View
216
Download
2
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
How Does Society Value Science?
David BoernerJanuary 28, 2010
Policy = Decisions: Where are the scientists?
“Pure” Scientist• No interest in the situation, only interested in
generating informationAdvocate
• Makes the case for one policy directionArbiter
• Factually answers posed scientific questions Honest broker
• Objectively generates and/or analyzes scientific knowledge for policy alternatives
2
How does society value science?
To every man is given the key to the gates of heaven.
The same key opens the gates of hell.
Buddhist Proverbquoted by Richard Feynman
3
Framing any problem is a key cognitive challenge
D F 3 7
Hypothesis: If D then 3
Which two cards would you check to test the Hypothesis?
One card is trivial, and one other could be definitive.
Imagine a deck of cards with numbers on one side and letters on the other
4
Reframing the problem may make it trivial
Beer Coke 35 14
Imagine enforcing the legal drinking age in a bar by when you know either a patron’s age or beverage
5
Behaviour ispredictably irrational “A Conflict of Visions” (1987)“Tragic” versus “Utopian”• Language• Decision Making• Knowledge• Freedom• Equality• Justice and Law• War, Crime and Punishment• Moral Duty• Control
Twin, family and adoption studies imply political attitudes are 60% heritable!
6
Thomas Sowell (1930 – )
The Utopian Vision
George Bernard Shaw“There is nothing that can be
changed more completely than human nature when the job is taken in hand early enough.”
On the Rocks (1933)
You see things as they are and ask, "Why?" I dream things as they never were and ask, "Why not?"
Back to Methuselah (1921)
7
George Bernard Shaw (1856 – 1950)
The Tragic Vision
Walt Kelly (1913–1973)
8
Human selfishness and cognitive biases are intrinsic, universal traits
Our ability to change human nature is fundamentally limited
1971
Perfectible: communication can be improved through refined use of precise, explicit articulation
Evolved social process, with a complex, consistent inner logic, but not designed by any one person
Utopian Tragic
Language
9
Utopian
Elite & Ideological
Universities tend to rust explicitly articulated propositions from “experts”
Tragic
Inclusive & Experiential
Think Tankstend to trust knowledge that is distributed through society
Informing Decision Making
10
Utopian
Articulated reason of experts – deliberate and ideological rationality - “age of reason”
Social experience of many from past events - recounted verbatim until systemically inculcated
Trusted Knowledge Sources
11
Tragic
Utopian
One is able to achieve their goals – impediments can all be overcome
Tragic
One is able to pursue their goals – but caveat emptor
Freedom
12
Utopian
Equalized probability of achieving the result
Tragic
Equalized opportunity for achieving the result
Equality
13
Utopian
Fairness of results - for the individual
Earl Warren – “But is it right? Is it good?”
Tragic
Fairness of process - to preserve precedent and tradition
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. - “The life of law has not been logic: it has been experience.”
Justice and Law
141891-1974 1841-1935
Utopian
Inconceivable, the actor must not understand their actions. Since deterrence is useless, punishment is retribution that needs to be managed by the elite.
Tragic
Individuals will always put their own interests above those of others. Punishment is a deterrent to be demonstrated publicly.
War, Crime & Punishment
15
Utopian
Sincerity, one should aspire for higher ethical behaviour.
Disingenuous behaviour is intentional and must indicate corruption or prejudice
Tragic
Fidelity, whether one understands why or not.
Advocacy must represent knowing disloyalty
Moral Duty
16
Utopian
Power should be concentrated for efficient central planning, stability and collective benefit
Tragic
Although inefficient and unstable, power should be distributed to prevent abuse
Control
17
Tragic Adherents are
“common” people, unable to understand how the world can be improved and unwilling to listen to experts
Utopians are
an “elite” operating in an extremely narrow reality, unable to recognize grave consequences or incredible costs of pursuing their goals
Perceptions of the other vision
18
Tragic adherents...
must be stuck in the past, focused on understanding the trade-offs and avoiding the costs of change, rather than implementing attainable improvements.
Utopians...
must be naïve to not recognize their goals are unattainable and would require excessive social and economic costs with inconsequential benefits.
Perceptions of the other vision
19
Could the two visions be partially heritable?
20
• The dopamine receptor gene (DRD2), A2 allele is significantly associated with political partisanship (much more than the A1 allele which results in a 30% reduction in D2 receptor density) – Dawes and Fowler (2009).
• Genes associated with serotonin have been correlated with voter turnout
Dopaminergic and serotonergic neurotransmitter systems play a vital role in the regulation of emotion and mood.
Dopamine is associated with human reward systems, social attachments and cognitive function (attention, planning, visual processing and working memory)
Utopian
Science and technology can solve any problem
Training an S&T elite is essential for creating leaders
Human behaviour can be overcome and perfected
Why not change/improve?
Progress at any price
The “best” is the only thing worth having
“Improve it, even if it breaks”
Tragic
Human nature makes ideal application of S&T impossible
Too much training narrows focus and blinds one to other issues
Human behaviour is immutable and flawed
It always worked this way before
Change is too difficult & expensive
The “best” gets in the way of “what works”
“If it isn’t broken, leave it alone”
Two extreme views of science
21
How do Tragic adherents perceive science?
22
Because science was deemed instrumental in winning WWII, Roosevelt asked Vannevar Bush for a science plan
“Science, The Endless Frontier” was rejected (by Truman’s administration), but did result in the creation of NSF (which was meant to be the “National Research Foundation”), but Bush’s underlying ideology was widely adopted…
Vannevar Bush (1890–1974) & Francis Bacon (1561-1626)
Basic > Development > Applied > Wealth> Technology
Benefits are predictable (linear)
Any research funding results in wealth
Research makes contributions to an “information reservoir” that accumulates over time
Research
Applications
Information Reservoir
What does the reservoir model mean?
23Francis Bacon (1561-1626)
• “Plausible Deniability”o Leaves no evidence of wrongdoing or abuse
• “Buyers” and “Sellers” have different knowledge (asymmetrical information) leading to – “Adverse Selection”
o Sellers could be motivated to sell their “bad” products
– “Moral Hazard”o Isolation from consequences could induce excessive risk-taking
• Science is “Self-regulating” (expert review guides decision-making)
Yet a reservoir could have negative implications
24
And we don't know what we don't know...
25
“As we know, there are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns. That is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, the ones we don't know we don't know.”
Donald Rumsfeld, Feb. 12, 2002, Department of Defense briefing
26
Booz-Allen-Hamilton (October 2005) found• 1000 largest R&D investors globally who
spent 384B $US• 80-90% of corporate, 60% of all R&D globally
“No relationship between R&D spending and the primary measures of economic or
corporate success.”
Does research deliver the promised benefits?
Are the reservoir contents truly accessible?
27
And how much of the reservoir is “scientific”?
Positive experimental testing outcomes can NOT confirm a scientific theory
A single genuine counter-instance is logically decisive in showing the theory to be false
Popper proposed a theory should be accounted scientific if, and only if, it is falsifiable.
"Our knowledge can only be finite, while our ignorance must necessarily be infinite."
Karl Popper (1902 – 1994)
28
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Science is punctuated by “Paradigm Shifts”
Observed there is little evidence that scientists use Popperian falsification. Rather they tolerate contrary data until a ‘crisis’ ensues.
“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it." Max Planck
Thomas Kuhn (1922 – 1996)
And the reservoir could be “contaminated”
29
Are we promoting Utopian myths?
The myth of infinite benefit: More science and more technology will lead automatically to
more public good. The myth of unfettered research:
Any scientifically reasonable line of research is as likely to yield societal benefit as any other.
The myth of accountability: Peer review and reproducibility of results are the principal ethical
responsibilities of the research community. The myth of authoritativeness:
Scientific information provides an objective basis for resolving political disputes.
The myth of the endless frontier: New knowledge generated at the frontiers of science is
autonomous from its moral and practical consequences in society.
30
Pasteur’s Quadrant - Donald Stokes, 1997
Can science be better described?
?
Research inspired by end use?
Yes
YesNo
Res
earc
h i
nsp
ired
by
the
qu
est
for
fun
dam
enta
l u
nd
erst
and
ing
?
No
Louis Pasteur
“Use-Inspired”
Niels Bohr
“Basic”
Thomas Edison
“Applied”
31
Is science best described by “motivations”?
Peter Nicholson, 2009
32
INVESTIGATOR-DIRECTED
APPLIEDBASIC
FUNDER-DIRECTED
Heterogeneous / Serendipitous Orientation
Ben
efi
ts A
pp
rop
riat
ed b
y P
arti
cu
lar
Gro
up
s
Ben
efi
ts S
har
ed W
idel
y
Strategic / Mission Orientation
UNIVERSITIESCO
LLEGES
GO
VERNMENT
LABSPRIVATE SECTO
R
• Understanding– Narrow/Deep versus Broad/Shallow
• Communication styles and needs– Factual/Direct versus Perceptual/Nuanced
• Preferred information sources– Experts (Peers) versus Society at large
• Time constraints– Long Term versus Immediate
• Dealing with uncertainties and conflict– Additional work versus Compromise and implement
• Measures of success– Knowledge/Peers versus Societal acceptance/Political
Masters
Two Worlds, two Value Systems: Science and Policy
33
Will conflict always arise over science?Conflict, yes but over visions, not science.
At the interface of Policy and Science I am trying to:
• Understand, acknowledge and address the concerns of both visions, both want science...
• Communicate to satisfy both audiences' information needs (difficult!)
• Counter a Utopian tendency to revert to education and reasoning when they (I) “don’t understand”
• Remember that these descriptions represent extremes – real people generally accept elements of both visions...
34
Thank you!
For your attention and your willingness to listen
Please remember – Statistics apply!
Individuals generally display elements of both visions
andWe need both visions...
35
Recommended