View
33
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
CAP5510 – Bioinformatics Protein Structures. Tamer Kahveci CISE Department University of Florida. What and Why?. Proteins fold into a three dimensional shape Structure can reveal functional information that we can not find from sequence Misfolding proteins can cause diseases - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
CAP5510 – BioinformaticsProtein Structures
Tamer Kahveci
CISE Department
University of Florida
2
What and Why?
• Proteins fold into a three dimensional shape
• Structure can reveal functional information that we can not find from sequence
• Misfolding proteins can cause diseases
– Sickle cell anemia, mad cow disease
• Used in drug design
Hemoglobin
Normal v.s. sickled blood cells
E → V
HIV proteaseinhibitor
3
Goals
• Understand protein structures• Primary, secondary, tertiary
• Learn how protein shapes are– determined– Predicted
• Structure comparison (?)
4
A Protein Sequence
>gi|22330039|ref|NP_683383.1| unknown protein; protein id: At1g45196.1 [Arabidopsis thaliana]
MPSESSYKVHRPAKSGGSRRDSSPDSIIFTPESNLSLFSSASVSVDRCSSTSDAHDRDDSLISAWKEEFEVKKDDESQNL
DSARSSFSVALRECQERRSRSEALAKKLDYQRTVSLDLSNVTSTSPRVVNVKRASVSTNKSSVFPSPGTPTYLHSMQKGW
SSERVPLRSNGGRSPPNAGFLPLYSGRTVPSKWEDAERWIVSPLAKEGAARTSFGASHERRPKAKSGPLGPPGFAYYSLY
SPAVPMVHGGNMGGLTASSPFSAGVLPETVSSRGSTTAAFPQRIDPSMARSVSIHGCSETLASSSQDDIHESMKDAATDA
QAVSRRDMATQMSPEGSIRFSPERQCSFSPSSPSPLPISELLNAHSNRAEVKDLQVDEKVTVTRWSKKHRGLYHGNGSKM
5
• Basic Amino AcidStructure:– The side chain, R,
varies for each ofthe 20 amino acids
C
RR
C
H
NO
OHH
H
Aminogroup
Carboxylgroup
Side chain
Amino Acid Composition
6
The Peptide Bond
• Dehydration synthesis• Repeating backbone: N–C –C –N–C –C
– Convention – start at amino terminus and proceed to carboxy terminus
O O
7
Peptidyl polymers
• A few amino acids in a chain are called a polypeptide. A protein is usually composed of 50 to 400+ amino acids.
• We call the units of a protein amino acid residues.
carbonylcarbonylcarboncarbon
amideamidenitrogennitrogen
8
Side chain properties
• Carbon does not make hydrogen bonds with water easily – hydrophobic
• O and N are generally more likely than C to h-bond to water – hydrophilic
• We group the amino acids into three general groups:– Hydrophobic– Charged (positive/basic & negative/acidic)– Polar
9
The Hydrophobic Amino Acids
10
The Charged Amino Acids
11
The Polar Amino Acids
12
More Polar Amino Acids
And then there’s…And then there’s…
13
Phi () – the angle of rotation about the N-C bond.
Psi () – the angle of rotation about the C-C bond.
The planar bond angles and bond lengths are fixed.
Planarity of the Peptide Bond
14
• Primary structure = the linear sequence of amino acids comprising a protein:
AGVGTVPMTAYGNDIQYYGQVT…• Secondary structure
– Regular patterns of hydrogen bonding in proteins result in two patterns that emerge in nearly every protein structure known: the -helix and the-sheet
– The location of direction of these periodic, repeating structures is known as the secondary structure of the protein
Primary & Secondary Structure
15
60°
The Alpha Helix
16
Properties of the Alpha Helix
60°• Hydrogen bonds
between C=O ofresidue n, andNH of residuen+4
• 3.6 residues/turn• 1.5 Å/residue rise• 100°/residue turn
17
Properties of -helices
• 4 – 40+ residues in length
• Often amphipathic or “dual-natured”– Half hydrophobic and half hydrophilic
• If we examine many -helices,we find trends…– Helix formers: Ala, Glu, Leu, Met– Helix breakers: Pro, Gly, Tyr, Ser
18
The beta strand (& sheet)
135° +135°
19
Properties of beta sheets
• Formed of stretches of 5-10 residues in extended conformation
• Parallel/aniparallel,contiguous/non-contiguous
20
Anti-Parallel Beta Sheets
21
Parallel Beta Sheets
22
Mixed Beta Sheets
23
Turns and Loops
• Secondary structure elements are connected by regions of turns and loops
• Turns – short regions of non-, non- conformation
• Loops – larger stretches with no secondary structure. – Sequences vary much more than secondary
structure regions
24
Ramachandran Plot
25
Levels of Protein
Structure
• Secondary structure elements combine to form tertiary structure
• Quaternary structure occurs in multienzyme complexes
26
Protein Structure Example
Beta Sheet
Helix Loop
ID: 12as2 chains
27
Wireframe Ball and stick
Views of a Protein
28
Views of a protein
Spacefill Cartoon
CPK colors
Carbon = green, black, or grey
Nitrogen = blue
Oxygen = red
Sulfur = yellow
Hydrogen = white
29
Common Protein Motifs
30
• Four helical bundle:
Globin domain:
Mostly Helical Folding Motifs
31
/ barrel:
/ Motifs
32
Open TwistedBeta Sheets
33
Beta Barrels
34
Determining the Structure of a Protein
Experimental Methods
•X-ray
•NMR
As of August 2013, structure of > 85,000 proteins are determined
35
X-Ray Crystallography
Crystals diffract X-rays in regular patterns (Max Von Laue, 1912)
Discovery of X-rays(Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen, 1895)
The first X-ray diffraction pattern from a protein crystal (Dorothy Hodgkin, 1934)
36
X-Ray Crystallography
• Grow millions of protein crystals– Takes months
• Expose to radiation beam• Analyze the image with
computer– Average over many copies
of images• PDB• Not all proteins can be
crystallized!
37
NMR
• Nuclear Magnetic Resonance• Nuclei of atoms vibrate when exposed to
oscillating magnetic field• Detect vibrations by external sensors• Computes inter-atomic distances.
• Requires complex analysis. NMR can be used for short sequences (<200 residues)
• More than one model can be derived from NMR.
38
Determining the Structure of a Protein
Computational Methods
39
The Protein Folding Problem
• Central question of molecular biology:“Given a particular sequence of amino acid residues (primary structure), what will the secondary/tertiary/quaternary structure of the resulting protein be?”
• Input: AAVIKYGCAL…Output: 11, 22…
40
Structure v.s. Sequence
• Observation: A protein with the same sequence (under the same circumstances) yields the same shape.
• Protein folds into a shape that minimizes the energy needed to stay in that shape.
• Protein folds in ~10-15 seconds.
41
Secondary Structure Prediction
42
Chou-Fasman methods
• Uses statistically obtained Chou-Fasman parameters.
• For each amino acid has– P(a): alpha– P(b): beta– P(t): turn– f(): additional turn parameter.
43
Chou-Fasman ParametersName Abbrv P(a) P(b) P(turn) f(i) f(i+1) f(i+2) f(i+3)Alanine A 142 83 66 0.06 0.076 0.035 0.058Arginine R 98 93 95 0.07 0.106 0.099 0.085Aspartic Acid D 101 54 146 0.147 0.11 0.179 0.081Asparagine N 67 89 156 0.161 0.083 0.191 0.091Cysteine C 70 119 119 0.149 0.05 0.117 0.128Glutamic Acid E 151 37 74 0.056 0.06 0.077 0.064Glutamine Q 111 110 98 0.074 0.098 0.037 0.098Glycine G 57 75 156 0.102 0.085 0.19 0.152Histidine H 100 87 95 0.14 0.047 0.093 0.054Isoleucine I 108 160 47 0.043 0.034 0.013 0.056Leucine L 121 130 59 0.061 0.025 0.036 0.07Lysine K 114 74 101 0.055 0.115 0.072 0.095Methionine M 145 105 60 0.068 0.082 0.014 0.055Phenylalanine F 113 138 60 0.059 0.041 0.065 0.065Proline P 57 55 152 0.102 0.301 0.034 0.068Serine S 77 75 143 0.12 0.139 0.125 0.106Threonine T 83 119 96 0.086 0.108 0.065 0.079Tryptophan W 108 137 96 0.077 0.013 0.064 0.167Tyrosine Y 69 147 114 0.082 0.065 0.114 0.125Valine V 106 170 50 0.062 0.048 0.028 0.053
44
C.-F. Alpha Helix Prediction (1)
• Find P(a) for all letters• Find 6 contiguous letters, at least 4 of them have P(a) >
100• Declare these regions as alpha helix
A E A T T L C M Q S T Y C Y V
142 151 142 83 83 121 70 145 111 77 83 69 70 69 106
83 37 83 119 119 130 119 105 110 75 119 147 119 147 170
P(a)
P(b)
45
C.-F. Alpha Helix Prediction (2)
• Extend in both directions until 4 consecutive letters with P(a) < 100 found
A E A T T L C M Q S T Y C Y V
142 151 142 83 83 121 70 145 111 77 83 69 70 69 106
83 37 83 119 119 130 119 105 110 75 119 147 119 147 170
P(a)
P(b)
46
C.-F. Alpha Helix Prediction (3)
• Find sum of P(a) (Sa) and sum of P(b) (Sb) in the extended region– If region is long enough ( >= 5 letters) and P(a) > P(b) then
declare the extended region as alpha helix
A E A T T L C M Q S T Y C Y V
142 151 142 83 83 121 70 145 111 77 83 69 70 69 106
83 37 83 119 119 130 119 105 110 75 119 147 119 147 170
P(a)
P(b)
47
C.-F. Beta Sheet Prediction
• Same as alpha helix replace P(a) with P(b)
• Resolving overlapping alpha helix & beta sheet– Compute sum of P(a) (Sa) and sum of P(b)
(Sb) in the overlap.– If Sa > Sb => alpha helix– If Sb > Sa => beta sheet
48
C.-F. Turn Prediction
• An amino acid is predicted as turn if all of the following holds:– f(i)*f(i+1)*f(i+2)*f(i+3) > 0.000075– Avg(P(i+k)) > 100, for k=0, 1, 2, 3– Sum(P(t)) > Sum(P(a)) and Sum(P(b)) for i+k, (k=0, 1, 2, 3)
f()
A E A T T L C M Q S T Y C Y V
142 151 142 83 83 121 70 145 111 77 83 69 70 69 106
83 37 83 119 119 130 119 105 110 75 119 147 119 69 170
66 74 66 96 96 59 119 60 98 143 96 114 119 114 50
i i+1 i+2 i+3
P(a)
P(b)
P(t)
49
Other Methods for SSE Prediction
• Similarity searching– Predator
• Markov chain
• Neural networks– PHD
• ~65% to 80% accuracy
50
Tertiary Structure Prediction
51
Forces driving protein folding
• It is believed that hydrophobic collapse is a key driving force for protein folding– Hydrophobic core– Polar surface interacting with solvent
• Minimum volume (no cavities)• Disulfide bond formation stabilizes• Hydrogen bonds• Polar and electrostatic interactions
52
• Simple lattice models (HP-models or Hydrophobic-Polar models)– Two types of residues:
hydrophobic and polar– 2-D or 3-D lattice– The only force is
hydrophobic collapse– Score = number of
HH contacts
Fold Optimization
53
Scoring Lattice Models
• H/P model scoring: count noncovalent hydrophobic interactions.
• Sometimes:– Penalize for buried polar or surface hydrophobic residues
54
• For smaller polypeptides, exhaustive search can be used– Looking at the “best” fold, even in such a simple
model, can teach us interesting things about the protein folding process
• For larger chains, other optimization and search methods must be used– Greedy, branch and bound– Evolutionary computing, simulated annealing
Can we use lattice models?
55
The “hydrophobic zipper” effect
Ken Dill ~ 1997
56
Representing a lattice model
• Absolute directions– UURRDLDRRU
• Relative directions– LFRFRRLLFFL– Advantage, we can’t have
UD or RL in absolute– Only three directions: LRF
• What about bumps? LFRRR– Bad score– Use a better representation
57
Preference-order representation
• Each position has two “preferences”– If it can’t have either of the
two, it will take the “least favorite” path if possible
• Example: {LR},{FL},{RL},{FR},{RL},{RL},{FL},{RF}
• Can still cause bumps:{LF},{FR},{RL},{FL},{RL},{FL},{RF},{RL},{FL}
58
More realistic models
• Higher resolution lattices (45° lattice, etc.)• Off-lattice models
– Local moves– Optimization/search methods and /
representations• Greedy search• Branch and bound• EC, Monte Carlo, simulated annealing, etc.
59
How to Evaluate the Result?
• Now that we have a more realistic off-lattice model, we need a better energy function to evaluate a conformation (fold).
• Theoretical force field: G = Gvan der Waals + Gh-bonds + Gsolvent + Gcoulomb
• Empirical force fields– Start with a database– Look at neighboring residues – similar to known
protein folds?
60
Comparative Modeling
1. Identify similar protein sequences from a database of known proteins (BLAST)
2. Find conserved regions by aligning these proteins (CLUSTAL-W)
3. Predict alpha helices and beta sheets from conserved regions, backbone
4. Predict loops5. Predict side chain positions6. Evaluate
61
Threading: Fold recognition
• Given:– Sequence: IVACIVSTEYDVMKAAR…
– A database of molecular coordinates
• Map the sequence onto each fold
• Evaluate– Objective 1: improve
scoring function– Objective 2: folding
62
Folding : still a hard problem
• Levinthal’s paradox – Consider a 100 residue protein. If each residue can take only 3 positions, there are 3100 = 5 1047 possible conformations.– If it takes 10-13s to convert from 1 structure to
another, exhaustive search would take 1.6 1027 years.
63
Protein Classification
• Class: Similar secondary structure properties– All alpha, all beta, alpha/beta, alpha+beta
• Fold: major secondary structure similarity.– Globin like (6 helices, folded leaf, partly opened)
• Super family: distant homologs. 25-30% sequence identity.
• Family: close homologs. Evolved from the same ancestor. High identity.
Recommended