Industry Day Vibro-Acoustic Test Capability April 3, 2007

Industry Day Vibro-Acoustic Test Capability

April 3, 2007

2

Agenda

• 9:00-9:15 Welcome and Overview• 9:15-9:45 Overview of the CEV and Vibro-Acoustic

Testing• 9:45-10:15 Overview of the Space Power Facility• 10:15-10:45 General Overview of solicitation

and proposal process• 10:45-11:00 Break• 11:00-11:30 Tour 1• 11:30-11:45 Transition Time• 11:45-12:15 Tour 2• 12:15-12:45 Wrap Up

3

General Information

• Facility Safety

• All charts from today’s presentation will be posted to NAIS

• Questionnaire

• Questions may be answered orally during the course of this day.

• Official response will be in the form of an amendment to the RFP, which will be posted to the NAIS website

• Further questions shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer, Ron Matthews

• Tours of limited access areas of the facility are available upon request today.

Industry Day Vibro-Acoustic Test Capability

Project Orion and Integrated Environmental Testing OverviewJune ZakrajsekIntegrated Environmental Testing Project ManagerApril 3, 2007

55

Heavy LiftLaunch Vehicle

Crew Launch Vehicle

Earth Departure Stage

Orion - Crew Exploration Vehicle

LunarLander

Components of Program Constellation

6

Orion Lunar Mission

• Orion and Lunar Lander boosted to lunar orbit

– Up to 4 crew onboard

• Lander descends to lunar surface

• Orion is uninhabited during lunar surface operations

• Lander upper stage returns to Orion in lunar orbit

• Orion returns crew to Earth

7

Orion System Elements

Spacecraft Adapter – structural transition to launch vehicle

Orion consists of four

functional modules

Launch Abort System -- emergency escape during launch

Crew Module – crew and cargo transport

Service Module – propulsion, electrical power, fluids storage

8

Launch Abort Sequence

Attitude Control Motor

Reorientation for

LAS Jettison

LAS Jettison From CM

LAS Abort & Attitude Control Motors Ignited

CM Drogue

Deployment

LAS pulling CM safely free of CLV during abort

9

Project Objective/Overview

Provide Orion Structural Development Unit (SDU) testing and Integrated Environmental Orion Qualification Testing in a “test as you

fly” configuration

•Perform modifications to PBS SPF •Acoustic Vibration•Mechanical Vibration •Thermal-Vacuum •EMI/EMC testing

•Provide test support for Orion T&V SDU and Qualification testing

10

Orion Integrated Environmental Testing Organization

Chief EngineerRick Sorge

PM acting: June Zakrajsek

Deputy PM: Fred ElliottResource Analyst: Suzanne

QuintileScheduler: Jason LabayPP&C: Joyce Wanhainen

Risk and Quality Officer: Anita Tenteris

SafetyMark George- Inst. Safety

Richard Kalynchuk – Environ. Safety

SPF Facility ManagerJerry Carek

FacilitiesEric Patton

LM T&V Engineer Shane Roskie

Test Operations Phase

SPF Lead Engineers and Technicians: Thermal Systems, Vacuum Systems, Instrumentation/Controls, Mechanical/Structural, Contamination, Vibrations, Safety

Design/Build/Validation/Activate Phase

EMI/EMC Principle Engineer

Kurt Shalkhauser

Vibration Principle Engineer

Vicente Suarez

Thermal/Vacuum Principle Engineer

Henry SpeierGRC PBS

GRC Contractor

Prime Contractor

Orion T&V PO

Orion T&V CE

Cx T&V PO

11

Vibro-Acoustic Procurement

• Modify and prepare SPF to handle – EMI/EMC

– T/V

– Mechanical Vibration– Acoustic Vibration

• Critical Path is being ready for SDU testing in December 2008– Requires Mechanical Vibration and Reverberant Acoustic

Vibration Facilities

• Release competitive procurement for the Vibro-Acoustic Test Capability aspect of the project– Reverberant Acoustic Test Facility (RATF)

– Mechanical Vibration Facility (MVF)

– Common High Speed Data Acquisition System (HSDAS)

12

Driving Requirements

• Integrate new vibro-acoustic test capabilities within disassembly (west) area of SPF Facility

• Vibro-acoustic facilities required to be commissioned (verification testing successfully completed) by December 1, 2008

13

Mechanical Vibration Facility

• Mechanical Vibration Facility (MVF)

– CEV Test article ~18 ft dia, 75 ft high, weight ~75,000 lbs

– Three orthogonal single axis inputs (Sine and Random)

• Sine sweep to 150 Hz, up to 1.25g peak (vertical)

• Sine sweep to 150 Hz, up to 1.0g peak (lateral)

• Capability to conduct Random (driven mass is 10,000 lbm) to 7.33 grms

– Capability to conduct modal testing

14

Driving Requirements

• Reverberant Acoustic Test Facility (RATF)– 163 dB OASPL minimum requirement must be maintained

– Alternative I

• 163 dB OASPL; scarred for 166 dB

• Run times of 20 minutes at full level

• Door: 28.5 ft wide, full chamber height

• CEV Test Articles

– Alternative II: accommodate Constellation test article ‘concept payload’ and Alternative I requirements

– Alternative III:

• accommodate CEV & Constellation test articles

• propose design and/or performance requirements deviations to hold cost similar to Alternative I

• High Speed Data Acquisition– 1024 channels, expandable to at least 1536 channels

– 20 kHz bandwidth per channel

15

CEV Acoustic Test Article

16

CEV Additional Acoustic Test Article

Abbreviated Stack with Instrumentation Unit

Abbreviated Stack with Instrumentation Unit

17

Constellation Concept Payload Acoustic Test Article

23’ Dia.

31’

23’ Dia.

31’

Industry Day Vibro-Acoustic Test Capability

Space Power FacilityOverviewJerry CarekSPF Facility ManagerApril 3, 2007

19

Plum Brook Station

20

Space Power Facility

21

Space Power Facility Cutaway View

22

Facility Features

• Largest space simulation chamber in the world• Two story office building (16,000 ft2) with 46 offices

and several conference rooms• Separate Facility and Test control rooms• Assembly Area - 150 ft long x 75 ft wide x 80 ft high

with 25 ton overhead bridge crane• Disassembly Area - (Nuclear Rated) 150 ft long x 70

ft wide x 76 ft high with 20 ton overhead bridge crane• Electrical, machine, welding, and fabrication shop• Three sets of standard gauge rail tracks through

facility• 1.6 km radius buffer zone

23

Vacuum Chamber

– 100’ DIAMETER X 122’ HEIGHT– TWO 50’ X 50’ ACCESS DOORS– 300 TON FLOOR LOAD CAPABILITY– VIBRATION ISOLATION– 10 – 52” CRYOPUMPS W/VALVES– 16 - 48” DIFFUSION PUMPS (DC705)– LN2 BAFFLES AT PUMP INLETS– PUMPDOWN TIME ~ 8 HRS

24

View Through Chamber

25

Facility Architecture for CEV Testing

Assembly and Integration Area

Thermal/Vacuum and EMI/EMC Test Area

Random and Acoustic Vibration Test Area

26

Major Area for Facility Upgrades Vibration Test Area

27

Space Power Facility Plan View

28

Existing Cryogenic Systems

SPF LN2 & GN2 Distribution Systems

– 28 K GAL LN2 STORAGE (60 PSI SUPPLY)

– 200 K LN2 TANK LOW PRESSURE STORAGE

– ELECTRIC LN2 VAPORIZER FOR GN2

– GN2 STORAGE ~ 70,000 SCF @ 2600 PSI

– CRYOSHROUD GN2 RECIRCULATION COOLED WITH LN2 DESUPERHEATER

– LN2 SUPPLY FOR CRYOSHROUD AND DIFFUSION PUMP BAFFLES AND TEST SPECIFIC HARDWARE

– 11,000 CFM COMPRESSORS CIRCULATE GN2 THRU CRYOSHROUD

Capable of removing up to 14 MW of heat

29

Existing LN2 Storage

• 200,000 Gal LN2 storage tank – 3 psi MAWP

• 28,000 Gal LN2 storage tank – 150 psi MAWP

• Vaporization system – 1100 SCFM @ 2400 psi

30

Infrared Lamp System

INFRARED HEAT LAMP SYSTEM

DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS

– USES TUNGSTEN QUARTZ LAMPS– AUTOMATIC HEAT FLUX CONTROL– CLOSED LOOP TEMP CONTROL– VARIABLE TEMPERATURE RANGE – INDEPENDENT CONTROLLED BANKS– 7 MW POWER AVAILABLE INSIDE

CHAMBER

31

Ancillary Facility Support Systems

General Maintenance and certification is in progress for the following systems– Chamber door and bridge systems

– 8000 GPM closed system cooling tower

– Gaseous nitrogen system

– Facility service air system - 110 psig

– Electrical substation - 14 MW available

– Emergency power generator

– Facility Lifting Devices

Industry Day Vibro-Acoustic Test Capability

Overview of Solicitation and Proposal ProcessNNC07ZCH005JRon MatthewsContracting OfficerApril 3, 2007

33

Procurement Process Overview

• Procurement Schedule

• Streamlining Processes

• Evaluation Process

• Communications Process

34

Procurement Process OverviewObjectives of Process

• Fairness Ensure level playing field

• Comprehensiveness If we ask for it, we evaluate it

• Consistency Evaluate against Evaluation Factors – Same depth & breadth

• Confidentiality Debriefings are the only time these findings are mentioned outside the

SEB area

35

Procurement Process OverviewProcurement Schedule

Schedule is the Driver

• Final RFP Issued: Week of April 2, 2007• Site Showing: April 3, 2007• Proposal Due Date

– Volume II Past Performance April 25, 2007– Proposal Due May 2, 2007

• Source Selection NLT: May 21, 2007• Contract Award May 25, 2007• Contract NTP: June 1, 2007

36

Procurement Process Overview

Period of Performance

• Design/Build and Commissioning

– June 1, 2007 to December 1, 2008

• 6 months of Technical Support after Commissioning

37

Procurement Process OverviewStreamlining Processes

• Sources Sought Synopsis issued in Jan. 07– Received Industry feedback

• Procurement Synopsized March 9, 2007• Issued Draft RFP/SOW March 23, 2007

– Received additional Industry feedback– Early Past Performance Due Date

• Compressed Evaluation Schedule• Award without “Discussions”• Model Contract with Proposal• Post-Award Debriefings

38

Procurement Process OverviewState of Ohio Job Ready Sites

• State of Ohio has indicated potential availability of $5 M under its Job Ready Sites (JRS) Program for Orion Qualification

• Funding would flow to local State Governmental Agency (e.g. Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority)

• It is each Offeror’s responsibility to commit in its proposal to enter into a contract or other arrangement with the local State Governmental Agency to take advantage of this funding

39

Procurement Process OverviewEvaluation Process

• Alternatives– Alt I

• CEV requirements only (18’ test article)

– Alt II

• CEV requirements and Concept Payload (LSAM) test article

(18’ and 23’ test article)

• Must meet all requirements

– Alt III

• CEV requirements and Concept Payload (LSAM) test article

(18’ and 23’ test article)

• May trade requirements with exception of 163 dB, price remains similar to Alt I

• Only One Alternative will be selected• See Section M for evaluation process• Firm-Fixed Price Contract will be Awarded

40

Procurement Process OverviewEvaluation

• Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with NASA FAR Supplement 1815.3, Source Selection Sections 1815.300 through 1815.308. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government. The following factors will be used to evaluate proposals:

• 1. Technical Capability• a. Technical Approach • b. Schedule• c. Project Control Plan

• 2. Past Performance and Experience• 3. Price

41

Procurement Process OverviewTechnical Capability Adjective Ratings

• EXCELLENT – A comprehensive and thorough proposal of exceptional merit with one or more significant strengths per project element. No deficiency or significant weakness exists.

• VERY GOOD – A proposal having no deficiency and demonstrates over-all competence. One or more significant strengths have been found and strengths outbalance any weaknesses that exist.

• GOOD – A proposal having no deficiency and which shows a reasonably sound response. There may be strengths or weaknesses or both. As a whole, weaknesses not off-set by strengths do not significantly detract from the Offeror’s response.

• FAIR – A proposal having no deficiency and which has one or more weaknesses or significant weaknesses. Weaknesses outbalance any strengths.

• POOR – A proposal that has one or more deficiencies or significant weaknesses that demonstrate a lack of overall competence or would require a major proposal revision to correct.

42

Procurement Process OverviewAward Without “Discussions”

• Only Allows limited “Clarifications” of Proposals• No “Competitive Range” Determination• No Ability to Revise/Improve Proposal – Offeror’s

Initial Proposal IS its “Best and Final” • Benefits

– Streamlines Procurement Process– Eliminates Risks Inherent in Discussions

• Disadvantages – Precludes Ability to Correct Weaknesses– Precludes Ability to Address Price Unrealism

• Government MAY Still Choose to Conduct Discussions

43

Procurement Process OverviewModel Contract

• Complete Signed Contract Required with Proposal• Consists of Sections A thru J of RFP• Section L – INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO

OFFERORS – This Section tells you what we want you to submit

• Section M - EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS – This Section tells you how we will evaluate it.

• Offeror shall complete and sign Cover Pages (SF1442 Form)– Offeror shall monitor NAIS

• All relevant and useful information will be posted as solicitation amendments

– All amendments SHALL be acknowledged

• Government will Countersign Model Contract upon Selection of Successful Offeror

• If Offeror has any questions or comments on Clauses or wording, the Offeror shall notify the Government immediately

44

Procurement Process OverviewCommunications

• General– Policy is to be as open as possible– Monitor individual procurement NAIS web sites

• Draft RFP Comments have been received and will be integrated in Final RFP as appropriate

• After Final RFP Posted– Blackout Period in Effect– Questions directly to Contracting Officer by April 13th – Shall be submitted in Writing

• Q&A’s will be posted on NAIS

45

Procurement Process OverviewProposal Advice

• Use the Final Solicitation to build your Proposal• Count the Pages Correctly (Technical Volume)

– Anything over the page limit will be removed from evaluation

• Don’t Put Technical Information in the Cost Volume• Use the Specified font• Test Electronic Disks before submitting• Provide Current and Accurate Phone Numbers and Addresses

for all References• Make Sure All Parts of the Proposal Tell a Consistent Story• Proofread, make sure if you reference “Volume X” that you

have a “Volume X”! – These things spell check won’t find.

• Recognize Today’s Security Environment at GRC and PBS Expect Delays at Gate

• Submit a professional product.

Industry Day Vibro-Acoustic Test Capability

Facility Tours &Crane Bay PhotosApril 3, 2007

47

48

49

50

51

Wrap Up