Lecture Outline Schemas Part 2 Schemas: Types & Models Feedback on Exam 1

Lecture OutlineSchemas Part 2

Schemas: Types & Models

Feedback on Exam 1

Schema TypesPerson Schemas:

Who are you?

Beliefs about personality types: Traits that co-occur in others

Extroverts are outgoing and friendly

Introverts are quite and shy

Behaviors that characterize person-types

Extroverts go to big partiesIntroverts go to small

gatherings

Function: Help people draw inferences about others

Schema TypesSelf Schemas: Who am I?

Everything one knows and can imagine about oneselfTraits characteristic of oneself Memory of one’s pastExpectations for one’s future

self

Function: Help organize, guide, and interpret incoming information

Self-Schemas

Schematic: clear self-view on a dimension important and central to

one’s self-concept

Aschematic: unclear self-view on a dimensionnot important and not

central to one’s self-concept

Self-Schema Study Markus, 1977

Purpose: Test whether self-schemas help people process information

Prediction: People will process information more quickly when they are schematic than aschematic on a dimension

Self-Schema Study Markus, 1977

1. Assessed if participants were schematic or aschematic on (in)dependence

Schematics: extreme (in)dependence

Aschematics: moderate (in)dependence

2. Participants indicated as quickly as possible whether a series of traits described them

3. Expectations about typical behavior

Self-Schema StudyMarkus, 1977

1. Schematic-Independents responded faster to independent than dependent traits

2. Schematic-Dependents responded faster to dependent than independent traits

3. Aschematics responded similarly to independent and dependent traits

Conclusion: self-schemas enable one to process self-relevant information more quickly

Schema TypesRole Schemas:

What are they like?

Norms and expectations about particular roles in society Waitresses take food orders Doctors cure the ill

Function: Help people draw inferences

Simplify social information

Role Schemas

Achieved roles: acquired through effort and training

pro-basketball playercollege student

Ascribed roles: acquired through birth

genderethnicity

Schema TypesEvent Schemas:

What happens here?

Expected sequence of eventsgoing to classgoing to the gym

Function: Help people anticipate what happens

next

Help people achieve next step in sequence via planning and goal setting

Models of Person & Role Schemas

1. Associative Network Models

Schemas organized as web of features:Nodes = featuresLinks = association between features

Associative Network Models

Protests unfair

treatment

Won’t pay rent until house painted

Wants nice house

Hits

Punches

Aggressive

Curses

Lawyer Professor

Well dressed Competitive Intelligent

Node

Link

Activation of Nodes

Context affects a node’s level of activation

Activation of Nodes

Adjacent nodes activate each other

(Called Spreading Activation)

Activation of Nodes

Nodes can be simultaneously activated by multiple other nodes

Activation of Nodes

More activation = node has more effect on processing

(e.g., memory, inferences)

Activation of Nodes

Activation decays gradually

Associative Network Models

Limitation:

Activation continues indefinitely

Here’s how……….

Associative Network Models

Protests unfair

treatment

Won’t pay rent until house painted

Wants nice house

Hits

Punches

AggressiveCurses

Lawyer Professor

Well dressed Competitive Intelligent

Associative Network Models

BUT……

Aggressive is not associated with

Professors

Thus, model breaks down

Models of Person & Role Schemas

2. Parallel Constraint Satisfaction Models

Schemas organized as web of features:Nodes = featuresLinks = association between features

Parallel Constraint Satisfaction Models

Same as Associative Network Models except:

Excitatory (Positive) AND Inhibitory (Negative) links

Parallel Constraint Satisfaction Models

Excitatory (Positive) Links: Nodes activate each other

Aggressive activates Lawyer

Inhibitory (Negative) Links: Nodes deactivate each other

Professor deactivates aggressive

Parallel Constraint Satisfaction Models

Excitatory (Positive) Links:

Nodes both activated or deactivated

When Aggressive activated, Lawyer activated

When Aggressive deactivated, Lawyer deactivated

Parallel Constraint Satisfaction Models

Inhibitory (Negative) Links:

One node activated, one deactivated

When Professor activated, Aggressive deactivated

When Professor deactivated, Aggressive activated

Models of Person & Role Schemas

3. Continuum Model of Impression Formation

Explains how people form impressions of others

Continuum Model: Main Ideas

Schemas conserve mental resources (attention)

Impression formation is a continuum of processes

Each process requires more mental effort (attention) than the one before it

Each process reflects less influence of schema than one before it

Point 1: Initial Categorization

Categorize target

Warrant further processing?

Stop processing and base impression on schema OR move to next point

Point 2: Confirmatory Categorization

Match target to category If match good:

stop processinguse schema to form impression

If match poor: allocate more attention to personmove to next point

Point 3: Recategorization (subtyping)

Match target to subtype

If match good:stop processinguse subtype to form impression

If match poor: allocate more attention to personmove to next point

Point 4: Piecemeal Integration

(individuation)

Attend very closely to person

Base impression on person’s personal characteristics

Schema has no effect on impression

People are cognitive misers:

First try to base impression on a schema (this conserves resources)

Only base impressions on another’s personal attributes (this expends resources) when schemas do not work

Assumptions of Continuum Model

Moderator: a factor that changes the strength of a relationship

Schemas influence impressions

Attention moderates this relationship schemas influence impressions more strongly when attention is low than high

Continuum Model: Moderators

Schema Impression

Attention

Schema has: stronger effect on impression when attention low

weaker effect on impression when attention high

Ways to vary attention: outcome dependence accountability accuracy motivation Circadian cycles of arousal

Terms:Perceiver: person forming an

impression

Target: person about whom impression is formed

Attention as Moderator

Morning Types: Reach functional peak early in day

Evening Types:Reach function peak late in day

Circadian Cycles of Arousal

PredictionsMorning Types

high attention early in day

low attention late in day

Evening Types: low attention early in day

high attention late in day

Circadian Cycles Study (Bodenhausen, 1990)

Stereotyping low

Stereotyping high

Stereotyping high

Stereotyping low

Read about misconduct on campus

Read mixed evidenceRated suspect’s guilt

Manipulations:Suspect: Hispanic or White

Time of ratings: early or late in day

Circadian Cycles Study (Bodenhausen, 1990)

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

Morning Type Evening Type

Gu

ilt Hispanic

White

Who should stereotype more late in the day?

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

Morning Type Evening Type

Gu

ilt Hispanic

White

Who should stereotype more early in the day?