Bob Hughes University of Brighton

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 1

New developments in IS/IT project management -towards a 3rd edition

Bob Hughes

School of Information Management, University of Brighton

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 2

Project management - flavour of the month?

Down-sizing

Delayering

Loss of organisationalintelligence

Loss of ability toimplement change

CHANGINGWORLD

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 3

Traditional careerprogression

programmer

systemsanalyst

project manager

In many bureaucratic organisations, all projects were IT projects

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 4

A different view of PM

Out-sourcing

Supplier side(technical management)

Customer side(contract management)

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 5

Some consequences

■ Growth in interest in PM■ Professional bodies

– Association for Project Management (UK)

– Project Management Institute (US)– developing bodies of knowledge (BOK)

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 6

More consequences

■ Qualifications– PMI, APM, ISEB, BCS Diploma, NVQ/SVQ,

Institute of Management

■ New kids on the block– DSDM (Dynamic Systems Development

Method) project manager examination– ISEB Programme and Project Support

Office qualification

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 7

More consequences■ ‘Standards’

– PRINCE 2 - CCTA, APM etc.,– BS 6079 - British Standards Institution

– ISO 10006– ISO 12207

■ Backdoor approach to getting some structure back - Programme Management and Project Support Office

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 8

Programme management

Programme brief

‘Vision statement’

‘Blueprint’ projects

Project portfolio

Benefits managementsuccess = good development + good operation

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 9

PRINCE2 versus BS6079

PRINCE ■ procedures■ neologisms■ products■ project delivers

products

BS6079■ techniques (e.g.

NPV, EVA)■ traditional

terminology■ activities■ ‘project’ includes

operation

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 10

Earned value analysisPhase

Module DesignEst

DesignActual

CodeEst

CodeActual

TestEst

TestAct.

A 10 15 20 20 10 n/a

B 10 10 15 17 12 n/a

C 20 late 31 late 18 n/a

EV

Est. tots2040

3566 40

%EV = 55/146* 100 i.e 37.7%

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 11

New paradigms: DSDMthe nine characteristics■ active user involvement■ development team empowerment■ frequent product delivery■ business fitness is key■ iterative/incremental development

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 12

DSDM characteristics - contd.■ All changes reversible■ requirement set at high level only■ testing integrated throughout life-cycle■ collaboration between stakeholders

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 13

project management implications of DSDM

■ control on products and requirements■ time-boxing: fixed time-scales - contrast

with critical chain■ need to manage and motivate user

involvement■ MORE management needed not less

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 14

Grady Booch

■ Projects can be driven primarily by– calendar– requirements

– documentation– quality– architecture

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 15

DSDM and the Booch taxonomy■ RAD/DSDM seems to be essentially

– calendar driven i.e. ‘characterized by an obsessive focus on schedule’

■ Risks with calendar driven approach– chaotic development methods– lack of ‘business sustainability’ (e.g.

scaleability, extensibility etc.)

– long-term stress and demotivation

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 16

DSDM and Booch contd.

■ RAD/DSDM also seems to be requirements driven - ‘rigid focus on the system’s outwardly observable behaviour’

■ Risks– lack of motivation to deal with sustainabilty– architecture: large number of independent

functional components

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 17

Requirements vs architecture drivenSystem functions

Common infrastructureCommon infrastructure

System functions

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 18

Booch’s five habits of good OO projects

■ ruthless focus on providing essential minimum requirements

■ focus on results■ effective use of OO modelling■ strong architectural vision■ well-managed iterative/incremental

development life cycle

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 19

Effect of alternative paradigmsRAD/DSDM - iterations - how do we control them?Still need management milestones

Hide it withinprocess

Or make each iterationa project

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 20

Note also

■ Effect on metrics - different units of software

■ Reuse - being decoupled from OO

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 21

The dispersed project - Situational factors e.g.■ common/different organizations■ central/dispersed authority■ criticality■ motivation■ common culture■ ease of communication■ language■ shared resources incl. data

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 22

Freedom/constraint cycle FREEDOM

CONSTRAINT

orientation

trust building

goal setting

commitment

implementation

highperformance

renewal

Same tim

e/place

Same tim

e

Diff

eren

t tim

e/pl

ace

Same

time

/pla

ce

Bob Hughes University of Brighton 23

Future developments?■ Synergies with CSCW?■ Limits to project management?

experiments projects routines

analogies case-basedreasoning

parametricmodels