View
5
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 1
Land Rich Duty1
Peter Allen and Katrina Parkyn, Allens Arthur Robinson
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
Traditionally, every Australian jurisdiction has imposed stamp duty on transfers of real
property and marketable securities. Although duty on transfers of quoted marketable
securities has been abolished in all states, and, in some states, also on transfers of
unquoted marketable securities2, all states continue to impose duty on real property
transfers.
The significant difference between the rates of duty applying to transfers of real property
compared with transfers of marketable securities, and the fact that the value of shares
reflects the net rather than gross value of underlying assets, led to some purchasers
acquiring the shares in a land owning company, rather than a direct acquisition of the
underlying land. The so called 'land rich' provisions were introduced as an anti-avoidance
measure to combat such arrangements although, as discussed below, the focus has in
more recent times shifted from these anti-avoidance origins.
1.2 Overview
In broad terms, the land rich provisions which exist in every Australian jurisdiction apply to
relevant acquisitions of shares or units in what are termed 'land rich' entities.
The types of issues that are relevant to determining whether a transaction is caught by the
provisions commonly include:
(a) understanding what types of entities are potentially caught by the provisions;
(b) determining whether a particular entity is 'land rich';
(c) analysing the trigger for duty in each jurisdiction and the way that duty is assessed
on particular transactions; and
(d) consideration of whether a particular transaction is exempt from duty (in some
cases, it can be equally important to consider whether any previous transactions
were exempt from duty).
Each of these issues raises a myriad of potentially complex sub-issues, which can vary
markedly between the various jurisdictions.
1 This paper is based upon Australian stamp duty laws as at 29 July 2004 and is only intended to provide generalinformation on the topics discussed. It is not intended that this paper provide advice and it should not be relied upon assuch. Advice relating to any specific facts and circumstances should be sought prior to acting.
2 Victoria, Tasmania and Western Australia.
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 2
2. Legislative Framework
The land rich provisions are located in the following legislation:
(a) NSW-Chapter 3, Part 2 of the Duties Act 1997 (sections 106 to 124);
(b) VIC-Chapter 3, Part 2 of the Duties Act 2000 (sections 70 to 89S);
(c) Qld-Chapter 3 of the Duties Act 2001 (sections 157 to 204);
(d) WA-Part IIIBA, Divisions 2,3, 3a and 3b of the Stamp Act 1921 (sections 76 to
76ATL);
(e) SA-Division 5, Part 4 of the Stamp Act 1923 (sections 91 to 102);
(f) Tas-Chapter 3, Part 2 of the Duties Act 2001 (sections 59 to 77);
(g) ACT-Chapter 3, part 3.2 of the Duties Act 1999 (sections 78 to 95); and
(h) NT-Division 8A of the Taxation (Administration) Act 1978 (sections 56C to 56T).
3. Entities to which the provisions apply
3.1 Introduction
In each state and territory, other than Western Australia (WA) and Queensland (Qld), the
land rich provisions apply to companies and trusts. WA and Qld each have separate
regimes for companies and trusts.
3.2 Application to Private Companies
The land rich provisions in every jurisdiction apply to what are generally referred to as
'private companies'.
Basically, a private company is a company that is not limited by shares or whose shares
are not quoted on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) or any exchange of the World
Federation of Exchanges.
In some States, the provisions are not as technically accurate as they could be. However,
in practice listed entities are not private companies.
3.3 Application to Listed Companies
Recent changes to the WA Act have extended the application of the WA land rich
provisions to listed companies where at least a 90% interest is obtained. At this stage, the
application of the land rich provisions to listed companies per se is unique to WA although
arguably land rich duty can also be imposed in SA on an acquisition which leads to an
entity ceasing to be listed after the acquisition has occurred.
3.4 Application to Unit Trusts
There is even greater disparity between the jurisdictions in their application of the land rich
provisions to unit trusts.
(a) NSW
The two types of trusts potentially subject to the NSW provisions are:
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 3
(i) private unit trust schemes; and
(ii) wholesale unit trust schemes.
Public unit trust schemes are not subject to the land rich provisions.
A wholesale unit trust scheme is a unit trust scheme3 in which not less than 80%
of the units are held by 'qualifying investors', provided that each qualifying investor
holds less than 50% of the units in the unit trust scheme or, if a qualifying investor
holds units in more than one capacity, the qualifying investor holds less than 50%
of the units in each capacity.
It is worth noting that as the definition of wholesale unit trust scheme is currently
drafted, there are circumstances in which a trust could potentially qualify as both a
wholesale unit trust and a public unit trust. This is a concern since public unit trustschemes are not subject to the land rich provisions at all. It is suggested that the
definition of wholesale unit trust should be amended to make it clear that a
wholesale unit trust is a unit trust that is not a public unit trust. Hopefully, this is
how NSW administers the provision in any event although legislative or
administrative clarification of the point would be useful.
Upon approval by the Commissioner, a unit trust may be regarded as a wholesale
unit trust if, in the Commissioner's opinion, it will satisfy the above requirements
within 12 months (or longer if the Commissioner allows), provided that the only
units issued in that 12 months (or the longer period) from the time theCommissioner gives the relevant approval are issued for the purpose of the unit
trust becoming a wholesale unit trust.
The NSW definition of 'qualifying investor' is an interesting one. To be a qualifying
investor an investor must fit into one or more of the following categories:
(A) trustee of a complying superannuation fund which has not less than 300members;
(B) trustee of a complying approved deposit fund which has not less than 300members;
(C) trustee of a pooled superannuation trust;
(D) trustee of a public unit trust;
(E) life company if its holding of units in the unit trust is an investment of astatutory fund maintained by it under the Life Insurance Act 1995 (Cth);
(F) custodian for a trustee or life company referred to above, in its capacity assuch a custodian; or
(G) trustee of another wholesale unit trust scheme.
In our experience, these classes of qualifying investor do not necessarily reflect thefunds management industry view of what constitutes a wholesale investor.
Another concern is that, based on the categories listed, any trust in which foreign
investors hold 20% of the interests is unlikely to qualify as a wholesale unit trust.
3 Defined in sch 2 of the Duties Act 1997 (NSW).
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 4
Any foreign investors are unlikely to fit within a class of qualifying investor.Hopefully, this is an oversight which will be corrected.
A private unit trust is any unit trust that is not a public unit trust scheme or a
wholesale unit trust scheme.
As noted earlier, public unit trust schemes are not subject to the land rich
provisions. A public unit trust scheme is any one of the following:
(i) a listed trust, being a unit trust scheme any of the units in which are listed forquotation on the ASX or any exchange of the World Federation of Exchanges;
(ii) a widely held trust, being a unit trust scheme which has not less than 300unitholders none of whom, individually or together with any associated person, isbeneficially entitled to more than 20% of the units in the trust;
(iii) an imminent public trust (ie one which the Commissioner is satisfied will satisfy (i)or (ii) within 12 months (or such longer period as the Commissioner may determine)and in which the only units issued during the 12 months (or the longer period) arefor the purpose of the unit trust becoming a public unit trust).
(b) Vic
On 13 May 20044, Vic introduced changes which are broadly consistent with the
changes which took effect in NSW in November 2003.
Vic has adopted the NSW concept of distinguishing between private, wholesale
and public unit trusts. There are however, some notable differences in the relevant
definition of each type of trust.
(i) Public Unit Trusts
Like NSW, public unit trusts are outside the land rich provisions.
There are 4 categories of public unit trust in Vic:
(A) Listed Trust This is a unit trust in which all of the units are listed
for quotation on the ASX or another recognised exchange and are
traded on that exchange. Previously it was enough for some but
not all of the units to be listed for quotation (which is still the
position in NSW) and there was no requirement that the units be
traded. There is no guidance as to the level or frequency of trading
required in order for units to be regarded as being 'traded' for thepurposes of the section.
(B) Widely Held Trust Basically, this only applies to registered
managed investment schemes under the Corporations Act 2001
(Cth) which have at least 300 beneficial unitholders, none of whom
4 State Taxation Acts (Tax Reform) Act 2004
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 5
either individually or with their associates are beneficially entitled tomore than 20% of the units in the scheme. 5
(C) Registered Imminent Public Unit Trust Scheme This basically
allows a trust to register for public unit trust treatment during its
start up phase if the Commissioner is satisfied that the trust will
become listed or widely held within 12 months after the later of the
day on which the first units in the trust were issued or the date of
the prospectus or product disclosure statement for the offer of units
to the public. Units issued before the trust becomes listed or
widely held must be issued only for the purpose of the trust
becoming listed or widely held.
(D) Registered Declared Public Unit Trust Scheme This allows the
Commissioner to declare a trust to be a public unit trust if he is
satisfied that it should be so registered. There is no guidance in
the legislation as to the circumstances in which the Commissioner
would be so satisfied although the application form available from
the Vic State Revenue Office website indicates some of the
matters the Commissioner would consider including:
(1) whether the scheme was established for a particular
investor or group of investors;
(2) the degree of ownership and control a particular investor or
group of investors has over the scheme;
(3) whether the purpose and nature of the scheme is
effectively public; and
(4) whether there are any factors preventing the scheme from
being registered as an imminent public unit trust.
A public unit trust does not include a unit trust that is, or was at any time, a
wholesale unit trust (including an imminent wholesale unit trust) or was
eligible for registration as such. In other words, a trust cannot transition
from wholesale to public unit trust status. Once a trust is a wholesale unit
trust (as defined), it will never be public and therefore never be outside the
land rich provisions (unless, of course, it ceases to be land rich). This is
likely to cause significant problems in practice for any wholesale unit trusts
which subsequently seek to become listed. Under the current provisions,
such trusts will continue to be subject to the Vic land rich provisions. The
policy rationale for this approach is unclear, particularly given that there is
no such restriction upon a private unit trust becoming public.
5 Section 89A of the Duties Act 2000 (VIC) provides a temporary concession from this 20% threshold for widely held trustswhich have 're-purchase facilities' which results in a temporary breach of the 20% threshold. If the requirements of thesection are met the threshold is temporarily increased to 25%.
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 6
(ii) Wholesale Unit Trusts
The Vic wholesale unit trust concept is similar to that in NSW, except that:
(A) the scheme must register with the Commissioner to be regarded as
a wholesale unit trust (there is no self assessment of such status);
(B) the scheme must not be established for a particular investor.
(C) the third requirement is that either:
(1) the trustee must hold directly or indirectly an interest in not
less than 3 parcels of land. At least 2 of those interests
must have an unencumbered value of $10 million or more.
It is unclear what constitutes a 'parcel' of land, although the
Commissioner may treat 2 or more parcels as a single
parcel if he is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so having
regard to the ownership of the parcels, their proximity and
use; or
(2) at least 6 unitholders in the trust, who are not associated,
have a subscription under the scheme of not less than $3million.
Like NSW, wholesale unit trusts must satisfy a requirement that not less
than 80% of the units in the scheme are held by qualified investors. No
qualified investor (alone or with their associates) can hold 50% or more of
the units in the scheme.
The Commissioner can refuse registration as a wholesale unit trust if he
believes it is being sought for the purposes of, or as part of a scheme or
arrangement with a collateral purpose of, avoiding or reducing land rich
duty. Presumably though what the Commissioner is concerned about (and
would focus on) is any manipulation of the requirements for wholesale unit
trust status.
The definition of 'qualified investor' for the purposes of the Vic provisions is
substantially the same as in NSW, except that the Commissioner also has
a discretion to approve an investor as a qualified investor if he is satisfiedthat it is investing in a capacity that corresponds to a capacity referred to
above under the law of an external territory or country outside Australia.
There is scope for a trust to be registered as an imminent wholesale unit
trust. To be registered as such, the Commissioner must be satisfied that
the trust will meet the criteria for wholesale unit trust status within 12
months after the day on which the first units were issued to a qualified
investor and the units issued before the trust meets the criteria for
registration as a wholesale unit trust have been or will be issued only for
the purpose of meeting those criteria. This process offers an important
concession for wholesale unit trusts during their start up phase.
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 7
If an imminent public or imminent wholesale unit trust fails to meet thecriteria for registration as listed, widely held or wholesale status, as the
case may be, within the 12 month period, the trust is treated as a private
unit trust for the whole of that period and the acquisition of any 'significant
interest' during that time 'becomes a relevant acquisition' which is liable to
duty. Penalties and interest accrue if the duty is not paid within 3 months
from the date the liability to duty arose (ie the date of the relevant
acquisition). It is not altogether clear whether the relevant acquisition (and
hence the liability to duty) is taken to have occurred on the day on which
the significant acquisition occurred (ie the actual date of the acquisition) or
alternatively on the date that the acquisition 'becomes a relevant
acquisition'. The conservative view is that it is the former, although the
matter is not entirely free from doubt.
Registration as a declared public unit trust, imminent public unit trust,
wholesale unit trust or imminent wholesale unit trust is effective for:
(A) 3 years in the case of a declared public unit trust or wholesale unit
trust;
(B) 12 months in the case of an imminent public unit trust or imminent
wholesale unit trust.
Registration can be renewed on application.
(c) Tas and the ACT
In Tas and the ACT a private unit trust scheme is a unit trust scheme that is not a
public unit trust scheme. 6 Public unit trust schemes are not subject to the land rich
provisions.
Therefore, the focus is on whether a particular trust is a public unit trust.
Some points to note about the public unit trust test (set out in the previous
footnote) are:
• paragraph (a) refers to a trust in which any of the units are listed for
quotation. This is in contrast to the new Vic provisions;
6 Public unit trust scheme means a unit trust scheme:
(a) any of the units of which are listed for quotation on the ASX or on a recognised stock exchange; or
(b) that is a managed investment scheme within the meaning of chapter 5C of the Corporations Act applies and inrespect of which (1) some or all of the units have been offered to the public and (2) no fewer than 50 persons holdunits in it; or
(c) that, in the opinion of the Commissioner, will satisfy paragraph (a) or (b) within 12 months after the Commissionergives written notice of that opinion to a person who has requested the Commissioner to express that opinion inrelation to the unit trust scheme.
The definition of public unit trust also includes certain unit trusts covered by the Corporations Act provisions prior to theintroduction of the managed investment scheme regime. Such trusts must however meet similar 'public offer' and spread ofownership tests as managed investment schemes.
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 8
• paragraph (b) refers to units having been offered (as opposed to issued) to
the public. One may question whether there are any circumstances in
which units may be offered although ultimately not issued to the public.
There can also be issues in determining how many persons to whom units
must be offered, in order to constitute an offer to the 'public'. This issuewas considered by the High Court in Corporate Affairs Commission (SA) v
Australian Central Credit Union (1985) 157 CLR 201. That case concerned
the issue of whether an offer of units by a credit union to its 23,0000
members was an 'offer to the public' under the prescribed interest
provisions of the then Companies (SA) Code. On the relevant facts, the
High Court ruled that the offer made by the credit union was not an 'offer to
the public'.
The case demonstrates that determining what constitutes an 'offer to the
public' is not purely a question of how many persons to whom the offer is
made. Other factors, such as the nature of an subsisting relationshipbetween the offeror and the members of the group, the nature and content
of the offer and the significance of any particular characteristic which
identifies the group, are also relevant.
(d) SA
The South Australian land rich provisions apply to private unit trust schemes.
A private unit trust scheme is a unit trust scheme in which:
(i) less than 50 persons holds units; or
(ii) 50 or more persons hold units if 20 or fewer persons hold 75% or more in
number or value of the units on issue,
but does not include a unit trust scheme that is an approved deposit fund or pooled
superannuation trust within the meaning of the Superannuation Industry
Supervision Act 1993 (Cth).
It is important to note that unlike the other jurisdictions, the quotation of units in a
trust does not, of itself, preclude the land rich provisions from applying to a unit
trust scheme. However, item 24D of the second schedule to the Stamp Act 1923
(SA) provides an exemption from all stamp duties in respect of a conveyance of a
quoted financial product which should extend to land rich duty. An interest in a
managed investment scheme registered under Chapter 5C of the Corporations Act
is a financial product. Note however that item 24D applies to conveyances only,
and not an issue of units. This can present problems in the context of a public
float, where the unit trust does not, at least initially, meet the requisite 'spread'
requirements.
(e) NT
The NT provisions do not apply to a 'unit trust scheme that is not a private unit trust
scheme'. Therefore, the provisions only apply to private unit trust schemes.
A private unit trust scheme is a unit trust in respect of which the deed:
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 9
(i) has not been approved for the purposes of Chapter 5C of the Corporations Act2001 (or the corresponding provisions of the law in force in a state or anotherterritory); or
(ii) has been approved for the purposes of Chapter 5C, or the correspondingprovisions of the law in force in a state or another territory, but at least one of thefollowing applies:
(A) no units have been issued to the public;
(B) fewer than 50 persons are beneficially entitled to units under the scheme;
(C) 20 or fewer persons are beneficially entitled to 75% or more of the totalissued units under the scheme.
Special rules apply for the purposes of determining the number of persons
beneficially entitled to units. Basically the rules treat all units held by certain
associated persons (widely defined) as though they were held by the one person.
The drafting of these grouping provisions can have a very wide application in the
case of units held by trustees.
Acquisitions in listed unit trusts are excluded from land rich duty by virtue of section
56K(1A)(a) of the NT Act. This section provides that there is no obligation to lodgea dutiable statement in relation to an acquisition if, at time the interest is acquired,
the 'corporation is quoted (ie. listed) on a recognised financial market'. Section 56T
deems the land rich provisions to apply to unit trust schemes as if the scheme were
a corporation. Therefore, the exemption in section 56K(1A)(a) should also apply to
listed unit trust schemes.
(f) Qld and WA
In Qld and WA, trusts are not covered by the land rich provisions so called. Trusts
are governed by entirely separate provisions which, although have some
conceptual similarities, are substantially different in many ways.
4. When is an entity land rich?
4.1 Overview
To determine whether an entity is 'land rich' there are generally 2 tests to apply.
The first test is whether the direct or indirect land holdings of the entity include land located
in the relevant jurisdiction which has a value equal to or greater than a relevant threshold.
This is $500,000 in Tas and the NT. It is $1 million in Vic, Qld, WA and SA. It is $2 million
in NSW. It is nil in the ACT. Except for New South Wales, there has been no attempt to
bring these thresholds in line with market increases.
The second test is the ratio of the entity's land-holdings in all places (world-wide) compared
with its total assets (ignoring certain liquid and other excluded assets – see part 4.3 below).The current ratio is 60% or more in NSW, Vic and WA (down from 80%); 80% or more in
Qld, Tas and SA and nil in the ACT and NT.
As discussed below, the tests for determining the value of an entity's land holdings and
other property are applied on a 'subsidiary' (or in NSW and Vic, 'linked entity') inclusive
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 10
basis. This means that in order to determine whether an entity is land rich you are, inaddition to the landholdings and other property of the entity in which a relevant interest is
acquired, also required to take into account interests held by relevant downstream entities.
In Queensland, the two tests are applied separately to the parent and then to the parent
and subsidiaries together. If the corporation is land rich under either of these tests, it is a
land rich corporation. This prevents a (parent) company which is land rich in its own right
from failing the land rich tests on the basis that it has subsidiaries with significant non land
assets.
The issues commonly raised by the land rich tests in the various states include:
• What landholdings are caught?
• What assets do you count (or not count) for the purposes of calculating the total
value of the entity's assets? As highlighted below, there are some notable
differences between the various jurisdictions.
• How and to what extent is property (including land) held by downstream entities
relevant?
4.2 What landholdings are caught?
For the purposes of the land rich provisions in NSW, Vic, Tas and the ACT, a landholding
is an interest in land other than the estate or interest of a mortgagee, chargee or othersecured creditor or a profit a prendre.7
However, an interest in land:
• is not a land holding of a private company unless the interest of the private
company in the land is a beneficial interest; and
• is not a land holding of a unit trust scheme unless the interest is held by the
trustees in their capacity as trustees of the scheme.
In Qld, a corporation's land holdings means:
(a) the corporation's interest in land and anything fixed to the land that may be separatelyowned from the land other than:
(i) a security interest; or
(ii) an interest in a trust;
(b) rights held by the corporation that:
(i) relate to, or affect, the use of the corporation's land and other land; and
(ii) enhance the value of the corporation's land;
(c) an interest in land, and anything fixed to the land, that is the subject of a purchaseagreement or sale agreement made by the corporation.
7 As to the nature of a profit a prendre refer to paper by Michael Perez, "Equitable Interests" available athttp://www.aar.com.au/pubs/tax/taxsep03.htm
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 11
In Qld, regard should be had to the definition of 'interest' in the Acts Interpretation Act 1936(Qld). It is a wide definition and captures a much broader range of interests in land than
might usually come to mind.
Arising from the decision in Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Qld) v MIM Holdings Limited
(99 ATC 4145), paragraph (b) is an interesting extension to what might ordinarily be
regarded as an interest in land.
In SA, the focus is on the 'land assets' of the entity which covers any interest in land,
including a right to explore for minerals, petroleum or other substances on land or to
recover minerals, petroleum or any other substance from land'. This extended definition is
notable as it picks up interests which might not be caught in some other states. For
example, Qld specifically excludes a right to explore for minerals or petroleum from being
an interest in land8. Whether an interest in an exploration or other mining tenement would
amount to an interest in land in other jurisdictions depends upon the construction of the
applicable mining and petroleum legislation.
The WA and NT legislation is concerned with whether a corporation is 'entitled to land'. In
this context, entitled means 'beneficially entitled'9. Land includes a mining tenement 10 andalso includes any estate or interest in land and anything fixed to land including anything
that is, or purports to be, the subject of ownership separate from the land.
4.3 Excluded Assets
All jurisdictions, other than the ACT and NT11, focus on the proportionate value of the
entity's landholdings compared with other assets. At a practical level, this is often what
determines whether a particular entity is land rich , given the present low dollar value
thresholds.
The relevant threshold varies between 60% and 80% depending on the jurisdiction. As
noted, there is no threshold in the ACT or NT where the only test is whether the entity haslandholdings worth more than the relevant dollar threshold (which is $500,00 in the NT and
nil in the ACT).
In the jurisdictions where there is a threshold test certain property is excluded in working
out the unencumbered value of all of the entity's property (necessary to determine whether
the threshold test is satisfied).
In NSW, the following types of property are not counted:
(i) cash, whether in Australian or other currency;
(ii) money on deposit with any person, negotiable instruments or debt securities;
8 Refer to the definition of 'land' in schedule 6, Duties Act 2001 (Qld) which specifically excludes from the definition of landcertain exploration interests arising under Qld mining and petroleum legislation.
9 Section 76(1) Stamp Act 1921 (WA); section 56C(1) Taxation (Administration) Act 1978 (NT)
10 Refer to definition of 'mining tenement' in section 76(1) of the Stamp Act 1921 (WA).
11 The absence of any proportionate threshold means that the NT and in particular ACT provisions can apply to virtually anyprivate company or private unit trust that owns land in these jurisdictions (subject to the requirement in the NT that the totalNT landholdings be worth at least $500,000).
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 12
(iii) loans that, according to the terms, are to be repaid on demand by the lender orwithin 12 months after the date of the loan;
(iv) if the land holder is a private unit trust scheme or a wholesale unit trust scheme,loans to persons who, in relation to a trustee or beneficiary of the scheme, areassociated persons;
(v) if the land holder is a private company, loans to persons who, in relation to thecompany or a majority shareholder or the director of the company, are associatedpersons;
(vi) land use entitlements;
(vii) units or shares in a linked entity of the land holder; and
(viii) property consisting of an interest as a beneficiary in a discretionary trust.
In addition, property is not counted if the land holder is unable to satisfy the Commissioner
that the property was obtained otherwise then to reduce, for the purposes of the land
holder provisions, the ratio of its landholdings in all places, whether within or outside
Australia, to the unencumbered value of all its property.
The position in Vic, Tas and Qld is substantially the same, except that:
(a) Qld and Vic also exclude amounts paid (ie the deposit) and due (ie the balance
owing) under uncompleted agreements for the sale of land made by the
corporation or a relevant downstream entity;
(b) Qld excludes amounts of unpaid capital; and
(c) Qld does not exclude land use entitlements.
The categories of excluded assets in SA are substantially the same as in the other statesalready mentioned (broadly, cash and other liquid assets).
The categories of excluded assets in WA are quite different. In addition to the types of
property outlined above the following are also excluded:
(i) property consisting of rights or interests under a sales contract (including a forwardsales contract) relating to minerals, primary produce or other commodities;
(ii) a licence or patent or other intellectual property (including knowledge or informationthat has a commercial value) relating to any process, technique, method, design orapparatus to:
(A) locate, extract, process, transport or market minerals; or
(B) grow, rear, breed, maintain, produce, harvest, collect, process or transportor market primary products;
(iii) stores, stockpiles or holdings of minerals or primary products (processed orunprocessed) produced by the company or a related person;
(iv) future tax benefits (whether in the nature or tax losses, capital losses, foreignlosses or foreign tax credits) under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 or theIncome Tas Assessment Act 1936 or similar benefits under the laws of anotherjurisdiction.
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 13
Paragraph (iv) is unique to WA. In the other states and territories, it remains an openquestion as to whether tax losses constitute property of a corporation (see EIE Ocean BV v
Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Qld) [1998] 1 Qd R 36).
This is only a summary of the relevant categories and despite some similarities between
states, there are sometimes subtle, yet important, differences in the way that a particular
category is expressed. It is always necessary to look closely at the particular categories,
since it can mean the difference between the entity being, or not being, land rich.
4.4 Tracing Landholdings
Every jurisdiction has comprehensive tracing provisions which basically mean that, in
addition to any interest in land or other property that an entity holds in its own right, it is
also taken to hold an interest in land or other property held by certain downstream entities.
Traditionally, tracing focussed on the interests of subsidiaries, which generally required an
economic interest in the downstream entity of more than 50%. However, in recent times,
this requirement has changed and some states now provide for tracing through to
downstream entities in which the head entity has an economic interest of 20% or more.
(a) NSW and Vic
In NSW, landholdings are traced between entities where there is a 20% or more
ownership relationship between the entities.
In order for an entity to be a linked entity of a unit trust or a private company (the
principal entity), the principal entity must be entitled to receive not less than 20%of the unencumbered value of the property of the underlying entity if all the persons
in the chain (other than the principal entity) were to be wound up.
Example:
A company (the head company) has a 20% interest in company B which in turnhas a 20% interest in company C. As the head company would not be entitled to20% or more of the unencumbered value of all the property of company C,company C will not be a linked entity of the head company (even though companyC is a linked entity of company B). The head company would only be entitled to 4%of the unencumbered value of property of company C.
The provisions preclude tracing through any public unit trust scheme, wholesale
unit trust scheme or a company whose shares are listed on the ASX or an
exchange of the World Federation of Exchanges.
Special rules apply for tracing interests through discretionary trusts. In general
terms, any beneficiary in whose favour capital of the trust may be applied (whether
following the exercise of a discretion or on default) is taken to own or be entitled to
100% of the property the subject of the trust.
The position in Vic is substantially the same as in NSW, requiring you to trace
through to the land and other property to which an entity is entitled to through a
linked entity.
However, under the Vic provisions, there is no minimum ownership requirement for
an entity to be a linked entity of another entity. Rather than focussing on
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 14
ownership interests in an entity in order to identify it as a linked entity, the focus ison the head entity's entitlement to underlying land and other property of ultimate
underlying entities (regardless of ownership interests).
According to the explanatory memorandum to the State Taxation Acts (Tax
Reform) Act 2004 which introduced the new Vic provisions:
[The] section requires the Commissioner to look at any property held separatelyfrom the land holder and if 20% or more of it would move up to the land holder ifany holding structures were wound up, it is to be included. The relevant entitlementof the land holder is to the property, not necessarily linked to any linked entity.
Consequently, under the Vic provisions the interest that an entity holds in land or
other property held by a downstream entity is the proportion of the land or other
property that the entity would be entitled to receive if all linked entities in the chain
were wound up (as opposed to the entire interest held by the downstream entity).
Land or other property is not counted (ie not attributed to the entity for land rich
duty purposes), unless at least 20% of it is received ultimately from linked entities
on a winding up.
You do not trace through land or other property held by natural persons (even
those acting as trustee) or through any public unit trust or listed company.
(b) ACT and Tas
The position in the ACT and Tas is more traditional (in a land rich duty sense). In
addition to any interest in land or other property that it may hold in its own right an
entity is taken to hold an interest in land and other property held by its subsidiary.
The value of the land or other property that an entity is taken to hold by virtue of its
interest in a subsidiary is that portion which the entity would be entitled to on a
winding up of the subsidiary and every other subsidiary in the ownership chain.
In other words, an entity is only attributed with an interest in the land and other
property of a downstream entity to the extent that the upstream entity would be
entitled to that property on a winding up of the downstream entity.
A private company (Company A) is a subsidiary of another private company
(Company B) if the Company A is a subsidiary of Company B within the meaning
of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The Corporations Act concept of subsidiaryalso covers control, as well as voting and ownership interests held in a
downstream entity.
A private company is a subsidiary of a unit trust scheme if the trustees of the
scheme, in their capacity as trustees of the scheme, have a majority interest in the
private company. A 'majority interest' means an interest of more than 50%.
A unit trust scheme is the subsidiary of a private corporation if the corporation has
a majority interest in the scheme.
There are no provisions setting out when a unit trust scheme will be the subsidiary
of another unit trust scheme. However, if the head trust has a beneficial interest in
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 15
the property held by the subsidiary trust there would seem to be no need for such adefinition.
Special rules apply tracing interests through discretionary trusts. The provisions
are substantially the same as in NSW. There is however, an ability for the
Commissioner to disregard tracing if he is satisfied that the application of the
provisions in the particular case would be inequitable. No equivalent discretion
exists in NSW although the Commissioner does have an overriding discretion to
treat a particular acquisition as an exempt acquisition if he is satisfied that the
application of the provisions in a particular case would not be just and reasonable.
(c) Qld
A corporation's land holdings and property include those of any subsidiary (unless
the land holdings are held by the subsidiary on trust and the corporation or another
subsidiary of it is not a beneficiary of the trust).
This is referring to the Corporations Act concept of subsidiary.
In addition, each of the following is a subsidiary of a corporation:
(i) a trustee of a trust if the corporation or a subsidiary of it is a beneficiary of the trust(a relevant trust);
(ii) an unlisted corporation in which:
(A) the trustee of a relevant trust (ie a trust referred to in paragraph (i)) has amajority (ie more than 50%) interest; or
(B) a majority interest is held on trust and the trustee of a relevant trust is abeneficiary of that trust.
An unlisted corporation or trustee is also a subsidiary of a corporation if it is a
subsidiary of a subsidiary of the corporation. This allows for comprehensive
tracing of subsidiaries.
In Qld, there is no limitation on the extent of tracing. Once an entity is as a
subsidiary of another entity, that other entity is attributed with 100% of the value of
the subsidiary's land and other property.
(d) SA
The underlying land and other assets of an entity includes the entity's notional
interest in the assets of its related entities but only where the entity has a majority
interest (discussed below) in the related entity, including through a chain of
interests.
Entities are related entities if:
(i) one has a direct interest (ie holds a share or unit) in the other; or
(ii) a series of such relationship (ie direct interests) can be traced between
them through one or more other related entities.
A majority interest is defined to mean a 'proportionate interest' in the entity of more
than 50%.
A proportionate interest is defined as:
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 16
(A) for a person or group having a direct or indirect interest in theentity-the percentage representing the extent of that interest; or
(B) for a person or group that has both a direct and indirect interest in
the entity-an aggregate percentage representing the extent of both
of those interests.
A person has a direct interest if they are the legal and beneficial owner of theshare, or control the exercise of rights attached to the share. A person or group's
direct interest is expressed as a proportionate interest being the highest of the
following percentages:
(1) voting rights at a general meeting of shareholders;
(2) entitlement to participate in dividends or distributions ofincome; and
(3) entitlement to participate in the distribution of assets on a
winding up of the private entity.
Consequently, an entity can be attributed with a notional interest in the assets of an
underlying related entity based on its ability to vote or receive dividends. A right tocapital (on winding up or otherwise) is not required in order for the tracing rules to
apply (compare NSW and Vic).
An indirect interest can be traced through one or more private entities even where
there is a 50% or less interest held between private entities in the chain. However,
an indirect interest cannot be traced if one of the entities in the chain is a listed
company.
(e) WA
The position in WA is largely similar to that in Qld.
In general, a company is taken to be entitled to the whole of the interest held by itssubsidiary (ie. to the extent that the subsidiary is entitled), and not just the amount
referable to the company's interest in the subsidiary.
(f) NT
In the NT, a corporation is deemed to be entitled to land or other property to the
extent that a subsidiary is entitled to that land or other property (which is akin toQld and WA).
Notably, a trustee of a trust in which a company or its subsidiary has an interest
(or, in the case of a discretionary trust, may benefit from) will only be regarded as a
subsidiary if, at the time of the relevant acquisition, the company or subsidiary is
entitled to more than 50% of the value of the property held by the trust. This is a
significant concession compared with the other states which, it is submitted, is
more consistent with subsidiary treatment of corporations (ie. there must be a
majority interest in the trust for its property to be attributed).
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 17
4.5 Uncompleted contracts
In each jurisdiction, specific rules apply where a land holder has entered into an agreement
to buy or sell land and/or other property.
Broadly, both parties under an uncompleted agreement for the transfer of land are taken to
be separately entitled to the whole of the land.
In other words, the most advantageous position for the revenue is adopted.
Each jurisdiction has provisions dealing with the reassessment of duty if the contract is
completed, rescinded or annulled.
The SA provisions do not deal specifically with uncompleted contracts in relation to land or
other property. There is however a specific provision dealing with the valuation of interests
in land under uncompleted contracts or options.
Section 100 provides:
If an interest in land consists of an interest arising under a contract or option to purchase theland, the interest is to be valued, for the purposes of this Part, by subtracting from themarket value of the land the amount that the purchaser under the contract or the holder ofthe option would be required to pay in order to complete the purchase.
In other words, the purchaser is treated as having an interest equivalent only to the amount
of any deposit it has paid. This is a significant departure from the position in most other
states.
In WA, NSW and Vic the following rules apply to uncompleted contracts relating to property
other than land:
(i) where the land holder is the seller-the agreement is taken to have been
completed;
(ii) where the land holder is the acquirer-the agreement is disregarded.
The effect of these rules is that property, other than land, which is subject to contract is not
counted for the purposes of working out whether an entity is land rich.
5. Trigger for duty
5.1 Relevant Acquisition
If an entity is 'land rich' the final requirement to trigger a liability to duty is a relevant
acquisition, being the acquisition of a sufficient percentage interest in the land rich entity.
In NSW, Vic and the NT a relevant acquisition arises, broadly speaking, where a person
acquires an interest of 50% or more (although the trigger is 20% or more for private unit
trusts (not being wholesale trusts) in NSW and Vic). In Qld, Tas, WA, SA and the ACT the
threshold is more than 50%.
Duty is also imposed on the acquisition of a 'further interest' (ie increasing an existing
majority interest).
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 18
The particular provisions in each jurisdiction are discussed in further detail below.
(a) NSW and Vic
A liability for land rich duty arises when a relevant acquisition is made. However,
in every case this is dependent upon a person acquiring an interest in the land
holder.
A person has an interest in a land holder if the person has an entitlement (other
than as a creditor or other person to whom the land holder is liable) to a distribution
of property from the land holder on a winding up of the land holder or otherwise.
The Vic provisions speak of a person having a 'beneficial entitlement' to a
distribution of property from the land holder. NSW refers only to the person having
an 'entitlement' (which suggests a legal interest).
A person may acquire an interest in a land rich land holder if the person obtains an
interest or the person's interest increases in the land holder regardless of how it is
obtained or increased.
A relevant acquisition can arise in 1 of 4 ways.
(i) a person acquires a 'significant interest';
(ii) a person acquires an interest that, when aggregated with other interests
held by that person or an associated person, amounts to a significant
interest;
(iii) a person acquires an interest that, when aggregated with other interests
acquired by the person or other persons under substantially one
arrangement between the acquirers (referred to in Vic as an 'associated
transaction'), amounts to a significant interest; or
(iv) a person who has a significant interest in a land holder, whether alone or
on an associate inclusive basis, acquires a further interest in the landholder.
For the purposes of determining whether an acquisition has given rise to a relevant
acquisition, the Vic provisions only require transactions which have occurred within
the preceding 3 years to be aggregated under either paragraphs (ii) or (iii). There
is no such limitation in NSW and therefore, for the purposes of working out whether
a relevant acquisition has occurred in NSW, the time frame for aggregating
previous acquisitions is unlimited. While NSW excludes from the calculation of
duty acquisitions made outside the three year period, a relevant acquisition can
occur earlier under the NSW provisions, leading to duty on any additional interests
acquired in the last three years.
Consequently, while it is possible in Vic (and some other jurisdictions) for a person
to gradually increase their interest over time without triggering a relevant
acquisition (and therefore not pay any duty), this is not the case in NSW and
therefore the NSW provisions can apply to a greater number of transactions when
compared with the provisions in the other jurisdictions. Similar issues arise in the
NT, ACT and Tas. The time frame over which a person acquires their interest does
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 19
become relevant to the calculation of duty on a relevant acquisition (broadlyspeaking duty is calculated only by reference to acquisitions made during the
preceding 3 years).
What constitutes a significant interest varies depending on whether the entity in
which the interest is acquired is a private unit trust scheme, a wholesale unit trust
scheme or a private company.
A person who has an interest in a land holder has a significant interest in that land
holder if, in the event of a distribution of all the property of the land holder
immediately after the interest was acquired, the person would be entitled to:
(i) in the case of a private unit trust scheme- 20% or more of the property
distributed;
(ii) in the case of a land holder other than a private unit trust scheme (ie a
wholesale unit trust scheme12 or a private company) – 50% or more of the
property distributed.
The introduction of the 20% threshold for private unit trust schemes is a radical
change from the previous provisions. Changing the trigger for private companies,
and wholesale unit trusts to '50% or more' (where it was previously more than 50%)
is a more subtle, but still important, change.
Broadly speaking, to determine whether a significant interest has been acquired
(which is relevant to paragraphs (i)-(iii) above), you do not count an interest
acquired before the date of commencement of the relevant land rich provisions13 or
at a time when the land holder did not hold land in NSW or Vic, as the case may
be.
The new Vic provisions also contain a particular 'relation-back' rule for the
purposes of determining whether a person has acquired a 'significant interest'. Therule is designed to counter potential avoidance schemes where a person who
acquires an interest also acquires the right to obtain an additional interest outside
the 3 years (and thus defeat the 3 year aggregation rules discussed above). To
address this section 79(4) provides that when the subsequent interest is acquired,
the earlier interest and any interests aggregated with it (ie. which occurred within 3
years), are all taken to have occurred as one acquisition. Similar provisions exist
in other jurisdictions, notably Qld, WA and the NT.
Deemed Relevant Acquisition
The recent Vic amendments have introduced the concept of a relevant acquisition
being triggered as the result of a person gaining or acquiring 'control' over a land
rich entity. The concept of acquiring 'control' is different from acquiring an 'interest'
and is a significant departure from the previous provisions.
12 Includes an 'imminent wholesale unit trust scheme' in Victoria
13 Different in each state for unit trusts and private companies
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 20
Section 79(5) of the Vic Act provides that if, within a 3 year period, a personobtains control over a land rich entity, other than by way of a relevant acquisition
(ie other than by acquiring an interest), then the person is deemed to have made a
relevant acquisition of a 100% interest in the land-holder. This is the case
notwithstanding that persons other than the controller may hold interests in the
entity.
A person acquires control in the circumstances set out in section 79(6). The test is
one of practical influence and control (akin to the definition of control in section
50AA of the Corporations Act which is used to identify subsidiaries of an entity).
(b) Tas and ACT
A liability for land rich duty arises when a relevant acquisition is made.
Making a relevant acquisition depends on a person acquiring an interest in the land
holding company or trust.
The provisions are similar to the NSW and Vic provisions.
Acquisition is defined extensively. Tas and the ACT do not have an equivalent to
the NSW provision which refers to obtaining or increasing an interest 'regardless ofhow the interest is obtained or increased'.
A relevant acquisition arises if there is an acquisition of or increase in a majority
interest. As noted above, there is no limit on the time frame over which previous
acquisitions may be aggregated.
A majority interest arises if the person, in the event of a distribution of all the
property of the corporation immediately after the interest was acquired, would be
entitled to more than 50% of the property distributed. The test is the same for
private companies and private unit trusts.
In determining whether a majority interest has been acquired in Tas you do not
count any interest acquired before the introduction of the land rich provisions or an
interest acquired at a time when the private corporation did not hold land in Tas.
The ACT does not have an equivalent provision.
(c) Qld
Land rich duty is payable on a relevant acquisition, which derives from the
acquisition of a majority interest.
A person has a majority interest if the person has an interest in the corporation of
more than 50%.
A person has an interest in a corporation if the person has an entitlement as a
shareholder to a distribution of the corporation's property on its winding up.
Two points can be made about the Queensland concept of interest:
• it is dependent upon a person having an entitlement as a shareholder; and
• it refers to a distribution of property on winding up only, not 'winding up or
otherwise' (compare NSW, Vic, Tas and ACT).
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 21
A person acquires an interest in a corporation if the person obtains an interest orthe person's interest increases, regardless of how it is obtained or increased.
Some examples are given in section 162(2).
Section 162(3) says that an acquisition of shares is not necessary to acquire an
interest in a corporation.
Under the Qld provisions, a person makes a relevant acquisition in a land richcorporation if:
(i) the person acquires a majority interest (ie more than 50% outright);
(ii) the person acquires an interest that when aggregated with:
(A) interests acquired by the person in the preceding 3 years;
(B) interests acquired by related persons of the person in the
preceding 3 years;
(C) interests held by related persons of the person if the person and
the related person become related persons in the preceding 3
years,
results in a majority interest;
(iii) having acquired a majority interest under either (i) or (ii) for which land rich
duty was imposed, the person's interest increases.
Qld also has a unique provision dealing with the exercise of options acquired within
3 years before or after a relevant acquisition.
In effect, sections 158(2) and (3) provide that if a person acquires an interest in a
land rich corporation and within 3 years before or after that acquisition the person
or a related person (either alone or together), acquires a right to acquire an interest
in the corporation (an option) which is exercised (not necessarily within the 3
years), then the person is taken to acquire the interest within 3 years after the first
acquisition. It is important to note that this provision takes into account options
acquired both before and after an acquisition.
Qld has other unique timing rules which explain when an acquisition is taken to
occur:
(A) if there was an agreement to acquire the interest, conditional or not
and paragraph (B) does not apply- the person is taken to acquire
the interest when the agreement is made;
(B) if there was an agreement to acquire the interest, conditional or
not, and the corporation was not land rich at the time the
agreement was made but is land rich when the agreement iscompleted-the person is taken to acquire the interest when the
agreement is completed;
(C) otherwise-when the interest was acquired (ie when the person
becomes entitled as a shareholder to a distribution of the
corporation's property on winding up).
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 22
These timing rules can be particularly important where you are dealing with entitiesthat will become or will cease to be listed following an acquisition (ie floats and
takeovers).
(d) SA
The general principle of the SA land rich duty provisions is that a person or group
that acquires a majority interest, or increases their majority interest, in a land richentity is taken to notionally acquire an interest in the underlying local land assets of
the entity and is liable to duty in respect of that notional acquisition.
Accordingly, the following transactions are subject to land rich duty in SA:
(i) a transaction as a result of which a person or a group has a majority
interest (ie a proportionate interest of more than 50%) in a land rich entity;or
(ii) a transaction as a result of which a person or a group that has a majority
interest in a land rich entity increases their majority interest in that entity.
The legislation makes it clear that a transaction is dutiable even though the person
or group that acquires or increases their majority interest in the land rich entity isnot a party to the transaction or has a passive role in the transaction.
It is interesting to note that the SA provisions apply to transactions which result in a
person or group having a majority interest, as opposed to acquiring a majority
interest.
One may question the significance of the different wording ('has' versus 'acquires').
The answer lies in section 95(5) which provides that if a private entity acquires a
local land asset and, as a result of the acquisition, becomes a land rich entity, the
transaction is not dutiable under the land rich provisions provided that conveyance
duty is paid on the acquisition of the land. This demonstrates that duty can arise
under the SA provisions even though a person does nothing in relation to their
interest in the entity. Duty can therefore arise because the entity becomes land
rich.14
The different focus of the SA provisions also means that technically the provisions
are capable of being construed as imposing duty where as the result of anacquisition an entity ceases to be listed. In practice though this would seem
contrary to the apparent policy of the SA land rich provisions generally which do
not impose duty on an acquisition of shares in a listed entity.
Under the SA provisions it is also arguable that the acquisition of an interest in a
company which is not of itself land rich (either in its own right or taking into account
the assets of associated private entities) but which has a land rich subsidiary (or
rather associated private entity) may give rise to a liability to duty. The issue arises
because of the SA definition of majority interest, which is defined by reference to
14 SA Stamp Duty Revenue Circular 209 confirms that the acquisition or commencement of possession of interests in landrich entities are dealt with by the land rich provisions.
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 23
person's proportionate interest in a land rich entity. A person's proportionateinterest is measured by their direct and indirect interests in the land rich entity.
Under section 92B a person who has a direct interest in one entity (entity A)which
is related to another private entity (entity B) is taken to have an indirect interest in
entity B. This is similar to (although not as clear as) the operation of the WA
holding company provisions, discussed below.
(e) WA
Consistent with the provisions in most other jurisdictions, a liability to duty arises in
WA where a person makes a relevant acquisition.
A person makes a relevant acquisition:
(i) if the person acquires a majority interest in a company by acquiring aninterest that is:
(A) itself a majority interest in the company; or
(B) when taken with each previous acquisition of an interest in the
company made by the person on or after the relevant day for that
acquisition, a majority interest in a company; or
(ii) if the person already has a majority interest, and they acquire a further
interest in the company.
For the purposes of paragraph (i)(B) above, if a person acquires an interest in a
company (the earlier acquisition) and, after that earlier acquisition, the personacquires another interest in the company (the latter acquisition) because of an
arrangement that was entered into during the 'relevant period', the earlier
acquisition is regarded as having been made on or after the 'relevant day' for the
latter acquisition, even if it is not so made.
The reference to acquisitions made on or after the 'relevant day' for an acquisition
generally means that, subject to certain transitional rules, acquisitions that occur
within 3 years of another are aggregated for the purposes of working out whether
there has been a relevant acquisition. This is similar to the provisions in Vic and
Qld.
An acquisition is not taken into account (ie not aggregated) if, at the time of that
acquisition, the company was not a land holder for the purposes of the land rich
provisions as enacted at that time. This is an important concession which reflects
the recent changes which have reduced the relevant thresholds for determining
whether a company is a land holder under the WA provisions. Acquisitions made
at a time when the entity was listed are taken into account for aggregation
purposes (assuming that the entity was a land holder under the relevant provisions
at that time).
For these purposes, the concept of acquiring an 'interest' in a company depends
upon a person (or the person and their related persons) acquiring beneficially a
right to participate in a distribution of the property of the company on winding up.
The provisions expressly state that a person's interest may increase by a
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 24
cancellation of shares or the variation of rights attaching to shares (section 76(1b)).The definition of acquire focuses on 'acquiring beneficially' which raises issues
similar to those mentioned above in relation to Victoria.
A person acquires a 'majority interest' in a company if the person acquires (on a
related person inclusive basis), an interest in that company such that having
acquired that interest the person would be entitled to participate in a distribution of
the property on winding up to an extent greater than 50% of the value of the
distributable property.
In relation to a land holder that is registered outside WA or otherwise formed or
incorporated outside WA or which is a WA subsidiary of such a company, the
provisions also require you to look at a person's entitlement to participate in a
distribution of the property of the holding company of the land holder. Such an
entitlement is treated as giving rise to an interest in the land holder itself. In some
circumstances a holding company may be a trust. (section 76AR(4)). This is
somewhat similar to the position in SA in that a person does not necessarily need
to acquire an interest in the actual land rich entity in order to trigger duty. Acquiring
an interest in the entity's holding company can suffice.
These 'holding company rules' only apply to corporations incorporated or taken to
be registered outside WA and certain other companies not within division 2).
A person acquires a 'further interest' in a company if the holder of a majority
interest in the company, increases that interest, where the acquisition of
that majority interest was a liable to land rich duty.
Under Division 3 a person can acquire also further interest in a land holder if they
acquire a further interest in the land holder's holding company.
(f) NT
A person is taken to have an 'interest' in a land rich entity if the person has, or
would have on a winding up, an entitlement, as a shareholder, to a distribution of
the entity's property. Like Qld, the focus is on a person's entitlement to participate
'as a shareholder15' in a distribution on winding up.
(i) Under the NT provisions, the concept of how an interest in a corporation
can be 'acquired' is extremely wide.
From 1 July 2004 the concept has been further extended to include certain
declarations of trust, the addition of beneficiaries to a discretionary trust, a change
in control in the trustee of a discretionary trust (where the change occurs within 12
months of a change in control of a beneficiary of that trust and statutory vestings.
These changes were said to be necessary to ensure that the land rich provisions
were 'more closely aligned' with the provisions for direct conveyances (refer to NT
Revenue Circular SD 027 for further details).
15 or unitholder in the case of a unit trust
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 25
A relevant acquisition is the acquisition of an interest in a land rich entity:
(A) that alone constitutes a majority interest in the entity;
(B) that when aggregated with other interests in the entity held by the
person or the person and related persons constitutes a majority
interest in the entity; or
(C) where by the acquisition a person who has a majority interest
(alone or on a related person inclusive basis) acquires a further
interest in the entity.
A majority interest means an interest of 50% or more. Notably, there is no limit on
the time period for aggregating previous acquisitions.
It is worth noting that an acquisition in a listed company is still technically a relevant
acquisition, although there is no obligation to lodge a dutiable statement in such
circumstances (see section 56K(1A)).
5.2 Aggregation
(a) Associates
In all jurisdictions, determining whether a person has made a 'relevant acquisition'is considered on an associate-inclusive basis, which means that the interests of a
person together with any interest held by that person or their associate are
aggregated for the purposes of working out whether a relevant acquisition has
occurred.
The tests for determining who are associates of a person are extremely wide, and
while there are some broad, general similarities in the tests that exist in the various
jurisdictions, they are also quite different.
In all jurisdictions other than WA, the Commissioner has a discretion to treat
associated persons or entities as non-associated if he is satisfied that their
respective interests were acquired and will be used independently and not for any
common purpose (ie not acting in concert).
(b) Non-Associates
NT, NSW, Vic, Qld and WA also have rules dealing with the aggregation of interest
acquired by non- associates if the Commissioner forms the view that the
acquisitions form, evidence, give effect to or arise from what is substantially one
arrangement between acquirers. The ACT has indicated that if it is proposing to
adopt a similar rule that allows for the aggregation of acquisitions by unrelated
persons16.
16 'Revision of Land Rich Duty Rules – Discussion Paper for Consultation – November 2003' ACT Revenue
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 26
6. Charging Provisions
The charging provisions in each jurisdiction operate in broadly the same way in that every
'relevant acquisition' is effectively charged with duty as if it were a conveyance or transfer
of a relevant proportion of the underlying property.
7. Exempt Acquisitions
In most jurisdictions, certain types of acquisitions can qualify as an exempt acquisition.
Generally speaking, duty is not imposed on a relevant acquisition arising from an exemptacquisition. The categories of exempt acquisitions vary significantly between the different
jurisdictions, and some states are more generous in their range of exemptions than others.
We do not propose to set out in detail here the full range of exempt acquisitions in the
different jurisdictions. However, it is relevant to take note of the consequences that can
arise from an acquisition being characterised as exempt.
Under the NSW provisions, interests acquired under an exempt acquisition are still counted
as interests for the purposes of determining whether a subsequent acquisition is dutiable.
DUT028 confirms this approach in NSW. This is arguably also the position elsewhere
other than Qld. In Qld, an interest acquired under an exempt acquisition (other than an
exempt acquisition under section 195) is disregarded for the purposes of aggregation in
determining whether an acquisition gives rise to a relevant acquisition.
Notwithstanding the treatment of exempt acquisitions in NSW and elsewhere it is not
necessarily the case that all interests held by a person are automatically aggregated.
Various jurisdictions quarantine interests acquired before the introduction of the relevantland rich provisions and/or at a time when the entity was not land rich (see, for example,
section 111(3) NSW).
8. Current and Future Directions
The significant changes that have been made in the area of land rich duty, particularly in
NSW, Vic and WA, have been criticised by some as changing the focus of the provisionsfrom anti-avoidance to taxing generally. Certainly, the circumstances in which a
transaction may be caught by the land rich provisions in these jurisdictions have increased,
resulting in an even greater need for taxpayers and their advisors to understand the
breadth of transactions to which the provisions can apply.
One final observation worth mentioning is that although various states have moved to
abolish marketable securities duty, they have also broadened their land rich tax base, such
that many more transactions are now caught than was previously the case. This is
unfortunate, because compared with transfer duty, the land rich provisions are
considerably more complex, making it more difficult for taxpayers to understand their stamp
duty obligations. One may question whether the abolition of marketable securities duty is agood thing, if the 'trade-off' is a more complex regime for taxpayers in the end. Of course,
duty under the land rich provisions is also at the higher conveyance or transfer duty rates,
pjab B0110598722v2 150640 18.11.2004 Page 27
rather than marketable securities rates, and is assessed on gross values, rather than netvalues.
Recommended