Branden Sudduth Director, Reliability Assessment and Performance Analysis

Branden SudduthDirector, Reliability Assessment and

Performance Analysis

Rocky Mountain Region PA/PC MeetingMarch 18-19, 2014Denver, Colorado

2

• The NERC Functional Model Overview• The Planning Coordinator• The Coverage Gap Issue in WECC• WECC Staff Observations• Planning Coordination Committee Effort

o Planning Coordinator Survey Results

Overview

The NERC Functional Model and the Planning Coordinator

4

• NERC Reliability Function Model version 5o Functional Definitions and Functional Entitieso Technical Document

• Purpose:o Provide a framework for Standards

developmentoDescribe reliability functions and relationships

between entities that are responsible for performing the tasks within the functions

The NERC Reliability Functional Model

5

• The model must be complete – no gaps• No overlap for operation tasks• In certain instances, overlap for planning

tasks is unavoidable• The model is a guideline – it does not

address requirements for registration, delegation, or sharing responsibility

Guiding Principles of the Model

6

• Develop methodologies for planning analysis and simulation

• Define information required for planning purposes and facilitate collection process

• Evaluate, develop, document, and report plans for Planning Coordinator area

• Coordinate with adjoining Planning Coordinators

• Develop and maintain models

Function – Planning Reliability

7

• “The functional entity that coordinates, facilitates, integrates and evaluates (generally one year and beyond) transmission facility and service plans, and resource plans within a Planning Coordinator area and coordinates those plans with adjoining Planning Coordinator areas.”

• Assesses longer-term reliability

Functional Entity – Planning Coordinator

8

• Standards applicable to the “Planning Authority” are applicable to the “Planning Coordinator” (pre-version 3 revision)

Standards – Planning Coordinator

9

• Some Applicable Reliability Standardso TPL-001 through 004 (System Performance)o FAC-002 (Coordination of Plans for New

Facilities)o FAC-010 (System Operating Limits

Methodology for the Planning Horizon)oMOD-016 (Actual and Forecast Demands, Net

Energy for Load, Controllable DSM)

Standards – Planning Coordinator (cont.)

10

• NERC Functional Model is not always prescriptive on “who reports to who”

• Depending on the specific function, reporting structure for a functional entity may change

• Structure can vary greatly depending on interpretation by entity

• Planning Coordinator definition is vague and Registration doesn’t help

Organization Structure

The Planning Coordinator Gap Issue in WECC

12

• June 2007oMandatory Standards initially created chaos o “Checklist” registration with no review or

coordination

• Functional Model meant to be a one-size-fits-all solution – in many instances, WECC is “different”o Area Coordinatorso Path Operators

Contributing Factors to the Problem

13

Planning Coordinator Count by Region

Region Planning Coordinators

Transmission Planners

WECC 30 46

TRE 1 27

FRCC 14 13

MRO 5 24

NPCC 6 14

RFC 3 13

SERC 20 32

SPP 2 19

14

• Perceived reliability risk because:o Several entities do not know who their Planning

Coordinator is or mistakenly assume another entity is performing this function for them

o There is a lack of clarity in Functional Model around who should be a Planning Coordinator

o There is no clear definition of a Planning Coordinator Area

o There may be reliability functions not being performed because of gaps

Planning Coordinator Gaps Issue

WECC Staff Observations and PCC Efforts

16

• In WECC, currently Planning Coordinator gaps create more of a compliance risk than a reliability risko Many functions duplicative of Transmission Planner

functionso Area Coordinators created for data collectiono Interconnection-wide coordinated plans (UFLS)

• The list of registered Planning Coordinators almost the same as list of registered Balancing Authorities

WECC Staff Observations

17

• Gaps not prevalent in regions where ISO/RTOs exist

• Reluctance to be a Planning Coordinator is often tied to liability concerns

• More Reliability Standards applicable to the Planning Coordinator are being developed…

WECC Staff Observations (cont.)

18

• Passed final ballot in December 2013• NERC Board approval February 2014• Requires data providers to submit power flow,

dynamics, and short-circuit data to their Planning Coordinator and Transmission Planner

MOD-032 Standard Development Update

19

Base Case Data Submittal Process (current and general)

Generator Owner

Transmission Owner

Resource Planner

Transmission Planner

Area Coordinator WECC

20

Base Case Data Submittal Process (MOD-032)

21

• October 2013: PCC asks WECC staff to develop a list mapping Transmission Owners and Generator Owners to Planning Coordinators

• December 2013: System Review Work Group survey conducted to identify facilities not in a Planning Coordinator Areao PCs asked to respond to surveyo Still collecting and compiling responses

Planning Coordination Committee (PCC) Effort

22

Planning Coordinator PreliminarySurvey Results as of 3-11-14

23

“Arizona” Area Unclaimed Buses

91

59

35

1 1

Generator OwnedSWTCFEUNMIID

24

“Northwest” Area Unclaimed Buses

115

4

8

12

121 20

Generator OwnedCity of CentraliaAvistaJCPUDMFROTC IdahoFirst WindOP&L

25

“Montana/WAPA UM” Area Unclaimed Buses

9

4

1

Generator ownedNorthwesternHill Co Elec

26

“PSCo/WAPA RM” Area Unclaimed Buses

9

420

711

128

8

94

27

16 237 9

Generator Owned Tri StateWest PlainsEMAPAC EWAPA LMWapa UCBlack HillsPSCOIMPlatte RiverBasin

27

“California” Area Unclaimed Buses

33

60

46

2226

4

2312

33

4

87

3Metro WD

Redding

Silicon VP

USBR

Roseville

CA-OR Trans

NCPA

NextEra

Calpine

San Francisco

Shasta Lake

Modesto

Merced ID

Branden Sudduth

WECC

branden@wecc.biz

801.883.6888

Questions?

29

• What is the role of the Transmission Planner (TP) vs. Planning Coordinator (PC)?

• Who should be a TP?• Who should be a PC? Who should they be

a PC for?• How should TP and PC area boundaries be

determined?

Defining the Problem

30

• What concerns do entities have relative to being a PC?

• How formalized should PC arrangements be?

• What are a PC’s responsibilities for Generator Owners (non-TO)?

• What can WECC do to help facilitate the resolution of PC gaps?

Formulating a Proposal

31

Review of Action Items

Action Item Status Completion Date