day2 session 6 2 Schandl How personal Information ... fileDr Leo Sauermann, Dr Bernhard Schandl...

Preview:

Citation preview

Dr Leo Sauermann, Dr Bernhard Schandl

founders of gnowsis.com

Thinking Tools

How Personal Information Management Changes our Work Life

Bernhard Schandl

Hardly remembers anything ...

Researcher, Teacher, Entrepreneur

University of Vienna, Gnowsis.com

bernhard.schandl@gnowsis.com

Introduction

Isn’t a (desktop) search engine enough?

search …. ok

4-15% use them

messy people less

perfect search engine is not enough

Teevan et al., The Perfect Search Engine Is Not Enough: A Study of Orienteering Behavior in Directed Search [CHI 2004]

Ofer Bergman et al., Improved Search Engines and Navigation Preference in Personal Information Management, ACM TOIS, 26(4), Sept. 2008

Documents

Private

Projects

CID

Research

Files

© www.flickr.com/photos/christmaswithak/3975103786 cc-by

The Broad Problem

Situation

Average knowledge worker

• ~20,000 files

• ~20,000 emails

• ~400 Calendar entries

• ~4.500web visits/month

• ~300 incoming emails/day

• Multiple Projects

• MS Sharepoint, MS Exchange, Workflow, Corporate Wiki

Behavior

• Tactics?

• Desktop Search only 4–15% >600 Win+Google and Mac users, 2008

• 57% of users keep bookmarks by sending themselves emails, "A Survey of Personal Information Management Practices", Robert Capra, 2009

• Strategy?

• Diskspace is cheaper than worktime.

• Things get in but not out.

Defining PIM

the organization and maintenance of personal

information collections in which information

items, such as paper documents, electronic

documents, email messages, web references,

handwritten notes, etc., are stored for later use

and repeated re-use

[Jones, 2007]

The situation today… organize

meeting in

Belfast …

… organize

meeting in

Belfast …

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Earth_seen_from_Apollo_17_trsp_back.jpg

PIM is not a new problem!

Vertical Filing Cabinet (1886)

PIM is not a new problem!

Bush’s Memex (1945)

PIM is not a new problem!

Nelson’s Hypertext Editing System (1967)

PIM is not a new problem!

Engelbart’s NLS (1968)

PIM is not a new problem!

Apple’s MessagePad (1997)

PIM Activities

PIM Key Activities

Filing

Finding Organizing

Filing

Goal

keeping information

“hotel receipt for accounting”

reminding and time management

“put receipt in “todo” folder”

Different Strategies

pilers

few folders, task oriented

“desktop/belfast/”

filers

many folders, structure oriented

projects/CID/trips/Belfast

multi-purpose

many more

strategies,

mixed in use

Finding

Goal

seeking something new

“Hotel in Belfast”

re-finding something old

“Receipt of hotel stay for

reimbursement”

Different Strategies

teleporting to the result

via search engine

“receipt belfast”

navigating and orienteering

Documents\project\Belfast\

receipt.pdf

preferred

approach

main concern

in PIM

designing the organisation

Ad hoc

“desktop! Default folder of

application! Email inbox!”

Planned

“reusable travel template for

tickets, receipts, photos ”

cleaning and reorganising

Regularly, sometimes, when the structure does not work, a new job,

got a new computer, deleting files, cleaning up

analyzing and optimizing

use of time, effectiveness in job, todo-management, project

management, e-learning, staying creative, staying up-to-date in a field

(Re-)Organizing

chances

for tools

competitive

advantage

examine others

and learn

How do people organize?

Reference Information Type Categories

Malone (1983) Paper documents neat, messy

Mackay (1988) Email prioritizers, archivers, requesters and

responders

Whittaker & Sidner

(1996)

Email no-filers, frequent-filers, spring-

cleaners

Bälter (1997) Email folderless cleaners, folderless spring-

cleaners, cleaners, spring-cleaners

Abrams, Baecker &

Chignell (1998)

Web bookmarks no-filer, creation-time filer, end-of-

session filer, sporadic filer

Gwizdka (2004) Email cleaners, keepers

Boardman & Sasse (2004) Documents, Email,

Web bookmarks

pro-organizing, organizing-neutral

Henderson, Personal Document Management Strategies (CHINZ2009)

Pilers, Filers, Structurers

Pilers Filers Structurers

Self-reported level of

organization

Not very

organized

Somewhat

organized

Somewhat / very

organized

Use of search Last resort Second choice Second choice

(sometimes first)

Preferred view List/Details List/Details Details/List

Number of top level

folders

Medium High Low

Number of top level files High High Low

Average depth Low Medium High

Henderson, Personal Document Management Strategies (CHINZ2009)

Getting interviewed

• Being interviewed on PIM influences PIM and can cause

subjects to pick up a strategy learned from the interviewer

• “The study had an immediate "self-auditing" influence on

the behavior of most participants… taking part in the

study caused them to […] plan future strategy changes.

[…] Overall the tool hasn’t done that much, its more the

conversations between me and you”

[Boardman+2004pimstudy]

PIM Tool Support

Standard PIM Tools

• PIM Suites

• Storage, but no management

• Information silos, but no PIM process support

• Data, but no context

• Does not connect

• Things go in but don’t come out

• Outlook, Lotus Notes, Mozilla Thunderbird/Sunbird,

Mail+iCal+AddressBook, Google Web Apps, ...

Standard PIM Tools

• Mind-mapping

• connect thoughts with information

• establish context

• weak in searching and navigating

• weak integration

• no information semantics

• MindManager, Freemind, TheBrain, ...

Standard PIM Tools

• Note-taking

• quick way to capture information

• helps pilers more than filers

• sometimes: support through auto-suggestion

• weak support for structured information (e.g.,

appointments)

• OneNote, Evernote, DevonThink, NoteScribe, ...

Standard PIM Tools

• (Desktop) Search Engines

• find text, but no meaning

• no context, no hierarchy, no organization, no

prioritization

• Windows Search, Google Desktop Search, Spotlight, ...

Semantic PIM

• Associations

a mental model

• Semantics

words connected

with meaning

• and documents

The Semantic Desktop: Associative Assistance

PersonPerson

ProjectProject

Documents

Papers

Projects

CID

Research

Files E-Mails

Inbox

Todo

SAP

CID-proj

Karlsruhe

Contacts

Claudia Stern

Dirk Hagemann

Klaus Nord

MeetingMeeting

LocationLocation

PIMO - a Framework for Representing Personal Information Models

http://www.dfki.uni-kl.de/~sauermann/papers/sauermann+2007b.pdf

CIDCID

DirkDirk

BelfastBelfastClaudiaClaudia

KickoffKickoff

A Working Semantic Desktop: Nepomuk-KDE

http://www2.mandriva.com/linux/overview/

Cluug.com Approach to PIM

• Identify relevant things

• Bring information into context (projects, persons, tasks,

topics, communication, events, ...)

• Re-find information by browsing

• Try to understand what information means

• Assist the user proactively wherever they are

• Be extensible, non-obtrusive, and orthogonal to what is

existing

• Later: share in groups

How can we benefit from PIM?

PIM Benefits

• For organizations: better PIM means better productivity!

• better understanding of information and needs

• better teamwork and group IM

• key to leveraging employee expertise

• For people: better PIM makes happy!

• feel organized

• reduce cognitive overload

Creating PIM Awareness

• Awareness of the challenges and opportunities of active

PIM is important!

• Education and training pays off

• Interviews and discussions help people reflecting their

habits

• “A little PIM can go a long way”

Contact

bernhard.schandl@gnowsis.com

www.gnowsis.com

www.cluug.com

Recommended