View
38
Download
6
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Kõrgkoolide tulemuslepingutest ja profileerimisest Soome näitel. Heli Aru 26.02.07. Teema valiku põhjused. Traditsiooniline näide õppimiseks. 3.-a. tulemus-lepingute süsteem funktsioneerinud ca 10 aastat. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Kõrgkoolide tulemuslepingutest ja
profileerimisest Soome näitel
Heli Aru
26.02.07
Teema valiku põhjused Traditsiooniline näide õppimiseks. 3.-a. tulemus-
lepingute süsteem funktsioneerinud ca 10 aastat. 2007.a. kevadel valimiste järgselt koostatakse uus
hariduse arenguprogramm. The Science and Technology Policy Council, New Policy Report 2006 annab soovitused arengukava koostamiseks. Rõhutatakse – kvaliteeti, rahvusvahelistumist, võistlusvõimet,
struktuursete muudatuste elluviimise vajalikkust, vajadust valmistuda õppurite arvu languseks.
Haridus- ja Teadusministeeriumi delegatsiooni õppevisiit Helsingisse 1-2. veebruar, 2007.a.
Üldine raamistik Soome valitsuse poolt kinnitatud määruses
loetletakse ülikoolid nimeliselt märkides– Õppesuunad;– Õppeastmed: Mag, PhD.
Õppekavade registreerimist ministeeriumis ei toimu. Ülikooli autonoomne õigus on otsustada õppekavade sisu, struktuuri ja arvu üle.
20 ülikooli, 180 000 üliõpilast; 29 polütehnikumi 150 üliõpilast.
Tulemuslepingud (1) Läbirääkimised ministeeriumi ja kõrgkoolide
vahel – Eesmärgid, ressursid, eelnevalt kokkulepitud
eesmärkide täitmise hindamine. Eesmärgid püstitatakse 3-aastaks
– sisulised eesmärgid – “the most important targets on societal impact set for all universities operational targets”
– Kvantitatiivsed eesmärgid (lõpetajate arvud eri astmetel).
Tulemuslepingud (2)Seire ja aruandlus Aastaaruandlus üldiste
Rahandusministeeriumi nõuete kohaselt; KOTA andmebaas (alust. 1981)
– sisaldab statistikat, HM poolt rahastatavate projekti taotlusi ja aruandlust, võimaldab vahetada infot ministeeriumi ja kõrgkoolide vahel;
Kokkulepitud eesmärkide saavutuse hindamine haridusministeeriumi poolt.
2007 –2009 perioodi eesmärgid kõikidele ülikoolidele
Strateegiate ajakohastamine Profileerimine ja mõistliku suuruse
saavutamine üksuste tasemel; Võrgustumine (ing networking); Finants- ja personalikorralduse
parendus; IKT laiem kasutus.
Rahastamismudel 2007 - 2009 Tegevuskulude kate riigieelarvest; Täiendav rahastamine tegevustele, mille
osas ülikoolidel on vastutus (main management responsibility), 35% ülikoolide eelarvest, konkurentsi põhiselt.
Tegevuskulude jaotus– Põhirahastamine ca 70%, – Projektirahastamine ca 6.5%– Preemia (tulemuste saavutamine) ca 23.5%
CORE FUNDING 2007-2009
- National tasks - Other societal tasks - Open university education - Innovation and regional activities
- Master's degree targets (335 M€)
- Research activity(50 M€) - Graduate schools (40 M€) - Doctoral degree targets (173 M€) - Artistic activity (3 M€)
- Extent factor for funding period 04-06
Societal service
mission (87 M€, 10%)
Education (335 M€, 37%)
Research, researcher
education and artictic activity
(266 M€, 30%)
Extent factor
(208 M€, 23%)
CORE FUNDING (896 M€)
Kriteeriumid tulemuslepingutes Societal impact and quality
– centres of excellence in research – scientific publications – centres of excellence in education – centres of excellence in adult education – centres of excellence in artistic activity– internationalisation– innovations and regional impact
Operational efficiency, study processes– Bachelor's degrees – Master's degrees– Doctoral degrees– open university education
Human resources
Projektide rahastamine Changes in project funding
– more strategic approach to project funding – focussed on projects supporting national
development policies and equipping the new buildings
– the number of projects funded will be cut down – broader and more diversified joint projects
between universities will be constructed – project funding requires significant own funding
from the university
Rahastatavate projektide teemad
Regional and societal impact Biotechnology Nano-programme Internationalisation Quality assurance Development of the study process Business knowldge and entrepreneurship National health project Teacher training Structural development Information society Joint projects between universities (incl. networks) Projects for developing and equipping premises
Rahvuslikud eesmärgid strukturaalseks arendamiseks Strengthened quality, efficiency and
effectiveness of activities and increased level of knowledge
Enhanced functioning of the public research system
Strengthened internationalisation and competitiveness
Appropriate size of the education system Appropriate resource allocation
Strukturaalse arendamise põhimõtted Regional HE system will be secured in the future
– the volume of the HE system does not grow anymore The unit and institutional structures will be
remodelled Diversified and multidisciplinary HEIs form a basis
for future innovations The structures of the HE system may vary
regionally
Strukturaalse arendamise põhimõtted The HE system based on a dual structure
– both sectors have their own mission and profiles The HE system will be developed as an entity
consisting of universities, polytechnics and new consortia/combinations based on cooperation agreements between them
Overlapping educational provision of universities and poytechnics will be cut down/pruned back while taking care of the educational needs of the society – e.g. utilising the possibilities of the new degree
structures
Strukturaalse arendamise põhimõtted The knowledge structures and management of
HEIs will be developed– universities: target of 5-10 professors/ department,
with the body of researchers large enough and of high quality, modern infrastructure and necessary services
– polytechnics: combining programmes and responsibilities as to provide education in degree programmes for groups of min. 40 beginning students
– developing professional management – strengthening the financial autonomy of universities
Strukturaalse arendamise põhimõtted University centres will be establised as
agreement-based consortia, consisting of local polytechnics and participating universities
University continuing education structures will be re-organised primarily as corporations
Open university education will be a nationally coordinated entity
Joint structures between HEIs and other actors will be developed to strengthen the impact of education and research services
Strukturaalse arendamise põhimõtted Units will be reassembled into larger
entities Existing structures will be dissambled
to avoid overlaps Diversified and multidisciplinarity HEIs
form a basis for future innovations In R&D the profiles and focus areas of
HEIs will be strengthened.
Strukturaalse arendamise põhimõtted Distribution of work between universities and
polytechnics to raise quality and avoid overlap– reviews: economics and business administration, fine
arts
– other fields: health care and social services, tourism
– polytechnic Master's degrees - university Master's programmes
– recognition of prior learning - working group 15.12.2006
Eesmärkidelt tegudele: polütehnikumid Objective: reassembling the unit structure into
larger and more effective units Polytechnic merger projects
– Haaga-Helia, Stadia-EVTEK-Laurea, Svenska Yrkeshögskolan-Yrkeshöskolan Sydväst
Changes in unit structures– degree education for youth will be ending in 13 units
in 11 localities Swedish education will concentrate
– Turku polytechnic and Central Ostrobothnia polytechnic have given up Swedish programmes
Ajaraamistik 2006.a. Kevadistel läbirääkimistel
strukturaalsed arengusuunad läbirääkimiste teema;
Augustiks 2006 paluti ülikoolidelt nende initsiatiive ümberkorraldusteks;
Oktoobris 2006.a. alustati esimeste projektide rahastamisega;
Teema on jätkuvalt päevakorras, 2007.a. läbirääkimistel.
Kuopio Ülikool ja Joensuu Ülikool
UKu and UJo proposed to establish a joint university federation
Objective: far-reaching shared operating structure (based on current educational responsibilities) with implementation plan and schedule
The planning group chaired by Professor Reijo Vihko
DL 16.2.2007
Turu Ülikool ja Turu School of Economics and Business Administration
Objective: developing a shared university consortium
cooperation while retaining the profiles and autonomy of each univesity
The planning group chaired by former MinEdu Permanent Secretary Markku Linna
DL 16.2.2007
OECD hinnang Soome arengutele OECD “Review on Tertiary Education”, Soome visiit 12-20.12.05; Regarding accountability ... “there seemed to be general
satisfaction (on behalf of universities) with lump-sum budgeting, the rights of concluding agreements, appointing personnel and managing the academic profile and activities...”
“... The historical configuration of tertiary education into basically to alternative organisational forms – the universities and the polytechnics – is likely to be simplistic, potentially inflexible and restrictive in terms of what might be needed in the way of instititional responses and contributions .... International experience points to diversification which is extensive, flexible, effective and efficient, and the Ministry would therefore need togive attention to what systems of incentives and steering would facilitate this”.
Recommended