View
214
Download
0
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
INDICATORS, MAXIMIZING REVENUE] GB540: Economics for Global Decision Makers Try L. Muller A quick look at some of the acute effects that economic indicators have on CBRE and its position in the commercial real-estate market with a subsequent outline of how to maximize profits given the economic factors. January 15
Citation preview
2010
January 15 GB540: Economics for Global Decision Makers Try L. Muller
[CBRE: RESPONDING TO ECONOMIC
INDICATORS, MAXIMIZING REVENUE] A quick look at some of the acute effects that economic indicators have on CBRE and its position in the commercial real-estate market with a subsequent outline of how to maximize profits given the economic factors.
CBRE: Addressing Economic Indicators
2
Corporate Profits
Corporate profits for the commercial real estate industry are a great indicator of
economic health because it is procyclical and coincidental— providing an up-to-date
snapshot of the relationship between business and the economy. Profits and return on
investment greatly depend on the risk taking of the corporation. Thus, when business
conditions are favorable, big corporations like CB Richard Ellis (CBRE) become
optimistic about future plans and how to expand operations and the workforce.
Conversely, depressed corporate profits will cause pessimism and the company will
contract its operations, employment initiatives, and investments. In Q4 of 2009 65% of
U.S. companies beat analysts’ expectations in regard to profit for the quarter (Aeppland
and Whitehouse, 2009). However, company earnings have actually fallen almost 25%
since 2008 (Aeppland and Whitehouse, 2009). Like CBRE, these corporate profits were
generated by companies who significantly cut cost to render these returns (Aeppland
and Whitehouse, 2009). These “empty” profits indicate that CBRE should still be
reluctant to reinvest these profits into additional business endeavors because there are
not substantial economic indicators to imply that there has been an improvement in the
market. If CBRE was to see these independent profits as a potential trend, it runs a
high risk of completely closing the margin between its operating income and operating
expenses.
Inflation/Deflation
The major issue is whether or not deflation will continue its current trend or will it level
out before over consumption— before prices are pushed back to inflation (Christensen,
CBRE: Addressing Economic Indicators
3
2009). Due to the potential for a slow economic recovery, coupled with a high rate of
unemployment, CBRE could eventually start to see some operational improvement in
the short to mid-term and less benefit in the long-term. CBRE will be able to increase
property sales and expand its employment as purchasing power and prices balance out
in the short to mid-term of this period of deflation. However, as the purchasing power
increases during sustained deflation, property may eventually begin to be consumed at
a higher rate than the output capacity of CBRE. Its capacity to create property and
provide its other services may be pushed beyond the optimum limits and the demand
for such commercial property services could begin to far exceed the company’s
capabilities. Competition for property pricing could cause CBRE to offer prices under
current profit margins just to hold on to its market position. The combination of demand
and price undercutting could eventually decrease output and profit in the long-term.
Unemployment
We have seen marginal improvements in the unemployment rate (9.5%) since
unemployment peaked in Q4 of 2009 (10%) (Knakal, 2009). CBRE should not expect to
see significant increases in the demand for office and industrial spaces with such a
small improvement in unemployment. The company needs to realize that it will continue
to lose value on its vacant properties since availability and vacancy rates will remain
high as long as there is a hiring freeze. CBRE will have to focus on long-term strategies
and short-term maintenance because unemployment is a lagging indicator that will not
render any short-term benefits since it will improve at a slower rate than the economy—
meaning not much short-term turnaround on vacancy and availability rates. Property
CBRE: Addressing Economic Indicators
4
values will continue to fall until consumer spending stimulates business investments in
capital— which should all be stimulated by a lowering rate of unemployment.
New Construction
There has been very limited new construction activity with vacancy rates jumping from
7% to 18% over the last two years (Widhalm, 2010). If businesses are not expanding
and not hiring then there is no job creation— property on the market cannot be
absorbed. Commercial property— especially business parks— are built on the basis of
speculative construction. The idea of CBRE putting property up for sale with the mere
potential of it selling in this market is almost unfathomable. The lack of new construction
is indicating to CBRE that it needs to follow suit and refrain from pursuing new
endeavors because it is hard to find occupancy and financing for speculative
construction right now. Also, the lack of new construction severely limits CBRE’s broker
deals since any new opportunities will have to be pushed back until economic
conditions allow for the market to be liquid.
Bank Credit
The Federal Reserve has found that commercial banks have ceased applying new
highly restrictive standards on many loan types (Associated Press, 2010). Unfortunately
this does not apply to commercial real-estate loans. Even though the banks are not
imposing new restrictions, the commercial real-estate market makes them very wary
because it is illiquid and it is driven by speculative construction (Associated Press,
2010). CBRE will continue to have stagnant operations and have to try to recycle its
income through some of its more sustainable endeavors in order to provide the
CBRE: Addressing Economic Indicators
5
company with some stability. The inability to obtain operating capital will increase the
rate of income loss while operating expenses will remain the same— closing the margin
even between the two even more. The market will have to be more liquid for CBRE to
actually be able to use external resources to increase activity.
Interest Rates
The Federal Reserve decided to hold interest rates at a mark near zero for the
beginning of this year (Associated Press, 2010). This shows that it is trying to facilitate
recovery and has long-term implication for CBRE. The Federal Reserve is trying to
stimulate consumption through extremely low-interest loans. This should mean that
CBRE may soon experience some increase in property sales and eventually see an
increase in property values as consumption begins to pick up.
Maximizing Revenue
The following is an outline of how CBRE can address the aforementioned economic
indicators in efforts to maximize revenue:
1. Cost-cutting
a. Cutting operating expenses worked for Q4 of 2009 and is a good strategy for
recession-proof sustenance.
i. Cut back internal costs
1. Limit extraneous spending beyond direct compensation
including the reduction of executive perks
2. Institute a hiring freeze and contract temporary work where
needed
ii. Cut back external costs
CBRE: Addressing Economic Indicators
6
1. Freeze all speculative endeavors and only engage in projects
with non-speculative parameters; preferably with partners
2. Attempt to share risk in all endeavors
3. This provides a stronger foundation by which to obtain
commercial loans from banks and help short-term cash flow
problems
4. Focus short and mid-term strategies on property management
services and broker deals
2. Short to mid-term strategy: Early hedge on deflation
a. Start to address strategies for filling vacant properties
i. Make selling prices and rents more negotiable
ii. Devote resources to research and sales; be more proactive about
finding potential occupants
iii. Continue to find partners with whom to combine capital resources to
pursue opportunities in the early stages of deflation before competition
picks back up
3. Lay out a long-term plan to move with the rate of deflation
i. Conduct a risk assessment
1. Global vs. domestic opportunities and their implications
2. Is there a need to eliminate operations in an unfavorable global
economy?
ii. Liquidity analysis
1. How liquid is the company on a global and domestic landscape?
2. Where are you seeing a higher return on assets
iii. SWOT analysis given the current economic situation
1. Perform this on a global level
2. There may be less threats and more opportunities globally
a. i.e. capitalize on China’s high property values and low
unemployment rate
CBRE: Addressing Economic Indicators
7
Associated Press. (2010).“Fed sees signs that credit crisis easing”. Retrieved from
MSNBC.com database:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35186153/#storyContinued
Aeppel, T., Whitehouse, M. (2009). “Cost Cuts Lift Profits but Hinder Economy”.
Retrieve from The Wall Street Journal:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125539122868481389.html
Chistensen, J. (2009). “Inflation Expectations and the Risk of Deflation”. Retrieved from
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco database:
http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2009/el2009-34.html
Knakal, R. (2009) “How Unemployment and Deflation Could Affect Commercial Real
Estate Values”. Retrieved from the Real Estate Channel database:
http://www.realestatechannel.com/us-markets/commercial-real-estate-1/robert-
knakal-massey-knakal-real-estate-commercial-real-estate-values-new-york-
commercial-real-estate-sales-2009-cap-rates-roi-calling-a-bottom-1022.php
Widhalm, S. (2010). “Commercial Construction Projects Slow with Economy”. Retrieved
from Reporter-Herald database:
http://www.reporterherald.com/news_story.asp?ID=26364
CBRE: Addressing Economic Indicators
8
Recommended