Attracting funding and support - West Sussex Cycle Summit · action on HGV danger –Positive...

Local cycling strategies:Attracting funding and support

Roger GeffenPolicy DirectorCycling UK

About Cycling UK

• Founded 1878, c64,000 members

• Cycling activities, membership services (legal, insurance, magazine)

• Campaigning nationally and locally

• Cycling development e.g. cycle training, projects for under-represented / disadvantaged groups

Background to the Cycling & Walking

Investment Strategy (CWIS)

• ‘Get Britain Cycling’ parliamentary inquiry (2013): called for

– Leadership: Cross-Governmental commitment to increase cycling from 2% to 10% of trips by 2025, and to 25% by 2050

– Funding: £10 per person annually, rising to £20

– Design: consistent high-quality “cycle-proofing”

– Safety: e.g. traffic law and enforcement, action on HGV danger

– Positive promotion: e.g. cycle training

• Gov’t response (after much pressure!)

– Legally binding commitment to a Cycling & Walking Investment Strategy in Infrastructure Act 2015

CWIS: what it contains

• Admirable ambition: to normalise walking and cycling by 2040.

• Weak target: to double cycle use by 2025.

• Funding: £1.2bn over 5 years, of which £316m is direct from Gov’t. Rest is “expected” from councils (Local Transport Plans) & Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs).

• Localism: LAs encouraged (not required) to prepare Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans (LCWIPs). Reluctance to set design standards.

• Other actions: on safety (20mph, cycle training), infrastructure (new guidelines?), behaviour change.

Supporting LCWIPs

Guidance on Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans (LCWIPs) issued along with CWIS. Urges LAs to:• Plan networks for cycling & walking (use Propensity

to Cycle Tool – pct.bike).• Prioritise schemes.• Seek funding: LTP, LGF, s106 / CIL etc, look for

synergies with other plans.• Integrate with other strategies (e.g. LTP,

development documents).

DfT has offered LAs support in drawing up LCWIPs.We’ve revived Space for Cycling campaign to complement it.

What are we calling for?

Space for Cycling encourages councils to:•Plan – Plan a full network of cycle-friendly routes

•Invest – Actively seek the funding to implement the network

•Build – Build the network using the most up-to-date high quality design standards

Cheshire East Council first to sign up (before we even asked councils to do so!)

Toolkit for local advocates to contribute.

Step 1: Plan

Local councils and/or advocates can create ‘tube maps’ using PCT and template

Very effective way to mobilise political support (and hence funding!)

Step 2: prioritise investment

https://www.cyclescape.org/ Visualisations

Involving local communities / advocacy groups provides

evidence of need and public support – this too can help

secure funding!

Step 3: Build

…to high standards!

…as spelled out in our booklet

Space for Cycling: a guide for decision-makers

(download from www.cyclinguk.org/space4cycling)

What does Space for Cyclingmean in practice?

A range of solutions to create safe, direct, coherent, comfortable and attractive cycling conditions for all local journeys.

In general:

• Protected space for cycling along or across major roads / junctions.

• Low traffic volumes and speeds in town or city centres, in residential neighbourhoods, and on rural lanes.

• Traffic-free routes using parks and open spaces or rights of way – to complement (not substitute for) a cycle-friendly road network

Protected space:The faster and heavier the traffic

The greater the protection needed

Junction priority is crucial:New rules needed?

• Most EU countries’ rules give priority to peds/ cyclists going straight over vehicles turning across their path.

• London, Brighton, Nottingham etc are showing what can be done with good design – but we’d welcome more pilots of truly continental solutions.

Light traffic at low speeds

• Lower speeds: 20mph the norm for most urban streets, 40mph or less for rural lanes

• Limit (through) traffic in town centres, local streets and rural lanes

• Community-friendly design better than intrusive traffic calming

Routes free of motor traffic

• Good widths, surfaces, maintenance, signing

• Generally better not to segregate peds and cyclists, if peds are wandering or playing (rather than walking purposefully)

• Avoid access controls – or else make them Equality Act compliant (clearly visible / reflective bollards will do!)

Finding the funding

• Use opportunities from new developments and planned maintenance: road resurfacing is an opportunity for a cycle-friendly redesign

We’re here to help!

• Vote Bike: enlisted support from local election candidates.

• Post election: urging councils to commit to “Plan, Invest, Build”.

• LCWIP support package: DfT funding for C-UK, Sustrans and

Living Streets to support selected LAs in drafting LCWIPs.

• Promoting dialogue: agreement over plans / priorities will help LAs secure funding

Local cycling strategies:Attracting funding and support

Roger GeffenPolicy DirectorCycling UK