View
2
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Design of steel piles for integral abutment bridges using Eurocodes
Hans Pétursson
ABSTRACT
Integral Abutment Bridges are becoming more popular in Europe, but the traditions differ from country to country. This leads to different technical solutions for the same problem in each country.
In this paper some of the different solutions that are used in Europe are presented. The Eurocodes are set of technical rules for the structural design of construction works. Since 2010 the
Eurocodes are mandatory for specification of public works and are intended to be the standard used in all the EU zone for the design of construction works. There are no special rules for bridges with integral abutments in the Eurocodes for integral abutment bridges. It is up to the designer to come up with a design that complies with the rules in the Eurocodes that are common with other type of bridges. In this paper some of the aspects of designing piles according to Eurocodes are described.
_______________ Hans Pétursson, Steel Bridges Specialist, Swedish Transport Administration, Röda vägen 1,SE-781 89 Borlänge, Sweden
180
INTR
Pile t
Estatestowar
TWork(Collworkfurthe
Dapprothat ththe fu
Itcountthe st
Pto marow (into atheir Kingdbridgprobl
Fig
Dtheir piles.bridgdesigthe so
Tof pilabutmimpac
RODUCTIO
types used i
European exps in USA, burds making I
To broaden kshop on Inin et. al. 200
kshop. The ger the unders
During the woach to the dheir designsuture. t should be tries. There atarting point
Pile foundatioany USA age(Maruri et. aand out of thvery naturedom, howev
ge and the alems related
gure1. Exampl
Despite the suFIAB. The E In most Eu
ge must be vgners typicalloil supportin
The design phle. Some coment translatct of the pil
ON
in Europe
perience withut what expeIAB a largerthe knowle
ntegral Abut06). Designegoal of the wstanding of t
workshop, itdesign of IABs were succe
pointed ouare few stant from whichons are not aency require
al. 2005) on the soil while e, restrain thver, spread foapproach pato the restra
le of an Integr
uccess in theEuropean Suuropean cou
verified by caly create a co
ng the pile alhilosophy vaountries strivtion and rotales on the o
h integral aberience has br percentageedge base tment Bridgers and reseaworkshop wthe design, ct became clB. In spite ofessful and sta
ut that integndards yet. Th engineers ialways requiements. Manthe belief thaalso permitt
he rotation footings are tavement wiained abutm
ral Abutment
e UK, most Eurvey indicauntries, empalculations. omputer finilong its lengaries betweeve to make ation while
overall struct
butment bridbeen gainede of all newlyfor IAB de
ges was heldarchers from was to share constructionear that eacf the differenated that the
gral abutmenhe experiencin Europe apired in Euro
ny US agencat the single tting rotationof the abut
the preferredill settle equent rotations
on Spread Foo
European coates that desiirical designAlthough thite element m
gth, as well aen different c
the piles stothers chooture. For ex
dges (IAB) isd has been poy constructeesign and cd in Stockhoeight differethe experie
n, and maintech country rnt viewpointey would be
nts are still ces from othpply the conpe for FIAB
cies require trow permits
n of the abuttment stem d foundationually. Theres.
oting Used in
ountries use igners accoun is not permhere are no rmodel usingas the fillingcountries andtiff to resist ose slender pxample, Eng
s significantositive. As a
ed bridges acconstructionolm, Swedeent countriences of the enance of IArepresented ts, each repreconstructing
quite new her bridge foncept of integB. This is in dthe piles to bs the abutmetment stem. (see Figure
n for FIAB oe have not
the United K
a pile suppount for the bemitted, and requirementsg theoretical g behind the bd that is reflethe stresses
piles in an atgland, Irelan
tly less than ia result, the cross Europen, the Internen in May os participateparticipants
AB. a slightly desentative ing additional
in most Euoundations tygral abutmendirect contra
be placed in ent stem to trSpread footie 1). In the on the belief been any r
Kingdom (Iles 2
orted foundaending forcethe functions for the prosprings to reback wall. ected in theirs induced frttempt to lesd, and Swed
in some trend is e. national of 2006 ed in the s and to
different ndicated l IAB in
uropean ypes are nts. adiction a single ranslate ings, by United
f that the reported
2005)
ation for es in the n of the ocedure, epresent
r choice rom the ssen the den use
181
sleevsuperalongsoil toaccom
TXC
The Xstressfuture
HH
wheremajorwith t
SS
diamewhen
LL
type uyearspipe pft. (1.Figurthe be
es around thrstructure trag a greater leo prevent themmodate the
The followinX-piles Cross-shapedX-shaped pises. This pilee.
H-pilesH-piles are ne more thanrity of their ithe strong ax
Small Diamemall diameteter pipe pil
n precise loca
Figu
Large DiameLarge diametused in Euros (Kerokoskipiles. These .2 m) in diamre 4. In this ceam ends, an
he piles to panslation. Thength of the pe buckling oe unsupporteg is a listing
d steel piles, iles are drive type is bein
not commonn 70% of Staintegral abuxis perpendieter Pipe Piter pipe pileles may be ation is imp
ure 2. Swedish
eter Steel Pter steel pipope. In Finlai 2006), andsteel pipe p
meter. If the case, the desnd the beam
prevent soil his theoreticapile, thereby
of the pile, thed length. g of the vario
also called ven verticallng discontin
nly used in Eate agencies utments. Wheicular to the iles es are not codrilled or drortant.
h Integral Abu
Pipe Piles pe piles filledand, more thad a large perciles are typicdistance to tsign usually
m’s mid-span
from restraally distributy reducing thhis method o
ous pile type
X-piles, havly and rotat
nued by the m
Europe. Thisreported (Men they use pbridge expa
ommonly usriven. In roc
utment Detail
d with reinfan 1,000 joincentage of thcally 2.25 ftthe bedrock
y assumes thn moments d
aining the frtes any longhe moment i
of constructio
es that are us
ve been usedted 45° in omanufacture
s practice is Maruri et. al.
piles, Englanansion.
ed for FIABcky soil, it i
l with Small D
forced concrntless bridgehem rest on. (700 mm) iis short, pip
hat the large decrease whi
ree bending itudinal traninduced in thon may requ
sed with FIA
d in integral order to miner, thus it wil
quite differ2005) using
nd and Irelan
B in Europe is best to pr
Diameter Steel
rete are the es have beenreinforced c
in diameter bpe piles can bdiameter pilile the end m
of the pilesnslation and rhe pile. Withuire stronger
AB in Europ
bridges in Snimize the bll not be use
rent from thg steel H-pilnd use steel
or the USAre-drill for th
l Pipe Piles
most commn built in theconcrete fillbut can be ube used as shles provide f
moments inc
s during rotation hout the piles to
pe:
Sweden. bending ed in the
he USA, les for a H-piles
A. Smallhe piles
mon pile last ten ed steel
up to 4.0 hown in fixity at rease.
182
CC
diamemomThe d
P
Figure
Cast-In-PlacCast-in-placeeter cast-in-
ments. An exadesired cons
FPrecast and
3. Finnish Br
ce Reinforcee concrete p-place piles ample can betraint could
igure 5. SketcPrestressed
ridge with Lar
Figure 4. S
ed Concretepiles are usare used to e seen in Figalso be obta
ch of German d Concrete P
rge Diameter S
hort pipe piles
e Piles sed in some
constrain egure 9. Theseained by usin
bridge with rePiles
Steel Pipe Pile
s on rock, Sw
e European end rotation e piles typicang wide spre
einforced cast
es During Con
weden
countries. Iand lower t
ally have a dead footings
t in-situ concre
nstruction
In Germanythe mid-spadiameter of 9s.
ete piles.
y, large an beam 900 mm.
183
Precast (PC) and prestressed (PS) concrete piles are not commonly used in Europe, with the exception of Sweden. In Sweden, PC/PS concrete piles are common in all bridge types, including short FIAB, due to their low cost and ready availability. In the USA, these pile types are typically only used for shorter span FIAB.
Steel Core Piles Although not common, steel core pipe piles have been used for FIAB in Europe. The pile
system consists of a cover pipe, injected concrete and a core steel pile. Drilling is performed down to the bedrock. The cover pipe is drilled 300-500 mm into the rock. When the cover pipe is placed in the hole the interior is rinsed and then injected with concrete. The steel core is then installed. After inspection and driving pile to refusal the pile is cut to the right length. A pressure distribution plate is then fit to the top of the pile. In this way the very slender steel pile can be used and the concrete stabilizes the pile from buckling. A few FIAB have been built in Sweden with steel core piles.
Figure 6. Sketch of steel core pile.
The Eurocodes
The Eurocodes are set of technical rules for the structural design of construction works. Since 2010 the Eurocodes are mandatory for specification of public works and are intended to be the standard used in all the EU zone for the design of construction works. The Eurocodes are published separate European Standards each section having a number e.g. EN 1990 Basis of structural design, EN 1991 Actions on structures, 1992 Design of Concrete Structures and EN 1993 Design of Steel Structures. There are 10 sections published and each section consists of several parts.
There are no specific parts of the Eurocodes that deals with integral abutments nor are there any specific rules in the different parts. It is up to the designer to come up with a design that complies with the rules in the Eurocodes that are common with other type of bridges. The parts of the Eurocodes that the designer needs to look into when designing piles for integral abutment bridges are: EN 1990 Basis of structural design EN 1991-2Actions on structures - Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges
184
EN 1991-5 Actions on structures - Part 1-5: General actions - Thermal actions EN 1993-2 Steel bridges EN 1993-5 Design of steel structures - Part 5: Piling EN 1997-1 Geotechnical design - Part 1: General rules
Design of piles
Philosophies
Integral abutment bridges may be generally designed based on two different concepts. 1. Low flexural stiffness of piles / low degree of restraint
If the integral abutment is supported by one row of flexible piles the superstructure can beanalyzed as a beam with simple hinged supports. 2. High flexural stiffness of piles / high degree of restraint
If the integral abutment is supported on stiffer piles or spread footing the rotation of thesuperstructure and to some extent the displacement will be restraint and a large support moment will be distributed to the superstructure. This means that the connection between the abutment and the superstructure needs to be stronger and more robust but the field moment of the superstructure is somewhat shifted to the support and a more slender superstructure can be constructed. If the piles are relatively short and stiff enough the structure act like a frame and the soil-bridge interaction is not as vital as in bridges with more slender piles. This type is not discussed further in this paper.
Loading
Bridge loading is the same for integral abutment bridges as other bridges. The difference is that some loads cause forced displacement and rotations at the top of the piles and this gives unwanted strains in the piles. The stiffness behind the abutment reliefs these strains to some extent depending on confinement, water content and friction.
Thermal loads
Two types of temperature loads needs to be considered. First, a uniform temperature change which means that the abutment is displaced horizontally. The magnitude of the bridge movement depends on the mean temperature of the structure when the superstructure is locked to the abutments. Also uneven temperature distribution in the superstructure cause movements of the piles as the beam end rotates. The mean bridge temperature is dependent on the ambient air temperature, wind effect and solar radiation. Temperature gradients through the depth of the bridge beams generate secondary bending moments due to the fact that the centroid of the temperature distribution curve and the centroid of the cross-section of the bridge beams may not coincide. The maximum temperature differentials (with positive gradient) occurs when the concrete deck slab is exposed to sun radiation during the summer and winter, resulting in a concrete deck slab that is warmer than the steel beams. The minimum temperature differential (with negative gradient) occurs when the concrete deck slab is suddenly drenched with cold rain or snow, thus cooling the concrete deck slab at a faster rate than the steel beams. The rotation will also cause a horizontal displacement of the pile top if there is a vertical distance between the centre of gravity of the composite cross-section and lower edge of the abutment wall where the pile is clamped.
185
Thampligivesand wconstdaily valuaestimalso. the m
F
Brfor thcool fType maximtemperange
TbeingTe,maxbecom52 yeconse
he temperatuitude, but a
s 120 stress cwill induce tant and the wtemperature
able to havemation is mos
In Eurocodemaximum an
Figure 7. Corre
ridge decks ahe purpose ofrom lighter 1: Steel decmum/and meratures for e of the unifo
The shade airg exceeded ox=36 ° C (Tmes 75° C. Aears is 56.6ervative.
ure of the brsmall numbcycles of ann365×120 =width of anne cycles. It
e models to stly based one EN 1991-1d minimum
elation betwee
are groupedf differentia
r bridge deckck, Type 2: C
minimum bridtype 2 whileorm bridge t
r temperaturof 0,02 or o
TRVFS ) anAs can be se
6° C (Mobe
ridge varies ber of cyclesnual tempera
= 43 800 strnual temperais not commestimate th
n the shade a1-5 (CEN 20uniform bri
en minimum/m
d in three diffating betweenks that are mComposite ddge temperae the range itemperature
TN =
re used for donce in 50 ynd Te,min =-2een in Tablerg et. al. 20
continuousl. A bridge liature variatioress cycles. ature cycles mon to meae bridge temair temperatu003) a diagraidge tempera
maximum sha
fferent groupn massive br
more rapidly deck and typatures are 5°is larger for T:
=Te,max –Te,m
design is a tyears. As an 29 ° C and e 4 the maxim002) and th
ly. The seasoifetime is esons. The daiThe width are (of cour
asure the brimperature frure but theream like in Fature compo
ade air temper
ps in Eurocoridge deck thheated and c
pe 3: Concret° C above thType 1 and
min
temperature example vathe range o
mum annualhe design va
onal variatiostimated to bily variationof temperat
rse) larger thidge temperrom ambiene are more soFigure 1 is pronents Te,min
ature and mea
ode EN 1991hat take longcooled. The te deck. As s
he corresponsmaller for T
with the analue for Stoof the bridgl temperaturalues can th
ons have thebe 120 yearsns are more fture cycles han the widtrature and itnt temperatuophisticated resented to eand Te,max.
an bridge temp
1-1-5 (CEN 2ger time to hthree group
seen in Figunding shade aType 3. The
nnual probabckholm, Sw
ge temperature width for thus be rega
e largest s, which frequent are not
th of the t is thus ure. The
models estimate
perature.
2003) heat and ps are ure 1 the air
e overall
(1)
bility of weden is ure thus the past
arded as
186
MaxMin.Mean
Media
Inon daMeascomp
Traff
Inpedesthe mtwo aroads
Load
Llane a
Para
Aresistand sreact
1Calcu2Calcu
TABLE
Tmax
. 35.4. -22.1n 10.5an 10.0
n Eurocode Eaily temperasurements inposite bridge
ffic loads
n this paper ostrian bridge
most severe tradjustment fas. Only one l
d model 1
Load model 1according. E
meters of so
According ttance of a losupported bytion
ulated from maulated from dai
E Ⅰ. TEMPER
x T4 221 -25 40 4
EN 1991-1-5ature ranges n the UK (e as most we
only road bres are also coraffic expect
factors α andload model i
1 consist of tEach lane is
T
oil surroun
to the Eurung slender py a deforma
aximum and mily mean estim
RATURE MEA(M
Daily temp
min T2.4 25.5 -2
4.1 74.0 6
5 (CEN 200of 10° C wh
(Emerson 19ere about 25
ridges are coovered. For ted in practi
d β to adjust tis described
two axle loa3 m wide an
TABLE Ⅱ. L
ding the pil
ucodes (EC pile may be cable medium
minimum readinmations.
ASUREMENTMOBERG ET.peraturers
Tmean Δ28.3 223.9 7.1 6.9
03) the maximhich is 13% 977) showe% of the ann
onsidered, inroad bridges
ice on the mathe loads to here as it th
ads, Qik, and nd the distan
LOAD VALUE
les
1997-1 7.carried out um characteri
ngs.
TS IN STOCKH AL. 2002).
ΔTdaily Δ20.4 0.3 6.3 5.9
mum and miof the maxi
ed that the dnual.
n the Eurocos there are twain routes ofdifferences b
he only one t
a distributednce between
ES FOR THE T
7.3) “The using the theised by a ho
HOLM 1961-0
ΔTmean
14 0
1.7 1.3
inimum temimal annual daily tempe
odes railway wo load modf European cbetween couthat is used f
d load qik wiaxles is 1.20
TRAFFIC
calculation eory of a beaorizontal mo
01-01-2012-12
Annual tempechanges.
ΔT1 56.6 32
45.8 46.2
mperatures artemperature
erature widt
loads and lodels that repcountries. Thuntries and dfor pile desig
ith values in0 m.
of the traam loaded atodulus of su
2-31
erature .
T2
46.6 23.5 36.1 36.1
re based e width. ths in a
oads for presents here are
different gn.
n each
ansverse t the top ubgrade
187
Soil with cohesion (clay)
If the soil surrounding the soil is considered to be an elastic continuum with Young´s modulus E and Poisson´s ratio of 0.5 the lateral soil modulus, ku, can be derived e.g. according to Baguelin (1997). If the Young´s modulus is supposed to be E=50cu, where cu is the cohesion the lateral soil modulus can be written:
ku =k0cu/b, 157≤k0≤242 (2)
For long term loading the creep effect must be considered. This done approximately by reducing the lateral soil stiffness:
ku =50cu/b (3)
The pressure against the pile is described by the expression:
p=kuu (4)
Where u is the lateral displacement of the pile. The pressure p is limited to a value py that for drained conditions can be calculated by:
py=Nccu (5)
Where Nc is a constant that varies between 8-12 for deep soil layers (<3b) and decreases to 2 for layers closer to the surface. For short time loading Nc=9can be used and for long time loading the creep is considered by a lower value of Nc=6.
Cohesion-less soil (friction soil)
For cohesion-less soils there are no unambiguous expression that describes the relation between the lateral soil modulus and the strength parameter �´. The relationship between lateral displacement and soil pressure against the pile is therefor based on suggested empirical “p-y” curves based on experimental data. There are numerous suggestions on different “p-y” curves among them are Reese (1994). The “p-y” curves are un-linear and a soil model with linear curve based the initial slope of the “p-y” curve suggested by Reese et. al.(1994) is used here. The lateral soil modulus is half of the initial modulus according to Reese et. al.(1994) and is expressed as follows:
Ku=1/2ksz (6)
where ksis given in Table Ⅲ.
TABLE Ⅲ. VALUES FORTHE CONSTANT KsFOR LATERAL SOIL MODULUS ACCORDING TO REESE ET. AL. (2007) Water[MN/m3] Sand above water table [MN/m3]
Loose sand 5 7 Medium dense sand 16 24 Dense sand 34 61
188
For u
where
Mode
Tconnefull-sinelasload cnot pwith someand dpile.
Mode
Indisplais at tlateraThe pthe picross
Figu
Torder
un-drained co
e σ´vis the v
elling the pi
The connectection. Expescale modelsstic deformacycles. This
permissible useveral hun
ewhere betwdesign the pi
elling the pi
n the suggacements takthe upper paal soil modupile will behile capacity -section acc
ure 8. Three s
The procedurr effects is a
onditions the
vertical soil p
ile abutmen
tion betweeneriments at s of clampedations unders indicates thunder most cndred meter
ween rigidly file with norm
ile soil inter
gested analyke place neaart of the pileulus will behhave elastic u
is reached. cording to EN
stages for th
re to calculaiterative pro
e limit value
py=N�σ´v
pressure and
nt connectio
n the pile anLulea Univ
d piles demor strains six hat by permicurrent desirs of bridgfixed and pinmal force, d
raction
ytical modelar the pile heae. As soon ahave plastic until a plastTo reach th
N 1993-1-1.
he pile analyand la
ate the momeocess that is
e is calculate
v
d N� = 3Kp. Cr
on
nd the abutmversity of Tonstrated thatimes greateitting pile strgn codes), ie length. Cnned it is pradisplacement
l to design ad and thus t
as the limit vat further d
tic hinge is fhis state the p
ysis, low loadarge load at t
ents and shepreferable d
ed by:
reep is not con
ment can beTechnology at a steel piper than the yrains in exceintegral abut
Considering actical to cont and an ext
the pile itthe largest so
value, py, of tdisplacementformed sompile must be
d at the left, the right.
ear forces alodone with co
nsidered for fric
e modelled (Pétursson pe pile can ayield strain fess of the yitment bridgethat the fix
nsider the coternal mome
t is assumeoil pressure the soil prest of the pile ewhere alone ductile and
intermediat
ong the pile omputer prog
ction soils.
as fixed or et. al. 2013accommodafor several hield strain (wes could be xity of the onnection asent at the top
ed that the against the psure is obtaitop (see Fig
ng the pile ad belong to
t load in the
consideringgrams.
(7)
pinned 3) usingate large hundred which is erected pile is
s pinned p of the
largest pile also ined the gure 9).
and then Class 1
middle
g second
189
Initial imperfections and second order moments
When designing piles second order effects are taken into consideration. This is done by enlarging moment along the pile and is depending on the initial imperfections of the pile. The initial imperfection of the pile can be assumed according to Table 5.1 in EN 1993-1-1 and is:1/200
e0/lc=1/200 (8)
for steel pipe piles that are cold formed. For piles with H-profile the value is 1/300 for strong axis bending and 1/250 for weak axis bending.
Concluding remarks
This paper describes some of issues that have to be dealt with when designing steel piles for integral abutment bridges, but is far from complete. For a more comprehensive material about designing integral abutments according to Eurocodes the reader can look into the design guide from the INTAB project Feldman et. al 2010.
REFERENCES
Baugelin F, Frank R, Said Y. H., 1977, Theoretical study of lateral reaction mechanics of piles, Geotechnique, Vol. 3, pp. 405-434
Collin P., Veljkovic M., Petursson H., 2006, “International Workshop on Bridges with Integral Abutments”, Lulea University of Technology, ISSN: 1402-1536, ISRN: LTU-TR06/14-SE
EN 1990 // Eurocode - Basis of structural design. - Brussels : European Committee forStandardization (CEN), 2002.
EN 1990/A1 Eurocode - Basis of structural design, Annex A2: Application of brigdes(normative). - Brussels : European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2006.
EN 1991-1-5 // Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1-5: General actions – Thermalactions. - Brussels : European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2003.
EN 1991-2 // Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges. -Brussels : European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2003.
EN 1992-1-1 // Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rulesfor buildings. - Brussels : European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2004.
EN 1992-2 // Eurocode 2 - Design of concrete structures - Concrete bridges - Design anddetailing rules. - Brussels : European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2005.
EN 1993-1-1 // Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules forbuildings. - Brussels : European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2005.
EN 1993-1-5 // Eurocode 3 - Design of steel structures - Part 1-5: Plated structuralelements. - Brussels : European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2006.
EN 1993-1-9 // Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-9: Fatigue. - Brussels :European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2005.
EN 1993-2 // Eurocode 3 - Design of steel structures - Part 2: Steel Bridges. - Brussels :European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2006.
EN 1993-5 // Eurocode 3 - Design of steel structures - Part 5: Piling. - Brussels : EuropeanCommittee for Standardization (CEN), 2007.
EN 1994-2 // Eurocode 4 - Design of composite steen and concrete structures - Part 2:General rules and rules for bridges. - Brussels : European Committee for Standardization(CEN), 2005.
EN 1997-1 // Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design - Part 1: General rules. - Brussels : EuropeanCommittee for Standardization (CEN), 2005.
Feldmann, M., Naumes, J., Pak, D., Veljkovic, M., Eriksen, J., Hechler, O., et al.,2010, Design Guide. Aachen: RWTH AachenUniversity, Institut für Stahlbau, http://www.bridgedesign.de
190
Emerson, M. (1977). Temperature differences in bridges: basis ofdesign requirements, TRRL Laboratory Report 765, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, pp. 39.
Iles D., 2005, “Integral Steel Bridges: A Summary of Current Practice in Design and Construction”, SCI PublicationP340, p. 8
Kerokoski O., 2006, Soil Structure Interaction of Long Jointless Bridges with Integral Abutments, Tampere University of Technology, p.16
Maruri R., Petro S., 2005, Integral Abutments and Jointless Bridges (IAJB) 2004 Survey Summary, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)/Constructed Facilities Center (CFC) at West Virginia University
Pétursson H., Möller M., Collin P., 2013, Structural Engineering International, Vol. 23 , Number 3 ,pp. 278-284 Reese L. C., Cox W. R., Koop F. D., 1974, Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles in Sand, Offshore Technology
Conference, Houston, Paper. No. OTC 2080
191
Recommended