View
9
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Electron scattering effects at physisorbed hydrogen molecules on break-junction electrodes and nanowires formation in hydrogen environmentM. van der Maas, S. Vasnyov, B. L. M. Hendriksen, O. I. Shklyarevskii, and S. Speller Citation: Low Temp. Phys. 38, 517 (2012); doi: 10.1063/1.4723676 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4723676 View Table of Contents: http://ltp.aip.org/resource/1/LTPHEG/v38/i6 Published by the American Institute of Physics. Related ArticlesBlue shift of plasmonic resonance induced by nanometer scale anisotropy of chemically synthesized goldnanospheres Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 043110 (2013) Coat thickness dependent adsorption of hydrophobic molecules at polymer brushes J. Chem. Phys. 138, 044904 (2013) Electrically tunable molecular doping of graphene Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 043101 (2013) Internal detection of surface plasmon coupled chemiluminescence during chlorination of potassium thin films J. Chem. Phys. 138, 034710 (2013) Molecular diffusion between walls with adsorption and desorption J. Chem. Phys. 138, 034107 (2013) Additional information on Low Temp. Phys.Journal Homepage: http://ltp.aip.org/ Journal Information: http://ltp.aip.org/about/about_the_journal Top downloads: http://ltp.aip.org/features/most_downloaded Information for Authors: http://ltp.aip.org/authors
Downloaded 31 Jan 2013 to 139.30.40.133. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://ltp.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
Electron scattering effects at physisorbed hydrogen molecules on break-junctionelectrodes and nanowires formation in hydrogen environment
M. van der Maas, S. Vasnyov, and B. L. M. Hendriksen
Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University of Nijmegen, Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED Nijmegen,The Netherlands
O. I. Shklyarevskiia)
Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University of Nijmegen, Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED Nijmegen,The Netherlands and B. Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physics and Engineering of the NationalAcademy of Sciences of Ukraine, 47 Lenin Ave., Kharkov 61103, Ukraine
S. Speller
Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University of Nijmegen, Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED Nijmegen,The Netherlands(Submitted January 17, 2012)
Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 38, 660–666 (June 2012)
Physisorption of hydrogen molecules on the surface of gold and other coinage metals has been stud-
ied using distance tunneling spectroscopy. We have observed that the distance dependence of the
tunnel current (resistance) displays a strong N-shaped deviation from exponential behavior. Such
deviations are difficult to explain within the Tersoff–Hamann approximation. We suggest the scat-
tering of tunneling electrons by H2 molecules as an origin for the observed effect. We have found
that this phenomenon is also common for strongly adsorbed organic molecules with a single
anchoring group. Pulling Au, Cu and Pt nanowires at 22 K in hydrogen environment shows that the
break-junction electrodes are still connected through hydrogen–metal monoatomic chains down to
very low conductance values of 10�4–10�6 G0. VC 2012 American Institute of Physics.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4723676]
1. Introduction
The idea to build electronic devices based on single mole-
cules dates back to 1974 (Ref. 1) when the concept of a molec-
ular rectifier was put forward. However, realistic experiments
on conductance through a single molecule placed between me-
tallic electrodes started 25 years later, when the modern tech-
niques were able to produce stable atomic-sized contacts.
These techniques include the Mechanically Controllable
Break-Junction (MCBJ) method, which is widely used in stud-
ies of the molecular junction conductance (see reviews Refs.
2–4 and references therein).
It is not surprising that the behavior of a hydrogen mole-
cule between the electrodes of MCBJ was studied very exten-
sively due to the simplicity of the object. Most of the
experiments were performed using transition metals. On
many occasions the interaction of hydrogen with the surface
of those metals is accompanied by molecular dissociation,
even at low temperatures, and is highly material specific.
Conductance of approximately one quantum unit G0 ¼ 2e2=h(1=G0 � 12:9 kX) through the hydrogen bridge between Pt
electrodes were reported in Ref. 5. In the case of Pt (and,
most probably, of ferromagnetic metals too6) the hydrogen
atoms can only be found on the surface and the hydrogen
bridge retains some of the properties of the H2 molecule.5,7,8
For Pd,9 however, the underlayer of hydrogen distinctly
changes the conductance through the hydrogen bridge. For
W, Mo and Ta the dissociation of H2 molecules is quickly
followed by dissolving of the hydrogen atoms (protons) into
the electrodes via quantum diffusion. This effect drastically
changes the conductance properties of the electrodes and
eventually makes measurements of the contact conductance
practically impossible.10,11
For gold the strong interaction between the adsorbed
molecules of hydrogen results in perceptible changes in the
individual conductance traces measured at disconnection of
the electrodes and therefore in conductance histograms. This
includes the appearance of the additional “fractional” peaks
when measured in hydrogen environment12 and incorpora-
tion of the hydrogen molecules (“hydrogen clamp”) in the
monoatomic chains. The latter effect results in reduction of
the chain conductivity and emerging of a periodic structure
in the conductance curves.13
The reason for the observed effect is the strong reactiv-
ity of the gold nanowires predicted in Refs. 14 and 15. The
strong interaction between gold nanoclusters and hydrogen
was reported in Ref. 16 and the potential applications of
gold nanostructures as catalysts, biochemical sensors etc. are
widely discussed in Ref. 17.
In this article we report measurements of the conduct-
ance effects of a physically adsorbed hydrogen molecule in a
MCBJ. This effect can be detected with the distance tunnel-
ing spectroscopy (DTS) method by measuring the contact
conductance as a function of the gap z between the electro-
des.18 The first experiments related to DTS were done on
physically adsorbed He (Ref. 19) and the deviation of the
tunneling conductance G(z) from exponential behavior was
attributed to the strong reduction of the electron density of
states close to the Fermi level by adsorbed atoms of helium
predicted by Lang.20 The same argument is given for scan-
ning tunneling hydrogen microscopy (STHM) contrast of a
1063-777X/2012/38(6)/6/$32.00 VC 2012 American Institute of Physics517
LOW TEMPERATURE PHYSICS VOLUME 38, NUMBER 6 JUNE 2012
Downloaded 31 Jan 2013 to 139.30.40.133. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://ltp.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
gold dimer on a gold surface,21 where on top of the dimer
(smaller tunneling gap) the conductance is lower than on the
edge. Weiss et al., argue that this is caused by depletion of
the local density of states due to the Pauli repulsion between
electrons in the metal and the electrons of the deuterium
molecule in the gap. On the other hand, the oscillating
behavior of the tunnel current lgIðzÞ (lgIðzÞ � log10IðzÞ)observed upon moving the STM tip in the direction perpen-
dicular to the adsorbed layers of H2O was explained by the
variation of the tunnel barrier height u in a rather wide range
between 0.8 and 2.4 eV.22 Both explanations were consistent
with the Tersoff–Hamann (TH) approximation.23 Some sit-
uations, however, e.g., heterogeneous sub-nanoscale envi-
ronment could need approaches beyond the scope of the TH
approach.
The data we are presenting here seem unlikely to be
explained by a straightforward TH approach, as this would
mean an increase of the barrier height to roughly 10 eV, or a
depletion of the density of states by about two orders of mag-
nitude. We propose a simple model based on the electron
scattering by physically adsorbed H2 molecules that might
explain the observed effects.
Additionally we have found that the similar dependences
of the tunnel conductance G(z) are characteristic for organic
molecules with a single anchoring group. In the direct con-
tact regime, the pulling characteristics for Au, Cu and Pt are
strikingly different from those observed for Au in Ref. 13.
2. Experiment
In our experiments we have used a standard MCBJ tech-
nique described elsewhere.24 All measurements have been
done either in a cryogenic ultra-high vacuum or in the
atmosphere of ultra-pure (99.9999%) hydrogen. The vacuum
pot with the sample has been cooled by pumping of He vapor
through a special transfer tube with a regulated input, in the
way similar to that used in flow cryostats. In spite of the rela-
tively low absolute accuracy of the Allen-Bradley carbon re-
sistor thermometer we used for temperature readings (the
error of the calibration curve at the temperatures of about
20 K can be as large as 60.2 K), we were able to maintain
the temperature of the sample within 60.01 K for suffi-
ciently long time (up to 3–4 h). Normally, the vacuum pot
was initially overcooled by� 1–2 K and the desirable tem-
perature was maintained with a heater, monitored by a Lake
Shore 340 temperature controller. The thermal drift of the
electrodes in the tunneling regime usually was less than
2–3 pm per minute.
All measurements presented below were done at 22 K
(above the boiling point of hydrogen 20.268 K). We found
that the effects reported below are rather insensitive to the
amount of hydrogen admitted into the vacuum pot and can
be observed at hydrogen pressures (measured at the top of
cryostat) ranging from 10�3 to 100 Torr.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Scattering of electrons by the hydrogen molecule
The most spectacular curves of the contact conductance
versus interelectrode separation z measured in the quantum
conductance units G0 ¼ 2e2=h for Au MCBJ are presented
in Fig. 1.
Under cryogenic UHV condition this dependence
demonstrates a perfect exponential behavior in the entire
range of conductances (curve 1). Admitting even a small
(�0.5 lM) amount of hydrogen results in a strong deviation
of G(z) from the exponential behavior. All curves presented
in Fig. 1 were measured in the process of approaching the
electrodes to each other up to a conductance less than 0.1 G0
(thereby avoiding a jump to the direct contact due to metallic
adhesion) and some of them also in the reverse process of
subsequent withdrawal of the electrodes (curves 1, 3). In the
most cases the resulting dependences are practically identi-
cal. Compared to our measurements on physisorbed He,19
the effect of adsorbed hydrogen molecules on the tunnel con-
ductance is much stronger. The tunnel current reaches the
maximum and then decreases as the distance between the
electrodes continue to decrease (curves 2–4). This singular-
ity usually occurs in the range between 10�2 and 10�4 G0.
The spread in the data is probably related to the variation in
the position of the adsorption potential minimum for H2 at
specific adsorption sites on the rough surface of the electro-
des (in some respects similar to the top, hollow or bridge
adsorption sites on a metallic surface). We assume that these
N-shape signatures in the curves presented in Fig. 1 corre-
spond to the situation when a hydrogen molecule adsorbed
on the “blunt” electrode is located directly opposite (or
slightly shifted) to the foremost atom of the “sharp” elec-
trode. In other cases the distortion of the lg G(z) curves is
less pronounced and reduced to a “plateau”. Fig. 2 shows the
transformation of those dependences due to the thermal drift
of the electrodes (with a switched off feedback circuit of the
temperature controller) in z and lateral directions. The esti-
mated drift in z and/or lateral direction does not exceed
1–2 A.
The bias dependence of the lg G(z) curves was observed
before in the case of the physically adsorbed helium.19 In a
10–6
10–5
10–4
10–3
10–2
10–1
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0, arb. unitsz
1 2 3 4
he
,G
/2
2
FIG. 1. Typical dependences of the contact conductance G versus electrode
separation z for a Au MCBJ in vacuum (curve 1), and in case of physically
adsorbed H2 (curves 2–4). The last dependence shows the possible presence
of a second layer of adsorbed hydrogen molecules (or the presence of a mol-
ecule adsorbed on the “sharp” electrode) at G dependence around 10�5G0
(indicated by the black arrow).
518 Low Temp. Phys. 38 (6), June 2012 van der Maas et al.
Downloaded 31 Jan 2013 to 139.30.40.133. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://ltp.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
rather narrow range of Vb (1–20 mV) the deviation from ex-
ponential behavior increased with the decrease of bias volt-
age. This effect could not be properly explained at that time.
For adsorbed hydrogen molecules the influence of Vb on the
shape of lg G(z) curves can be observed in a higher bias
range up to 100 mV (Fig. 3). At even higher bias voltages
the contact conductance becomes unstable and shows a sud-
den jump (see inset in Fig. 3). At Vb > 500 mV any record-
ing of lg G(z) is already practically impossible. Due to a
relatively high polarizability of the hydrogen molecule, the
instability starts at estimated field strength of 0.02–0.05 V/A,
whereas in the case of adsorbed He, the measurements at the
field strength as high as 0.5 V/A were still possible.
The measurements on Ag, Cu and Pt show clear devia-
tion of G(z) dependences from exponential behavior. How-
ever, this effect is less pronounced than in the case of Au. It
should be remarked that the conductance value correspond-
ing to the singularity in lg G(z) curves cannot be viewed as a
“conductance” through a hydrogen molecule, as in this case
it does not form chemical bonds with the electrodes.
As stated above the N-shaped lg G(z) curves are not eas-
ily explained using the TH model. Otherwise one must
accept either a reduction of electron DOS by 1–2 orders of
magnitude or a sudden few fold increase of the tunnel barrier
height u. The above results suggest that the most plausible
explanation for the effect observed might be scattering of the
tunneling electrons by a hydrogen molecule. At relatively
large separations between the electrodes (5 to 7 A) the scat-
tering is relatively small. As the distance between the elec-
trodes decreases, the percentage of tunneling electrons
scattered by the impenetrable hydrogen molecule rapidly
increases. At a certain moment this results in the reduction
of the tunnel current until the moment the repulsive Pauli
potential starts to expel the H2 molecule from the tunnel gap.
In Sec. 3.2 we use a simple model to reproduce in a simula-
tion the observed N-shape deviation described above.
3.2. Simple simulations
The exact description of the observed effects requires a
quantum mechanical approach and rather complicated calcu-
lations. However, the main features of the G(z) dependences
can be described qualitatively using a very simple classical
model presented in Fig. 4. This involves only geometrical
considerations. In this model we assume that one of the elec-
trodes is atomically flat on the scale of a few interatomic
distances while the second one is atomically sharp. The
hydrogen molecule is represented by an impenetrable for
electrons sphere of diameter d at the distance P � 2.5 A
from the flat electrode (for the majority of metals the dis-
tance between the surface and the physisorbed molecule is
2.3–2.7 A (Ref. 25)). The parameter Zpush represents the dis-
tance at which the expelling of the molecule starts, as the
separation between the electrodes decreases, and is held at
4.5–5 A. The distance Zpush of electrode 2 at which expelling
of the hydrogen molecule from the interelectrode space
begins is at the deepest point of the potential well in the
adsorption potential curve. For Au, Ag and Cu, the well is
approximately 30 meV deep.26 The expelling of the H2 mol-
ecule is done in a linear way, for every step electrode 1 takes
towards electrode 2 the molecule is expelled a step along the
plane of electrode 2 (i.e., perpendicular to the z-axis).We
10–6
10–5
10–4
10–3
8 6 4 2 0, arb. unitsz
1 2 3 4
he
,G
/2
2
10
10–2
10–1
FIG. 2. Evolution (from left to right) of G(z) dependences in the course of
the thermal drift of the electrodes as the temperature drops from 22 to
21.7 K with feedback switched off.
8 6 4 2 0, arb. unitsz
1010–6
10–5
10–4
10–3
10–2
10–1
10–3
he
,G
/2
2
8 6 4 2 0, arb. unitsz
10
10 mV
100 mV20 mV
he
,G
/2
2
FIG. 3. Part of the lg G(z) dependence for the same junction at different
bias voltages. Inset: unstable G(z) curve measured at Vb¼ 400 mV.
Z
P
d
Zpush
Electrode 1
Electrode 2
FIG. 4. Simple model for electron scattering on a H2 molecule. The shad-
owed area on electrode 2 represents the amount of backscattered electrons.
Low Temp. Phys. 38 (6), June 2012 van der Maas et al. 519
Downloaded 31 Jan 2013 to 139.30.40.133. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://ltp.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
also suggest that only electrons in the cone with solid angle
of 30� are contributing to the conductance. As the distance
between the two electrodes is decreased, the amount of back-
scattering by the hydrogen molecule increases. This is mod-
eled by an increase in the “shadow” of the molecule on
electrode 2. Under the above parameters, a satisfactory
agreement with the experiment can be found assuming that
the effective scattering radius is 0.5–0.6 A. For the diameter
d it gives 1.0–1.2 A for d and correlates with the small
dimension of a hydrogen molecule (the distance between
protons is 0.74 A).
3D plots of the G(z) dependences are presented in Fig. 5
as a function of the pushing distance Zpush assuming the scat-
tering radius Rscatt to be equal to 0.55 A (Fig. 5(a)) and as a
function of scattering radius at Zpush¼ 4.8 A (Fig. 5(b)). The
simulated characteristics clearly reproduce the effect of con-
ductance reduction observable in a relatively narrow range
of Zpush and Rscatt, respectively.
In the case when the hydrogen molecule is shifted away
from the contact axis, the effect of conductance reduction
disappears rather fast (curves 1 and 2 in Fig. 6). This corre-
lates with the fact that the experimental observation of this
effect occurs only for 5%–10% of all curves measured. The
simple model of scattering shows qualitatively the same
trend as observed in the data, however, is unable to explain
the apparent increase of the tunneling gap (Fig. 1). This
effect can be understood only if we suggest that some of the
tunneling parameters in TH approximations are not constant
and changing with z. It is a well-known fact that the adsorp-
tion of hydrogen on the surface may reduce or increase the
work function of the metal. This effect is included in curve 3(increase) and 4 (reduction of the work function) in Fig. 6 af-
ter the molecule is pushed out. The effect of electron scatter-
ing is not limited only to physically adsorbed hydrogen but
bears a universal character and can be observed on other suf-
ficiently strongly adsorbed molecules. To prove it we studied
the conductance traces of 1-pentanethiol and thiophenol
chemisorbed on the electrodes of gold MCBJ. These meas-
urements were done at room temperature in 1,2,4-trichlor-
benzene. (For experimental details of such measurements
see Ref. 27.)
We were able to detect the presence of 1-pentanethiol
and thiophenol at concentration as low as 10 nM. Typical
individual conductance curves show N-shaped behavior and
contribute to a distinct peak in the conductance histogram
presented in the lower panel of Fig. 7. However, the position
of the anomaly on individual conductance curves, and there-
fore position of the maximum in the conductance histogram,
may change within 1 to 2 orders of magnitude. Therefore, it
is impossible to identify the molecules by a single conduct-
ance value. However, the measurement is sufficiently sensi-
tive for the detection of molecules on the surface, by
identification of an N-shape in the conductance curves.
3.3. Pulling the nanowires in molecular hydrogenenvironment
All the measurements for hydrogen molecules presented
above have been done in the tunneling regime without bring-
ing the electrodes into direct mechanical and electrical con-
tact. In this section we present the conductance traces
measured in the course of pulling electrodes, starting from
direct contact with the conductances of 10–20 G0. It was
shown in Ref. 13 that a hydrogen molecule can be included in
a single-atom nanowire clamping to neighboring gold atoms.
At temperatures starting from 4.2 K and below 10–15 K our
results for pulling gold nanowires coincide nicely with these
10–5
10–4
10–3
he
,G
/2
2
10–2
10–1
1
5.04.9
4.84.7
87 6
5 4 3 21
z, arb. unitsZpush , Å
10–5
10–4
10–3
he
,G
/2
2
10–2
10–1
1
8 7 65 4 3 2
1
z, arb. units
0.460.50
0.540.58
Rscatt , Å
a
b
FIG. 5. 3D plots for the families of G(z) dependences as functions of the
pushing distance Zpush assuming the scattering radius Rscatt equal to 0.55 A
(a) and as functions of the scattering radius at Zpush¼ 4.8 A (b).
05101520
41 3 2
10–6
10–5
10–4
10–3
, arb. unitsz
he
,G
/2
2
10–2
10–1
FIG. 6. Conductance curves 1 and 2 are simulated for the hydrogen mole-
cule shifted from the contact axis by 0.1 and 0.2 A. Curves 3 and 4 corre-
spond to increase and reduction of the metal work function after expelling
the hydrogen molecule from the interelectrode space.
520 Low Temp. Phys. 38 (6), June 2012 van der Maas et al.
Downloaded 31 Jan 2013 to 139.30.40.133. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://ltp.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
data. The distance between the electrodes was calibrated
using either G(z) dependences measured in UHV or the linear
part of G(z) curves measured in a hydrogen environment.
Assuming that the work function values for Cu, Au and Pt are
between 4.5 and 5.5 eV we can safely use a coefficient as
(1 6 0.1) A per decade of conductance decay for calibration.
However, at higher temperatures (and an enhanced
amount of hydrogen) the behavior of the conductance curves
changes dramatically. Moreover, hydrogen-metal conducting
chains can be pulled from Cu which does not form mona-
tomic chains under UHV conditions. Like in the measure-
ments presented above, the temperature was 22 K and the
pressure of hydrogen 50 Torr. It should be noted also that the
pulling speed in most of the experiments was usually less
than 1 nm/min. A typical pulling curve for gold is presented
in Fig. 8(a) and shows that the electrodes stay connected at
distances as large as �1.5 nm or approximately 5 interatomic
distances. The conductance of the atomic chain drops as low
as 10�5 G0, or more than 3 order of magnitude below the
conductances reported in Ref. 13. Like in Ref. 13 the con-
ductance decreases in a non-monotonic way, with sudden
drops and subsequent recovery sometimes even to higher
values of G. This effect was explained in Ref. 13 on the
assumption that the conductance through the hydrogen mole-
cules stretched parallel to the contact axis is higher than for
molecules oriented perpendicular to it. This assumption is
based on simulations15 where the conductance through a
gold dimer welded by a hydrogen molecule was calculated.
The rich structure of G(z) curves in our experiments and the
low conductance of the atomic chain indicate that more than
one H2 molecule are incorporated into the nanowire in dif-
ferent configurations including probably “hydrogen wire”
configurations with conductances as low as 0.01G0. Possibly,
this is mainly due to the elevated temperature of the experi-
ment and high hydrogen pressure that ensures high mobility
and immediate availability of H2 molecules along the atomic
chain. It is likely that the low pulling speed also contributes
to the observed effects. On rare occasions the conductance
curves demonstrated quasiperiodic structure although a lack
of reliable statistics prevents us from drawing parallels with
the observation reported in Ref. 13.
We found that the “hydrogen clamp” also works for
some other materials. Not surprisingly, it occurs for silver
which is known for the possibility to pull short chains at
cryogenic UHV condition and long chains in the presence of
oxygen.28 The conductance curves of silver are similar to
those of gold. Platinum also forms monoatomic chains under
UHV conditions.29 Evidence that hydrogen molecules can
be incorporated in the monoatomic chains of Pt atoms was
presented in Ref. 30. Like in Ref. 13, these measurements
were done at 4.2 K and in the limited range of conductances
below G0. In our case the G(z) pulling curves for Pt look
somewhat different (Fig. 8(b)). They consist mainly of flat or
slightly tilted plateaus interchanged with the abrupt jumps in
conductance (up and down) of approximately one order of
magnitude. This difference in conductance behavior can be
explained by the fact that at 22 K the dissociation of hydro-
gen molecules is quite probable and a hydrogen atom (pro-
ton) can be incorporated into the monoatomic chain. For
gold such a situation results in a so-called “Hydrogen
Switch” reducing the wire conductance to zero.15 For Pt the
conductance through a single hydrogen atom is still possible
and most probably has little or no dependence on stretching
1
1
1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0
1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0
Au
Pt
10–6
10–5
10–4
10–3
, nmz
he
,G
/2
2 10–2
10–1
10–4
10–3
10–210–1
10–7
a
b
he
,G
/2
2FIG. 8. Typical conductance curve for a gold MCBJ, on approach to the
direct contact and, subsequent pulling of the nanowire (a). Pulling curves for
Pt (b).
1
100 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20
0
5
10
15
20
1 10
Time, s
10–5
10–4
10–3
he
,G
/2
2
10–2
10–1
10–5
10–4
10–3 10–2 10–1
01 ,stnuoc fo rebmu
N3
G, e h2 /2
FIG. 7. Conductance traces for adsorbed thiophenol molecules, measured
with a 10 Hz triangle ramp piezovoltage (a). Conductance histogram con-
structed from 2000 individual traces (b).
Low Temp. Phys. 38 (6), June 2012 van der Maas et al. 521
Downloaded 31 Jan 2013 to 139.30.40.133. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://ltp.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
(in contrast to the hydrogen molecule). That explains the
flatness of the plateaus in the conductance curves (Fig. 8(b)).
The transition from pulling the Pt wire to its compression is
usually accompanied by an immediate jump in conductance
at the return point. As we continue to compress the nano-
wire, the character of G(z) dependence remains generally the
same until the final transition to direct metallic contact. Note
that the “pulling distance” and the “return distance” are prac-
tically the same and therefore the process is completely
reversible.
For copper (in contrast to gold, silver, platinum or iridium)
the monoatomic chains have never been observed under UHV
conditions, although according to Ref. 28 such an effect is pos-
sible under an oxygen atmosphere at elevated temperatures.
Fractional conductance of gold and copper has been observed
for nanocontacts in solution under electrochemical potential
control in the range of hydrogen evolution.31 Theoretical anal-
ysis performed in Ref. 32 demonstrated that a Cu nanowire
can be rather reactive to hydrogen. In our experiments we
observed two distinct types of copper nanowire behavior.
Some of the contacts demonstrated the pulling curves
that were also characteristic both for Au and Ag with an
unavoidable break at conductances of 10�3–10�4 G0 (see
Fig. 9(a)). For other curves the final break to zero conduct-
ance did not occur until G � 10�6 G0 (Fig. 9(b)) and, for a
larger part, the contact conductance decreases in a gradual
way. The difference between these two types of dependences
might very well be related to the crystallographic orienta-
tions of the electrodes. It is also possible that hydrogen mol-
ecules can be incorporated into the other parts of the
electrode surface besides the monoatomic chain. In conclu-
sion, we found that the deviations of lg G(z) curves from ex-
ponential behavior in the presence of hydrogen physisorbed
on the surface of MCBJ electrodes cannot be easily
explained within the framework of Tersoff-Hamann approxi-
mation by variation of the electron DOS in the electrodes or
the tunnel barrier height u. We propose that a plausible
model for the observed effects is the backscattering of tun-
neling electrons by the hydrogen molecule.
Part of this work was supported by the Nanotechnology
network in the Netherlands NanoNed and the Stichting voor
Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM) which is finan-
cially supported by the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Weten-
schappelijk Onderzoek (NWO). O.I.S. wants to thank FOM
and NWO for the visitor grant.
a)Email: shklyarevskii@ilt.kharkov.ua
1A. Aviram and M. A. Ratner, Chem. Phys. Lett. 29, 277 (1974).2R. L. McCreery, Chem. Mater. 16, 4477 (2004).3F. Chen, J. Hihath, Z. F Huang, X. L. Li, and N. J. Tao, Annu. Rev. Phys.
Chem. 58, 535 (2007).4N. J. Tao, Nature Nanotechnol. 1, 173 (2006).5R. H. M. Smit, Y. Noat, C. Untiedt, N. D. Lang, M. C. van Hemert, and
J. M. van Ruitenbeek, Nature 419, 906 (2002).6C. Untiedt, D. M. T. Dekker, D. Djukic, and J. M. van Ruitenbeek, Phys.
Rev. B 69, 081401(R) (2004).7D. Djukic, K. S. Thygesen, C. Untiedt, R. H. M. Smit, K. W. Jacobsen,
and J. M. van Ruitenbeek, Phys. Rev. B 71, 161402 (2005).8K. S. Thygesen and K. W. Jacobsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 036807 (2005).9Sz. Csonka, A. Halbritter, G. Mihaly, E. Jurdik, O. I. Shklyarevskii,
S. Speller, and H. van Kempen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 016802 (2004).10D. den Boer, O. I. Shklyarevskii, J. A. A. W. Elemans, and S. Speller,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 61, 239 (2007).11D. den Boer, O. I. Shklyarevskii, J. A. A. W. Elemans, and S. Speller,
Phys. Rev. B 77, 165423 (2008).12Sz. Csonka, A. Halbritter, G. Mihaly, O. I. Shklyarevskii, S. Speller, and
H. van Kempen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 016802 (2004).13Sz. Csonka, A. Halbritter, and G. Mihaly, Phys. Rev. B 73, 075405
(2006).14S. R. Bahn, N. Lopez, J. K. Norskov, and K. W. Jacobsen, Phys. Rev. B
66, 081405(R) (2002).15R. N. Barnett, H. Hakkinen, A. G. Scherbakov, and U. Landman, Nano
Lett. 4, 1845 (2004).16H. J. Zhai, B. Kiran, and L. S. Wang, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 8231 (2004).17G. J. Hutchings, M. Brust and H. Schmidbaur, Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 1759
(2008).18J. Halbritter, G. Repphun, S. Vinzelberg, G. Staikov, and W. J. Lorenz,
Electrochim. Acta 40, 1394 (1995).19R. J. P. Keijsers, J. Voets, O. I. Shklyarevskii, and H. van Kempen, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 76, 1138 (1996).20N. D. Lang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1164 (1986).21C. Weiss, C. Wagner, C. Kleimann, M. Rohlfing, F. S. Tautz, and R.
Temirov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 086103 (2010).22M. Hugelmann and W. Schindler, Surf. Sci. 541, L643 (2003).23J. Tersoff and D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1998 (1983).24N. Agrait, A. Levy Yeyati, and J. M. van Ruitenbeek, Phys. Rep. 377,
8103 (2003).25C. M. Brown, Y. Liu, and D. A. Neumann, Pramana–J. Phys. 71, 755
(2008).26S. Andersson, Z. Wilzen, and M. Persson, Phys. Rev. B 38, 2967 (1988).27D. den Boer, M. J. J. Coenen, M. van der Maas, T. P. J. Peters, O. I.
Shklyarevskii, J. A. A. W. Elemans, A. E. Rowan, and S. Speller, J. Phys.
Chem. C 113, 15412 (2009).28W. H. A. Thijssen, D. Marjenburgh, R. H. Bremmer, and J. M. van Ruiten-
beek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 026806 (2006).29R.H.M. Smit, PhD dissertation, Universiteit Leiden, 2003.30M. Kiguchi, R. Stadler, I. S. Kristensen, D. Djukic, and J. M. van Ruiten-
beek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146802 (2007).31M. Kiguchi, T. Konishi, S. Miura, and K. Murakoshi, Nanotechnology 18,
424011 (2007).32E. Santos, P. Quaino, G. Soldano, and W. Schmickler, Electrochem. Com-
mun. 11, 1764 (2009).
This article was published in English in the original Russian journal. Repro-
duced here with stylistic changes by AIP.
1
1
1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0
10–5
10–4
10–3
, nmz
10–2
10–1
10–4
10–3
10–2
10–1
a
b
1.6 1.410
–6
10–5
Cu
Cu
he
,G
/2
2h
e,G
/2
2
FIG. 9. Two types of conductance curves for copper MCBJ on approach to
direct contact and subsequent pulling of the nanowire.
522 Low Temp. Phys. 38 (6), June 2012 van der Maas et al.
Downloaded 31 Jan 2013 to 139.30.40.133. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://ltp.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
Recommended