View
52
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Korea’s Performance Management and Evaluation System. 29. June, 2011 Hong Seok, Yang. Policy Analysis & Evaluation Bureau Prime Minister’s Office. Contents. Ⅰ. Ⅱ. Introduction to PMO. Korea’s Performance Management And Evaluation System. Introduction to PMO. Ⅰ. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Korea’s Performance Management Korea’s Performance Management and Evaluation System and Evaluation System
Policy Analysis & Evaluation BureauPrime Minister’s Office
29. June, 2011
Hong Seok, Yang
ⅠⅠ Introduction to PMO
ⅡⅡ Korea’s Performance ManagementAnd Evaluation System
Contents
ⅠⅠ Introduction to PMO
Structure of Korea’s Public Administration
Prime Minister of Korea
Prime Minister’s Office
1. Structure of Korea’s Public Administration
5 Year Single Term Presidency, No Vice PresidentCharacteristics of Parliamentary System : Prime Minister, assembly member may concurrently hold office of as a minister
Presidential SystemPresidential System
Elected into the office by direct ballotThe President is Head of the State and represents ROK in diplomatic relationsThe Supreme authority to make decisions of the administration, Commander in Chief, appoint government postsAuthority to draft bills and to veto legislations
PresidencyPresidency
Ministry of
Strategy and
Finance
Ministry of
Strategy and
Finance
Ministry of
Education,
Science and
Technology
Ministry of
Education,
Science and
Technology
Ministry of
Foreign Affairs
and Trade
Ministry of
Foreign Affairs
and Trade
Ministry of
Unification
Ministry of
Unification
Ministry of JusticeMinistry of Justice
Ministry of
National Defense
Ministry of
National Defense
Government Structure
(15 Ministries 2 Agencies 18 Offices)
Ministry of Public Administ
ration and
Security
Ministry of Public Administ
ration and
Security
Ministry of
culture, Sports
and Tourism
Ministry of
culture, Sports
and Tourism
Ministry of Food
Agriculture,
Forestry and
Fisheries
Ministry of Food
Agriculture,
Forestry and
Fisheries
Ministry of
Knowledge and
Economy
Ministry of
Knowledge and
Economy
Ministry of Health
and Welfare
Ministry of Health
and Welfare
Ministry of
Environment
Ministry of
Environment
2. Prime Minister of the R.O.K
President appoints Prime Minister with the consent from the AssemblyAppointment of Prime MinisterAppointment of Prime Minister
Prime Minister follows orders of the President to oversee the interior and supports the President as vice-chairman of cabinet meetingBecomes the acting President when the President is unable to perform his dutiesAdministrative supervision and Review of state affairsRecommendation of Cabinet members and Proposal of their dismissal
Authority of Prime MinisterAuthority of Prime Minister
Prime Minister : Kim Hwang-sik (2010.10~)
Prime Minister : Kim Hwang-sik (2010.10~)
EducationEducation
CareerCareer
1971 LL.B, Seoul National University
1971 LL.B, Seoul National University
2010.10~ 41st Prime Minister
2010.10~ 41st Prime Minister
2008~2010 Chairman, Board of Audit and Inspection of the
Republic of Korea
2008~2010 Chairman, Board of Audit and Inspection of the
Republic of Korea2005~2008 Justice, Supreme
Court2005~2008 Justice, Supreme
Court2005 Vice Minister, National Court Administration
2005 Vice Minister, National Court Administration
Supports Premier’s efficient control over the cabinet(1) Major Functions & Role of PMO(1) Major Functions & Role of PMO 3. Prime Minister’s Office
Assists Premier’s protocol, media related affairsPolitical stance, congressional affairs
Secretary ServicesSecretary Services
Sets major policy directions in national scalePerforms social risk & conflict managementAnalyzes & evaluates major government policiesPerforms regulatory reform
Ministerial TasksMinisterial Tasks
Deputy Minister forAdministration
Affairs 1
Deputy Minister forAdministration
Affairs 1
Deputy Minister forManagement of
SocialIntegration
Deputy Minister forManagement of
SocialIntegration
Deputy Minister forRegulatory ReformDeputy Minister forRegulatory Reform
Deputy Minister forPolicy Analysis and
Evaluation
Deputy Minister forPolicy Analysis and
Evaluation
Deputy Minister forPolitical Affairs
Deputy Minister forPolitical Affairs
Deputy Minister forPublic Informationand Press Affairs
Deputy Minister forPublic Informationand Press Affairs
Deputy Minister forAdministration
Affairs 2
Deputy Minister forAdministration
Affairs 2
(2) Organizations(2) Organizations
[1973~1998] The
Administrative Coordination
Office [1998~2008]The Office for
Government Policy Coordination
[2008~] Prime
Minister's Office
The Office for the Government Policy Coordination and
The Prime Minister's Secretariat were merged into the
Prime Minister's Office(PMO).
[1963~2008]Prime Minister's
Secretariat
(3) History(3) History
ⅡⅡ Korea’s Performance ManagementAnd Evaluation System
Introduction to Performance Management
Structure of Performance Management
Primary Contents of Performance Management
Current Status of Government Performance Evaluation
Feedback on Evaluation Results
Integrated Electronic Evaluation System
ⅠⅠ.. Introduction to Performance Introduction to Performance ManagementManagement
The effort to improve efficiency and responsibility of the organization by evaluating the result of the goal that the group has set to accomplish
Definition of Performance ManagementDefinition of Performance Management
Definition of ‘Performance Management’ Definition of ‘Performance Management’ (Government Performance Evaluation Act)(Government Performance Evaluation Act)A series of activities that establish the organization’s responsibility, mid- and long-term goals, yearly plan and outcome indicators in the process of promoting government operations as well as manage process and results in the perspective of economic feasibility, efficiency and effectiveness.
1. Definition
2. Background (1)
Initiated in the private sector in abroad, it was actively adopted in the public sector in an attempt to improve government efficiencyCase of USACase of USA Introduced performance management system based on GPRA (Government Performance and Result Act, 1993) Promote results-oriented system management and strengthen linkage between performance and budget.
Until the mid 1990s, Korea had carried out performance management focusing on input and execution rather than performance of individual policy. To improve the previous performance management system, the government has enacted “Government Performance Evaluation Act” in 2006, and began to promote government performance management in a full scale.
2. Background (2)
U.S.A : Strategic and Performance Plan + PART(Program Assessment Rating Tool) Britain : Public Service Agreement + Green Book(Performance Evaluation)
Strategic and Performance Strategic and Performance PlanPlan
New Zealand : Purchase agreement, Performance agreement (Mostly Minister VS Director) Australia : Resource Agreements (Financial Authority VS Relevant Authority) Denmark : Performance Contract (Mostly Minister VS Director)
Performance AgreementsPerformance Agreements
Overseas
3. History (1)
Since 1961, Performance Management System is continuously developed & supplementedSince 1961, Performance Management System is continuously developed & supplemented
① Policy and Program Assessment System(PPAS) of the Prime
Minister’s Planning and Coordination Office (1961~1981)
Introduced to effectively promote the economic development with the lack of resources
② Policy and Program Assessment System(PPAS) of the Ministry
of Economy and Planning (1981~1990)
Discover & expedient each organization’s policy progress control and the cause of weak
③ Policy Evaluation Program of the Prime Minister’s
Administrative Coordination Office (1990~1994)
Check, evaluate, and manage the major policy issues
3. History (2)
④ Policy and Program Assessment and Evaluation System of the Prime Minister’s Administrative Coordination Office (1994~1998) Combine the two evaluation system and strengthen the analyze & rectify function of the government task performance
⑤ Government Performance Evaluation by the Policy and Coordination Office : Institution Evaluation (1998~2006) Evaluate each of the government agency’s result & capacity through the Policy evaluation committee constructed with general specialists
⑥ Government Performance Evaluation by the Prime Minister’s Office : Integrated Evaluation (2006~present) Operate the performance management and each evaluation syntagmatically through Government Performance Evaluation Act
ⅡⅡ. . Structure of Performance Structure of Performance ManagementManagement
Prime MinisterPrime Minister
Government Performance Evaluation CommitteeChairman : Joint Prime Minister-CivilCommittee Member : Private experts, Relevant Minister, etc. 13 members
Government Performance Evaluation CommitteeChairman : Joint Prime Minister-CivilCommittee Member : Private experts, Relevant Minister, etc. 13 members
Central Ministries
Self & Specific evaluation
(Prime Minister · Ministry, etc.)
Local Governments
Congruenceevaluation
(Ministry of Public Administration and Security, etc.)
Other Agencies
Business performanceevaluation
(Ministry of Strategy and Finance,etc.)
1. Organization Structure
ⅢⅢ. . Primary Contents of Performance Primary Contents of Performance ManagementManagement
Establish a 5-year Strategic PlanEstablish a 5-year Strategic Plan
Establish an Annual Performance PlanEstablish an Annual Performance Plan
Examine, evaluate, and feedback the implementation of tasksExamine, evaluate, and feedback the implementation of tasks
Propose organization’s future-oriented mission, vision, strategic objectives and performance targets
Examine the implementing condition quarterly or half-yearlyImplement the self-evaluation and the result of feedback based on the year-end result
Propose performance targets / tasks / performance indicators of the year
1. Outline
Inspect performance status
Inspect performance status
ImplementImplement
Establish Strategic and Performance plans, suggest performance indicators
in advance
Establish Strategic and Performance plans, suggest performance indicators
in advance
Policy improvement, human resources, Structure,
budget, bonuses
Policy improvement, human resources, Structure,
budget, bonuses
Self-evaluation orientedUtilize objective and
econometric indicators
Self-evaluation orientedUtilize objective and
econometric indicators
PlanPlan
EvaluateEvaluate
FeedbackFeedback
National Fiscal Operation Plan, etc.
The main task of performance management plan should be reported In the beginning-of-the-year
2. Performance Management Operational System
3. Establishment of Performance Management plan
Since 2007, the central ministries have been establishing 5-year Strategic Plan and suggesting each ministry’s mission, vision, strategic objectives, and 5-year performance targets Government Performance Evaluation Committee supports the establishment of plan to evaluate the validity of performance indicator and goal system of the central ministries Strengthening the annual performance plan’s relevancy with national agenda, ministerial plans and the President’s directives
Mission Organization’s mission (objective) and major functions
⇩
Vision
Describes the organization’s long-term goals and what it wants to be in the future. Set forth its policy directions and provides motivation for its members
⇩
Strategic Objectives
The organization’s major goals and the directions it should take in the light of its mission and vision as well as the objectives of the State
⇩
Performance Targets
Second-level goals that describes strategic objectives in detail; actions to be achieved in a set period
⇩
Performance Indicators
Quantitative or qualitative indices for the level of achievement of policies of performance targets and tasks
4. Departmental Performance Management Plan
Actualization of mission and goal
ⅣⅣ. . Current Status of Government Current Status of Government Performance EvaluationPerformance Evaluation
1. Integration of individual evaluations
Evaluation which had been separately implemented by specific identification was integrated by Government Performance Evaluation Act It has improved evaluation efficiency, reduced the organization’s burden by the upgrade of integrated evaluation, evaluate method and index of the center ministries ※ Relevant Authority of the whole evaluation process: Prime Minister’s Office, the Ministry of Public Administration and Security, the Ministry of Strategy and Finance
Significance
2. Implementation of Self-evaluation
Under the control of the central administrative head, an organization prepares the self-evaluation system and implements the establishment of performance plan and utilizes the results autonomously
Ensure responsibility and autonomyEnsure responsibility and autonomy
Self-evaluation is implemented after the construction of Self-evaluation committee consisted of civil experts and the establishment of the central administrative head's self-evaluation plan ※ Self-evaluation committee: 10-30 people each, 10-year-critiera: total 39 organizations 920 people Evaluation colligation engine check the results of each part and enhance the credibility, objectivity of the self-evaluation program
Plan establishment and self-evaluationPlan establishment and self-evaluation
3. Implementation of Specific evaluation
Prime Minister evaluates the necessary policies intended for the central ministries to manage state affairs Based on the Annual Performance Plan, implement evaluation and establish evaluation committee composed of non-public officials Results of certain evaluation are determined by the evaluation committee’s deliberation and resolution, and feedbacks of each department should be reflected on the beginning-of-the-year ministerial plan
Category DetailsSelf-evaluation
Major policies Evaluate policies that a central ministry withes to promote with priority within a prescribed time period for achievement of performance targetsFinancial performance Evaluate general spending programs, R&D projects and information and technologyAdministration management competency
Evaluate efforts and performance in the areas of human resources, organization and information and technology management that are planned to be achieved within a set time period
Specific evaluation
Core task Evaluate core functions of the entity and its relevancy with key issues of national affairsJob creation Evaluate tasks related to major job creationGreen-growth Evaluate policies related to national strategy for green growth and execution of central promotion planPolicy management competency Evaluate policy issue management, relationship competency such as coordination, integration and implementation management
Policy PR Evaluate PR planning for major policies, new media PR activities an policy PR outcomeRegulatory reform Evaluate appropriateness/relevancy of regulations, outcome of regulatory reform, customer satisfaction from regulatory reformCustomer satisfaction Evaluate satisfaction of core policies of each ministry, satisfaction of services provided to Korean people
4. Evaluation Cases (Year 2010)
ⅤⅤ. . Feedback on Evaluation ResultsFeedback on Evaluation Results
1. Feedback at the Level of Organization
The head of central ministry implements corrective measures or auditing about self-evaluation and problems associated with inspection results and submits results to the government performance evaluation committee. The head of central ministry submits measures to improve results of specific evaluation In principle, budgets of projects with insufficient evaluation should be reduced by over 10% or be abolished It is not allowed to increase the budget for projects without sufficient objectivity regardless of its performance
Budget reflectionBudget reflection
Utilize evaluation results by linking with organizational management (establishment, abolition, re-arrangement of HR) In the case of insufficient evaluation results, suggest organizational management strategy and measures after organizational diagnosis
Upgrade policyUpgrade policy
ManagementManagement
2. Feedback at the Level of Individual
Evaluation results of tasks are reflected in HR by linking individual performance Above grade 4 public officials: Job Performance Agreement Below grade 5 public officials: the result of Work Performance Evaluation is reflected
Personnel reflectPersonnel reflect
Government performance evaluation result is recorded on the performance management cardPerformance Performance management cardmanagement card
Annual salary based on performance (high-level officials and chief-level public officials), Bonus based on performance (below grade-four public officials) ※ The ratio of high-level officials’ performance based wage by pay rating(2010)
Performance wagePerformance wagePay rating S A B CPersonal ratio 20% Arranged by organization 10%
Wage rate 15% 10% 6% 0%
ⅥⅥ. . Integrated Electronic Evaluation Integrated Electronic Evaluation SystemSystem[e-IPSES : electronic – Integrated Public Service Evaluation [e-IPSES : electronic – Integrated Public Service Evaluation System]System]
Construct policy managing online systemConstruct policy managing online systemConstruct policy managing online systemConstruct policy managing online systemOperation of Integrated Electronic Evaluation System (e-IPSES) Used on the whole system from Establish performance management plan, Examine implement record, Evaluation, to FeedbackChange the document evaluation to online system It reduces evaluation report’s burden and improve transparencyLinkage of e-IPSES with other related systems Throughout-the-Country BPS, Digital Budget Accounting System, e-Human System, etc.
1. Contents of Execution
e-Saram systeme-Saram system OnNara BPS OnNara BPS
Utilized for task performance contract evaluation
Unification of assignment management system
Send evaluation data
Government Function
Classification System
Government Function
Classification System
Digital BudgetAnd Accounting
system
Digital BudgetAnd Accounting
system
Reflected in budget preparation
Inspect records
Feedback on performance results
Process Evaluation
Establish performance
management plan
Integrated Electronic Evaluation System (e-IPSES)
Integrated Electronic Evaluation System (e-IPSES)
2. Linkage System
※ Best Practice
Thank You
Recommended