Brain Ultrasound in neonates - Radiographia.ru · Pediatric neurosonography predominately relies on...

Preview:

Citation preview

Brain Ultrasound in neonates and infants:

still an important first line imaging

Riccabona MichaelUniversity Hospital Graz, Austria

LKH - Universitätsklinikum LKH - Universitätsklinikum

Lviv

2011

Established applications, value of Doppler-US + new aspects

• Basic neurosonography– well established

• New applications & modern techniques − broadened US potential

• Doppler & (amplitude coded) color Doppler US• high resolution US (HR)• harmonic imaging (HI)

Lviv 2011

New aspects & new US methods• increasingly integrated into standard imaging

− transcranial approach (TCI)− spinal canal

+ extended view − US of the infants orbit & skull− contrast-enhanced US− 3DUS

Established applications, value of Doppler-US + new aspects

Lviv 2011

IntroductionPediatric neurosonography predominately relies on

• transfontanellar US– for viewing the neonatal brain, including DS= modality of choice for bedside assessment

Many clinically important indications established

• small part US of the spinal canal– for evaluating the neonatal spinal canal

Lviv 2011

Basic US requisites

• Sector array: transfontanellar & transtemporal

• Linear array: brain surface, skull, orbit, spine …

• Knowledge & experience & prudent skill– mind: low output (Watt) = low MI/TI– aim at short investigation time in preterm babies!

• Frequency: 15 / 10 - 2 MHz– for (N)ICU: (a)CDS / PW-DDS capabilities

+ transfontanellar & axial / transtemporal views

Lviv 2011

Normal brain US images

• (para-) sagittalStandardized & comprehensive assessment

• coronal

Lviv 2011

Normal brain US imagesStandardized & comprehensive documentation

Lviv 2011

Additinal sections• Brain surface => HR-US, linear transducer

– compulsory in special conditions

Lviv 2011

Additinal sections

• infarction• „battered child“• thrombosis• gyration disorders

• Brain surface => HR-US, linear transducer– compulsory in special conditions

Lviv 2011

Additinal sections

• infarction• „battered child“• thrombosis• gyration disorders

• Axial acquisition => sector Tdx– helpful, lower frequencye.g., extra-axial collections

brain stem & posterior fossa, …

• Brain surface => HR-US, linear transducer– compulsory in special conditions

Lviv 2011

How to measure• Standardized sections

– all pathology• in 2 planes

Lviv 2011

How to measure• Standardized sections

– all pathology• in 2 planes

Lviv 2011

How to measure• Standardized sections

– all pathology• in 2 planes

- essentialfollow-up

Lviv 2011

How to measure• Standardized sections

– all pathology• in 2 planes

- essentialfor follow upmedico-legal aspects, …

- use „landmarks“as a reference

e.g. midline structures, …

Lviv 2011

Typical US findings

• PVE / PVLin preterm babies – apnoea, hypoxia, low RR, …

Lviv 2011

Typical US findings

• US findings:– periventricular echogenicity– particularly suspicious if

– patchy, – inhomogeneous, – asymmetrical …

• PVE / PVLin preterm babies – apnoea, hypoxia, low RR, …

Lviv 2011

Typical US findings

• Initially often difficult to differentate– may be normal in immaturity

clue to diagnosis => follow-up (cysts, …)

• US findings:– periventricular echogenicity– patchy, inhomogeneous, …

• PVE / PVLin preterm babies – apnoea, hypoxia, low RR, …

Lviv 2011

Most frequent query: IVH• Typical in preterm babies

– vary with gestational age

Lviv 2011

Most frequent query: IVH

DD: plexus bleedcongested plexus

• Typical in preterm babies– vary with gestational age

• SEB = IVH I°

Lviv 2011

Most frequent query: IVH

• IVH II° + III°

DD: plexus bleedcongested plexus

IVH III + PVH

• Typical in preterm babies– vary with gestational age

• SEB = IVH I°

• III + secondary PVH= IVH IV° in old terminology

Lviv 2011

Most frequent query: IVH

• IVH II° + III°

• IVH III + secondary PVHhydrocephalus & cysts

DD: plexus bleedcongested plexus

• Typical in preterm babies– vary with gestational age

• SEB = IVH I°

Lviv 2011

Most frequent query: IVH

DD: hemorrhagic infraction for other reasons

DD: plexus bleedcongested plexus

• Typical in preterm babies– vary with gestational age

• SEB = IVH I°

• IVH II° + III°

• IVH III + secondary PVH

Lviv 2011

Other cranial hemorrhages

• In a term neonate– brain stem bleed

Lviv 2011

Other cranial hemorrhages

• After traumae.g., cesarean section– tentorial hemorrhage

• In a term neonate– brain stem bleed

Lviv 2011

Other cranial hemorrhages

• After traumae.g., cesarean section– tentorial hemorrhage

• Secondary hemorrhage– hemorrhagic infarction– (vascular) malformation– tumor (lipoma), sinus thrombus ...

• In a term neonate– brain stem bleed

Lviv 2011

Hydrocephalus & atrophy• Posthemorrhagic findings: cysts• Hydrocephalus

– echogenic wall after bleed

Lviv 2011

Hydrocephalus & atrophy

– congenital brain malformation?• axial approach• occipital scan• AVM? - CDS

• Posthemorrhagic findings: cysts• Hydrocephalus

– echogenic wall after bleed

Lviv 2011

Hydrocephalus & atrophy

– congenital brain malformation?• axial & occipital approach, AVM?

– brain pressure & drainage need?• eye-US & DDS

• Posthemorrhagic findings: cysts• Hydrocephalus

– echogenic wall after bleed

Lviv 2011

Hydrocephalus & atrophy

– congenital brain malformation?• axial & accipital approach, AVM?

– brain pressure & drainage need?• eye-US & DDS

– DD: atrophy, subdural collection

• Posthemorrhagic findings: cysts• Hydrocephalus

– echogenic wall after bleed

Lviv 2011

Hydrocephalus & atrophy

= follow- up essential– for clinical course & DD (other cysts …)

– congenital brain malformation?• axial & occipital approach, AVM?

– brain pressure & drainage need?• eye-US & DDS

– DD: atrophy, subdural collection

• Posthemorrhagic findings: cysts• Hydrocephalus

– echogenic wall after bleed

Lviv 2011

US criteria in brain malformations

• Usually diagnosed prenatally– postnatal confirmation + follow-up + exact diagnosis

Lviv 2011

US criteria in brain malformations

• US-aspects:– corpus callosum

+ septum pellucidum?

– CSF spaces– posterior fossa!

• Usually diagnosed prenatally– postnatal confirmation + follow-up + exact diagnosis

Lviv 2011

US criteria in brain malformations

• US-aspects:– corpus callosum

+ septum pellucidum?

– CSF spaces– posterior fossa!– brain parenchyma => HR-US

• gyration? heterotopia? …

• Usually diagnosed prenatally– postnatal confirmation + follow-up + exact diagnosis

Lviv 2011

Other & unusual views / access• Occipital & nuchal

– posterior horn & posterior fossa

Lviv 2011

Other & unusual views / access

• Transtemporal + axial– great vessels + DDS / CDS

• comparison, …– brain stemm– extra-axial

collections

• Occipital & nuchal– posterior horn & posterior fossa

Lviv 2011

Other & unusual views / access

• Transtemporal + axial– great vessels + DDS / CDS

• comparison, …– brain stemm– extra-axial collections

• Occipital & nuchal– posterior horn & posterior fossa

• Older children– fontanella closed => allways TCI

Lviv 2011

Transfontanellar US• improved border definition

Modern US - HI in the brainLviv 2011

Transfontanellar US• improved border definition• depiction of focal lesions

– tumors, edema, abscess, …– hemorrhage, ...

Modern US - HI in the brainLviv 2011

Transfontanellar US• improved border definition• depiction of focal lesions

– tumors, edema, – hemorrhage, abscess, ...

Modern US - HI in the brain

• delineation of liquid structures– hydrocephalus, cysts, …– shunt, …

Lviv 2011

What about Doppler sonography= established + helpful tool

• Fontanellar approach- always use also duplex Doppler- perform spectral analysis

- allows for functional evaluation- not achievable by an other method

Lviv 2011

What about Doppler sonography= established + helpful tool

+ transtemporal CDS• Fontanellar approach

- allows for functional evaluation- not achievable by an other method

Lviv 2011

What about Doppler sonography

• Many indications– vessel anatomy– brain perfusion– DD liquid - vascular

= established + helpful tool

+ transtemporal• Fontanellar approach

- allows for functional evaluation- not achievable by an other method

Lviv 2011

e.g., AsphyxiaTypical development:

– initially normal

=> RI normal or– then hyperemia

Lviv 2011

e.g., AsphyxiaTypical development:

– initially normal

– increase in resistance=> Vdiast reduced => RI = • then Vsyst

• tent shaped diastoly

– then hyperemia=> RI normal or

Lviv 2011

e.g., AsphyxiaTypical development:

– initially normal

– undulating blood => no sufficient perfusion, brain death

– then hyperemia

• diastolic flow reversal

– increase in resistance=> Vdiast reduced => RI = • then Vsyst

• tent shaped diastoly

=> RI normal or

Lviv 2011

Older children => query brain death?• After every cerbral hypoxia, using TCI

– drowning, ...– bed side evaluation

Lviv 2011

DS in brain pressure• Flow pattern change with intracranial pressure

– basic-DDS => normal? – extracranial flow pattern?

• V syst, V diast, RI …

– standardized ACI-DDS• flow velocities increase with pressure• difference extra- & intracranial portion

Lviv 2011

DS in brain pressure• Flow pattern change with intracranial pressure

– basic-DDS => normal? – extracranial flow pattern?

• V syst, V diast, RI

– standardized ACI-DDS• flow velocities increase with pressure• difference extra- & intracranial• for velocity measurements:

ALWAYS apply angel correction

Lviv 2011

DS in brain pressure

– changes with fontanellar compressionV syst , RI

• Flow pattern change with intracranial pressure– basic-DDS => normal? – extracranial flow pattern?

• V syst, V diast, RI

– standardized ACI-DDS • flow velocities increase with pressure• difference extra- & intracranial portion• angle correction

Lviv 2011

Functional DDS• Note: flow pattern change with circulation

– with head position• SIDS • DD subclavian steel phenomenon

Lviv 2011

Functional DDS

– pCO2• respirator settings …

• Note: flow pattern change with circulation– with head position

• SIDS, DD subclavian steel

Lviv 2011

Functional DDS

– pCO2• respirator settings

– tachycardia• bradycardia …

• Note: flow pattern change with circulation– with head position

• SIDS, DD subclavian steel

– medication• cathecholamine, RR- drugs & inotrop medication., ...

Lviv 2011

Specific applications

• Peripheral vasculature– arteries & veins

• aCDS: less angle dependency

Lviv 2011

Specific applications

• Liquor flow– if CSF particles present

• Peripheral vasculature– arteries & veins

• aCDS: less angle dependency

Lviv 2011

Specific applications

• DD of structures– tumor– SDH versus atrophy

• Liquor flow– if CSF particles present

• Peripheral vasculature– arteries & veins

• aCDS: less angle dependency

Lviv 2011

Other findingsBrain US may give the clue to diagnosis• Look for these findings• Use all options

– infection & abscess– syndromatic disease

Lviv 2011

Other findingsBrain US may give the clue to diagnosis• Look for these findings• Use all options

– infection, abscess, syndromes– necrosis, …

Lviv 2011

Don‘t forget• Documentation

– measurements: Vsyst, Vend.diast, RI, TAV – angle correction (> 20°)– peripheral + central vessels

Lviv 2011

Don‘t forget

– including axial assessment– aCDS may be helpful (TCI)

• Arteries ACA, ACI, ACM, ACP, AB

• Documentation– measurements: Vsyst, Vend.diast, RI, TAV – angle correction (> 20°)– peripheral + central vessels

Lviv 2011

Don‘t forget

• And veins!!– V. Galeni, sup. sag. sinus, deep sinus, …

– including axial assessment– aCDS may be helpful (TCI)

• Arteries ACA, ACI, ACM, ACP, AB

• Documentation– measurements: Vsyst, Vend.diast, RI, TAV – angle correction (> 20°)– peripheral + central vessels

Lviv 2011

Echo-enhanced US of the brain• Rare indications in neonates

– DD: Tu versus blood clot (i.v. ce-US)=> increased conspicuity

Lviv 2011

Echo-enhanced US of the brain• Rare indications in neonates

– DD: Tu versus blood clot (i.v. ce-US)=> increased conspicuity

– intraluminal application• complicated hydrocephalus

Lviv 2011

Brain ee-US in older children

• Improve visualization=> see vessels

Lviv 2011

Brain ee-US in older children

• Improve visualization=> see vessels= capability to analyze

angle correction …

Lviv 2011

Brain ee-US in older children

• Improve visualization=> see vessels= capability to analyze

• Indications– brain perfusion

• after hypoxia• in tumors

– vascular malformation• follow-up

Lviv 2011

Finally: spinal US• Established in the neonatal & infant spine• Prerequisites:

– high resolution linear Tx

Lviv 2011

Finally: spinal US• Established in the neonatal & infant spine• Prerequisites:

– high resolution linear Tx– experience

– knowledge, training– helpful accessories:

• image compounding • split (double) image, m-mode

Lviv 2011

Finally: spinal US• Established in the neonatal & infant spine• Prerequisites:

– high resolution linear Tx

• extended field of view = panorama US

– experience– knowledge, training

– helpful accessories: • image compounding • split (double) image, m-mode

Lviv 2011

US technique

• neck slightly bent (occipital view)

• Dorsal approach– prone or decubitus position– blanket? pillow?

Lviv 2011

US technique

• neck slightly bent (occipital view)

• Dorsal approach– prone or decubitus position– blanket? pillow?

– continue upwards• Start sacral

Lviv 2011

US technique

• Start sacral– continue upwards

• neck slightly bent (occipital view)

• Dorsal approach– prone or decubitus position– blanket? pillow?

• Use unusual approch– ventral / transabdominal– fill bladder / colon

Lviv 2011

Extended US examination• Use modern techniques

– m-mode, extended field of view, 3DUS

• Know anatomy– normal variants

Lviv 2011

Extended US examination• Know anatomy & use modern techniques

– normal variant? m-mode, extended view, 3DUS

• Visualization of cranio-cervical junction– herniation of tonsils?– curved / sector array

Lviv 2011

Extended US examination• Know anatomy & use modern techniques

– normal variant? m-mode, extended view, 3DUS

• Visualization of cranio-cervical junction– herniation of tonsils?– curved / sector array

• If spinal pathology present + brain US– associated malformation? Hydro?– transfontanellar, transtemporal, …

Lviv 2011

Normal US findingsLviv 2011

Other important US indications

– linear array, hematoma?• Skull fracture

– look for tear drop leasions!

Lviv 2011

Other important US indications

• Extra-axial hemorrhage? – you may try US (axial!)

If unclear, SAH (tentorial) …=> CT!

Lviv 2011

Other important US indications

• Extra-axial hemorrhage? – you may try US (axial!!)– tentorial, unclear, SAH => CT?

– linear array, hematoma?– look for tear drop leasions!

• Skull fracture

• DD of uncertain (spine & brain) lesions– aCDS, axial view, move, ce-US, …

Lviv 2011

Other important US indications

• Extra-axial hemorrhage? – you may try US (axial!!)– tentorial, unclear, SAH => CT?

– linear array, hematoma?– look for tear drop leasions!

• Skull fracture

=> MRI …• DD of uncertain (spine & brain) lesions

– aCDS, axial view, move, ce-US, …

Lviv 2011

• Indications for skull film:– fracture & trauma – premature synostosis– skull defects …

When to use which modality?Lviv 2011

• Indications for skull film: – Fracture, trauma, premature synostosis, defects, …

When to use which modality?

• CT: – unclear US findings– acute severe (multiple) trauma – calcifications – bone pathology – CT-angiography– if no MRI available

Lviv 2011

• Indications for skull film: – fracture & trauma, premature synostosis, defects, …

When to use which modality?

• MRI:– malformations (heterotopia, gyration …) – metabolic disorders, …

• CT: – acute trauma, calcifications, ..– bone pathology, CT-angiography– if no MRI available

– asphyxia, trauma (late phase) / battered child, tumor …

Lviv 2011

Imaging algorithms

• Impact on therapy or prognosis = „evidence based“

• Patient oriented– adapted to local circumstances

• As little invasive / ionising as possible– ALARA - principle

• No examnination without valid indicatione.g., if US cannot answer query => CT / MR, NO US

Lviv 2011

e.g., birth trauma• What do we expect, what can we treat?

– asphyxia– hemorrhage

• tentorial, dural

Lviv 2011

e.g., birth trauma• What do we expect, what can we treat?

– asphyxia– hemorrhage– fractures / epiphysiolysis

• plain film • chest, clavicle, …

• US => epiphysis

Lviv 2011

e.g., birth trauma• What do we expect, what can we treat?

– asphyxia– hemorrhage

=> MRT! (delayed)

– spinal traumaUS = initial imaging • bed side

– fractures / epiphysiolysis• plain film (chest, clavicle, …)• US => epiphysis

Lviv 2011

Take away

• holds great diagnostic potential– though not yet all approaches & methods established

Modern US of the neonatal brain and spine

Lviv 2011

Take away

Modern US = valuable adjunct to conventional 2DUS

• holds great diagnostic potential– though not yet all approaches established

• improves already established value– & documentation

• provides valuable information

Modern US of the neonatal brain and spine

Lviv 2011

• Questions?• Comments?

Better ask me - otherwise I shall ask you …!

Lviv

2011

Lviv

2011

Recommended