*copyright 2007 Urbany and Davis, Revised and used with permission Smith Design, Ltd.: Applying...

Preview:

Citation preview

*copyright 2007 Urbany and Davis,Revised and used with permission

A

BCD

GE

F

Smith Design, Ltd.:Applying 3-Circles

Strategic Insight in 3 Circles*

A

BCD

GE

F

Prepared for Toro/EIGCA seminar October, 2011

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

The Case of Hop-n-Scotch

• Bad things can happen when tactics take the place of marketing strategy!

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Smith Design, Ltd.

Applying the 3-Circle ProcessAn Illustration

The 3-Circle Elements

• Market - organizations with needs to satisfy, money to spend, and a willingness to spend it.– Market segments - sub-groups within a

market that share important demand features but differ from others in the same market

• Firm - firm or a unit of the firm• Competition - one or more organizations

pursuing the segment being analyzed

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Smith’s Market Options

• What markets might Bradley Smith consider for the Context of the 3-circle analysis?

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Selecting a Market

• Group of Prospects with:– Needs to satisfy– Money to spend– Willingness to spend it

• Issues to Consider:– Strength of the need(s)– Size of the group (segments?)– Alternative solutions

Market Context Statement(step 1 to be revised later)

“My goal is to figure out how (I/we/my company/division) can grow by

creating more value for (customer/market segment) than (my competitors) do.”

“My goal is to figure out how Smith Design, Ltd.

can grow by creating more value for

Multiple use course adapters than

competitors for this market do.”

Customer Analysis (steps 2, 3, & 4)

• Customer Value Basics– Attributes/Benefits sought by the market and

its segments, along with importance

• What does Bradley Smith know and what can he learn about this market?– Sources of information?– Are there market segments - Subgroups

defined by important demand features?

Begin with the circle, the area of which represents

requirements, needs or desired seller attributes

of courses seeking multiple use adaptations.

1. Customers’ Desired Attributes

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Benefits Sought by Market

• What are some attributes or desired benefits you might expect of this (adapters) market?

Market’s Desired Attributes

• “Before” analysis (data from inside Smith Design)– Sources?

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Market’s Desired Attributes

• “After” analysis (data from actual or potential customers) – Sources?

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Benefits Sought by Market

• Heavy usage• Permanence (durable)• Design competitively priced • Aesthetically pleasing• Low maintenance• Easily accessible• Broadly appealing• Urgency (immediacy)• Etc.

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Importance and Reconciliation

• Estimate importance (low, moderate, high) for “Before” and “After” worksheets (column 2)

• Reconcile differences– Potential insights?

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Benefits Sought by Market

• Heavy usage - H• Permanence (durable) - M• Design competitively priced - H• Aesthetically pleasing - L• Low maintenance - M• Site easily accessible - L• Broadly appealing - L• Urgency (immediacy) - M

For courses seeking multiple

use adaptations…

1. Customers’ Desired Attributes

• Price• Heavy usage• Permanence• Low maintenance• Urgency

assume these are the most desired attributes

1. Customers’ Desired Attributes

• Heavy usage• Urgency• Permanence• Competitive price• Low maintenance

…but even if they have the same needs, not all market members have the same need priorities

• Low price • Low maintenance• Heavy usage• Permanence• Urgency

1. Customers’ Desired Attributes

• Heavy usage• Urgency• Permanence• Competitive price• Low maintenance

Priorities define market segments

• Low price • Low maintenance• Heavy usage• Permanence• Urgency

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Attribute Importance Rating

• Segment 1– Heavy usage– Urgency– Permanence– Competitive price– Low Maintenance

• Segment 2– Price– Low maintenance– Heavy usage– Permanence– Urgency

1. Customers’ Desired Attributes• Heavy usage

• Urgency• Permanence• Competitive price• Low maintenance

“Private Developer”

A segment is selected for analysis based on several criteria…

• Low price • Low maintenance• Heavy usage• Permanence• Urgency

“Municipality”

?

?

Selecting a Segment for Analysis

• Readiness to Act

• Accessibility

• Size

• Compatibility

• Competition

1. Segment’s Desired Attributes

• Heavy usage• Urgency• Permanence• Competitive price• Low maintenance

PrivateDevelopers

This segment best meets the conditions

What might some

“Deep Diving” reveal?

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Segment Context Statement(step 1 revised)

“My goal is to figure out how Smith Design, Ltd.

can grow by creating more value for

Private developers of multiple use course

adaptations than

Green Space Providers, Ltd. and others do.”

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

The Firm: Smith Design, Ltd.(step 5)

• Identify Smith Design Ltd. CRA’s for this segment– “Before” Analysis and Worksheet (column 3)

• Smith’s view

– “After” Analysis and Worksheet (column 3)• Market’s view

• How is Smith Design perceived by this market?– Does Smith have an accurate notion of what this

market believes about his firm?– Can Smith identify the market’s perceptions of his

firm?

Smith Design Attributes

• “Before” Analysis– Experience– Staff– EIGCA membership– Time– Relationships– Reputation

• “After” Analysis– Experience– Reputation– Time

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired AttributesSmith Design, Ltd.

Smith’s reconciled capabilities, resources, and assets are represented by this circle

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired AttributesSmith Design, Ltd.

Smith’s reconciled capabilities, resources, and assets

Time

Experience

EIGCA member

Relationships

Staff

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

This overlap represents the value customers in this segment believe Smith can create for them

Smith Design, Ltd.

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

… in other words …

Smith Design, Ltd.

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

This overlapping area represents Smith’s positive value or “equities.”

Equities

Smith Design, Ltd.

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Disequities andPotential Equities

Smith needs to determine how much his firm’s equities overlap with this segment’s needs…

Unmet needs

Smith Design, Ltd.

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Here we match the overlap of Smith’s CRAs with this segment’s needs?

Smith Design, Ltd.

Urgency&Time

Permanence&EIGCA

Private Developersegment

Aesthetic&Experience

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

These areas are also meaningful

Smith Design, Ltd. Private Developersegment

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Customers feel they don’t need some of the value Smith creates (yet?)

Disequities andPotential Equities

Smith Design, Ltd.

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Here Smith has his unmatched and matched CRAs

Smith Design, Ltd.

Urgency&TimeStaff

Relationships Permanence&EIGCA

Private Developersegment

Aesthetic&Experience

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Disequities andPotential Equities

… and there are needs of the segment neither Smith nor his competitors recognized so they go unmet…

Unmet needs

Smith Design, Ltd Private Developersegment

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Disequities andPotential Equities

… an unmet (or unrecognized) need might be…

Smith Design, Ltd Private Developersegment

Environment friendly

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Disequities andPotential Equities

Next Smith must recognize…

Unmet needs

Smith Design, Ltd

Equities

Private Developersegment

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Disequities andPotential Equities

Some of this space is shared with competitors

Unmet needs

Smith Design, Ltd

Equities

Private Developersegment

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Competition (step 6)

• What other firms are pursuing this market segment?– Likely sources of information?

• “Before” Analysis Worksheet– Smith’s view of competitors (Green Space Providers,

Ltd.) resources (column 4)

• “After” Analysis Worksheet– Segment’s view of competitors (Green Space

Providers, Ltd.) resources (column 4)

Equities

Disequities/potential equity

Unmet need

1. Customers’desired attributes

2. Companyequities/disequities

3. Competitor equities/disequities

… there are competitors who also create value for customers…

Smith Design, Ltd.

Green Space Providers, Ltd.

Private Developersegment

Points ofParity

Disequities/potential equity

Equities

Disequities/potential equity

Unmet need

1. Customers’desired attributes

2. Companyequities/disequities

3. Competitor equities/disequities

What both Smith and his competitor offer…

Smith Design, Ltd.

Green Space Providers, Ltd.

Private Developersegment

Points of Parity

Disequities/potential equity

1. Customers’desired attributes

2. Companyequities/disequities

3. Competitor equities/disequities

Once Competitors are added…

1. Customers’desired attributes

2. Companyequities/disequities

3. Competitor equities/disequities

Every unique area in the model takes on meaning…

1. Customers’desired attributes

2. Companyequities/disequities

3. Competitor equities/disequities

BPoints of Parity

… Area B contains the table stakes… value Smith must provideto be in the game…

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Absolutely must have…

Smith Design, Ltd. Private Developersegment

Aesthetic & Experience

Green Space Providers, Ltd.

3. Competitor equities/disequities

1. Customers’desired attributes

2. Companyequities/disequities

3. Competitor equities/disequities

BPoints of Parity

… Area A is Smith’s unique value to customers, the most important concept in his competitive strategy…

ASmith’s points of Difference

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Smith has these advantages over the competition…

Smith Design, Ltd.

Urgency& Time

Permanence& EIGCA

Private Developersegment

Green Space Providers, Ltd.

3. Competitor equities/disequities

1. Customers’desired attributes

2. Companyequities/disequities

3. Competitor equities/disequities

BPoints of Parity

Yet, the competitor has desirable points of difference as well…

ASmith’s points of Difference

CTheir pointsof Difference

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Smith must neutralize or duplicate this…

Smith Design, Ltd. Private Developersegment

Broad appeal

Green Space Providers, Ltd.

3. Competitor equities/disequities

1. Customers’desired attributes

2. Companyequities/disequities

3. Competitor equities/disequities

BPoints of Parity

Smith’s profitability depends upon the relative size and importance of his Area A compared to competitors’ Area C

ASmith’s points of Difference

CTheir pointsof Difference

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Are Smith’s advantages more attractive than the competitor’s?

Smith Design, Ltd.

Urgency& Time

Permanence& EIGCA

Private Developersegment

Broad appeal

Green Space Providers, Ltd.

3. Competitor equities/disequities

1. Customers’desired attributes

2. Companyequities/disequities

3. Competitor equities/disequities

BPoints of Parity

Area D is value competitors create that currently is not seen as valuable by the segment!

AYour points of Difference

CTheir pointsof Difference

DCommon disequity/Potential equity

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Possibly essential resources but often ignored by the market…

Smith Design, Ltd.

Staff

Private Developersegment

Green Space Providers, Ltd.

3. Competitor equities/disequities

1. Customers’desired attributes

2. Companyequities/disequities

3. Competitor equities/disequities

BPoints of Parity

… and each competitor has its own unique area of Potential Value

ASmith’s points of Difference

CTheir pointsof Difference

DCommon disequity/Potential equity

ESmith’s disequity/Potentialequity

FTheir disequity/Potentialequity

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Opportunity exists here…

Smith Design, Ltd.

Relationships

Private Developersegment

Green Space Providers, Ltd.

Size 3. Competitor equities/disequities

1. Customers’desired attributes

2. Companyequities/disequities

3. Competitor equities/disequities

BPoints of Parity

Significantly for the future, every customer/segment has “white space”

ASmith’s points of Difference

CTheir pointsof Difference

DCommon disequity/Potential equity

ESmith’s disequity/Potentialequity

FTheir disequity/Potentialequity

G

“White Space”

1. Customers’desired attributes

2. Smith’sequities/disequities

3. Competitor equities/disequities

BPoints of Parity

… an area representing customers’ needs that haven’t yet been met…

ASmith’s points of Difference

CTheir pointsof Difference

DCommon disequity/Potential equity

ESmith’s disequity/Potentialequity

FTheir disequity/Potentialequity

G

“White Space”

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

Can Smith do something about this unmet need?

Smith Design, Ltd. Private Developersegment

Environment friendly

Green Space Providers, Ltd.

3. Competitor equities/disequities

1. Customers’desired attributes

2. Smith’sequities/disequities

3. Competitor equities/disequities

BPoints of Parity

This illustrates the model… it captures the market segment, the firm, and the competition.

ASmith’s points of Difference

CTheir pointsof Difference

DCommon disequity/Potential equity

ESmith’s disequity/Potential equity

FTheir disequity/Potentialequity

G

“White Space”

2. CompanyEquities/Disequities

1. Customers’Desired Attributes

So in the final analysis, the 3-circles might look something like this…

Smith Design, Ltd.

Urgency& Time

Staff

Relationships Permanence& EIGCA

Private Developersegment

Broad appeal

Environment friendly

Aesthetic & Experience

Green Space Providers, Ltd.

Size 3. Competitor equities/disequities

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Alignment (step 8)

• Does Smith Design have a “Competitive Advantage” in this market?– Points of Difference– Sustainable CRA basis for points of difference

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Dynamics (step 9)

• What changes are predictable in the:– Market– Competition– Environment

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Finding Growth Opportunities (step 10)

• Is this a viable segment for Smith?– Can Smith meet its needs better than the

competition?– Is it financially attractive?

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Positioning Statement Format

• For (target customer)

• Who (statement of need)

• Our (product/brand)

• Is a (product category)

• That (key benefit/reason to buy)

• Unlike (primary alternatives)

• We provide (differential advantage)

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Smith’s Positioning Statement

• For Private Developers adapting existing golf courses for multiple uses

• Who require rapid design responses that provides durable facilities,

• Our staff at Smith Design, Ltd.• Are highly capable and experienced land planners • that provide customized designs for multiple use facilities

including aspects of golf.• Unlike Green Space Providers, Ltd., • We provide designs that incorporate golf with regionally

appealing outdoor recreation and spectator venues that are environmentally friendly.

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

©copyright 2007 Urbany and DavisA

BCD

GE

F

Adding Tactics

• Now (and only now) Smith is ready to devise marketing tactics:– Assess the offering (learn new skills, acquire

equipment, adapt staff?)– Plan sales contacts– Design messages (presentations, media)– Set a price

Recommended