View
220
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Expertiza: Rubric-Based Peer Expertiza: Rubric-Based Peer Assessment of Team ProjectsAssessment of Team Projects
Edward F. GehringerDept. of Computer Science
North Carolina State University
Supported by NSF DUE under a CCLI grantNCSU Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning
NCSU STEM InitiativeCenter for Advanced Computing and Communication
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Outline Expertiza Rationale Team Assignments Expertiza “Virtual” Demo Forthcoming Features Workshop
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Introduction Expertiza began as a peer-review system for co-
production of course resources. Building resources through electronic peer
review gets students working together to improve others’
learning experiences, helps them learn, by performing tasks that are similar
to real-world responsibilities, gives them experience in writing their ideas up for an
audience of their peers, allows each cohort to “stand on the shoulders” of
students in earlier classes.
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Homework, traditionally … For students to demonstrate mastery of
the subject. Every student does the same thing—
redundant effort. Work is graded and thrown away, never
benefiting anyone but the student who did it. In Expertiza, students (or teams) sign up
for different work Now the best work can be reused, to
help others learn.
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Major advantages Expertiza discourages plagiarism
Students are not doing the same work. Their work must go through multiple review
cycles Expertiza better utilizes scarce resources
Students do most of the reviewing. Instructor/TA spend less time grading.
With Expertiza, large classes are an advantage!
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Why team assignments? Teamwork mimics the work environment Teaming skills are important to success Teams can tackle larger projects,
which diminishes the effort of integration
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
How does Expertiza support teams? All team members have access to a
common submission area. Any member can revise the submission.
Individuals review teams. This simplifies reviewing, and provides for more reviews.
Teammates assess each other’s contribution to the team. This score can be factored into the student’s
grade.
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
“Virtual” demo Team formation
By instructor, from the user interface By instructor, by importing a file By students, by issuing invitations
Reviewing Feedback from author to reviewer Teammate review
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
The login screen
Let’s log in as an instructor …
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
The instructor’s homepage
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Setting up a wiki assignment
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Let’s create some teams …
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
In the beginning, there are no teams
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
But let’s create one …
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Team created; let’s add members
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
1st member is added; now for the 2nd …
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Team now has two members
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
“Virtual” demo Team formation
By instructor, from the user interface By instructor, by importing a file By students, by issuing invitations
Reviewing Feedback from author to reviewer Teammate review
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Importing teams
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Here’s the file that’ll be imported
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Here’s how we import it
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Now there are five teams …
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
“Virtual” demo Team formation
By instructor, from the user interface By instructor, by importing a file By students, by issuing invitations
Reviewing Feedback from author to reviewer Teammate review
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Students can create teams too …
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Click on this assignment, Team test 2
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Now, click on “Your team”
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
This user needs to set up a team
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Let’s create a team
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Invite another member to join …
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Invitation has been sent
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Now the invited user logs in
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
… and goes to Team test 2
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Then accepts the invitation
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
… and is placed on the team
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Advantages of various approaches Instructor-assigned teams
using class rank using demographics
Student-selected teams Forthcoming: Schedule-based team
formation
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
“Virtual” demo Team formation
By instructor, from the user interface By instructor, by importing a file By students, by issuing invitations
Reviewing Feedback from author to reviewer Teammate review
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Let’s review a wiki page
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Click on the assignment …
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
… then on “Others’ work”
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Choose a review
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Read the submitted wiki page
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Then fill out the review template
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Save and view the review
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu10/29/08 Gehringer: Expertiza: A Peer-Review System for Collaborative Learning, efg@ncsu.edu
After the Initial Review
Resubmission phase. 2–7 days to revise work in response to reviewer comments.
Final review. 3–7 days to make final comments and assign scores.
Metareview phase. Students review each other’s reviews.
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
“Virtual” demo Team formation
By instructor, from the user interface By instructor, by importing a file By students, by issuing invitations
Reviewing Feedback from author to reviewer Teammate review
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Now the reviewee logs in …
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
… and views the scores
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Click on “View” to expand review
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Notice the link down at the bottom
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Use it to give feedback to the reviewer
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Then the reviewer can view the feedback
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
“Virtual” demo Team formation
By instructor, from the user interface By instructor, by importing a file By students, by issuing invitations
Reviewing Feedback from author to reviewer Teammate review
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Review of teammates
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Answer these questions …
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Summary of feedback in Expertiza Reviews Feedback to author Teammate reviews Metareviews (x reviews y’s review of z) Surveys
All but surveys can influence the final grade
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Instructor report
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
New Features Coming to Expertiza Game mechanics …
Achievements system Reputation system Leaderboards Levels
Message boards Students can ask for help; other students can
answer Microtasks/micropayments
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Forthcoming: Achievement System Like in computer games. Categories in which achievement is tracked
Quality of submitted work Quality of reviews Contribution to team Helpfulness to other students
Prompt reviews/answers are more helpful, so reward for these …
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Forthcoming: Message Boards Student a posts a question Student b responds Student a rates student b’s response Others can rate response too.
TAs can also respond Reliability …
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Forthcoming: Microtasks/micropayments Desired enhancements posted
Along with amount of “payment” Students can voluntarily perform the
task. Students can also post tasks. How students should “pay” for these
tasks
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
For more info … http://research.csc.ncsu.edu/efg/expertiza Ed Gehringer, efg@ncsu.edu
Now, for the hands-on demo …
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Edit a Wiki Page1. Go to [redacted]
2. You will be redirected to this page:
3. Log in with “unctlt#” and password “unctlt”.
4. Return to UNC_TLT, click on your user # and start editing.
5. Save your page.
04/20/23 Gehringer, Rubric-based peer assessment of team projects, efg@ncsu.edu
Review a Wiki Page
1. After you save the page you were editing, log in at http://expertiza.ncsu.edu with the same username and password.
2. Click on “Others’ work”, then on “Begin” for one of the reviews.
3. Assign scores and give text comments.
Recommended