DISARM: a short introduction...DISARM: a H2020 thematic network • Thematic networks = compiling...

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 817591

Disseminating Innovative Solutions for Antibiotic Resistance Management

DISARM: a short introduction

Dr. Erwin Wauters, Flanders research institute for agriculture, fisheries and food (ILVO)

DISARM: objective

“Reduce antibiotic resistance by

cutting the need for antibiotics in livestock farmingby

focussing on disease prevention and prudent use of antibiotics”

Coordinated by Partners

Who is DISARM?

DISARM: a H2020 thematic network

• Thematic networks = compiling knowledge ready for practice

• collecting existing scientific knowledge and best practices which are close to being put into practice, but not yet sufficiently ready for farmers and foresters to implement;

• translating this knowledge into easily understandable end-user material such as short, informative recommendations and solutions (“practice abstracts”), leaflets, guidelines and audio-visual material (photos, video clips, etc.)

DISARM: ideas and assumptions

• Strong link between level of use and antibiotic resistance;

• As little as possible, as much as necessary;• Reduce, replace, rethink;• From disseminating solutions to disseminating methods to identify the solutions for a specific context;

• From external motivation towards internal motivation;• From focus on farmers to focus on the entire complex of actors and factors.

Strong link between the level of use and antibiotic resistance

• EC calls for more prudent use, a usage that causes less antibiotic resistance

• Evidence says• Strong link between level of use and antibiotic resistance

more prudent often means a reduction• Level of usage is often more habit rather than clear

deliberation based on health status and risk focus on people’s behaviour and motivation

• Production, health and welfare can be maintained with much less antibiotics better management, biosecurity, good husbandry practice

As little as possible, as much as necessary

• Zero use is not the final aim• Reducing actual usage to as little as possible, as much as necessary

• Reducing the need forantibiotics

• Farm-specific improvement• Level of usage but also quality of usage

• Reduce: motivation, knowledge awareness to as little as possible, as much as necessary

• Replace: vaccines, probiotics, prebiotics, bacteriophages and organic acids

• Rethink: biosecurity, husbandry practices, production systems

Reduce, replace, rethink

Figures by EFSA

Disseminating solutions and methods toidentify the best solution

• We look for solutions in better preventive livestock health management

• Solutions can• Be farm-specific• Be production system specific• Be context-specific• Evolve

• Knowledge dissemination evolves from disseminatingsolutions to also disseminating methods to identify thebest solution in a specific context for a specific farm

From external motivation towards internalmotivation

• Thematic network = learning network• People show more positive learning outcomes whenthey start feeling more and more internally motivated

• A learning network should create circumstances thatsupport internal motivation

• Pilot supporting mechanisms for advisory and transfer of technology

• Stress additional benefits such as welfare and economicperformance

• Without necessarily giving up external motivators

From focus on farmers to focus on the entirecomplex of actors and factors

• All stakeholders involved have to participate• Farmers• Veterinarian• Advisors• Suppliers• Buyers• Government

• Designing solutions, disseminating solutions, creatingenabling environment, creating alternatives, changingmind-set is done in multi-actor environment

DISARM: how do we work?

www.disarmproject.eu@ProjectDisarm

Farm Animal Health Teams for healthy livestock farming and

prudent use of antibioticsDISARM EU stakeholder event

dr. ir. Frederik Leen, ILVO

Source: ZLTO

Feed advisorFarmer Coach/Facilitator

Veterinarian

Farm-specificAction Plan

Source: ZLTO

• Why promoting this approach?• How we want to promote it?• Importance of coaching?• Promising results from research and practice

Why promoting the approach?

We believe:• Sustainable livestock farming ≠ using antibiotics as cover-up

for suboptimal managementBut

• Reducing the need for AB is more than just cutting its use!It requires:

• A knowledge-intensive process • Rethinking farm specific management practices and farm

organization• Break routines and change behavior• Change perceptions and presumptions

Why promoting the approach?

• Farm improvement can benefit because of:

• Different sources of knowledge of farmer, vet, (feed)advisor• Synergy in team discussion has added value over individual

consultations• Shared ownership, motivation and accountability from

teamwork• Coherent and streamlined advice in a tailor-made action plan• Support from other team members for the farmer in making

the change

How to promote FHT’s in DISARM

Strategic communication, dissemination and exploitation of results

Assess strategies and technologies to

reduce antibiotic resistance on farms

40 on-farm case studies will promote collaborative

working of farm health teams to develop action

plans to reduce antibiotic use

Best Practice Abstracts

VideosCross-border

exchangeBest Practice

GuidesWeb and Social Media content

Events and Workshops

Policy and Research Reports

Community of Practice

State of the Art Multi-Actor Farm Health Plans

40 Farm Health Teams in Europe

Farm Health Plan

Farmer Feed Advisor

Veterinarian

• Improve Farm Health Status• Improve Farm Performance• Reduce potential for AB resistance on farm

State of Art

Best practice

examples

30: case studies reports

Output

On-line FHT toolbox

40 farms:5 per country

Video testimonies

Workshops

Course of actions

Farm intake

Self-assessment of farm by team

2nd FHT-meeting: Mid-term evaluation

1st FHT-meetings:

Implementationof action plan

Monthlyfollow-up by

Monthly team meeting

without coach

Monthlyfollow-up by

3nd FHT-meeting: Final evaluation

(Inter)nationalknowledgeexchange

Diagnosis Action plan

Monthly team meeting

without coach

Knowledge exchange

International knowledgeexchange

3 day cross visits

Stable schools Stable schools

Knowledge exchange between pilot farms and demo-events forother farmers and vets

Focus on coaching in DISARM

Why focus on coaching?

• Coaching: • Helping a person make a change in the desired direction in a

desirable manner• Bring out the potential to improve performance • Building awareness• Motivate choices • Leads to change

• ABU reduction is demanding on farmer:• Sustain management changes• Sustain behavioural changes

• ABU reduction tailored to specific context of the farm

Need for coaching?

• Dr. M Postma at AACTING• Coaching needed to:

• change perception, • create awareness • create desire, • build knowledge and ability• reinforce change of ABU

practices

Multi-Actor Farm health plans

Gemma van den Berg Coach at ZLTO - The Netherlands

Introduction

Gemma van den BergFarmers coach at ZLTO

Southern Agriculture andHorticulture Organization in The South of the Netherlands

The people

The people, sources of motivition

The people, role in entrepreneurialprocess

Brainmap, to choose actions

What are we talking

about?

Topic X,Y,Z

TopicX,Y,Z

Topic X,Y,Z

TopicX,Y,Z

Choose

PDCA, plan, do, check, act (adjust)

CControle

To plan

SpecificMeasurableAcceptableRealisticTime-line

To act To control

Questions?

Thank you for your attention!

Successes of Farm Specific action plans

Testimony from practice

• Pig Farmer Bart Vergote

Successes of farm specific health plans for AB reduction

Success of farm specific action plans for AB reduction

Conclusion: Improving biosecurity and vaccination strategies with assistance of a coach can lower ABU without harming farm economic performance

Herd specific actions for lower AMU can be profitable and economic performance was more sensitive to change in ADG and FCR than direct costs of interventions

€ pe

• Reduction of AMU without adverse effects on animal health and productivity is possible

Prerequisites:

• Adjusting management practices in a team effort. • Fostering good collaboration among farmer,

veterinarian, and feed adviser• Focusing on limited number of objectives to

ensure success of the animal health planning program and antimicrobial use.

Data to guide and motivate farmers:

PeHeStat as an example in livestock

Drs. Tommy Van Limbergen

Tommy@pehestat.beGSM 0032 494 82 30 41

We identified three main priorities for data-processing:

1) Poultry industry:• Poultry farmer: Improvement of production process• Stakeholders: Benchmarking

2) Veterinary guidance programs Investigating trends / adaptation of vaccination protocols / …

3) Research: • Collaboration in projects

• Evaluation new products or new strategies• Evaluation of epidemiological importance of current poultry

diseases61

Introduction

PEHESTAT

• INTEGRATED DATABASE

Management + Housing

Health

PerformancePoultry Industry Poultry Research

FARM/INTEGRATOR REPORTS

BENCHMARKING

FIELD TRIALS

INPUT OUTPUTPROCESS AND ANALYSIS

OUR APPROACH:

PEHESTAT – Impact on our market?

• Poultry farms linked to PEHESTAT in Belgium:

• Broilers (67% of farms)

• Laying hens (91% of farms)

• Breeders (layers and broilers)

Belgium => mainly non-integrated farms!

The importance of data

• AB-usage during 2011 – 2019:

Average farm size= 65 767 broilers

Reduction in AB usage(based on 2011)

2012 17,65% 2013 21,40% 2014 27,72% 2015 26,35% 2019 (Q1-Q3) 51,20% (based on 4633 flocks)

PeHeStat – the use of data-analysis in poultry

• Two priorities:

1) Poultry industry:• Poultry farmer: Improvement of production process

Decrease of antimicrobial usage by specific advices

• Stakeholders: Benchmarking

2) Research: • Collaboration in projects

• Partner / subcontractor• Field trials

PeHeStat - activities

1) Poultry industry:

- Complete production process

- Identification of potential problems

- General audit / specific problems

- To the point farm-specific advice

PeHeStat – farm report

Housing

Health

Perfomance

Management

1) Poultry industry: Farm report=> D4: decreased water-intake in all houses on purpose ? (management)

1) Poultry industry: Farm report

⇒ Issues just before thinning (D31 - 34): = extra † 2017 => 827 birdsVentilation / Density / Health / Heat stress / …. = +/- 1600 €

⇒ Adaptation in light management of laying hens:

⇒ Difference between the curves = 8,26 eggs per hen= 347 036 eggs extra production= 22 106 € (extra egg value) extra net margin = 6 377 €

⇒ Layer integration: advice on rearing flocks

⇒ Layer integration: Feed intake(Vaccination program?)

Controle of enterical problems : coccidiosis

Alternative approach:

• Coccidiosis vaccination in a rotation scheme with anticoccidials

2 flocksclean- up

3 flocksvaccinated

5 flocksnon

vaccinated

Non vaccinated

Vaccination

Controle of enterical problems: coccidiosis

What type of farms do we vaccinate?

1. Farms with bad technical results

2. Farms with clinical problems of coccidiosis:E. acervulina / E. maxima / E. tenella

Controle of enterical problems: coccidiosis

Effects of cox vaccination:

– Improved gut integrity

– Reduced usage of antibiotics for enterical problems=> 30,43% less antibiotics (of which 24,45% β-lactam)

‒ No difference in AB usage for other indications(e.g. locomotory)

Risk factor analysis for poor health, welfare and performance inpoultry.

- 7 EU member states

- 358 conventional broiler farms

- 77%: only activity = broiler production

- 78,5%: Part of a quality assurance scheme

- 51,8%: Part of an integrated system

CONCLUSIONS META-ANALYSIS

Clear risk factors were found:

Housing: floor quality; ventilation; type of light at loading and intensity of light

Infectious: E.coli; coccidiosis and dysbacteriosis

Management: level of professionalism; feed withdrawal time and light adaptations

Adaptations of management, housing and health programs are beneficial

Overall conclusions

Data-collection is of high importance for a poultry vet andfarmer:

To identify potential factors to improve poultry health To adapt veterinary protocols and prevent disease To help the poultry industry in decreasing AB usage

The interpretation of the collected data is crucial and thepoultry vet plays a key role!

Thank you for your attention!

Tommy@pehestat.be

Take homes on Farm Health Teams

• Farm Health Teams are promising to: • improve general farm animal health• improve biosecurity and disease prevention• reduce the need for antibiotics in livestock farming

• Its power lies in: • Synergy between knowledge and expertise• Coherent advice• Coaching and supporting the farmer to make necessary

changes• Follow the updates on our case studies through ourwebsite and social media channels!

Insert your logo here

Thanks for your attention!

Credits for noun project icons• Farm by Ferran Brown• Strategic plan by Prosymbols• Personal Assessment Prosymbols• Evaluation Creative Mahira• Travel by • Evaluation by Eucalyp

• Farmer Livestock by Gan Khoon Lay • Knowledge by Nithinan Tatah• Question by Saifurrijal• Salesman by Kirby Wu• Grains Silo by Ben Davis• Internet by Adrien Coquet• Meeting by Angelina • Workshop by Nithinan Tatah• Co-creation by Bruno Castro• Diagnosis by Daily PM• Search by Luis Prado

DISARM The Community of practice (CoP)

Alizée Chouteau, Idele

What is the CoP ?

Forty on-farm case studies will test

collaborative working between multi-actor

teams to develop farm plans to reduce antibiotic

VideosCross-border

A growing Community !With various profiles (farmers, vet, researchers, members of the

industry…)

Objective : 600 members all across Europe in M36 (200 for now)

What is the CoP ?

To catalyse the exchange, co-creation and dissemination

of research ready for

practice, innovations and

strategiesfor healthier animals and more prudent use of AB

What is the CoP ?

Ten topics of discussion choosen by the members :

1- Internal Biosecurity 2- External Biosecurity3- Optimal housing for healthy and less stressed animals 4- Precision livestock technologies for early disease detection5- Potential of breeding and genetics for robust and resilient animals6- Control of drinking water point quality7- Young stock management & rearing – focus on the first weeks of life8- Vaccination protocols9- Antibiotic management in extensive livestock systems10- Improving animal health by using adapted feeding/ watering and feed additives

What is the CoP ?

The online CoP is hosted on Facebook

Easy to join and to useTranslation tool integrated

No new account needed if you are already using facebook

A monthly review available on the websitefor the people who do not use Facebook

Knowledge exchange and knowledge co-creation

What will the CoP be used for ?

Knowledge exchange and knowledge co-creation

Activities submitted by the consortium members

#Study Monday#Question Tuesday#Story Wednesday

#Make it Easy Thursday#Free Friday

#Fun Week End

Ideas, Innovation and good practices shared by the members

Stimulate activityFacilitate discussion

How does it work ?

If you want to join, you will need to :

• Complete an online subscription form (Name, job, sector, country) : used for validation of the moderationrules, and monitoring of the recruitment

• Make a request on the Facebook Group

• You will be added within a few days by an administrator

• You can start sharing and commenting with the other members !

How does it work ?

Members :Share new ideasShare good practicesAsk questionsComments and give their opinions

Facilitators and moderatorsGive experts answer

Take note of good ideas to develop during the projectSummarize discussions for dissemination outside of the CoP

What is the CoP ?

Forty on-farm case studies will test

collaborative working between multi-actor

teams to develop farm plans to reduce antibiotic

VideosCross-border

Join & follow us! Follow us:

www.disarmproject.eu

@projectdisarm

Disarm thematic network

Disarm Project

Join us: DISARM Community of Practice

Credits for noun project icons

• Farmer Livestock by Gan Khoon Lay • Knowledge by Nithinan Tatah• Question by Saifurrijal• Salesman by Kirby Wu• Grains Silo by Ben Davis• Internet by Adrien Coquet• Meeting by Angelina • Workshop by Nithinan Tatah

Coordinated by Partners

Insert your contact information here

DISARM: a short introduction...DISARM: a H2020 thematic network • Thematic networks = compiling...

Documents

23452025 Lincoln Continental 1995 2002 Without Ride Light Disarm Instructions

CENTRALE ANTIFURTO WIRELESS CON COMBINATORE … 8003 definitiva.pdf · 9.4 ARM/DISARM via SMS 9.5 ARM/DISARM via chiamata 10 – CONFIGURAZIONE DEGLI OPZIONALI AGGIUNTIVI 10.1 –

Content Disarm and Reconstruction (CDR) Selection Guide

California's Attempts to Disarm

911 Disarm Finalreport

Fraudulent Documentation: Fraudsters’ Secret Weapon ... How to Disarm Them

Elite S Series Brochure.pdf · Features Apple & Android compatible, push notifications, activation history, virtual keypad, full arm/disarm, stay arm/disarm, sensor bypass function,

Disarm the Dark | Abolition in Our Bones

Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps Thematic Accuracy

Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol3365/sitr1_sepls.pdf · IV Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review vol.1 Table of contents Foreword Ⅵ Preface Ⅷ Chapter 1.Enhancing knowledge

CATALOGUE - leading security products · (arm/disarm in all part, events, trouble, outputs, inputs ... no configuration required • ARM and DISARM in all ... USER CODE / TAG / REMOTE

Lincoln Continental 1988 - 2002 Without Ride Light Disarm Instructions

Laughing at Death: The evolution of humor to disarm fundamentalism

Chestnut leaf extracts disarm MRSA - 2015

03 gpi disarm nether v4 - Greenpeace

Thematic analysis · Thematic analysis Aquaculture 7 Low yields (

A failure to disarm

2nd Thematic Conference on Knowledge Commons - Call for papers

«Academy of Plato, Paths to Knowledge» - · PDF fileΠλάτων 4. Academy of Plato: development of knowledge and innovative ideas This thematic area will embrace a whole range

Disarm domestic violence