View
238
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
1/20
Table 12. Health Agencies Where Immunization was administered
Health Agencies Frequency Percentage
Barangay Health Center 37 90.24%
Private Clinic 1 2.44%
Hospital 3 7.32%
Total 41 100%
90.24%
2.44%7.32%
Figure 12. Health Agencies Where
Immunization was Administered
Barangay Health Center
Private Clinic
Hospital
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
2/20
Table 13. Nutritional Status
Status Frequency Percentage
Safe (normal) 72 75.79%
INTERMIDIATE (Below Normal) 17 17.89%
DANGER (Above normal and Very BelowNormal)
6 6.32%
Total 95 100%
75.79%
17.89%
6.32%
Figure 13. Nutritional Status
SAFE (normal)
INTERMIDIATE (Below Normal)
Danger (Above normal and Very
Below Normal)
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
3/20
Table 14. Milk Introduced to Children at Age 0-2 Year Old
Milk Frequency Percentage
Breast Milk 8 19.51%
Commercial Milk 2 4.88%
Mixed Feeding 31 75.61%
Total 41 100%
75.61%
19.51%
4.88%
Figure 14. Milk Introduced to Children at Age
0-2 Year Old
Mixed Feeding
BreastMilk
CommercialMilk
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
4/20
Table 15. Food Given to Children aged 0-2 Years Old
Food Frequency Percentage
Rice 30 23.81%
Meat 24 19.05%
Fruits 22 17.46%
Fish 24 19.05%
Vegetables 26 20.63%
Total 126 100%
23.81%
20.63%
19.05%
19.05%
17.46%
Figure 15. Food Given to Children 0-2 Years
Old
Rice
Vegetables
Fish
Meat
Friuts
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
5/20
Table 16. Food Given to Children aged 3-6 Years Old
Food Frequency Percentage
Rice 49 19.07%
Meat 44 17.12%
Fruits 39 15.18%
Fish 44 17.12%
Vegetables 40 15.56%
Milk 41 15.95%
Total 257 100%
19.07%
17.12%
17.12%
15.95%
15.56%
15.18%
Rice
Meat
Fish
Milk
Vegetables
Fruits
0.00% 5. 00% 10.00% 15.00% 20. 00% 25.00%
Figure 16. Food Given to Children aged 3-5
Years Old
Figure 16.Food Given to
Children aged 3-5 Years Old
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
6/20
Table 17. Vitamin A Given to Children aged 12-59 months
Response Frequency Percentage
Yes 56 96.55%
No 2
Total 58 100%
96.55%
3.45%
Figure 17. Vitamin A Given to Children aged
12-59 months
Yes
No
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
7/20
Table 18. Type of Salt Used
Type Frequency Percentage
Ordinary Salt 24 25.81%
Iodized Salt 69 74.19
Total 93 100%
74.19%
25.81%
Figure 18. Type of Salt Used
Iodized Salt
Ordinary Salt
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
8/20
Table 19. Number of Months Pregnant
Months Frequency Percentage
1-3
4-6
7-9 1 100%
Total 1 100%
100%
Figure 19. Number of Months Pregnant
7-9 mohs Pregnant
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
9/20
Table 20. Number Pre-natal Check-ups
Number of Check-ups Frequency Percentage
Once 0 0%
Twice 0 0%
Thrice 1 100%
Total 1 100%
100%
0%0%
Figure 20. Number Pre-natal Check-ups
Thrice
Twice
Once
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
10/20
Table 21. Number of Tetanus Toxoid Received
Tetanus Toxoid Received Frequency Percentage
1 0 0%
2 0 0%
3 0 0%
4 1 100%
None 0
Total 1 100%
100%
Figure 21. Number of Tetanus Toxoid
Received
1
2
3
4
None
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
11/20
Table 22. Place of pre-natal Check-up
Places Frequency Percentage
Barangay Health Center 0 0%
Birth Attendant 0 0%
Private Hospital/Clinic 1 100%
Others (specify) 0 0%
Total 1 100%
100%
Figure 22. Place of Pre-natal Check-up
Private Hospital/Clinic
Barangay Health Center
BirthAttendant
Others (specify)
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
12/20
Table 27. Status of Drinking Water
Status Frequency Percentage
SAFE (COWD Faucet within the House,
Commercial Water)133 93.01%
INTERMEDIATE (communal faucet) 10 6.99%
DANGER (artesian well, develop spring) 0 0%
Total 143 100%
93.01%
6.99%
0%
Figure 27. Statusnof Drinking Water
SAFE (COWD Faucet within the
house, Commercial Water
INTERMIDIATE (communal
faucet)
DANGER (artesian well, develop
spring)
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
13/20
Table 28. Presence of Toilet
Presence Frequency Percentage
Yes 134 93.71%
No 9
Total 143 100%
93.71%
6.29%
Figure 28. Presence of Toilet
Yes
No
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
14/20
Table 29. Types of Toilet Used
Types of Toilet Frequency Percentage
Flush 41 30.60%
Water Sealed 92 68.66%
Unsanitary pit privy 1 .74%
Total 134 100%
68.66%
30.60%
0.74%
Figure 29. Types of Toilet Used
Water Sealed
Flush
Unsanitary pit privy
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
15/20
Table 30. Status of Toilet
Status Frequency Percentage
SAFE ( Flush, Water Sealed) 133 93.01%
DANGER (Unsanitary pit privy, No Toilet) 10 6.99%
Total 143 100%
93.01%
6.99%
Figure 30. Status of Toilet
SAFE (Flush, Water Sealed)
DANGER (Unsanitary pit
privy, No Toilet)
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
16/20
Table 31. Methods Used in Garbage Disposal
Methods Of Garbage Disposal Frequency Percentage
Regular Garbage Collection 118 82.52%
No Methods Used 11 7.68%
Using Plastic Bags 5 3.50%
Compost pit 4 2.80%
Using Sacs 3 2.10%
Throwing Anywhere 1 .70%
Garbage Can without Cover 1 .70%
Total 143 100%
82.52%
7.68%
3.50%
2.80%
2.10%
0.70%
0.70%
Regular Garbage Collection
NoMethods Used
Using plastic Bags
Compost pit
Using Sacs
ThrowingAnywhere
Garbage Can Without Cover
0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%
Figure 31. Methods Used in Garbage Disposal
Figure 31.Methods Used in
Garbage Disposal
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
17/20
Table 32. Status of Garbage Disposal
Status Frequency Percentage
SAFE (garbage can w/ cover, regular garbage
collection)120 83.92%
INTERMEDIATE (garbage can w/out cover,
sacks, plastic bags, compost pit)12 8.39%
DANGER (throw anywhere, no methods used 11 7.69%
TOTAL 143 100%
83.92%
8.39%
7.69%
Table 32. Status of Garbage Disposal
SAFE (Garbage can w/
cover, regular garbage
collection)
INTERMEDIATE (garbage can
w/out cover, sacks, plastic
bags, compost pit)
DANGER (throw anywhere, no
mehtods used)
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
18/20
Table 33. Status of Drainage Used
Status Frequency Percentage
SAFE (closed drainage) 17 11.89%
INTERMEDIATE (Open Drainage) 90 62.94%
DANGER ( No Drainage) 36 25.17%
Total 143 100%
62.94%
25.17%
11.89%
Figure 33. Status of Drainage Used
INTERMEDIATE (Open Drainage)
DANGER (No Drainage)
SAFE (Closed Drainage)
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
19/20
Table 34. Status of Surroundings
Status Frequency Percentage
INTERMEDIATE (MACKS-P only, DOHherbal plants only, Incomplete MACKS-P
herbal plants
79 55.24%
DANGER (No MACKS-P and DOH HerbalPlants
64 44.26%
Total 143 100%
55.24%
44.26%
Figure 34. Status of Sorroundings
INTERMEDIATE (MACKS-P
only, DOH herbal plants
only, incompleteMACKS-P and
Herbal Plants
DANGER (NoMACKS-P and DOH
herbarl plants
8/9/2019 Graphs Chn
20/20
Table 35. Status of Family Health Insurance
Status Frequency Percentage
SAFE (Any family member having a health
insurance)103 72.03%
INTERMEDIATE ( Planning to get a health
insurance)29 20.28%
DANGER ( No plan to get health insurance) 11 7.69%
Total 143 100%
72.03%
20.28%
7.69%
Figure 35. Status of Family Health Insurance
SAFE (Any family member
having a health insurance)
INTERMEDIATE (Planning to get
a health Insurance)
DANGER (No plan to get health
insurance)
Recommended