View
1.839
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
by Maj Gen Kamiya, Command, Joint Warfighting Center, USJFCOM presentation on Leading Transformation with Modeling & Simulation, helping to make Irregular Warfare a core competency, enhancing joint command and control, improving global force management, accelerating efforts toward a "whole government" approach (i.e. interagency participation), building and improving partnership capacity and improving training and education. Industry and academia can help with these processes. Triads: The 1960s-1980s brought us "Strategic Art": Missiles, Bombers, Submarines; the 1980s-1990s brought us "Operational Art": Land, Air and Sea. 2001-until? brings us "Tactical Art": Leader, Individual, Small Units. For video M&S demonstration, visit: http://bit.ly/Kamiya 19 June 2009 presentation to the Hampton Roads Partnership's Board of Directors
Citation preview
UNCLASSIFIED 1
United States Joint Forces CommandModeling & Simulation
United States Joint Forces CommandUnited States Joint Forces CommandModeling & SimulationModeling & Simulation
Major General Jason K. KamiyaCommander, Joint Warfighting CenterU.S. Joint Forces Command19 June 2009
UNCLASSIFIED 2
Presentation Outline
USJFCOM PrioritiesUSJFCOM Modeling and Simulation ResponsibilitiesUSJFCOM Partnerships in Modeling and SimulationModeling and Simulation and the Joint Training EnvironmentChallengesDemonstrationHampton Roads and USJFCOM – M&S partnerships
UNCLASSIFIED 3
USJFCOM PrioritiesMaking Irregular Warfare a Core Competency
USJFCOM Joint Irregular Warfare CenterEstablish a program for small unit excellence
Enhancing Joint Command and ControlJoint Command and Control Vision
Approach C2 holistically, leader-centric and net-enabledFacilitate initiative and decision-making at the lowest level Operate in a C2 degraded environment
Improving as a Joint Force ProviderBetter Global Force Management database & technology toolsExpand existing high-demand and grow new capabilities
Accelerating Efforts Toward a Whole of Government ApproachIncrease Interagency participation in exercises and trainingSupport DoD and Interagency expeditionary capability
Building and Improving Partnership CapacityImproving Training and Education
Joint Professional Military EducationEmphasis on human, cultural, language, and cognitive skills
UNCLASSIFIED 4
Manage the integrated joint training architectures using the DoDArchitecture framework and in coordination with the combatant commanders; develop and define standards for live, virtual and constructive training capabilities, including technical development, capabilities prioritization, implementation, configuration control, and sustainment; and enforce standards through a certification process. (DoD Directive 1322.18, Military Training, 3 September 2004)
Leading the development and operation of joint training systems and architectures that directly support the combatant commanders, Services, and defense agencies. (Unified Command Plan 2008)
USJFCOM Modeling and Simulation Responsibilities
UNCLASSIFIED 5
USJFCOM Partnerships in Modeling and Simulation
Australia
Canada
Combatant Commands
Industry
Interagency
Modeling & Simulation Coordination Office
NATO
Partnership for Peace
Services
Sweden
Switzerland
Team Orlando
United Kingdom
Virginia Modeling, Analysis, & Simulation Center
UNCLASSIFIED 6
Hampton Roads M&S and USJFCOMODU Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA)Advance modeling and simulation research and development in support of joint training, experimentation, and simulation-based analysis. Effective Date: April 2008.
Virginia Modeling, Analysis, & Simulation Center Battle Lab ContractTo provide USJFCOM with M&S and related system support with integrated Battle Lab. Effective Date: February 2008. ODU Student/Faculty/Engineering/Senior Fellows ContractTo provide USJFCOM with student, faculty, engineering, and technical expertise, and accessibility to Senior Fellows for support in the areas of warfighter requirements definition; program definition, formulation, execution objectives, and assessment; concept development; and event concept development. Effective Date: September 2008.
UNCLASSIFIED 7
The Joint Training “Environment”
UNCLASSIFIED 8
Live-Virtual-Constructive ToolsReal Forces
Computer RepresentationOf Live Forces
= Joint Training Environment that is available to small tactical units
through higher echelons of command
Increasingly Global Joint Training
Network+
Training Audience Cannot Tell The Difference Between What is Live and What is Not!
Real Service membersin Simulators
UNCLASSIFIED 9
An Increasingly Global Joint Training Network
Joint Warfare Center (JWC)
*Stavanger, Norway
Europe JTEN HubGrafenwÖhr, Germany
JWFCSuffolk, VA
JFTC Poland
Okinawa Japan
JAC MolesworthUnited Kingdom
Canada CommandOttawa, Canada
Defence Training Experimentation Network (DTEN) Canberra, Australia
Pacific JTEN HubCamp Smith, HI
Korean Battle Simulation Center (KBSC) ,Korea WPC
EUCOM
Exercise TALISMAN SABER connectivity: 51,000 mi. That’s more than 17 trips by car between Norfolk and Seattle (3000+ mi.)
UNCLASSIFIED 10
Four Areas Where Modeling and Simulations Have The Greatest Need in Joint Training
Missile DefenseIrregular WarfareImmersive TrainingSimulation of “non-kinetic” – especially population related events
• Population attitudes• Social networks
UNCLASSIFIED 11
The New Triad
Strategic Art(1960’s-1980’s)
SubmarinesBombers
Missiles
Tactical Art(2001 - ?)
Small Units
Leader
Individual
Air
Operational Art(1980’s-1990’s)
Sea
Land
UNCLASSIFIED 12
Characteristics that can make a difference:• Measurement and assessment of human performance is the
centerpiece, not simply an ancillary benefit to help rationalize an investment. Provides the critical standard upon which “black boxes” will be evaluated.
• Immersive, decision-making stimuli infinitely repeatable though nothing exactly repeated that was done before.
• Modular to introduce increasing variables of complexity within changeable environments (to include conventional, nuclear, and irregular war).
• Stresses tactical and ethical decision making leading to overallindividual and small unit self-confidence. Open ended objectives…not merely electronic lane training. Challenges Cold War era Task-Condition-Standard construct.
Making Irregular Warfare A Core CompetencyHow Industry and Academia Can Help
UNCLASSIFIED 13
Characteristics that can make a difference (cont.):• Replicates joint enablers such as ISR and joint fires (air and
ground) when used at home station, and can integrate these live enablers in real-time for mission planning/rehearsal in combat.
• Ensures distributed integration of joint capabilities -- designed with standard architectures to ensure interoperability with other systems. (A virtual F-22 at Langley AFB, Virginia “flying” in support of a Marine infantry squad negotiating the Infantry Immersive Trainer at Camp Pendleton, California).
• Easily transitioned to the field. Same capability used at home station and in combat. Small, lightweight, transportable.
• Evidence-based. Results measurable and can be correlated to return on investment. Diagnostic baseline...objective measurement / assessment.
Making Irregular Warfare A Core CompetencyHow Industry and Academia Can Help
UNCLASSIFIED 14
Demonstration
UNCLASSIFIED 15
Questions / Discussion
Recommended