View
218
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Gambling5:C - 1(30)
Entertainment and Media: Markets and Economics
Casino Gambling
Gambling5:C - 2(30)
Casino Gambling The Market
Gross Revenue 2012: $37b – Churn: about $700b State/Local taxes: $8.6b Employment: 330,000+
Competition: Caesars+MGM 30% Top 5, (incl. Harrahs, etc.) 40% Local monopoly – national market shares are meaningless
The Product A Production Function? Casino Profitability Why Do People Gamble?
Gambling5:C - 3(30)
Casino Production Function
Output: Two or more Gambling profits Entertainment experience (Las Vegas) Food and drink
Inputs Fixed: Most of the cost structure, Ambient music Variable: Labor, drink, foodstuffs, supplies, small.
Economies of Scale? Certainly Economies of Scope? Unclear Technological Advance? Definitely
Gambling5:C - 4(30)
A Casino Production FunctionSubstitution of Inputs
Technological Advances:
Bill changers at slot machine stations
Automatic Card Shufflers at Poker and Blackjack Tables
All electronic, video card games
Gambling5:C - 5(30)
Labor Saving Technological Change in Poker
Gambling5:C - 6(30)
The Essential Element of Casino Profitability
House advantage Games are not “fair”
Expected winning is always negative, even when payout is proportional to true odds.
The “product” of this result is predictable via the Law of Large Numbers.
Gambling5:C - 7(30)
Casino Profitability – Certainty
The essential result: The Law of large numbers.
Event consists of two random outcomes YES and NO
Prob[YES occurs] =
Prob[NO occurs ] = 1- Example: Throw a die. True Prob(Face = 6) = 1/6.
Event is to be staged N times, independently
N1 = number of times YES occurs, P = N1/N
LLN: As N Prob[(P - ) > ] 0
no matter how small is.
The law states that if you run the experiment enough times, the proportion of “successes” in the runs of the experiment will eventually match the actual probability of success.
Gambling5:C - 8(30)
Interpreting the LLN
For any N, P will deviate from because of randomness.
As N gets larger, the difference will disappear
Proportion of Times 2,4,6,8,10 Occurs
I
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.0100 200 300 400 5000
P1I
Computer Simulation of a Roulette Wheel
Number of Spins
P
5.132
38
Gambling5:C - 9(30)
Casinos Use the LLN
Payout at any game setting in any repetition is unpredictable
Average payout over the long term, many thousands of repetitions is almost perfectly predictable.
Gambling5:C - 10(30)
American Roulette
Bet $1 on a number (not 0 or 00) If it comes up, win $35. If not, lose the $1 E[Win] = (-$1)(37/38) + (+$35)(1/38)
= -5.3 cents. Different combinations (all red, all odd, etc.) all
return -$.053 per $1 bet. Stay long enough and the wheel will always
take it all. (It will grind you down.) (A twist. Why not bet $1,000,000. Why do
casinos have “table limits?”)
18 Red numbers 18 Black numbers 2 Green numbers (0,00)
Gambling5:C - 11(30)
The Gambler’s Odds in Roulette
Gambling5:C - 12(30)
Gambling5:C - 13(30)
Pay Less than True Odds
Hand Payoff True Odds
Royal Flush 100 to 1 650,000 to 1
Straight Flush 50 to 1 70,000 to 1
Four of a Kind 20 to 1 4,000 to 1
Full house 7 to 1 700 to 1
Flush 5 to 1 500 to 1
Straight 4 to 1 250 to 1
Three of a kind 3 to 1 50 to 1
Two pair 2 to 1 20 to 1
One pair 1 to 1 2.5 to 1
Ace/King 1 to 1 1.2 to 1
Caribbean Stud, 5 Card Poker
1. You must get the hand
2. Dealer must get Ace/King or better
3. You must have a better hand than the dealer
Gambling5:C - 14(30)
Caribbean Stud Poker
Gambling5:C - 15(30)
The House Edge is 5.22%
It’s not that bad. It’s closer to 2.5% based on a simple betting strategy.
These are the returns to the player.
http://wizardofodds.com/caribbeanstud
Gambling5:C - 16(30)
Gambler’s Ruin
By dint of the LLN, a small, long term bettor eventually goes broke Assume house edge is 5% On an initial $1000, gambler leaves with $950. On returning to the table with the $950, the gambler leaves
with $902.50 After only two rounds, the house has gained 7.50% And so on…
A better strategy is to make one huge bet. The casino imposes table limits on all games.
Gambling5:C - 17(30)
The Gambler’s Ruin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roulette
Gambling5:C - 18(30)
Since Hamman founded the Dallas-based company in 1986, SCA has grown into the world's go-to insurer of stunts that give fans the opportunity to win piles of dough if they make a hole-in-one, kick a field goal or sink a half-court shot. SCA determines the odds for each contest and charges event sponsors a fee based on the probability of someone succeeding, prize value and number of contestants. If the contestants win, SCA pays them the full prize amount. If they don't, SCA pockets the premium. "The primary distinction between us and [traditional] insurance businesses is that they restore something economically when something bad happens," Hamman says. "When you put on a promotion, you're simply taking a position on the likelihood of an event occurring."
Gambling5:C - 19(30)
Information Asymmetry? Do gamblers know the true odds at any game?
Blissful ignorance
Bettors usually do not know the true odds.
Bets are always based on subjective probabilities which are usually too high in their favor. (Example, blackjack behavior)
Does the house know more than the gambler?The house relies on the law of large numbers and the house advantage. That is all they need to know.
Does it matter? Why does the gambler gamble?
Gambling5:C - 20(30)
The Business of Gambling
Casinos run millions of “experiments” every day. Payoffs and probabilities are unknown (except on slot
machines and roulette wheels) because players bet “strategically” and there are many types of games to choose from.
The aggregation of the millions of bets of all these types is almost perfectly predictable. The expected payoff to an entire casino is known with virtual certainty.
The uncertainty in the casino business relates to how many people come to the site.
Gambling5:C - 21(30)
Gambling Market
Gambling5:C - 22(30)
Thriving
Not Thriving
Are there differences that explain why thoroughbred racing as an industry is thriving and greyhound racing is declining?
Gambling5:C - 23(30)
Inevitable
Gambling5:C - 24(30)
Gambling5:C - 25(30)
After Regulatory Scrimmage
Gambling5:C - 26(30)
Gambling5:C - 27(30)
Amazingly Rapidly GrowingHugely Profitable
Gambling5:C - 28(30)
Gambling5:C - 29(30)
A Different Game. Play for Prizes.
Gambling5:C - 30(30)
Utility
Wealth
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
At low levels of exposure, consumers enjoy risk. They enjoy unfair games. The fun of winning offsets the negative value of the game.
Casino
The same consumer insures their car and home.
Why Do People Gamble?
Recommended