View
222
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
1/57
TechnologyAdvisoryCouncil
StatusofRecommendations
June29,2011
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
2/57
FCCActionsonTACRecommendations
FCCtookimmediateactiononfourrecommendations:
(Jointly)MunicipalRacetotheTopProgram(#1);BestPractices/TechnologyOutreachtoState&LocalGovernments(#4)
FCCcitedtheTACrecommendationsinAprilNOIonBroadbandAccelerationandiscollectingdataonbestpractices
Chairmandirectedstaff(followingdatacollection)todeveloptimelineforBroadbandAccelerationRoadshow andBroadbandCityUSAaward
BroadbandInfrastructureExecutiveOrder(#2)
FCCstaffmetwithWhiteHouseofficialswithrequestforExec.Order
WhiteHouseisworkingwithFCCinputonpossibleExec.Order
PromoteSmallCellDeployment(#8)
FCCstaffhavebegunseriesofmeetingswithGSAtowardsapossiblefallworkshoponsmallcelldeploymentsingovernmentbuildings
FCCwillreportonprogressatSeptembermeeting
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
3/57
FCCActionsonTACRecommendations
FCCiswaitingonfurtheranalysisonfourrecommendations:
AdvocacyforRapidTowerSiting(#3)
Chairmandirectedstafftocollectandanalyzedataon shotclockeffectivenessinAprilBroadbandAccelerationNOI
StaffwillgiverecommendationtoChairman&CommissionersonresponsetoTACRec.#3afterevaluatingdata
ModelanOnlineDeploymentCoordinationSystem(#5)
FCChasinitiatedoutreachwithstakeholderstodetermine demand
formodelandpossibledesignandfunctionality NewMetricstoMeasureBroadbandNetworkQuality(#6)
TACWorkingGrouphaspreparedaninitialanalysisandrecommendsaworkshop
HighlightStrandedPSTNInvestments(#7)
TACWorkingGrouphaspreparedaninitialanalysisandrecommendsaworkshop
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
4/57
TechnicalAdvisoryCouncilCriticalLegacyTransitionWorkingGroup(CLTWG)
June29,2011
Washington,DC
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
5/57
CLTWG
MeetingAgenda
Whatweaddressed
Workinggroupmembers
Workproductstatus
Reportsummariesandrecommendations
TACdiscussion
Nextsteps
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
6/57
CLTWG
WhattheCriticalLegacyTransitionWorkingGroup
Addressed
TransitionfromthePSTNtoanallIPNetworkandfuture
technologies
NewMetricsforBroadbandQuality
QuantifyingthesizeofthePSTNtransition(Carrierstrandedassets)
Nationalcompetitivenessandbenchmarking
AfterthePSTN:Noncarrierstrandeddevices
Regulatoryimpactsandchangesrequiredforthetransition
Economicimpactsofthetransition
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
7/57
CLTWG
ShahidAhmed Accenture
NomiBergman BrightHouse
Networks LynnClaudy NationalAssociationof
Broadcasters
AdamDrobot (CoChair) 2M
Companies
TomEvslin Vermont
TelecommunicationsAuthority
Lisa
Gelb
FCC RussGyurek Cisco
GregLapin AmericanRadioRelay
League(ARRL)
Christopher
Lewis
FCC JackNasielski Qualcomm
RobertoPadovani Qualcomm
AndrewSetos Fox
DougSicker FCC
DavidTennenhouse (CoChair)New
VenturePartnersLLC
BudTribble Apple
RobertZitter HBO
WorkingGroupMembership
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
8/57
CLTWG
ProductStatus
ItemDraft Papers
Presentations
Summary
Recommendations
FutureEffort
NextSteps
1.
New
Metrics
for
BroadbandQuality Completed Completed Workshop
and
Refinement
2.Quantifying sizeof
thetransition
Completed Completed TimeLineforTransition
3.National
Competitiveness
InProgress No ReportatnextTACMtg.
4.AfterthePSTN:
Stranded Assets
Completed Completed WorkshopandRefinement
5.Regulatory Impacts
andchanges
Completed Completed Contributiontorulemaking
6.EconomicImpact Started No Report atnextTACMtg.
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
9/57
CLTWG
DraftRecommendations
and
Summaries
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
10/57
CLTWG
QuantifyingthePSTNLegacyTransition(DRAFT)
Problem/OpportunityAddressed:
AsthenumberofsubscribersonthePSTNfalls,thecostperremainingcustomerincreasesandtheoverall
burdenofmaintainingthePSTNbecomesuntenable.Afasttransitioncangeneratesignificanteconomic
activityandatthesametimelowerthetotalcost
Todaysdemandforcommunicationsismuchbroaderandrequiresmuchgreaterbandwidth
Cordcutting isalreadyhappeningorganicallyatimpressiverates.
1. WirelinetoWirelessdisplacement
2. IPbasednetworkreplacement/substitutionforfixedandmobilecommunications
KeyQuestions:
Whatisthesizeof thePSTNtransitionforServiceProviders? Howcanwefurtheracceleratethistransition?
Findings:
By2014,theUnitedStateswillhavefewerthan42Maccesslines
Accesslinelosseswerenearly6.6millionbetween2Q09and2Q10,adropof7.3%.
By2014USconsumerswillhave31.6millionVoIPlinesaccountingfor42.5%ofallU.S.accesslines.
Fixedlinescontinuetodecline;mobileisthepreferredchoiceforvoicecommunication.
Morethan25%ofU.S.consumersaged18orolderhavealreadygivenuptheirvoicelandlineforvoice
wirelessonlyservice.
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
11/57
CLTWG
QuantifyingthePSTNLegacyTransition(DRAFT)
Recommendations:
1. TheFCCshouldtakestepstopreparefortheinevitabletransitionfromthePSTN
2. TheFCCshouldtakestepstoexpeditethetransition,withatargetdateof2018
3. Provideincentivesforoperatorstoprovidebroadbandservices(thatcansupport
Voice)toruralareasandunderservedAmerica
4. FundPSAPssotheycanaccelerateintegrationwithIP/Packetnetwork(soE911
canworkwithIP)
5. Realignregulatoryrequirementstoemergingtechnologies
6. AssistBroadbandandOTTprovidersbyworkingwithSecurityandEmergency
AlarmsindustryassociationstopushforIPadoptione.g.NFPA72
7. BringtheNationalBroadbandPlaninalignmentwiththePSTNSunsettimetable
andassurethatadequatebroadband/mobilecapabilityisavailableeverywhere
thatthePSTNistoday
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
12/57
CLTWG
QuantifyingthePSTNLegacyTransition(DRAFT)
Cordcuttingishappeninginarapidpace,especiallytheyounger
segments.However,PSTNlinesarealsodroppingorganically.
AsofMay2010, 23%ofrespondentsinastudylivedinamobileonlyhousehold
Thesamestudyalsofoundthat37%ofadultsinthe1824and3034agegroupslivedina
mobileonlyhousehold
Source:NationalCenterforHealthStatistics
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
13/57
CLTWG
NewMetricsforBroadbandQuality(DRAFT)
Problem/OpportunityAddressed:
AsthenationtransitionstoNextGenerationNetworks,whatkindsofmetricsdo
weneed?
Findings:
1. Anexpandingsetofapplicationsforbroadbandnetworksrequires qualityand
reliabilitymetricswhichgobeyondsimplespeed
2. Muchworkisalreadyunderwayinthisarea
3. Metricsforrobustnessandreliabilityshouldtakeintoaccountthediversity
providedbyNextGenerationNetworks.
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
14/57
CLTWG
NewMetricsforBroadbandQuality(DRAFT)
Recommendations:
1. ThetechnicalmetricsofareplacementofthePSTNneedtogobeyondjusta
measurementofspeed
2. Continuetofocusawarenessontheissuesofqualityofserviceandnetwork
reliabilityforbroadbandservices,inadditiontospeed
3. Participationofindustryandconsumergroups,aswellasadditionalresearchand
innovationtodevelopnewmetricsforqualityandreliabilityshouldbe
encouraged
4. Theimportanceofthebuildoutofnextgenerationnetworksinsupportofpublic
safetyshouldbemadeclearatNational,StateandLocallevels
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
15/57
CLTWG
AfterthePSTN:Noncarrierstrandedassets(DRAFT)
Problem:Whatfunctions/servicesaredependentonthePSTN:
NoncarrierdeviceadaptionforIPwillhappenmuchfasterifmanufacturersknow
thereisadatecertainwhentheycannolongerdependonPSTN.Theschedulefor
transitionalsodependsonthepaceforbroadband/cellulardeployment.
Findings
1.Themajorityofthesecapabilitiesarealreadyaddressedbyreplacementtechnologies2.ImpactwillbehardestinruralAmerica
3.ClearadvantagestoacceleratingthesunsetofthePSTNby2018?
UniversalConnectivity E911
LinePower,BatteryBackup,RingVoltage DTMFforDialing,Transmission
DialTone E.164
IsochronousCommunicationsSignaling (ForFaxmachinesandotherdevices) CALEA
SwitchedCircuitFeatures(classXswitches) GETS
USF
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
16/57
CLTWG
AfterthePSTN:Noncarrierstrandedassets(DRAFT)
Recommendations:
1.Target2018astheendofthePSTN.
2.Developtimeline toensuresmoothtransitionwhichaddressesstrandedassets
3.Assurethatmobileand/orbroadbandreplacementsareavailableeverywherePSTN
iscurrentlyprovided.Theneedwillbegreatestinruralareas.
4.UpdatetheNationalBroadbandPlantosupportthePSTNtransition.
5.ChangeUSFfundingandspendingtosupportuniversalcoverageandothersocial
goals.
6.FurtherInvestigateemergencyserviceimpacttoassureasuitablereplacement
capability.7.Investigateincentiveprogramformediationdevicetobridgeolderdevicesw/oPSTN
ortowardspurchasingnewequipment(Consumerfocused)
CLT WG
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
17/57
CLTWG
RegulatoryimpactsandchangesrequiredforthePSTN
transition
(DRAFT) Problem/OpportunityAddressed:
Identifynecessaryregulatorychangestoaddressthechangeintechnologyfromthe
PSTN. Maintainorestablishtheleastrestrictiveregulatoryenvironmentthatstill
protectsthepublicinterest.
Findings
1.Someregulationsprotectbasicrightsofcitizens,suchas:Universalcommunicationsaccessforthedisabled,thepoor,andthoseinruralareas,Reliableaccesstoemergencyservices,Consumerprotection
2.SomeregulationsarePSTNspecificandshouldnotberetainedposttransition
3.Standardscreatedbyorganizationsthatgovernpublicsafetyalarmsystems(e.g.
NFPA)andprotectcommunicationsforindustriescriticaltothenations
infrastructure(e.g.FISO)mustbemodifiedtoaccountforregulatorychangesinthe
communicationssector.
CLT WG
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
18/57
CLTWG
RegulatoryimpactsandchangesrequiredforthePSTN
transition
(DRAFT)1. Universalaccesstoreliableemergencycommunicationsshouldcontinuetobeguaranteedby
regulation.
2. Accesstocommunicationsforpersonswithdisabilitiesshouldbe guaranteedbymodification
ofcurrentregulationstoacknowledgeubiquityofpersonalcomputers.
3. Consumerprotectionsagainstmisuseofthecommunicationssystem shouldcontinuetobe
regulatedwithmodificationstoacknowledgethedifferentlandscapeofcommunications.
4. FundingforPSAPsandUniversalService/LifelineAssistanceshouldbereformulatedtocoverall
aspectsofthefuturecommunicationssystem.
5. Regulationsthatsupporttheregulatedmonopolyaspect ofthePSTNshouldbeabandoned.
6. Twotiersofcommunications,servicesthatmeetregulationsandthosethatdonot,shouldbe
clearlyexplainedtotheconsumer,whocanthenmakeaninformed selection;regulations
mustmakeavailablehighlyreliablecommunicationsforcriticalindustries.
CLT WG
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
19/57
CLTWG
TACDiscussion
CLT WG
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
20/57
CLTWG
NextSteps
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
21/57
TechnologicalAdvisoryCouncil
IPv6WorkingGroup
29June2011
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
22/57
IPv6
DrivenbyexhaustofIPv4addressingscheme
Moves
from
32
bit
address
to
128
bit
address IPv6standard(RFC)published1998
LastblockofIPv4addressestoregionalregistryon2/11
FirstRegionalInternetRegistry(APNIC)depletedIPv4
4/11
DelayorabsenceofIPv6adoptionwillhaveimpacts
IncreaseuseofIPv4addresssharing
Securityandlegal
End
user
experience
22
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
23/57
IPv6TransitionEnvironment
Positives
ISPspreparedtosupportinitialIPv6transition
Awarenessisincreasingacrossindustryregardingthe
transitiontoIPv6
ConsumerelectronicandretailerawarenessIPv6increasing
WorldIPv6day,astresstest,largelysuccessful
Keyparticipantsincluded: contentproviders,largeMSOs andtelecom
companies(Facebook,Google,Yahoo,Comcast)
CornerCase issuesobserved,verysmall%ofparticipantshadissues
enablingInternetpropertieswithIPv6 Heightenedawareness
IPv6usageincreasedandinsomecasesremainedhigherpostWorldIPv6
Day
NextIPv6globaltestopportunitypossible1H2012
23
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
24/57
IPv6TransitionEnvironment
(continued) Negatives
More
than
simple
address
change Affectsfeatures,security,technology,administration
IPv6isnotbackwardscompatible
Notaneventbutanevolution
Requirements,technologyanduserexperience
Longtransitionexpectedalthoughsomeverticals maymovetowards
moreofatransition(potentialexamplemachinetomachine)
AswithIPv4,mostconsumersaregenerallyunawareoftheneedforIPv6
24
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
25/57
EvolutionPath
IPv6perceivedasnetexpense,producingexpedientdecisions
ISPswillusebothdualstacksANDcarriergradeNATs
CarrierGradeNATswillprovidesubstandardexperienceandnotsupport
criticalneedsofspecificverticals
VendorswillbalancebetweennonIPv6customerrequirementsand
neartermIPv6features
Objectivesnottotallyalignedbetweenvendors,enterprises,
ISPs,andconsumers
AdegreeofconcernregardingincreasedInternetcomplexity
DepletionofIPv4insomeregionswillhighlighttheneedforIPv6
Mayresultincompetitiveadvantage
25
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
26/57
Issues
USGv6,DOD,Industryandotherrequirementsdrivingvendordecisions
NosingledefinitionofIPv6requirementsatsamepointintime
Requirementsmayvarybasedonadopterandcontext(ISPversusenterprise)
Uncertainty
Vendors:whatgetsbuilt? When?
Users:manystillassessingimpactandinvestmentplan
Increasedriskperceivedinnewtechnologyandtransitioncomplexity
NewentrantsencumberedbylackofIPv4addressesduringtransition
Nostrategicplanencompassingtechnologyevolutionacross
sectors
26
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
27/57
TACConcern
AnincreasinglycomplexInternetwillimpact
innovation Unknownperiodoftransition
Internet
is
foundation
of
US
innovation Concernforlongtermcompetitiveness
Goalshouldbetominimizeperiodof
complexity
27
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
28/57
TACObjectives
Benchmarking
IdentifyIPv6preparednessandmetricsacrosskey
Internetsectors
Definetrackablemeasureofprogress
Outlinetechniquesthatcanbeusedtogather
measurabledatapoints
Makerecommendationstoimprovepathof
evolution
28
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
29/57
BenchmarkingMetrics
HighlevelmetricstobenchmarkIPv6transitionactivities
ConsumerElectronics
Network
Enduser
Application
Content
Services
TrafficLevels(IPv4vs.IPv6)
Thereisarelationshipbetweenthemetrics
Delaysorgapsinonearecouldhaveanoverallimpactto
IPv6transition
29
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
30/57
ConsumerElectronics
HomeorSOHOroutersupportforIPv6
PercentofdevicessupportIPv6 Numberofdevicessoldordeployed
InpremisedevicesupportforIPv6
InternetenabledTVs,tablets,gameconsoles
PercentofdevicesthatsupportIPv6
Numberofdevicessoldordeployed
OperatingsystemsupportforIPv6
PercentpenetrationperOS
30
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
31/57
Network
IPv6supportbyserviceprovider
IPv6supportbytypeofprovider Broadband
Wireless
Tier1
NumberofASNs thatadvertisesupportfor
IPv6
CategorizationofimpedimentstoIPv6
adoption31
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
32/57
EndUser
SupportforIPv6byenduser
Byserviceprovider Bytypeofservice
Consumerelectronicscapabilitiesinthepremise
Intersectionoftheseattributeswilldetermine
effectivesupportforIPv6
32
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
33/57
Applications
Supportbyapplicationtype
Browser,Email,others Percentsupportbycategory
Percentsupportbypopularity
Intersectswithtraffictypes
SupportforIPv6inapplicationswillplayinto
traffictypes
33
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
34/57
ContentandServices
SupportforcontentandservicesoverIPv6
Government Educational
Commercial
Notforprofit
Percentofcontentandservicesupporting
IPv6
by
category Percentoftrafficthateachcategory
representsforalltraffic
34
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
35/57
TrafficLevels
AggregateglobalandnationalInternettraffic
volumes IPv4vs.IPv6
IPv6total
Perprovidertrafficlevels
35
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
36/57
PotentialRecommendations
GovernmenttobeacatalystfortheIPv6transition
SetdatebywhenallgovernmentInternetpropertiesmustsupportIPv6(September2012?)
EnsureIPv6isrequiredbyallgovernmentvendorsandcontractors
EstablishnationalobjectivesforIPv6transitionacrosssectors
Settimelinesforgovernmentandindustryobjectives
DevelopbenchmarkinginformationsupportingtheIPv6transition
Minimizethetransitionperiod
Increaseawarenessofobjectives/issues
Sharingofinformationtosupportdecisionmaking
Fostercollaborationamongkeystakeholders
Governmentpoliciestosupportobjectives/transition
Issues
similar
to
other
legacy
transition
issues
36
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
37/57
NextSteps
BenchmarkingTeam
Vetbenchmarkingmeasureswithkeyindustry
andgovernmentgroupsandfinalize
Identifyownerofongoingbenchmarking
activities
Recommendations/Guidelines
Agreewithkeygovernmentgroupsonleadversus
supportgroupsforpotentialrecommendationson
IPv6
37
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
38/57
TechnologicalAdvisoryCouncil
Sharing
Working
Group29June2011
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
39/57
Charter
ThepurposeoftheSharingWorkingGroupisto
identify
steps
the
FCC
might
take
to
promote
neartermprivateinvestmentandjobcreation
basedonsharingtechniques,includingsharing
ofspectrum,facilities,orothertechniquesas
theworkinggroupmayfindappropriate.
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
40/57
StatementofWork FocusTopics
SpectrumEfficiencyMetrics
ReceiverStandards
CommercialWirelessApplications
HybridSystems
EmergingTechnologyPromotion/
Deployment
AdditionalTopicstobeIdentifiedbythe
WorkingGroup
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
41/57
WorkingGroupMembers
PeterBloom
JohnChapin
RichardCurrier
BrianDaly
DickGreen DaleHatfield
AriJuels
GeoffreyMendenhall
DanReed
JesseRussell
PaulSteinberg
JohnLeibovitz
JulieKnapp
TomWheeler WalterJohnston
ChrisLewis
DennisRoberson
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
42/57
IdeasforConsideration
1. DevelopSpectrumEfficiencyMetrics
2. EncourageReceiverStandards
3. CreateSpectrumSharingTaxonomy
4. AccelerateSmallCellDeploymentsand
SpectrumSharing especiallyIndoors
5. RemoveApplicationFrictionPoints
Id #1 S t Effi i
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
43/57
Idea#1:SpectrumEfficiencyStatus LongerTermOpportunity
Problem
SpectrumefficienciesachievedbywirelesssystemsofalltypesmustimproveiftheNationistoaccommodaterapidlyincreasinglydemandandstimulatejobgrowth
Thereisnosinglemeasureofspectrumefficiencythatcanbeappliedacrossallservices
ProposedIdea
Metricscan(andhavebeen)developedthatallowefficiencycomparisonstobemadebetweensimilartypesofsystemswhichprovidesimilarservices.(e.g.,bps/Hz/km2 forpersonalcommunicationssystems)
Ourinitialtaxonomyofsimilarsystems:Broadcast,Personal
Communications,Pointtopointdirectional,Radar,andSatellite. Themetricsshouldstimulatetechnicalefficiency theinherent
efficiencyofthemodulationschemesetc.,andoperationalefficiency theefficienciesachievedthroughthepracticesofserviceproviders
andusers(e.g.,throughdynamicloading/sharing)
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
44/57
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
45/57
Idea#2 ReceiverStandards
Status
Longer
Term
OpportunityProblem
Receivershavebecomeoneofthecriticallimitingfactorinoptimizingandtherebyincreasingtheuseofthespectrum
Reducedavailabilityofspectruminturnreducestheopportunitytodeploynewwirelessapplicationtherebyreducingeconomicdeploymentopportunities
ProposedIdea Identifyallreceiverrelatedspectrumusagechallengesthrough
deliveryofastudy
InitiationaLivingDocument thatestablishesthebest
practicesforeverimprovingreceiverspecifications,particularlyinspectrumselectivity,sensitivityandlinearitywhileaddressingeconomicandformfactorfeasibility
Id #2 R i St d d
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
46/57
Idea#2 ReceiverStandardsProgress
Identifiedalistofthemostsignificantreceiverrelatedissuesthathaveoccurredoverthepasttwentyyearsorso
AnalyzingthelisttogleantheunderstandingthatcanbeobtainedthatisapplicabletorefiningourfutureeffortswithintheCommissiontoreducetheimpactofthisclassofproblems
EconomicImpact Actionshouldstimulatethecreationofhighpayingjobs
Researchanddevelopmentonreceiversmeetingtheeverimprovingspecifications
Deployment
resources
needed
for
replacement
of
out
dated
and
highly
inefficientreceiverequipment
Enhancedspectrumutilizationwillfreeupmorespectrumallowingnewwirelessapplicationtobemorerapidlydeployed
NextSteps
Proposedreceiverimpactstudyunderwaytodeterminethescaleoftheopportunities,thedepthofthechallengeandthetargetsforinitialactions
IntegratingIdeas2intoIdea1toformasystemslevelefficiencyview
ActionableProgressReporttobeprovidedatthenextTACmeeting
Id #3 S t Sh i T
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
47/57
Idea#3:SpectrumSharingTaxonomy
Status
Long
Term
Opportunity
Problem
Morespectrumsharingwillbeneededtomeetthe
AdministrationandFCCgoaloffinding500MHzforBroadband
Sharingofallocationstypicallyreflectsincrementaldecisions,notanoverallstrategy
ProposedIdea
Createasharingtaxonomy thatidentifiessuccessfulexamplesofsharingandproposescoexistence
opportunities
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
48/57
Idea #4: Encourage Small Cell Deployment
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
49/57
Idea#4:EncourageSmallCellDeploymentStatus NearTermOpportunity existingspectrum;Mid toLongerTerm
OpportunitywherenewspectrumdevelopmentisrequiredProblem
Howtoacceleratedeploymentoffast,reliableintegratednarrowband/
broadbandwirelesssolutions(e.g.Femtocells,PicoCells.NanoCells,WiFi,
DAS,etc.)tomeetthebreadthofdemandforbroadbandserviceswithinhigh
teledensity areasandtosupportnewapproachesofoffloadinghighuse
spectrum(e.g.WideAreaCellularNetworks)
Challengesincludesiting,interference,QoS,incentivestodeploynewsmallcellnetworksandthesharingofexisting /newbackhaulinfrastructure
ProposedIdeas
Exploremechanisms,workingwithfederalagencies,toexpeditesiting
requestswithinfederallandsandbuildings
Providespectrumassignment/allocationforcarriers,premiseowners,and/or
thirdpartyentitiestoinstallandoperateinbuildingnetworks,including
provider
agnostic infrastructure
Idea #4: Encourage Small Cell Deployment
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
50/57
Progress
Outreachtosomestakeholdergroups(e.g.,premisesowners,carriers,users)
Developmentofstrawman viewofpotentialbenefits,enablers,androadblocksto
informFCChostedworkshop
FCCstaffoutreachtoGSAregardingaccesstofederalsiting
EconomicImpact
Creationofalargenumberofhighpayingjobsfordesign,installation,and
operationof systems (e.g.inbuilding,inhightrafficvenues)
Over2millioncommercialbuildings>5kSqFtintheU.S.(~60millionworkers)
Createsamoreubiquitousmobilenetworkwithscalablebandwidth andcapability
(e.g.,improvedindoorlocationaccuracyandsmartgridenergymanagement
services)sufficienttoengenderanewrealmofapplicationdevelopment.
Next
Steps FollowupwithGSA/federalagenciestounderstanddeploymentissues
Definesiting issues/recommendationsassociatedwithvarioussmallcelloptions
ConveneforuminSeptembertoalignstakeholdergroupsaroundopportunity
andidentifyspecificactionsforconsiderationbyTACatnextmeeting
Idea#4:EncourageSmallCellDeployment
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
51/57
Idea #5 Reducing Application Friction Points
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
52/57
Idea#5 ReducingApplicationFrictionPointsProgress
Obtainingcurrentprocessesforqualifyingsystemlevelapplicationson
cellularcarriernetworks.
Identifiedspecificindustryandgovernmenttargetgroupstoassesstheir
specificfrictionpoints.
EconomicImpact ReductionofFrictionshouldengenderingInnovation,Economic
DevelopmentandsignificantJobCreation,aswellasimprovingservice
delivery
NextSteps
Convene actionorientedFCCSponsoredWorkshop(inconjunctionwith
SmallCellWorkshop)inSeptemberwiththefollowingconstituencies
involved:
o Wirelesscarriers(includingsatellite),governmentusers(national,state
andlocal),serviceproviders,energycompanies,healthcareproviders,
investors,wirelessentrepreneursandacademicsinthespace
Sharethecurrent(carrier)stateofapplicationdevelopment/certificationandgenerateApplicationChallengesandOpportunitiesthroughmeeting
MakespecificrecommendationsatthenextTACMeeting
Summary and Conclusions
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
53/57
SummaryandConclusions TheWorkingGroupmetonnumerousoccasionssince
thelastmeetingasafullgroupandasIdea basedsub
groupsrefiningandmakingprogressonthefiveIdeas
generatedpriortothelastTACmeetingultimately
refiningthefocustofourIdeas SpectrumEfficiency,
SpectrumSharing,SmallCellandFrictionReduction.
TheWorkingGroupmembersarenowlookingforward
tothefeedbackofthefullTACandtheFCCteamonthe
variousdeliverablescreatedforthefirsttwoIdeas
TheWorkingGroupisanxioustocompletetheactionsoutlinedabovetomovetheIdeastoactionsthatcreate
jobs,improvetheutilizationofournationsspectrum
resource
and
enhances
the
well
being
of
our
citizens
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
54/57
TechnologicalAdvisoryCouncil
BroadbandDeploymentWorking
Group
June29,2011
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
55/57
StateandLocalPermittingProcess
Problem Inconsistentstateandlocalmunicipalitypermittingprocessesandpolicies
resultinuncertainty,discouragingand/ordelayinginvestment.
ProposedIdea FCCsponsorededucationandcommunicationwithstateandlocal
municipalitiestoincentsupportforinvestmentanddeploymentof
broadband.
NextSteps Encouragecollaborationtoidentifytoolstoassistmunicipalitiesin
identificationandimplementationofbestpractices. Conveneworkshopstosensitizestateandlocalmunicipalitiesto the
positivebenefitofacceleration.
Identifyandpublishbestpracticesforpermitrequirementsandprocessing.
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
56/57
8/6/2019 FCC Technology Advisory Council - June 29, 2011
57/57
DefinitionofMiddleMileProvider*
Problem
Somepoleattachmentandfranchiseagreementsdonotallowmiddlemile,transportonlyproviderstoobtainfranchisesandusageofPole
AttachmentsandRightsofWayagreements. Highcostofmiddlemilebroadbandtransportinsomeareas.
TheUSAhasthelowestcostofInternetbandwidthintheworlduntilmiddlemilecostsareadded.
ProposedIdeas FCCshouldconsideranewdefinitionofacarrierneutral,middlemileproviderto
aidwithestablishingeasementsandrightsofwayanddeterminewhat(ifany)
obligationsapplytothisnewclassofprovider.
* ThistopicisunderdiscussionwithintheWorkingGroup
Recommended