High Voltage Electrolytes for Li-ion Batteries · High Voltage Electrolytes for Li-ion Batteries...

High Voltage Electrolytes for Li-ion Batteries

Army Research Laboratory Adelphi, MD 20783

14 May 2013

Project ID: ES024

This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information.

PIs: Richard Jow, Kang Xu

Arthur v. Cresce, Kang Xu, Jan Allen, Oleg Borodin, Samuel Delp, T. Richard Jow

2

Overview

• Start: June 2011 • End: Dec. 2014 • 50% complete

• Funding received in FY2011 – $250K

• Funding received in F2012 • $250K

• Funding for FY13 • $250K

Timeline

Budget

Barriers

• Argonne National Laboratory • U of Maryland • U of Utah • NRL

Partners

• SOA electrolytes based on carbonate solvents decompose near or above 4.5 V

• Lack of stable and reliable 5 V cathodes as characterization platform.

• Lack of understanding of oxidation stability and reactive pathway of the electrolyte at the cathode/electrolyte interface

3

Objectives - Relevance

• Develop high voltage electrolytes for high voltage Li-ion batteries for increased energy density – Explore and identify solvents or additives for electrolytes that

allow the operation of high voltage cathodes – Understand the reactive pathways and reaction products at

the electrode/electrolyte interface through computation and surface characterization for guiding the development of improved electrolyte components

– Identify and/or develop structurally stable high voltage cathode materials

4

Milestones

• FY 2012: – Identified LiPFB (lithium perfluorinated tert butoxide) was more effective

than HFiP in improving cycle life in LNMO/graphite cells at RT. – Synthesized Al(HFiP) additives with electron deficient center Al – Calculated oxidation potential of solvents and validate with experiments

• FY 2013: – Synthesized a number of new additives including, Al(PFB), HFiP-grafted

phosphazene, PFB-grafted phosphazene – Continue testing of LNMO/graphite and doped LCP/graphite full cells in

electrolytes with additives at RT and 55 oC – Postmorten diagnostic for surface characterization and SEI chemistry

studies – Computational studies of new additives and interactions with electrodes

5

Approach/Strategy

• Develop new additives for carbonate based electrolytes – Develop additives with electron deficient center such as Al – Perfluorinate additives to enhance their effectiveness

• Understand and characterize capacity fading mechanism – Electrochemical methods: Characterize capacity fading, kinetics,

impedance changes w.r.t. rate and temperatures in half and full cells – Surface analysis: XPS, NMR, AFM

• Identify and/or develop stable high voltage cathodes as a testing vehicle – Focus on 4.7 V LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 (LNMO) spinel – Develop 4.8 V modified-LiCoPO4 (LCP)

• Computational effort – Understand oxidative stability of solvents in electrolytes – Understand reactive pathways of additives and electrolytes on cathodes – Develop ability to predict and design electrolyte components

Technical Accomplishments

• Designed and synthesized new additives • Electron deficient additives: HFiP, Al(HFiP), HFiP-grafted phosphazene • Perfluorinated additives: PFBP, Al(PFB), PFB-grafted phosphezene

• Evaluated perfluorinated additives • Higher degrees of fluorination of additives such as PFBP resulted in

better cycling performance. • Analyzed surface of graphite anode and LNMO cathode

• XPS surface analysis revealed the presence of fluorinated alkyl substructure on cathode.

• Evaluated cycling performance of LNMO/graphite full cells • Identified that a combination of HFiP and A-1 additives can reduce

capacity fading at 55 oC. • Evaluated cycling performance of Fe doped LCP (LCFP)/Li half cells

• LCFP cycled well at RT but faded at 55 oC in baseline electrolyte.

Technical Accomplishments - continued

• Computational: Calculated Oxidative stability of Electrolyte and Additives • Oxidation potentials of solvents calculated using DFT would be

lowered by the presence of anions and were in agreement with experiments.

• Calculated oxidation potentials of major solvents including carbonates, sulfones, alkylphosphates with anions BF4

-, PF6-, FSI,

TFSI, DCTA, DFOB, ClO4-.

• Calculated oxidation potentials of additives including HFiP and HFiP/BF4

- cluster. As expected, BF4- lowers the oxidation potential

of HFiP significantly.

Performance of Perfluorinated Additive LiPFB

0.99

0.992

0.994

0.996

0.998

1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Baseline: 1.2 M LiPF6 in EC/EMC (30:70)

Baseline + 5 mM PFBPBaseline + 10 mM AFAC

Cycle Number ANL LMNO/GR Full Cells

• Test cells: LNMO/A12 (graphite) at RT • Electrolytes: 1.2 M LiPF6 in EC:EMC (3:7) with Al(HFiP) and

LiPFB (shown as PBFP* in the above figure) and without. • The electrolyte with LiPFB showed much improved cycle life for

LNMO/A12 over the electrolyte without additives.

* All LNMO and A12 electrodes were provided by ANL.

Cresce, Xu

* PFBP identity was re-characterized and discussed in the next slide.

PFBP Identity

• Initially thought to be PFBP • Actually an intermediate lithium alkoxide salt • Bulky fluorinated tert-butyl groups prevented full

esterification of phosphorus center • Other additives being re-characterized • Scale-up of Li perfluorotert-butoxide (LiPFB) by ANL

ongoing Cresce, Xu

Surface Analysis with HR-XPS

The fate of phosphate in electrolyte • Phosphate ends up on cathode and anode • Fluorinated alkyls substructure on cathode

O

PO O

O

F3C CF3

CF3

CF3

F3C

F3C

HR-XPS conducted on both cathode and anode cycled in baseline and HFiP-containing electrolytes • P 2p absent in control samples • P2p on test samples

• 5~10 X more on cathode than anode • C1s for CF3 only found on cathode

-20

0

20

40

60

80

126128130132134136138140142

Anode in Baseline(1.0 m LiBF

4/EC/EMC)

Cathode in Baseline(1.0 m LiBF

4/EC/EMC)

Anode in Baseline with 5 mM HFiPCathode in Baseline with 5 mM HFiP

P 2p Binding Energy/eV

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

275280285290295300305

Anode in Baseline (1.0 m LiBF4/EC/EMC)

Cathode in Baseline (1.0 m LiBF4/EC/EMC)

Anode in Baseline with 5 mM HFiPCathode in Baseline with 5 mM HFiP

C1s Binding Enenrgy

-CF3

-C(O)-O-Li+

Cresce, Xu

New Additives Synthesized

O

PO O

O

F3C

F3C

F3C CF3

CF3

CF3

O

PO O

O

F3C

F3C

F3C CF3

CF3

CF3

O

PO O

O

F3C

CF3

CF3

CF3

F3C CF3

CF3

CF3

CF3

O

AlO O

F3C CF3

F3C

CF3 CF3

CF3

O

AlO O

F3C CF3

F3C

CF3 CF3

CF3

O

AlO O

F3C CF3

F3C

CF3 CF3

CF3

O

AlO O

F3C

F3C

CF3CF3F3C

CF3

CF3

F3C CF3

O

AlO O

F3C

F3C

CF3CF3F3C

CF3

CF3

F3C CF3O

AlO O

F3C CF3

F3C

CF3 CF3

CF3

N

PN

P

NP

O

O

O

O

O O

CF3F3C

CF3

F3C

F3C

CF3

CF3

CF3

CF3F3C

CF3

CF3

F3CCF3

F3C

CF3

CF3

F3C

HFiP

PFBP

Al(HFiP)

Al(PFB)

HFiP-grafted Phosphazene

PFB-grafted Phosphazene Cresce, Xu

Capacity Improvement – Perfluorinated Additives

• Cells: LNMO/A12 (graphite) in baseline electrolyte with additives. • Comparing to the partially fluorinated counterparts, Al(PFB) and PFB-grafted phosphezene were shown to improve the capacity utilization at RT.

Cresce, Xu

* All LNMO and A12 electrodes were provided by ANL.

LNMO/Graphite at Room Temperature and 55 oC

• dQ/dV vs. V plots at C/10, C/5 and C/3 rates at RT and 55 oC.

• Test Cell: LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 (LNMO)/Graphite (A12)

• Baseline electrolyte: 1.2 M LiPF6 in EC:EMC (3:7)

• At 55 oC, the cell capacity was reduced. the cell impedance was increased.

• Cycling at elevated temperatures is a challenge.

Blue: RT Red: 55 oC

Additives in LNMO/Graphite at 55 oC

• dQ/dV vs. V plots at 1 C rate at 55 oC.

• Test Cell: LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 (LNMO)/Graphite

• Electrolyte: 1.2 M LiPF6 in EC:EMC (3:7) with and without additives.

• HFiP + A-1 led to faster kinetics and better performance for the cell.

55 oC, 1 C Rate

Impact of Additives in LNMO/Graphite at 55 oC

• At 55 oC, either HFiP or A-1 additive alone couldn’t prevent the cell from losing capacity.

• A combination of HFiP and A-1 significantly improved the capacity retention at 55 oC.

Baseline: 1.2 M LiPF6 in EC:EMC (3:7)

Stabilized LCP/Li at Room Temperature and 55 oC

• Test cells: Fe doped LiCoPO4 (LCFP)/Li • Cycled between 3.5 and 4.95 V in 1.2 M LiPF6 in EC:EMC(3:7) • LCFP cycled well at RT in baseline electrolyte. • The capacity of LCFP faded gradually at 55 oC in the baseline

electrolyte suggesting thermally promoted reactions occurred between LCFP and the electrolyte.

RT

55 oC

Overview of Computational Studies

SEI : Li2EDC EC:DMC(3:7)/LiPF6

SEI

Interfacial structure and the associated interfacial resistance at the SEI – electrolyte interface

Structure and transport in bulk electrolytes and SEI components with a focus of Li+ competitive solvation in mixed solvents.

Investigating the structure and transport at SEI-electrolyte interface and SEI model compounds

Battery picture from Kang Xu

Oxidative stability and decomposition reactions of electrolytes

Major Focus within ABR Program Explore major classes of electrolytes: electrolyte additives ; carbonates; linear and cyclic sulfones (TMS, EMS); alkyl phosphates; solvents with anions : BF4

-, PF6-, FSI,

TFSI, DCTA, DFOB,ClO4-

Focus on the influence of salt on the solvent and additive oxidative potential and condensed phase effects. Xing, L.; Borodin, O. PCCP, 2012, 14, 12838 Borodin, O.; Jow. T. R. ECS Trans. 2013 (in press) Borodin, O.; Behl.; Jow, T. R. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013 (in press)

Conductivity of Li2EDC (∆E=64-84 kJ/mol) from Borodin, O.; Zhuang, G.V.; Ross, P.; Xu, K. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013 (in press)

CoPO4

Solvent-Anion Oxidation Stability

H or F transfer ε=1 ε=4.2 ε=20.5

DMC/BF4- yes 4.14 5.79 6.21, 5.92a

EC/BF4- yes 4.55 5.95 6.07 (6.39, 6.21)

EC2/BF4- yes 5.17 6.38 (6.46, 6.30)

EC3/BF4- yes 6.55, 6.37

EC/LiBF4 (v1) yes 8.74 6.64 EC/LiBF4 (v2) yes 8.46 6.82

EC2/LiBF4 no (7.51, 7.31) EC2/LiBF4 yes (6.72, 6.60) FEC/BF4

- yes 4.93 6.31 6.62 VC/BF4

- no 4.17 5.16 5.46, 5.47 DMC/PF6

- yes 4.56 6.12 6.51, 6.29 EMC/PF6

- yes (4.55, 4.44) (6.10,5.91) (6.50,6.31)

EC/PF6- yes 4.94, 4.71, 6.27 6.57, 6.37

EC4/PF6- yes (6.47, 6.53)

EC3/LiPF6 yes 6.94 (6.78) PC/BF4

- yes 4.57 6.25 PC/PF6- yes 4.84, 4.63 6.46,6.29

FEC/PF6- yes 5.16 6.78, 6.48a

EMS/BF4- no 5.31 6.41 6.62

TMS/PF6- (a) no 5.44 6.36 6.54

TMS/PF6- (b) no 5.48 6.35 6.49

EMS/PF6- no 5.46 6.47 6.66

TMP/BF4- (a) no (6.47,6.45)

TMP/BF4- (b) no (6.68)

TMP/PF6- no 5.07 6.62

EC/DFOB- (a) No 6.03, 5.92 EC/DFOB- (b) No 6.08, 5.94

Oxidation potential (adiabatic energy) of solvent/anion complexes from DFT calculations from the M05-2X/cc-pvTz and M05-2X/6-31+G** calculations denoted in parentheses. Borodin, O.; Behl.; Jow, T. R. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013 (in press)

oxidation

oxidation

oxidation

oxidation

oxidation

Oxidation of the EC4/BF4 Cluster

The BF4- assisted H transfer from one EC to another was observed during oxidation.

Oxidation potential for the cluster was significantly lower than the isolated EC oxidation potential of 7-7.2 eV calculated using PCM (ε=20)

Borodin, O.; Behl.; Jow, T. R. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013 (in press)

Oxidation Stability of Additives

E (V) G (V) PO(OCH3)3 (TMP) 6.8 6.9 PO(OCF3)3

(f-TMP) 8.4 8.3 PO(OCH(CF3)2)3 (HFiP) 8.1 B(OCH(CF3)2)3 (HFiB) 8.6 8.5 Al(OCH(CF3)2)3 (HFiAl) 8.0 8.0 B(OCH(CF3)2)3/BF4

- (HFiB/BF4

-) 7.0 6.9

Oxidation potential (adiabatic energy E and free energy G) vs. Li+/Li calculated using M05-2X/6-31+G** level with PCM(e=23)

Optimized geometry of HFiB/BF4- complex before and after oxidation. From M05-2X/6-31+G** calculations with PCM(ε=23)

oxidation

Fluorination of trimethyl phosphate PO(OCH3)3 → PO(OCF3)3 increases its intrinsic oxidation potential by 1.8 V. HFiP and HFiAl additives have 0.3-0.4 V lower intrinsic oxidative stability compared to f-TMP, while HFiB has the highest oxidative stability of 8.6 V among additives. Presence of fluorinated anions such as BF4

- significantly decreases additive oxidative stability, for example, HFiB/BF4

- oxidative stability is 1.6 V lower than that of HFiB due to spontaneous fluorine transfer from BF4- to HFiB

and B-O bond cleavage as shown in Figure above.

• ANL – Gregory Krumdick: For scaling up ARL developed HFiP and PFBP additives.

• ANL – Bryant Polzin: Providing high voltage and high energy electrodes and A12 graphite electrodes.

• ANL – Javier Bareno Garcia-Ontiveros, Ira Bloom: Discussion on Post Test Facility.

• ANL – Zhengcheng John Zhang: Information exchange and discussion.

• ANL – Anthony Burrell, Dennis Dees, Khalil Amine: Coordination and discussion.

• LBNL – Michel Foure, Guoying Chen, Vincent Battaglia: Information exchange and discussion.

• U. of Rhode Island – Brett Lucht: Information exchange and discussion.

Collaboration/Coordination

Future Work

• Continue testing of new additives or combination of additives in baseline electrolyte in LNMO/graphite full cells at elevated temperatures.

• Understand the capacity fading mechanism at elevated temperatures through more detail electrochemical methods and surface characterization analysis.

• Perform computational screening of redox stability and understand decomposition reactions of the electrolyte with electrode materials using DFT calculations.

• Continue to develop and collaborate with cathode materials developers for developing more stabilized high voltage cathode materials.

23

Summary

• Perfluorinated additives including PFBP and Al(PFB) showed much improved cycle life compared to the partially fluorinated counterparts in LNMO/graphite system at RT.

• Cycling of LNMO/graphite at 55 oC is a challenge. The capacity retention of LNMO/graphite system was greatly improved in the electrolyte containing a combination of HFiP and A-1 over that containing HFiP or A-1 alone.

• LCFP/Li half cell could be cycled well in baseline electrolyte at RT but showed gradual capacity fading at 55 oC.

• Oxidation potentials of solvents including additives calculated using DFT would be lowered by the presence of anions and were in agreement with experiments. EC/PF6

- has higher oxidation stability than EC/BF4

-.

DOE ABR Program • Peter Faguy, Tien Duong, David Howell

National Labs • ANL: Drs. Amine, Abraham, Zhang, Wu, and Lu • BNL: Dr. X. Yang

NRL • Drs. Michelle Johannes, Khang Hoang

U. of Maryland • Dr. Karen Gaskell

Acknowledgements