CIVIL LIBERTIES

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

CIVIL LIBERTIES. BILL OF RIGHTS #1-#10 FEDERAL…. STATES(#14) INCORPORATION. 4.KEY CONCEPTS. 1.GUARANTEED. 2.RELATIVE…. NOT ABSOLUTE. 3. APPLY TO ALL. 4.RIGHTS IN CONFLICT… EXAMPLES…. FREE PRESS (1) VS. FAIR TRIAL (6). FREE SPEECH (1) VS. PUBLIC ORDER. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

CIVIL LIBERTIES

BILL OF RIGHTS#1-#10

FEDERAL….

STATES(#14)INCORPORATION

4.KEY CONCEPTS

1.GUARANTEED

2.RELATIVE….NOT ABSOLUTE

3. APPLY TO ALL

4.RIGHTS IN CONFLICT…EXAMPLES…

FREE PRESS (1)VS.

FAIR TRIAL (6)

FREE SPEECH (1)VS.

PUBLIC ORDER

CULTURAL CONFLICTS

RELIGION

LANGUAGE

SEXUAL PREFERENCE

hola Hello Bonjour

1ST AMENDMENT5 PARTS….

R-S-P-P-A

SPEECH11 EXAMPLES…

1.PRIOR RESTRAINT

PENTAGON PAPERSNY TIMES v. US

1971

HAZLEWOOD – 1988SCHOOL PAPER

MS. SHORT

2.CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER

U.S. v. SCHENK - 1919

“MOVIE…MOVIE”

GITLOW CASE – 192514TH AMENDMENT

“incorporation”

“STATES”

3.“IMMINENT THREAT”

BRANDENBURGv. OHIO - 1969

4.LIBELAKER IS A*&%$#$%*

5.SLANDER

AKER IS A BUM!

AKER V. NOLCOX

2010

“SEDITION”SPEECH VS. THE GOVERNMENT

6.OBSCENITYMILLER v. CALIF.

1973

BETHEL V. FRASER1986

7.PREFERRED POSITION

8.LEAST RESTRICTIVE RULE

9.SYMBOLIC SPEECH

TINKER CASE - 1969

TEXAS v. JOHNSONTEXAS v. JOHNSON19891989

“FLAG BURNING”“FLAG BURNING”

10.CORPORATE SPEECH

11. $$$ “SPEECH”BUCKLEY v. VALEO

RELIGION“FIRST 16 WORDS”

E & E

EXERCISE“BELIEF-SPEECH-

CONDUCT DISTINCTION”

WESTBORO BAPTIST CHURCH

1.POLYGAMYU.S. v REYNOLDS-

1898

2.MEDICAL CARE

3.EDUCATION“AMISH

EXCEPTION”

4. MILITARY CLAY v. U.S. - 1971

“CONSCIENTIOUSOBJECTOR”

5. CONFIDENTIALITY

ESTABLISHMENT7 EXAMPLES…

“ separation of church and state????”

LEMON v. KURTZMAN –1971

THE LEMON TEST

“EXCESSIVE ENTANGLEMENT”

1. “I PLEDGE…”

2. PRAYER IN SCHOOL

ENGEL v. VITALE1962

3. PUBLIC TAX $

EVERSON v. N.J. 1947-BUSING $$

“BENEVOLENT NEUTRALITY”

4. EPPERSON V. ARK(EVOLUTION)

5. EQUAL ACCESS(1984)

6. SUNDAY BUSINESS

7. SCHOOL CALENDARS

2ND AMENDMENT“THE ,,,,,,,,,,,,,”

Search Results

Page 2

U.S. V. LOPEZ - 1995

COMMERCECLAUSE!!!

D.C. V. HELLER (2008)

**D.C.’S BAN ON INDIVIDUAL

HANDGUNS RULED UNCONSITUTIONAL

3RD AMENDMENT

4TH AMENDMENT

STUDENT SEARCHES

         

 

T.L.O. v. N.J. - 1984

REASONABLE SUSPICION

1. SEARCH WARRANT

PROBABLE CAUSE

FIVEEXCEPTIONS

A. PLAIN VIEW

B. HOT PURSUIT

C. MOVABLE SCENE

DRUGS

D. SUBSEQUENT TO AN ARREST…

E. CONSENT

2. THE EXCLUSIONARY

RULE

3.“GOOD-FAITH EXCEPTION”

MAPP v. OHIO -1961“incorporated exclusionary

rule”

TERRY V. OHIO (1968)“STOP AND FRISK”

KYLLO V. U.S. (2001)“THERMAL IMAGING”

USA PATRIOT ACTPG. 519

5TH AMENDMENT“DUE PROCESS”

1.SELF-INCRIMINATION

ESCOBEDO V. ILL. (1964)

* CONFESSION WITHOUT LAWYER PRESENT

INADMISSABLE#5 AND #6

MIRANDA v. ARIZONA - 1966

2. GRAND JURY“INDICTMENT”

3. DOUBLE JEOPARDY

4. EMINENT DOMAIN

“THEY PAVED PARADISE…”

6th AMENDMENT3 PARTS….

1. SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL

2. IMPARTIAL JURY

3. COUNSEL(ATTORNEY)

GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT –

1963(#6)

7TH AMENDMENT

8TH AMENDMENT“CRUEL AND UNUSUAL

PUNISHMENT”

FURMAN v. GEORGIA - 1972

GREGG v. GEORGIA1976

ROPER V. SIMMONS2005

18

PRE-ROPER

X

18

17

16

ATKINS V. VIRGINIA(2002)

…BANS EXECUTION OF MENTALLY

RETARDED

SCHOOLS: “CORPORAL PUNISHMENT”

EXCESSIVE FINES OR BAIL

9TH AMENDMENT“OTHER RIGHTS NOT

ENUMERATED”

10TH AMENDMENT“RESERVE CLAUSE”

CH. 19 – CIVIL RIGHTS

SUSPECT CLASSIFICATIONS

STRICT SCRUTINY

REASONABLENESS

INCOME???

RACE???

GENDER???

AGE???

AFRICAN-AMERICAN

CIVIL RIGHTS

SHIFT….CONGRESS

TOCOURT

14TH AMENDMENT1868

“DUE PROCESS & EQUAL PROTECTION”

SELECTIVEINCORPORATION

PLESSY v. FERGUSON -1896

NAACP - 1909

1938 – LLOYD GAINESpg. 529

ADA LOIS SIPUEL1948

1950- HEMAN SWEATT

1954 – LINDA BROWN“DELIBERATE

SPEED”

DE JURE BY LAW…

VS.DE FACTOIN FACT…

SWANN v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG B.O.E. - 1971

BACK TO CONGRESS….4 CHANGES…

1. PUBLIC OPINION

2. MEDIA COVERAGE

3. JFK ASSASSINATION

                                  

4. 1964 ELECTIONSD-D-D

LIST ON????537?

538?

539?

537

PROFILING

WOMEN AND EQUAL RIGHTS

ABORTION RIGHTS“PRIVACY”

#4-#9-#14

GRISWOLD v. CONNECTICUT – 1965

“PRIVACY”

ROE v. WADE – 1973…BANNED STATE

LAWS THAT BANNED

ABORTION…

TRIMESTERS…

NORMAMcCORVEY

HYDE AMENDMENT1976

WEBSTER1989 – STATE $$$

CASEY1992

“ UNDUE BURDEN”

24-HOUR WAITING PERIOD??

PARENTAL NOTIFICATION/CONSENT

STATE LAWS TODAY…

HEADED TO THE SUPREME COURT…

FMLA – 199312 WEEKS

UNPAID LEAVE

ROSTKER v.GOLDBERG -1981

LOVING V. VIRGINIA1967

“INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE”

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

BAKKE CASE – 1978QUOTAS???

THE BOLLINGER CASES2003

U. OF MICHIGAN

+20??

ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS

VS. PENA (1995)

CONSTITUTION PROTECTS PERSONS,

NOT GROUPS

PG. 545 - NATURALIZATION

ADA - 1990

Recommended