View
7
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH520) Written Assignment-
Critique a research article.pdfby Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige
Submission date: 14-May-2018 03:11PM (UTC+1000)Submission ID: 963397198File name:140127_Tharindu_Dushyantha_Dewalegama_Gamacharige_220179206_D_G_Tharindu__HLTH_520__Writte.pdfWord count: 3869Character count: 22390
this is a good introduction
research def int ion
EBP
very good
good
very good
very good
very good
very good
good
good discussion of the topic of COPD
you needed to include a reference tothe article here
good
you have undertaken some good analysis here
good
good
you need to include a reference to the article here
support ing reference
art icle
support ing reference
support ing reference
art icle
art icle
art icle
art icle
Conclusion
1
24%SIMILARITY INDEX
14%INTERNET SOURCES
5%PUBLICATIONS
21%STUDENT PAPERS
1 6%
2 2%
3 1%
4 1%
5 1%
6 1%
7 1%
8 1%
9 1%
220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdfORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to University of New EnglandStudent Paper
Submitted to TAFE Queensland BrisbaneStudent Paper
Submitted to Waikato Institute of TechnologyStudent Paper
eprints.uwe.ac.ukInternet Source
Submitted to Napier UniversityStudent Paper
scholarworks.alaska.eduInternet Source
Submitted to EDMCStudent Paper
Submitted to Sheffield Hallam UniversityStudent Paper
Submitted to University of QueenslandStudent Paper
10 1%
11 1%
12 1%
13 1%
14 1%
15 1%
16 1%
17 <1%
18 <1%
19 <1%
20 <1%
21
lra.le.ac.ukInternet Source
Submitted to Southern Cross UniversityStudent Paper
Submitted to Bolton Institute of HigherEducationStudent Paper
www.research.manchester.ac.ukInternet Source
Submitted to University of Central LancashireStudent Paper
Submitted to Chamberlain College of NursingStudent Paper
Submitted to University of SouthamptonStudent Paper
courseprofile.secure.griff ith.edu.auInternet Source
media.elsevierhealth.com.auInternet Source
Submitted to Monash UniversityStudent Paper
Submitted to The Robert Gordon UniversityStudent Paper
Submitted to University Of TasmaniaStudent Paper
<1%
22 <1%
23 <1%
24 <1%
25 <1%
26 <1%
27 <1%
28 <1%
29 <1%
30 <1%
31 <1%
32 <1%
Submitted to Bournemouth UniversityStudent Paper
Submitted to Kingston UniversityStudent Paper
eprints.uthm.edu.myInternet Source
Submitted to Edith Cowan UniversityStudent Paper
Submitted to University of NewcastleStudent Paper
Submitted to American IntercontinentalUniversity OnlineStudent Paper
Submitted to Oxford Brookes UniversityStudent Paper
canberra.libguides.comInternet Source
espace.curtin.edu.auInternet Source
centaur.reading.ac.ukInternet Source
usir.salford.ac.ukInternet Source
33 <1%
34 <1%
35 <1%
Exclude quotes Of f
Exclude bibliography Of f
Exclude matches Of f
health.gov.auInternet Source
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.govInternet Source
eprints.qut.edu.auInternet Source
QM
QM
FINAL GRADE
40/50
220179206 D G Tharindu (HLTH 520) Written Assignment-Critique a research article.pdfGRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
InstructorHi Tharindu,
You have met the requirements f or this assignment.
You started with a clear introduction of what youplanned to do within the essay.
You provided def init ions and descriptions ofresearch and EBP and discussed the dif f erences.
You provided a good overview and detail about thearticle you were going to crit ique. You includedadditional literature that you compared it to.However, you have not once ref erenced the articleyou are crit iquing within your essay only the tit le, andit is not in your ref erence list?
Good application of the checklist although you couldhave supported some of the discussion andanalysis with the literature.
Overall good work. Please see comments within your essay. Best wishes, Karen
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
Text Comment. this is a good introduction
research def intiongood def init ion and description of research
EBPGood def init ion and description of EBP
PAGE 3
Text Comment. very good
PAGE 4
Text Comment. good
Text Comment. very good
PAGE 5
Text Comment. very good
PAGE 6
Text Comment. very good
Text Comment. very good
PAGE 7
Text Comment. good
Text Comment. good discussion of the topic of COPD
PAGE 8
Text Comment. you needed to include a ref erence to the article here
PAGE 9
Text Comment. good
Text Comment. you have undertaken some good analysis here
PAGE 10
Text Comment. good
PAGE 11
Text Comment. good
Text Comment. you need to include a ref erence to the article here
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
QM
supporting referencerequires a ref erence to support this paragraph
PAGE 12
articleyou need to ref erence the article you are ref erring to here
supporting referencerequires a ref erence to support this paragraph
PAGE 13
supporting referencerequires a ref erence to support this paragraph
articleyou need to ref erence the article you are ref erring to here
PAGE 14
articleyou need to ref erence the article you are ref erring to here
articleyou need to ref erence the article you are ref erring to here
PAGE 15
articleyou need to ref erence the article you are ref erring to here
Conclusiongood but you need to summarise what you have discussed within your essay
PAGE 16
Comment 1you have not included the article that you have crit iqued in your ref erence list
PAGE 17
PAGE 18
RUBRIC: HLTH520 ASSESSMENT 50%
CRITERION 1 (20%)
HD(100)
HD(95)
HD(85)
D(80)
D(75)
C(70)
C(65)
P(60)
P(55)
P(50)
N(45)
N(35)
CRITERION 2 (20%)
HD(100)
HD(95)
79 / 100
85 / 100
Demonstrates mastery of the underlying principles of the dif f erences between research and evidencebased practice and the implications f or health and social care
Comprehensively def ines and describes the dif f erences between research andevidence based practice and the implications f or health and social care
Comprehensively def ines and describes the dif f erences between research andevidence based practice and the implications f or health and social care
Comprehensively def ines and describes the dif f erences between research andevidence based practice and the implications f or health and social care
There is evidence of detailed def init ions and descriptions between research andevidence based practice and the implications f or health and social care
There is evidence of detailed def init ions and descriptions between research andevidence based practice and the implications f or health and social care
There are adequate def init ions and descriptions between research and evidencebased practice and the implications f or health and social care
There are adequate def init ions and descriptions between research and evidencebased practice and the implications f or health and social care
There is minimal inf ormation about the dif f erences between research and evidencebased practice and the implications f or health and social care
There is minimal inf ormation about the dif f erences between research and evidencebased practice and the implications f or health and social care
There is minimal inf ormation about the dif f erences between research and evidencebased practice and the implications f or health and social care
There are no def init ions or descriptions of research and evidence based practice andthe implications f or health and social care
There are no def init ions or descriptions of research and evidence based practice andthe implications f or health and social care
80 / 100
Investigate and analyse an appropriate research article that is related to an area of practice. Discuss why itis important and what impact it would have in practice
Provides a comprehensive rationale f or the choice of the article to be investigatedand analysed and relates this to their area of practice. Discusses the importance ofthe research and how it would impact in practice
Provides a comprehensive rationale f or the choice of the article to be investigatedand analysed and relates this to their area of practice. Discusses the importance ofthe research and how it would impact in practice
HD(85)
D(80)
D(75)
C(70)
C(65)
P(60)
P(55)
P(50)
N(45)
N(35)
CRITERION 3 (20%)
HD(100)
HD(95)
HD(85)
Provides a comprehensive rationale f or the choice of the article to be investigatedand analysed and relates this to their area of practice. Discusses the importance ofthe research and how it would impact in practice
Provides a detailed rationale f or the choice of the article to be investigated andanalysed and relates this to their area of practice. Discusses the importance of theresearch and how it would impact in practice
Provides a detailed rationale f or the choice of the article to be investigated andanalysed and relates this to their area of practice. Discusses the importance of theresearch and how it would impact in practice
An adequate rationale has been discussed f or the choice of the article to beinvestigated and analysed, and is related to an area of practice. Discusses theimportance of the research and how it would impact in practice
An adequate rationale has been discussed f or the choice of the article to beinvestigated and analysed, and is related to an area of practice. Discusses theimportance of the research and how it would impact in practice
The rationale is minimal in relation to the choice of article to be crit iqued. There isvery litt le discussion of which area of practice it would be suitable f or. Minimaldiscussion on the importance of the research and how it would impact in practice
The rationale is minimal in relation to the choice of article to be crit iqued. There isvery litt le discussion of which area of practice it would be suitable f or. Minimaldiscussion on the importance of the research and how it would impact in practice
The rationale is minimal in relation to the choice of article to be crit iqued. There isvery litt le discussion of which area of practice it would be suitable f or. Minimaldiscussion on the importance of the research and how it would impact in practice
There is no rationale f or the choice of article and no discussion about the area ofpractice. No discussion on the importance of the research and how it would impact inpractice
There is no rationale f or the choice of article and no discussion about the area ofpractice. No discussion on the importance of the research and how it would impact inpractice
80 / 100
Identif ies the study design and justif ies the appropriateness of the design to the study
There is evidence of a comprehensive discussion in relation to the study designwhich is correctly identif ied as qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematicreview
There is evidence of a comprehensive discussion in relation to the study designwhich is correctly identif ied as qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematicreview
There is evidence of a comprehensive discussion in relation to the study designwhich is correctly identif ied as qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic
D(80)
D(75)
C(70)
C(65)
P(60)
P(55)
P(50)
N(45)
N(35)
CRITERION 4 (20%)
HD(100)
HD(95)
HD(85)
D(80)
D(75)
C(70)
C(65)
review
There is a detailed discussion in relation to the study design which is correctlyidentif ied as qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic review
There is a detailed discussion in relation to the study design which is correctlyidentif ied as qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic review
There is an adequate discussion in relation to the study design which is correctlyidentif ied as qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic review
There is an adequate discussion in relation to the study design which is correctlyidentif ied as qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic review
There is minimal discussion in relation to the study design which is correctly identif iedas qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic review
There is minimal discussion in relation to the study design which is correctly identif iedas qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic review
There is minimal discussion in relation to the study design which is correctly identif iedas qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods or systematic review
There is no discussion in relation to the study design which has not been correctlyidentif ied
There is no discussion in relation to the study design which has not been correctlyidentif ied
70 / 100
Apply methods (tools) to appraise and evaluate methodologies and methods used within a research articleto ensure the validity and trustworthiness of the research
There is evidence of a comprehensive crit ical appraisal and evaluation of theresearch article using an appropriate tool such as CASP
There is evidence of a comprehensive crit ical appraisal and evaluation of theresearch article using an appropriate tool such as CASP
There is evidence of a comprehensive crit ical appraisal and evaluation of theresearch article using an appropriate tool such as CASP
A detailed crit ical appraisal and evaluation has been undertaken of a research articleusing an appropriate tool such as CASP
A detailed crit ical appraisal and evaluation has been undertaken of a research articleusing an appropriate tool such as CASP
An adequate appraisal and evaluation has been undertaken of a research articleusing an appropriate tool such as CASP
An adequate appraisal and evaluation has been undertaken of a research articleusing an appropriate tool such as CASP
P(60)
P(55)
P(50)
N(45)
N(35)
CRITERION 5 (10%)
HD(100)
HD(95)
HD(85)
D(80)
D(75)
C(70)
C(65)
P(60)
P(55)
There is a minimal appraisal and evaluation that has been undertaken of a researcharticle using an appropriate tool such as CASP
There is a minimal appraisal and evaluation that has been undertaken of a researcharticle using an appropriate tool such as CASP
There is a minimal appraisal and evaluation that has been undertaken of a researcharticle using an appropriate tool such as CASP
There is no appraisal or evaluation of the research article or no CASP tool or othershave been applied
There is no appraisal or evaluation of the research article or no CASP tool or othershave been applied
80 / 100
Follows requirements f or structure, presentation grammar and spelling.
Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment
Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment
Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment
Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,adheres to grammatical conventions with f ew errors and is a logical and well-structured assignment
Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,adheres to grammatical conventions with f ew errors and is a logical and well-structured assignment
Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, adheres togrammatical conventions, but with f requent errors, mainly a well- structuredassignment, lacking cohesion in places
Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, adheres togrammatical conventions, but with f requent errors, mainly a well- structuredassignment, lacking cohesion in places
Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion
Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion
P(50)
N(45)
N(35)
CRITERION 6 (10%)
HD(100)
HD(95)
HD(85)
D(80)
D(75)
C(70)
C(65)
P(60)
P(55)
P(50)
N(45)
N
Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion
Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion
Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion
80 / 100
Follows requirements f or ref erencing (APA 6th Edition) and the application of evidence
Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughout theassignment
Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughout theassignment
Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughout theassignment
Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Principally acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment
Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Principally acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment
A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment
A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment
Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erence listMinimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment
Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erence listMinimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment
Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erence listMinimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment
Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,multiple and consistent APA errors throughout Litt le or no acknowledgment ofsources used throughout the assignment
Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,
(35) multiple and consistent APA errors throughout Litt le or no acknowledgment ofsources used throughout the assignment
Recommended