's Vale Community Primary School 132836 3-11 CY yes OA C yes yes yes
Place Farm Primary Academy 138161 4-11 ACC yes yes yes
Poplars Community Primary School 124639 3-11 CY yes yes
Pot Kiln Primary School 124536 3-11 CY yes yes
Priory School 137433 7-19 ACCS yes yesRanelagh Primary School 124645 3-11 CY yes OA yes
Rattlesden Church of England Voluntary Controlled School 124711 4-11 VC yes yesRavensw ood Community Primary School 124650 3-11 CY yes OA yes
Red Oak Primary School 140573 3-11 AC yes yes yes
Reydon Primary School 141702 3-11 AC yes yesRingshall School 124604 4-11 CY yes BF yesRiverw alk School 124902 2-19 CYS yes yesRoman Hill Primary School 124634 3-11 CY yes C yes yes
Rose Hill Primary School 124655 4-11 CY yes OA
Rougham Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124756 5-11 VC yes yes yesRushmere Hall Primary School 124679 3-11 CY yes yes
Saxmundham Primary School 124605 4-11 CY yes yes
Shotley Community Primary School 124606 4-11 CY yes BF yesSidegate Primary School 140822 4-11 AC yes yes
Sir Robert Hitcham Church of England Voluntary Aided School 124774 4-11 VA yes yesSnape Community Primary School 124607 4-11 CY yes yesSouthw old Primary School 124610 4-11 CY yes yes yesSpringfield Junior School 124657 7-11 CY yes OA
Sprites Primary Academy 141985 4-11 AC yes OA yes yes
St Benet's Catholic Primary School 124778 5-11 VA yes yesSt Christopher's CEVCP School 124716 4-11 VC yes BF yesSt Edmund's Catholic Primary School 142770 4-11 AC yes BF
St Edmund's Primary School 124591 3-11 CY yes yesSt Felix Roman Catholic Primary School, Haverhill 124769 3-11 VA yes yesSt Gregory Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124757 3-11 VC yes yes
St Helen's Primary School 141819 3-11 ACC yes OA yes
St James CofE VA Middle School 124862 9-13 VA yes yes
St Joseph's Roman Catholic Primary School 124763 4-11 VA yes yes yes
St Margaret's Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School, Ipsw ich124782 4-11 VA yes OA yesSt Margaret's Primary Academy 141984 3-11 AC yes OA BF yes yes
St Mark's Catholic Primary School, Ipsw ich 124786 5-11 VA yes OA
St Mary's Church of England Academy 137419 4-11 ACC yes yes yes yes
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
St Mary's Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School, Hadleigh 124760 3-11 VA yes yes
St Mary's Roman Catholic Primary School 124780 4-11 VA yes yesSt Matthew 's Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School, Ipsw ich124783 4-11 VA yes OA yes
St Pancras Catholic Primary School, Ipsw ich 124785 5-11 VA yes OA
Stanton Community Primary School 124547 3-11 CY yes yesStoke-by-Nayland Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School124713 3-11 VC yes yesStone Lodge Academy 141407 5-16 ACS yes OA yesStutton Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124743 4-11 VC yes yesTattingstone Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124744 4-11 VC yes yesThe Albert Pye Community Primary School 124570 3-11 CY yes yes yes
The Ashley School Academy Trust 137459 7-16 ACCS yes yesThe Bridge School 124909 2-19 CYS yes yesThe Oaks Community Primary School 141842 3-11 ACC yes OA yes
The Willow s Primary School 124669 3-11 CY yes OA yes
Thomas Wolsey School 137838 3-16 ACCS yes OA
Thorndon Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124745 5-11 VC yes yes yesTrimley St Martin Primary School 124614 4-11 CY yes yesTrimley St Mary Primary School 124613 4-11 CY yes yesTudor Church of England Primary School, Sudbury 142026 4-11 AC yes yes yes
Walsham-le-Willow s Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School124717 5-11 VC yes yesWarren School 124905 3-19 CYS yes yesWells Hall Community Primary School 124558 3-11 CY yes yes yes yes
West Row Community Primary School 124542 4-11 CY yes BF/C yesWestfield Primary Academy 140044 3-11 AC yes yesWestley Middle School 137180 9-13 ACC yes yes yes yes
Westw ood Primary School 139804 2-11 AC yes yes yes
Wetheringsett Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School 124746 4-11 VC yes yesWhitehouse Community Primary School 124660 3-11 CY yes OA yes yes
Whitton Community Primary School 141849 3-11 ACC yes OA yes yes yes
Witnesham Primary School 124618 4-11 CY yes yesWoodhall Community Primary School 124560 3-11 CY yes yes yes yes
Woods Loke Community Primary School 124641 3-11 CY yes yes
Woolpit Community Primary School 124549 5-11 CY yes yes
Details of application
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Overview
1. Title (short title for your project): Teaching School Suffolk Schools’ Peer review system to strengthen leadership and improve pupil outcomes
2. Brief summary of your application:(max. 1,000 characters)
This is a collaborative bid led by the Mid Suffolk Teaching School Alliance working with the Suffolk School to School Support Partnership, which comprises all Suffolk’s Teaching School Alliances, National Support Schools and Headteacher Associations.
We intend to develop a robust Peer to Peer Review system focussed on strengthening leadership to address widespread underachievement in Suffolk schools, particularly in relation to the outcomes for disadvantaged and SEND pupils.
Through the process of Peer Review and challenge we will develop leadership skills in schools and across schools, so impacting on student outcomes through improved staff motivation, teaching and learning and the use of evidence based interventions (see The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes - Christopher Day, Qing Gu, Pam Sammons 2016).
This project to be of a scale and nature to bring about sustainable improvement across all Suffolk schools and embed a strong culture of collaboration and shared accountability.
Financials
3. How much funding for this application are you seeking (£)? (We expect the average application to be for between £100,000 - £500,000, but there are no set limits)
427,900
4. What funding, if any, for this activity are you intending to secure from other sources, and how much?
We are supporting the application with human resources from the Heads’ Associations
5. Are you, or any other entity that is party to this application in receipt of, or have applied
YES ☐ NO ☒ Click or tap here to enter text.
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
for, other sources of funding for the same activity (if so, what, and where does it originate)?6. How have you ensured value for money? (max 1,500 characters)
We will use External QA and scrutiny by the Suffolk School to School Partnership. We will work with other local headteacher associations to provide reciprocal arrangements (or paid external consultants) to monitor the effectiveness of our systems and processes. We have embodied the National Audit Office model to ensure value for money.
Economy: spending lessEfficiency: spending wellEffectiveness: spending wiselyEquity: spending fairly
For the sum requested we will be covering 161 eligible primary schools and 24 secondary schools ensuring equity by including all eligible schools in Suffolk. In addition, all teaching school alliances in the county are involved in this bid so will all have an equitable involvement in the project and the benefits they gain from it.We have considered working with Challenge Partners but their costs would have been prohibitive (approx. £657,000 per year) and have therefore constructed a locally led approach that costs less. We believe that this will also mean that we are spending wisely and well because the long-term impact of the project will be to build a large cohort of school leaders skilled in peer review which will ensure we can embed this locally and scale it further and sustain it in a low-cost way that would just not be financially viable through other providers.
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Project Costs
We expect the ‘Application Development Cost’ to be no more than 20% of the total cost of the application. Application Development Costs are the costs incurred in writing this application. These could include the resource used in securing providers, and administrative time spent building the application and seeking the relevant approvals.
Please write up all of the associated costs for each term of delivery for your proposed activity. The sum of the total spend here will need to match the total funding requested in question 3 of the financials section.
7. Please indicate the estimated level of spend per term
Project Costs
Please indicate the estimated level of spend per term
Total spend
Application Development Cost
£ Term 1
Autumn 2017
£ Term 2
Spring 2018
£ Term 3
Summer 2018
£ Term 4
Autumn 2018
£ Term 5
Spring 2019
Delivery 20,000 91,000 65.000 65,000 65,000 3500 309,500
Administration 9000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 14,000
Project Management 18000 18000 18000 18000 18000 90,000
Travel and subsistence 900 900 900 900 900 900 5,400
Evaluation and monitoring (if included in the above please identify)
1000 1000 1000 1000 5000 9,000
Total spend 29,900 141,900 85,900 85,900 85,900 28,400 427,900
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
8. Breakdown of proposed provision over the lifetime of the application
The providers outlined below must match the providers you have previously listed on page 2 of this application.
What service is being provided (as per table above i.e. project management)
Name of provider (please complete a separate line for each provider)
Cost basis e.g. day rate, fixed period rate , agreed package
(£) per day or rate or agreed package
Total number of days required.
Number of people you will engage to deliver this (if applicable)
Total Cost
Drop down menu:
Delivery; administration; project management; T&S; Evaluation and monitoring
Project Management SASH/ Mid Suffolk Teaching Alliance
450 100 1 £45,000
Project Management SPHA/ Mid Suffolk Teaching Alliance
450 100 1 £45,000
Application Admin SASH, SPHA, 450 20 3 £9000
Admin Mid Suffolk Teaching Alliance
£1000 per term £5000
Training of 10 facilitators/Launch events for heads x4
Mid Suffolk Teaching Alliance/Relational Schools
20,000 5 £20,000
Leading Collaborative s of 12 schools and 4 triads. Initially 2 secondary and 5 primaries from the teaching schools listed above. £6300 for facilitating the Collaborative plus £200 for incidental expenses. £6500 for school improvement initiatives e.g. from EEF .
Teaching schools listed above and trained facilitators x 14 days (including monitoring)
13,000 per Collaborative x7
450 14 x 7 £91,000
As above but expanding to another 1 secondary, 1 special/AP and 3 primaries
Teaching schools listed above
13,000 per Collaborative x5
£65,000
As above but expanding to another 5 primaries
Teaching schools listed above
13,000 per Collaborative x5
£65,000
As above but expanding to another 5 primaries
Teaching schools listed above
13,000 per Collaborative x5
£65,000
Review of learning events SASH, SPHA, Suffolk School to School Support Partnership
£3500
Evaluation and Monitoring visits
End of project review
External Heads reviews
£500 per day including Report
8 days
10 days
£4000
£5000
Action Plan/Timeline
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
9. Please state below the high level action plan in terms of main activities and milestones for the proposed intervention
Months Start date (dd/mm/yyyy)
End date (dd/mm/yyyy)
Main activity / Milestone
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that success of this activity will be measured against (max 500 characters)
Term 1 – Autumn 2017
4/9/17 24/10/17Project Set Up
Appoint project leads
Finalise protocols and admin
Produce data sets on 2017 results
Train 10 facilitators
Launch events Recruit first
collaborative cohort schools
Project set up and 84 schools recruited
27/10/17 9/2/18 Delivery of first cohort involving 2 secondary and 5 primary collaboratives.
Key activities include: “Before” head
teacher surveys carried out
2 collaborative meetings
Collaborative action plan agreed
School improvement initiatives agreed and implementation begun
“After” head teacher surveys
Review of quality of provision to inform future cohorts
At least 80% of cohort schools complete the first collaborative peer to peer review process.
80% of head teacher surveys show positive impact of the peer to peer review process.
Recruitment of schools to second collaborative cohort
60 schools recruited
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Term 2 – Spring 2018
3/1/18 29/3/18
Delivery of second cohort involving 1 secondary, 1 special/alternative provision and 3 primary collaboratives.
Key activities include: Pre-project
head teacher surveys carried out
2 collaborative meetings
Collaborative action plan agreed
School improvement initiatives agreed and implementation begun
“After” head teacher surveys
Review of quality of provision to inform future cohorts
At least 80% of cohort schools complete the second collaborative peer to peer review process.
80% of head teacher surveys show positive impact of the peer to peer review process.
Recruit 3rd cohort 60 schools recruitedReview of progress of first cohort against action plans
80% of showing improvement in areas identified in their action plans.
Term 3 – Summer 2018 16/4/18 24/7/18
Delivery of third cohort involving 5 primary collaboratives.
Key activities include: Pre-project
head teacher surveys carried out
2 collaborative meetings
Collaborative action plan agreed
School improvement initiatives agreed and implementatio
At least 80% of cohort schools complete the third collaborative peer to peer review process.
80% of head teacher surveys show positive impact of the peer to peer review process.
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
n begun “After” head
teacher surveys
Review of quality of provision to inform future cohorts
Recruitment of schools to fourth collaborative cohort
60 schools recruited
Review of progress of second cohort against action plans
80% of showing improvement in areas identified in their action plans.
Term 4 – Autumn 2018
5/9/18 19/12/18
Delivery of fourth cohort involving 5 primary collaboratives.
Key activities include: Pre-project
head teacher surveys carried out
2 collaborative meetings
Collaborative action plan agreed
School improvement initiatives agreed and implementation begun
“After” head teacher surveys
Review of quality of provision to inform future delivery after the end of this funded project
At least 80% of cohort schools complete the fourth collaborative peer to peer review process.
80% of head teacher surveys show positive impact of the peer to peer review process.
Review of progress of third cohort against action plans
80% of showing improvement in areas identified in their action plans.
Term 5 – Spring 2019
2/1/19 5/4/19
End of project review focused on:
Completion rate of schools
Delivery of end of project report showing:
At least 80% completion rate
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Impact on leadership evidenced through head teacher survey
Impact on any schools inspected by Ofsted during the project
Review of impact on pupil outcomes at KS2 & 4 for Cohorts 1 & 2.
No. of collaboratives sustained after initial term.
Quality of provision
At least 80% of head teachers have found the project has strengthened their leadership
Where schools are inspected, more are rated good/outstanding compared to previous rating.
Improvements in participant schools on Attainment 8, Progress 8 and end of key stage 2 outcomes with a specific focus on disadvantaged and SEND pupils.
90% of collaboratives sustained.
End of project communications
Delivery of events to cascade learning to other schools in Suffolk
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Programme of WorkPlease outline your proposed programme
In all of your answers below, please include any assumptions, risks/barriers to success, and supporting evidence.
1. Issue (max 1,500 characters) What is the issue that this intervention is aiming to solve? What are you trying to change and who will benefit? What baseline measures do you intend to improve?
The key issue is widespread underachievement in Suffolk schools, particularly in relation to the outcomes for disadvantaged and SEND pupils. More specifically, outcomes are below national average in reading, writing and mathematics (Maths is a particular problem) in 170 primary schools. In the Suffolk Secondary schools, 21 fall below the national benchmark for attainment 8 in Key Stage 4 and 29 below the EBacc national benchmark measures (out of 43 schools). Although the secondary sector shows reasonable progress at KS4 it is currently insufficient to reach National average attainment because of the low KS2 performance. English, Maths and Sciences are of particular concern.
We are trying to change outcomes for these pupils in eligible primary and secondary schools across Suffolk through strengthening leadership in schools and across schools. This project will be of a scale and nature to bring about sustainable improvement across all Suffolk schools.
These issues are highlighted in the recent Ofsted SEND report for Suffolk, Local Authority Strategy Plans and Suffolk Schools’ Ofsted reports, FFT analysis, RAISE online and School performance tables. The baseline measures we intend to improve are: Attainment 8, Progress 8 and end of Key Stage 2 outcomes, with a specific focus on disadvantaged and SEND pupils.
2. Output (max 1,500 characters) What are the planned activities and what evidence supports these as being likely to succeed? Who will deliver what and how will they be managed (please feel free to refer to your timeline in the previous section)?
Teaching Schools and National Support Schools will lead and develop head teacher peer to peer review collaboratives for primary, special/AP and secondary sectors. Each collaborative will involve 12 schools and through the peer review process, a shared action plan will be developed and have access to funds to implement evidence-based initiatives, specific their needs. Collaboratives will have external support and challenge from a trained facilitator. In total we will deliver 18 Primary, 3 Secondary and 1 Special/AP collaboratives. Funding will also support project management and co-ordination to ensure there is sufficient capacity to successfully deliver the project. We will use ‘Relational Schools’ to help evidence the impact of training. Monitoring will be undertaken by the School to School Support partnership and Head’s Associations.
Empirical research finds that successful school leadership creates conditions that support effective teaching and learning and builds capacity for professional learning and change (Hallinger & Heck 2010). Our aim is to strengthen leadership and therefore quality of teaching through joint practice development. We will follow existing models of good practice where there has been evidence of the effectiveness of this approach such as Challenge Partners, and school-led models like those in Essex, Peterborough and Hounslow. Evidence of the effectiveness of peer review models can be seen through research from the London Challenge, CfBT and Sutton Trust.
3. Short-term Outcomes (max 1,500 characters) What practices, skills, behaviours, knowledge, and of whom, do you intend to change in the short term as a result of the activities described in the output section?
The Peer review process will support and strengthen leadership skills in strategic planning, self-evaluation, monitoring, review, action planning and effective use of evidence based interventions
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
based on examples from EEF and others. The practice of Peer review and working in Collaborative s strengthens shared moral purpose and trust; the key elements of a school led improvement system. It will build joint practice development between leaders and facilitate this between practitioners.
As part of the Peer review process we will introduce a ‘before and after’ questionnaire for participating head teachers to analyse the impact on their own leadership behaviours. The survey questions will link to the Ofsted Framework and Head Teacher Standards and the specific improvement areas we anticipate the project most impacting on as detailed in the first paragraph of this section. We expect to see at least 80% of the surveys evidencing that the peer to peer review process has had a positive impact on the head teachers.
In the term following the initial peer to peer review cohort taking place we will also review the progress that the schools are making against the areas identified in their collaboratively developed action plans and any initial impacts being seen.
Finally, we would expect where schools are inspected by Ofsted during this project that there is some evidence of improved leadership within the school’s judgement.
4. Long-term Outcomes (max 1,500 characters) What longer term outcomes are you intending to achieve in relation to the baseline measures in your rationale, and when will they be realised? What evidence will you gather to show that the outcomes have been achieved?
By strengthening the quality of leadership across schools we will impact on pupils' outcomes and show improved standards across Suffolk in all phases. We expect to see some impact from the first 2 cohorts in the 2018 output measures and 2019 for subsequent cohorts.
By the end of the project we will see an impact on pupil outcomes at KS2 & KS4 in the project schools. This will focus on Attainment 8, Progress 8, and end of key stage 2 outcomes with a focus on disadvantaged and SEND pupils.
We also hope to see at least 90% of the collaboratives being sustained and that the practice starts to impact on the effectiveness of wider school leadership and governance.
By 2020 we expect Suffolk schools to be performing at least at National Average or better, especially for disadvantaged and SEND pupils. By strengthening the quality and leadership teaching/ learning across the eligible schools we expect to see a higher % of good/outstanding Ofsted judgements within Suffolk, especially relating to the Leadership and Outcomes judgements. We expect to be at least National Average % for Good and Outstanding schools and National Average for the % of pupils taught in Good and Outstanding schools by September 2019 and Eastern region average by 2020.
The evidence will be gathered from Ofsted judgements, Watchsted website, Performance tables and local intelligence.
Our ultimate aim is that we hope to significantly reduce the number of schools that are on our list in this application.
Our ultimate aim is that we hope to significantly reduce the number of schools that are on our list in this application.
5. Monitoring (max 1,500 characters) How will you monitor the impact of the activity? What data and/or evidence will you collect to show that you are making progress towards the short and long-term outcomes? What sources of evidence will you use to show that changes have been made?
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
In the initial phase, the facilitators will hold the Collaborative to account for implementing the interventions and initiatives from their action plans and measuring their impact. Each teaching school will then report to School to School Support Partnership on their Collaborative s impact. The School to School Support Partnership will then decide if any additional support or actions are needed to strengthen progress towards improved outcomes.
We will ensure that we are monitoring the impact of the peer to peer review process with head teachers through before and after surveys to ensure that it is having a positive impact. The surveys may also identify any improvements we need to make to the delivery of the project for subsequent cohorts.
We would also wish to work closely with the RSC and take note of their evidence from visits and comments from Ofsted reports or HMI visits.
To ensure that we have high quality provision we will work with other local headteacher associations with experience of peer to peer review processes to provide reciprocal arrangements (or paid external consultants) for the monitoring of the effectiveness of our systems and processes. This will be via visits and random sampling of action plans and face to face interviews with participating headteachers.
Our longer-term aims will be measured in improved outputs, measured by achievement and progress data in the school performance tables and by the improved Ofsted outcomes over time.
6. Risks/Barriers to success (max 1,500 characters) What are the biggest risks to success and how will these be mitigated?
Description of Risk: Delay to project startImpact: That the project delivers a lower level of KPI’s than originally proposed Severity: MediumMitigation: Notification of success of the bid will come in the school holidays. We have good existing relationships and communication links with all schools and will be able to confirm the schools involved in the first cohort quickly. Schools have been notified already that this bid is being submitted. We have also budgeted for sufficient project management capacity and have a communications plan to ensure that we get the project started quickly.Description of Risk: Uptake is lowImpact: That the project is unable to deliver KPI’s to the level originally proposedSeverity: LowLinks to other projects and/or business areas Mitigation: We have the existing relationships and communication routes with all Suffolk schools to ensure we can recruit to the proposed levels. We have also budgeted sufficient project management capacity to ensure we can liaise with schools and recruit to the timescale. Description of Risk: Higher than expected attrition ratesImpact: That the project is unable to deliver KPI’s to the level originally proposedSeverity: LowLinks to other projects and/or business areas Mitigation: We anticipate very low levels of attrition and would mitigate this through our relationships with the schools. As a new project, the feedback of participants will be sought to ensure that it is meeting their needs.
7. Sustainability (max 1,500 characters) In what ways do the activities in this application ensure that the desired improvements will be sustained following completion of the programme?
Sustainability is at the heart of this project because its scale and locally led nature mean that we will significantly increase the skills, expertise and capacity of school leadership in the county and therefore be able to embed this practice in such a way that it does not fail just because a handful of people leave the profession or move away. It is also a significantly cheaper approach than other
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
similar options on the market meaning that in the long term it is realistic to expect each collaborative to continue in the long term from their own school budgets once the model is proven locally and schools can see its impact.
After the completion of our initial phases we will have trained over 185 Headteachers in the process of Peer to Peer review, collaborative action planning and joint practice development. We will have built a much-improved leadership capacity and expertise, which we feel can be used for facilitation and challenge in the wider Suffolk context. It will also will remove the need for high cost facilitation and training for future cohorts. The Teaching Schools’ Alliances are fully engaged with this project and work together with the headteachers’ organisations as part of the School to School Support Partnership who will continue to provide long term support for this project. This provides a co-ordinated approach to school improvement in a school led system using existing strengths and expertise.
8. Scalability (max 1,500 characters) If the proposed programme outlined in this application were to be funded, what do you think are possible ways that the proposed intervention could be taken to scale?
This project is already an ambitious, large-scale project and having established the Peer to Peer review model we can extend this to all Suffolk schools over time using the internal capacity we have developed from the first phases. With the support of the Teaching Schools’ Alliances and headteacher organisations, (who can provide some coordination and management support), the school to School Support Partnership can identify further school improvement initiatives and bid for funding under the existing arrangements.
We want this project to be of a scale and nature to bring about sustainable improvement across all Suffolk schools but it could also form the basis of a regional approach to bring about wider joint practice development. We also feel that this project is unique in the scale of primary involvement which could be a model for other areas to follow.
9. Capacity and capability (max 1,500 characters) Please state how you and your providers (identified earlier in this application) are suited to delivering this programme of work. We are particularly looking for evidence of previous successful delivery of activities of a similar scale and theme.
We have 11 well-established successful Teaching School Alliances and other Collaborative groups as well as many new 3 TSAs working in Suffolk. Collectively, these groups have wide experience of delivering leadership development and supporting specific schools or groups of schools. All this expertise now comes together in the Suffolk School to School Support Partnership, supported by the headteacher organisations’ professional officers. This combination of collective expertise and moral purpose provides a dynamic school-led improvement model which is clearly focussed on local needs. We will be able to fully utilise the expertise of NLEs, LLEs and SLEs to support the Collaboratives and help with facilitation. We also will use the expertise and knowledge of other Headteacher groups in surrounding counties e.g. Peterborough, Essex and Cambridgeshire secondary schools.
As this model is designed to strengthen leadership, we will be adding to our capacity as we move through project.
Other examples of local expertise and similar themes come from:
The Suffolk ‘Strengthening Leadership through Peer Review project’ in conjunction with HMI for a group of schools in the Waveney District.
Using the expertise of Samuel Ward Academy Trust as a research school to support the Schools to School Support Partnership.
The Ashley School Academy Trust, as a National Support School for helping support mainstream schools with developing their AP/SEND provision, along with two Outstanding Special Schools – The Priory and Thomas Wolsey.
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
Summary information
1. Which key stage(s) are you targeting:
You can select multiple entries
N.b. Early Years and KS5 / 16-18 activities are not supported by this Fund unless they are in schools deemed as Primary, Secondary, or All-through
☐ Early Years Foundation Stage☐ KS1 ☒ KS2 ☐ KS3 ☒ KS4 ☐ KS5
2. Which theme(s) best describe your application:
You can select multiple entries
☐ Developing independent thinking☒ Literacy☒ Numeracy☒ Science☐ Parental engagement☐ Language development☐ Pupil engagement and behaviour☐ Feedback and monitoring pupil progress☐ School organisation☒ Staff development☐ Financial health and efficiency☒ Special schools☐ Teacher workload☒ Other (if not listed, please write theme below)Strengthening Leadership
3. How many pupils do you expect to directly benefit from this application? 4,001+☐
Declaration of Interests
DfE requires that the applicant and the provider(s) offering services funded by this application declare any conflicts of interest they have with organisations party to this application.
The Department for Education defines a conflict of interest as ‘a situation in which someone in a position of trust either within the Department, or from a future or existing contractor, has competing professional or personal interests that may have the potential to distort competition. Such competing interests can make it difficult to fulfil his or her duties impartially.’
Application for Strategic School Improvement Fund
In deciding which interests to disclose, those affected by this declaration should ask whether, in the opinion of a fair-minded and informed observer, the interest would suggest a real possibility of bias.
If you declare an interest, we will take a decision on how these will be managed.
Could the personal interests of any party to this application or those of family members or friends be deemed to benefit from this application should it be funded?
N If you have declared a conflict, please provide details
If you have declared a conflict, please explain how this will be managed
What other interests do you wish to disclose?
If you have declared any conflicts, please provide details:
If you have declared any conflicts, please explain how these will be managed:
Grant Funding Agreement On applying for this fund, you are agreeing to be held to the terms and conditions of the DfE’s Grant Funding Agreement (click here to view).
Are you content with your application?
DfE will not accept applications sent through by email. All applications must be made through the online portal linked to from the gov.uk page.
Recommended