Highlights from Parallel session 10 - Simulation and Modeling -

Highlightsfrom

Parallel session 10- Simulation and Modeling -

Makoto Asai (SLAC)

CHEP03 - UC San Diego

It is the great pity that we could not have Dr. G.Battistoni, who are expected to share the role of session convener.

Structure of sessions

Monday sessionsDedicated to general purpose

simulation tools (FLUKA and Geant4) General status reports Detailed physics models Validation results from experiments

Presentations (Monday - I) Overview of Geant4 recent developments

J.Apostolakis on behalf of Geant4 collaboration Geant4 hadronic physics status and validation for large

HEP calorimetersJ.-P.Wellisch

Status of the physics validation studies using Geant4 in ATLASA.Dell’Acqua on behalf of ATLAS Geant4 validation tea

m The physics models of FLUKA : status and recent devel

opmentsA.Fasso et. al.

FLUKA : present and futureG.Battistoni et. al.

Presentations (Monday - II) String parton models in Geant4

G.Folger et. al. Bertini inter-nuclear cascade model implementation in

Geant4

A.Heikkinen et. al. Geant4 hadronic validation suite for the cascade energy

range

V.Ivantchenko et. al. Validation of Geant4 by the CMS experiment

P.Arce et. al. ALICE experience with G4

I.Gonzalez et. al. for the ALICE collaboration

Tuesday sessionDedicated to Concrete simulation

(and reconstruction) applications for individual experiments Frameworks Requirements Validation results Status and plans

Presentations (Tuesday) The full detector simulation for the ATLAS experiment :

status and outlookA.Rimoldi et. al.

Simulation application for the LHCb experimentW.Pokorski et. al.

Simulation in ALICEA.Morsch on behalf of the ALICE offline project

CDF detector simulation framework and simulation performanceE.Gerchtein et. al.

Using Geant4 in the BaBar simulationD.Wright on behalf of the BaBar simulation group

Overview of GLAST simulation and reconstructionR.Dubois et. al.

Thursday sessionGeometry modelingAdditional talks on simulation tool or

application Interfacing between more than one

simulation tools

Presentations (Thursday) A geometrical modeler for HEP

A.Gheata et. al. for the ALICE collaboration The XML-based geometry description for the STAR exper

iment at BNLM.Potekhin et. al.

TPC tracking and particle identification in high-density environmentM.Ivanov et. al.

Electro and gamma nuclear physics in Geant4M.Kossov et. al.

Interfacing the JQMD and JAM nuclear reaction codes to Geant4T.Koi et. al.

Development of an interface for using EGS4 physics processes in Geant4K.Murakami et. al.

Some highlight slides from presentations

Precision Chambers (MDT)

Encap Trigger Chambers (TGC)

Barrel Trigger Chambers (RPC)

Inner Precision Chambers (CSC)

Gamma-ray Large Gamma-ray Large Area Space Area Space TelescopeTelescope

SourceFluxes

Geometry

ParticleTransport

“Raw”Data

Recon

BackgroundRejection

-Particle ID

SourceFluxes

Geometry

ParticleTransport

“Raw”Data

Recon

BackgroundRejection

-Particle ID

A Geometrical Modeller for HEP

René Brun, Andrei Gheata, Mihaela Gheata

Let me try to summarize…Simulation and geometrical modeling are

quite hot, active and challenging fields. Harder and tighter requirements New SW trends

We cannot stay, but must be evolving. I would like to thank all the contributors.