View
231
Download
1
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/2/2019 FSC PEFC Comparison
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fsc-pefc-comparison 1/9
International Winter Course
Auditors training as a CSR voluntary tool for SFMSan Vito (Belluno, Italy) – 27th February 2009
!" !#
Promuoviamo la gestionesostenibile delle foreste
www.pefc.org
www.fsc.org
!"#$% &'((
!
• 90 national certification schemes (source: FAO)
!!$
8/2/2019 FSC PEFC Comparison
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fsc-pefc-comparison 2/9
'
102.79 M ha in 81 Countries
(= 7% of the world’s productive forests)
10,472 COC in 81 Countries
Database: www.fsc-info.org
! $
Interest for PEFC
PEFCC members
submitted
officially recognised
!"
#$#%&&""
'() (*"
(('+))""
Australia 7 884 517
Austria 2 039 236
Belgium 261 664
Brazil 882 902
Canada 63 251 704
Canada - SFI 38 026 230
Chile 1 911 920
Czech Republic 1 883 149
Denmark 207 711
Finland 20 719 735
France 3 901 263
Germany 7 122 536
Italy 699 755
Luxembourg 26 202
Norway 7 537 102
Slovak Republic 1 199 648
Spain 1 084 828
Sweden 7 562 883
Switzerland 313 092
USA - ATFS 9 977 841
USA - SFI 20 711 908
4 countries(Canada,Finland, USA,Australia)= 160 M ha
81.2%
%&'( "&&)
$(
!
8/2/2019 FSC PEFC Comparison
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fsc-pefc-comparison 3/9
)
!!$
*!$ ! $+*
Both are based on:
• SFM standards
• FM certification +
COC certification -
> same approach
‘from forests to shops’
• logos (trademarks)
for products
labelling
,! *
!• FSC is a scheme developed for tropical forests
• In Europe forest are well managed under quite strictrules and on the basis of a long tradition: no needs todemonstrate what is already evident
• FSC certification is an unsustainable cost for the smallforest owners and an “unfair” competitive advantage for
the large ones
In 1998 a new ombrella scheme was created: thePan-European Forest Certification (PEFC) schemebased on C&I of the Pan-European Process
"
-
.!/
8/2/2019 FSC PEFC Comparison
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fsc-pefc-comparison 7/9
I
3 8 % &'((I:
-( :
A+
A+#A+7
77&+2+-$7
#2+7
-+22
A+#-
77&#-2,-$<+A5 +87
#223#-:7
7 -$"-./011/-$"-I('((*
3-$1('(('&
-$"-I(''((/:
#& ? ! ! !
Common “ombrella” SFM P&C
F i n l a n d
G e r m a n y
C h i l e
A u s t r i a
B e l g i u m
S p a i n
… Common “ombrella”SFM P&C
B
r a s i l
U K
G e r m a n y
N L
U S A
…
Accreditation bynational accr.
bodies
Accreditation byan Accr.Unit
created by FSC
Certificationbodies
Certificationbodies
($ !7 8
Several approaches, severalcomparison matrixes and analysis:
- CEPI, 2001; updated in 2004
- Proforest, 2002
- Several research reports and scientific publications:e.g. Cashore et al. 2002; Holvoet and Muys, 2003;…
- FCAG by WWF-WB (the Global Forest Alliance), 2006;updated in 2008
- CPET, 2008 (commissioned by UK Government)
!DD$$$--D
8/2/2019 FSC PEFC Comparison
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fsc-pefc-comparison 8/9
:!
:7
8
:!
:
?"&&)2+
• Review of forest certification schemes carried out by theCentral Point of Expertise on Timber - last update Nov. 2008
• Commissioned by the UK Government to establish whichforest certification schemes are able to deliver itsrequirements for legal and sustainable timber for GPPpolicies:
from April 1 2009 the policy will demand that all timber and wood-derived
products must be ‘from independently verifiable legal and sustainablesources or FLEGT-licensed timber’ (timber which only meets the legalitycriteria will be accepted in very special cases only)
• Methodology:
- 5 schemes assessed (CSA, FSC, MTCC, PEFC, SFI)
- based on scheme documentation + input from stakeholder consultation,each scheme invited to review the collected information and main findings,technical review panel of 4 independent experts
?"&&)3
;9;>
((88+
'' #
1'
*)
1'
I 2
6&'((G 7
<7
&2<(8)3(=-<+&=+&'=+:
&2+<5 27
Recommended