View
221
Download
2
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Page 1 - DECLARATION OF SHEILA H. POTTER IN SUPPORT OF STATE AND COUNTYDEFENDANTS’ JOINT RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO INTERVENE
SP3/cjw/5219869-v1
Department of Justice1515 SW Fifth Ave, Suite 410
Portland, OR 97201(971) 673-1880 / Fax: (971) 673-5000
ELLEN F. ROSENBLUMAttorney GeneralSHEILA H. POTTER #993485Deputy Chief Trial CounselANNA M. JOYCE #013112Solicitor GeneralMARY WILLIAMS #911241Special Assistant Attorney GeneralDepartment of Justice1515 SW Fifth Ave, Suite 410Portland, OR 97201Telephone: (971) 673-1880Fax: (971) 673-5000Email: Sheila.Potter@doj.state.or.us
anna.joyce@doj.state.or.usmary_h_williams@msn.com
Attorneys for State Defendants
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
DEANNA L. GEIGER and JANINE M.NELSON; ROBERT DUEHMIG andWILLIAM GRIESAR,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHN KITZHABER, in his official capacityas Governor of Oregon; ELLENROSENBLUM, in her official capacity asAttorney General of Oregon; JENNIFERWOODWARD, in her official capacity asState Registrar, Center for Health Statistics,Oregon Health Authority; and RANDYWALDRUFF, in his official capacity asMultnomah County Assessor,
Defendants.
Case No. 6:13-cv-01834-MC(Lead Case)
DECLARATION OF SHEILA H. POTTER INSUPPORT OF STATE AND COUNTYDEFENDANTS’ JOINT RESPONSE TO THEMOTION TO INTERVENE
Case 6:13-cv-01834-MC Document 104 Filed 05/02/14 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 980
Page 2 - DECLARATION OF SHEILA H. POTTER IN SUPPORT OF STATE AND COUNTYDEFENDANTS’ JOINT RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO INTERVENE
SP3/cjw/5219869-v1
Department of Justice1515 SW Fifth Ave, Suite 410
Portland, OR 97201(971) 673-1880 / Fax: (971) 673-5000
PAUL RUMMELL and BENJAMINWEST; LISA CHICKADONZ andCHRISTINE TANNER; BASIC RIGHTSEDUCATION FUND,
Plaintiffs,v.
JOHN KITZHABER, in his official capacityas Governor of Oregon; ELLENROSENBLUM, in her official capacity asAttorney General of Oregon; JENNIFERWOODWARD, in her official capacity asState Registrar, Center for Health Statistics,Oregon Health Authority; and RANDYWALDRUFF, in his official capacity asMultnomah County Assessor,
Defendants.
Case No. 6:13-cv-02256-TC
I, Sheila H. Potter, declare:
1. I am one of the attorneys for state defendants John Kitzhaber, Ellen Rosenblum,
and Jennifer Woodward. I make the following statements of my own knowledge.
2. The state defendants’ answer to the Rummell complaint was filed on February 20,
2014; it contained a paragraph stating that the state defendants would not defend the ban on
same-sex marriages under the Oregon constitution but would continue enforcing the ban. After
the Answer was filed, the Attorney General held a press conference and issued a statement to
announce publicly that the state defendants would continue to appear in the case and would
explain their analysis, but that the analysis would not articulate any defense to the same-sex
marriage ban. (An accurate copy of that press release is attached to this Declaration as Exhibit 1;
see Ex. 1.)
3. The National Organization for Marriage issued a press release in response on the
same day, in which NOM president Brian Brown commented specifically on the Attorney
Case 6:13-cv-01834-MC Document 104 Filed 05/02/14 Page 2 of 8 Page ID#: 981
Page 3 - DECLARATION OF SHEILA H. POTTER IN SUPPORT OF STATE AND COUNTYDEFENDANTS’ JOINT RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO INTERVENE
SP3/cjw/5219869-v1
Department of Justice1515 SW Fifth Ave, Suite 410
Portland, OR 97201(971) 673-1880 / Fax: (971) 673-5000
General’s announcement that she would not defend the ban and articulated his disagreement with
her decision:
“Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum is shamefully abandoning her
constitutional duty to defend the marriage amendment
overwhelmingly enacted by the people of Oregon. She swore an
oath of office that she would enforce all the laws, not just those she
personally agrees with. The people are entitled to a vigorous
defense of the laws they enact, and the marriage amendment is no
exception to that solemn obligation. Further, Ms. Rosenblum is
dead-wrong in her conclusion that the amendment cannot be
supported by rational legal arguments.
(An accurate copy of the press release, printed from the NOM website and dated
February 20 at 3:35 P.M., is attached as Exhibit 2; see Ex. 2, pp. 2-3.)
4. A copy of a Reuters article reflecting both the Attorney General’s statement and
Mr. Brown’s reaction was published on February 20, 2014. (An accurate copy of the article on
the New York Times website is attached to this Declaration as Exhibit 3; see Ex. 3.)
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
EXECUTED on May 2 , 2014.
s/ Sheila H. PotterSHEILA H. POTTERDeputy Chief Trial Counsel
Case 6:13-cv-01834-MC Document 104 Filed 05/02/14 Page 3 of 8 Page ID#: 982
Skip to contentSkip to navigation
Oregon DOJ Home | Media | Current Releases | 2014 Media Release
STATEMENT OF OREGON ATTORNEY GENERAL ELLEN ROSENBLUM ONTHE SUBJECT OF PENDING LITIGATION CHALLENGING SAME-SEXMARRIAGE BAN
February 20, 2014
Good morning. As many Oregonians are aware, four couples have brought suit against the state, asking a
federal court to find that Oregon’s ban on marriage by couples of the same sex violates the right of equality
enshrined in the United States Constitution. I am named as a defendant in the lawsuits, along with the
Governor, and it falls on my office to appear on behalf of the state before the court and answer the couples’
claims.
Usually — though not always — my office defends the state in litigation. As Attorney General, I have
sworn an oath to uphold our state’s constitution. The lawyers in my office have sworn the same oath. The
oath we took also requires us to uphold the Constitution of the United States – which is the supreme law of
our land. Of course, we all take these oaths very seriously.
So it is after much careful study and consideration that I stand before you today to announce that the
Oregon Department of Justice will not defend the prohibition in our state's constitution against marriages
between people of the same sex. A document called an “answer” filed with the court earlier this morning
informed Judge McShane of our decision. Copies are available for you.
Because our office also represents the people of Oregon, a brief explanation is in order.
The Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution gives people the right to be treated equally by their
government, unless there is a good reason for unequal treatment. That is, any time the government
establishes different sets of rules or laws for different sets of people, there must at least be what the law
calls a “rational basis” for those differences.
The law in this area is developing and it is now clear that there is no rational basis for Oregon to refuse to
honor the commitments made by same-sex couples in the same way it honors the commitments of opposite
-sex couples. Marriage is the way that loving couples become family to each other and to their extended
families, and there is no good reason to exclude same-sex couples from marriage in Oregon, or from
having their marriages recognized here.
Because we cannot identify a valid reason for the state to prevent the couples who have filed these lawsuits
from marrying in Oregon, we find ourselves unable to stand before federal Judge McShane to defend the
state’s prohibition against marriages between two men or two women.
We will be explaining our legal reasoning to Judge McShane as this case proceeds. Those of you who are
interested will be more than welcome to review our pleadings as they are filed. Legal papers that are due
by April will fully address our analysis and that of the other parties in the two cases that are now
consolidated.
Thank you.
Plaintiffs’ Complaint in Geiger et. al v. Kitzhaber et al.•
State of Oregon’s Answer in Geiger et. al v. Kitzhaber et al. | Exhibit A•
Plaintiffs’ Complaint in Rummell et. al v. Kitzhaber et al.•
State of Oregon’s Answer in Rummell et al. v. Kitzhaber et al.•
Contact:
Kristina Edmunson, Department of Justice, Kristina.Edmunson@doj.state.or.us, 503-378-6002
EXHIBIT 1, Page 1 of 1
Case 6:13-cv-01834-MC Document 104 Filed 05/02/14 Page 4 of 8 Page ID#: 983
(3 Stat
emen
t fr
om th
e N
atio
nal O
rgan
izat
ion
fo.
.. P
age
1 o
f 21
Co
nta
ct
Us
.co
m/3
8946
0 z)
0E c
I
= .c « P
rev
ious
Entr
y
http
://w
ww
.nom
b log
.com
/389
47/
.13 In
O
a) C.) E
..0 o o 0 70 E 0 c
I
Z = c 0
°) 0
j
1
0 1 0 E 0 cl 0 70 E 0
1 -:-: = .c 0 o
O A
O
o 4 O
2 CO 0
2 o
O . . Z E
o I M
arr
iage
Regard
ing O
regon A
tto
rne
y G
en
era
l 's D
eci
sion to A
band
on D
efe
nse
of
Ma
rria
ge A
me
ndm
ent
vi
DO
NA
TE
! (H
TT
PS
://W
WW
.NA
TIO
NF
OR
MA
RR
IAG
E.O
RG
/DO
NA
TE
/)
://w
ww
.nat
ionf
orm
arri
a
FO
R 'N
EA
R
I )14
.C..\ N
I 7.
.), 1
1('N
N A
T 1
NYA
L
EXHIBIT 2, Page 1 of 3
Case 6:13-cv-01834-MC Document 104 Filed 05/02/14 Page 5 of 8 Page ID#: 984
rn N
Sta
tem
ent
fro
m t
he
Nat
ion
a
FOR
IMM
ED
IAT
E R
ELE
AS
E: F
ebr
uary
20,
201
4
1-1
Stat
emen
t fr
om th
e N
atio
nal O
rgan
izat
ion
fo.
.. P
age
2 o
f 21
Con
tact
: Eliz
abet
h R
ay o
r M
atill
e T
hebo
lt (7
03-6
83-5
004)
"Att
orn
ey G
ener
al E
llen
Ro
sen
blu
m is
sh
amef
ully
ab
and
on
ing
her
co
nst
itu
tio
na
l dut
y to
def
end
th
e
mar
riag
e am
end
men
t o
verw
hel
min
gly
enac
ted
by
the
peo
ple
of O
rego
n. S
he
swo
re a
n o
ath
of
off
ice
that
sh
e w
ou
ld e
nfo
rce
all
the
law
s, n
ot
just
th
ose
sh
e p
erso
nal
ly a
gre
es w
ith
." —
Bri
an B
row
n, N
OM
Was
hin
gto
n, D
.C. —
The
fol
low
ing
may
be
attr
ibut
ed to
Bri
an B
row
n, p
resi
dent
of
the N
atio
nal
Org
aniz
atio
n fo
r M
arria
ge (
NO
M):
"Atto
rney
Gen
eral
Elle
n R
osen
blum
is s
ham
efu
lly a
band
onin
g h
er
cons
titut
iona
l
dut
y to
def
end
the m
arri
age
am
endm
ent o
verw
helm
ingl
y en
acted
by the
peo
ple
of O
rego
n. S
he s
wor
e an
oath
of o
ffice
tha
t she w
ould
enf
orce
all
the
law
s, n
ot
just
thos
e s
he p
erso
nally
ag
rees
with
. Th
e p
eopl
e a
re e
ntitl
ed to
a v
igor
ous
defe
nse
of t
he la
ws
they
ena
ct, a
nd
the
mar
riage
am
endm
ent is
no
exc
eptio
n
http
://w
ww
.nom
b log
.com
/389
47/
EXHIBIT 2, Page 2 of 3
Case 6:13-cv-01834-MC Document 104 Filed 05/02/14 Page 6 of 8 Page ID#: 985
V 6
co 1- a)
.2 a)
E
crco
ub
licre
lati
on
s.co
m
Stat
emen
t fr
om th
e N
atio
nal O
rgan
izat
ion
fo.
.. P
age
3 o
f 21
to t
hat
so
lem
n o
blig
atio
n. F
urt
her,
Ms.
Ro
senb
lum
is
dea
d-w
rong
in
her
conc
lusi
on th
at t
he
amen
dm
ent
can
not
be
sup
po
rted
by
ratio
nal lega
l arg
um
ents
. Ju
st la
st J
un
e, th
e U
.S.
Su
pre
me
Co
urt
rul
ed t
hat
reg
ulat
ing
mar
riag
e is
th
e p
urvi
ew o
f th
e st
ates
, no
t th
e fe
der
al g
over
nm
ent.
a) 0) as .c 'is E co _c as D a) as
70 Tu > c_ 0 C O _ co '5 a) 0 a) 0 2 a) "2 O
= O
C.) a) E 2 a = co
Cii. D co = 0 E _ c co C = a)
"E' a) c.) 2 iii O 2 am
end
men
t to
be
stay
ed,
str
ong
ly s
ign
alin
g th
at t
he
Co
urt
bel
ieve
s th
ere
is a
goo
d lik
elih
ood
th
at t
he
stat
e
will
win
its
ap
pea
l aga
inst
th
e ru
ling
issu
ed by
an
act
ivist fe
der
al ju
dge.
Mar
riag
e is
ou
r on
ly i
nstit
utio
n th
at
exis
ts t
o b
ring
men
an
d w
om
en to
get
her
to b
enef
it th
e co
up
le a
nd
to p
rovi
de
an id
eal e
nvi
ronm
ent f
or a
ny
child
ren
pro
du
ced
by t
he
ir u
nio
n. I
t ca
n a
nd
mu
st b
e d
efen
ded
as
a u
niq
ue,
ess
entia
l and
pro
foun
dly
goo
d
= . C O 4=, = N C
a
To
sch
edu
le a
n in
terv
iew
with
Bria
n B
row
n, P
res
iden
t of
th
e N
atio
nal Org
aniz
atio
n fo
r M
arri
age,
ple
ase
cont
act
blic
rela
tion
s.co
m)
, or
Mat
ille
Th
ebo
lt,
Eliz
ab
eth
Ray
, era
t 7
03-6
83- 5
004
lati
on
s.co
m
Pai
d fo
r by
The
Na
tional
Org
aniz
atio
n fo
r M
arri
age,
Bri
an B
row
n, p
resi
den
t. 2
02
9 K
Str
eet N
W,
Su
ite 3
00
Was
hing
ton,
DC
200
06, n
ot
auth
oriz
ed b
y an
y c
andi
date
or
can
dida
te's
com
mitt
ee. N
ew §
681
4.40
5(1)
(0 &
(h).
1-1
e
Thi
s en
try
wa
s w
ritt
en b
y N
OM
Sta
ff, p
oste
d o
n a
t 3
:35
pm
, file
d u
nd
er O
reg
on
Pre
ss
Re
leases
C 0 016 o Inw 4.1 oral°
0 0 4- .1.1
O 0 0 i., E E o o t.) Li
O 0 .0 .0 E E o o c c
3 3 3 3
.b." .c
Sam
e S
ex M
arr
iage
ress
-re
leas
es
•Ia .1.1 .0
O
http
://w
ww
.nom
b log
.com
/389
47/
EXHIBIT 2, Page 3 of 3
Case 6:13-cv-01834-MC Document 104 Filed 05/02/14 Page 7 of 8 Page ID#: 986
GUGLP MBATHA-RAW
• 4-
U.S. | NATIONAL BRIEFING |NORTHW EST
Oregon:Attorney GeneralW on’tDefend Ban on Gay Marriage
By REUTERS FEB.20,2014
Oregonwill not defend a banongaymarriage inthe state,which wassued byfour same-sex
coupleswhosaythe banviolatesthe United StatesConstitution,the state attorneygeneral,Ellen
Rosenblum,said Thursday. Oregonbecomesthe third state inthe past month,after Nevada and
Virginia,tocease defending such bans. “It isnowclear that there isnorational basisfor Oregonto
refuse tohonor the commitmentsmade bysame-sexcouplesinthe same wayit honorsthe
commitmentsofopposite sexcouples,”Ms. Rosenblum,a Democrat,said. The decisionwill not
immediatelylegalize same-sexmarriage inOregon,where votersapproved a constitutional banin
2004. BrianBrown,the president ofthe National Organizationfor Marriage,said Ms. Rosenblum
“isshamefullyabandoning her constitutional dutytodefend the marriage amendment
overwhelminglyenacted bythe people ofOregon.”
A ve rs ion ofth is brie fappe ars in printon Fe bruary 21, 2014, on page A15 ofth e N e w York e dition w ith th e h e adline :Ore gon:Attorne y Ge ne ralW on’tDe fe nd M arriage Ban .
Next in U.S.How a GulfSettlement That BPOnce Hailed Became ItsTarget
© 2014 Th e N e w York Tim e s Com pany
h ttp://nyti.m s /1l3zce e
EXHIBIT 3, Page 1 of 1
Case 6:13-cv-01834-MC Document 104 Filed 05/02/14 Page 8 of 8 Page ID#: 987
Recommended