View
228
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Stevenson catalogue 53, 2010
Citation preview
dineo seshee bopape
the eclipse will not be visible to the naked eye
MICHAEL STEVENSON
29 JULY – 4 SEPTEMBER 2010
dineo seshee bopape
the eclipse will not be visible to the naked eye
feelin cosmic
grass green/sky blue
god dear (part 1)
f for flowers
flowers for modjadji
immaterial
flower blur
eartha kitt
they went that way
yoh what’s this now and
sparkle tree
flowers for tv
green treeeee flowr
light beautiful
build a house.
garden flowers2
crystal night
tree sky
blue
HOW deep is your love
chickens
DSCN3664
flower1
wine glass flowers
flowers22
garden
WINDO GARDEN
xiluva
a ke itsi kits
tree string
bright light
cuts
eclipsed
elephant ears
flower garden
flower shop
tree night
leaves
green tree
green treeeee
ground
killer night
leavezz
my my
pine tree w sky
savannah park
sky sea
sky tress
string tree light at bottom
SV400026
tent in grass
tree in blu
treees sky
queen of necklace sketch II in 3 parts
ge ba ba nea
something special
winnie’s lace
alter
ke tsa diphoofolo tsa go hlasela pelo
2
3
sparkle tree, flower garden, wine
glass flowers, flowers for tv, queen
of necklace sketch II part 3, tree sky
4
5
f for flowers, immaterial, flowers for modjadji
6
7
god dear (part 1), queen of necklace sketch II part 2 and 3
8
9
10
queen of necklace sketch II part 1, night tree,
garden flowers2, eartha kitt, immaterial
11
grass green/sky blue, flower, blue, flowers for modjadji, eartha kitt
12
13
14
green treeeee flowr, alter, garden
flowers2, eartha kitt, flower blur, tent
in grass, blue, flower garden, sky sea
15
bright light, killer night, pine tree w sky
16
17
18
19
queen of necklace sketch II part 2, crystal night
20
21
22
a ke itsi kits, green treeeee, queen of necklace sketch II part 1
23
something special, ge ba ba nea,
queen of necklace sketch II part 3
24
25
feelin cosmic, winnie’s lace
26
27
the eclipse will not be visible to the naked eye
28
29
savannah park, light beautiful, they went that way,
queen of necklace sketch II part 3, ge ba ba nea,
grass green/sky blue, tree in blu
30
My work is a negotiation of love, hate, mistakes, intentions, tensions, passion, intensity, boredom
and frustrations. I converse with today and yesterday, forever, as they negotiate spaces in
consciousness. The result of this is almost always fragmentary/fragmented. – Dineo Seshee
Bopape, ‘About my work…’, 2004
Dineo Seshee Bopape likes things – o rata dilo – uthanda izinto. This liking of things or
‘thingness’ is not the same as being easily excited by fads of the moment. If the infamous
adjective ‘tjatjarag’ were without the negative connotation, referring to one who is excitable,
hyperactive and over-zealous in an annoying way, I would use it to describe Bopape’s approach
to her visual collages.
Bopape’s practice defies categorisation. It is in place all over the place, obsessively, passionately,
intensely… Her installations are loaded with what she refers to as ‘effects’ – something similar
to perfumes (like Chanel No 5) worn to match a certain mood, day or season. Her obsessions
are seldom located within one recognisable space, time or zone. They are temporal and are
not to be distanced from life itself, the general ways of doing things – cooking, loving, dressing,
etc. As she has remarked, ‘real life requires one to perform many adjectives… I am interested
in objects performing passively… alluding in a very scattered way to disparate things somehow
dancing their colours, textures, thingness with other things… and their thingnesses too.’1
Bopape collides things, making them perform a multitude of (temporal) possibilities out in the
open. Her installations are like infinite life and spatial choices, a gathering of objects that play
against each other and thus continuously construct and dismantle each other’s narratives.
the personal effects of dineo bopape
Gabi Ngcobo
1 Bopape in an interview with Natalie
Hegert, http://www.artslant.com/ny/
artists/rackroom/57689
and other references
We have unexpectedly arrived at quite an interesting idea of the object and objectivity.
Activating the thing means perhaps to create an objective – not as a fact, but as the task of
unfreezing the forces congealed within the trash of history. – Hito Steyerl, ‘A Thing Like You and
Me’, e-flux journal # 15, 04/2010
31
Her digitally manipulated images bear what Hito Steyerl calls ‘the bruises of [their] crashes
with politics and violence’,2 bruises that are also located within the ‘imperfection’ of the image,
bearing the ‘traces of… rips and transfers’. They are her recollections of history, but we should
not forget that Bopape likes to remember things in her own way. Through ‘her’ images, still and
moving, she invites us to reconsider our yearning for a value based on authenticity.
Drawn from the artist’s statements over six years, the following critical points – accompanied
by passages from recent and historical texts – illuminate the location of Bopape’s ‘effects’.
Effect # 1 (organs without bodies)
in the ‘beginning’ of my practice i was thinking a lot about baggage, historical, social, personal...
the weight of it all became too much but the shape of it i was still interested in... plastic bags/
bubbles, balloons...
that balloons are filled with nothing
that they fill a shape and some space...
perhaps it is the trace of the baggage that left its imprint on me
the trace of the trauma – turning an invisible yet present thing into nothing
trying to wipe it off, to dismantle it – yet there lies its trace
uncontainable in any shape: it is nothing
Effect #2 (the thing in itself)
i am interested in the idea of nothing, ‘it’s nothing’
thingness, and no thingness,
situations saturated with distortions, perhaps trauma: memory/time/distortion/holes that one
jumps through to go to the other side.
the thing is the central character of this narrative… there is a collision that happens, some type
of disco of effects, a disco within/of the affected object
saturated
‘However, an object which isn’t an object is not nothing. One becomes obsessed by its
immanence, its void, to trace the mark of this void, and within the limits of indifference to
play the game according to the mysterious rules of indifference.’ – Jean Baudrillard, ‘Objects,
Images, and the Possibilities of Aesthetic Illusion’, 1997
2 Hito Steyerl, ‘A Thing Like You and
Me’ in e-flux journal #15, 04/2010
32
Perhaps the thing is how to make a story, one coherent story,
How to narrativise an event
Events that are somehow free of the historic
That have not yet been through the historicization process, or are in the midst of being
historicized – made to a particular logic
Effect # 3 (no event, no document, no history)
If the work is the event,
How does one document it after?
How is it historicized?
And which version is the true depiction of the event -
Is it valid now to document installations in black and white?
Or to manipulate the pics?
But what if the pics are bad? I am a bad photographer ie I cannot photograph things ‘as they are’
but I am more able to edit them how I remember them and how I would like to memorise them
Effect # 4 (the dematerialisation of an event [object/time])
i am interested in a dematerialisation of an event,
the politic of making an event, of framing time, organising things to form a particular sense
there is some sort of a decay of a linearity
go swele dikota, go shetje melora
(the firewood has burned, all that’s left are the ashes)
to displace history. memory. a fantasy. the story...
‘The poor image is a rag or a rip; an AVI or a JPEG, a lumpen proletarian in the class
society of appearances, ranked and valued according to its resolution. The poor image has
been uploaded, downloaded, shared, reformatted, and reedited. It transforms quality into
accessibility, exhibition value into cult value, films into clips, contemplation into distraction. The
image is liberated from the vaults of cinemas and archives and thrust into digital uncertainty, at
the expense of its own substance. The poor image tends towards abstraction: it is a visual idea
in its very becoming.’ – Hito Steyerl, ‘In Defense of the Poor Image’, e-flux journal # 10, 11/2009)
33
to wobble the frame and to elasticate an event.
Effect # 5 (feelin cosmic is…)
…space.
which is one of my primary concerns especially in the videos and some of the more recent
studio investigations... visual space and the space beyond the visual, digital space, political
space, fantasy space/the space of the intangible, the space of beauty (utopia and politics of
beauty), the metaphysical... the space of memory, space occupied by images...
i am interested in the space within video, if there is space within the virtual – how deep does it
go? how far can a sound recede or an image, how much further can the real be? perhaps it is
also a question of metaphysics... and trying to draw a type of timeline
Effect # 6 (the door to the other side)
the portal, zoom lens, pipe, tunnel, the peephole, the lens, unconditional saturation, a disco
of effects… there is nothing, only effect and affectation, the flower could be anything – but it
is also particular, a character (substance of the things not seen), there is the romance of the
story and its origins, its co-ordinates seem to not coincide, lacking THE romance to make it real.
perhaps what makes it real is its effects, its trace, its mirror. it’s about space, the depth of field,
the distance between here and there, this and that time, the space within a mirror
once upon a time the first people beginning a tale, a narrative/story – implying that there is a
middle and an end but what do they call each other?
an echo immersed in the sieve
Effect # 7 (the space of memory)
the space of memory, space occupied by images...
and how do objects function within a space – the materiality of space: the space of memory
and of the haptic digital?
‘For years people have been concerned with what goes on inside the frame. Maybe there’s
something going on outside the frame that could be considered an artistic idea.’
– Robert Barry, 1968
34
i set up situations within which the objects are ‘made’ to perform – poetically in sight of each
other – and also in which an event in memory is re-performed in the present, devoid from
original context.
together with the videos, they collectively produce a site for a disrupted narrative, an
orchestral discordant mess/harmony of small stories or fragments of a language that would
thereafter be dismantled.
………………………………………
i keep thinking a lot about the shembe people’s aesthetics... the white painted rocks used in
both urban and rural areas... but most especially in the urban areas, to temporarily demarcate
a space that would function as a spiritual zone... a temporary church... an ephemeral space,
bubble... arena – within which that spiritual event/activity is to take place...
i guess it is like constructing a tent.
‘Finally I can tell generations and generations
‘That SHEMBE is the way’
– Lucky Dube, Shembe is the Way
‘William James thought that a necessary ingredient of memory is “the revival in the mind of
an image or copy of the original event” (Principles of Psychology, I, 649). And Russell says:
“Memory demands an image” (The Analysis of Mind, p186). Beyond the general agreement of
memory theorists on the necessity for an image, some of them have held that “the present
mental occurrence in remembering” must contain additional components. Certain feelings
must accompany or characterize the image. One can deduce the nature of the feeling from the
problems that have to be solved. For example, if I have an image is it an image of something I
remember? Should I refer the image to the past or the future? Why should I give it one reference
rather than another? Now if there were such “a feeling of pastness” it would, apparently, solve
the problem. For if that feeling should accompany an image then I shall refer the image to the
past; if not, not.’ – Norman Malcolm, ‘Memory and Representation’ in Noûs, Vol 4, Feb 1970
Gabi Ngcobo is an independent curator, writer and artist
35
Catalogue no 53 August 2010
Front cover feelin cosmic
MICHAEL STEVENSON
Buchanan Building
160 Sir Lowry Road
Woodstock 7925
Cape Town, South Africa
Tel +27 (0)21 462 1500
info@michaelstevenson.com
www.michaelstevenson.com
Editor Sophie Perryer
Design Gabrielle Guy
Photography Mario Todeschini
Printing Hansa Print, Cape Town
Dineo Seshee Bopape was born in 1981 in Polokwane, South Africa. She is a graduate of the
Durban Institute of Technology (2004) and De Ateliers in Amsterdam (2007), and completed an
MFA with Columbia University, New York, in May 2010. She was the winner of the 2008 MTN New
Contemporaries Award. She was one of two African artists included on The Generational: Younger
than Jesus, the first triennial exhibition of the New Museum in New York (2009). She has held solo
exhibitions at the KZNSA Gallery, Durban (2005 and 2008); Mart House Gallery in Amsterdam
(2007 and 2009); and the Thami Mnyele Studio, Amsterdam (2008). Recent group shows include
Siren at Anna Kustera Gallery, New York (2010); PASS-AGES: references & footnotes at the old Pass
Office in Johannesburg (2010); Ampersand at Daimler Contemporary, Berlin (2010); Act IX: Let Us
Compare Mythologies at Witte de With, Rotterdam (2010); Life Less Ordinary: Performance and
display in South African art at the Fotogallery in Cardiff, Wales, and Djanogly Gallery, Nottingham,
UK (2009 and 2010); Dada South? at the Iziko South African National Gallery, Cape Town
(2009); Rebelle: Art and Feminism 1969-2009 at the Museum voor Moderne Kunst Arnhem, The
Netherlands (2009); Beauty and Pleasure in South African Contemporary Art at The Stenersen
Museum, Oslo (2009); and Black Womanhood: Images, icons, and ideologies of the African body,
Davis Museum, Wellesley College, MA, USA (2008). She has previously exhibited at Michael
Stevenson on the group shows In the Making: Materials and process (2005); Disguise: The art of
attracting and deflecting attention (2008); and Summer 2009/10: Projects.
Artist’s acknowledgments:
mama le papa
daniel bozhkov, fia, jon k.+ kara for insights*
+the dreammakers/
joan legalamitlwa, joost bosland, andrew da conceicao, petros sethoa and all at
michael stevenson
Works:
the eclipse will not be visible to the naked eye, 2010, installation including digital videos (feelin
cosmic, 2008, 1 min 34 sec, sound; f for flowers, 2010, 1 min, sound; grass green/sky blue, 2008, 6
min 52 sec, sound; god dear [part 1], 2009, 4 min 15 sec, sound); digital drawings (lightjet prints on
metallic paper, various dimensions); sculptures (queen of necklace sketch II in 3 parts, something
special, 2010, mixed media, various dimensions); wall collage (alter, 2010, mixed media, 240 x 428 x
26 cm); and painting (ke tsa diphoofolo tsa go hlasela pelo, 2010, acrylic on board, 90 x 180cm)
the eclipse will not be visible to the naked eye, 2009, SD digital video, 11 min 38 sec, sound
36
MICHAEL STEVENSON
Recommended