View
216
Download
1
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Everything we know. For You
Norse ConsultingAmanda AllenScott BeckerMax ColanerJohna JohnsChristine KohrsAnn StewardTerri Stickels
Objectives
Evaluation of the Taleo system Ease of job search and application
process Response time from the recruiter Interaction with the recruiter (if any)
Evaluation Process Data collected
• Applicant• Date Applied• Requisition number• Position title• Location
• Start time• End time• Number of clicks• Feelings• Communication
Application Process
• Applied for 1-2 jobs per week beginning October 3rd through November 6th
• Minimum of 12 per person• Total of 89 jobs
• Locations• Drake• University Hospital• West Chester• UC Health Business Center
Initial visit to website “My Account Options”
Font size and color are not easily discernible
Does not lead to profile creation
“Access My Profile” Font size and location
7.5 font! Scroll down screen in the
right side margin
“Job Search” Tab location
Out of way, scroll down to find it
Tab wording Overlooked tab because
of excessive words
Uploading resume Expect ease and convenience Auto-transfer function
Incorrectly transfers information Work Experience/School
information Refused information
Would not accept prospective date of graduation
Accommodate range of resume formats – or specify otherwise
Getting to the search page
Search pages options: There are two options that take us through
2 or 3 pages.
Effectiveness: Both routes are long and not direct.
Search options
There are many options that we can choose from to search for jobs, but the advanced options do not work properly.
The search box is not user friendly and hard to navigate.
Positives
We like that all priority jobs are listed first.
Taleo is used with some of your competitors so this is not new to applicants in the medical field.
Job titles
Job titles are inconsistent within the same locations and throughout different locations.
Job titles need to be user friendly, it is hard to tell what a job is by the title.
Unclear communication expectations
We expected to receive an additional email, and be notified when we were no longer under consideration, instead it was required for applicants to log in the UC Health website to find this information out.
Although we asked to received a rejection letter when we were no longer under consideration, we did not receive that email.
Screen shot
Unclear status titles/labels
We were uncertain in what each Submission status meant, and the differences in them.
For example, “Application received,” and “Reviewing Resume.” Even though these status can be clicked on, the only description is under “no longer under consideration.”
Length of time
As of November 14th, jobs applied for as far back as October 3rd are still in the “reviewing resume” phase.
We feel as if six weeks to not have an answer either way is lengthy, especially for these more “entry level” positions.
External comparisons
The hospitals we compared: The Christ Hospital Good Samaritan Hospital Mercy St. Elizabeth Tri Health
Internal comparisons by location
Application Received
Reviewing Resume
No Longer Under Consideration
Total
University Hospital
33 8 6 47
UC Business Center
4 4 14 22
West Chester 1 0 8 9
Drake 4 0 7 11
Total 42 12 35 89
University Hospital
70.21% 17.02% 12.77% 100%
UC Business Center
18.18% 18.18% 63.64% 100%
West Chester 11.11% 0 88.89% 100%
Drake 36.36% 0 63.64% 100%
Internal comparison
Submission status: application received, reviewing resume, no longer under consideration
Inactive (no longer accepting job submissions): 28 positions for submission statues with application received and reviewing resume
University Hospital: Application Received 70.21%, Reviewing Resume 17.02%, No longer under consideration 12.77%
Internal comparison cont…
UC Business Center: Application Received 18.18%, Reviewing Resume 18.18%, No longer under consideration 63.64%
West Chester: Application Received 11.11%, Reviewing Resume 0, No longer under consideration 88.89%
Drake: Application Received 36.36%, Reviewing Resume 0, No longer under consideration 63.64%
External comparison
St Elizabeth (2), Christ Hospital, Tri Health, Mercy (2), Good Sam
Positives from other sites: Gave jobs in alphabetical order, overall layout (req number, job type, department name, and location), user friendly, communication (received email after applying for position and once positions have been filled), uploading resume, gave better job descriptions and requirements for positions.
Negatives: asking for additional information such as
social security number, test was required to apply for a position
Terri
Recommended