Benchmarking Competitiveness in Newfoundland and Labrador - Innovation...

Preview:

Citation preview

conferenceboard.ca

Charting a Course to Prosperity:Benchmarking the Competitiveness of Newfoundland and Labrador

April 8, 2016

Pedro Antunes

Deputy Chief Economist

The Conference Board of Canada

2

1. Overview of Newfoundland and Labrador Economic Performance

2. Jurisdiction Selection and Benchmarking Methodology

3. Benchmarking Results

4. Challenges and Opportunities: Policy Recommendations

Outline

3

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

NL PEI NS NB Que Ont Man Sask Alta BC

2004-14

Real per Capita GDP Growth by Provinceaverage annual compound growth, per cent

Sources: Statistics Canada; The Conference Board of Canada.

4

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

NL PEI NS NB Que Ont Man Sask Alta BC

2004-14

Real Wage Gains by Province.per cent change over the period

Sources: Statistics Canada; The Conference Board of Canada.

5

Where are oil prices headed?

• Excess supply remains an issue—Saudi Arabia

fixated on regaining market share

• Iran’s production of 3-4 million barrels per day is

adding to the glut

• Iraq also supplying more oil to the market than

expected

• Despite oversupply, oil prices have recovered lately

• Still, we don’t expect to see WTI at US$50 until 2018

6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16f 17f 18f 19f

Where are oil prices headed? WTI Crude Price, US$ per barrel

Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis The Conference Board of Canada.

59%

drop

7

• Energy and resource investment heavily cut back

• Domestic economy is losing momentum

• Manufacturing will continue to ramp up

• Oil production will not contribute much to the

economy until Hebron starts producing in 2018

Newfoundland and Labrador Outlook

8

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15f 16f 17f

Newfoundland and Labrador Constructionper cent change, $2007

Sources: The Conference Board of Canada ; Statistics Canada.

9

-30.0

-25.0

-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15f 16f 17f

Newfoundland and Labrador Metal Miningper cent change, $2007.

Sources: The Conference Board of Canada ; Statistics Canada.

10

-30.0

-25.0

-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15f 16f 17f 18f 19f 20f

Newfoundland and Labrador Oil Industryper cent change, $2007.

Sources: The Conference Board of Canada ; Statistics Canada.

11

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15f 16f 17fSources: The Conference Board of Canada; Statistics Canada.

Newfoundland and Labrador Real GDP(per cent change, $2007)

12

• The main impediment to economic growth in the province will be the demographic situation

• An aging population and the need for infrastructure spending will also put pressure on the provincial budget

• Better productivity and diversifying economic growth would help

• A focus on immigration and training would be a good place to start

Challenges Ahead for Newfoundland and Labrador

13

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

2015 2035

Population distribution by age, 2015and 2035

Sources: The Conference Board of Canada; Statistics Canada.

14

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

1981-90 1991-00 2001-05 2006-10 2011-20f 2021-30f 2031-35f

Newfoundland and Labrador: Labour Force average annual compound growth, per cent

Sources: Statistics Canada; The Conference Board of Canada.

15

Sources: Canadian Institute of Health Information, The Conference Board of Canada and Statistics Canada.

Average Public Health Expenditures in 2013 by Age and Population Change by Cohort

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Health care spending by age (000 $) Population change (per cent 2015-19)

16

Contributions to Growth in Health Care Spending. average annual compound growth rate

Total Health Care Spending 5.6

Contributions:

Changes in access 1.0

Demographic changes 1.8

Population growth 0.8

Aging 1.0

Inflation 2.9

NOTE: Numbers may not add due to rounding Source: The Conference Board of Canada.

17

-2,500

-2,000

-1,500

-1,000

-500

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

2003/04 2005/06 2007/08 2009/10 2011/12 2013/14 2015/16 2017/18 2019/20

Surplus (Deficit) Royalties - Offshore oil

N.L.’s: Public Accounts$ millions

Source: Budget 2015 and Fall Update, Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Finance.

18

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Net Debt (left scale) Debt financing costs (right scale)

N.L.’s: Debt Beginning to Climb AgainNet public debt and debt financing costs as a per cent of GDP

Source: Budget 2015 and Fall Update, Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Finance.

19

Charting a Course to Prosperity…

• Viewing the supply side of the economy

through a production function approach

• Our productive capacity depends on:

the amount and type of capital,

the amount and quality of labour and

the efficiency with which capital and labour

mix to produce output

20

What is Efficiency/Productivity?

Over time is a key determinant of income levels

in an economy

Contributes directly to labour productivity—

output per hour worked

Capital stock per worker is the other defining

component of labour productivity

21

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

NL PEI NS NB Que Ont Man Sask Alta BC

Previous decade 2004-2014

Canada 20-year average U.S 20-year average

Labour Productivity Growth by Provinceaverage annual compound growth, per cent

Sources: Statistics Canada; The Conference Board of Canada.

22

Competitiveness and Labour Productivity Determinants Framework

Source: The Conference Board of Canada.

23

• Comparator jurisdiction need to be:

–direct market competitors to the province (i.e. same goods exports to same markets), and

–face similar business operating environment. (i.e. this rules out middle eastern oil-producing countries.)

• Industrial structure, rural population dispersion, population ageing, and the size of the economy were also considered.

Jurisdiction Selection Methodology

24

Source: The Conference Board of Canada.

Finalized Jurisdiction List

Alberta Texas*

Saskatchewan North Dakota*

Quebec United Kingdom

Nova Scotia Norway

New Brunswick

* U.S. national data were used when

data for Texas and North Dakota

were not available.

25

Sources: OECD; Statistics Canada; U.S. Bureau of Economic Accounts; The Conference Board of Canada.

BIG PICTURE Indicators

Indicator

Newfoundland

and Labrador's

Grade

Newfoundland

and Labrador's

Rank

Real gross domestic product (GDP)

per capita (2013 level)C 6/10

Growth in real GDP per capita

(growth compounded over 2008-

2013)

D 8/10

Labour productivity (GDP per hours

worked) (2013 level) B 5/10

Growth in labour productivity

(growth compounded over 2008-

2013)

D 10/10

26

Sources: OECD; Statistics Canada; The Conference Board of Canada

Innovation Indicators

Indicator

Newfoundland

and Labrador's

Grade

Newfoundland

and Labrador's

Rank

Business expenditures on research

and development as a percent of

GDP (2007-2011 average)

D 8/10

Government expenditures on

research and development as a

percent of GDP (2007-2011

average)

C 7/10

Patent applications per million

people (2006-2010 average)D 10/10

27

Sources: OECD; Statistics Canada; The Conference Board of Canada.

Business sector R&D spending as a proportion of GDP(per cent; competitor average is unweighted)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

2001 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11

Newfoundland and Labrador Competitor Average

28

* Due to data availability Texas and North Dakota were replaced with the U.S. national data.

Sources: fDi Markets; OECD; Statistics Canada; The Conference Board of Canada.

Investment Indicators

Indicator

Newfoundland

and Labrador's

Grade

Newfoundland

and Labrador's

Rank

Investment in machinery and

equipment as a per cent of GDP D 5/9*

Investment in non-residential

structures as a per cent of GDPC 4/9*

Inward Greenfield Foreign Direct

Investment A 1/9*

Government investment in gross fixed

capital formation (provincial

comparison only)

-8/10

provinces

Average age of public infrastructure

(provincial comparison only)-

9/10

provinces

29

01234567

Sources: Statistics Canada; OECD; The Conference Board of Canada.

Investment in machinery and equipment, 2008-2012 averageinvestment of m & e as a percentage of GDP

30

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

Sources: fDi Markets; The Conference Board of Canada.

Inward foreign direct investment, 2008-2012 averageinward greenfield FDI performance index

31

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

PEI NB NS Que Man Ont BC Alta NL Sask

Sources: Statistics Canada; The Conference Board of Canada.

Government investment in Gross Fixed Capital Formation, 2004-2013 averagegovernment investment as a share of GDP

32

* Due to data availability Texas and North Dakota were replaced with the U.S. national data.

Sources: Statistics Canada; OECD; American Community Survey; World Bank; Council of Ministers of Education Canada; U.S. Bureau of Labor

Statistics; U.S. Census Bureau; Statistics Norway; UK's Office for National Statistics; The Conference Board of Canada.

Human Capital Indicators

Part 1: Education and Skills

Indicator N.L.’s Grade N.L.'s Rank

University completion D 9/10

College completion B 5/9*

Science, math, computer science

and engineering graduatesB 3/9*

Apprenticeship completion - 6/10 provinces

Student skills C 4/9*

Adult skills D 9/9*

33

Sources: Statistics Canada; OECD; The Conference Board of Canada.

College completion, 2011Percentage of the population aged 25 to 64 that has a college degree

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

34

Sources: Statistics Canada; The Conference Board of Canada.

Apprenticeship completions as a share of the labour force, 2008-2012 averageper cent

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

Alta. Sask. B.C. Que. Man. N.L. N.B. Ont. P.E.I. N.S.

35

* Due to data availability Texas and North Dakota were replaced with the U.S. national data.

Sources: Statistics Canada; OECD; American Community Survey; World Bank; Council of Ministers of Education Canada; U.S. Bureau of Labor

Statistics; U.S. Census Bureau; Statistics Norway; UK's Office for National Statistics; The Conference Board of Canada.

Human Capital Indicators

Part 2: Labour Market

Indicator N.L.’s Grade N.L.’s Rank

Labour Force Participation D 9/10

Employment Growth C 4/10

Unemployment Rate D 10/10

Unit Labour Cost Growth D 9/9*

Work Stoppages Due To Strikes

and LockoutsC 8/9*

Population Aging D 9/9*

Net Migration D 8/10

36

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Sources: OECD; Statistics Canada; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; The Conference Board of Canada.

Unemployment rate, 2013percent of labour force that is unemployed

37

* Due to data availability Texas and North Dakota were replaced with the U.S. national data.

** No Norwegian data were available for four indicators.

Sources: OECD; Canada Revenue Agency; KPMG; Statistics Canada; U.S. Bureau of Economic Accounts; Employment and Social Development

Canada; UN International Labour Organization; UK Office for National Statistics; Statistics Norway; University of Calgary School of Public

Policy; The Conference Board of Canada.

Business and Policy Environment Indicators

Indicator N.L.’s Grade N.L.’s Rank

Provincial Corporate Income Taxes - 8/10 provinces

Marginal Effective Tax Rate on

CapitalA 3/9*

Taxes Levied on Businesses A 3/9**

Statutory Labour Costs B 5/9**

Transportation Costs D 9/9**

Utility Costs D 7/9**

Net Provincial Debt - 5/10 provinces

38

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Sources: University of Calgary School of Public Policy; The Conference Board of Canada.

Marginal Effective Tax Rate on Capital, 2013per cent

39

Strengthening the building blocks of productivity growth by focusing policies on:

• Innovation—enhancing the development and adoption of new products and processes.

• Investment—building the stock and quality of physical capital.

• Human capital—enriching the province’s labour force.

• Business and policy environment—policies must be competitive, efficient, and fiscally prudent.

Challenges and Opportunities: Policy Recommendations

40

• Increase in competition results in increased innovation.

• Increasing competition can be accomplished through:

–Government procurement strategies

–Lowering interprovincial and international trade barriers

Innovation Policies

41

Sources: Chen and Mintz (University of Calgary); The Conference Board of Canada.

Subsidies and Credits Distort Capital Allocation

(2013 Marginal effective tax rates on capital; per cent)

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

Newfoundland and Labrador Alberta

42

• Broaden the tax base by eliminating or reducing preferential tax treatment and use these additional revenue to reduce the overall corporate tax rate.

–Compliance costs would decrease and investments would be allocated to more efficient uses.

• Government increase infrastructure investment, but make sure timing is right and they are not competing for labour with private sector.

Investment Policies

43

• Increase training/education:

• Support students/apprentices financially through grants and loans.

• Connect high school students with opportunities & improve career guidance.

• Businesses can increase on-the-job training.

• Attract migrants:

• Recognize credentials & training across provinces.

• Do a better job at “selling” NFLD to potential migrants.

• Target migrants with skill sets req’d in labour force.

Human Capital Policies

44

• Engage older workforce:

–Workplaces that encourage part-time or casual work to prolong retirement.

–Changing retirement age or linking it to life expectancy.

–Phased-in public sector retirement benefits.

–Employer sponsored training opportunities (w govt subsidy?)

• Engage women in workforce:

–Incentive programs for women joining apprenticeships.

–Childcare support.

Human Capital Policies

45

• Current fiscal situation is not sustainable: expenditures are outpacing revenues and debt is beginning to climb again.

• Spending needs to be prioritized and efficiencies and innovations made.

• A balance needs to be found regarding:

• every day program spending (such as health and education),

• public infrastructure investments,

• savings (i.e. creating a sovereign wealth fund),

• debt repayment.

Fiscal Policies

46

Relying on oil revenues to pay everyday expenses is troubling for two reasons:

1. price and market volatility can cause unpredictability.

2. non-renewable resource = temporary revenue.

Sovereign wealth funds mitigate both issues.

• NL should put aside a portion of resource revenue into a Fund, then live off interest from Fund as revenue.

Fiscal Policies

47

Core Message on Business Innovation in Canada—Lack of investments in innovation not fundamental issue in Canada

Issue: Innovation Management

… and LEADERSHIP

nurturing a Culture of Entrepreneurship

and pursuing Innovation

comprehensively, competitively and

methodically

with the right metrics to ensure

value!

48

49

1. Citizens will need to upgrade their skills and education to reap the full benefits of this prosperous time.

2. Companies will need to invest in both employee training and in capital and machinery to increase productivity and competitiveness.

3. Government should prioritize spending, reduce debt, and create a competitive, equitable, and efficient taxation environment to attract new businesses and ensure future generations benefit from the oil wealth.

Conclusion

conferenceboard.ca

Recommended