View
3
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
1
Dr. Justin Lenzo Demonstratives
Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 1 of 34
2
Updated Table 1: Counts and Percentages of Detained and Total Age-Outs with Evidence of Potential Risk Factors—October 17, 2018 – May 24, 2019
Detained Age-Outs All Age-Outs
Evidence Indicated in AORFs CountShare of Detained
Age-Outs (%) CountShare of All Age-
Outs (%)
Total Age-Outs 285 100.0% 1,005 100.0%
1. No Evidence Indicating Danger to Community 254 89.1% 943 93.8%
2. Additionally, No Evidence Indicating Danger to Self 248 87.0% 929 92.4%
3. Additionally, Availability of Potential Sponsor 231 81.1% 911 90.6%
4. Additionally, No Evidence Indicating Risk of FlightThat Would Not Be Addressed by a Sponsor 229 80.4% 908 90.3%
Source: Updated Expert Report and Exhibits of J. Lenzo
Pls.' Demo 007Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 2 of 34
3
Updated Table 2:Available Potential Sponsors for Detained Age-Outs
Evidence Indicated by Data Source
Count ofDetained Age-
OutsShare of Detained
Age-Outs (%)
Count ofDetained Age-Outs with NoEvidence ofDanger to
Community or Self
Share of DetainedAge-Outs withNo Evidence of
Danger toCommunity or
Self
All Detained Age Outs 285 100.0% 248 100.0%
Sponsor Listed 153 53.7% 130 52.4%
Sponsor Listed or Group Sponsor Available 268 94.0% 231 93.1%Source: Updated Expert Report and Exhibits of J. Lenzo
Pls.' Demo 008Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 3 of 34
4
Updated Supplemental Table 1:Detained Age-Outs Who Were Subsequently Released, by Type of Release—January 1, 2018 - May 24, 2019
Release Status Age-Outs PercentageBonded Out 466 61.9%
Order of recognizance 262 34.8%
Paroled 19 2.5%
Order of supervision 6 0.8%
Note: Chart from Expert Report was updated to reflect that being “Removed” is different than being “Released”
Source: RFP #18 Data and Interrogatory #6 Data.
Pls.' Demo 009Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 4 of 34
5
Updated Supplemental Table 2:Detention Durations Among Detained Age-Outs—January 1, 2018 - May 24, 2019
Length-of-Stay Count PercentageDetained 1+ days 1,342 88.3%
Detained 7+ days 1,281 84.3%
Detained 14+ days 1,174 77.3%
Detained 30+ days 977 64.3%
Detained 60+ days 597 39.3%
Detained 90+ days 327 21.5%Source: Updated Expert Report and Exhibits of J. Lenzo
Pls.' Demo 010Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 5 of 34
6
Updated Supplemental Table 3: Detention Durations Among Detained Age-OutsWho Were Subsequently Released—January 1, 2018 - May 24, 2019
Length-of-Stay Count PercentageDetained 1+ days 583 80.1%
Detained 7+ days 543 74.6%
Detained 14+ days 468 64.3%
Detained 30+ days 356 48.9%
Detained 60+ days 186 25.5%
Detained 90+ days 91 12.5%Source: Updated Expert Report and Exhibits of J. Lenzo
Pls.' Demo 011Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 6 of 34
7
Updated Exhibit 4:Share of UACs That Have Been Detained, by AOR and Month— April 2016 - July 2019 (Page 1 of 2)
Share of UACs Detained
AORDate of Age Out (May Differ from Date of Detention)
Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17Atlanta 0% 0% 17Baltimore 0% 0%Boston 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%BuffaloChicago 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 71% 86% 100% 100% 100% 67% 100% 100% 100% 67% 100% 100% 100%Dallas 0% 0% 0% 0%Denver 0%Detroit 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%El Paso 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9% 31% 38% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Harlingen 96% 71% 63% 76% 71% 78% 85% 2% 78% 80% 87% 32% 44% 50% 67% 77% 58% 84%Houston 80% 31% 14% 93% 5% 48% 83% 39% 100% 93% 57% 86% 100% 80% 36% 0% 88% 100%Los Angeles 0% 0% 14% 50% 0% 25% 0% 0% 67% 33% 100% 50%Miami 0% 100% 100% 89% 0% 100% 100% 85% 83% 0% 100% 50% 100%New Orleans 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%New York 33% 100% 100% 100% 60% 50% 50% 67% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 67% 88%Newark 0%Philadelphia 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%Phoenix 60% 75% 90% 82% 75% 60% 86% 67% 46% 37% 25% 27% 0% 50% 50% 50% 45% 24%San Antonio 0% 0% 0% 11% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 0% 50%San Diego 50% 100% 100% 50% 33% 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 67%San Francisco 50% 100% 100% 100% 67% 75% 80% 50% 50% 100% 50% 100% 40% 100% 50%Seattle 0% 50% 33% 100% 57% 33% 50% 33% 25% 67% 0% 0% 50%Washington DC 33% 67% 50% 33% 25% 60% 100% 0% 17% 25% 67% 33% 20% 100% 0% 75% 67% 0%Total 63% 45% 55% 64% 47% 52% 62% 27% 60% 58% 51% 38% 57% 50% 38% 49% 60% 59%
Source: Updated Expert Report and Exhibits of J. Lenzo
Pls.' Demo 012Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 7 of 34
7A
Updated Exhibit 4A: Share of UACs That Have Been Detained, by AOR and Month— April 2016 - July 2019
Share of UACs Detained
AORDate of Age Out (May Differ from Date of Detention)
Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17AtlantaBaltimore 100%Boston 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%BuffaloChicago 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 71% 100% 100% 67% 100% 67% 100% 100% 100% 67% 100% 100% 100% 100% 86% 100%DallasDenverDetroit 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%El Paso 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 0% 0% 0% 8% 15% 89% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100%Harlingen 96% 75% 89% 79% 88% 88% 59% 2% 9% 3% 14% 94% 80% 63% 80% 91% 78% 72% 92% 75% 55%Houston 100% 100% 93% 100% 95% 95% 83% 94% 83% 96% 86% 86% 100% 80% 100% 100% 86% 100% 100% 100% 100%Los Angeles 33% 0% 17% 0% 50% 0% 38% 0% 0% 100% 33% 50% 50% 50% 67% 100%Miami 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 86% 100% 100% 50% 100% 0% 100%New OrleansNew York 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 67% 100% 100% 89% 100%Newark 100%Philadelphia 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 33% 0% 0%Phoenix 100% 88% 90% 82% 81% 73% 86% 73% 69% 56% 17% 50% 0% 50% 44% 83% 73% 41% 80% 88% 100%San Antonio 0% 17% 0% 17% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8% 0% 0% 0% 7% 14% 0% 22% 7% 0% 0%San Diego 100% 0% 100% 0% 67% 100% 33% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 83% 100% 50%San Francisco 67% 100% 100% 100% 67% 75% 80% 50% 67% 100% 50% 100% 33% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100%Seattle 0% 33% 67% 100% 57% 50% 100% 50% 0% 67% 0% 0% 0% 50% 67% 100% 0%Washington DC 67% 67% 50% 25% 50% 29% 50% 0% 17% 29% 67% 33% 14% 100% 0% 75% 50% 0% 50% 50% 0%
Total 71% 63% 70%
63% 67% 62% 54% 38% 36% 41% 47% 56% 63% 51% 51% 65% 67% 59% 66% 69% 61%
Source: Updated Exhibit 4A of J. Lenzo
Pls.' Demo 012ACase 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 8 of 34
8
Updated Exhibit 4:Share of UACs That Have Been Detained, by AOR and Month— April 2016 - July 2019 (Page 2 of 2)
Share of UACs DetainedDate of Age Out (May Differ from Date of Detention)
Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-18 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Total0% 0%
0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 22%50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5%
0% 0%80% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 100% 80% 40% 17% 33% 0% 8% 0% 25% 0% 50% 0% 64%
0% 0% 0%0%
100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 13%75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 75% 80% 67% 63% 100% 100% 90% 100% 100% 100% 56%93% 95% 84% 84% 97% 98% 84% 86% 85% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 46%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 100% 100% 100% 95% 90% 94% 100% 100% 100% 92% 100% 100% 80%100% 67% 100% 0% 50% 100% 100% 60% 100% 86% 100% 50% 100% 33% 60% 67% 75% 52%100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 79% 100% 100% 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% 92%
0% 0%100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 71% 100% 100% 100% 67% 80% 100% 50% 88% 100% 75% 75% 84%
0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 25%0% 100% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5%
75% 62% 55% 71% 77% 80% 88% 84% 63% 78% 42% 54% 71% 71% 91% 100% 71% 100% 100% 66%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8% 0% 8% 0% 6% 5% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% 8% 3%0% 50% 17% 0% 25% 50% 33% 20% 67% 67% 100% 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% 46%
75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 100% 25% 0% 0% 50% 60% 100% 100% 69%100% 67% 100% 0% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% 100% 33% 0% 0% 100% 49%75% 20% 78% 83% 80% 100% 80% 40% 33% 100% 50% 20% 100% 100% 100% 20% 50% 45%74% 68% 69% 71% 74% 78% 80% 76% 71% 38% 31% 27% 30% 29% 36% 35% 32% 34% 61% 52%
Source: Updated Expert Report and Exhibits of J. Lenzo
AOR Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17Atlanta 0% 0%Baltimore 100%BostonBuffaloChicago 100% 56% 100%Dallas 0%DenverDetroit 0% 0%El Paso 100% 100% 100%Harlingen 75% 82% 50%Houston 50% 88% 100%Los Angeles 50% 67% 100%Miami 0% 67%New Orleans 0%New York 100% 80% 100%Newark 100%Philadelphia 33% 0% 0%Phoenix 64% 67% 88%San Antonio 9% 0% 0%San Diego 33% 50% 20%San Francisco 100% 100% 67%Seattle 67% 100% 0%Washington DC 33% 50% 0%Total 53% 65% 54%
Pls.' Demo 013Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 9 of 34
8A
Updated Exhibit 4A: Share of UACs That Have Been Detained, by AOR and Month— April 2016 - July 2019
Share of UACs Detained
AORDate of Age Out (May Differ from Date of Detention)
Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-18 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 TotalAtlantaBaltimore 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 19%Boston 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Buffalo 0% 0%Chicago 80% 100% 100% 100% 75% 75% 100% 83% 40% 17% 25% 0% 8% 0% 25% 0% 50% 0% 63%Dallas 0% 0% 0%DenverDetroit 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 8%El Paso 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 80% 90% 67% 63% 100% 100% 90% 100% 100% 100% 59%Harlingen 100% 86% 97% 78% 79% 96% 93% 97% 82% 4% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 2% 0% 0% 41%Houston 100% 100% 88% 86% 100% 100% 94% 100% 95% 100% 95% 95% 94% 100% 100% 100% 92% 100% 100% 96%Los Angeles 100% 67% 50% 0% 50% 100% 100% 60% 100% 86% 100% 50% 75% 33% 60% 67% 75% 54%Miami 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 86% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% 96%New OrleansNew York 89% 100% 75% 100% 100% 86% 100% 100% 100% 67% 80% 100% 75% 88% 100% 75% 75% 90%Newark 0% 0% 0% 0% 17%Philadelphia 0% 100% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5%Phoenix 95% 96% 91% 96% 97% 92% 100% 100% 94% 91% 88% 92% 93% 86% 91% 100% 71% 100% 100% 84%San Antonio 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 8% 0% 6% 4% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 3%San Diego 100% 100% 83% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 89%San Francisco 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 57% 50% 100% 50% 100% 67% 50% 60% 100% 100% 74%Seattle 100% 67% 100% 0% 60% 50% 75% 22% 100% 100% 33% 0% 0% 100% 48%Washington DC 80% 20% 89% 80% 80% 100% 75% 80% 33% 100% 80% 67% 100% 100% 100% 20% 50% 49%
71% 75% 71% 73% 83% 83% 82% 73% 42% 38% 31% 33% 30% 36% 35% 32% 34% 61% 55% J. LSource: Updated Exhibit 4A of J. Lenzo
Pls.' Demo 013ACase 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 10 of 34
9
Updated Exhibit 5:Detention Rates by Field Office—October 17, 2018 to May 24, 2019
Field OfficeTotal Age-
OutsDetainedAge-Outs
PercentageDetained
Detention Percentage Statistically Higher than
SNA?Harlingen 405 2 .05% No
San Antonio 117 3 2.6% No
Houston 101 98 97.0% Yes
Phoenix 72 34 47.2% Yes
Chicago 65 9 13.8% Yes
Miami 52 50 96.2% Yes
El Paso 35 28 80.0% Yes
Philadelphia 32 0 0.0% No
New York 31 24 77.4% Yes
Los Angeles 29 21 72.4% Yes
Washington, DC 17 5 29.4% Yes
San Francisco 16 4 25.0% Yes
Baltimore 10 0 0.0% No
Seattle 8 5 62.5% Yes
San Diego 6 2 33.3% Yes
Boston 5 0 0.0% No
Detroit 3 0 0.0% No
Newark 1 0 0.0% No
Total 1005 285 28.4%Source: Updated Expert Report and Exhibits of J. Lenzo
Pls.' Demo 014Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 11 of 34
10
Updated Exhibit 6: Detention Rates by Field Office Among Age-Outs with No Evidence of Risk Factors—October 17, 2018 to May 24, 2019
Field OfficeTotal Age-
OutsDetainedAge-Outs
PercentageDetained
Detention Percentage Statistically Higher than
SNA?Harlingen 398 2 0.5% No
San Antonio 106 0 0.0% No
Houston 100 98 98.0% Yes
Phoenix 70 33 47.1% Yes
Chicago 59 6 10.2% Yes
Miami 47 46 97.9% Yes
El Paso 33 27 81.8% Yes
Philadelphia 31 0 0.0% No
New York 17 12 70.6% Yes
Los Angeles 9 3 33.3% Yes
Washington, DC 7 0 0.0% No
San Francisco 6 0 0.0% No
Baltimore 9 0 0.0% No
Seattle 3 1 33.3% No
San Diego 5 1 20.0% No
Boston 4 0 0.0% No
Detroit 3 0 0.0% No
Newark 1 0 0.0% No
Total 908 229 25.2%Source: Updated Expert Report and Exhibits of J. Lenzo
Pls.' Demo 015Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 12 of 34
11
Updated Exhibit 7: Regression Results
Source: Updated Expert Report and Exhibits of J. Lenzo
Pls.' Demo 016Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 13 of 34
12
Updated Exhibit 7: Regression Results
Source: Updated Expert Report and Exhibits of J. Lenzo
Pls.' Demo 017Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 14 of 34
13
Updated Exhibit 8: Effects Analysis
Probit Model with Combination 1 of the Risk Factors
Characteristic of Age-Out Estimated Effect on Probability ofBeing Detained
95% Confidence Interval forEffect on Probability of Being
DetainedEvidence of Danger to the Community 0.9% -4.9% - 7.9%Evidence of Danger to Self -2.6% -8.2% - 3.9%Evidence of Lack of Sponsor or Risk of FlightUnaddressed by Release to Sponsor 32.2% 19.1% - 46.8%
Evidence of All the Above Factors 28.0% 16.8% - 41.6%
Aged-Out of El Paso AOR 80.2% 67.9% - 87.6%Aged-Out of Houston AOR 94.2% 88.5% - 96.6%Aged-Out of Los Angeles AOR 34.6% 17.6% - 54.6%Aged-Out of Miami AOR 93.8% 86.2% - 96.7%Aged-Out of New York City AOR 66.2% 49.9% - 78.6%Aged-Out of Phoenix AOR 46.1% 36.7% - 54.8%
Source: Updated Expert Report and Exhibits of J. Lenzo
Pls.' Demo 018Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 15 of 34
14
Updated Exhibit 8: Effects Analysis
Source: Updated Expert Report and Exhibits of J. Lenzo
Probit Model with Combination 2 of the Risk Factors
Characteristic of Age-Out Estimated Effect on Probability ofBeing Detained
95% Confidence Interval forEffect on Probability of Being
DetainedEvidence of Any Risk Factor 12.7% 8.1% - 18.4%
Aged-Out of El Paso AOR 80.6% 68.8% - 88.1%Aged-Out of Houston AOR 95.2% 90.0% - 97.4%Aged-Out of Los Angeles AOR 51.5% 35.1% - 68.7%Aged-Out of Miami AOR 94.3% 87.6% - 97.1%Aged-Out of New York City AOR 62.0% 45.3% - 75.6%Aged-Out of Phoenix AOR 47.8% 38.3% - 56.3%
Pls.' Demo 019Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 16 of 34
15
Comparison of In-Absentia Rates
Year
Non-UAC [1] UAC [1] Age-Outs, Never Detained [2]Age-Outs, Detained But Subsequently
Released [2]
Total
In-Absentia Removal Orders
Percent In-Absentia Total
In-Absentia Removal Orders
Percent In-Absentia Total
In-Absentia Removal Orders
Percent In-Absentia Total
In-Absentia Removal Orders
Percent In-Absentia
2014 73,165 23,678 32% 3,331 2,112 63%
2015 76,881 31,000 40% 13,554 7,198 53%
2016 75,277 27,800 37% 14,785 6,408 43%
2017 82,711 35,115 42% 13,331 6,799 51%
2018 106,763 39,353 37% 12,545 6,705 53% 481 26 5% 447 46 10%
2019 118,685 52,041 44% 9,116 5,498 60% 414 10 2% 111 3 3%
Source:[1] Executive Office for Immigration Review.[2] RFP 18, RFP 21, IROG 6, In-Absentia Data.
Pls.' Demo 020Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 17 of 34
16
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: San Antonio
Ex. 4 at 17; Sources: Age Out Review Forms and Monthly Age Out Reports; Responses to RFP 18 and 21.
0% 0% 0%
11%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
15%
0%
50%
9%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
8%
0%
8%
0%
6% 5%
0% 0% 0%
6%
0%
8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Pls.' Demo 021Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 18 of 34
16A
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: San Antonio
Sources: Responses to RFP 21.
0%
17%
0%
17%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
8%
0% 0% 0%
7%
14%
0%
22%
7%
0% 0% 0% 0%
5%
0% 0%
8%
0%
6% 4%
0%
5%
0% 0% 0%
6%
0% 0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Pls.' Demo 021ACase 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 19 of 34
17
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: Harlingen
96%
71%
63%
76%
71%
78%
85%
2%
78%80%
87%
32%
44%
50%
67%
77%
58%
84%
75%
82%
50%
93%95%
84% 84%
97% 98%
84%86% 85%
1% 1% 2%0% 0% 0%
2%0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Ex. 4 at 17; Sources: Age Out Review Forms and Monthly Age Out Reports; Responses to RFP 18 and 21.
Pls.' Demo 022Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 20 of 34
17A
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: Harlingen
Sources: Responses to RFP 21.
96%
75%
89%
79%
88% 88%
59%
2%
9%
3%
14%
94%
80%
63%
80%
91%
78%
72%
92%
75%
55%
100%
86%
97%
78% 79%
96%93%
97%
82%
4%1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Pls.' Demo 022ACase 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 21 of 34
18
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: Chicago100%100%100%100%
71%
86%
100%100%100%
67%
100%100%100%
67%
100%100%100%100%100%
56%
100%
80%
100%100%100%100%
75%
100%
80%
40%
17%
33%
0%
8%
0%
25%
0%
50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Ex. 4 at 17; Sources: Age Out Review Forms and Monthly Age Out Reports; Responses to RFP 18 and 21.
Pls.' Demo 023Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 22 of 34
18A
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: Chicago
Sources: Responses to RFP 21.
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
71%
100% 100%
67%
100%
67%
100% 100% 100%
67%
100% 100% 100% 100%
86%
100%
80%
100% 100% 100%
75% 75%
100%
83%
40%
17%
25%
0%
8%
0%
25%
0%
50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Pls.' Demo 023ACase 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 23 of 34
19
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: Houston
80%
31%
14%
93%
5%
48%
83%
39%
100%
93%
57%
86%
100%
80%
36%
0%
88%
100%
50%
88%
100%100%100%100%100%100%100%
94%
100%100%100%95%
90%
94%
100%100%100%
92%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Ex. 4 at 17; Sources: Age Out Review Forms and Monthly Age Out Reports; Responses to RFP 18 and 21.
Pls.' Demo 024Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 24 of 34
19A
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: Houston
Sources: Responses to RFP 21.
100% 100%
93%
100%
95% 95%
83%
94%
83%
96%
86% 86%
100%
80%
100% 100%
86%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
88%86%
100% 100%
94%
100%
95%
100%
95% 95% 94%
100% 100% 100%
92%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Pls.' Demo 024ACase 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 25 of 34
20
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: Miami
0%
100%100%
89%
0%
100%100%
85%83%
0%
100%
50%
100%
0%
67%
100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%
79%
100%100%95%
100%100%100%100%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Ex. 4 at 17; Sources: Age Out Review Forms and Monthly Age Out Reports; Responses to RFP 18 and 21.
Pls.' Demo 025Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 26 of 34
20A
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: Miami
Sources: Responses to RFP 21.
0%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
86%
100% 100%
50%
100%
0%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
86%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
* * * * * *
*No age-outs reported this month
**
Pls.' Demo 025ACase 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 27 of 34
21
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: El Paso
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
9%
31%
38%
100%100%100% 100%100%100%100%100%100%
75%
100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%
75%
80%
67%
63%
100%100%
90%
100%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Ex. 4 at 17; Sources: Age Out Review Forms and Monthly Age Out Reports; Responses to RFP 18 and 21.
Pls.' Demo 026Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 28 of 34
21A
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: El Paso
Sources: Responses to RFP 21.
0% 0% 0% 0%
11%
0% 0% 0%
8%
15%
89%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
50%
100% 100%
75%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
80%
90%
67%
63%
100% 100%
90%
100%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
*
*No age-outs reported this month
Pls.' Demo 026ACase 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 29 of 34
22
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: New York
33%
100%100% 100%
60%
50% 50%
67%
0%
100%
0%
100% 100%100%
67%
88%
80%
100%100%100%100%100%100%
71%
100%100%100%
67%
80%
100%
50%
88%
100%
75% 75%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Ex. 4 at 17; Sources: Age Out Review Forms and Monthly Age Out Reports; Responses to RFP 18 and 21.
Pls.' Demo 027Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 30 of 34
22A
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: New York
Sources: Responses to RFP 21.
100% 100% 100% 100%
75%
100% 100% 100%
0%
100% 100% 100% 100%
67%
100% 100%
89%
100%
89%
100%
75%
100% 100%
86%
100% 100% 100%
67%
80%
100%
75%
88%
100%
75% 75%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
* * *
*No age-outs reported this month
Pls.' Demo 027ACase 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 31 of 34
23
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019
63%
45%
55%
64%
47%
52%
62%
27%
60%58%
51%
38%
57%
50%
38%
49%
60% 59%
53%
65%
54%
74%
68% 69%71%
74%
78%80%
76%
71%
38%
31%
27%30% 29%
36% 35%32%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Ex. 4 at 17
Pls.' Demo 028Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 32 of 34
23A
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: Total
Sources: Responses to RFP 21.
71%
63%
70%
63%
67%
62%
54%
38%36%
41%
47%
56%
63%
51% 51%
65%67%
59%
66%69%
61%
78%
71%
75%
71%73%
83% 83% 82%
73%
42%38%
31%33%
30%
36% 35%32%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Pls.' Demo 028ACase 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 33 of 34
Monthly Detention Rate, April 2016 - May 2019: Phoenix
Sources: Responses to RFP 21.
100%
88%90%
82% 81%
73%
86%
73%
69%
56%
17%
50%
0%
50%
44%
83%
73%
41%
80%
88%
100%
95%96%
91%
96% 97%
92%
100% 100%
94%91%
88%92% 93%
86%
91%
100%
71%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Pls.' Demo 064Case 1:18-cv-00508-RC Document 260-1 Filed 12/01/19 Page 34 of 34
Recommended