Action Dynamics of Social Construal

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Action Dynamics of Social Construal. Jon Freeman Dartmouth College. Computer mouse-tracking. Freeman & Ambady (2010), Behavior Research Methods. Computer mouse-tracking. MALE. MALE. FEMALE. MALE. MALE. FEMALE. MALE. MALE. FEMALE. CONTINUOUS ATTRACTION. MALE. MALE. FEMALE. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Action Dynamics of Social Construal

Jon FreemanDartmouth College

Computer mouse-tracking

Freeman & Ambady (2010), Behavior Research Methods

Computer mouse-tracking

MALE FEMALE

MALE FEMALE

MALE FEMALE

MALE

MALE

MALE FEMALE

MALE FEMALE

MALE FEMALE

MALE

MALE

FEMALE

FEMALE

MALEFEMALE

MALE

CONTINUOUSATTRACTION

Freeman, Ambady, Rule, & Johnson (2008), JEP: General

Real-time sex categorization

Freeman, Ambady, Rule, & Johnson (2008), JEP: General

Real-time sex categorization

multiple perceptual cues trigger multiple categories that

dynamically compete over time

Mouse-tracking measures

Maximum Deviation

ATTRACTION

Freeman, Ambady, Rule, & Johnson (2008), JEP: General

Real-time sex categorization

Freeman et al. (2010), Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Dynamic competition in race categorization

Freeman & Ambady (2011), Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Dissociable time-course information

pigmentation shape

Continuous face-voice interaction

Freeman & Ambady (2011), Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

“My family’s origins are pretty interesting.”

feminine male voice

Continuous face-voice interaction

Freeman & Ambady (2011), Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

masculine male voice

feminine female voice masculine female voice

FEMALE MALE

CONTINUOUSATTRACTION

Continuous face-voice interaction

Freeman & Ambady (2011), Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

ongoing voice processing continuously interacts with

ongoing face processing over time

face voicebody

affective states

goals and motivationprior

knowledge and stereotypes

process

Stereotype activation

“men are aggressive”

“women are docile”

multiple perceptual cues

multiple social categories

multiple stereotypes?

Dynamic category and stereotype activation

MALE FEMALEMALE FEMALEMALE FEMALEMALE

aggressiveaggressiv

eaggressiv

eaggressiv

edociledociledocile

Freeman & Ambady (2009), Psychological Science

docile

Stereotype activation

docileaggressive

stereotypes tied to multiple categories are simultaneously

activated

Freeman, Penner, Saperstein, Scheutz, & Ambady (2011), PLoS ONE

Top-down impact of stereotypes

Freeman, Penner, Saperstein, Scheutz, & Ambady (2011), PLoS ONE

Top-down impact of stereotypes

Contextual influences on person perception

Freeman (2013), Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Contextual influences on person perception

Freeman (2013), Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Normative context:

Counter-normative context:

Contextual influences on person perception

Freeman (2013), Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Contextual influences on person perception

Freeman (2013), Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

>> individual differences?

Contextual influences on person perception

Freeman, Ma, Han, & Ambady (2013), JESP

Contextual influences on person perception

Contextual influences on person perception

Freeman, Ma, Han, & Ambady (2013), JESP

process

stimulus

motor trajectory response

Conclusions

Recommended