View
226
Download
1
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
KENT, SURREY & SUSSEX CRC
Caseload Data
1. Caseload – Number of Service Users
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Brighton Chichester Crawley Eastbourne Hastings Littlehampton Worthing
Sussex Delivery Offices
With 800 service users the Brighton Office has almost double the caseload of the next largest office in Sussex (Worthing office). The Littlehampton office has a very small caseload, no responsible officer and is co-located with the police. The only service users reporting to the Chichester office are undertaking UPW.
1. Caseload – Number of Service Users
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Canterbury Chatham Folkestone Gravesend Maidstone Margate Sittingbourne Tunbridge
Kent Delivery Offices
Each delivery office in Kent has at least 300 service users currently reporting to them. Folkestone and Chatham have the largest proportion of Kent’s caseload reporting to their office respectively. The Chatham office’s catchment area is likely to include much of Medway, whilst Folkestone’s is likely to include such towns as Dover and Ashford.
1. Caseload – Number of Service Users
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Guildford Redhill Staines
Surrey Delivery Offices
The Redhill office has the smallest number of service users attached to it of all the delivery offices across Surrey. Despite this the caseload is still nearly 400.
1. Caseload – Number of Service Users
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Brig
hton
and
Hov
eM
edw
ayTh
anet
Swal
eM
aids
tone
(bla
nk)
Has
tings
Cant
erbu
ryEa
stbo
urne
Aru
nN
o Fi
xed
Abo
deCr
awle
ySh
epw
ayA
shfo
rdD
over
Wor
thin
gG
rave
sham
Gui
ldfo
rdRe
igat
e an
d Ba
nste
adTo
nbri
dge
and
Mal
ling
Spel
thor
neTu
nbri
dge
Wel
lsD
artf
ord
Lew
esW
eald
enW
okin
gSe
veno
aks
Wav
erle
yCh
iche
ster
Roth
erRu
nnym
ede
Adu
rEl
mbr
idge
Hor
sham
Surr
ey H
eath
Mid
Sus
sex
Tand
ridg
eM
ole
Valle
yEp
som
and
Ew
ell
Caseload by Local Authority (excluding those in custody)
As expected, the Unitary Authorities of Brighton and Medway have the largest number of service users(excluding those in custody) across KSS. Over three quarters of the Local Authorities across KSS are home to less than 200 offenders in the community.
1. Caseload – Service Users undertaking UPW
0
50
100
150
200
250
Brig
hton
and
Hov
eM
edw
ayTh
anet
Swal
eM
aids
tone
(bla
nk)
Has
tings
Cant
erbu
ryEa
stbo
urne
Aru
nN
o Fi
xed
Abo
deCr
awle
ySh
epw
ayA
shfo
rdD
over
Wor
thin
gG
rave
sham
Gui
ldfo
rdRe
igat
e an
d Ba
nste
adTo
nbri
dge
and
Mal
ling
Spel
thor
neTu
nbri
dge
Wel
lsD
artf
ord
Lew
esW
eald
enW
okin
gSe
veno
aks
Wav
erle
yCh
iche
ster
Roth
erRu
nnym
ede
Adu
rEl
mbr
idge
Hor
sham
Surr
ey H
eath
Mid
Sus
sex
Tand
ridg
eM
ole
Valle
yEp
som
and
Ew
ell
Caseload undertaking UPW
Whilst the Unitary Authority of Brighton is home to the highest number of service users, it is in fact Medway that is home to the highest number currently undertaking unpaid work (UPW). Whilst there is a large degree of correlation between the number of service users and the number undertaking UPW in each local authority, Brighton is not the only visible discrepancy.
1. Caseload – Service Users undertaking UPW
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Brig
hton
and
Hov
eM
edw
ayTh
anet
Swal
eM
aids
tone
(bla
nk)
Has
tings
Cant
erbu
ryEa
stbo
urne
Aru
nN
o Fi
xed
Abo
deCr
awle
ySh
epw
ayA
shfo
rdD
over
Wor
thin
gG
rave
sham
Gui
ldfo
rdRe
igat
e an
d Ba
nste
adTo
nbri
dge
and
Mal
ling
Spel
thor
neTu
nbri
dge
Wel
lsD
artf
ord
Lew
esW
eald
enW
okin
gSe
veno
aks
Wav
erle
yCh
iche
ster
Roth
erRu
nnym
ede
Adu
rEl
mbr
idge
Hor
sham
Surr
ey H
eath
Mid
Sus
sex
Tand
ridg
eM
ole
Valle
yEp
som
and
Ew
ell
Proportion of caseload undertaking UPW
There is a great degree of variation in the proportion of service users from each Local Authority that are currently undertaking unpaid UPW. In areas such as Brighton and Lewes (served by the same Magistrates’ Court), only 25% of service users are undertaking UPW as part of their sentence. Most Local Authorities across Kent have around 40% of service users undertaking unpaid work whilst in Surrey this proportion increases even further.
1. Caseload – Service Users by sentence type
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Brighton Chichester Crawley Eastbourne Hastings Littlehampton Worthing
Sussex Delivery Offices
Community Order Suspended Sentence Custodial Youth
The distribution of service users by sentence type is fairly consistent with what would be expected across each office in Sussex. The Brighton office does however have a larger proportion of service users on the caseload serving a custodial sentence. The Chichester office only works with those undertaking UPW, therefore it has no service users reporting to the office on post-release supervision.
1. Caseload – Service Users by sentence type
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Canterbury Chatham Folkestone Gravesend Maidstone Margate Sittingbourne Tunbridge
Kent Delivery Offices
Community Order Suspended Sentence Custodial Youth
The distribution of service users by sentence type is fairly consistent across each office in Kent.
1. Caseload – Service Users by sentence type
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Guildford Redhill Staines
Surrey Delivery Offices
Community Order Suspended Sentence Custodial Youth
Again, the distribution of service users by sentence type is fairly consistent across each office in Surrey.
1. Caseload – Service Users by ward
05
101520253035404550
Hastings
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Eastbourne
010203040506070
Brighton and Hove
02468
1012141618
Lewes
1. Caseload – Service Users by ward
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Rother
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Adur
02468
101214
Wealden
0
5
10
15
20
25
Ham
Mar
ine
Orc
hard
Hot
ham
Bers
ted
Peve
nsey
Beac
h
Wic
k w
ith
Todd
ingt
on
Rive
r
East
Pre
ston
wit
h Ki
ngst
on
Barn
ham
Mid
dlet
on-o
n-Se
a
Aldw
ick
Wes
t
Yapt
on
Rusti
ngto
n W
est
Felp
ham
Eas
t
Broo
kfiel
d
Find
on
Angm
erin
g
Pagh
am a
nd R
ose
Gre
en
Rusti
ngto
n Ea
st
Aldw
ick
East
Arun
del
Wal
bert
on
Felp
ham
Wes
t
Arun
1. Caseload – Service Users by ward
02468
1012141618
Chichester
0
5
10
15
20
25
Crawley
0123456789
10
Hay
war
ds H
eath
…
Hur
stpi
erpo
int a
nd D
owns
Burg
ess H
ill D
unst
all
East
Gri
nste
ad A
shpl
ats
Burg
ess H
ill V
icto
ria
Cuck
field
East
Gri
nste
ad T
own
Burg
ess H
ill L
eyla
nds
Ardi
ngly
and
Bal
com
be
Burg
ess H
ill S
t And
rew
s
Hay
war
ds H
eath
…
Hay
war
ds H
eath
Hea
th
Hay
war
ds H
eath
Luc
aste
s
Craw
ley
Dow
n an
d …
Has
sock
s
Burg
ess H
ill M
eeds
Boln
ey
East
Gri
nste
ad H
eron
tye
Copt
horn
e an
d W
orth
Ashu
rst W
ood
Burg
ess H
ill F
rank
land
s
East
Gri
nste
ad B
aldw
ins
Hay
war
ds H
eath
…
Lind
field
Mid Sussex
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Horsham
1. Caseload – Service Users by ward
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Worthing
0
5
10
15
20
25
Beav
erVi
ctor
iaN
orm
anSt
anho
peAy
lesf
ord
Gre
enW
eald
Sou
thSt
our
Bybr
ook
Gre
at C
hart
wit
h …So
uth
Will
esbo
roug
hBo
ckha
nger
God
into
nW
ashf
ord
Wea
ld C
entr
alBo
ught
on A
luph
and
…Li
ttle
Bur
ton
Farm
Nor
th W
illes
boro
ugh
Park
Far
m S
outh
Sing
leto
n So
uth
Tent
erde
n So
uth
Wea
ld E
ast
Wye
Dow
ns W
est
Char
ing
Park
Far
m N
orth
Wea
ld N
orth
St M
icha
els
Bidd
ende
nD
owns
Nor
thH
ighfi
eld
Saxo
n Sh
ore
Tent
erde
n N
orth
Ashford
05
1015202530354045
Canterbury
02468
10121416
Dartford
1. Caseload – Service Users by ward
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Gravesham
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Hig
h St
reet
Shep
way
Nor
th
Fant
East
Nor
th
Park
Woo
d
Shep
way
Sou
th
Mar
den
and
Yald
ing
Brid
ge
Coxh
eath
and
Hun
ton
Sout
h
Boxl
ey
Hea
th
Har
riet
sham
and
Len
ham
Hea
dcor
n
Allin
gton
Nor
th D
owns
Bear
sted
Stap
lehu
rst
Sutt
on V
alen
ce a
nd …
Det
ling
and
Thur
nham
Dow
nsw
ood
and
Oth
am
Leed
s
Barm
ing
Maidstone
05
101520253035404550
Medway
0
5
10
15
20
25
Dover
1. Caseload – Service Users by ward
02468
1012141618
Swan
ley
Whi
te O
ak
Ash
Swan
ley
St M
ary'
s
Hex
tabl
e
Swan
ley
Chri
stch
urch
…
Eden
brid
ge S
outh
and
…
Har
tley
and
Hod
soll
Stre
et
Faw
kham
and
Wes
t …
Leig
h an
d Ch
iddi
ngst
one …
Wes
terh
am a
nd …
Eden
brid
ge N
orth
and
Eas
t
Hal
stea
d, K
nock
holt
and …
Kem
sing
Otf
ord
and
Shor
eham
Seve
noak
s Nor
ther
n
Farn
ingh
am, H
orto
n …
Seve
noak
s Eas
tern
Seve
noak
s Tow
n an
d St
…
Bras
ted,
Che
veni
ng a
nd …
Croc
kenh
ill a
nd W
ell H
ill
Seal
and
Wea
ld
Seve
noak
s Kip
ping
ton
Cow
den
and
Hev
er
Pens
hurs
t, F
ordc
ombe
…
Sevenoaks
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Folk
esto
ne H
arve
y Ce
ntra
l
Folk
esto
ne H
arbo
ur
Folk
esto
ne F
oord
Folk
esto
ne C
heri
ton
Nor
th D
owns
Eas
t
Folk
esto
ne H
arve
y W
est
Folk
esto
ne S
andg
ate
Folk
esto
ne E
ast
Folk
esto
ne M
oreh
all
Dym
chur
ch a
nd S
t Mar
y's …
Lydd
Rom
ney
Mar
sh
Hyt
he C
entr
al
Folk
esto
ne P
ark
New
Rom
ney
Tow
n
Hyt
he E
ast
Hyt
he W
est
Nor
th D
owns
Wes
t
Lym
pne
and
Stan
ford
New
Rom
ney
Coas
t
Tols
ford
Shepway
05
1015202530354045
Shep
pey
Cent
ral
Shee
rnes
s Eas
t
Mur
ston
Shee
rnes
s Wes
t
Que
enbo
roug
h an
d …
Wat
ling
Gro
ve
Chal
kwel
l
Min
ster
Cliff
s
Milt
on R
egis
Rom
an
Leys
dow
n an
d W
arde
n
Kem
sley
Dav
ingt
on P
riory
St A
nn's
Teyn
ham
and
Lyn
sted
St M
icha
els
Har
tlip
, New
ingt
on a
nd …
Bord
en
Boug
hton
and
Cou
rten
ay
Woo
dsto
ck
Iwad
e an
d Lo
wer
Hal
stow
Wes
t Dow
ns
Abbe
y
East
Dow
ns
Swale
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Thanet
1. Caseload – Service Users by ward
0
5
10
15
20
25
Snod
land
Eas
tEa
st M
allin
gTr
ench
Cast
leKi
ngs H
illSn
odla
nd W
est
Hig
ham
Lark
field
Nor
thD
itton
Lark
field
Sou
thM
edw
ayAy
lesf
ord
Dow
nsH
adlo
w, M
erew
orth
and
…Ju
ddVa
uxha
llEa
st P
eckh
am a
nd …
Boro
ugh
Gre
en a
nd L
ong …
Cage
Gre
enBu
rham
, Ecc
les a
nd …
Wat
erin
gbur
yW
roth
amBl
ue B
ell H
ill a
nd …
Hild
enbo
roug
hIg
htha
mW
est M
allin
g an
d …
Tonbridge and Malling
02468
1012141618
Sout
hbor
ough
and
Hig
h …
Sher
woo
d
Gou
dhur
st a
nd …
Park
St Ja
mes
'
St Jo
hn's
Bene
nden
and
Cra
nbro
ok
Culv
erde
n
Haw
khur
st a
nd S
andh
urst
Panti
les a
nd S
t Mar
k's
Pem
bury
Broa
dwat
er
Rust
hall
Padd
ock
Woo
d W
est
Bren
chle
y an
d …
Cape
l
Spel
dhur
st a
nd B
idbo
roug
h
Fritt
ende
n an
d Si
ssin
ghur
st
Sout
hbor
ough
Nor
th
Padd
ock
Woo
d Ea
st
Tunbridge Wells
02468
101214
Elmbridge
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Epsom and Ewell
1. Caseload – Service Users by ward
0
5
10
15
20
25
Guildford
02468
101214
Mole Valley
02468
1012141618
Runnymede
02468
101214161820
Reigate and Banstead
1. Caseload – Service Users by ward
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Spelthorne
02468
10121416
Surrey Heath
0123456789
10
Cran
leig
h Ea
stFa
rnha
m C
astl
eG
odal
min
g Bi
nsco
mbe
Farn
ham
Fir
grov
eFa
rnha
m M
oor P
ark
Farn
ham
Upp
er H
ale
God
alm
ing
Farn
com
be …
Farn
ham
Wre
ccle
sham
…Br
amle
y, B
usbr
idge
and
…Ch
iddi
ngfo
ld a
nd D
unsf
old
Elst
ead
and
Thur
sley
Farn
ham
Hal
e an
d H
eath
…Fa
rnha
m S
hort
heat
h an
d …Fa
rnha
m W
eybo
urne
and …
Fren
sham
, Doc
kenfi
eld …
Has
lem
ere
East
and
…M
ilfor
dAl
fold
, Cra
nlei
gh R
ural
…Cr
anle
igh
Wes
tG
odal
min
g Ce
ntra
l and
…H
asle
mer
e Cr
itchm
ere …
Ewhu
rst
God
alm
ing
Char
terh
ouse
Wit
ley
and
Ham
bled
onBl
ackh
eath
and
Won
ersh
God
alm
ing
Hol
low
ay
Waverley
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Tandridge
1. Caseload – Service Users by ward
Each Local Authority has at least one ward with a high proportion of service users when compared to other wards in the district. An example of this would be in Eastbourne where nearly a third of service users in the district reside in the ward of Devonshire.
The caseload by ward data is useful in identifying the best location for the delivery offices across the KSS CRC.
05
101520253035
Woking
2. Service User Profile - Gender
121
21
59
68
42
4
81
673
156
368
345
367
39
399
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Brighton
Chichester
Crawley
Eastbourne
Hastings
Littlehampton
Worthing
Sussex Delivery Offices
Female Male
Brighton, Worthing and Eastbourne offices have a high proportion of female service users currently reporting to them. This may just be at this point in time, however, it could also be explained for operational reasons (provision of service, space etc). Inspire hold Women’s only contract across Sussex, however, CRI provide the staff in some of the areas.
2. Service User Profile - Gender
44
75
81
43
43
68
43
81
257
534
574
387
319
416
303
381
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Canterbury
Chatham
Folkestone
Gravesend
Maidstone
Margate
Sittingbourne
Tunbridge
Kent Delivery Offices
Female Male
18% of the Tunbridge office’s caseload is female. Again, this may be just at this point of time but future analysis may indicate a trend.
2. Service User Profile - Gender
98
43
58
470
349
390
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Guildford
Redhill
Staines
Surrey Delivery Offices
Female Male
18% of the Guildford office’s caseload is female compared to just 10% in the Redhill office.
2. Service User Profile - Age
56
11
26
34
30
33
138
49
91
70
72
8
80
108
28
65
54
57
10
80
207
45
112
116
117
11
134
172
30
81
81
87
11
95
86
12
41
37
35
1
45
27
2
11
21
11
2
13
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Brighton
Chichester
Crawley
Eastbourne
Hastings
Littlehampton
Worthing
Sussex Delivery Offices
Under 21 21-25 26-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60+
The age range of service users in Sussex is fairly consistent from office to office. The younger caseload at Chichester can potentially be explained by the nature of those it works with (those undertaking UPW).
2. Service User Profile - Age
22
42
52
40
24
38
23
39
67
116
127
75
80
100
70
75
40
101
83
69
49
72
45
54
89
186
190
126
105
127
95
139
48
106
109
80
68
97
64
95
26
42
67
28
27
43
36
42
9
16
27
12
9
7
13
18
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Canterbury
Chatham
Folkestone
Gravesend
Maidstone
Margate
Sittingbourne
Tunbridge
Kent Delivery Offices
Under 21 21-25 26-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60+
The age range of service users in Kent is fairly consistent from office to office. However, Folkestone office does have a higher proportion aged 50 and above (14%).
2. Service User Profile - Age
53
28
40
112
85
87
77
66
52
151
97
128
102
69
78
51
32
49
22
15
14
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Guildford
Redhill
Staines
Surrey Delivery Offices
Under 21 21-25 26-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60+
Again, the age range of service users in Surrey is fairly consistent from office to office. The only difference between the Surrey caseload and the caseload in the other two counties is that it seems to have a higher proportion aged under 21. However, the difference is minimal.
2. Service User Profile – Ethnicity
83%
4%
3%
2%
6%
1%17%
Brighton
White British
Mixed
Black
Asian
White Other
Other
83%
4%
3%
2%
6%
1%
17%
Brighton
71%
2%1%1%
23%
1%
29%
Chichester
80%
3%
4%
6% 7%
0%
20%
Crawley
87%
4%
3%
1%
5%
1%
13%
Eastbourne
86%
2%3%
1%
6%
1%14%
Hastings
92%8%
8%
Littlehampton
92%
1%2%
1%
3%
0%8%
Worthing
2. Service User Profile – Ethnicity
83%
4%
3%
2%
6%
1%17%
Brighton
White British
Mixed
Black
Asian
White Other
Other
83%
2%5%
3%
7%
1%
17%
Canterbury
85%
1%
2%1%
10%
0%
15%
Margate
85%
2%2%
2%
10%
0%
15%
Maidstone
82%
2%5%
4%
6%
1%
18%
Chatham
86%
2%1%
2%
7%
1%14%
Folkestone
77%
2%10%
4%
5%
3%
23%
Gravesend
90%
0%
2%0%
7%
10%
Sittingbourne
92%
1%
1%1%
5%
0%8%
Tunbridge
2. Service User Profile – Ethnicity
83%
4%
3%
2%
6%
1%17%
Brighton
White British
Mixed
Black
Asian
White Other
Other
84%
1%2%
4%
8%
0%
16%
Guildford
81%
2%5%
1%
9%
1%
19%
Redhill
86%
2%2%
5%
4%
1%
14%
Staines
Across the CRC there is some degree of variation in the proportion of BME service users reporting to the delivery offices. In Chichester, which only works with those undertaking UPW, 29% of the caseload is BME. Other notable areas include Gravesend and Crawley where 23% and 20% of the offices’ caseload are BME respectively.
3. Resettlement – Prison location in regards to CRC offices
The below map outlines the location of prisons relative to the delivery offices.
3. Resettlement – Prison location in regards to CRC offices
Prison Nearest delivery office Distance to delivery office
Elmley Sittingbourne 12.7 miles
Stanford Hill Sittingbourne 12.7 miles
East Sutton Park Maidstone 6.7 miles
Rochester Medway 2.6 miles
Blantyre House Maidstone 11.9 miles
High Down Crawley 21 miles
Lewes Brighton 18 miles
Ford Worthing 12 miles
Bronzefield (not lead provider) Staines 1.1 miles
Send ( not lead provider) Guildford 6.6 miles
Surrey and Sussex
Kent
Prison Location
Most prisons are at least 10 miles away from the nearest delivery office. High Down appears to be the Prison furthest from a delivery office at 21 miles away from Crawley.
3. Resettlement – The current picture – Custody and Licence caseload
0
50
100
150
200
250
Brighton Crawley Eastbourne Hastings Littlehampton Worthing
Sussex Delivery Offices
Custody Licence
Of those service users on the caseload serving a custodial sentence, the majority remain in prison. This is consistent across the delivery offices in Sussex.
3. Resettlement – The current picture - Custody and Licence caseload
0
50
100
150
200
250
Canterbury Chatham Folkestone Gravesend Maidstone Margate Sittingbourne Tunbridge
Kent Delivery Offices
Custody Licence
Whilst the ratio of service users on licence against those in custody is generally consistent with what would be expected across the Kent delivery offices, the Chatham office actually has more on licence compared to those in custody.
3. Resettlement – The current picture - Custody and Licence caseload
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Guildford Redhill Staines
Surrey Delivery Offices
Custody Licence
The ratio of service users on licence against those in custody is generally consistent with what would be expected across the Surrey delivery offices.
4. Sentencing - Requirements across CRC
As would be expected, across the CRC the two most common sentence requirements are supervision and UPW. Over time the Rehabilitation Activity Requirement (RAR) will replace supervision.
3551
2662
958 877
402 391 349 263112 46 73 28
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
CRC Sentence Requirements
4. Sentencing - Requirements by delivery office
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Court - Supervision
0
50
100
150
200
250
Court - UPW
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Court - Accredited Programme
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Court - Drug Rehabilitation
4. Sentencing - Requirements by delivery office
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Court - Alcohol Treatment
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Court - Specified Activity
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Court - Curfew
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Court - Prohibited Activity
4. Sentencing - Requirements by delivery office
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Licence - Supervision
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Licence - Curfew
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Licence - Prohibited Activity
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Licence - Accredited Programme
4. Sentencing – Accredited Programmes by delivery office
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Brighton Chichester Crawley Eastbourne Hastings Littlehampton Worthing
Sussex Delivery Offices
Building Better Relationships (BBR) Thinking Skills (TSP)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Kent Delivery OfficesBuilding Better Relationships (BBR) Thinking Skills (TSP)
Integrated Domestic Abuse Aggression Replacement Training
Drink Impaired Drivers
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Guildford Redhill Staines
Surrey Delivery Offices
Building Better Relationships (BBR) Thinking Skills (TSP)
5. Criminogenic Need – Current caseload OASys results
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Criminogenic Need - KSS CRC
5. Criminogenic Need and provision of services – Current caseload OASys results by gender
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Criminogenic Need - KSS CRC by Gender
Female Male
5. Criminogenic Need and provision of services - Current caseload OASys results by delivery office
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Brighton
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Chichester
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Crawley
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Eastbourne
5. Criminogenic Need and provision of services – Current caseload OASys results by delivery office
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Hastings
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Littlehampton
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Worthing The OASys results identify a great degree of variation in service user needs across KSS. From this it can be determined if the correct provision is currently in place.
5. Criminogenic Need and provision of services – Current caseload OASys results by delivery office
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Canterbury
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Chatham
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Folkestone
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Gravesend
5. Criminogenic Need and provision of services – Current caseload OASys results by delivery office
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Maidstone
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Margate
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Sittingbourne
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Tunbridge
5. Criminogenic Need and provision of services – Current caseload OASys results by delivery office
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Guildford
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Redhill
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Staines
6. Accommodation Need of Service Users - Kent
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Canterbury
Community Sentence Licence
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Chatham
Community Sentence Licence
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Folkestone
Community Sentence Licence
In Kent:• 16% of service users sentenced
to a community sentence were identified as having an accommodation need linked to their offending behaviour
• This was significantly greater for those released on licence with 35%.
6. Accommodation Need of Service Users - Kent
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Maidstone
Community Sentence Licence
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Sittingbourne
Community Sentence Licence
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Tunbridge Wells
Community Sentence Licence
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Gravesend
Community Sentence Licence
6. Accommodation Need of Service Users - Surrey
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%
Redhill
Community Sentence Licence
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%
Staines
Community Sentence Licence
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Guildford
Community Sentence Licence
In Surrey:• 9% of service users sentenced to
a community sentence were identified as having an accommodation need linked to their offending behaviour
• This was significantly greater for those released on licence with 27%.
6. Accommodation Need of Service Users - Sussex
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%
Eastbourne
Community Sentence Licence
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Brighton
Community Sentence Licence
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Crawley
Community Sentence Licence
In Sussex:• 19% of service users sentenced
to a community sentence were identified as having an accommodation need linked to their offending behaviour
• This was significantly greater for those released on licence with 39%.
6. Accommodation Need of Service Users - Sussex
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Worthing
Community Sentence Licence
No Fixed Abode Permanence Suitability Suitability of Location0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Hastings
Community Sentence Licence
7. Female Caseload – Sentence Type
The proportion of suspended sentence orders in Crawley and Eastbourne is higher than that of the other offices in Sussex. Community Orders on average account for around 60% of the caseload in Sussex with the exception of Crawley that only has 4 fewer females sentenced to a custodial sentence than Brighton. The Chichester office only works with those undertaking UPW.
Brighton Chichester Crawley Eastbourne Hastings Worthing0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Sussex Delivery Offices
Suspended Sentence Community Order Custodial Youth
7. Female Caseload – Sentence Type
Tunbridge Wells with the second most female service users in Kent, also has the highest proportion of Suspended Sentence Order’s accounting for 44% of all females in Tunbridge Wells. Folkestone has the greatest number of service users overall, but only has the third most females of all the offices in Kent. The Chatham office has the greatest proportion of female’s sentenced to custody than all other offices across the CRC.
Canterbury Chatham Folkestone Gravesend Maidstone Margate Sittingbourne Tunbridge Wells0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Kent Delivery Offices
Suspended Sentence Community Order Custodial Youth
7. Female Caseload – Sentence Type
The distribution of service users by sentence type is fairly consistent across each of the offices in Surrey. The delivery offices with the greatest number of female service users are Brighton, Chatham and Guildford, located in Sussex, Kent and Surrey respectively.
Guildford Redhill Staines0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Surrey Delivery Offices
Suspended Sentence Community Order Custodial Youth
7. Female Caseload – Main Offence Type
Violence and Theft (Non-motor) are the most frequent offence types, accounting for 23% and 21% respectively of the female service users across the entire CRC. The number of female service users with a Drink Driving offence ranges between 28 and 31 in Sussex, Kent and Surrey, although the proportion is much higher in Surrey due to lower overall number of female service users.
Violence
Theft
(Non-m
otor)
Fraud an
d forge
ry
Drug p
ossessi
on/supply
Drink d
riving
Other offen
ce
Public ord
er
Burglary
Criminal
damag
e
Other motorin
g
Handlin
g stolen
goods
Takin
g & driv
ing away
Robbery
Solici
ting or p
rosti
tution0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Sussex Kent Surrey
7. Female Caseload – Ward
Only 8 wards have more than 8 female service users, with the top 1 being Chatham Central with 13. Of the top 8 wards across KSS, 3 are in Kent, 3 in Brighton and Hove and 2 in East Sussex. Over 75% of wards across the CRC only have 1 female service user.
7. Female Profile – Age
Brighton
Chichester
Crawley
Eastbourne
Hastings
Worthing
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
5
4
8
4
8
12
1
9
10
8
11
16
3
5
8
7
14
32
3
17
19
10
23
22
5
19
13
5
13
13
3
4
8
3
3
1
1
3
1
3
Sussex Delivery OfficesUnder 21 21 - 25 26 - 29 30 - 39 40 - 49 50 - 59 60+
Chichester has the lowest proportion of younger female service users and this could indicate that fewer young females are sentenced to stand alone UPW.
7. Female Profile – Age
Canterbury
Chatham
Folkestone
Gravesend
Maidstone
Margate
Sittingbourne
Tunbridge Wells
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
1
2
4
4
5
3
3
6
9
10
7
11
9
9
11
10
5
8
11
3
10
10
4
6
13
32
23
14
15
19
10
24
5
25
12
14
9
7
7
19
5
6
9
2
5
3
3
7
2
3
1
1
3
6
Kent Delivery OfficesUnder 21 21 - 25 26 - 29 30 - 39 40 - 49 50 - 59 60+
The age range of female service users in Kent is fairly consistent, with Sittingbourne having the highest proportion of under 30’s and being the only office without any females aged 60+.
7. Female Profile – Age
Guildford
Redhill
Staines
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
6
2
4
9
8
8
16
6
8
20
17
14
16
9
9
11
6
9
3
1
3
Surrey Delivery OfficesUnder 21 21 - 25 26 - 29 30 - 39 40 - 49 50 - 59 60+
The age range of female service users in Surrey is fairly consistent across the delivery offices and does not differ that much to the overall CRC distribution.
7. Female Profile – Ethnicity
86%
2%1%1%9%
Brighton
86%
7%7%
Chichester
80%
5%4%2%
9%
Crawley
93%
3%3%
Eastbourne
78%
3%3%
17%
Hastings
90%
3%3%3%
Worthing
The proportion of white British female service users does differ between the delivery offices with the majority around 90%. Hastings and Redhill have the lowest proportion of white British with the difference predominantly made up of other white backgrounds.
7. Female Profile – Ethnicity
100%
Canterbury
85%
1%6%
4%4%
Chatham
92%
3%2%3%
Folkestone
80%
2%
9%5% 5%
Gravesend
88%
2%9%
Maidstone
85%
4%2%
9%
Margate
89%
3%8%
Sittingbourne
95%
5%
Tunbridge Wells
7. Female Profile – Ethnicity
95%
5%
Guildford
72%
6%
8%
14%
Redhill
80%
9%3%
6% 3%
Staines
The proportion of white British female service users does differ between the delivery offices with the majority around 90%. Hastings and Redhill have the lowest proportion of white British with the difference predominantly made up of other white backgrounds. Guildford has 61 white British females and 3 from other white backgrounds and Canterbury’s female caseload is entirely white British with 33 in total.
7. Female Profile – OGRS band (Offender Group Reconviction Scale)
Brighton
Chichester
Crawley
Eastbourne
Hastings
Worthing
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
43
12
41
33
17
28
28
9
20
11
16
15
1
3
3
7
15
4
1
2
2
3
11
2
5
11
1
13
Sussex Delivery OfficesLow Medium High Very High N/A
Of the 56 female service users with high and very high OGRS, 28 also had medium risk of harm (6 to children, 17 to a known adult and 5 to both). Chichester has the highest proportion of service users with a low OGRS, all of which are undertaking stand alone UPW with the exception of 3 also sentenced to Inspire. The 12 Very High risk cases includes 6 service users undertaking Inspire.
7. Female Profile – OGRS band (Offender Group Reconviction Scale)
Canterbury
Chatham
Folkestone
Gravesend
Maidstone
Margate
Sittingbourne
Tunbridge Wells
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
20
46
47
22
29
25
19
43
8
14
13
13
12
14
7
17
4
9
3
4
7
10
4
7
8
11
3
5
3
4
6
8
6
1
5
2
1
2
3
Kent Delivery OfficesLow Medium High Very High N/A
Folkestone has the greatest proportion of low risk cases, with all other offices having around 50% of cases that are low risk. Of the 68 female service users in Kent that are high and very high OGRS, 21 also had medium risk of harm (4 to children, 13 to a known adult and 4 to both).
7. Female Profile – OGRS band (Offender Group Reconviction Scale)
Guildford
Redhill
Staines
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
48
32
34
11
4
2
8
1
3
3
2
11
12
14
Surrey Delivery OfficesLow Medium High Very High N/A
The female caseload in Surrey has a predominantly low OGRS, exceeding 60%. Of the 17 female service users with high and very high OGRS, 8 also had medium risk of harm (4 to children, 3 to a known adult, 1 to both and 1 to staff).
8. Need Linked to Offending – Female service users by delivery office - Sussex
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Brighton
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Chichester
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Crawley
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Eastbourne
8. Need Linked to Offending – Female service users by delivery office - Sussex
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Hastings
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Littlehampton
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Worthing
8. Need Linked to Offending – Female service users by delivery office - Kent
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Canterbury
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Chatham
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Folkestone
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Gravesend
8. Need Linked to Offending – Female service users by delivery office - Kent
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Maidstone
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Margate
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Sittingbourne
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Tunbridge
8. Need Linked to Offending – Female service users by delivery office - Surrey
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Guildford
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Redhill
Accommodati
on ETE
Finan
ce
Releati
onships
Lifest
yleDru
gs
Alcohol
Emotional
Well
-being
Thinkin
g & Beh
aviour
Attitude0%
50%
100%
Staines
• 100% of service users in Chichester have an attitude need, the next highest is Guildford with 74%
• Folkestone and Hastings have the highest relationships need (66% and 60%)• Hastings and Folkestone have the highest accommodation need (37% and 35% respectively)• Gravesend has the highest ETE need (34%)• Hastings and Sittingbourne have the highest drugs need (43% and 40%)• 100% of women in Redhill have a thinking & behaviour need
9. Female Sentencing – Top 10 requirement combinations
These 10 requirement combinations account for 83% of the total current community and suspended sentence orders. Stand alone UPW is the most common sentence, closely followed by a combination of Supervision and Specified Activity. Women’s Inspire accounts for 70% of the service users sentenced to a stand alone SAR.
Supervision, SAR, ATR
Supervision, ATR
SAR, UPW
Supervision, UPW
Supervision, UPW, SAR
Supervision, DRR
SAR
Supervision
Supervision, SAR
UPW
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Requirement Combinations
9. Female Sentencing – Requirements across the CRC
Supervision is the most common requirement with 61% of female service users sentenced to a community or suspended sentence order having a supervision requirement. Specified Activity Requirement’s (SAR) are the second most common with 39% sentenced to a SAR with the majority being women’s specified activity requirements, 171 of which to Women’s Inspire.
Court - S
upervisio
n
Court - S
pecified
Activit
y
Court - U
npaid W
ork
Court - D
rug R
ehab
ilitati
on
Court - A
lcohol T
reatm
ent
Court - C
urfew
Court - R
ehab
ilitati
on Activit
y Req
uiremen
t (RAR)
Court - A
ccred
ited Pro
gramme
Court - M
ental
Health
Trea
tmen
t
Licen
ce - S
upervisio
n
Court - P
rohibite
d Activit
y
Licen
ce - C
urfew
Licen
ce - P
rohibite
d Activit
y0
100
200
300
400
500
600514
328261
57 58 43 24 15 11 11 6 5 7
CRC Sentence Requirements
9. Female Sentencing – Sentence lengths
A higher proportion of female service users in Brighton and Crawley are currently serving community sentences of less than 12 months than elsewhere in the CRC. However, Crawley also has a higher proportion of female service users serving a community sentence of 24 months.
Custody Community Community Custody Community Custody Community Custody Community Custody CommunityBrighton Chichester Crawley Eastbourne Hastings Worthing
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Sussex Delivery Offices<12 months 12 months 13-23 months 24 months 2+ years
9. Female Sentencing – Sentence lengths
A high proportion of female custody cases in Surrey are serving a sentence of more than 2 years. These cases account for 67.6% of all of Surrey’s female custody cases, whereas this figure is 47.4% and 42.2% for Kent and Sussex respectively.
Custody Community Custody Community Custody CommunityGuildford Redhill Staines
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Surrey Delivery Offices<12 months 12 months 13-23 months 24 months 2+ years
9. Female Sentencing – Sentence lengths
Only 157 are currently subject to custodial sentences in the CRC, so the figures may be unrepresentative, however there is currently only 1 female custody case in the Maidstone team. The average number for the rest of the CRC is 11, and Chatham currently has the highest with 23.
Cust
ody
Com
mun
ity
Cust
ody
Com
mun
ity
Cust
ody
Com
mun
ity
Cust
ody
Com
mun
ity
Cust
ody
Com
mun
ity
Cust
ody
Com
mun
ity
Cust
ody
Com
mun
ity
Cust
ody
Com
mun
ity
Canterbury Chatham Folkestone Gravesend Maidstone Margate Sittingbourne Tunbridge
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Kent Delivery Offices<12 months 12 months 12-23 months 24 months 2+ years
Recommended