View
2
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1
October 2014ICF 00323.08
3.4 Biological Resources ForthepurposeofthisEIR,biologicalresourcescomprisevegetation,wildlife,naturalcommunities,andwetlandsandotherwaters.Potentialbiologicalresourceimpactsassociatedwiththeprogramandthetwoindividualprojectsareanalyzed.PotentialimpactsaredescribedquantitativelyandqualitativelyinSection3.4.2,EnvironmentalImpacts.Thissectionalsoidentifiesspecificanddetailedmeasurestoavoid,minimize,orcompensateforpotentiallysignificantimpactsonbiologicalresources,wherenecessary.
3.4.1 Existing Conditions
Regulatory Setting
Federal
Endangered Species Act
PursuanttothefederalEndangeredSpeciesAct(ESA),USFWSandtheNationalMarineFisheriesService(NMFS)haveauthorityoverprojectsthatmayresultintakeofaspecieslistedasthreatenedorendangeredundertheact.TakeisdefinedundertheESA,inpart,askilling,harming,orharassing.Underfederalregulations,takeisfurtherdefinedtoincludehabitatmodificationordegradationthatresults,orisreasonablyexpectedtoresult,indeathorinjurytowildlifebysignificantlyimpairingessentialbehavioralpatterns,includingbreeding,feeding,orsheltering.Ifalikelihoodexiststhataprojectwouldresultintakeofafederallylistedspecies,eitheranincidentaltakepermit,underSection10(a)oftheESA,orafederalinteragencyconsultation,underSection7oftheESA,isrequired.Severalfederallylistedspecies—vernalpoolfairyshrimp(Branchinectalynchi),longhornfairyshrimp(Branchinectalongiantenna),vernalpooltadpoleshrimp(Lepiduruspackardi),Californiatigersalamander(Ambystomacaliforniense),Californiared‐leggedfrog(Ranadraytonii),Alamedawhipsnake(Masticophislateraliseuryxanthus),andSanJoaquinkitfox(Vulpesmacrotismutica)—havethepotentialtobeaffectedbyactivitiesassociatedwiththeGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsaswellassubsequentrepoweringprojects.Accordingly,suchprojectswouldrequireconsultationwithUSFWSasdescribedabove.
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
TheFishandWildlifeCoordinationAct,asamendedin1964,wasenactedtoprotectfishandwildlifewhenfederalactionsresultinthecontrolormodificationofanaturalstreamorbodyofwater.Thestatuterequiresfederalagenciestotakeintoconsiderationtheeffectthatwater‐relatedprojectswouldhaveonfishandwildliferesources.ConsultationandcoordinationwithUSFWSandtheCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife(CDFW)arerequiredtoaddresswaystopreventlossofanddamagetofishandwildliferesources,andtofurtherdevelopandimprovetheseresources.
Migratory Bird Treaty Act
TheMigratoryBirdTreatyAct(MBTA)domesticallyimplementsaseriesofinternationaltreatiesthatprovideformigratorybirdprotection.TheMBTAauthorizestheSecretaryoftheInteriortoregulatethetakingofmigratorybirds.Theactfurtherprovidesthatitisunlawful,exceptas
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐2
October 2014ICF 00323.08
permittedbyregulations,“topursue,take,orkillanymigratorybird,oranypart,nestoreggofanysuchbird…”(16USC703).Thisprohibitionincludesbothdirectandindirectacts,althoughharassmentandhabitatmodificationarenotincludedunlesstheyresultindirectlossofbirds,nests,oreggs.ThecurrentlistofspeciesprotectedbytheMBTAcanbefoundintheNovember1,2013FederalRegister(78FR65844–65864).Thislistcomprisesseveralhundredspecies,includingessentiallyallnativebirds.Permitsfortakeofnongamemigratorybirdscanbeissuedonlyforspecificactivities,suchasscientificcollecting,rehabilitation,propagation,education,taxidermy,andprotectionofhumanhealthandsafetyandofpersonalproperty.TakeofnongamemigratorybirdscannotbeauthorizedthroughtheMBTAfortheprogramorPattersonPassandGoldenHillsprojects.USFWSpublishesalistofbirdsofconservationconcern(BCC)toidentifymigratorynongamebirdsthatarelikelytobecomecandidatesforlistingunderESAwithoutadditionalconservationactions.TheBCClistisintendedtostimulatecoordinatedandcollaborativeconservationeffortsamongfederal,state,tribal,andprivateparties.
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
TheBaldandGoldenEagleProtectionAct(BGEPA)(16USC668)prohibitstakeanddisturbanceofindividualsandnests.Takepermitsforbirdsorbodypartsarelimitedtoreligious,scientific,orfalconrypursuits.However,theBGEPAwasamendedin1978toallowminingdeveloperstoapplytoUSFWSforpermitstoremoveinactivegoldeneagle(Aquilachrysaetos)nestsinthecourseof“resourcedevelopmentorrecovery”operations.Withthe2007removalofbaldeaglefromtheESAlistofthreatenedandendangeredspecies,USFWSissuednewregulationstoauthorizethelimitedtakeofbaldeagles(Haliaeetusleucocephalus)andgoldeneaglesundertheBGEPA,wherethetaketobeauthorizedisassociatedwithotherwiselawfulactivities.AfinalEaglePermitRulewaspublishedonSeptember11,2009(74FR46836–46879;50CFR22.26).
Apermitauthorizeslimited,non‐purposefultakeofbaldeaglesandgoldeneagles,andcanbeappliedforbyindividuals,companies,governmentagencies(includingtribalgovernments),andotherorganizationstoallowdisturbanceoforotherwisetakeeaglesinthecourseofconductinglawfulactivities,suchasoperatingutilitiesandairports.UnderBGEPA,takeisdefinedas“pursue,shoot,shootat,poison,wound,kill,capture,trap,collect,destroy,molestordisturb.”Disturbisdefinedintheregulationsas“toagitateorbotherabaldorgoldeneagletoadegreethatcauses,orislikelytocause,basedonthebestscientificinformationavailable:(1)injurytoaneagle;(2)adecreaseinitsproductivity,bysubstantiallyinterferingwithnormalbreeding,feeding,orshelteringbehavior;or(3)nestabandonment,bysubstantiallyinterferingwithnormalbreeding,feeding,orshelteringbehavior.”Mostpermitsissuedunderthenewregulationsauthorizedisturbance.Inlimitedcases,apermitmayauthorizethephysicaltakeofeagles,butonlyifeveryprecautionisfirsttakentoavoidphysicaltake.
USFWSissuedtheEagleConservationPlanGuidance(ECPGuidance)intendedtoassistpartiestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateadverseeffectsonbaldandgoldeneagles(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2013a).TheEagleGuidancecallsforscientificallyrigoroussurveys,monitoring,assessment,andresearchdesignsproportionatetotherisktoeagles.TheEagleGuidancedescribesaprocessbywhichwindenergydeveloperscancollectandanalyzeinformationthatcouldleadtoaprogrammaticpermittoauthorizeunintentionaltakeofeaglesatwindenergyfacilities.USFWSrecommendsthateagleconservationplansbedevelopedinfivestages.Eachstagebuildsonthepriorstage,suchthattogethertheprocessisaprogressive,increasinglyintensivelookatlikelyeffectsoneaglesofthedevelopmentandoperationofaparticularsiteandconfiguration.AdditionalrefinementstotheEagleGuidanceareexpectedatsomepointinthefuture.Todate,one
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐3
October 2014ICF 00323.08
programmaticeagletakepermithasbeenissuedbyUSFWSonJune31,2014(http://www.fws.gov/cno/conservation/migratorybirds.html).
Clean Water Act
WetlandsandotherwatersoftheUnitedStatesareprotectedunderSection404oftheCleanWaterAct(CWA).AnyactivitythatinvolvesanydischargeofdredgedorfillmaterialintowatersoftheUnitedStates,includingwetlands,issubjecttoregulationbytheU.S.ArmyCorpsofEngineers(USACE).WatersoftheUnitedStatesisdefinedtoencompassnavigablewatersoftheUnitedStates;interstatewaters;allotherwaterswheretheiruse,degradation,ordestructioncouldaffectinterstateorforeigncommerce;tributariesofanyofthesewaters;andwetlandsthatmeetanyofthesecriteriaorareadjacenttoanyofthesewatersortheirtributaries.WetlandsaredefinedunderSection404asthoseareasthatareinundatedorsaturatedbysurfacewaterorgroundwateratafrequencyanddurationsufficienttosupport,andthatundernormalcircumstancesdosupport,aprevalenceofvegetationtypicallyadaptedforlifeinsaturatedsoilconditions.Jurisdictionalwetlandsmustmeetthreewetlanddelineationcriteria.
Theysupporthydrophyticvegetation(i.e.,plantsthatgrowinsaturatedsoil).
Theyhavehydricsoiltypes(i.e.,soilsthatarewetormoistenoughtodevelopanaerobicconditions).
Theyhavewetlandhydrology(i.e.,conditionsofflooding,inundation,orsaturationthatsupportwetlandcommunities).
Executive Order 11990: Protection of Wetlands
ExecutiveOrder11990(May24,1977)establishedtheprotectionofwetlandsandripariansystemsastheofficialpolicyofthefederalgovernment.Theexecutiveorderrequiresallfederalagenciestoconsiderwetlandprotectionasanimportantpartoftheirpolicies;takeactiontominimizethedestruction,loss,ordegradationofwetlands;andpreserveandenhancethenaturalandbeneficialvaluesofwetlands.
Federal Noxious Weed Act and Code of Federal Regulations (Title 7, Part 360)
TheselawsandregulationsareprimarilyconcernedwiththeintroductionoffederallydesignatednoxiousweedplantsorseedsacrosstheUnitedStates’internationalborders.TheFederalNoxiousWeedAct(7USC2801–2813)alsoregulatestheinterstatemovementofdesignatednoxiousweedsundertheU.S.DepartmentofAgriculture’spermitsystem.
Executive Order 11312: Invasive Species
ExecutiveOrder11312(February3,1999)directsallfederalagenciestopreventandcontroltheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativespeciesinacost‐effectiveandenvironmentallysoundmannertominimizetheireffectsoneconomic,ecological,andhumanhealth.Theexecutiveorderwasintendedtobuilduponexistinglaws,suchasNEPA,theNonindigenousAquaticNuisancePreventionandControlAct,theLaceyAct,thePlantPestAct,theFederalNoxiousWeedAct,andESA.TheexecutiveorderestablishedanationalInvasiveSpeciesCouncilcomposedoffederalagenciesanddepartments,aswellasasupportingInvasiveSpeciesAdvisoryCommitteecomposedofstate,local,andprivateentities.Thecouncilandadvisorycommitteeoverseeandfacilitateimplementationoftheexecutiveorder,includingpreparationoftheNationalInvasiveSpecies
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐4
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ManagementPlan.FederalactivitiesaddressinginvasiveaquaticspeciesarenowcoordinatedthroughthiscouncilandthroughtheNationalAquaticNuisanceSpeciesTaskForce.
State Plans, Policies, and Regulations
California Environmental Quality Act
CEQAistheregulatoryframeworkbywhichCaliforniapublicagenciesidentifyandmitigatesignificantenvironmentalimpacts.Aprojectnormallyhasasignificantenvironmentalimpactonbiologicalresourcesifitsubstantiallyaffectsarareorendangeredspeciesorthehabitatofthatspecies,substantiallyinterfereswiththemovementofresidentormigratoryfishorwildlife,orsubstantiallydiminisheshabitatforfish,wildlife,orplants.TheStateCEQAGuidelinesdefinerare,threatened,andendangeredspeciesasthoselistedunderESAortheCaliforniaEndangeredSpeciesAct(CESA)oranyotherspeciesthatmeetthecriteriaoftheresourceagenciesorlocalagencies(e.g.,speciesofspecialconcern,asdesignatedbyCDFW).TheguidelinesstatethattheleadagencypreparinganEIRmustconsultwithandreceivewrittenfindingsfromCDFWconcerningprojectimpactsonspecieslistedasendangeredorthreatened.TheeffectsofaproposedprojectontheseresourcesareimportantindeterminingwhethertheprojecthassignificantenvironmentalimpactsunderCEQA.
California Endangered Species Act
CESA(CaliforniaFishandGameCodeSections2050–2116)statesthatallnativespeciesoffishes,amphibians,reptiles,birds,mammals,invertebrates,andplantsandtheirhabitatsthatarethreatenedwithextinctionandthoseexperiencingasignificantdeclinethat,ifnothalted,wouldleadtoathreatenedorendangereddesignationwillbeprotectedorpreserved.
UnderSection2081oftheCaliforniaFishandGameCode,anincidentaltakepermitfromCDFWisrequiredforprojectsthatcouldresultinthetakeofaspeciesthatisstate‐listedasthreatenedorendangered.UnderCESA,takeisdefinedasanactivitythatwoulddirectlyorindirectlykillanindividualofaspecies.Thedefinitiondoesnotincludeharmorharass,asdoesthedefinitionoftakeunderESA.Consequently,thethresholdfortakeunderCESAishigherthanthatunderESA.Forexample,habitatmodificationisnotnecessarilyconsideredtakeunderCESA.
Fully Protected Species
Sections3511,3513,4700,and5050oftheCaliforniaFishandGameCodepertaintofullyprotectedwildlifespecies(birdsinSections3511and3513,mammalsinSection4700,andreptilesandamphibiansinSection5050)andstrictlyprohibitthetakeofthesespecies.CDFWcannotissueatakepermitforfullyprotectedspecies,exceptundernarrowconditionsforscientificresearchortheprotectionoflivestock,orifaNaturalCommunityConservationPlan(NCCP)hasbeenadopted.
California Native Plant Protection Act
TheCNPPAof1977gavetheCaliforniaFishandGameCommissiontheauthoritytolistplantspeciesasrareorendangeredandauthorizedthemtoadoptregulationsprohibitingimportationofrareandendangeredplantsintoCalifornia,takeofrareandendangeredplants,andsaleofrareandendangeredplants.TheCNPPAprohibitstake,possession,transportation,exportation,importation,orsaleofrareandthreatenedplants,exceptasaresultofagriculturalpractices,firecontrolmeasures,timberoperations,mining,oractionsofpublicagenciesorprivateutilities.Private
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐5
October 2014ICF 00323.08
landownersarealsoexemptfromtheprohibitionagainstremovingrareandendangeredplants,althoughtheymustprovide10‐daynoticetoCDFWbeforeremovingtheplants.TheCNPPPAhasmostlybeensupersededbyCESA.
California Rare Plant Rankings
CDFWmaintainslistsofplantsofspecialconcerninCalifornia,inadditiontothoselistedasthreatenedorendangered.ThesespecieshavenoformalprotectionunderCESA,butthevaluesandimportanceoftheselistsarewidelyrecognized.PlantswithaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1A,1B,and2meetthedefinitionsofSection1901oftheCaliforniaFishandGameCodeandmayqualifyforstatelisting.Accordingly,forpurposesofthisanalysis,suchplantspeciesareconsideredrareplantspursuanttoSection15380ofCEQA.
Protection of Birds and Raptors
Section3503oftheCaliforniaFishandGameCodeprohibitsthekillingofbirdsand/orthedestructionofbirdnests.Section3503.5prohibitsthekillingofraptorspeciesand/orthedestructionofraptornests.Typicalviolationsincludedestructionofactivebirdandraptornestsasaresultoftreeremoval,andfailureofnestingattempts(lossofeggsand/oryoung)asaresultofdisturbanceofnestingpairscausedbynearbyhumanactivity.Section3513prohibitsanytakeorpossessionofbirdsdesignatedbytheMBTAasmigratorynongamebirdsexceptasallowedbyfederalrulesandregulationspursuanttotheMBTA.CDFWcannotissuepermitsunderMBTAforthetakeofbirdsbytheprogramortheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojects.
Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code
Sections1600–1603oftheCaliforniaFishandGameCodestatethatitisunlawfulforanypersonoragencytosubstantiallydivertorobstructthenaturalfloworsubstantiallychangethebed,channel,orbankofanyriver,stream,orlakeinCaliforniathatsupportswildliferesources,ortouseanymaterialfromthestreambeds,withoutfirstnotifyingCDFW.ALakeandStreambedAlterationAgreement(LSAA)mustbeobtainedifeffectsareexpectedtooccur.Theregulatorydefinitionofastreamisabodyofwaterthatflowsatleastperiodicallyorintermittentlythroughabedorchannelhavingbanksandthatsupportswildlife,fish,orotheraquaticlife.Thisdefinitionincludeswatercourseshavingasurfaceorsubsurfaceflowthatsupportsorhassupportedriparianvegetation.CDFW’sjurisdictionwithinalteredorartificialwaterwaysisbasedonthevalueofthosewaterwaystofishandwildlife.
Porter‐Cologne Water Quality Control Act
UnderthePorter‐CologneAct,watersofthestatefallunderjurisdictionofthenineRegionalWaterQualityControlBoards(RWQCBs).Underthisact,eachRWQCBmustprepareandperiodicallyupdatewaterqualitycontrolbasinplans.Eachbasinplansetsforthwaterqualitystandardsforsurfacewaterandgroundwater,aswellasactionstocontrolnonpointandpointsourcesofpollution.ProjectsthataffectwetlandsorwatersmustmeetthewastedischargerequirementsoftheRWQCB.PursuanttoCWASections401,anapplicantforaSection404permittoconductanyactivitythatmayresultindischargeintonavigablewatersmustprovideacertificationfromtheRWQCBthatsuchdischargewillcomplywithstatewaterqualitystandards.AspartofthewetlandspermittingprocessunderSection404,aprojectapplicantwouldberequiredtoobtainawaterqualitycertificationfromtheapplicableRWQCB.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐6
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Section13050ofthePorter‐CologneAct(CaliforniaWaterCode,Division7)authorizestheStateWaterResourcesControlBoardandtherelevantRegionalWaterQualityControlBoard(inthecaseoftheAPWRA,theCentralValleyandSanFranciscoBayWaterBoards)toregulatebiologicalpollutants.TheCaliforniaWaterCodegenerallyregulatesmoresubstancescontainedindischarges,anddefinesdischargestoreceivingwatersmorebroadlythantheCWAdoes.
California Wetlands Conservation Policy
ThegoalsoftheCaliforniaWetlandsConservationPolicy,adoptedin1993(ExecutiveOrderW‐59‐93),are“toensurenooverallnetloss,andachievealong‐termnetgaininthequantity,quality,andpermanenceofwetlandsacreageandvaluesinCalifornia,inamannerthatfosterscreativity,stewardship,andrespectforprivateproperty”;toreduceproceduralcomplexityintheadministrationofstateandfederalwetlandsconservationprograms;andtomakerestoration,landownerincentiveprogramsandcooperativeplanningeffortstheprimaryfocusofwetlandsconservation.
Regional and Local Plans, Policies, and Regulations
East County Area Plan
LanduseplanningintheeasternportionofAlamedaCountyisgovernedbytheECAP,whichwasadoptedbytheCountyinMay1994.InNovember2000,theAlamedaCountyelectorateapprovedMeasureD,theSaveAgricultureandOpenSpaceLandsInitiative,whichamendedportionsoftheCounty’sGeneralPlan,includingtheECAP(AlamedaCounty2000).TheOpenSpaceElementoftheECAPaddressessensitivelandsandregionallysignificantopenspace,includingbiologicalresources.WindfarmsareaddressedintheSpecialLandUsessectionoftheECAP.
East Alameda County Conservation Strategy
TheEastAlamedaCountyConservationStrategy(EACCS)isacollaborativeeffortamongseverallocal,state,andfederalagenciesintendedtoprovideaneffectivevoluntaryframeworktoprotect,enhance,andrestorenaturalresourcesineasternAlamedaCounty,whileimprovingandstreamliningtheenvironmentalpermittingprocessforimpactsresultingfrominfrastructureanddevelopmentprojects(ICFInternational2010).TheEACCSisintendedtofocusonimpactsonbiologicalresourcessuchasendangeredandotherspecial‐statusspeciesandsensitivehabitattypes(e.g.,wetlands,ripariancorridors,rareuplandcommunities).TheEACCSwillultimatelyenablelocalprojectstocomplywithstateandfederalregulatoryrequirementswithinaframeworkofcomprehensiveconservationgoalsandobjectives,andwillfacilitateimplementationusingconsistentandstandardizedmitigationrequirements.ByimplementingtheEACCS,localagencieswillbeabletomoreeasilyaddressthelegalrequirementsrelevanttothesespecies.
TheEACCSstudyareaencompasses271,485acres,orapproximately52%ofAlamedaCountyintheupperAlamedaCreekwatershedofthecentralcountyarea,andtheeast‐facingslopesoftheAltamontHills.ThecitiesofDublin,Livermore,andPleasantonarewithintheEACCSstudyarea.ThewesternboundaryoftheEACCSstudyareafollowsthewesternedgeoftheAlamedaCreekwatershed,andthenorthern,southern,andeasternboundariesfollowtheAlamedaCountylinewithitsadjacentcounties.TheEACCSstudyareaincludestheprogramarea.
AfinaldraftoftheEACCSwascompletedinOctober2010andreleasedtothepublicinMarch2011.OnMay31,2012,USFWSissuedtheProgrammaticBiologicalOpinionfortheEastAlamedaCounty
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐7
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ConservationStrategy(referenceNo.08ESMFOO‐2012‐F‐0092‐1)(ProgrammaticBO).Installation,operation,andmaintenanceofwindenergyprojectsareidentifiedascoveredinfrastructureprojectsundertheProgrammaticBO.However,avianandbateffectsassociatedwiththesetypesofprojectsarenotcoveredundertheProgrammaticBO.IndividualprojectsmaybeappendedtotheProgrammaticBOiftheyareconsistentwiththeEACCS,occurwithintheEACCSstudyarea,andareacoveredactivity.TheProgrammaticBOdoesnotprovideincidentaltakeauthorization;therefore,individualprojectsappendedtotheProgrammaticBOwillbegrantedindividualtakecoverageaspartoftheproject’sSection7consultationprocess.BecausetheEACCSisdesignedtobeanadaptivemanagementprocess,theProgrammaticBOmaybeamendedinthefuture,oranewBOmaybewritteniftherearesubstantivechangestotheEACCS.
ForprojectswhereUSACEisnotthefederalleadagencyforSection7consultationorwhereSection10consultationisrequired,consistencywiththeProgrammaticBOwillenableotherfederalagenciesandnonfederalapplicantstostreamlinetheirindividualESAconsultationsbyutilizingpreapprovedmitigationstandardsandfocusingmitigationinconservationpriorityareas.
EACCSdevelopmentincludedinputandreviewbyCDFWtoaddressimpactsonstate‐listedspecies.ConsistencywiththeEACCSalsoaidsinstreamliningCESApermitcomplianceforprojectimpactsonstate‐listedspecies.
AlthoughparticipationintheEACCSbyapplicantsisvoluntary,AlamedaCountyparticipatesinthestrategyandconsidersittobethebestavailableinformationwhenconsideringtheimpactsofproposedprojectsonthefullrangeofprotectedwildlife,plants,andhabitats.
2007 Settlement Agreement
In2007,Audubon,CARE,andthreewindenergycompanies(AES,NextEra,andEnXco)enteredintoaSettlementAgreementtoresolvelitigationregardingtheCounty’s2005issuanceofCUPapprovalsofcontinuedwindenergyoperations.The2007SettlementAgreement,includingExhibitG‐1(modifiedfromthe2005CUPs),requiresparticipantstodevelopanNCCPorasimilaragreementto“addressthelong‐termoperationofwindturbinesattheAPWRAandtheconservationofimpactedspeciesofconcernandtheirnaturalcommunities.”Inparticular,the2007SettlementAgreementcommittedtheparticipatingwindcompaniestoachievea50%reductioninavianfatalitiesfromanestimatedbaselineofannualfatalitiesoffourfocalspecies(goldeneagle,burrowingowl[Athenecunicularia],Americankestrel[Falcosparverius],andred‐tailedhawk[Buteojamaicensis])throughtheimplementationoftheAvianWildlifeProtectionProgramandSchedule(AWPPS)asestablishedin2005andmodifiedin2007.The2007SettlementAgreementandtheamendedAWPPSrequiredtheimplementationofvariousmanagementactions,includingseasonalshutdownofturbinesandremovalofturbinesdeemedtobe“high‐risk”turbines,untilthe50%reductiongoalwasachieved.TheAWPPSrequiredtheestablishmentoftheAlamedaCountyAvianFatalityMonitoringTeam(AFMT).TheAFMTwaschargedwithdevelopingandimplementing—underthesupervisionanddirectionoftheScientificReviewCommittee—aprogramtomonitorturbine‐relatedavianfatalityratesanduseoftheAPWRAbybirdsofmanagementconcern.Underthe2007SettlementAgreement,theemphasisoftheAFMTwasdirectedtothefourfocalspecies,anditsworkwascentraltoevaluationofprogresstowardachievingthe50%reductiongoalestablishedbytheSettlementAgreement.
AsanalternativetotheNCCPcalledforintheSettlementAgreement,theCountypreparedthisPEIRwithmitigationmeasurestoprovideaframeworkforreviewandapprovalofwindprojectsintheAPWRAandtopromoteconservationmeasurestobenefitavianspecies.AsdescribedinSection
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐8
October 2014ICF 00323.08
1.2.4,ConditionalUsePermits,theCountydevelopedadraftAvianProtectionProgram(APP)toprovideaframeworkandprocessforwindenergyprojectstoaddressapplicablestatutes(e.g.,MBTAandBGEPA)throughtherepoweringprocess.TheAPPprovidedabroadevaluationofexistingenvironmentalconditions,birduse,andavianfatalitiesintheprogramarea.Itfocusedonavianmortalityassociatedwithrepoweringprojects—specificallyconstruction,operation,monitoring,andmitigation.ThekeyprovisionsoftheAPPwereincorporatedintotheprogram‐levelmitigationmeasuresofthisPEIR.Projectproponentswillbeexpectedtodevelopproject‐specificAPPs,incorporatingmitigation,monitoring,andadaptivemanagementstrategiesassetforthinthisPEIR.
2010 Settlement Agreement
OnDecember3,2010,Audubon,CARE,NextEra,thePeopleoftheStateofCalifornia,andtheAttorneyGeneralenteredintoasettlementagreement.Therepoweringscheduleinthe2010SettlementAgreemententailedNextErarepoweringold‐generationturbinesunderitscurrentownershipintheAPWRAassoonascommerciallyreasonable,inthreeorfewerphases,witheachphasecomprisingupto80MWandeachphaseundergoingCEQAreviewbymeansofanEIR.Phase1wastheVascoWindsprojectinContraCostaCounty;Phases2and3wouldbeprojectsintheAlamedaCountyportionoftheAPWRA.Eachphaseofrepoweredturbinesissubjectto3yearsofpostconstructionfatalitymonitoring,usingthefocalspeciesidentifiedinthe2007SettlementAgreementaswellasbatsasbenchmarksforevaluatingeffectivenessofrepowering.Theagreementisstructuredsuchthateachphaseofrepoweringisintendedtoinformthesitingofturbinesinsubsequentphases.Mitigationfeestocompensateforongoingbirdandbatfatalitieswerealsoestablishedintheagreement.NextEraistheonlywindoperatorintheAPWRAthatwasapartytothe2010SettlementAgreement.WhiletheCountyisnotapartytothe2010SettlementAgreementandthereforehasnoresponsibilitiesundertheagreement,therepowering,conservation,andmonitoringmeasuresintheagreementwerereviewedandincorporatedintothemitigationmeasuresinthePEIRasdeemedappropriatebytheCounty.
Environmental Setting
Theprogramareaischaracterizedbyrollinghillswithelevationsrangingfrom256to1,542feetabovemeansealevel.Windfarmoperations,livestockgrazingand,toalesserextent,drylandfarming(graincrops)aretheprimarylandusesintheprogramarea.
Theprogramareacontains19landcovertypesthatweremappedduringpreparationoftheEACCS.LandcovertypesintheprogramareaarelistedinTable3.4‐1andshowninFigure3.4‐1.LandcovertypesintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasarelistedinTables3.4‐2and3.4‐3andshowninFigures3.4‐2and3.4‐3,respectively.MappingresourcesusedfortheEACCSincludeddigitalorthophotographyfrom2005and2007,previouslymappedwetlandsfrom2001,USFWSwetlandsinventorydatalayer,andfieldverificationsurveysconductedbyICFin2010.DrainagedatafromU.S.GeologicalSurveyNationalHydrographyDatasetfrom2012wereaddedtothesedatasetstocreateFigures3.4‐1through3.4‐3.Theplantcommunitiesandassociatedwildlifeineachlandcovertypeintheprogramareaaredescribedbelow.Existingturbinesmaynotbepresentinalllandcovertypesdescribedbelow;however,alllandcovertypesaredescribedbecauseitisassumedthatrepoweringactivitiescouldhaveimpactsonanylandcovertypewithintheprogramarea.LandcovertypesthatarepresentwithintheGoldenHillsorPattersonPassprojectareasaresonotedinthelandcoverdescriptionsbelow.Mostrecently,EDFREconductedhabitatassessmentsforspecial‐statusspeciesandadelineationofwatersoftheUnitedStates,includingwetlands,thatUSACEhas
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐9
October 2014ICF 00323.08
verified.AreportdetailingtheresultsoftheEDFREbiologicalsurveyandwetlanddelineationisincludedinAppendixCofthisPEIR.
Table 3.4‐1. Approximate Acreages of Land Cover Types in the Program Area
LandCover AmountinProgramArea(acres)
Annualgrassland 39,375.79
Alkalimeadow/scald 555.06
Rockoutcrop 42.05
Northernmixedchaparral/chamisechaparral 28.65
Northerncoastalscrub/Diablansagescrub 74.51
Mixedevergreenforest/oakwoodland 582.18
Blueoakwoodland 163.61
Foothillpine–oakwoodland 21.11
Mixedwillowriparianscrub 39.27
Mixedriparianforestandwoodland 9.93
Alkaliwetland 483.17
Seasonalwetland 82.76
Perennialfreshwatermarsh 5.01
Canal/Aqueduct 158.21
Ponds 53.74
Reservoirs 176.58
Drainages Notcalculated
Cropland 4.55
DevelopedandDisturbed 1,502.58
Total 43,358.76
Table 3.4‐2. Approximate Acreages of Land Cover Types in the Golden Hills Project Area
LandCover AmountinProjectArea(acres)
Annualgrassland 4,287.08
Alkalimeadow/scald 145.69
Mixedwillowriparianscrub 6.54
Alkaliwetland 37.13
Seasonalwetland 0.09
Ponds 2.89
Drainages Notcalculated
DevelopedandDisturbed 0.71
Total 4,480.13
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐10
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.4‐3. Approximate Acreages of Land Cover Types in the Patterson Pass Project Area
LandCover AmountinProjectArea(acres)
Annualgrassland 939.81
Mixedwillowriparianscrub 4.00
Seasonalwetland 1.41
Perennialfreshwatermarsh 4.99
Ponds 0.84
Drainages 0.81
Total 951.86
Grassland
Grasslandconsistsofherbaceousvegetationdominatedbygrasses,althoughfloweringforbsareoftenaconspicuouscomponentoftheplantcover.MostofthegrasslandintheprogramareaischaracterizedasCaliforniaAnnualGrassland.Twootherhabitats,alkalimeadowandrockoutcrops,areinterspersedassmallpatcheswithinthegrasslandmatrixandare,accordingly,includedinanddiscussedascomponentsofthegrasslandhabitat.
Grassland Plant Communities
California Annual Grassland
Californiaannualgrasslandisfoundthroughouttheprogramarea,occupyingapproximately39,375.79acres.Californiaannualgrasslandisanherbaceousplantcommunitydominatedbynonnativeannualgrasses(Holland1986:36–37;SawyerandKeeler‐Wolf1995:40–41).ThedominantspeciesaremostlynonnativegrassesfromtheMediterraneanbasin,suchassoftchess(Bromushordeaceus),redbrome(Bromusmadritensissubsp.rubens),Mediterraneanbarley(Hordeummarinumvar.gussoneanum),wildoats(Avenaspp.),ripgutbrome(Bromusdiandrus),Italianryegrass(Festucaperennis[Loliummultiflorum]),andrat‐tailfescue(Festucamyuros).Inthespring,manyoftheannualgrasslandsareinterspersedwithdiversenativewildflowerstypicaloftheinnerCoastRanges.Commonlyfoundspeciesofwildflowersinthesegrasslandsincludelupine(Lupinusspp.),fiddleneck(Amsinckiaspp.),popcornflower(Plagiobothrysspp.),bigheronbill(Erodiumbotrys),redstemmedfilaree(E.cicutarium),Californiapoppy(Eschscholziacalifornica),owl’s‐clover(CastillejaandTriphysariaspp.),andclarkia(Clarkiaspp.).Special‐statusplantspeciesthatmaybefoundinthisplantcommunityincludelarge‐floweredfiddleneck(Amsinckiagrandiflora),bigtarplant(Blepharizoniaplumosa),round‐leavedfilaree(Californiamacrophylla),Lemmon’sjewelflower(Caulanthuslemmonii),diamond‐petaledCaliforniapoppy(Eschscholziarhombipetala),shiningnavarretia(Navarretianigelliformisssp.radians),andcaper‐fruitedtropidocarpum(Tropidocarpumcapparideum).
AnnualgrasslandisalsothedominantlandcovertypeintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas,withannualgrasslandconstituting96%(4,287.08acres)and99%(934.06acres)oftheprojectareas,respectively.
Alkali Meadow
Alkalimeadowoccursinscatteredpatchestotalingapproximately555.06acresinthecentralandnorthernportionsoftheprogramarea.Alkalimeadowisaperennialgrasslandcommunitythat
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐11
October 2014ICF 00323.08
occursonalkalisoils(Holland1986:42–43;SawyerandKeeler‐Wolf1995:78–79).Dominantspeciesinalkalimeadowincludesaltgrass(Distichlisspicata),wildbarley(Hordeumspp.),andalkaliryegrass(Elymustriticoides).Theassociatedherbcoverconsistsofhalophytes,includingsaltbush(Atriplexspp.),alkaliheath(Frankeniasalina),alkaliweed(Cressatruxillensis),alkalimallow(Malvellaleprosa),andcommonspikeweed(Centromadiapungens).AlkalimeadowisconsideredasignificantnaturalcommunitybyCDFWbecauseofitsrarityandthepressingthreatstotheremnantcommunitiesfromovergrazingandlanduseconversion(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013a).Special‐statusplantspeciesthatmaybefoundinthisplantcommunityincludeSanJoaquinspearscaleandrecurvedlarkspur.
Alkalimeadowcomprisesapproximately3%(145.69acres)oftheGoldenHillsprojectarea.ThereisnoalkalimeadowinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Rock Outcrop
Rockoutcropsarefrequentlyencounteredinsomegrasslands,andapproximately42.05acresarepresentintheprogramarea.Theseoutcropsareexposuresofbedrockthattypicallylacksoilandhavesparsevegetation.Withintheprogramarea,severaltypesofrockoutcropsarepresentandarederivedfromsedimentaryandmetamorphicsources.ThegreatestconcentrationofrockoutcropsoccursnearBrushyPeakRegionalPreserve,althoughotherrockoutcropsareinthevicinityofTeslaRoad.Onespecial‐statusplantspecies,raylessragwort(Packeraindecora),maybefoundinthisplantcommunity.
Common Wildlife Associations
Characteristicwildlifespeciesingrasslandsincludereptilessuchaswesternfencelizard(Sceloporusoccidentalis),commongartersnake(Thamnophissirtalis),andwesternrattlesnake(Crotalisviridis);mammalssuchasblack‐tailedjackrabbit(Lepuscalifornicus),Californiagroundsquirrel(Spermophilusbeecheyi),westernharvestmouse(Reithrodontomysmegalotis),Californiavole(Microtuscalifornicus),andcoyote(Canislatrans);andbirdssuchasred‐tailedhawk,Americankestrel,barnowl(Tytoalba),andwesternmeadowlark(Sturnellaneglecta).Severalcommonbatspecies,suchascanyonbat(Parastrellushesperus),canroostinrockyoutcropsandforageovergrassland.
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesassociatedwithgrasslandsincludegoldeneagle,Swainson’shawk,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike(Laniusludovicianus),SanJoaquinkitfox,andAmericanbadger(Taxideataxus).Californiared‐leggedfrogandCaliforniatigersalamanderusegrasslandsasmovementandaestivation(summerhibernation)habitat.Alamedawhipsnakeisknowntousegrasslandsadjacenttoshrublandsandrockoutcropsforbreedingandrefugia.Pallidbat(Antrozouspallidus)isknowntoroostincrevicesinrockoutcropsandforageoversurroundinggrassland.Annualgrasslandalsoprovidesimportantforaginghabitatfornorthernharrier(Circuscyaneus)andwhite‐tailedkite(Elanusleucurus).
Scrub/Chaparral
Chaparralcommunitiesaredominatedbydenselypackedandnearlyimpenetrabledrought‐adaptedevergreenwoodyshrubs,6.5–13feettall,thatpossesssmall,thick,leathery,sclerophyllousleaves(Hanes1977:419;Holland1986:20–21).Coastalscrubcommunities,incomparison,aregenerallycharacterizedbylowshrubs,usually1.5–6.5feettallwithsoftnon‐scerophyllousleaves,andinterspersedwithgrassyopenings(Holland1986).Twoscrub/chaparralplantcommunitiesare
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐12
October 2014ICF 00323.08
presentintheprogramarea:northernmixedchaparral/chamisechaparralandnortherncoastalscrub/Diablansagescrub.
Scrub/Chaparral Plant Communities
Northern Mixed Chaparral/Chamise Chaparral
Northernmixedchaparral/chamisechaparraloccupiesapproximately28.65acresinthesouthernendoftheprogramarea.Northernmixedchaparralmayinterminglewithnortherncoastalscrub/Diablansagescrub,foothillpine‐oakwoodlands,andmixedevergreenforest/oakwoodland.
Dominantshrubsinthiscommunityintheprogramareaincludechamise(Adenostomafasciculatum),manzanita(Arctostaphylossp.),scruboak(Quercusberberidifolia),andceanothus(Ceanothussp.).Otherimportantspeciesaretoyon(Heteromelesarbutifolia),coffeeberry(Rhamnuscalifornica),madrone(Arbutusmenziesii),Californiabay(Umbellulariacalifornica),birchleafmountain‐mahogany(Cercocarpusbetuloides),poison‐oak(Toxicodendrondiversilobum),bushmonkeyflower(Mimulusaurantiacus),andCaliforniayerbasanta(Eriodictyoncalifornicum).Somechaparralstandsmaybealmostentirelycomposedofdensestandsofchamise.Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthisplantcommunityintheprogramarea.
Northern Coastal Scrub/Diablan Sage Scrub
Northerncoastalscrub/Diablansagescruboccupiesapproximately74.51acresinthesouthernportionoftheprogramarea.Northerncoastalscrub/Diablansagescrubintheprogramareaiscomposedprimarilyofevergreenshrubswithanherbaceousunderstoryinopenings.Northerncoastalscrub/DiablansagescrubcommunitiesaredominatedbyCaliforniasagebrush(Artemisiacalifornica)andblacksage(Salviamellifera),withassociatedspeciesincludingcoyotebrush(Baccharispilularis),toyon,big‐berrymanzanita(Manzanitaglauca),Californiabuckwheat(Eriogonumfasciculatum),poison‐oak,Californiayerbasanta,andbushmonkeyflower(Holland1986:8–10).Rockoutcropsarealsopresentinthisplantcommunity.Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthisplantcommunityintheprogramarea.
Common Wildlife Associations
Commonwildlifespeciesthatusechaparralandscrubhabitatsintheprogramareaincludegophersnake(Pituophismelanoleucus),westernrattlesnake,westernfencelizard,brushrabbit(Sylvilagusbachmani),Californiapocketmouse(Perognathuscalifornicus),spottedskunk(Spilogalegracilis),muledeer,coyote,andbobcat(Lynxrufus).Commonbirdspeciesincludemourningdove(Zenaidamacroura),Californiaquail(Callipeplacalifornica),Anna’shummingbird(Calypteanna),westernscrub‐jay(Aphelocomacalifornica),Bewick’swren(Thryomanesbewickii),Californiatowhee(Pipilocrissalis),lessergoldfinch(Carduelispsaltria),foxsparrow(Passerellailiaca),white‐crownedsparrow(Zonotrichialeucophrys),anddark‐eyedjunco(Juncohyemalis).
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesknowntooccurinchaparralandnortherncoastalscrubcommunitiesincludeAlamedawhipsnakeandloggerheadshrike.ChaparralandnortherncoastalscrubaretheprimaryhabitatsforAlamedawhipsnake,whichbreeds,forages,andthermoregulatesinthishabitat.Contiguousstandsarenecessarytosupportviablepopulationsofthisspeciesthroughoutitsrange.Loggerheadshrikesareknowntonestandforageinscrubhabitatswithlowdensitiesofshrubcanopycover.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐13
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Woodland
Theprogramareacontainsthreewoodlandplantcommunities:mixedevergreenforest/oakwoodland,blueoakwoodland,andfoothillpine‐oakwoodland.TheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasdonotsupportanywoodlandplantcommunities.
Woodland Plant Communities
Mixed Evergreen Forest/Oak Woodland
Mixedevergreenforest/oakwoodlandisthemostcommonwoodlandcommunityintheprogramarea,occupyingapproximately582.18acresatthesouthendoftheprogramarea.Mixedevergreenforest/oakwoodlandischaracterizedbyadiverseoverstoryoftendominatedbycoastliveoak(Quercusagrifolia)(Holland1986:86;SawyerandKeeler‐Wolf1995:241–242).Associatedco‐dominantspeciescanincludeblueoak(Q.douglasii),valleyoak(Q.lobata),Californiabay,madrone,Californiabuckeye(Aesculuscalifornica),andblackoak(Q.kelloggii).Whereshrubby,theunderstoryconsistsofpatchesoftoyon,poison‐oak,andscruboak.Wheremoreopen,theunderstorytypicallyconsistsofannualgrassesandshade‐tolerantperennials,suchasyerbabuena(Clinopodiumdouglasii)andcommonsnowberry(Symphoricarposalbus).Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthisplantcommunityintheprogramarea.
Blue Oak Woodland
Thereareapproximately163.61acresofblueoakwoodlandscatteredthroughoutthesouthernhalfoftheprogramarea.Thislandcovertypicallyoccursinthelow‐tomid‐elevationhillsinslightlydriermicroclimates.Blueoakwoodlandisdominatedbyblueoak,ahighlydrought‐tolerantspeciesadaptedtogrowthonthinsoilsinthedryfoothills.Californiabuckeyeandfoothillpine(Pinussabiniana)areassociatedtreespeciesinthiscommunity.Theunderstoryofblueoakwoodlandvariesfromshrubbytoopen.Understoryspeciestypicallyincludeannualgrasses,hollyleafcherry(Prunusilicifolia),poison‐oak,andcoffeeberry.SomeblueoakwoodlandalliancesareconsideredbyCDFWtobesensitivecommunities(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2010).Onespecial‐statusplantspecies,shiningnavarretia,occursinthisplantcommunityintheprogramarea.
Foothill Pine‐Oak Woodland
Foothillpine‐oakwoodlandoccupiesapproximately21.11acresinthesouthernportionoftheprogramarea.Thecanopyisdominatedbyfoothillpineandblueoak(Holland1986:77).Oaksbecomemoreprevalentatlowerelevations,oftenformingaclosedcanopylayerbelowtheemergentpines,andtheunderstorylacksanappreciableshrublayer.Associatedcanopyspeciesincludeinteriorliveoak,coastliveoak,andCaliforniabuckeye.Associatedshrubspeciesincludeceanothusspecies,bigberrymanzanita,Californiacoffeeberry,poison‐oak,silverlupine(Lupinusalbifrons),blueelderberry,Californiayerbasanta,rockgooseberry(Ribesquercetorum),andCaliforniaredbud(Cercisoccidentalis).Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthiscommunityintheprogramarea.
Common Wildlife Associations
Characteristicwildlifespeciesthatcanbefoundinwoodlandhabitatsincludegophersnake, westernfencelizard,red‐tailedhawk,Americankestrel,barnowl,greathornedowl(Bubovirginianus),acornwoodpecker(Melanerpesformicivorus),Nuttall’swoodpecker(Picoidesnuttallii),northernflicker(Colaptesauratus),white‐breastednuthatch(Sittacarolinensis),Californiaquail,spottedtowhee(Pipilomaculatus),Bewick’swren,bushtit(Psaltriparusminimus),bigbrownbat
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐14
October 2014ICF 00323.08
(Eptesicusfuscus),Californiamyotis(Myotiscalifornicus),deermouse(Peromyscusmaniculatus),westerngraysquirrel(Sciurusgriseus),muledeer,andcoyote.
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesthatmaybefoundinoakwoodlandsincludeCaliforniatigersalamander,Alamedawhipsnake,goldeneagle,loggerheadshrike,hoarybat,pallidbat,westernredbat(Lasiurusblossevillii),SanJoaquinkitfox,andAmericanbadger.Californiatigersalamandersuseburrowsinthegrassyunderstoryofopenwoodlandsforaestivationandrefugia.Alamedawhipsnakemayuseoakwoodlandformovementbetweenchaparralandcoastalscrubhabitats.Goldeneaglesandloggerheadshrikesusevalleyoakwoodlandandotherwoodlandsforroosting,nesting,andforaging.Hoarybat,pallidbat,andwesternredbatroostinwoodlandsandforageabovethecanopy,inforestopenings,andalongforestedges.SanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgermayuseopenvalleyoakwoodlandfordenning,foraging,andmovement.
Riparian
Withintheprogramarea,theriparianlandcovertypeoccursalongcreeksandaroundopenwaterbodies.Riparianvegetationintheprogramareaconsistoftwocommunitytypes:mixedwillowriparianscrubandmixedriparianforestandwoodland.Atthestatelevel,riparianplantcommunitiesareconsideredsensitivebecauseofthesubstantialreductionintheiramountandrange,andfortheirvalueashabitatforalargenumberofplantandwildlifespecies.
Riparian Plant Communities
Mixed Willow Riparian Scrub
Mixedwillowriparianscruboccupiesapproximately39.27acresinandalongthemarginsoftheactivechannelofintermittentandperennialdrainages.Intheprogramarea,thisplantcommunityisfoundalongPattersonRunanddrainagesnorthtoI‐580.
Conditionsinthemixedwillowriparianscrubcommunitycanrangefromopenwell‐developedcanopieswithminimalunderstorytodenseareasdominatedprimarilybyunderstoryspecieswithlittletonocanopy.Yellowwillow(Salixlasiandra),redwillow(S.laevigata),arroyowillow(S.lasiolepis),andnarrowleafwillow(exigua)arethedominantcanopyspeciesinthishabitat.Scrubcommunitiestypicallyconsistofscatteredwillowsandmulefat(Baccharissalicifolia),whichoccurinandalongthemarginsofopensandywashes.Understorydevelopmentinthiscommunitytypeiscontrolledbycanopydensity.Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthisplantcommunityintheprogramarea.
Mixedwillowriparianscrubcomprisesapproximately0.1%(6.54acres)oftheGoldenHillsprojectareaand0.4%(4.00acres)ofthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Mixed Riparian Forest and Woodland
Mixedriparianforestandwoodlandoccupiesapproximately9.93acresinthesouthernportionoftheprogramarea.ItoccursalongsectionsofArroyoSecoalongTeslaRoad,ArroyoVallenearHaysCamp,CorralHollowCreekanditstributaries,andFairchildGulchandDeadmanGulchinElyarCanyon.
Mixedriparianforestandwoodlandcommunitiesaresimilartomixedwillowriparianscrubintermsofhabitatrequirements.Theyarefoundinandalongthemarginsoftheactivechannelonintermittentandperennialdrainages.Generally,nosinglespeciesdominatesthecanopy,and
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐15
October 2014ICF 00323.08
compositionvarieswithelevation,aspect,hydrology,andchanneltype.ThemajorcanopyspeciesincludeCaliforniasycamore,valleyoak,coastliveoak,redwillow,andCaliforniabay.AssociatedtreesandshrubsincludeCaliforniablackwalnut,otherspeciesofwillow,Californiabuckeye,Fremontcottonwood,andbigleafmaple.Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthiscommunityintheprogramarea.
Common Wildlife Associations
WildlifespeciesthatareoftenassociatedwithriparianhabitatsincludeamphibianssuchasSierrantreefrog(Pseudacrissierrae),Californianewt(Tarichatorosa),westernaquaticgartersnake(Thamnophiscouchii),red‐shoulderedhawk(Buteolineatus),Wilson’swarbler(Wilsoniapusilla),spottedtowhee,Bullock’soriole(Icterusbullockii),long‐tailedweasel(Mustelafrenata),grayfox(Urocyoncinereoargenteus),raccoon(Procyonlotor),andyumamyotis(Myotisyumanensis).
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesassociatedwithriparianforestandscrubincludeCaliforniared‐leggedfrog,Swainson’shawk,westernredbat,Townsend’sbig‐earedbat(Corynorhinustownsendii),andhoarybat.Californiared‐leggedfrogsuseriparianhabitattypesforbreeding,foraging,andrefugia.Swainson’shawksnestandroostinriparianforest,andhoaryandwesternredbatsusethishabitatforroostingandforaging.Townsend’sbig‐earedbatsareknowntoforagealongripariancorridorswhenappropriateroosthabitatisnearby.
Wetland
Thewetlandlandcovertypeincludesareassubjecttoseasonalorperennialfloodingorponding,orthatpossesssaturatedsoilconditionsandthatsupportpredominantlyhydrophyticor“water‐loving”herbaceousplantspecies(Cowardinetal.1979).Becausewetlandsareperiodicallywaterlogged,theplantsgrowinginthemmusttoleratelowlevelsofsoiloxygenassociatedwithwaterloggedorhydricsoils.Thepresenceofflood‐tolerantspeciesoftenindicatesthatasiteisawetlandevenifthegroundappearstobedryformostoftheyear,orifhydrologicinfluencesarelessobvious.
Thewetlandlandcovertypeintheprogramareaconsistsofthreecommunities:alkaliwetland,seasonalwetland(includingvernalpools),andperennialfreshwatermarsh.Ingeneral,wetlandsareconsideredasensitivebioticcommunitybecauseoftheirlimiteddistributionandtheirimportancetospecial‐statusplantandwildlifespeciesstatewide.
Wetland Plant Communities
Alkali Wetland
Alkaliwetlandsoccupyapproximately483.17acresintheprogramarea.Alkaliwetlandssupportpondedorsaturatedsoilconditionsandoccurasperennialorseasonallywetfeaturesonalkalisoils.Alkaliwetlandsoccurprimarilyalongstreamchannelswherealkalisoilsarepresent.Intheprogramarea,thisplantcommunityoccursalongAltamontCreek,thesouthsideofI‐580,andinseveraldrainagessouthoftheAlameda/ContraCostaCountylineandwestofBethanyReservoir.TheonlysiteinAlamedaCounty(besidestheSpringtownAlkaliSink)thatsupportslargeareasofalkalisoilsandintactstandsofvalleysinkscrubandalkaligrasslandisanareaofapproximately267acresinthenortheasterncornerofthecounty.ThesiteoccursneartheintersectionofKelsoandBrunsRoadsbetweentheDelta‐MendotaCanalandtheCaliforniaAqueduct.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐16
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Thevegetationofalkaliwetlandsiscomposedofhalophyticplantspeciesadaptedtobothwetlandconditionsandhighsalinitylevels.Typicalspeciesincludesaltgrass,alkaliheath,andcommonspikeweed.Theassociatedherbcoverconsistsofhalophytes,includingsaltbush,alkaliheath,seepweed,alkaliweed,andsaltmarshsandspurry(Spergulariamarina).Standsofiodinebushmayalsobepresent.Special‐statusplantspeciesthatoccurinthisplantcommunityintheprogramareaincludebrittlescale(Atriplexdepressa),SanJoaquinspearscale(A.joaquinana),lessersaltscale(A.minuscula),andrecurvedlarkspur(Delphiniumrecurvatum).
Alkaliwetlandcomprisesapproximately0.8%(37.13acres)oftheGoldenHillsprojectarea.AlkaliwetlandsarenotpresentinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Seasonal Wetlands
Seasonalwetlandsoccupyapproximately82.76acresscatteredthroughouttheprogramarea,withseverallargeseasonalwetlandcomplexes(i.e.,groupsofmanysmallpoolsorwetlands)occurringalongroadwaysanddrainagebottomsinthevicinityofAltamontPass.Thiscommunityoftenoccursadjacenttoalkaliwetland.
Seasonalwetlandsarefreshwaterwetlandsthatsupportpondedorsaturatedsoilconditionsduringwinterandspringandaredrythroughthesummerandfalluntilfall/winterrainfallbeginstosaturatethesoil.Vernalpoolsareatypeofseasonalwetlandthatpondwateronthesurfaceforextendeddurationsduringwinterandspringanddrycompletelyduringlatespringandsummerduetoanunderlyinghardpan.Thishardpanrestrictsthepercolationofwaterandcreatesa“perched”seasonalwatersource.Theysupportatypicalfloralargelycomposedofnativewetlandplantspecies.VernalpoolsineasternAlamedaCountyoccurindistinctivetopographywithlowdepressionsmixedwithhummocksormounds.Thesedepressionsfillwithrainwaterandrunofffromadjacentareasduringthewinterandmayremaininundatedduringthespringtoearlysummer.VernalpoolsarefoundeastandnorthofLivermoreandnortheastofBethanyReservoir.
Vegetationtypicallyassociatedwithotherseasonalwetlandsconsistsofwetlandgeneralists,suchashyssoploosestrife(Lithiumhyssopifolia),cocklebur(Xanthiumstrumarium),Mediterraneanbarley,andItalianryegrass.Uplandspeciessuchassoftchess,blackmustard(Brassicanigra),redstemmedfilaree,andcommontarweed(Holocarphavirgata)canalsooccur.Commonspeciesinseasonalwetlandswithintheprojectareaincludewatercress(Rorippasp.),waterspeedwell(Veronicaanagallis‐aquatica),andsmartweeds(Polygonumspp.).Noknownoccurrencesofspecial‐statusplantshavebeendocumentedinthiscommunityintheprogramarea.Mostofthespecial‐statusplantsintheprogramareavicinitydonotoccurinseasonalwetlands;however,onespecies—alkalimilk‐vetch(Astragalustenervar.tener)—occursonthemarginsofalkalivernalpools.
Seasonalwetlandcomprisesapproximately0.02%(0.09acre)oftheGoldenHillsprojectareaand0.1%(1.32acres)ofthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Perennial Freshwater Marsh
Perennialfreshwatermarshoccupiesapproximately5.01acresoftheprogramarea.Perennialfreshwatermarshoccursprimarilyinsmallpatchesalongstreamcoursesordrainagesandattheedgesofsomeponds.Intheprogramarea,perennialfreshwatermarshispresentinthenortheastportionoftheprogramareanearBrunsRoad.
Perennialfreshwatermarshisdominatedbyemergentherbaceousplants(reeds,sedges,grasses)witheitherintermittentlyfloodedorperenniallysaturatedsoils(Holland1986:48–49).Inthe
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐17
October 2014ICF 00323.08
programarea,plantspeciesassociatedwithperennialfreshwatermarshincludewillows,saltgrass,Mediterraneanbarley,Italianryegrass,rabbitsfootgrass(Polypogonsp.),nutsedge(Cyperuseragrostis),willowweed(Polygonumlapathifolium),watercress,Balticrush(Juncusbalticus),narrow‐leavedcattail(Typhaangustifolia),ricecutgrass(Leersiaoryzoides),bur‐reed(Sparganiumeurycarpum),alkalibulrush(Bolboschoenusrobustus),stingingnettle(Urticadioicassp.holosericea),willowherb(Epilobiumciliatum),celery‐leavedbuttercup(Ranunculusscleratus),small‐floweredsaltcedar(Tamarixparviflora),andperennialpeppergrass(Lepidiumlatifolium).Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthisplantcommunityintheprogramarea.
NoperennialfreshwatermarshoccursintheGoldenHillsprojectarea.
Perennialfreshwatermarshcomprisesapproximately0.5%(4.99acres)ofthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Common Wildlife Associations
Alkaliandseasonalwetlandsprovideimportanthabitatforavarietyofaquaticinvertebratesandamphibians,whichprovidefoodsourcesforvariousbirdspecies.Perennialfreshwatermarshisanimportanthabitatforawidevarietyofwildlifespecies.Wildlifespeciesthatoccurinorusefreshwatermarshforbreedingorcoverincludewesternpondturtle(Actinemysmarmorata),severalgartersnakespecies,greatblueheron(Ardeaherodias),greategret(Ardeaalba),mallard(Anasplatyrhynchos),killdeer(Charadriusvociferus),greateryellowlegs(Tringamelanoleuca),muledeer,andcoyote.Seasonalwetlandsarecommonlyusedbyavarietyofwildlifeduringthewetseason,includingSierrantreefrog,Californiatoad(Bufoboreas),black‐neckedstilt(Himantopusmexicanus),Americanavocet(Recurvirostraamericana),red‐wingedblackbird(Agelaiusphoeniceu),white‐tailedkite,andnorthernharrier.Numerousspeciesofbatsforageoverfreshwaterwetland,includingMexicanfree‐tailedbat(Tadaridabrasiliensismexicanus).
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesassociatedwithalkaliand/orseasonalwetlandsincludelonghornfairyshrimp,vernalpoolshrimp,vernalpooltadpoleshrimp,curved‐foothygrotusdivingbeetle(Hygrotuscurvipes),Californiatigersalamander,Californiared‐leggedfrog,andhoarybat.Longhornfairyshrimp,vernalpoolfairyshrimp,andvernalpooltadpoleshrimparedependentonephemeralwetlandssuchasvernalpoolsandalkaliwetlands.CaliforniatigersalamandersuseseasonalwetlandsthatholdwateruntilAprilorlaterandperennialfreshwatermarshforbreedingandlarvaldevelopment.Californiared‐leggedfrogsuseseasonalwetlandsandfreshwatermarshforrefugiaandbreeding.Perennialfreshwatermarshispotentialhabitatforwesternpondturtle.Hoarybatsforagenearoroverwetlands.
Aquatic
Theaquaticlandcovertypeconsistsofopenwaterhabitatssuchasreservoirs,rivers,streams,canals,andponds(includingquarryandstockpondsthatdonottypicallysupportemergentvegetation).Aquatichabitatintheprogramareacomprisescanal/aqueducts,ponds,reservoirs,andstreams.
Aquatic Plant Communities
Canal/Aqueduct
Canal/aqueductencompassesapproximately158.21acresoftheprogramarea.PortionsoftheCaliforniaAqueductandtheDeltaMendotaCanal,aswellasotherirrigationcanals,arepresentin
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐18
October 2014ICF 00323.08
theprogramarea.Becausethesefeaturesareintendedtomovewaterbetweenareas,theyareoftenmanagedforminimalvegetationtoenhancetheflowofwaterthroughthechannels.Canalsandaqueductstypicallyconveylargeamountsofwaterandcontaindeepwaterwithswiftflowyear‐round.Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthiscommunityintheprogramarea.
Canal/aqueductisnotpresentintheGoldenHillsorPattersonPassprojectareas.
Ponds
Pondsoccupyapproximately53.74acresoftheprogramareaandweredefinedasperennialorseasonalwaterbodieslessthan20acresinsize.Pondsarescatteredthroughouttheprogramarea.Pondsmayhavevaryingamountsofemergent,submerged,and/orfloatingvegetation,dependingonthelengthofinundationandleveloflivestockgrazing.
Themajorityofthepondsintheprogramareaaresmallstockpondswithlittleornovegetationthatprovidewaterforlivestock.Plantsoftenassociatedwithpondsincludefloatingplantssuchasduckweed(Lemnaspp.)orrootedplantssuchascattails,bulrushes,sedges,rushes,watercress,andwaterprimrose.
Stockpondsareoftensurroundedbypasturewithgrazinglivestock.Immediatelyadjacenttothestockpond,soilmaybeexposedbecauseofthecontinuedpresenceoflivestock.Stockpondsinungrazedareasorthathavebeenprotectedfromgrazingmaybesurroundedbywetlandvegetationincludingwillows,cattails,reeds,bulrushes,sedges,andtules(Scirpuscalifornicus).Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthiscommunityintheprogramarea.
Pondsconstituteapproximately0.06%(2.89acres)oftheGoldenHillsprojectareaand0.1%(0.84acre)ofthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Reservoirs
Thereservoirlandcovertypeencompassesapproximately176.58acresoftheprogramarea.Reservoirsweredefinedasbeinglargerthan20acres.Reservoirsareopenwaterbodiesthatarehighlymanagedforwaterstorage,watersupply,floodprotection,orrecreationaluses.BethanyReservoiristheonlyreservoirintheprogramarea.ThereservoirservesasaforebayfortheSouthBayPumpingPlantandaconveyancefacilityinthisreachoftheCaliforniaAqueduct.
Plantsoftenassociatedwithreservoirsincludethoseplantscommontodeepwatersystems.Algaearethepredominantplantlifefoundintheopenwatersofreservoirs.Dependingonreservoirtemperature,waterlevel,andotherenvironmentalconditions,algalbloomsmayoccur,resultinginthickalgalmatsonthesurfaceofthereservoir.Ifthereservoiredgesareshallow,plantspeciessimilartothosefoundinpondsmaybepresent.Ifthereservoirhassteeperedges,waterdepthandfluctuationsinreservoirheightmaypreventtheestablishmentofvegetation.Uplandandripariantreesthatwerenotremovedduringconstructionofthereservoirorthatwereplantedafterwardmaybepresentalongtheperimeterofthereservoir.Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthiscommunitytypeintheprogramarea.
DrainagesTherearenumerousperennial,intermittent,andephemeraldrainagesintheprogramarea.Becausethesearelinearfeatures,theareaofdrainageintheprogramareawasnotcalculated.MajordrainageswithintheprogramareaincludeBrushyCreek,AltamontCreek,MountainHouseCreek,CorralHollowCreek,andPattersonRun.Largerdrainagesoftenhaveriparianvegetationalongthem(seethediscussionoftheriparianlandcovertypeabove).Theriparianplant
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐19
October 2014ICF 00323.08
compositionandwidthoftheripariancorridorvarydependingonchannelslope,magnitudeandfrequencyofchannelandoverbankflows,andthefrequency/durationoffloodingflowsthatinundatethebroaderfloodplain.Willowsmaybecomeestablishedin‐channelinareasofsedimentdeposition,unlesssuppressedbyintensivegrazing.
Intermittent,ephemeral,andpotentiallyperennialdrainagesarepresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.TheacreageofdrainageswasnotcalculatedfortheprogramareaortheGoldenHillsprojectareabecausenodelineationofwaterswasconductedfortheseareas.
AwetlanddelineationwaspreparedforthePattersonPassproject,and0.85acreofdrainageswasmappedinthePattersonPassprojectareaaspartofthewetlanddelineation.
Common Wildlife Associations
Openwatersupportsavarietyofducksincludingmallard,green‐wingedteal,cinnamonteal(Anascyanoptera),gadwall(A.strepera),Americanwigeon(A.americana),andAmericancoot.Manyspeciesofcommonandspecial‐statusbats,includingyumamyotisandsilver‐hairedbat(Lasionycterisnoctivagans),forageonemergentaquaticinvertebratesandobtainfreshwaterfromopenwaterhabitats.
Whilecanalsandaqueductscanserveasloafinghabitatforsomewaterfowlspecies,theygenerallydonothavemuchhabitatvalue.Becausethesewaterwaysaresowideanddeep,theyalsocreatebarrierstomovementonthelandscapeforterrestrialspecies.However,thesefeaturesmayprovidetheopenexpansesofwaternecessaryforbatspeciesthatdrinkonthewingandlackthemaneuverabilitytoaccesssmallerwatersources,suchaswesternmastiffbat(Eumopsperotis).
Pondsattractmanybirdsthatarenormallyfoundintheadjacentgrasslands;forexample,Californiaquail,mourningdove,andbarnandcliffswallows(HirundorusticaandH.pyrrhonota)allrequiredailywaterandareknowntousepondsaswatersources.Pondsthatcontaineithersubmergedoremergentvegetationareofparticularimportancetonativeamphibiansasbreedinghabitat.Inperennialponds,nonnativebass(Micropterusssp.)andbullfrog(Lithobatescatesbeianus)arecommonandareoftenprevalentwildlifespecies.Raccoonsforagealongtheedgesofpondsforadultandlarvalamphibians,fish,andcrayfish.
Reservoirsprovidefoodforsomeraptors,whichmayalsonestinnearbytrees.Shoreandwadingbirdsincludingkilldeer,black‐neckedstilt,greateryellowlegs,andseveralgullspeciesmaybefoundinandattheedgesofreservoirs.Reservoirsprovidehabitatforsomenativefishsuchashitch,Sacramentoblackfish,Californiaroach,andSacramentosucker,butmorecommonlysupportnonnativefishsuchasbluegill,sunfish,brownbullhead,carp,goldfish,andlargemouthbass.Reservoirscanalsoprovidesuitablerearinghabitatfornonmigratoryrainbowtroutifconditionsarefavorable.
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesthatmaybefoundinoruseponds,streams,themarginsofreservoirs,ortheinletswherestreamsflowintoreservoirsincludeCaliforniatigersalamander,Californiared‐leggedfrog,westernpondturtle,andtricoloredblackbird.Tricoloredblackbirdsrelyonvegetationassociatedwithponds(cattailsandbulrush)fornesting.Westernredbat,hoarybat,Townsend’sbig‐earedbat,andsilver‐hairedbatcouldforageaboveordrinkfromcanalsoraqueducts.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐20
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Cropland
Cropland Plant Communities
Thecroplandlandcovertypeencompassesallareaswherethenativevegetationhasbeenclearedforirrigatedagriculturaluseordrylandfarming.Thiscommunitydoesnotincluderangeland,whichisoftencharacterizedasanagriculturallanduse(mostrangelandintheprogramareaisclassifiedasannualgrassland).Approximately4.55acresofcroplandispresentinthenortheastcorneroftheprogramarea.Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthislandcovertypeintheprogramarea.
Common Wildlife Associations
Somenativewildlife,suchassmallmammals,certainraptors,andmigratorywaterfowl,utilizecroplandseasonallyoryear‐round.Year‐roundactivitytendstobeconcentratedalongthemarginsofactivefarmlandwherevegetationislessdisturbedorwheretreesandshrubstendtooccur(someareplanteddeliberatelyaswindbreaks).Openfieldsthatareirrigatedforforagecropsarealsousedbywildlife.Cultivatedagricultureisbisectedbystreams,ditches,andchannels.Someamphibiansandreptilesutilizetheselinearaquaticfeaturesandtheadjacentuplandhabitat.
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesexpectedtobefoundinoralongtheedgesofcroplandareburrowingowl,white‐tailedkite,loggerheadshrike,Swainson’shawk,andgoldeneagle.SanJoaquinkitfoxesandAmericanbadgersmaymovethroughorforagealongtheedgesofcroplandsifitoccursnearsuitablegrasslandareas.CaliforniatigersalamandersandCaliforniared‐leggedfrogsmaymovethroughcroplandstoreachsuitablebreedingandaestivationhabitat.
Developed and Disturbed
Approximately1,502.58acresofthedevelopedanddisturbedlandcovertypearepresentintheprogramarea.Developedlandcomprisesalltypesofdevelopmentforresidential,commercial,industrial,transportation,landfill,landscaping,andrecreationaluses(e.g.,siteswithstructures,pavedsurfaces,horticulturalplantings,golfcourses,andirrigatedlawns).Developedanddisturbedlandsintheprogramareaincluderuderalland,urban/suburbandevelopment,ruralresidential,landfill,golfcourses/urbanparks,andwindturbinesandassociatedinfrastructure.
Developed and Disturbed Plant Communities
Ruderalareasareperiodicallydisturbedandarecharacterizedbysparsenonnative,typicallyweedyvegetation.Mostruderalareasarevacantparcelssurroundedbydevelopedareas.Wherevegetationispresent,ruderallandcoverisdominatedbyamixtureofnonnativeannualgrassesandweedyspecies,suchasblackmustard(Brassicanigra),thistles(Cirsiumspp.),andwildradish(Raphanussativa),thattendtocolonizequicklyafterdisturbance.
Vegetationfoundinotherdevelopedlandsisusuallyintheformoflawns,landscaping,andplantedstreettrees(e.g.,elm,ash,liquidambar,pine,palm).Theruralresidentiallandsmayalsoincludesmallareasofirrigatedpasture.
Landfillsarehighlydisturbedareaswhileinuse.Afteralandfillisclosedandcapped,itmaybereturnedtonaturalcommunitytypesthroughplantingandmanagement.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐21
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Common Wildlife Associations
Developedanddisturbedareasprovidelimitedhabitatforwildlifebutareoftenknowntosupportcommonurban‐dwellingspeciessuchasnorthernmockingbird(Mimuspolyglottos),rockpigeon(Columbalivia),mourningdove,housesparrow(Passerdomesticus),housefinch(Carpodacusmexicanus),westernscrub‐jay,Botta’spocketgopher(Thomomysbottae),Californiagroundsquirrel,housemouse(Musmusculus),blackrat(Rattusrattus),andcoyote.Semi‐developedareascontaininggrass,trees,orwatersources(smallpondsandditches)maysupportadditionalwildlifespecies.Mexicanfree‐tailedbatisknowntoformlargecoloniesinurbanbuildingsandbridges,andothercommonspecies,suchasbigbrownbat,arefoundinresidentialatticsandornamentaltreesincityparks.Thesespeciesaretypicallygeneralizedopportunisticforagersthatarehighlytolerantofhumanactivity.
Whiledevelopedlandscapesdonotprovidehigh‐qualityhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies,somedevelopedareasmaybeusedforforagingandmovement.SanJoaquinkitfoxes,goldeneagles,andloggerheadshrikesmaymovethroughand/orforageinruderalareas,golfcourses/urbanparks,andornamentalwoodlands.Burrowingowlsmayuseruderalareas,urban/suburban,andgolfcoursesforforagingandbreeding.CaliforniatigersalamandersandCaliforniared‐leggedfrogsmaymigratethroughsomedevelopedareasbetweenhabitatpatches.CaliforniatigersalamandersandCaliforniared‐leggedfrogsmayalsousegolfcoursesifpondsarepresentonornearthegolfcourseandsuitableuplandhabitatisnearby.Somespecial‐statusbatsmayuseartificialstructuresassociatedwithurbanlandscapes—suchasbuildings,bridges,andtunnels—formaternityroosts.Pallidbatsareknowntoroostincrevicesinbridgesorbuildings,andTownsend’sbig‐earedbatshavebeenfoundinopenspacesinabandonedbuildings,tunnelsandotherartificialstructures.
Special‐Status Species
Special‐statusspeciesareplantsandanimalsthatarelegallyprotectedunderESA,CESA,orotherregulations;andspeciesthatareconsideredsufficientlyrarebythescientificcommunitytoqualifyforsuchlisting.Special‐statusspeciesaredefinedasfollows.
SpeciesthatarelistedorproposedforlistingasthreatenedorendangeredunderESA(50CFR17.11[listedanimals];50CFR17.12[listedplants];andvariousnoticesintheFederalRegister.
SpeciesthatarecandidatesforpossiblefuturelistingasthreatenedorendangeredunderESA(77FR69993,November21,2012).
SpeciesthatarelistedorproposedforlistingbytheStateofCaliforniaasthreatenedorendangeredunderCESA(14CCR670.5).
SpeciesthatmeetthedefinitionsofrareorendangeredunderCEQA(StateCEQAGuidelinesSection15380).
PlantslistedasrareundertheCNPPA(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlifeCommission1900etseq.).
PlantswithaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1A,1B,2A,and2B(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013).
AnimalslistedasCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcernonCDFW’sSpecialAnimalsList(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2011).
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐22
October 2014ICF 00323.08
AnimalsthatarefullyprotectedinCalifornia(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlifeCommission3511[birds],4700[mammals],5050[amphibiansandreptiles],and5515[fish]).
BatsidentifiedasmediumorhighpriorityontheWesternBatWorkingGroupregionalpriorityspeciesmatrix(WesternBatWorkingGroup2007).
APWRAfocalspecies.
SpeciesoflocalconservationconcernintheAPWRA.
Special‐Status Plants
Thirty‐sixspecialstatusplantspeciesoccurinorwithin5milesoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b)(Table3.4‐4).Twenty‐fourofthespeciesarenotknowntooccurintheprogramarea(i.e.,theyoccurwithinthe5‐mileradiusbutnotwithintheprogramareaboundary)andarenotdiscussedfurther.Thefollowingdiscussionfocusesonthe12speciesthatoccurintheprogramarea.
Large‐Flowered Fiddleneck
Large‐floweredfiddleneckisstate‐andfederallylistedasendangered,withaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.1.Historically,itwasknownfromtheMountDiablofoothillsinContraCosta,Alameda,andSanJoaquinCounties,butitiscurrentlyknownonlyfromtwonaturaloccurrencesnearCorralHollowRoadinSanJoaquinCounty(KelleyandGanders2012:454;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Large‐floweredfiddleneckgrowsingrasslands,generallyonnorth‐facingslopes.Asinglepopulationwasknownfromtheprogramarea,locatedonLawrenceLivermoreLaboratory’sSite300testarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Thisoccurrenceappearstohavebeenextirpatedbyerosionandhasnotbeenobservedsince1997(Carlsenetal.2012).Californiaannualgrasslandsintheprogramareaarepotentialhabitatforthisspecies.
Brittlescale
BrittlescalehasnofederalorstatelistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.2.ItispresentalongthewesternsideoftheGreatValleyfromGlenntoMercedCountiesandinthesmallvalleysoftheinnerCoastRanges,includingtheLivermoreValley(Zacharias2012:633–634;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Atthelandscapelevel,brittlescaleoccursinthebroadfloodbasinsofthevalleyfloorandonalluvialfansassociatedwiththemajordrainagesdrainingfromtheinnerCoastRangefoothills.Itgrowsiniodinebushscrubandalkaligrasslandsonthemarginsofvernalpools,swales,slickspots,andscalds.Itisgenerallyfoundatlowelevationsbuthasbeencollectedupto1,055feetabovesealevel.BrittlescalehasbeenreportedintheprogramareafromscaldsinthevicinityofAltamontPassRoad(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Potentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinalkaliwetlandsintheprogramarea;alkaliwetlandsoccurintheGoldenHillsprojectareabutnotinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
San Joaquin Spearscale
SanJoaquinspearscalehasnofederalorstatelistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.2.ItoccursalongthewesternsideoftheGreatValleyfromGlenntoFresnoCountiesandinthesmallvalleysoftheinnerCoastRanges,includingtheLivermoreValley(Zacharias2012:634;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).ItoccursinthebroadfloodbasinsofthevalleyfloorandonalluvialfansassociatedwiththemajordrainagesdrainingfromtheinnerCoastRanges
Table 3.4‐4. Special‐Status Plant Species Known or with Potential to Occur in the Altamont Pass Wind Repowering Program Area Page 1 of 4
CommonNameScientificName
StatusaFederal/State/CRPR Distribution Habitat OccurrenceinProgramArea
Sharsmith’sonionAlliumsharsmithii
–/–/1B.3 MountHamiltonRange Rockyserpentineslopes,inchaparralorcypresswoodland;bloomsMarch–May
NearestoccurrencesonCedarMountain;programareaoutsideknownrangeofspecies
Large‐floweredfiddleneckAmsinckiagrandiflora
E/E/1B.1 HistoricallyknownfromMountDiablofoothillsinContraCosta,Alameda,andSanJoaquincounties;currentlyknownfromtwonaturaloccurrences
Valleygrasslandslopesbelow1,200feet;bloomsApril–May
Occursinprogramarea
Alkalimilk‐vetchAstragalustenervar.tener
–/–/1B.2 SouthernSacramentoValley,northernSanJoaquinValley,eastSanFranciscoBayArea
Grassyflatsandvernalpoolmargins,onalkalisoils;bloomsMarch–June
NearestoccurrencesinLivermoreValley,ByronHotSprings(bothoccurrencesextirpated)
HeartscaleAtriplexcordulata
–/–/1B.2 CentralValleyfromColusaCountytoKernCounty
Alkaligrassland,alkalimeadow,alkaliscrub;bloomsMay–October
Occurrencerecordsnearprogramareabasedonmisidentifications
BrittlescaleAtriplexdepressa
–/–/1B.2 WesternandeasternCentralValleyandadjacentfoothillsonwestsideofCentralValley
Alkaligrassland,alkalimeadow,andalkaliscrub
Occursinprogramarea
SanJoaquinsaltbushAtriplexjoaquiniana
–/–/1B.2 EasternSanFranciscoBayArea,westedgeofCentralValleyfromGlennCountytoFresnoCounty
Alkalimeadow,alkaligrassland,saltbushscrub;bloomsApril–September
Occursinprogramarea
LessersaltscaleAtriplexminuscula
–/–/1B.1 SanJoaquinValleyfromMercedCountytoKernCounty;ButteCounty
Alkalisinkandsandyalkalinesoilsingrasslands,between65–325feet;bloomsMay–October
Occursinprogramarea
BigscalebalsamrootBalsamorhizamacrolepis
–/–/1B.2 ScatteredoccurrencesintheCoastRangesandSierraNevadafoothills
Fieldsandrockyhillsides,below2,000feet;grassland,foothillwoodland;bloomsMarch–June
NearestoccurrenceinLivermore(occurrenceextirpated)
BigtarplantBlepharizoniaplumosa
–/–/1B.1 InteriorCoastRangefoothillsfromContraCostaCountytoStanislausCounty
Annualgrassland,ondryhillsandplains,between50–1,500feet;bloomsJuly–October
Occursinprogramarea
Round‐leavedfilareeCaliforniamacrophylla
–/–/1B.1 ScatteredoccurrencesintheGreatValley,southernNorthCoastRanges,SanFranciscoBayArea,SouthCoastRanges,ChannelIslands,TransverseRanges,andPeninsularRanges
Grasslands,onfriableclaysoils;blooms;March–May
Occursinprogramarea
Table 3.4‐4. Continued Page 2 of 4
CommonNameScientificName
StatusaFederal/State/CRPR Distribution Habitat OccurrenceinProgramArea
MountDiablofairylanternCalochortuspulchellus
–/–/1B.2 EndemictoContraCostaCounty Cismontanewoodland;chaparral;bloomsApril–June
NearestoccurrenceinLosVaqueroswatershed
ChaparralharebellCampanulaexigua
–/–/1B.2 SanFranciscoBayregion;northerninnersouthCoastRanges;Alameda,ContraCosta,SanBenito,SantaClara,andStanislausCounties
Rockyareasinchaparral,usuallyonserpentinite;bloomsMay–June
NearestoccurrencesonCedarMountain;programareaoutsideknownrangeofspecies
Lemmon'sjewelflowerCaulanthuslemmonii
–/–/1B.2 SoutheastSanFranciscoBayArea,souththroughtheSouthCoastRangesandadjacentSanJoaquinValley
Dryexposedslopesingrasslandsandpinyon‐juniperwoodland,between260–4,000feet;bloomsMarch–May
Occursinprogramarea
Congdon'sspikeweedCentromadiaparryisubsp.Congdonii
–/–/1B.2 EastSanFranciscoBayArea,SalinasValley,LosOsosValley
Annualgrassland,onlowerslopes,flats,andswales,sometimesonalkalineorsalinesoils,below560feet;bloomsJune–November
Occurrencerecordsinprogramareabasedonmisidentifications
Hispidbird’s‐beakChloropyronmollesubsp.Hispidum
–/–/1B.1 ScatteredlocationsinSanJoaquinValleyfromSolanoCountytoKernCounty
Meadow,grassland,playa;onalkalinesoils,below500feet;bloomsJune–September
NearestoccurrenceinLivermore
Palmatebird’s‐beakChloropyronpalmatum
E/E/1B.1 LivermoreValleyandscatteredlocationsintheCentralValleyfromColusatoFresnoCounty
Alkalinegrasslands,chenopodscrub;bloomsMay–October
NearestoccurrenceinLivermore
MountHamiltonthistleCirsiumfontinalevar.campylon
–/–/1B.2 EastSanFranciscoBayArea Serpentineseepsandstreams;bloomsApril–October
NearestoccurrencesonCedarMountain;programareaoutsideknownrangeofspecies
LivermoretarplantDeinandrabacigalupii
–/–/1B.2 EndemictoAlamedaCounty(LivermoreValley)
Alkaligrassland;bloomsJune–October
NearestoccurrenceinLivermore
HospitalCanyonlarkspurDelphiniumcalifornicumvar.interius
–/–/1B.2 EasternSanFranciscoBayArea,northernSouthCoastRange;CarmelValley
Moistravinesandslopesinwoodlands;bloomsMarch–May
Nearestoccurrencessouthofprogramarea
RecurvedlarkspurDelphiniumrecurvatum
–/–/1B.2 SanJoaquinValleyandinteriorvalleysoftheSouthCoastRanges,fromContraCostaCountytoKernCounty
Subalkalinesoilsinannualgrassland,saltbushscrub;bloomsMarch–May
Occursinprogramarea
Table 3.4‐4. Continued Page 3 of 4
CommonNameScientificName
StatusaFederal/State/CRPR Distribution Habitat OccurrenceinProgramArea
Diamond‐petaledCaliforniapoppyEschscholziarhombipetala
–/–/1B.1 InteriorfoothillsofSouthCoastRangesfromContraCostaCountytoStanislausCounty;CarrizoPlaininSanLuisObispoCounty
Grassland,chenopodscrub;onclaysoils,wheregrasscoverissparseenoughtoallowgrowthoflowannuals;bloomsMarch–May
Occursinprogramarea
TalusfritillaryFritillariafalcata
–/–/1B.2 SanFranciscoBayArea,InteriorSouthCoastRanges
Chaparral,oakwoodland,coniferousforest,onserpentinetalus;bloomsMarch–May
NearestoccurrencesonCedarMountain;programareaoutsideknownrangeofspecies
DiablohelianthellaHelianthellacastanea
–/–/1B.2 SanFranciscoBayArea Atchaparral/oakwoodlandecotone,ofteninpartialshade,onrockysoils,between80–3,800feet;bloomsApril–June
NearestoccurrencesonCedarMountain
Brewer’sdwarfflaxHesperolinonbreweri
–/–/1B.2 KnownonlyfromContraCosta,Napa,andSolanocounties
Serpentineslopesinchaparralandgrasslands;bloomsMay–July
NearestoccurrenceinLosVaqueroswatershed
TehamaCountywesternflaxHesperolinontehamense
–/–/1B.3 NorthernandcentralinteriorNorthCoastRanges:Tehama,GlennCounties
Chaparral,foothillwoodland,onserpentine;100–1,000m;bloomsMay–July
NearestoccurrencesonCedarMountain;nohabitatinprogramarea
CaliforniahibiscusHibiscuslasiocarpus
–/–/1B.2 ScatteredsmalllocationsincentralCalifornia,fromButtetoSanJoaquinCounty
Freshwatermarshalongriversandsloughs;bloomsAugust–September
NearestoccurrencesnearCliftonCourtForebay
LomaPrietahoitaHoitastrobilina
–/–/1B.1 SanFranciscoBayArea Oakwoodland,riparianwoodland,chaparral,onserpentinite;bloomsMay–October
NearestoccurrenceonCedarMountain
MountHamiltoncoreopsisLeptosynehamiltonii
–/–/1B.2 DiabloRange Steepshaletalusslopes;bloomsMarch–May
NearestoccurrenceonCedarMountain
Mason’slilaeopsisLilaeopsismasonii
–/R/1B.1 Sacramento/SanJoaquinRiverdelta Freshwaterorbrackishmarsh,intidalzone;bloomsApril–October
NearestoccurrencesnearCliftonCourtForebay
DeltamudwortLimosellaaustralis
–/–/2.1 ContraCosta,Sacramento,SanJoaquin,andSolanoCounties
Marshesandswamps;bloomsMay–August
NearestoccurrencesnearCliftonCourtForebay
ShowymadiaMadiaradiata
–/–/1B.1 ScatteredpopulationsintheinteriorfoothillsoftheSouthCoastRanges
Oakwoodland,grassland;slopesbelow3,000feet;bloomsMarch–May
NearestoccurrencesnearCorralHollow
Table 3.4‐4. Continued Page 4 of 4
CommonNameScientificName
StatusaFederal/State/CRPR Distribution Habitat OccurrenceinProgramArea
ShiningnavarretiaNavarretianigelliformissubsp.radians
–/–/1B.2 InteriorfoothillsofSouthCoastRangesfromMercedCountytoSanLuisObispoCounty
Mesicareaswithheavyclaysoils,inswalesandclayflats;inoakwoodland,grassland;between650–3,300feet;bloomsMay–June
Occursinprogramarea
HairlesspopcornflowerPlagiobothrysglaber
–/–/1A CoastalvalleysfromMarinCountytoSanBenitoCounty
Alkalinemeadows;bloomsApril–May
NearestoccurrenceinLivermore(extirpated)
RaylessragwortSenecioaphanactis
–/–/2.2 ScatteredlocationsinCentralWesternCaliforniaandSouthwesternCalifornia,fromAlamedaCountytoSanDiegoCounty
Oakwoodland,coastalscrub;opensandyorrockyareas;bloomsJanuary–April
Occursinprogramarea
SalinecloverTrifoliumdepauperatumvar.hydrophilum
–/–/1B.2 SacramentoValley,centralwesternCalifornia
Saltmarsh,mesicalkalineareasingrasslands,vernalpools,below990feet(300m);bloomsApril–June
NearestoccurrenceinLivermore
Caper‐fruitedtropidocarpumTropidocarpumcapparideum
–/–/1B.1 HistoricallyknownfromthenorthwestSanJoaquinValleyandadjacentCoastRangefoothills
Grasslandsinalkalinehillsbelow500feet;bloomsMarch–April
Occursinprogramarea
a Statusexplanations:
Federal– = nostatus.E = listedas“endangered”underthefederalEndangeredSpeciesAct.
State– = nostatus.E = listedas“endangered”undertheCaliforniaEndangeredSpeciesAct.R = listedas“rare”undertheCaliforniaEndangeredSpeciesAct.
CaliforniaRarePlantRank1A = plantspresumedextinctinCalifornia.1B = rare,threatened,orendangeredinCaliforniaandelsewhere.2 = rare,threatened,orendangeredinCalifornia,butmorecommonelsewhere.0.1 = seriouslyendangeredinCalifornia.0.2 = fairlyendangeredinCalifornia.0.3 = notveryendangeredinCalifornia.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐23
October 2014ICF 00323.08
foothills.Itgrowsiniodinebushscrub,alkalimeadow,andalkaligrasslands.Itisgenerallyfoundatlowelevations,buthasbeencollectedupto820feetabovesealevel.Intheprogramarea,SanJoaquinspearscalehasbeenrecordedinalkaliwetlandsalongAltamontPassRoad,BrunsRoad,andMountainHouseRoad(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Potentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinalkaliwetlandsintheprogramarea;alkaliwetlandsoccurintheGoldenHillsprojectareabutnotinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Lesser Saltscale
LessersaltscalehasnofederalorstatelistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.1.ItisknownprimarilyfromtheSanJoaquinValleyandtheLivermoreValley,althoughotherdisjunctoccurrenceshavebeenreportedinButteandwesternAlamedaCounties(Zacharias2012:634–636;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Lessersaltscaleoccursinvalleysinkscrubandalkaligrasslandhabitatsonsandy,alkalisoils,oftenonthemarginsofslickspotsoralkalinerainpools.Intheprogramarea,lessersaltscalehasbeenreportedfromalkaliwetlandsalongDyerRoad(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Potentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinalkaliwetlandsintheprogramarea;alkaliwetlandsoccurintheGoldenHillsprojectareabutnotinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Big Tarplant
BigtarplanthasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.1.ItisknownfromtheeasternSanFranciscoBayAreaandthenorthwesternSanJoaquinValley(Baldwin2012).Bigtarplantoccursinannualgrasslandonclaytoclay‐loamsoils,usuallyonslopesandofteninburnedareas,below1,500feet.Intheprogramarea,bigtarplantoccursinthevicinityofCorralHollowRoadandtheMidwaySubstation(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).PotentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinCaliforniaannualgrasslandintheprogramarea,includingintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas.
Round‐Leaved Filaree
Round‐leavedfilareehasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.1.ItisknownfromscatteredoccurrencesintheCentralValley,southernNorthCoastRanges,SanFranciscoBayArea,SouthCoastRanges,ChannelIslands,TransverseRanges,andPeninsularRanges(Alarcónetal.2012;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Itoccursingrasslandsandopen,grassyareasinoakwoodland.Intheprogramarea,round‐leavedfilareeisknownfromsixoccurrencesalongCorralHollowRoad,atLawrenceLivermoreLaboratory’sSite300testarea,alongAltamontPassRoad,atMountainHouse,andinthehillseastofAltamontPassRoadandDyerRoad(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).PotentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinCaliforniaannualgrasslandintheprogramarea,includingtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas.
Lemmon’s Jewelflower
Lemmon’sjewelflowerhasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.1.ItrangesfromthesoutheasternSanFranciscoBayareasouthintotheSouthCoastRangesandadjacentSanJoaquinValley,fromAlamedatoVenturaCounties(Al‐Shehbaz2012:538;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Lemmon’sjewelflowergrowsondryexposedslopesingrasslandsandpinyon‐juniperwoodlands,generallybetween260and4,000feetabovesealevel.Intheprogramarea,oneoccurrenceisknownfromthevicinityofCorralHollowRoad(California
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐24
October 2014ICF 00323.08
DepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).PotentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinCaliforniaannualgrasslandintheprogramarea,includingintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas.
Recurved Larkspur
RecurvedlarkspurhasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.2.RecurvedlarkspurwasformerlywidespreadintheCentralValleyfromColusatoKernCounties,althoughithasbeenextirpatedfromtheSacramentoValley(KoontzandWarnock2012:1411;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Itoccursinchenopodscrubandgrasslandsonpoorlydrained,fine,alkalinesoils(KoontzandWarnock2012:1411).Intheprogramarea,oneoccurrenceofrecurvedlarkspurisknownfromalkaligrasslandsalongBrunsRoad(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Plantcommunitiesintheprogramareathatmayprovidehabitatforrecurvedlarkspurarealkalimeadowandalkaliwetlands.AlkaliwetlandsintheGoldenHillsprojectareamayprovidehabitatforrecurvedlarkspur;therearenoalkaliwetlandsinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Diamond‐Petaled California Poppy
Diamond‐petaledCaliforniapoppyhasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.1.ThisspecieswasknownhistoricallyfromtheinteriorfoothillsoftheNorthandSouthCoastRangesbutiscurrentlyknownfromonlythreelocationsinAlamedaandSanLuisObispoCounties(HannanandClark2012:984;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Diamond‐petaledCaliforniapoppygrowsinclaysoilswithinCaliforniaannualgrassland.Intheprogramarea,diamond‐petaledCaliforniapoppyisknownfromtwolocationsatLawrenceLivermoreLaboratory’sSite300testarea,northofCorralHollowRoad(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).PotentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinCaliforniaannualgrasslandintheprogramarea,includingintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas.
Shining Navarretia
ShiningnavarretiahasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.2.ThisspeciesrangesthroughouttheSouthCoastRanges,althoughadditionaloccurrencesarereportedfromthecentralSanJoaquinValley(Johnson2012:1066;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Shiningnavarretiagrowsonclaysoilsingrasslandsandoakwoodland,sometimesinassociationwithdryingdepressions.Intheprogramarea,shiningnavarretiaisknownfromasingleoccurrenceatLawrenceLivermoreLaboratory’sSite300testarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).PotentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinCaliforniaannualgrasslandintheprogramarea,includingtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas,andinblueoakwoodland,whichdoesnotoccurintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas.
Rayless Ragwort
RaylessragworthasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof2.2.ItisknownfromscatteredlocationsintheCaliforniaCoastRangessouthofSanFranciscoBay,theTransverseRanges,southwestCalifornia(includingSantaCruzIsland),andBajaCalifornia(Preston2000).Itisfoundinareaswithlowvegetationcoveringrasslandandcoastalscrub,onvarioussubstrates:clay,coarsesand,rockoutcrops(includingserpentinite),andsoilswithhighgypsumcontentorhighalkalinity(Preston2000).Intheprogramarea,raylessragwortisknownfromasingleoccurrenceinthevicinityofCorralHollowRoad(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐25
October 2014ICF 00323.08
2013b).Rockoutcropsintheprogramareaarepotentialhabitatforthisspecies.RockoutcropsdonotoccurintheGoldenHillsorPattersonPassprojectsareas.
Caper‐Fruited Tropidocarpum
Caper‐fruitedtropidocarpumhasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.1.ItwashistoricallyknownfromthenorthwestSanJoaquinValleyandadjacentDiabloRangefoothills,butalloftheseoccurrencesarebelievedtobeextirpated.IthasrecentlybeenreportedtooccurinFresno,Monterey,andSanLuisObispoCounties.Itgrowsonclaysoilsingrasslands.Intheprogramarea,caper‐fruitedtropidocarpumisknownfromasingleoccurrencenearMountainHouse(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).PotentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinCaliforniaannualgrasslandintheprogramarea,includingintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas.
Special‐Status Wildlife
BasedontheUSFWSspecieslist(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2013b);CNDDB(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c)recordssearchforthequadranglesoverlappingtheprogramarea(Altamont,CedarMountain,ByronHotSprings,CliftonCourtForebay,andMidway);andfatalityrecordsfromAPWRAfatalitymonitoring,36special‐statuswildlifespecieswereidentifiedashavingpotentialtooccurintheprogramarea.Ofthese35species,9weredeterminedtohavelowornopotentialtooccurintheprogramareaandarenotdiscussedfurther(Table3.4‐5);26ofthe35speciesareknowntooccurorhaveamoderatetohighlikelihoodofoccurringwithintheprogramareabecausesuitablehabitatispresent(longhornfairyshrimp,vernalpoolfairyshrimp,vernalpooltadpoleshrimp,valleyelderberrylonghornbeetle[Desmoceruscalifornicusdimorphus],curved‐foothygrotusdivingbeetle,Californiatigersalamander,westernspadefoot[Speahammondii],Californiared‐leggedfrog,foothillyellow‐leggedfrog[Ranaboylii],westernpondturtle,Blainville’s[coast]hornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,SanJoaquincoachwhip[Masticophisflagellumruddocki],white‐tailedkite,northernharrier,Swainson’shawk,goldeneagle,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike,tricoloredblackbird,littlebrownbat,westernredbat,hoarybat,pallidbat,Americanbadger,andSanJoaquinkitfox).Inadditiontothese26species,threespecies(baldeagle,Townsend’sbig‐earedbat,andsilver‐hairedbat)wereaddedtothistablebasedonsuitablehabitatconditionsandprofessionaljudgment.ItshouldbenotedthattheCNDDBisapresence‐onlydatabasethatdependsonvoluntarysubmissionofspecieslocationdataandisnotacompletedatabaseofspecieslocations.
AllwildlifespeciesconsideredarelistedinTable3.4‐5,whichpresentstheirregulatorystatus,distribution,habitatrequirements,andarationalefortheirpotentialtooccurintheprogramarea.The29special‐statuswildlifespeciesthatareknowntooccurorhaveamoderatetohighpotentialtooccurintheprogramareaarediscussedbrieflybelow.
Inadditiontohabitatconditions,APWRAfatalitydata,andCNDDBdata,informationfromavianusesurveysoftheprogramareacollectedbytheAFMTwasusedtoevaluatethepotentialforspecial‐statusbirdstooccurintheprogramareaandtobepotentiallyadverselyaffectedbyconstructionandoperationofnewwindturbines.Collectionofavianusedatawasinitiatedin2004andinvolvessamplingavianpresenceat70–90observationpointsdistributedthroughouttheAPWRAfor10–30minutesateachobservationpoint.ThemethodsusedtoestimateavianfatalityratesandtomeasureandmonitoravianuseoftheprogramareaaredetailedintheAltamontPassWindResourceAreaBirdFatalityStudy,BirdYears2005–2011(ICFInternational2013).
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐26
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Longhorn Fairy Shrimp
Longhornfairyshrimpisfederallylistedasendangered.TherangeoflonghornfairyshrimpisrestrictedtotheeasternedgeofthecentralCoastRanges.ThespecieshasbeenfoundinthefoothillgrasslandswestofTracy,atKestersonNationalWildlifeRefugeinMercedCounty,andnearSodaLakeinSanLuisObispoCounty(EriksenandBelk1999:91).
Longhornfairyshrimphavebeenfoundinclear‐waterdepressionalpoolsinsandstoneoutcrops,ingrasslandpools,andinpoolsinvalleysaltbushscrub.ThespecieshasbeenobservedfromlateDecembertomid‐Mayinpoolsthatarefilledbywinterandspringrains.Inhabitedpoolsinsandstoneoutcropstendtobeverysmallwithclearwaterandlowlevelsofsolublesubstances.Clay‐andgrass‐bottomedpoolsthatlonghornfairyshrimpinhabitarecleartofairlyturbid.Poolswherelonghornfairyshrimpoccurareprobablyshort‐lived(approximately3weeks).Larvaehatchsoonafterpoolsfillandwatertemperatureisapproximately10ºC.Longhornfairyshrimpneedwatertemperaturesof15–20ºCtoattainmaturity.Maturationisachievedin23daysunderoptimalconditions,but43daysismoretypical(EriksenandBelk1999:91‐92).
Intheprogramarea,seasonalwetlandsandrockoutcropsprovidesuitablehabitatforlonghornfairyshrimp.ThereisoneCNDDBrecordforanoccurrenceoflonghornfairyshrimpinthenortheastportionoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Thereisanadditionalrecordforanoccurrenceoflonghornfairyshrimpwithin0.5milenorthoftheprogramarea.LonghornfairyshrimpisalsoknowntooccurneartheprogramareaatBrushyPeakPreserve(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2007:3).Criticalhabitatforlonghornfairyshrimpislocatedinthenorthwestportionoftheprogramarea(Figure3.4‐4).
Grass‐bottomseasonalpoolsandrockoutcroppoolsthataresuitableforlonghornfairyshrimpmaybepresentwithintheGoldenHillsprojectarea.OneseasonalwetlandinthePattersonPassprojectareaprovidessuitablehabitatforlonghornfairyshrimp.AlthoughrockoutcropsarepresentinthePattersonPassprojectarea,theydonotcontainsuitablepoolhabitatforlonghornfairyshrimp.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesoflonghornfairyshrimpineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).ThereisnodesignatedcriticalhabitatforlonghornfairyshrimpintheGoldenHillsorPattersonPassprojectareas(Figure3.4‐4).
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp
Vernalpoolfairyshrimpisfederallylistedasthreatened.ThespeciesisfoundfromShastaCountyinthenorththroughouttheCentralValleytoTulareCountyandwesttothecentralCoastRanges.DisjunctpopulationsoccurinSanLuisObispo,SantaBarbara,andRiversideCounties(EriksenandBelk1999:92,125).Vernalpoolfairyshrimpinhabitsandstonedepressionpoolsandvernalpoolsingrasslandhabitats.Vernalpoolfairyshrimparemostcommonlyfoundingrassormud‐bottomedswales,earthslumps,orbasalt‐flowdepressionpoolsinunplowedgrasslands(Engetal.1990:257).Thechemicalcompositionofthehabitatandwatertemperaturevariationsresultingfrompoolsfillingatdifferenttimesanddistributionofpoolsalongaltitudinalandlongitudinalgradientsarethemostimportantfactorsindeterminingthedistributionofdifferentspeciesoffairyshrimp(Engetal.1990:273).Vernalpoolfairyshrimpalsooccurinotherwetlandsthatprovidehabitatcharacteristicssimilartothoseofvernalpools;theseotherwetlandsincludealkalinerainpools,rockoutcroppools,andsomedisturbedandconstructedsites(59FR48136–48153,September16,1994;EriksenandBelk1999:93).Occupiedhabitatsrangeinsizefrom6‐square‐footpuddlestopoolsexceeding24acres.Suitablepoolsmuststayinundatedlongenoughforvernalpoolfairyshrimptocompletetheirlifecycle,whichtypicallytakes3–6weeks(EriksenandBelk1999:93).Vernalpoolfairyshrimpis
Table 3.4‐5. Special‐Status Wildlife Species Known or with Potential to Occur in the Altamont Pass Wind Repowering Program Area Page 1 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
Invertebrates
ConservancyfairyshrimpBranchinectaconservatio
E/–/– DisjunctoccurrencesinSolano,Merced,Tehama,Ventura,Butte,andGlennCounties
Large,deepvernalpoolsinannualgrasslands
Low—suitablehabitatmaybepresentbutnotknowntooccurinAlamedaCounty.
LonghornfairyshrimpBranchinectalongiantenna
E/–/– EasternmarginofcentralCoastRangesfromContraCostaCountytoSanLuisObispoCounty;disjunctpopulationinMaderaCounty
Small,clearpoolsinsandstonerockoutcropsofcleartomoderatelyturbidclay‐orgrass‐bottomedpools
High—suitablehabitatpresentintheprogramarea;knownpopulationatBrushyPeakPreservenearprogramarea;designatedcriticalhabitatforthespeciesoverlapswithasmallportionoftheprogramarea.
VernalpoolfairyshrimpBranchinectalynchi
T/–/– CentralValley,centralandsouthCoastRangesfromTehamaCountytoSantaBarbaraCounty;isolatedpopulationsalsoinRiversideCounty
Commoninvernalpools;alsofoundinsandstonerockoutcroppools
High—alkaliandseasonalwetlandsintheprogramareaprovidepotentialhabitatforthespecies;occurrencesknowninprogramarea.
VernalpooltadpoleshrimpLepiduruspackardi
T/–/– ShastaCountysouthtoMercedCounty Vernalpoolsandephemeralstockponds
High—programareaiswithinthespeciesknownrangeandstockpondsandalkaliwetlandsintheprogramareaprovidepotentialhabitatforthespecies.Notknowntooccurinprogramarea.
ValleyelderberrylonghornbeetleDesmoceruscalifornicusdimorphus
T/–/– Streamsidehabitatsbelow3,000feetabovesealevelthroughouttheCentralValley.
Riparianandoaksavannahabitatswithelderberryshrubsandstreamsidehabitatsbelow3,000feetabovesealevel.Elderberryshrubisthehostplant.
Moderate—projectareasupportselderberryshrubs,butnoCNDDBoccurrencesinprogramarea.
Curved‐foothygrotusdivingbeetleHygrotuscurvipes
–/–/– KelloggCreekwatershedandonesitenearOakley,ContraCostaCountyandAlamedaCounty
Aquatic;smallseasonalpoolsandwetlandsandsmallpoolsleftindrycreekbeds,associatedwithalkaline‐tolerantvegetation
High—suitablehabitatinprogramarea;severalCNDDBoccurrencesinnorthwesternportionofprogramarea.
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 2 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
Fish
GreensturgeonAcipensermedirostris
T/SSC/– InmarinewatersofthePacificOceanfromtheBeringSeatoEnsenada,Mexico.InriversfromBritishColumbiasouthtotheSacramentoRiver,primarilyintheKlamath/TrinityandSacramentoRivers.
Primarilymarine,usinglargeanadromousfreshwaterriversandassociatedestuariesforspawningandrearing.
None—outsideofspeciesknownrangeandnosuitablehabitatintheprogramarea.
DeltasmeltHypomesustranspacificus
T/T/– PrimarilyintheSacramento–SanJoaquinEstuary,buthasbeenfoundasfarupstreamasthemouthoftheAmericanRiverontheSacramentoRiverandMossdaleontheSanJoaquinRiver;rangeextendsdownstreamtoSanPabloBay.
OccursinestuaryhabitatintheDeltawherefreshandbrackishwatermixinthesalinityrangeof2–7partsperthousand(Moyle2002).
None—outsideofspeciesknownrange.
CentralCaliforniaCoaststeelheadOncorrhynchusmykiss
T/–/– CoastaldrainagesalongthecentralCaliforniacoast.
Ananadromousfishthatspawnsandspendsaportionofitslifeininlandstreams,typicallymaturingintheopenocean
None—outsideofspeciesknownrangeandnosuitablehabitatintheprogramarea.
CentralValleysteelheadOncorrhynchusmykiss
T/–/– SacramentoandSanJoaquinRiverandtheirtributaries.
Ananadromousfishthatspawnsandspendsaportionofitslifeininlandstreams,typicallymaturingintheopenocean
None—noperennialstreamssuitableforanadromousfisharepresentintheprogramarea.
CentralValleyspring‐runChinooksalmonOncorhynchustshawytscha
T/T/– UpperSacramentoRiverandtributariesofFeatherandYubaRivers
Occursinwell‐oxygenated,cool,riverinehabitatwithwatertemperaturesfrom8.0to12.5°C.Habitattypesareriffles,runs,andpools.Coldwaterpoolsareneededforholdingadults(Moyle2002.)
None—outsideofspeciesknownrange.
SacramentoRiverwinter‐runChinooksalmonOncorhynchustshawytscha
E/E/– MainstemSacramentoRiverbelowKeswickDam(Moyle2002)
Occursinwell‐oxygenated,cool,riverinehabitatwithwatertemperaturesfrom8.0to12.5°C.Habitattypesareriffles,runs,andpools.(Moyle2002.)
None—outsideofspeciesknownrange.
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 3 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
Amphibians
CaliforniatigersalamanderAmbystomacaliforniense
T/T/– CentralValley,includingSierraNevadafoothills,uptoapproximately1,000feet,andcoastalregionfromSonomaCountysouthtoSantaBarbaraCounty
Smallponds,lakes,orvernalpoolsingrasslandsandoakwoodlandsforbreedingandlarvaldevelopment;rodentburrows,rockcrevices,orfallenlogsforcoverforadultsandjuvenilesforsummerdormancy.
High—specieshasbeendocumentedatnumerouslocationswithinandneartheprogramarea.Alluplandandsuitableaquatichabitatswithintheprogramareaareconsideredpotentiallyoccupied.
WesternspadefootSpeahammondii
–/SSC/– SierraNevadafoothills,CentralValley,CoastRanges,coastalcountiesinsouthernCalifornia
Shallowstreamswithriffles;seasonalwetlands,suchasvernalpoolsinannualgrasslandsandoakwoodlands
High—programareaiswithinthespeciesknownrangeandsuitablehabitatispresentintheprogramarea.
Californiared‐leggedfrogRanadraytonii
T/T/– FoundalongthecoastandcoastalmountainrangesofCaliforniafromMendocinoCountytoSanDiegoCountyandintheSierraNevadafromButteCountytoStanislausCounty.
Permanentandsemipermanentaquatichabitats,suchascreeksandcold‐waterponds,withemergentandsubmergentvegetation;mayestivateinrodentburrows,soilcracks,ordownedlogsduringdryperiods
High—specieshasbeendocumentedatnumerouslocationswithinandneartheprogramarea;alluplandandsuitableaquatichabitatswithintheprogramareaareconsideredpotentiallyoccupied.Theprogramareaisentirelywithindesignatedcriticalhabitatforthespecies.
Foothillyellow‐leggedfrogRanaboylii
–/SSC/– OccursintheKlamath,Cascade,northCoast,southCoast,Transverse,andSierraNevadaRangesuptoapproximately1,800meters(6,000feet).
Creeksorriversinwoodland,forest,mixedchaparral,andwetmeadowhabitatswithrockandgravelsubstrateandlowoverhangingvegetationalongtheedge.Usuallyfoundnearriffleswithrocksandsunnybanksnearby.
Moderate—streamswithintheprogramareathatcontainsuitablesubstrateandcovercouldsupportthespecies;CNDDBrecordsforoccurrenceswithin2milesoftheprogramarea.
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 4 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
Reptiles
WesternpondturtleActinemysmarmorata
–/SSC/– ThewesternpondturtleisuncommontocommoninsuitableaquatichabitatthroughoutCalifornia,westoftheSierra‐Cascadecrestandabsentfromdesertregions,exceptintheMojaveDesertalongtheMojaveRiveranditstributaries.
Occupiesponds,marshes,rivers,streams,andirrigationcanalswithmuddyorrockybottomsandwithwatercress,cattails,waterlilies,orotheraquaticvegetationinwoodlands,grasslands,andopenforests.Nestsaretypicallyconstructedinuplandhabitatwithin0.25mileofaquatichabitat.
High—suitableaquaticanduplandnestinghabitatintheprogramarea;tablehabitat;knowntooccurinandneartheprogramarea.
Blainville’s(Coast)hornedlizardPhyrnosomablainvillii
–/SSC/– SacramentoValley,includingfoothills,southtosouthernCalifornia;CoastRangessouthofSonomaCounty;below1,200meters(4,000feet)innorthernCalifornia.
Grasslands,brushlands,woodlands,andopenconiferousforestwithsandyorloosesoil;requiresabundantantcoloniesforforaging
High—suitablehabitat(grasslandandwoodland)ispresentthroughouttheprogramareaalthoughsuitablesubstrateconditionsmaynotbepresentthroughouttheprogramarea;knowntooccurinandneartheprogramarea.
SilveryleglesslizardAnniellapulchra
–/SSC/– AlongtheCoast,Transverse,andPeninsularRangesfromContraCostaCountytoSanDiegoCountywithspottyoccurrencesintheSanJoaquinValley;elevationrangeextendsfromsealeveltoabout5,100feet.
Occursinmoistwarmloosesoilwithplantcover.Moistureisessential.Habitatconsistofsparselyvegetatedareasofbeachdunes,chaparral,pine‐oakwoodlands,desertscrub,sandywashes,andstreamterraceswithsycamores,cottonwoods,oroaks.Leaflitterundertreesandbushesinsunnyareas,anddunesstabilizedwithbushlupineandmockheatheroftenindicatesuitablehabitat.Usesurfaceobjectssuchasrocks,boards,driftwood,andlogsforcover.
Low—limitedsuitablehabitatinprogramareaandsoilmoistureconditionsunlikely.
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 5 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
GiantgartersnakeThamnophisgigas
T/T/– CentralValleyfromthevicinityofBurrelinFresnoCountytonearChicoinButteCounty.ExtirpatedfromareassouthofFresno.
Sloughs,canals,low‐gradientstreams,andfreshwatermarsheswherethereisapreybaseofsmallfishandamphibians.Alsoirrigationditchesandricefields.Requiresgrassybanksandemergentvegetationforbaskingandareasofhighgroundprotectedfromfloodingduringwinter.
None—programareaisoutsideofspeciesrangeexceptforextremenortheastcornerofprogram;nosuitablehabitatispresentintheprogramareaandnonearbyoccurrences.
AlamedawhipsnakeMasticophislateraliseuryxanthus
T/T/– RestrictedtoAlamedaandContraCostaCounties;fragmentedintofivedisjunctpopulationsthroughoutitsrange
Valleys,foothills,andlowmountainsassociatedwithnortherncoastalscruborchaparralhabitat;requiresrockoutcropsforcoverandforaging
High—suitablegrasslandhabitatispresentthroughouttheprogramareabutvegetationassociations(scrubandchaparral)androckoutcropsaremorelimited;knowntooccurinandneartheprogramarea.Designatedcriticalhabitatforthespeciesoverlapsaportionoftheprogramarea.
SanJoaquincoachwhipMasticophisflagellumruddocki
–/SSC/– FromColusacountyintheSacramentoValleysouthwardtothegrapevineintheSanJoaquinValleyandwestwardintotheinnercoastranges.AnisolatedpopulationoccursatSutterButtes.Knownelevationalrangefrom20to900meters.
Occursinopen,dry,vegetativeassociationswithlittleornotreecover.Itoccursinvalleygrasslandandsaltbushscrubassociations.Oftenoccursinassociationwithmammalburrows
High—suitablegrasslandhabitatispresentwithintheprogramarea;knowntooccurinandneartheprogramarea.
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 6 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
Birds
White‐tailedkiteElanusleucurus
–/FP/– LowlandareaswestofSierraNevadafromtheheadoftheSacramentoValleysouth,includingcoastalvalleysandfoothillstowesternSanDiegoCountyattheMexicoborder
Lowfoothillsorvalleyareaswithvalleyorliveoaks,riparianareas,andmarshesnearopengrasslandsforforaging
High—speciesisknowntooccurintheprogramareaandislikelytoforageintheprogramarea.Largetreessuitablefornestingarelimited.
BaldeagleHaliaeetusleucocephalus
P/E,FP/– NestsinSiskiyou,Modoc,Trinity,Shasta,Lassen,Plumas,Butte,Tehama,Lake,andMendocinoCountiesandintheLakeTahoeBasin;reintroducedintocentralcoast;winterrangeincludestherestofCalifornia,exceptthesoutheasterndeserts,veryhighaltitudesintheSierraNevada,andeastoftheSierraNevadasouthofMonoCounty
InwesternNorthAmerica,nestsandroostsinconiferousforestswithin1mileofalake,reservoir,orstream,ortheocean
Moderate—suitablenestingandforaginghabitatpresentatBethanyReservoir;notknowntooccurintheprogramareabutmaynest,forage,ormovethroughit.
NorthernharrierCircuscyaneus
–/SSC/– ThroughoutlowlandCalifornia;hasbeenrecordedinfallathighelevations
Grasslands,meadows,marshes,andseasonalandagriculturalwetlandsprovidingtallcover
High—suitablenestingandforaginghabitatispresentthroughouttheprogramarea;knowntooccurintheprogramarea.
Swainson’shawkButeoswainsoni
–/T/– LowerSacramentoandSanJoaquinValleys,KlamathBasin,andButteValley.HighestnestingdensitiesoccurnearDavisandWoodland,YoloCounty.
Nestsinoaksorcottonwoodsinornearriparianhabitats.Foragesingrasslands,irrigatedpastures,andgrainfields.
High—speciesisknowntooccurintheprogramareabutislargelyaCentralValleyspeciesandislesslikelytoforageintheprogramarea.Largetreessuitablefornestingarelimited.
GoldeneagleAquilachrysaetos
P/FP/– FoothillsandmountainsthroughoutCalifornia;uncommonnonbreedingvisitortolowlandssuchastheCentralValley
Nestsincliffsandescarpmentsortalltrees;foragesinannualgrasslands,chaparral,oroakwoodlandsthatprovideabundantmediumandlarge‐sizedmammalsforprey
High—suitablenestingandforaginghabitatpresent;knowntooccurinprogramarea.
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 7 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
WesternburrowingowlAthenecunicularia
–/SSC/– LowlandsthroughoutCalifornia,includingtheCentralValley,northeasternplateau,southeasterndeserts,andcoastalareas;rarealongsouthcoast
Level,open,dry,heavilygrazedorlowstaturegrasslandordesertvegetationwithavailableburrows
High—suitablenestingandforaginghabitatispresentthroughouttheprogramarea;numerousknownoccurrencesthroughouttheprogramarea.
LoggerheadshrikeLaniusludovicianus
–/SSC/– ResidentandwintervisitorinlowlandsandfoothillsthroughoutCalifornia;rareoncoastalslopenorthofMendocinoCounty,occurringonlyinwinter
Prefersopenhabitatswithscatteredshrubs,trees,posts,fences,utilitylines,orotherperches.Nestsindenselyfoliagedtreesorshrubs
High—suitablenestingandforaginghabitatpresent;knowntooccurinprogramarea;nestinghabitatislimitedtoareasthatsupportshrubsandtrees.
TricoloredblackbirdAgelaiustricolor
–/SSC/– PermanentresidentintheCentralValleyfromButteCountytoKernCounty;breedsatscatteredcoastallocationsfromMarinCountysouthtoSanDiegoCountyandatscatteredlocationsinLake,Sonoma,andSolanoCounties;rarenesterinSiskiyou,Modoc,andLassenCounties
Nestsindensecoloniesinemergentmarshvegetation,suchastulesandcattails,oruplandsiteswithblackberries,nettles,thistles,andgrainfields;habitatmustbelargeenoughtosupport50pairs;probablyrequireswateratornearthenestingcolony
High—suitablenestingandforaginghabitatpresent;knowntooccurinprogramarea;nestinghabitatislimitedtoareasthatsupportlargerexpansesofemergentfreshwatermarshandblackberry.
Mammals
LittlebrownbatMyotislucifugus
–/–/WBWGModerate
FoundthroughoutthenorthernportionofCalifornia,primarilyathigherelevations.
Oftenassociatedwithconiferousforest.Requiresnearbywater.Roostsinhollowtrees,rockoutcrops,buildings,andoccasionallyminesandcaves.
High—mayroost,forageordrinkintheprogramarea.Assumingidentificationwascorrect,thisspecieshasbeendocumentedinfatalityrecordsatAPWRA.
Silver‐hairedbatLasionycterisnoctivagans
–/–/WBWGModerate
FoundfromtheOregonbordersouthalongthecoasttoSanFranciscoBayandalongtheSierraNevadaandGreatBasinregiontoInyoCounty.AlsooccursinsouthernCaliforniafromVenturaandSanBernardinoCounties.southtoMexico.HasbeenrecordedinSacramento,Stanislaus,MontereyandYoloCounties
Duringspringandfallmigrationsthesilver‐hairedbatmaybefoundanywhereinCalifornia.Summerhabitatsincludecoastalandmontaneconiferousforests,valleyfoothillwoodlands,pinyon‐juniperwoodlands,andvalleyfoothillandmontaneriparianhabitats.Roostsinhollowtrees,snags,buildings,rockcrevices,caves,andunderbark.
Moderate—mayroost,forageordrinkintheprogramarea;fewfatalityrecordsfromwindfarmsintheDelta,approximately25milesnorth/northwest.Thisspecieshasbeenacousticallydocumentedataneighboringwindfarm(Pandion2010).
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 8 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
WesternredbatLasiurusblossevillii
–/SSC/WBWGHigh
CoastalareasfromtheSanFranciscoBayareasouth,plustheCentralValleyandsurroundingfoothills,withalimitednumberofrecordsfromsouthernCalifornia,extendingasfareastaswesternRiversideandcentralSanDiegocounties,upperSacramentoRivernearDunsmuir,SiskiyouCounty.
Foundprimarilyinriparianandwoodedhabitats.Occursatleastseasonallyinurbanareas.Dayroostsintreeswithinthefoliage.FoundinfruitorchardsandsycamoreriparianhabitatsintheCentralValley.
High—mayroost,forageordrinkintheprogramarea.DocumentedinfatalityrecordatAPWRA.
HoarybatLasiuruscinereus
–/–/WBWGModerate
OccursthroughoutCaliforniafromsealevelto13,200feet.Statewideinwoodedareas.WinterinsouthernCalifornia.
Primarilyroostsinforestedhabitats.Alsofoundinriparianareasandinparkandgardensettingsinurbanareas.Dayroostswithinfoliageoftrees.
High—mayroost,forageordrinkintheprogramarea.DocumentedinfatalityrecordatAPWRA.
Townsend’sbig‐earedbatCorynorhinustownsendii
–/SSC/WBWGHigh
WidespreadthroughoutCalifornia,fromlowdeserttomid‐elevationmontanehabitats.
Roostsincaves,tunnels,mines,buildings,andothercave‐likespaces.Willnightroostinmoreopensettings,includingunderbridges.
Moderate—Mayroostincavesorstructureswithinoradjacenttotheprogramarea;couldforageordrinkwithinprogramarea.
PallidbatAntrozouspallidus
–/SSC/WBWGHigh
OccursthroughoutCaliforniaexceptthehighSierrafromShastatoKernCountyandthenorthwestcoast,primarilyatlowerandmidelevations(upto6,000feet).
Occursinavarietyofhabitatsfromdeserttoconiferousforest.Mostcloselyassociatedwithoak,mixedconifer,redwood,andgiantsequoiahabitatsinnorthernCaliforniaandoakwoodland,grassland,anddesertscrubinsouthernCalifornia.Reliesheavilyontreesforroostsbutalsousescaves,mines,bridges,andbuildings.
High—mayroost,forageordrinkintheprogramarea;onerecordforanoccurrencewithin5milesoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 9 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
AmericanbadgerTaxideataxus
–/SSC InCalifornia,badgersoccurthroughoutthestateexceptinhumidcoastalforestsofnorthwesternCaliforniainDelNorteandHumboldtCounties
Occursinawidevarietyofopen,aridhabitatsbutaremostcommonlyassociatedwithgrasslands,savannas,mountainmeadows,andopenareasofdesertscrub;theprincipalhabitatrequirementsforthespeciesappeartobesufficientfood(burrowingrodents),friablesoils,andrelativelyopen,uncultivatedground.
High—suitablegrasslandhabitatthroughouttheprogramarea;knowntooccurwithinandneartheprogramarea.
SanJoaquinkitfoxVulpesmacrotismutica
E/T PrincipallyoccursintheSanJoaquinValleyandadjacentopenfoothillstothewest;recentrecordsfrom17countiesextendingfromKernCountynorthtoContraCostaCounty
Saltbushscrub,grassland,oak,savanna,andfreshwaterscrub.
High—suitablegrasslandhabitatispresentthroughouttheprogramarea;althoughrecentsightingsarelimited,thespecieshasbeendocumentedatseverallocalitieswithinandneartheprogramarea.
a Statusexplanations:
Federal
E = listedasendangeredunderthefederalEndangeredSpeciesAct.T = listedasthreatenedunderthefederalEndangeredSpeciesAct.– = nolisting.
State
E = listedasendangeredundertheCaliforniaEndangeredSpeciesAct.T = listedasthreatenedundertheCaliforniaEndangeredSpeciesAct.FP = fullyprotectedundertheCaliforniaFishandGameCode.SSC = speciesofspecialconcerninCalifornia.– = nolisting.
Other
WesternBatWorkingGroup(WBWG)Priority
High = speciesareimperiledorathighriskofimperilment.Moderate = thisdesignationindicatesalevelofconcernthatshouldwarrantcloserevaluation,moreresearch,andconservationactionsofboththespeciesand
possiblethreats.Alackofmeaningfulinformationisamajorobstacleinadequatelyassessingthesespecies'statusandshouldbeconsideredathreat.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐27
October 2014ICF 00323.08
notfoundinriverine,marine,orotherpermanentwaters(59FR4813648153,September16,1994).
Alkaliandseasonalwetlandsintheprogramareaprovidesuitablehabitatforvernalpoolfairyshrimp.ThereisoneCNDDBrecordforanoccurrenceofvernalpoolfairyshrimpinthenorthwestportionoftheprogramareaandfiveadditionalrecordsforoccurrencesthatarewest,north,andnortheastoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Thereisnodesignatedcriticalhabitatforvernalpoolfairyshrimpwithintheprogramarea(Figure3.4‐4).
AlkaliandseasonalwetlandsthatprovidesuitablehabitatforvernalpoolfairyshrimpmaybepresentwithintheGoldenHillsprojectarea;however,habitatsurveyshavenotbeenconducted.OneseasonalwetlandinthePattersonPassprojectareaprovidessuitablehabitatforvernalpoolfairyshrimp.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofvernalpoolfairyshrimpineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Vernal Pool Tadpole Shrimp
Vernalpooltadpoleshrimpisfederallylistedasendangered.ThisspeciesisaCaliforniaCentralValleyendemicspecies,withthemajorityofpopulationsintheSacramentoValley.VernalpooltadpoleshrimphasalsobeenreportedfromtheSacramentoRiverDeltaeastofSanFranciscoBayandfromscatteredlocalitiesintheSanJoaquinValleyfromSanJoaquintoMaderaCounties(Rogers2001:1002).
Vernalpooltadpoleshrimpoccurinawidevarietyofseasonalhabitatsincludingvernalpools,pondedclayflats,alkalinepools,ephemeralstocktanks,androadsideditches.Habitatswherevernalpooltadpoleshrimphavebeenobservedrangeinsizefromsmall(lessthan25squarefeet),clear,vegetatedvernalpoolstohighlyturbidalkaliscaldpoolstolarge(morethan100acres)winterlakes(Helm1998:134–138;Rogers2001:1002–1005).Thesepoolsandotherephemeralwetlandsmustdryoutandbeinundatedagainforthevernalpooltadpoleshrimpcyststohatch.Thisspecieshasnotbeenreportedinpoolsthatcontainhighconcentrationsofsodiumsalts,butmayoccurinpoolswithhighconcentrationsofcalciumsalts(Helm1998:134–138;Rogers2001:1002–1005).
Seasonalwetlandsandephemeralpondsintheprogramareathatremaininundatedforaminimumof6–8weekswouldprovidesuitablehabitatforvernalpooltadpoleshrimp.AlthoughtherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofvernalpooltadpoleshrimpintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c),theprogramareaislocatedwithintheirknownrange.Thereisnodesignatedcriticalhabitatforvernalpooltadpoleshrimpwithintheprogramarea.
SeasonalwetlandsandephemeralpondsthatprovidesuitablehabitatforvernalpooltadpoleshrimpmaybepresentwithintheGoldenHillsprojectarea.OneareaofperennialfreshwatermarshinthePattersonPassprojectareaprovidessuitablehabitatforvernalpooltadpoleshrimp.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofvernalpooltadpoleshrimpineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle
Valleyelderberrylonghornbeetleisfederallylistedasthreatened.OnOctober2,2012,USFWSproposedtoremovevalleyelderberrylonghornbeetlefromthefederallistofendangeredandthreatenedspecies(77FR60237–60276).Theproposedrule,ifmadefinal,wouldalsoremovethedesignationofcriticalhabitatforthesubspecies.ThepubliccommentperiodontheproposeddelistingendedDecember3,2012,andwasextendedthroughJanuary23,2013(78FR4812–4813).
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐28
October 2014ICF 00323.08
USFWSwillreviewcommentsandmakeafinaldeterminationontheproposedrule.Thereisnoofficialtimeperiodforthisdetermination;untilitismade,thebeetleretainsitsprotectedstatusandcriticalhabitatdesignation.
ThecurrentknownrangeofvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleextendsthroughoutCalifornia’sCentralValleyandassociatedfoothillsfromaboutthe3,000‐footcontourontheeastandthewatershedoftheCentralValleyonthewest(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1999:1).Valleyelderberrylonghornbeetleisdependentonitshostplant,elderberry,whichisacommoncomponentofripariancorridorsandadjacentuplandareasintheCentralValley(Barr1991:5).
Valleyelderberrylonghornbeetlehasfourstagesoflife:egg,larva,pupa,andadult.Femalesdepositeggsonoradjacenttothehostelderberry.Eggproductionvaries;femaleshavebeenobservedtolaybetween16and180eggs.Eggshatchwithinafewdaysofbeingdeposited.Larvaeemergeandboreintothewoodofthehostplant,creatingalongfeedinggalleryinthepithoftheelderberrystem.Thelarvaefeedonthepithoftheplantfor1–2years.Whenalarvaisreadytopupate,itchewsanexitholetotheoutsideofthestemandthenplugsitwithfrass.Thelarvathenretreatsintothefeedinggalleryandconstructsapupalchamberfromwoodandfrass.ThelarvaemetamorphosebetweenDecemberandApril;thepupalstagelastsaboutamonth.Theadultremainsinthechamberforseveralweeksaftermetamorphosisandthenemergesfromthechamberthroughtheexithole.Adultsemergebetweenmid‐Marchandmid‐June,thefloweringseasonoftheplant.Adultsfeedonelderberryleavesandmatewithintheelderberrycanopy(Talleyetal.2006:7‐9).
Elderberryshrubsintheprogramareaprovidesuitablehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.Elderberryshrubsmaybeassociatedwiththemixedriparianforestandwoodland,mixedwillowriparianscrub,blueoakwoodland,foothillpine‐oakwoodland,mixedevergreenforestoakwoodland,andgrasslandlandcovertypes.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleintheprogramarea.TheclosestrecordisforthreeadultsobservedatLawrenceLivermoreNationalLaboratorySite300(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
ElderberryshrubsmaybepresentintheGoldenHillsprojectareaandwouldprovidesuitablehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.Elderberryshrubsmaybeassociatedwiththemixedwillowriparianscrubandgrasslandlandcovertypes.AnICFbiologistfound39elderberryshrubsinthePattersonPassprojectareaduringasurveytoassesshabitatsforspecial‐statusspeciesinNovember2013.Severaloftheshrubshadvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleexitholes.
Curved‐Footed Hygrotus Diving Beetle
Curved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetledoesnothaveanystateorfederalstatusbutisconsideredrareunderCEQA.IntheNovember15,1994NoticeofReview(50FR58982–59028),USFWSconcludedthatcurved‐foothygrotusdivingbeetlewaspossiblyappropriateforlistingasthreatenedorendangeredbutlackingpersuasivedatatosupportaproposalforlisting.Itsstatustrendwaslistedasunknown.
Theknownrangeofthecurved‐foothygrotusdivingbeetleislimitedtoContraCostaandAlamedaCounties(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Littleinformationisavailableforthecurved‐foothygrotusdivingbeetle.Thespeciesisknowntoinhabitvernalandseasonalpoolsandwetlands(EssigMuseumofEntomology2013),aswellasstockponds,irrigationcanals,roadsideditches,poolsincreeksandcreekswithslowflows(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Bothlarvalandadultlifestagesarepredaceousand,likeotherspeciesinthefamily,winged
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐29
October 2014ICF 00323.08
adultscandispersebetweenhabitats(PowellandHogue1979).Reasonsfordeclineofthespeciesincludelossofhabitattodevelopmentandnon‐targeteffectsofmosquitocontrol(EssigMuseumofEntomology2013).
Seasonalwetlands,ponds,andsomecreeksintheprogramareamayprovidesuitablehabitatforcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle.TherearethreeCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleinthenorthwestportionoftheprogramareaandeightadditionalrecordsforoccurrencesthatarewest,north,andeastoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Seasonalwetlands,ponds,andsomecreeksmayprovidesuitablehabitatforcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleintheGoldenHillsprojectarea.PondsandsomecreeksmayprovidesuitablehabitatforthisbeetleinthePattersonPassprojectarea.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleineitheroftheprojectareas;howeveroneoftheoccurrencesintheprogramareaisjustoutsideoftheGoldenHillsprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
California Tiger Salamander
TheCentralCaliforniadistinctpopulationsegmentofCaliforniatigersalamander(whichoverlapswiththeprogramarea)isfederallylistedasthreatened(50CFR47212–47248,August4,2004).Californiatigersalamanderisalsostate‐listedasthreatened(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2011).
CaliforniatigersalamanderisendemictotheSanJoaquin–SacramentoRivervalleys,borderingfoothills,andcoastalvalleysofcentralCalifornia(BarryandShaffer1994:159).Californiatigersalamanderisalowlandspeciesrestrictedtograsslandsandlowfoothillregionswhereitsbreedinghabitatoccurs(JenningsandHayes1994:14).Breedinghabitatconsistsoftemporarypondsorpools,slowerportionsofstreams,andsomepermanentwaters(Stebbins2003:153–154).Permanentaquaticsitesareunlikelytobeusedforbreedingunlesstheylackfishpredators(JenningsandHayes1994:14).Californiatigersalamandersalsorequiredry‐seasonrefugesitesinthevicinityofbreedingsites(within1mile)(JenningsandHayes1994:14).Californiagroundsquirrel(Spermophilusbeecheyi)burrowsareimportantrefugesitesforadultsandjuveniles(Loredoetal.1996:283–284).
AdultCaliforniatigersalamandersmovefromsubterraneanrefugesitestobreedingpoolsduringrelativelywarmlatewinterandspringrains(JenningsandHayes1994:12).BreedinggenerallyoccursfromDecemberthroughMarch(Stebbins2003:154).Developmentthroughmetamorphosisrequires3–6months(69FR47215).Metamorphosedjuvenilesleavetheirpondsinthelatespringorearlysummerandmovetoterrestrialrefugesitesbeforeseasonalpondsdry(Loredoetal.1996:282).However,inlatefall1993,onelarvaloverwinteringsalamanderwasobservedinMontereyCountyandmanyoverwinteringsalamanderswereobservedinthreeperennialstockpondsinContraCostaCountyfrom1998to2001(Alvarez2004:344).
Ponds,longerlastingseasonalwetlands,andportionsofdrainagesintheprogramareamayprovidesuitablebreedinghabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,andsurroundinggrasslandsandoakwoodlandprovidesuitableuplandrefugeanddispersalhabitat.Therearenumerous(morethan20)CNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofCaliforniatigersalamanderintheprogramarea.Themajorityoftheseoccurrencesareinthenorthernportionoftheprogramarea.Therearemorethan70additionalrecordsforoccurrencesofCaliforniatigersalamandersurroundingtheprogramarea
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐30
October 2014ICF 00323.08
(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).ThereisnodesignatedcriticalhabitatforCaliforniatigersalamanderintheprogramarea.
PondsandpooledportionsofdrainagesintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasprovidesuitablebreedinghabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,andsurroundinggrasslandsprovidesuitableuplandrefugeanddispersalhabitat.LongerlastingseasonalwetlandsintheGoldenHillsprojectareamayalsoprovidesuitablehabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander.ThereareCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofCaliforniatigersalamanderinbothprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Western Spadefoot
WesternspadefootisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern.Westernspadefootisalowlandtoadthatoccursinwashes,riverfloodplains,alluvialfans,playas,andalkaliflatswithinvalleyandfoothillgrasslands,openchaparral,andpine‐oakwoodlands.Itbreedsinquietstreamsandtemporaryrainpools.Westernspadefootprefershabitatswithopenvegetationandshortgrasseswherethesoilissandyorgravely(Stebbins2003:203).Westernspadefoottoadsspendaconsiderableportionoftheyearundergroundinburrows(Zeineretal.1988:56).Dependingontemperatureandrainfall,egglayingoccursbetweenlateFebruaryandlateMay.Eggshatchwithin6days,andlarvaldevelopmentcanbecompletedwithin3–11weeks(JenningsandHayes1994:94)Recentlymetamorphosedtoadsdisperseafterspendingafewhoursordaysatthepondmargin(Zeineretal.1988:56).
Seasonalwetlands,pooledportionsofdrainages,andephemeralpondsintheprogramareathatremaininundatedforaminimumof4weekswouldprovidesuitablehabitatforwesternspadefoot.AlthoughtherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofwesternspadefootintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c),theprogramareaiswithintheirknownrange.
Seasonalwetlands,pooledportionsofdrainages,andephemeralpondsthatprovidesuitablehabitatforwesternspadefootmaybepresentintheGoldenHillsprojectarea.OneseasonalwetlandandtwopooledareasinadrainageprovidesuitablehabitatforwesternspadefootinthePattersonPassprojectarea.TherearenoCNDDBoccurrencesofwesternspadefootineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
California Red‐Legged Frog
Californiared‐leggedfrogisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcernandisfederallylistedasthreatened.ThetaxonisknownfromisolatedlocationsintheSierraNevada,NorthCoast,andnorthernTransverseRanges.ItisrelativelycommonintheSanFranciscoBayAreaandalongthecentralcoast.Californiared‐leggedfrogisbelievedtobeextirpatedfromtheflooroftheCentralValley(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2002a:5).
Californiared‐leggedfrogsuseavarietyofhabitats;theseincludevariousaquatic,riparian,anduplandhabitats(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2002a:12).However,Californiared‐leggedfrogsmaycompletetheirentirelifecycleinapondorotheraquaticsitethatissuitableforalllifestages(66FR14626).Californiared‐leggedfrogsinhabitmarshes;streams;lakes;ponds;andother,usuallypermanent,sourcesofwaterthathavedenseriparianvegetation(Stebbins2003:225).Habitatconsistsofdeep(atleast2.5feet)stillorslow‐movingwaterwithshrubbyriparianvegetation(willows[Salixsp.],tules[Scirpussp.],orcattails[Typhasp.])(JenningsandHayes1994:64).Californiared‐leggedfrogsarehighlyaquaticandspendthemajorityoftheirlivesintheriparian
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐31
October 2014ICF 00323.08
zone(BrodeandBury1984:32).Adultsmaytakerefugeduringdryperiodsinrodentholesorleaflitterinriparianhabitats(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2002a:14).
Californiared‐leggedfrogsbreedfromNovemberthroughAprilandtypicallylaytheireggsinclustersaroundaquaticvegetation(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2002a:16).LarvaeundergometamorphosisbetweenJulyandSeptember,3.5–7monthsafterhatching(66FR14626).However,larvaehavebeenobservedtotakemorethan1yeartocompletemetamorphosisinfourcountiesincentralcoastCalifornia(Fellersetal.2001:156).
Ponds,perennialmarsh,seasonalwetlands,drainages,andmixedwillowriparianscrubintheprogramareaprovidesuitablebreedingand/orforaging/dispersalhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrog,andsurroundinggrasslandsandoakwoodlandprovidesuitableuplandrefugeanddispersalhabitat.Therearenumerous(morethan40)recordsforoccurrencesofCaliforniared‐leggedfrogthroughouttheprogramarea.TherearemanyadditionalCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofCaliforniared‐leggedfrogsurroundingtheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).TheentireprogramareaiswithindesignatedcriticalhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrog.
Ponds,perennialmarsh,seasonalwetlands,drainages,andmixedwillowriparianscrubwithintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasprovidesuitablebreedingand/orforaging/dispersalhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrog,andsurroundinggrasslandsprovidesuitableuplandrefugeanddispersalhabitat.ThereareCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofCaliforniared‐leggedfroginbothprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).TheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasarelocatedentirelywithindesignatedcriticalhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrog(Figure3.4‐4).
Foothill Yellow‐Legged Frog
Foothillyellow‐leggedfrogisdesignatedasaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern.Historically,foothillyellow‐leggedfrogsoccurredinthecoastalfoothillsandmountainsfromtheOregonbordersouthtoLosAngelesCountyandintheSierraNevadafoothillssouthtoKernCounty(Zweifel1955:215;Stebbins2003:232).ThecurrentrangeexcludescoastalareassouthofnorthernSanLuisObispoCountyandfoothillareassouthofFresnoCountywherethespeciesisapparentlyextirpated(JenningsandHayes1994:67–69).Thespeciescanoccurfromsealevelto6,000feetabovesealevel(Stebbins2003:232).Foothillyellow‐leggedfrogsoccupyrockydrainagesinvalley‐foothillhardwood,valley‐foothillhardwood‐conifer,valley‐foothillriparian,ponderosapine,mixedconifer,coastalscrub,mixedchaparral,andwetmeadowtypesofhabitat(Zeineretal.1988:86).Thestreambedisusuallygravellyorsandyandthestreamgradientisgenerallynotsteep(Zweifel1955:221).Foothillyellow‐leggedfrogsaretypicallyfoundnearwater,especiallynearriffleswithrocksnearbyandsunnybanks(Stebbins2003:232).Foothillyellow‐leggedfrogsareactivefromlateFebruaryorearlyMarchthroughsummerandintothefall(Zweifel1955:226).Thespeciesbreedsfrommid‐MarchtoMayafterthehigh‐waterstageinstreamshaspassedandlesssedimentisbeingconveyed(Stebbins1954:130).
Perennialandintermittentdrainagesandmixedwillowriparianscrubintheprogramareamayprovidesuitablehabitatforfoothillyellow‐leggedfrog.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesoffoothillyellow‐leggedfrogwithintheprogramarea;howevertherearetworecordsforoccurrencesthataresouthandsouthwestoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐32
October 2014ICF 00323.08
PerennialandintermittentdrainagesandmixedwillowriparianscrubintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasmayprovidesuitablehabitatforfoothillyellow‐leggedfrog.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesoffoothillyellow‐leggedfrogineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Western Pond Turtle
WesternpondturtleisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern.InCalifornia,therangeisdiscontinuouslydistributedthroughoutthestatewestoftheCascade‐Sierrancrest(JenningsandHayes1994:99).Aquatichabitatsusedbywesternpondturtlesincludeponds,lakes,marshes,rivers,streams,andirrigationditcheswithamuddyorrockybottomingrassland,woodland,andopenforestareas(Stebbins2003:250).Westernpondturtlesspendaconsiderableamountoftimebaskingonrocks,logs,emergentvegetation,mudorsandbanks,orhuman‐generateddebris(Jenningsetal.1992:11).Westernpondturtlesmovetouplandareasadjacenttowatercoursestodepositeggsandoverwinter(JenningsandHayes1994:98).Turtleshavebeenobservedoverwinteringseveralhundredmetersfromaquatichabitat.Inthesouthernportionoftherangeandalongthecentralcoast,westernpondturtlesareactiveyear‐round.Intheremainderoftheirrange,theseturtlestypicallybecomeactiveinMarchandreturntooverwinteringsitesbyOctoberorNovember(Jenningsetal.1992:11).
Ponds,reservoirs,BrushyCreek,andportionsofotherdrainagesintheprogramareamayprovidesuitableaquatichabitatforwesternpondturtle.Theymayalsodepositeggsinmixedwillowriparianscruborgrasslandareasnearaquatichabitatintheprogramarea.TherearetwoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofwesternpondturtlewithintheprogramareaandmanyadditionalrecordsforoccurrenceswithin5milesoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
PondsandportionsofdrainagesintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasmayprovidesuitableaquatichabitatforwesternpondturtle.TheymayalsodepositeggsinmixedwillowriparianscruborgrasslandareasnearaquatichabitatintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofwesternpondturtleineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Blainville’s (Coast) Horned Lizard
Blainville’shornedlizardisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern.Althoughfragmented,therangeofBlainville’shornedlizardgenerallyextendsalongthePacificcoastfromBajaCaliforniawestofthedesertsandtheSierraNevada,northtotheBayArea,andinlandasfarnorthasShastaReservoir.ItalsooccursontheKernPlateaueastofthecrestoftheSierraNevada(CaliforniaHerps.com2013).Thespeciesoccursbetweensealevelandanelevationof8,000feet(Stebbins2003:301).
Blainville’shornedlizardoccupiesavarietyofhabitats,includingareaswithanexposedgravelly‐sandysubstratesupportingscatteredshrubs,chamisechaparral,annualgrassland(JenningsandHayes1994:132),broadleafwoodland,andconiferforest(Stebbins2003:300).Theyaremostcommoninlowlandsalongsandywasheswithscatteredshrubsforcover.Habitatrequirementsincludeopenareasforbasking;patchesoffine,loosesoilwhereitcanburyitself;andantsandotherinsectprey(Stebbins2003:300–301).Forextendedperiodsofinactivityorhibernation,hornedlizardsoccupysmallmammalburrowsorburrowintoloosesoilsundersurfaceobjects(Zeineretal.1988:48).Blainville’shornedlizardshavebeenobservedtobeactivebetweenAprilandOctober,andhatchlingsfirstappearinJulyandAugust(JenningsandHayes1994:130).
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐33
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Portionsofgrassland,chaparral,andoakwoodlandintheprogramareaprovidesuitablehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard.TherearethreeCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofBlainville’shornedlizardinthesoutheastportionoftheprogramarea,andadditionalrecordsforoccurrencesoutsideoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
PortionsofgrasslandintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasmayprovidesuitablehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,buttherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofBlainville’shornedlizardineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Alameda Whipsnake
Alamedawhipsnakeisstateandfederallylistedasthreatened.TheAlamedawhipsnakeisasubspeciesoftheCaliforniawhipsnake.TheNorthAmericandistributionfortheCaliforniawhipsnakeincludesNorthernCaliforniawestoftheSierranCrestanddeserttocentralBajaCalifornia.Thisspeciesisfoundprimarilyinthefoothillsbutitsrangeextendsintodeciduousandpineforestsofmountains.(Stebbins2003:353–354.)Historically,AlamedawhipsnakeprobablyoccurredwithintheentirecoastalscrubandoakwoodlandcommunitiesthroughouttheEastBayinContraCosta,Alameda,andpartsofSanJoaquinandSantaClaraCounties.Currently,itsdistributionencompassesfiveseparatepopulationswithlittleornointerchangewithinthesesamecounties(70FR60608–60656,October18,2005).
Alamedawhipsnakesareprimarilyfoundwithinamixtureofhabitattypescontainingscrub/shrubcommunities,withasignificantportionofannualgrassland,andotherwoodedhabitatssuchasblueoak‐foothillpine,blueoakwoodland,coastaloakwoodland,valleyoakwoodland,ripariancommunities,orrockoutcrops.Theywillalsomoveintoadjacentgrassland,oaksavannah,andoccasionally,oak‐baywoodlandhabitats.Alamedawhipsnakespreferhabitatswithwoodydebrisandexposedrockoutcrops,whichprovidebaskingareas,shelterfrompredators,andanabundanceofwesternfencelizards,whichareamajorpreyitemofthissnake.Thesubspecieshasbeenobservedtoregularlymove200meters(656feet)fromscrubandchaparralandwillremainingrasslandsforseveralhourstoweeksatatime.Grasslandsareusedextensivelyduringthebreedingseason(MarchthroughJuly).Malesnakesusegrasslandareasextensivelyduringthematingseasonandfemalesnakesusegrasslandsaftermating,possiblytosearchforegg‐layingsites.(70FR60610,October18,2005.)
Annualgrassland,scrub,chaparral,oakwoodland,andmixedwillowriparianscrubintheprogramareaprovidesuitablehabitatforAlamedawhipsnake.TherearesevenCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofAlamedawhipsnakealongtheeasternportionoftheprogramareaandnumerousadditionalrecordsforoccurrencesoutsidebutneartheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).DesignatedcriticalhabitatforAlamedawhipsnakeislocatedinthesoutheastportionoftheprogramarea(Figure3‐4‐4).
AnnualgrasslandandmixedwillowriparianscrubintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasmayprovidesuitablehabitatforAlamedawhipsnake.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofAlamedawhipsnakeineitheroftheprojectareas;howeverthereareseveralrecordsforoccurrencesjustsoutheastoftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).AnICFbiologistconductedhabitatassessmentsforspecial‐statusspeciesinthePattersonPassprojectareaanddeterminedthatAlamedawhipsnakehasalowpotentialtooccurtherebecauseofthedistancetoscrubandchaparralhabitats,whicharetheprimaryhabitatsforthespecies.ThereisnodesignatedcriticalhabitatforAlamedawhipsnakeintheGoldenHillsorPattersonPassprojectareas(Figure3.4‐4).
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐34
October 2014ICF 00323.08
San Joaquin Coachwhip
TheSanJoaquincoachwhip(whipsnake)isoneofsixsubspeciesofthecoachwhipthathasaknownrangeextendingfromColusaCountyintheSacramentoValley,southtotheGrapevineinKernCountyintheSanJoaquinValley,andwesttotheinnerSouthCoastRanges.AnisolatedpopulationoccursintheSutterButtes.Thetaxonisknowntooccurfrom65to2,950feetabovesealevel.SanJoaquincoachwhiplivesinopen,dryvegetativeassociationswithlittleornotreecover.InthewesternSanJoaquinValley,coachwhipinhabitsgrasslandandsaltbushscrubassociations,andisknowntoclimbbushessuchassaltbushtoviewpreyandpredators.MammalburrowsareusedbySanJoaquincoachwhipsforrefugeandlikelyasovipositionsites.Coachwhipsubspecieswillnotemergefromburrowsuntilnear‐surfacetemperaturesreach280Coneitheradailyorseasonalbasis.Forthisreason,emergencetendstobelateintheseason(ApriltoearlyMay)andlaterinthemorning(10–11a.m.),althoughyoungerindividualsmayemergeearlierintheday.Thesubspeciesprimarilyeatslizardsandrobsthenestsofbirdsandmammals,butmayalsoeatcarrion.Landconversionfromgrasslandandgrassland/scrubhabitattoagriculturehasremovedhabitatandeliminatedthefoodbaseandmammalburrowassociationsonwhichthecoachwhipdependsforrefuge.UrbandevelopmentanddroughthavealsobeenimplicatedinthedepletionandfragmentationofSanJoaquincoachwhippopulations(JenningsandHayes1994:162–164).
AnnualgrasslandintheprogramareaprovidessuitablehabitatforSanJoaquincoachwhip.ThereisoneCNDDBrecordforanoccurrenceofSanJoaquincoachwhipalongtheeasternportionoftheprogramareaandtworecordsforoccurrenceseastandwestoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
AnnualgrasslandintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasprovidessuitablehabitatforSanJoaquincoachwhip.TherearenoCNDDBoccurrencesofSanJoaquincoachwhipineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
White‐Tailed Kite
White‐tailedkiteisfullyprotectedundertheCaliforniaFishandGameCode.White‐tailedkitesgenerallyinhabitlow‐elevationgrassland,savannah,oakwoodland,wetland,agricultural,andriparianhabitats.Somelargeshrubsortreesarerequiredfornestingandforcommunalroostingsites.Nesttreesrangefromsmall,isolatedshrubsandtreestotreesinrelativelylargestands(Dunk1995).White‐tailedkitesmakenestsoflooselypiledsticksandtwigs,linedwithgrassandstraw,nearthetopofdenseoaks,willows,andothertreestands.ThebreedingseasonlastsfromFebruarythroughOctoberandpeaksbetweenMayandAugust.White‐tailedkitesforageinundisturbed,opengrassland,meadows,farmland,andemergentwetlands(Zeineretal.1990a:120).
Foraginghabitatandasmallamountofsuitablenestinghabitatforwhite‐tailedkitesarepresentintheprogramarea.TheCNDDBliststworecordsofwhite‐tailedkitenestsinthenortheastandsoutheastportionsoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c)andTwoadditionalrecordswithin2milessouthwestoftheprogramarea.
Suitablenestingandforaginghabitatforwhite‐tailedkiteispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.TherearenoCNDDBoccurrencesofwhite‐tailedkitenestsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).White‐tailedkiteshavebeendocumentedforaginginbothprojectareasduring2005–2011avianusesurveysconductedbytheAFMT(AlamedaCountyunpublisheddata).
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐35
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Bald Eagle
Baldeagleisstate‐listedasendangeredandisprotectedundertheMBTA,theBGEPA,andseveralsectionsoftheCaliforniaFishandGameCode.BaldeagleisapermanentresidentanduncommonwintermigrantinCalifornia(Zeineretal.1990a:122).Baldeaglesbreedatcoastalareas,rivers,lakes,andreservoirswithforestedshorelinesorcliffsinnorthernCalifornia.Winteringbaldeaglesareassociatedwithaquaticareascontainingsomeopenwaterforforaging.Baldeaglesnestintreesinmatureandoldgrowthforeststhathavesomehabitatedgeandaresomewhatclose(within1.25miles)towaterwithsuitableforagingopportunities.Althoughnestscanbecloser,theaveragedistanceofbaldeagleneststohumandevelopmentanddisturbanceismorethan1,640feet(Buehler2000:6).ThebreedingseasonisFebruarythroughJuly(Zeineretal.1990a:122).
Suitablenestingandforaginghabitat(BethanyReservoir)forbaldeagleispresentintheprogramarea.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofbaldeaglenestsorwinteringbaldeaglesinorneartheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c),althoughtheAFMThasdocumentedthemflyingthroughtheprogramareawithincreasingfrequency.
SuitablenestingandforaginghabitatforbaldeaglemaybepresentintheGoldenHillsprojectareanearBethanyReservoir.NosuitablenestingorforaginghabitatispresentinthePattersonPassprojectarea,butbaldeaglesmayforageinorflythroughthisarea.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofbaldeaglenestsorwinteringbaldeaglesineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).TheAFMThasdetectedbaldeaglesfourtimesinthevicinityoftheGoldenHillsprojectareawithinthelast4years,butnotinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Northern Harrier
NorthernharrierisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern.Northernharrierisayear‐roundresidentthroughouttheCentralValleyandisoftenassociatedwithopengrasslandhabitatsandagriculturalfields.Nestsarefoundonthegroundintall,denseherbaceousvegetation(MacWhirterandBildstein1996).NorthernharriernestsfromApriltoSeptember,withpeakactivityinJuneandJuly.Thebreedingpopulationhasbeenreduced,particularlyalongthesoutherncoast,throughthedestructionofwetlandhabitat,nativegrassland,andmoistmeadowsandthroughtheburningandplowingofnestingareasduringearlystagesofbreeding(Zeineretal.1990a:124).
Suitablenestingandforaginghabitatfornorthernharrierispresentintheprogramarea.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofnorthernharriernestswithintheprogramarea;thereisonerecordforanestwithin2milesnortheastoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).TheAFMThasdocumentednorthernharriersforaginginallmonthsoftheyearthroughouttheprogramarea.
SuitablenestinghabitatmaybepresentandsuitableforaginghabitatispresentfornorthernharrierintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.AlthoughtherearenoCNDDBrecordsofnorthernharriernestsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c),theAFMThasdocumentednorthernharriersyear‐roundintheAPWRAasnotedabove.
Swainson’s Hawk
Swainson’shawkisastate‐listedthreatenedspeciesandaspeciesoflocalconservationconcern.Swainson’shawksforageingrasslands,grazedpastures,alfalfaandotherhaycrops,andcertaingrainandrowcroplands.Vineyards,orchards,rice,andcottoncropsaregenerallyunsuitablefor
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐36
October 2014ICF 00323.08
foragingbecauseofthedensityofthevegetation(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame1992:41).ThemajorityofSwainson’shawkswinterinSouthAmerica,althoughsomewinterintheUnitedStates.Swainson’shawksarriveinCaliforniainearlyMarchtoestablishnestingterritoriesandbreed(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame1994).Theyusuallynestinlarge,maturetrees.Mostnestsites(87%)intheCentralValleyarefoundinriparianhabitats(Estep1989:35),primarilybecausetreesaremoreavailablethere.Swainson’shawksalsonestinmatureroadsidetreesandinisolatedtreesinagriculturalfieldsorpastures.ThebreedingseasonisfromMarchthroughAugust(Estep1989:12,35).
AlthoughsuitablenestingandforaginghabitatforSwainson’shawksispresentintheprogramarea,Swainson’shawksmoretypicallyoccurinflatterrainandrarelyoccurinthefoothillsoftheCoastRanges.ThereisoneCNDDBrecordofaSwainson’shawknestinthenortheasternportionoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c),andEastBayRegionalParkDistrict(EBRPD)reportedaSwainson’shawknestingintheprogramarea(Bartonpers.comm.).Thereare11additionalCNDDBrecordsofSwainson’shawknestseastandnortheastoftheprogramarea,includingonethatisjustoutsideoftheprogramarea.Swainson’shawkhasbeendocumentedasafatalityonlyonceinmorethan7yearsofintensivefatalitymonitoring(ICFInternational2013),andonly11sightingsofSwainson’shawkshavebeenrecordedintheprogramareainmorethan7yearsofavianusemonitoringconductedthroughouttheprogramareabytheAFMT(AlamedaCountyunpublisheddata).
ForaginghabitatandasmallamountofsuitablenestinghabitatforSwainson’shawksispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofSwainson’shawknestsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c),and,asnotedabove,theAFMThasrarelyobservedSwainson’shawksintheAPWRA.
Red‐Tailed Hawk
Red‐tailedhawkisnotastate‐orfederallylistedspecies.However,itisprotectedundertheMBTAandtheCaliforniaFishandGameCodeandisanAPWRAfocalspecies.Red‐tailedhawksoccurinCaliforniathroughouttheyear.Largenumbersofmigratoryandwinteringred‐tailedhawksentertheCentralValleyfromOctoberthroughFebruary,substantiallyaugmentingthepopulationoccurringwithinthestate.Migratory,wintering,andresidentred‐tailedhawksinhabitCaliforniainopenareas,suchasgrasslands,agriculturalfields,pastures,andopenbrushhabitats,thatareinterspersedwithpatchesoftreesorstructurallysimilarfeaturesfornesting,perching,androosting(PoliteandPratt1990).Thisspeciesisprimarilyasit‐and‐waitpredatorthatrequireselevatedperchsitesforhunting;however,red‐tailedhawkscanalsobeseensoaringoveropenlandscapesandswoopingforprey.Theirdietincludesawidevarietyofsmalltomedium‐sizedmammals,birds,andsnakes,withoccasionalinsectsandfreshcarrion(PrestonandBeane1993).Nestlocationsvarywithvegetationandtopography.1InthewesternUnitedStates,satellitetrackingindicatesthatadultred‐tailedhawksshowhighfidelitytotheirsummerandwinterrangesandtomigrationroutes(GoodrichandSmith2008).
WhiletheCNDDBdoesnotcontainrecordsforred‐tailedhawks,previousstudiesfoundtheprogramareaandthesurroundingregiontobeanimportantwinterforagingareaandmigrationcorridorforraptors,includingred‐tailedhawks(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame1993).
1Observationsofnestingred‐tailedhawksintheAPWRAin2005to2006wereconfirmedinthefieldbyJones&StokeswildlifebiologistJuliaCamp.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐37
October 2014ICF 00323.08
NaturalperchesfromwhichthisspecieshuntswerescarcebeforedevelopmentoftheAPWRA.Turbinesandtransmissiontowers,poles,andlinesprovideabundantperchesandmayhaveresultedinasubstantialincreaseinwinteringred‐tailedhawksintheprogramareaoverhistoricnumbers(OrloffandFlannery1992).
Golden Eagle
GoldeneagleisfullyprotectedundertheCaliforniaFishandGameCodeandisanAPWRAfocalspecies.ItisalsoprotectedbytheMBTA,theBGEPA,andseveralsectionsoftheCaliforniaFishandGameCode.
Goldeneagleisayear‐roundresidentthroughoutmuchofCalifornia.ThespeciesdoesnotbreedinthecenteroftheCentralValleybutbreedsinmuchoftherestofthestate.Goldeneaglestypicallyoccurinrollingfoothills,mountainareas,sage‐juniperflats,anddeserts(Zeineretal.1990a:142–143).InCalifornia,goldeneaglesnestprimarilyinopengrasslandsandoak(Quercusspp.)savannabutwillalsonestinoakwoodlandandopenshrublands.Goldeneaglesforageinopengrasslandhabitats(Kochertetal.2002:6).Preferredterritorysitesincludethosethathaveafavorablenestsite,adependablefoodsupply(smalltomediummammals,includinggroundsquirrels,andbirds),andbroadexpansesofopencountryforforaging.Hillyormountainouscountrywheretakeoffandsoaringaresupportedbyupdraftsisgenerallypreferredtoflathabitats(Johnsgard1990:262).IntheinteriorcentralCoastRangesofCalifornia,goldeneaglesfavoropengrasslandsandoaksavanna,withlessernumbersinoakwoodlandandopenshrublands.IntheDiabloRangeofCalifornia,allexceptafewpairsnestintreesinoakwoodlandandoaksavannahabitatsduetoalackofsuitablerockoutcropsorcliffs.Nesttreespeciesincludeseveraloakspecies(Quercusspp.),foothillpine(PinussabianianaandP.coulteri),Californiabaylaurel(Umbellulariacalifornica),eucalyptus(Eucalyptusspp.),andwesternsycamore(Platanusracemosa).Afewpairsofeaglesnestonelectricaltransmissiontowerstraversinggrasslands(Huntetal.1999:13).
Suitablenestingandforaginghabitatforgoldeneagleispresentintheprogramarea.TheAPWRAhasbeenreportedtocontainahigherdensityofgoldeneaglesthananywhereelseintheworld(HuntandHunt2006).ThePredatoryBirdResearchGroupestimatedthatatleast70activegoldeneagleterritoriesexistedwithin19milesoftheprogramarea,basedonannualsurveysfromJanuary1994toDecember1997(Huntetal.1999).Theseterritorieswereresurveyedandoccupancyverifiedin2005(HuntandHunt2006).Thegoldeneaglepopulationwithin19milesoftheAPWRAincludessevengoldeneagleterritories/breedingareaswithintheLosVaqueroswatershed.Nestsurveysandmonitoringhavebeenconductedwithinthewatershedfrom1994to2013,and26goldeneagleneststructureshavebeendocumentedduringthisperiod.Sixofthesevenbreedingareaswereoccupiedbygoldeneaglepairsduring2013(CaliforniaEnvironmentalServices2014).Moreover,EBRPDreportedthreehistoricandonerecentgoldeneaglenestswithintheprogramareaandtwoadditionalnestswithin2milesoftheprogramarea(Bartonpers.comm.).TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofgoldeneaglenestswithintheprogramarea;however,thereare10recordsofnestswithin3.5milesnorthandnorthwestoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Inearly2014,ground‐basedsurveysforgoldeneagleswereinitiatedinanexpandedareatocollectinformationonsiteoccupancyandnestingsuccessofthebroaderpopulationofgoldeneaglesintheDiabloMountains.ThisstudyisacollaborativeeffortledbytheU.S.GeologicalSurvey,withtheoverallobjectivebeingtodevelopandevaluatesurveyandmonitoringmethodsforestimatingtrendsinoccurrenceandnestingsuccessofgoldeneagles(U.S.GeologicalSurvey2013).Theresultsofthe2014surveyshavenotyetbeenpublished.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐38
October 2014ICF 00323.08
GoldeneagleisunlikelytonestatPattersonPassbecausethelargerwillowtreespresentarelocatedinadeepravineanddonotofferanopenviewofthelandscape.SuitablenestinghabitatforgoldeneaglemaybepresentintheGoldenHillsprojectarea,andgoldeneaglesmayforageineitherprojectarea.TheCNDDBlistsnooccurrencesofgoldeneaglenestsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
ResearchofthegoldeneaglepopulationintheAPWRAhasrevealedittobestablebutwithreducedresilienceduetoturbine‐relatedmortality.Hunt(2002)examineddatacollectedovera7‐yearperiodbetween1994and2002thatincludedthemonitoringof60–70activeterritorieswithin30kilometers(19miles)oftheAPWRA.In2005,theseterritorieswerefoundstilltobe100%occupied(HuntandHunt2006).TheconclusionsofthesestudieswerethatthegoldeneaglepopulationintheAPWRAregionremainsstable(Hunt2002;HuntandHunt2006).Inaddition,thestudiesfoundnoincreaseinthenumberofactivelybreedingsubadults,indicatingthatthereareenoughfloaterstobufferanylossofbreedingadults(Hunt2002;HuntandHunt2006).TheconclusionofastablegoldeneaglepopulationintheAPWRAvicinitywassupportedbytheresultsofapopulationdynamicsmodelthatusedreproductionratesandfatalityrates,amongothervariables(Hunt2002).However,themodelresultsalsosuggestedthatthenumberofestimatedannualfatalitiesusedinthemodel,50individuals,couldnotbesustainedbythenumberofbreedingadultswhenconsideringthelossofreproductivepotentialincurredbyeacheaglefatality(HuntandHunt2006).AlthoughthevacantterritoriesarefilledbyfloatersandsubadultstostabilizetheAPWRApopulation,theAPWRAvicinitycanbeconsideredapopulationsinkbecausethepopulationdemandsaflowofrecruitsfromoutsidetheareatofillbreedingvacanciesastheyoccur.
HuntandHunt(2006)recommendedfuturestudiesoftheAPWRAgoldeneaglepopulationstobetterunderstandlong‐termtrends.TheU.S.GeologicalSurveyiscurrentlyconductingapopulationinventoryintheAPWRAregion(U.S.GeologicalSurvey2013)tobuildonpreviousresearchbyexpandingsurveysofterritoryoccupancyandnestingsuccesstoincludethebroaderpopulationofgoldeneaglesintheDiabloMountains.Theobjectivesofthestudyareto(1)estimatethebreedingandnonbreedingpopulationandmeasurereproductivesuccess,(2)evaluategoldeneagledetectabilitybasedontemporalandsurveymethodologyfactors,and(3)recommendstrategiesforimprovinggoldennestingsuccessandmethodstomonitortrends(U.S.GeologicalSurvey2013).ThisstudywillhelptoinformfuturemanagementofgoldeneaglesintheAPWRAandsurroundingregion.
American Kestrel
Americankestrelisnotastate‐orfederallylistedspecies.However,itisprotectedundertheMBTAandtheCaliforniaFishandGameCodeandisanAPWRAfocalspecies.TheNorthAmericanBreedingBirdSurveyhasdetectedsignificantdeclinesofAmericankestrelpopulationsinmanyareasoftheUnitedStates,includingCalifornia(SmallwoodandBird2002).
Americankestrelsarefoundinavarietyofopentosemi‐openhabitats,includingmeadows,grasslands,deserts,earlyfieldsuccessionalcommunities,openparkland,agriculturalfields,andbothurbanandsuburbanareas(SmallwoodandBird2002).GrinnellandWythe(1927)describedAmericankestrelasacommonresidentthroughouttheSanFranciscoBayregion.Americankestrelsarecavitynesters,usingtress,snags,rockcrevices,cliffs,banks,andbuildings(PoliteandAhlborn1990).Theydisplaystrongsitefidelitytobreedingterritoriesandwinteringareas;however,littleinformationexistsregardingtheactualdelineationofterritorysize.Thebreedingseasonin
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐39
October 2014ICF 00323.08
CaliforniaoccursbetweenlateFebruaryandAugust,withegglayingoccurringfrommid‐MarchtolateJune(SmallwoodandBird2002).
Americankestrelsforageonawidevarietyofinsects,includinggrasshoppers,cicadas,beetles,dragonflies,butterflies,andmoths;smallrodents,especiallyvolesandmice;andsmallbirds(Sherrod1978).Americankestrelsareperchandpounceorhoverandpouncepredators,rarelypursuingpreyonwing(PoliteandAhlborn1990);theytendtoperchloweraswindspeedincreases(SmallwoodandBird2002).
WhiletheCNDDBdoesnotcontainrecordsforAmericankestrel,previousstudiesintheregionhavefoundtheprogramareavicinitytobeanimportantwinterforagingareaandmigrationcorridorforraptors,includingAmericankestrels(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame1993).NaturalperchesfromwhichthisspecieshuntswerescarcebeforedevelopmentoftheAPWRA.Turbinesandtransmissiontowers,poles,andlinesprovideabundantperchesandhavelikelyresultedinasubstantialincreaseinAmericankestrelnumbersintheAPWRAoverhistoricnumbers(OrloffandFlannery1992).
Prairie Falcon
Prairiefalconisnotastate‐orfederallylistedspecies.However,itisprotectedundertheMBTAandtheCaliforniaFishandGameCodeandisaspeciesoflocalconservationconcernintheAPWRAduetothehighnumberofrecordedfatalities.PrairiefalconinhabitsaridenvironmentsofwesternNorthAmericainopenplainsandshrub‐steppedesertswithcliffs,bluffs,orrockoutcroppings.Anefficientandspecializedpredatorofmedium‐sizeddesertmammalsandbirds,prairiefalconsrangewidely,searchinglargeareasforpatchilydistributedprey.Nesting,postnesting,andwinteringrangesaregenerallywidelyseparated,withmovementsbetweenrangesbeingpotentiallydependentonseasonalavailabilityofprey.Thesediurnalhunterspreypredominantlyongroundsquirrels,smallbirds,reptiles,andinsects.Huntingstrategiesincludestill‐huntingfromperches,soaring,andlowactiveflight(Phipps1979).Prairiefalconsnestoncliffswitheagles,ravens,andred‐tailedhawks,buthavealsobeenknowntousetrees,caves,buildings,andtransmissionlines(Nelson1974;Pitcher1977;HaakandDenton1979;MacLarenetal.1984;Roppeetal.1989;Bunnelletal.1997).
TheCNDDB(2013c)liststwoprairiefalconoccurrenceswithintheprogramarea,and11morewithin10milesoftheprogramareaboundary.Twenty‐sixobservationsofprairiefalconswererecordedduringfixedpointsurveysaroundtheDiabloWindsrepoweringprojectfrom2005to2007(WesternEcosystemsTechnology2008).AtleastfourrecentknownnestsiteshavebeenidentifiedwithintheAPWRAandatleasttwowithin2milesoftheprogramarea.AtelemetrystudyconductedbyEastBayRegionalParksDistrict(unpublisheddata)hasdocumentedextensiveuseoftheprogramareabyprairiefalconsnestingmorethan10milesfromtheprogramarea(FinalPEIRAppendixE,CommentLA‐1‐46).
Barn Owl
Barnowlisnotastate‐orfederallylistedspecies.However,itisontheDFGWatchList,isprotectedundertheMBTAandtheCaliforniaFishandGameCode,andisaspeciesoflocalconservationconcernintheAPWRA.BarnowlisfoundthroughoutmostoftheUnitedStates,exceptinthenorthernportionsoftheRockies,midwest,andnortheast(Martietal.2005).WithinCalifornia,thisspeciesisayear‐roundresidentrangingfromsealevelto5,500feet,preferringhabitatingrasslands,agriculturalfields,chaparral,andmarshesandotherwetlandareas.Barnowlsnestinawidevarietyofcavities,naturalandartificial,suchastrees,cliffs,caves,riverbanks,churchsteeples,
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐40
October 2014ICF 00323.08
barnlofts,haystacks,andnestboxes.Thespecies’breedingnumbersseemlimitedbytheavailabilityofnestcavitiesnearadequatedensitiesofprey.Mosthuntingoccurswhileflyingabout5–15feetabovethegroundinopenhabitats,usingexcellentlow‐lightvisionandsoundtodetectprey(Marti1974;Bunnetal.1982).Barnowlsoccasionallyhuntfromperchesandfeedprimarilyonmice,rats,voles,pocketgophers,andgroundsquirrels.Theyalsoconsumeshrews,insects,crustaceans,reptiles,amphibians,andbirds,includingmeadowlarksandblackbirds(Polite1990).
ThebarnowlbreedingseasoninCaliforniaoccursbetweenJanuaryandNovember,withegglayingpotentiallyoccurringduringmostmonths,asbarnowlstypicallyhavetwobroodsayear(Polite1990;Martietal.2005).Reproductivesuccessvarieswithage,priorbreedingexperience,preyavailability,andweather(Martietal.2005).Barnowlsdefendonlytheimmediatevicinityofthenest,allowingtwoormorepairstonestincloseproximityandsharethesameforaginghabitat.
Thereisnosignificantcontinent‐widebarnowlpopulationtrend.PopulationdeclineshavebeenevidentintheMidwestandNortheast,whilewesternU.S.populationsappeartobemostlystable.Localthreatsordeclinesdonotposeamajorconservationproblemfromaglobalperspective(NatureServe2012).TheCNDDBdoesnotcontainrecordsforbarnowlsastheyarenotastate‐orfederallylistedspecies.Studiesofwind‐turbine‐relatedfatalitiesintheAPWRAhavefoundnumerousbarnowls,suggestingthisspeciesisfairlycommoninportionsoftheprogramarea.BarnowlsareparticularlycommonintheareasofBrushyPeakandVascoCavesRegionalPreserves,usingavailablerockoutcrops,palmtrees,andstructuresfornestingandroosting(EastBayRegionalParksDistrict2000).
Western Burrowing Owl
WesternburrowingowlisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcernandanAPWRAfocalspecies.Westernburrowingowlisayear‐roundresidentintheCentralValley,SanFranciscoBayregion,CarrizoPlain,andImperialValley.Theyoccurprimarilyingrasslandhabitatsbutmayalsooccurinlandscapesthatarehighlyalteredbyhumanactivity.Suitablehabitatmustcontainburrowswithrelativelyshortvegetationandminimalamountsofshrubsortallervegetation.Westernburrowingowlmayalsooccurinagriculturalareasalongroads,canals,ditches,anddrains.TheymostcommonlynestandroostinCaliforniagroundsquirrelburrows,butmayalsouseburrowsdugbyotherspecies,aswellasculverts,pilesofconcreterubble,andpipes.ThebreedingseasonisMarchtoAugust,butcanbeginasearlyasFebruary.Duringthebreedingseason,owlsforageneartheirburrowsbuthavebeenrecordedhuntingupto1.7milesaway.Rodentpopulations,particularlyCaliforniavolepopulations,maygreatlyinfluencesurvivalandreproductivesuccessofCaliforniaburrowingowls(ShufordandGardali2008:219,221).
Suitablenestingandforaginghabitatforwesternburrowingowlispresentintheprogramarea.Thereare30recordsforoccurrencesofbreedingand/orwinteringowlsintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Themajorityoftheserecordsareinthenorthernportionoftheprogramarea.Therearemorethan40additionalCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofburrowingowlsurroundingtheprogramarea.Moreover,westernburrowingowlfatalitieshavebeendocumentedduringAPWRAfatalitysurveys(ICFInternational2013).ArecentstudyconductedundertheauspicesoftheAFMTproducedanestimateoftheAPWRA‐widebreedingseasonpopulationofburrowingowlsofapproximately635pairs(90%confidenceinterval368–903,P228)(Smallwoodetal.2011).
SuitablenestingandforaginghabitatforwesternburrowingowlispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.TherearetwoCNDDBrecordsofoccurrencesofburrowingowlinthe
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐41
October 2014ICF 00323.08
PattersonPassprojectareaandoneCNDDBrecordforburrowingowlintheGoldenHillsprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).BurrowingowlshavebeendocumentedinboththeGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasduringavianusesurveysconductedbytheAFMT(AlamedaCountyunpublisheddata).
Loggerhead Shrike
LoggerheadshrikeisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcernandaspeciesoflocalconservationconcernintheAPWRA.InCalifornia,therangeofloggerheadshrikeextendsthroughoutmostofthestateexceptfortheheavilyforestedareasofthecoastalslope,CoastRanges,KlamathandSiskiyoumountains,SierraNevadaandsouthernCascades,andhighelevationsoftheTransverseRanges.Loggerheadshrikesbreedinshrublandsandopenwoodlandswithgrasscoverandbareground.Theysearchforpreyfromtallshrubs,trees,fences,andpowerlines,andfrequentlyimpaletheirpreyonsharp,thorny,ormulti‐stemmedplantsandbarbed‐wirefences.Loggerheadshrikesforageinopenareaswithshortgrassesandforbsorbareground.(ShufordandGardali2008:274)Nestsarebuiltintreesorshrubswithdensefoliageandareusuallyhiddenwell.ThenestingperiodforloggerheadshrikesisMarchthroughJune(Zeineretal.1990a:546).
Suitablenestingandforaginghabitatforloggerheadshrikeispresentintheprogramarea.TherearethreeCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofloggerheadshrikenestsinthesoutheastportionoftheprogramarea.TherearefouradditionalCNDDBrecordsforoccurrenceseast,southeast,andsouthwestoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).LoggerheadshrikefatalitieshavebeendocumentedduringAPWRAfatalitysurveys(ICFInternational2013),andloggerheadshrikesareregularlydocumentedintheprogramareaduringavianusesurveysconductedbytheAFMT(AlamedaCountyunpublisheddata).
SuitableforaginghabitatforloggerheadshrikeispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas,andsuitablebreedinghabitatmaybepresent.AlthoughtherearenoCNDDBrecordsofloggerheadshrikenestsineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c),loggerheadshrikesareregularlydocumentedinportionsofbothprojectareasduringavianusesurveysconductedbytheAFMT(AlamedaCountyunpublisheddata).
Tricolored Blackbird
TricoloredblackbirdisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern.TricoloredblackbirdisahighlycolonialspeciesthatislargelyendemictoCalifornia.Tricoloredblackbirdbreedingcolonysitesrequireopen,accessiblewater;aprotectednestingsubstrate,includingeitherflooded,thorny,orspinyvegetation;andasuitableforagingspaceprovidingadequateinsectpreywithinafewmilesofthenestingcolony.Tricoloredblackbirdbreedingcoloniesoccurinfreshwatermarshesdominatedbytulesandcattails,inHimalayanblackberries(Rubusarmeniacus),andinsilageandgrainfields(BeedyandHamilton1997:3–4).ThebreedingseasonisfromlateFebruarytoearlyAugust(BeedyandHamilton1999).Tricoloredblackbirdforaginghabitatsinallseasonsincludeannualgrasslands,dryseasonalpools,agriculturalfields(suchaslargetractsofalfalfawithcontinuousmowingschedules,andrecentlytilledfields),cattlefeedlots,anddairies.Tricoloredblackbirdsalsoforageoccasionallyinriparianscrubhabitatsandalongmarshborders.Weed‐freerowcropsandintensivelymanagedvineyardsandorchardsdonotserveasregularforagingsites.Mosttricoloredblackbirdsforagewithin3milesoftheircolonysitesbutcommutedistancesofupto8mileshavebeenreported(BeedyandHamilton1997:5).
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐42
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Surveysduringthe1990s(Hamiltonetal.1995;BeedyandHamilton1997;Hamilton2000)confirmedasignificantdecliningtrendinCaliforniapopulationssincethe1930s,withaparticularlydramaticdeclinenotedafter1994.Statewidesurveysconductedduringthe2000sindicatesomerecoveryfromthe1999low;however,thepopulationincreaseshaveprimarilybeenlimitedtotheSanJoaquinValleyandtheTulareBasin(KyleandKelsey2011).Atotalof145,135tricoloredblackbirdswerecountedduringthemostrecent(2014)statewidesurvey,withMadera,Placer,Sacramento,andTulareCountiesaccountingforabout64%ofthetotalpopulationinApril2014(Meese2014:6,8).Thenumberoftricoloredblackbirdsstatewidedecreasedfromapproximately395,000in2008to259,000in2011,adeclineof34%Breedingsurveysconductedbetween1994and2011documentedtricoloredblackbirdpopulationsthatfluctuatedfromjustunder100,000birdstonearly400,000birds(KyleandKelsey2011).From2011to2014,thenumberoftricoloredblackbirdsdeclinedby44%,fromapproximately259,000to145,000.Thedeclineintricoloredblackbirdsfrom2008to2014was64%.Whilethenumberoftricoloredblackbirdsisdownstatewide,declinesaremostpronouncedintheSanJoaquinValley(78%declinebetween2008and2014)andalongtheCentralCoast(91%declinebetween2008and2014).Conversely,populationsinSacramentoCountyandtheSierraNevadaFoothillshaveincreasedby145%since2008.Overall,therateofdeclineappearstobeaccelerating,andadditionaleffortstoreducetherateofdeclinemaybenecessary(Meese2014:6–7,13–15).
Suitablenestingandforaginghabitatfortricoloredblackbirdispresentintheprogramarea.TherearetwoCNDDBrecordsoftricoloredblackbirdnestingcoloniesintheprogramarea.Thesenestingcoloniesarelocatedinthenorth‐centralportionoftheprogramareaandjustsoutheastofBethanyReservoir.Thereisoneadditionalrecordforatricoloredblackbirdcolonyapproximately1.5mileseastoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).TricoloredblackbirdhasalsobeendocumentedduringAPWRAfatalitysurveys(ICFInternational2013).
SuitableforaginghabitatfortricoloredblackbirdispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas,andsuitablebreedinghabitatmaybepresent.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsoftricoloredblackbirdnestingcoloniesineitheroftheprojectareas;however,thereisonerecordforanestingcolonynearBethanyReservoirjustoutsidetheGoldenHillsprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Little Brown Bat
LittlebrownbatisconsideredamoderatepriorityspeciesinCaliforniabytheWesternBatWorkingGroup(2007).Thespeciesoccursprimarilyinmid‐toupperelevationsinCalifornia.ItisassociatedwithwoodlandhabitatsinbothurbanandwildernessareasbutmayoccuranywhereinCaliforniaduringseasonalmovements.Littlebrownbatsforageoverwaterandalongwoodlandedges.Theyuseawidevarietyofcreviceandcavity‐typeroostsitesintrees,buildings,otherartificialstructures,androckformationsandcaves,andrelyonnightroostsbetweenforagingbouts(Anthonyetal.1981:151).Maternitycoloniescancontainseveralhundredbats.Thespeciescongregatesinmatingswarmsinthefall,thoughmatingcontinuesinhibernaculathroughoutthewinter.Littlebrownbatshibernateincavesandabandonedmines,potentiallyinlargeaggregations.
Suitableforaginghabitatforlittlebrownbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsandotheraquatichabitatsintheprogramarea.Smallamountsofsuitableroostinghabitatmaybepresentintheprogramareaaswell.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsoflittlebrownbatroostsintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c);however,asinglelittlebrownbatfatalityhas
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐43
October 2014ICF 00323.08
beententativelyidentifiedintheprogramareaduringAPWRAfatalitysurveys(ICFInternational2013).
AsmallamountofsuitableroostinghabitatmaybepresentinthegoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.However,giventhecurrentlyknownelevationpreferencesandrangeforthisspeciesinCalifornia,itisunlikelythatanylocationintheAPWRAcontainshibernaculaorsignificantmaternityroostinghabitat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsoflittlebrownbatroostsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c);nevertheless,littlebrownbatsmayforageinorflythroughbothprojectareas.
Silver‐Haired Bat
Silver‐hairedbatisconsideredamoderatepriorityspeciesinCaliforniabytheWesternBatWorkingGroup(2007).Silver‐hairedbatsoccurprimarilyinthenorthernportionofCaliforniaandathigherelevationsinthesouthernandcoastalmountainranges(BrownandPierson1996)butmayoccuranywhereinCaliforniaduringtheirspringandfallmigrations.Theyareassociatedwithcoastalandmontaneconiferousforests,valleyfoothillwoodlands,pinyon‐juniperwoodlands,andvalleyfoothillandmontaneriparianhabitats(Zeineretal.1990b:54).Silver‐hairedbatsroostintreesalmostexclusivelyinthesummer,andmaternityrooststypicallyarelocatedinwoodpeckerhollowsoringapsunderbark.Maternalcoloniesrangefromseveraltoabout75individuals(BrownandPierson1996).
Suitableforaginghabitatforsilver‐hairedbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsandotheraquatichabitatsintheprogramarea.Treesintheprogramareamayprovidesuitableroostinghabitatforsilver‐hairedbat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofsilver‐hairedbatroostsintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Suitableforaginghabitatforsilver‐hairedbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.Treesintheprojectareasmayprovidesuitableroostinghabitatforsilver‐hairedbat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofsilver‐hairedbatroostsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Western Red Bat
WesternredbatisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcernandisconsideredahighpriorityspeciesinCaliforniabytheWesternBatWorkingGroup(2007).ItoccursthroughoutmuchofCaliforniaatlowerelevations.Itisfoundprimarilyinriparianandwoodedhabitatsbutalsooccursseasonallyinurbanareas(BrownandPierson1996).Westernredbatsroostinthefoliageoftreesthatareoftenlocatedontheedgeofhabitatsadjacenttostreams,fields,orurbanareas.ThisspeciesbreedsinAugustandSeptemberandyoungareborninMaythroughJuly(Zeineretal.1990b:60).
Suitableforaginghabitatforwesternredbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsandotheraquatichabitatsintheprogramarea.Treesandmixedwillowriparianscrubintheprogramareamayprovidesuitableroostinghabitatforwesternredbat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofwesternredbatroostsintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c);however,westernredbathasbeendocumentedintheprogramareaduringAPWRAfatalitysurveys(ICFInternational2013).
SuitableforaginghabitatforwesternredbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.Treesandmixedwillowriparianscrubintheproject
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐44
October 2014ICF 00323.08
areasmayprovidesuitableroostinghabitatforwesternredbat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofwesternredbatroostsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Hoary Bat
HoarybatisconsideredamoderatepriorityspeciesinCaliforniabytheWesternBatWorkingGroup(2007).HoarybatsoccurthroughoutCaliforniabutarethoughttohaveapatchydistributioninthesoutheasterndeserts(Zeineretal.1990b:62).Hoarybatsarefoundprimarilyinforestedhabitats,includingriparianforests,andmayoccurinparkandgardensettingsinurbanareas.Dayroostsitesareinthefoliageofconiferousanddeciduoustrees(BrownandPierson1996).Woodlandswithmediumtolargetreeswithdensefoliageprovidesuitablematernityroostsites(Zeineretal.1990b:62).Matingoccursinthefall,andafterdelayedfertilization,youngarebornMay–June(Zeineretal.1990b:62;BrownandPierson1996).
Suitableforaginghabitatforhoarybatsispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsandotheraquatichabitatsintheprogramarea.Treesandmixedwillowriparianscrubintheprogramareamayprovidesuitableroostinghabitatforhoarybat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofhoarybatroostsintheprogramarea;however,thereisonehistoricrecordofaroostnearLakedelValle,southwestoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Inaddition,hoarybathasbeendocumentedintheprogramareaduringAPWRAfatalitysurveys(ICFInternational2013)andinacousticsurveysattheVascoWindrepoweringsite(PandionSystems2010;Szewczak2013).
SuitableforagingandpotentiallysuitableroostinghabitatforhoarybatsispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.Treesandmixedwillowriparianscrubintheprojectareasmayprovidesuitableroostinghabitatforhoarybat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofhoarybatroostsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Townsend’s Big‐Eared Bat
Townsend’sbig‐earedbatisacandidatespeciesforlistingundertheCaliforniaEndangeredSpeciesAct,isaCaliforniastatespeciesofspecialconcern,andahighpriorityspeciesundertheWesternBatWorkingGroup’sconservationprioritymatrix(WesternBatWorkingGroup2007).Townsend’sbig‐earedbatoccursthroughoutCaliforniabutdistributionappearstobelimitedbytheavailabilityofcavern‐likerooststructures.Townsend’sbig‐earedbatshavebeenfoundinawidevarietyofhabitatsfromdeserttoriparianandcoastalwoodland,buttheyarefoundingreatestnumbersinareaswithcavern‐formingrockorabandonedmines(WesternBatWorkingGroup2005).Townsend’sbig‐earedbatsroostindome‐likespacesincavesormines,wheretheyroosthangingintheopenfromtheceiling.Theyhavealsobeenknowntousecavern‐likespacesinabandonedbuildingsorbridges,andinthebasalhollowsinlargecoastredwoodtrees(Mazurek2004:60).Matingoccursinfallandspring,andpupsareborninlatespringtoearlysummer(PiersonandRainey1998:2).Maternityroostsizevaries,andmaycontainonlyafeworuptoseveralhundredindividuals.Thespeciesisbelievedtoberelativelysedentary,hibernatingincavesandminesnearsummermaternityroosts,thoughseasonalmovementsarenotwellunderstood.Townsend’sbig‐earedbatsmayhavehibernatedhistoricallyinaggregationsofthousandsofindividuals(PiersonandRainey1998:1).Theyarehighlysensitivetoroostdisturbance.
SuitableforaginghabitatforTownsend’sbig‐earedbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsandotheraquatichabitatsintheprogramarea.Smallamountsofsuitableroostinghabitatmaybepresentintheprogramareaaswell.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofTownsend’sbig‐earedbat
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐45
October 2014ICF 00323.08
roostsintheprogramarea;howeverthereisonerecordofaroostsitesouthwestoftheprogramareanearLakedelValle(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
ItisunlikelythatsuitableroostinghabitatforTownsend’sbig‐earedbatispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas;however,Townsend’sbig‐earedbatsmayforageinorflythroughbothoftheseprojectareas.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofTownsend’sbigearedbatroostsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Pallid Bat
PallidbatisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcernandisconsideredahighpriorityspeciesinCaliforniabytheWesternBatWorkingGroup(2007).ItisfoundthroughoutmostofCaliforniaatlowtomiddleelevations(6,000feet).Pallidbatsarefoundinavarietyofhabitatsincludingdesert,brushyterrain,coniferousforest,andnon‐coniferouswoodlands.Daytimeroostsitesincluderockoutcrops,mines,caves,hollowtrees,buildings,andbridges.Nightroostsarecommonlyunderbridgesbutarealsoincavesandmines(BrownandPierson1996).HibernationmayoccurduringlateNovemberthroughMarch.PallidbatsbreedfromlateOctoberthroughFebruary(Zeineretal.1990b:70)andoneortwoyoungareborninMayorJune(BrownandPierson1996).
Suitableforaginghabitatforpallidbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsandotheraquatichabitatsintheprogramarea.Smallamountsofsuitableroostinghabitatmaybepresentintheprogramareaaswell.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofpallidbatroostsintheprogramarea;howevertherearetworecordsforoccurrencessouthwestoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
SuitableforaginghabitatforpallidbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.Treesintheprojectareasmayprovidesuitableroostinghabitatforpallidbat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofpallidbatroostsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
American Badger
AmericanbadgerisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern.InCalifornia,AmericanbadgersoccurthroughoutthestateexceptinhumidcoastalforestsofnorthwesternCaliforniainDelNorteandHumboldtCounties.Americanbadgersoccurinawidevarietyofopen,aridhabitatsbutmostcommonlyareassociatedwithgrasslands,savannas,andmountainmeadows.Theyrequiresufficientfood(burrowingrodents),friablesoils,andrelativelyopen,uncultivatedground.(Williams1986:66–67.)Badgersdigburrows,whichareusedforcoverandreproduction.Thespeciesmatesinsummerandearlyautumn,andyoungareborninMarchandearlyApril.(Zeineretal.1990b:312.)
SuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforAmericanbadgerispresentintheprogramarea.Thereareeightrecordsforoccurrencesofbadgersintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).TherearefouradditionalCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofAmericanbadgeroutsidebutneartheprogramarea.
SuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforAmericanbadgerispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.TherearetwoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofAmericanbadgerintheGoldenHillsprojectarea,andanadditionaloccurrencejustoutsideit(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforAmericanbadgerinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐46
October 2014ICF 00323.08
San Joaquin Kit Fox
TheSanJoaquinkitfoxisstate‐andfederallylistedasendangered.SanJoaquinkitfoxesoccurinsomeareasofsuitablehabitatontheflooroftheSanJoaquinValleyandinthesurroundingfoothillsoftheCoastRanges,SierraNevada,andTehachapiMountainsfromKernCountynorthtoContraCosta,Alameda,andSanJoaquinCounties(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1998).Since1998,thepopulationstructurehasbecomemorefragmented,withsomeresidentsatellitepopulationshavingbeenlocallyextirpated;thoseareashavebeenusedbydispersingkitfoxesratherthanresidentanimals(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2010:15).ThelargestextantpopulationsofkitfoxareinKernCounty(ElkHillsandBuenaVistaValley)andSanLuisObispoCountyintheCarrizoPlainNaturalArea(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1998).
NaturalhabitatsforSanJoaquinkitfoxincludealkalisink,alkaliflat,andgrasslands.SanJoaquinkitfoxesmayuseagriculturallandssuchasrowcrops,orchards,andvineyardstoalimitedextent,buttheyareunabletooccupyfarmlandonalong‐termbasis.(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2010:19–21.)SanJoaquinkitfoxesusuallypreferareaswithloose‐texturedsoilssuitablefordenexcavation(Orloffetal.1986:62)butarefoundonvirtuallyeverysoiltype(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1998:129).Wheresoilsmakediggingdifficult,kitfoxesmayenlargeormodifyburrowsbuiltbyotheranimals,particularlythoseofCaliforniagroundsquirrels(Orloffetal.1986:63;U.S.FishandWildlifeService1998:127).Structuressuchasculverts,abandonedpipelines,andwellcasingsmayalsobeusedasdensites(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1998:127).
ThebreedingseasonbeginsduringSeptemberandOctoberwhenadultfemalesbegintocleanandenlargenatalorpuppingdens.LittersoftwotosixpupsarebornbetweenlateFebruaryandlateMarch.(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1998:126.)
SuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxispresentintheprogramarea.Thereare11recordsforoccurrencesofSanJoaquinkitfoxintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Themajorityoftheoccurrencesareinthenorthandeasternportionsoftheprogramarea.Thereare15additionalCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofSanJoaquinkitfoxoutsidebutneartheprogramarea.
SuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.TherearethreeCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofSanJoaquinkitfoxintheGoldenHillsprojectareaandoneinthePattersonPassprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Birds and Bats Subject to Turbine‐Related Mortality
Inadditiontothespecial‐statuswildlifespeciesdiscussedabove,severalnon‐special‐statusspeciesofbirdsandbatsareconsideredinthisEIRbecauseoftheirpotentialtobekilledbyoperatingwindturbines.Batsareparticularlyvulnerablebecauseoftheirlowreproductiverateandsusceptibilitytoturbine‐relatedmortality.Pastandexistingturbine‐relatedavianandbatmortalityandmonitoringarediscussedbelowtoprovidecontextfortheturbine‐relatedavianandbatmortalityimpactdiscussions.
Avian Mortality and Monitoring
TheAPWRAsupportsabroaddiversityofresident,migratory,andwinteringbirdspeciesthatregularlymovethroughthearea(OrloffandFlannery1992).Inparticular,diurnalraptors(eagles
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐47
October 2014ICF 00323.08
andhawks)usetheprevailingwindsandupdraftsforsoaringandglidingduringdailytravel,foraging,andmigration.Birdspassingthroughtherotorplaneofoperatingwindturbinesareatriskofbeinginjuredorkilled.MultiplestudiesofavianmortalityintheAPWRAshowthatsubstantialnumbersofgoldeneagles,red‐tailedhawks,Americankestrels,burrowingowls,barnowls,andadiversemixofnon‐raptorspeciesarekilledeachyearinturbine‐relatedincidents(HowellandDiDonato1991;OrloffandFlannery1992;Howell1997;SmallwoodandThelander2004;ICFInternational2013).
Untilrecently,attemptstoreduceavianfatalitiesintheAPWRAhavefocusedprimarilyontwomanagementactions:theshutdownofturbinesduringthewinterperiodwhenuseoftheareabyred‐tailedhawks,goldeneagles,andAmericankestrelsishighest,andtheremovalofturbinesdeterminedtoposethehighestcollisionriskbasedonhistoryoffatalities,topographicpositionoftheturbine,andotherfactors(SmallwoodandSpiegel2005a,2005b,2005c;ICFInternational2013).Whiletheseactionshavemetwithsomesuccess,theireffectivenesshasbeenlessthanexpectedforreasonsthatarenotyetclear.However,anincreasingbodyofevidencesuggeststhatrepowering—inthiscasethereplacementofnumerousolder,smallerturbineswithfewernewer,largerturbines—couldresultinasubstantialreductioninavianfatalities.UsingthefirstfewyearsofdatafromtheAlamedaCountyAvianFatalityMonitoringProgram,SmallwoodandKaras(2009)concludedthatthemosteffectivewaytoreduceturbine‐relatedavianfatalitiesintheAPWRAistorepower.EvidencecollectedtodatefromthethreesitesintheAPWRAthathavebeenrepoweredsuggeststhatthelargermodernturbinescausesubstantiallyfewerturbine‐relatedavianfatalitiesthantheoldergenerationturbines(Brownetal.2013;ICFInternational2013),althoughitshouldbepointedoutthattwoofthethreesitesinvolvedhadmuchsmallerturbinesthanthoseproposedforuseintheprogram.TheScientificReviewCommittee(SRC)fortheAPWRAhasalsoproducedguidelinesforsitingwindturbinestoreduceavianfatalitiesintheAPWRA.TheSRCevaluatedtopographic,windpattern,birdbehavior,andturbinesitingvariablesrelatedtohazardousconditionstoprovideguidancetothewindcompaniestoreduceaviancollisionhazards(AlamedaCountyScientificReviewCommittee2010).
ThemonitoringprogramestablishedbytheSettlementAgreementdescribedinChapter1ofthisEIRandconductedbytheAlamedaCountyAFMThasresultedinconsiderableinformationonwhichtobaseconclusionsabouttheeffectsoftheAPWRA‐wideprogramandtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassrepoweringprojects.Themonitoringprogramhasbeenrunningcontinuouslysince2005,andannualestimatesofturbine‐relatedavianfatalityratesandestimatesofthetotalnumberofbirdskilledeachyearareavailableforeachbirdyearfrom2005through2011.AbirdyearstartsonOctober1andendsonSeptember30andisnamedforthecalendaryearinwhichitstarts.Birdyearsareusedasthebasisforanalysisbecausetheybetterreflectthetimingofavianmovementsandecologythandocalendaryears(ICFInternational2013).
Bat Fatality and Monitoring
TheAPWRAsupportshabitattypessuitableformaternity,foraging,andmigrationforspecial‐statusandcommonbats.Severalofthesespeciesaresusceptibletodirectmortalitythroughcollisionorotherinteractionswithwindturbines.FivespeciesofbathavebeendocumentedasfatalitiesintheAPWRA:littlebrownbat,Californiamyotis,westernredbat,hoarybat,andMexicanfree‐tailedbat(Table3.4‐6)(InsigniaEnvironmental2012:47–48;ICFInternational2013:3‐3).HoarybatsandMexicanfree‐tailedbatshavemadeupthemajorityofdocumentedfatalities;westernredbat,anothermigratoryspeciesandaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern,hassustainedthethirdhighestnumberofdocumentedfatalities.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐48
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Otherthanfatalityrecords,occurrencedataforbatspeciesintheAPWRAarelimited,andexpectationsofpresencearegenerallybasedonknownrangesandhabitatassociations.However,preliminaryanalysisofpre‐andpostconstructionacousticsurveydatafromtherecentlyrepoweredVascoWindsfacilityintheContraCostaCountyportionoftheAPWRAdocumentsthepresenceoffouradditionalspecies(bigbrownbat,silver‐hairedbat,canyonbat,andYumamyotis).Acousticsurveysindicatedbatactivityinallthreeseasonsinwhichsurveyswereconducted,withaspikeinactivityinthefall(PandionSystems2010;Szewczak2013).Mexicanfree‐tailedbatandhoarybatcomprisedthemajorityoftheacousticdetections(PandionSystems2010).
Relativelylittleisknownaboutbatbiologyasitrelatestofatalityriskatwindenergyfacilities.Limitedknowledgeofsuchfactorsasmigration,matingbehavior,behavioraroundturbines,andseasonalmovementsimpedeeffortstopredictriskofturbinecollision.StudiesatwindenergyfacilitiesinNorthAmericagenerallyshowstrongseasonalandspecies‐compositionpatternsinbatfatalities,withthebulkoffatalitiesconsistingofmigratoryspeciesandoccurringinlatesummertomid‐autumn.AsinotherpartsofNorthAmerica,themajorityofdocumentedfatalitiesintheAPWRAhaveoccurredduringthefallmigrationseasonandhaveconsistedofmigratorybatspecies.
Historically,thenumberofbatfatalitiesdetectedaspartoftheavianfatalitymonitoringprogramatold‐generationturbinesintheAPWRAhasbeenextremelylow,dueatleastinparttothemonitoringprogram’sdesign,whichhasfocusedonbirdmortality.Aspreviousstudymethodswerenotdesignedtogeneratedefensiblebatmortalityrates,andasnewgenerationturbinesmayposenovelthreatstobats,assumptionsofspeciesvulnerabilitybasedonextrapolationfromtheolderturbinetechnologiespresentintheAPWRAarenotnecessarilyvalid(CaliforniaBatWorkingGroup2006).
Calculatingadjustedbatfatalityratesatoldgenerationturbinesusingdatacollectedundertheearlyavianmonitoringprogramisproblematicbothbecausethesamplesizeislowandbecausemonitoringandanalysismethodswerenotdesignedtodetectandadjustforthesetypesoffatalities.Intheirpapergrapplingwithcomparisonsoffatalityratesbetweenold‐generationturbinesattheAPWRAandearlyrepoweringprojects,SmallwoodandKaras(2009)illustratedthesepointsbyacknowledgingthatalloftheirold‐generationbatfatalityestimatesarelikelybiasedlow(2009:1065)andthatdifferencesobservedincomparisonsofvariousbatfatalityestimates,eventhoseasseeminglysignificantas800%,couldnotbestatisticallydefendedduetothesmallsamplesizesinvolved(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1066–67).
Batfatalityratesavailableforold‐generationturbinesattheAPWRAareasfollows.Fortheearlieryears,covering1998–2002andacombinationofturbinemodels,nameplatecapacities,anddesigns,SmallwoodandKaraspresentedabatfatalityrateestimateof0.115(SE+‐0.073)batdeaths/MW/year(2009:1066).Formorerecentold‐generationturbinemonitoringyears(2005–2007),SmallwoodandKaraspresentedabatfatalityrateestimateof0.263(SE+_0.172)batdeaths/MW/year,(usedasthebaselineinthisPEIR)(2009:1066).
BatfatalityratesdocumentedatthethreerepoweredprojectsintheAPWRAvary.Theserateswerealsogeneratedusingdifferentsearcheffortsanddifferentadjustmentcalculations,makingdirectcomparisonproblematic,despitethecommonmetricreported.FortheDiabloWindsEnergyProject(2005–2007),SmallwoodandKaras(2009:1067)reportedabatfatalityrateestimateof0.783(SE+‐0.548)/MW/year;fortheBuenaVistaWindFarm(2008‐2010),InsigniaEnvironmental(2012:ES‐3)reportedabatfatalityraterangeof0.48–1.08/MW/year,dependingoncalculationmethods;forthefirstyearoftheVascoWindsrepoweringproject(2012–2013),Brownetal.(2013:35–36)reported
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐49
October 2014ICF 00323.08
abatfatalityraterangeof0.663(SE+‐0.486)to2.281(SE+‐1.06)/MW/year,withthe“bestestimate”ratereportedas1.679(SE+‐0.801)/MW/year(2013:39).
Consistentacrossalldocumentedrates,thoughmethodsusedtogeneratetheseratesvary,isthatreportedbatfatalityratesincreasedwhenold‐generationturbineswerereplacedbynewer,largerturbines(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1068).TurbinesusedinfuturerepoweringprojectsarelikelytobesimilarinsizetotheVascoWindsturbinesbutmuchlargerthantheDiabloWindsandBuenaVistaturbinesinbothoverallsizeandratednameplatecapacity.Inameta‐analysisofbatfatalitiesatnumerouswindenergyfacilitiesinNorthAmerica,Barclayetal.foundthatbatfatalityincreasedexponentiallywithincreasingturbineheight(2007:384).
ThelimiteddataavailablefortheprogramareaandvicinitysuggestthepotentialforsimilarspeciescompositionandtemporalpatternsofbatmortalitytothosethathavebeendocumentedattheVascoWindsrepoweringprojectandatotherfourth‐generationwindenergyfacilities,suchasthoseintheMontezumaHillsWindResourceArea.
Table 3.4‐6. Raw Bat Fatalities by Species Detected in Standardized Searches at Various APWRA Monitoring Projects
Species 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
APWRAMonitoringa
Hoarybat 0 2 1 0 2 0 5
Mexicanfree‐tailedbat 0 1 1 1 1 0 4
Westernredbat 0 1 1 1 0 0 3
Littlebrownbat 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
Unidentifiedbat 0 2 1 1 1 2 7
Totalbats 0 6 4 3 5 3 21
BuenaVistaRepoweringProjectb
Hoarybat 1 5 3 9
Mexicanfree‐tailedbat 0 1 2 3
Californiamyotis 0 0 1 1
Totalbats 1 6 6 13
VascoWindsRepoweringProject,YearOnec
Hoarybat 10
Mexicanfree‐tailedbat 7
Westernredbat 1
Unidentifiedbat 1
Totalbats 19
Sources:APWRA:ICFInternational2013:3‐3;BuenaVista:InsigniaEnvironmental2012:47‐8.Note:Fatalitiesareshownforallyearsforwhichmonitoringdataareavailable.a Variable:upto417MWinstalled,turbineheightsof60–164feet.b 38MWinstalled,turbineheightsof147–196feet.MonitoringresultsfromFebruary2008toJanuary2011.
c 78MWinstalled,turbineheightsof263feet.MonitoringresultsfromMay2012–May2013.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐50
October 2014ICF 00323.08
3.4.2 Environmental Impacts
Methods for Analysis
Thissectiondescribesthemethodsandassumptionsusedtodeterminethedirectandindirectimpactsoftheprogramandthetwospecificprojectsonbiologicalresources.Thegeneralmethodsforanalysisarefollowedbydiscussionsofthemethodsusedtoevaluateandquantifyavianandbatfatalityimpacts.Themethodsforanalysisofimpactsonbiologicalresourcesarebasedonprofessionalstandardsandinformationcitedthroughoutthissection.Thekeyeffectswereidentifiedandevaluatedbasedontheenvironmentalcharacteristicsoftheprogramandprojectareasandtheexpectedmagnitude,intensity,anddurationofactivitiesrelatedtotheconstructionandoperationoftheprogramandthePattersonPassandGoldenHillsprojects.
Directimpactsarethoseeffectsthataredirectlycausedbyprojectconstructionandoperation(eveniftheresultingeffectbecomesapparentovertime).Indirectimpactsarethoseeffectsofaprojectthatoccureitherlaterintimeoratadistancefromtheprojectlocationbutarereasonablyforeseeable,suchasconversionofwetlandstouplandsfromdiversionofupstreamwatersources.Directandindirectimpactscanbeeitherpermanentortemporary.Impactsonlandcoveraregenerallyconsideredtemporarywhenthelandcoverisrestoredtopreconstructionconditionswithin1year.
Theactivitieslistedbelowcouldhavedirecteffectsonbiologicalresources.
Vegetationclearing;grading;excavating/trenching;andconstructionofcranepads,turbinefoundations,andbatchplants.
Constructionofnewdirtorgravelroadsandwideningofexistingroads.
Temporarystockpilingandsidecastingofsoil,constructionmaterials,orotherconstructionwastes.
Soilcompaction,dust,andwaterrunofffromconstructionsites.
Increasedvehicletraffic.
Short‐termconstruction‐relatednoise(fromequipment)andvisualdisturbance.
Degradationofwaterqualityindrainagesandotherwaterbodiesresultingfromconstructionrunoffcontainingpetroleumproducts.
Introductionorspreadofinvasiveplantspecies.
Operationofwindturbines.
Reclamationoflandscape.
Maintenanceoffirebreaksandroads.
Theconditionslistedbelowareexamplesofindirecteffectsonbiologicalresources.
Permanentalterationstolightandnoiselevels.
Damagethroughtoxicityassociatedwithherbicidesandrodenticides.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐51
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Mostofthebiologicalimpactsassociatedwithrepoweringactivitiesanalyzedinthissectionaredirectimpacts.Whereindirectimpactswouldresultfromsuchactivities,theyaresoidentifiedintheimpactdiscussion.
Permanentdirecteffectsonbiologicalresourceswerequantifiedusingtheestimatedamountoflandcoverthatwouldbeconvertedasaresultofconstructionofnewfacilities.Temporaryeffectsonbiologicalresourceswerequantifiedusingtheestimatedamountoflandcoverthatwouldbetemporarilydisturbedduringprojectconstructionbutwouldberestoredtopreprojectconditionswithin1yearofdisturbance.
Fortheprogram,specificlocationsoffacilitiesandroadsarenotavailable.Toestimatepermanentandtemporaryimpactacreagesintheprogramarea,impactinformationderivedfromtheGoldenHillsprojectdescriptionwasusedtocalculateaveragepermanentandtemporaryareasofdisturbanceforan80MWprojectusingturbinessimilartothoseproposedfortheprogram.Thesestandardizedareasofimpactwereappliedtothespecificationsoftheprogram(seeChapter2,ProgramDescription).Thetotalamountsofpermanentandtemporaryimpactswerethenallocatedtothevariouslandcovertypesbasedontheproportionoftheprogramareacomprisingeachlandcovertype.Accordingly,theestimatedpermanentandtemporarylandcoverimpactsareproportionaltotheamountofeachlandcovertypeintheprogramarea.TheseestimatedimpactsareshowninTable3.4‐7.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐52
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.4‐7. Estimated Permanent and Temporary Impacts on Land Cover Types in the Program Areaa
LandCoverType
AmountinProgramArea(acres)
PercentofTotalProgramArea
PermanentImpactEstimate(acres)b
TemporaryImpactEstimate(acres)c
Alt1 Alt2 Alt1 Alt2
Annualgrassland 39,381.63 90.83 598.57 645.80 526.81 568.60
Alkalimeadow 555.06 1.28 8.44 9.10 7.42 8.01
Rockoutcrop 42.05 0.001 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Northernmixedchaparral/chamisechaparral
28.65 0.0007 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Northerncoastalscrub/Diablansagescrub
74.51 0.002 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Mixedevergreenforest/oakwoodland
582.18 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06
Blueoakwoodland 163.61 0.004 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03
Foothillpine–oakwoodland 21.11 0.0005 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mixedwillowriparianscrub 39.27 0.0009 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Mixedriparianforestandwoodland
9.93 0.0002 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Alkaliwetland 483.17 1.11 7.31 7.89 6.44 6.95
Seasonalwetland 81.44 0.002 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Perennialfreshwatermarsh 0.01 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Canal/Aqueduct 158.21 0.004 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03
Ponds 54.19 0.001 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Reservoirs 176.58 0.004 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03
Drainagesd – – – – – –
Cropland 4.55 0.0001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
DevelopedandDisturbed 1,502.58 0.03 0.20 0.21 0.17 0.19
a Theseimpactestimatesdonotincludeoffsetoflandcoverthatisreturnedtonaturalconditionsfromremovaloffacilitiesandroads.Therefore,acreagesofimpactsarelikelytobelowerthanthoseshownhere.
b Percentoftotalprogramareamultipliedby659acres(Alternative1)and711acres(Alternative2)oftotalpermanentimpactsassociatedwiththeprogram.
c Percentoftotalprogramareamultipliedby580acres(Alternative1)and626acres(Alternative2)oftotaltemporaryimpactsassociatedwiththeprogram.
d Acreagewasnotcalculatedforimpactsondrainages.Typically,suchimpactsaremeasuredinlinearfeet;theseimpactswillbequantifiedwhendesigndrawingsareavailable.
Itshouldbenotedthatsitingconsiderationsduringdesignanddevelopmentofindividualprojectsandimplementationofavoidanceandminimizationmeasureswouldlikelymodifysuchimpacts.Forexample,becausemostroadsandfacilitieswouldnotbeconstructedinlowareaswheremostpondsandwetlandsarelocated,permanentlossoftheselandcovertypesisnotanticipated.Additionally,impactestimatesdonottakeintoaccountthatsomedevelopedareasmaybereturnedtonatural
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐53
October 2014ICF 00323.08
conditions;suchrestorationwouldoffsettheacreagesofaffectedlandcover.Consequently,theestimatesinTable3.4‐7likelyexceedtheactualimpactsthatwouldresultfromconstruction.
LandcoverimpactsassociatedwiththeGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsweredeterminedbyoverlayingthefootprintoftheproposedprojectcomponentsonthemappedlandcovertypesandcalculatingtheareaofeachlandcovertypethatwouldbepermanentlyandtemporarilyaffected.Permanentandtemporaryimpactsonlandcover(andspecial‐statusspecieshabitat)resultingfromtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareshowninTables3.4‐8and3.4‐9,respectively.
Table 3.4‐8. Estimated Permanent and Temporary Impacts on Land Cover Types in the Golden Hills Project Area (acres)a
LandCover Permanent
Temporary
AssociatedWildlifeSpeciesConstruction Decommissioning
Annualgrassland
124.89 91.80 28.47(existingturbines)117.00(roads)
Californiatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,westernpondturtle,Blainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,SanJoaquincoachwhip,white‐tailedkite,northernharrier,Swainson’shawk,goldeneagle,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike,tricoloredblackbird,Americanbadger,SanJoaquinkitfox,non–special‐specialstatusmigratorybirds
Alkalimeadow 0.30 3.69 – Sameasannualgrassland
Ponds 0.15 0.00 – Vernalpooltadpoleshrimp,curved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle,Californiatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,westernpondturtle
Drainagesb – – Curved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle,Californiatigersalamander,Californiared‐leggedfrog,foothillyellow‐leggedfrog,westernpondturtle
a Theseimpactestimatesdonotincludeoffsetoflandcoverthatisreturnedtonaturalconditionsfromremovaloffacilitiesandroads.Therefore,acreagesofimpactsarelikelytobelowerthanthoseshownhere.
b Acreagewasnotcalculatedforimpactsondrainages.Typically,suchimpactsaremeasuredinlinearfeet;theseimpactswillbequantifiedwhendesigndrawingsareavailable.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐54
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.4‐9. Permanent and Temporary Impacts (acres) on Land Cover Types in the Patterson Pass Project Area (acres)a
LandCover Permanent
Temporary
AssociatedWildlifeSpeciesConstruction Decommissioning
Annualgrassland
15.59 56.38 12.34(existingturbines)66.00(roads)
Californiatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,westernpondturtle,Blainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,SanJoaquincoachwhip,white‐tailedkite,northernharrier,Swainson’shawk,goldeneagle,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike,tricoloredblackbird,Americanbadger,SanJoaquinkitfox,non–special‐specialstatusmigratorybirds
SeasonalWetland
– 0.01 – Longhornfairyshrimp,vernalpoolfairyshrimp,vernalpooltadpoleshrimp,curved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle,westernspadefoot
Perennialfreshwatermarsh
– 0.02 – Californiatigersalamander,Californiared‐leggedfrog,westernpondturtle
Drainages 0.01 0.03 – Curved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle,Californiatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,foothillyellow‐leggedfrog,westernpondturtle
a Theseimpactestimatesdonotincludeoffsetoflandcoverthatisreturnedtonaturalconditionsfromremovaloffacilitiesandroads.Therefore,acreagesofimpactsarelikelytobelowerthanthoseshownhere.
Potentialindirectimpactsresultingfromtheprogramandthetwoprojectswereevaluatedqualitativelyfortworeasons:(1)indirectimpactswouldoccurfartherfromtheprojectareaorlaterintime,and(2)evaluatingindirecteffectsquantitativelywouldbehighlyspeculative.
Avian Fatality Analysis Methods
Fatality Rates
Estimatingthenumberofbirdskilledatwindenergyfacilitiesisarapidlydevelopingfield,withavarietyofmetrics,methods,andestimatorsusedtoquantifyturbine‐relatedavianfatalities.Mostcommonlyusedestimatorsfirstcalculatetherateatwhichbirdsarekilled.Historically,themostcommonlyusedratehasbeenthenumberofbirdskilledpermegawatt(MW)peryear,whereMWsaremeasuredastheratednameplatecapacitiesoftheturbines.Theratednameplatecapacityofaturbineistheamountofpoweritcangenerateunderitsidealconditions(differentturbinesaredesignedtooperatemostefficientlyunderdifferentconditions).
ThenumberoffatalitiesperMWperyearhasbeenusedmostoftenbecauseitfacilitatescomparisonsacrossanumberofdifferentturbinetypeswithdifferentsizesandratednameplatecapacities.However,thenumberofbirdskilledperturbineperyearisbeingusedmoreoftenatfacilitiesusingmodernturbinesbecausetheselargerturbinesarereachingasizeatwhichahigher
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐55
October 2014ICF 00323.08
densityofturbinesisnolongerfeasible.Consequently,thenumberoftowersbecomesrelativelymoreimportantthantheactualratedcapacity.
Regardlessofthemetricused,thefatalityrate(expressedeitherperMWorperturbine)isthenmultipliedbyeitherthetotalnumberofMWsinthefacilityorthetotalnumberofturbinesinthefacility,respectively,toobtaintheestimateofthetotalnumberofbirdskilledeachyearatthefacility.
ThebaselineestimateofthenumberofbirdskilledannuallyforeachprojectandfortheprogramareawasbasedonthetotalnumberofMWsthatwereinstalled(referredtoasthetotalinstalledcapacity)atthetimetheNoticeofPreparationforthisPEIRwasfiled.TheinstalledcapacityatthetimetheNOPwasfiledwas329MWfortheprogramarea,80.5MWfortheGoldenHillsprojectarea,and21.8MWforthePattersonPassprojectarea(theprogramareatotalincludesthecapacityofthetwoprojectareas).
Forthefatalityrates,theaverageoftheannualestimatesofeachfatalityratefromthe2005–2011birdyears(n=7years)providedbytheAlamedaCountyAvianFatalityMonitoringProgram(ICFInternational2013)wasbasedonold‐generationturbinesonly(i.e.,resultsfromtheDiabloWindsandBuenaVistaturbineswereexcludedbecausetheyarenotconsideredold‐generationturbines).Thisaveragewasusedbecausetheannualfatalityratesvaryconsiderablyfromyeartoyear.
Theanalysiswasbasedonfivegroupsofspecies:focalspecies,speciesoflocalconservationconcern,raptors(includingowlsandturkeyvultures),non‐raptors,andallbirds.Focalspeciesweredefinedinthe2007SettlementAgreementasAmericankestrel,burrowingowl,goldeneagle,andred‐tailedhawkforthepurposeofmeasuringthereductioninraptorfatalitiesresultingfromimplementationofmanagementactions.Fouradditionalspecies(loggerheadshrike[Californiaspeciesofspecialconcern],prairiefalcon[CDFWWatchList],Swainson’shawk[listedasthreatenedunderCESA],andbarnowl)wereaddedfortheanalysesinthisPEIRbecauseofahighfatalityrate,generalconcernsabouttheconservationstatusofthesespecies,orboth.
ICFbiologistscomparedthebaselinenumberoffatalitiesforeachspeciesandspeciesgroupcalculatedasoutlinedabovetothenumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurasaresultofrepowering.Thenumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurasaresultofrepoweringwasbasedonthe417and450MWcapsforthetwoprogramalternativesandonthesizeofeachoftheprojectsmeasuredinMWsasoutlinedintheprojectdescription.TheratesusedtocalculatethenumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurasaresultofrepoweringwerederivedfromtheratesatthreerepoweringprojectsintheAPWRAthatusenewer,repoweredturbines:DiabloWinds,BuenaVista,andVascoWinds.DiabloWindscomprisesthirty‐one660kWturbines,BuenaVistathirty‐eight1MWturbines,andVascoWindsthirty‐four2.3MWturbines(InsigniaEnvironmental2012;Brownetal.2013;ICFInternational2013).Althoughthereisconsiderablerangeinturbinesizesamongthesethreeprojects,theyareallconsiderednew‐generationturbinesrelativetotherestoftheturbinesinstalledintheAPWRA.Theannualfatalityrates(expressedasfatalitiesperMWperyear)forthesethreerepoweringprojectsarepresentedinTable3.4‐10,alongwiththeaverageoftheannualfatalityratesatnonrepoweredturbinesforcomparison.However,itshouldbenotedthattherateestimatesavailablefromnew‐generationrepoweredturbinesintheAPWRAmaynotberepresentativeofratesthatwouldoccuratotherlocationsintheAPWRA.Thisisbecausethethreeexistingrepoweredprojectsiteseachhavedifferentturbinetypesandarelocatedinthreerelativelysmall,distinctareaswithsite‐specificgeographic,topographic,andotherecologicalconditions,andbecausetheprimaryspeciesofconcernarenotevenlydistributedthroughouttheAPWRA.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐56
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.4‐10. Annual Adjusted Fatality Rates for Nonrepowered and Repowered APWRA Turbines
Species/Group Nonrepowereda
Repowered
DiabloWindsb BuenaVistac VascoWindsd
Americankestrel 0.59 0.09 0.15 0.30
Barnowl 0.24 0.02 0.00 0.03
Burrowingowl 0.78 0.84 – 0.05
Goldeneagle 0.08 0.01 0.04 0.03e
Loggerheadshrike 0.19 0.00 – –
Prairiefalcon 0.02 – 0.00 –
Red‐tailedhawk 0.44 0.20 0.10 0.25
Swainson’shawk 0.00 – – –
Allraptors 2.43 1.21 0.31 0.64
Allnativenon‐raptors 4.50 2.51 1.01 2.09
Notes: fatalityratesreflectannualfatalitiesperMW.“–”denotesthatnofatalitiesweredetected.“0.00”signifiesthat,althoughfatalitiesweredetected,therateislowerthantwosignificantdigits.
a Averageof2005–2011birdyears.b Averageof2005–2009birdyears.c Averageof3years(2007–2009).d Valuesfromfirstyearofmonitoring(2013).e ValueupdatedbasedoninformationprovidedbyNextEraEnergyResourcesonJuly21,2014.Valueprovidedisanaverageoftheadjustedratesfrommonitoringyears1(0.016)and2(0.048).
Potential Biases in the Avian Fatality Analysis Methods
Severalfactorsconfoundthecomparisonofavianfatalityratesbetweenold‐andnew‐generationturbines.Thefatalityratesfromnonrepoweredturbineswereobtainedwhilemanagementactionswerebeingimplementedtoreduceavianfatalities.Theseactionsincludedtheshutdownofturbinesduringthewinterperiod,atimewhenwindsarelowestbutavianuseoftheareaishighestforthreeofthefourfocalspecies.Inaddition,hazardousturbineswerebeingremovedduringtheperiodofdatacollection.Theseactionsincombinationresultedinareductionofavianfatalityrates,tendingtounderestimatethedifferencesbetweenold‐generationturbinesandnewerturbinesbecausethenewerturbinesarenotshutdownduringthewinterperiodandnoneweredeemedhazardousenoughtowarrantremoval.
Thefatalityratesfromtwoofthethreerepoweredprojectsareassociatedwithturbinesconsiderablysmallerthanthoselikelytobeusedinallfuturerepoweringprojects.Evidencecollectedtodatesuggeststhatavianfatalityratesmaydecreaseasturbinesizeincreases(SmallwoodandKaras2009).Consequently,theseratesmaybebiasedhighrelativetotheturbineslikelytobeusedinthetwoprojectsdescribedinthisPEIRandfutureprojectsimplementedintherestoftheAPWRA.Inaddition,thereisconsiderablevariationincollisionriskacrossthevarioustopographiesandgeographiesoftheAPWRA,presumablydueinparttovariationsinabundanceanduseoftheseareasbydifferentspecies.Forexample,burrowingowlswereknowntobeabundantintheareaaroundtheDiabloWindsturbineswhentheywereinstalled,andthusthereisarelativelyhighrate(fornew‐generationturbines)offatalitiesattheseturbines.Conversely,noburrowingowlfatalitiesweredetectedintheBuenaVistaprojectareainthe3yearsoffatalitymonitoringafterrepowering.Thus,thefatalityratesatthethreerepoweredprojectsitesmaynotbe
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐57
October 2014ICF 00323.08
representativeofthefatalityrateslikelytooccuratotherrepoweringprojectsites.Becauseofthevariationbetweentheseprojects,fatalityratesfromallthreeprojectswereusedtoprovidearangeintheestimatesoftotalannualfatalitieslikelytooccurasaresultofrepowering.
Finally,oneofthebiggestdifferencesamongallstudiesisvariationindetectionprobability.Detectionprobabilityasitisusedherereferstotheprobabilitythataturbine‐relatedfatalityisactuallydetected.Therearevariouswaysofmeasuringdetectionprobability,themostcommonbeingtheuseofcarcassplacementtrialstomeasuretherateatwhichcarcassesareremovedfromthesearchareaandtherateatwhichsearchersdetectcarcassesgiventhattheyarestillpresent.Detectionprobabilityvariesamongsearchers,habitattypes,seasons,years,andmanyotherfactors.TheAlamedaCountyAvianFatalityMonitoringProgrammeasureddetectionprobabilitiesinonlyoneyear,andtheseprobabilitieswereusedtoestimatethenumberofkilledbirdsinallyearsofthestudy.Ifdetectionprobabilityvariesconsiderablyacrossyears,suchvariationcanalsoconfoundtoanunknowndegreecomparisonsoffatalityratesandestimatesoftotalfatalitiesacrossprojects.
Differencesinsearchradiusmayconstituteanadditionalbiasaffectingtheanalysis.Thereissomedebateinthescientificcommunityregardingtheappropriatesearchradii;consequently,fatalityratesfornew‐generationturbinesmayhaveapotentialandasyetunknownbias.
Bat Fatality Analysis Methods
Fatality Rates
TheassessmentofbatspeciespotentiallyatriskisbasedonareviewofexistingbatfatalitydatafortheAPWRA,speciesoccurrencedatainandaroundtheprogramandprojectareas,thecurrentunderstandingofthosespecies’susceptibilitytofourth‐generationturbine–relatedmortality,andknowntrendsinbatfatalitiesatwindenergyfacilitiesingeneral.
Methodsusedtoconducttheanalysisweresimilartothoseusedtoassessthepotentialimpactsonavianspecies.ThetotalinstalledcapacityatthetimetheNOPforthisPEIRwasfiledwasusedtoestimatethebaselinenumberoffatalitiesthatwouldoccuriftheold‐generationturbinesweretocontinueoperatingwithoutanyrepowering.ThisvaluewasmultipliedbythefatalityrateforbatsprovidedbySmallwoodandKaras(2009:1066)usingdatafromtheAFMTforthe2005–2007birdyearstoobtainestimatesoftotalbatfatalitiesperyearfortheprogramandthetwoprojects.Thesenumberswerecomparedtothenumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurifold‐generationturbineswerereplacedwithnewer,modernturbines.Thenumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurasaresultofrepoweringwasbasedonthe417MWcapfortheprogramareaandthesizeofeachoftheprojectsmeasuredinMWsasoutlinedintheprojectdescription.
Estimatesofbatfatalityratesfromseveralsourceswereusedtoprovidearangeofbatfatalityestimatesthatcouldoccurasaresultofrepowering.Theprimarysource,VascoWinds,wassupplementedwithbatfatalityrateestimatesfromthetwootherrepoweringprojectsintheAPWRA—DiabloWindsandBuenaVista—bothofwhichusedturbinessmallerthanthoseusedincurrentandfuturerepoweringprojects.BatfatalityratesfromthenearbyMontezumaHillsWindResourceAreawerealsousedbecausethisisthenearestarea—beyondVascoWinds—wherefourth‐generationturbinesareinoperation.Theresultantrangeofpossiblefatalityrateswascomparedtothebaselineestimatesoftotalfatalitiesforthetwoprojectareasandtheprogramarea.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐58
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Potential Biases in the Bat Fatality Analysis Methods
Althoughthebestavailableevidencewasusedtoestimatethenumberofbatfatalitiespotentiallyresultingfromimplementationoftheproposedprogramandprojects,thereismoreuncertaintyintheseestimatesthanthereisforbirdfatalityestimates.BecausetheAlamedaCountyAvianFatalityProgramwasnotdesignedtocountbats,thebaselinefatalityrateislikelyunderestimated.Moreover,becauseVascoWindsisnotrepresentativeoftheentireprogramarea,extrapolationofresultsfromthissitetootherareasshouldbeinterpretedwithcaution.Finally,thenearbyMontezumaHillsWindResourceArea,whilesharingsomelandusecharacteristics(e.g.,grazing),supportsmoredrylandfarmingthantheAPWRAandhasadifferenttopographicalprofile.
Determination of Significance
Thebasisfordeterminingwhenagivenimpactexceedsthethresholdofsignificance—thatis,whenithasasubstantialadverseeffect—wasdeterminedbytheprofessionaljudgmentofqualifiedbiologists.Underlong‐establishedCEQApracticeandprinciple,suchdeterminationsarederivedfromcomparisonwiththebaselineofexistingconditions,asthefocusofCEQAison“substantialadverseeffect”asachangefromexistingconditions.Theanalysisofimpactsonbiologicalresources,andinparticularonavianspeciesintheprogramarea,accordingly,entailedthecomparisonoftheexistingconditionofregularandmoreorlesspredictablelevelsofavianmortalityassociatedwiththeexistingwindturbines—thebaselinemortalityratedefinedaboveinAvianFatalityAnalysisMethods—withtheanticipatedorcalculatedprojectionofthemortalityratethatwouldresultfromimplementationoftheprogramorprojects.Wheretheprojectedratewouldexceedthebaselinerate,theimpactwouldtypicallybesignificant;iftheprojectedrateisbelowthebaselinerate,theimpactwouldtypicallybeconsideredlessthansignificant.TheCountyconsideredseveralissuesinvolvinguseofthetypicaldeterminationofsignificanceoutlinedabove.
Thebaselineconditionisonethatalreadyresultsinasubstantialnumberofavianfatalities,whichinitselfconstitutesasignificantimpact.
Avianmortalityconsistsofaseriesoftemporal,moment‐to‐momentevents;accordingly,itcannotbeviewedasaconstantinthewaythatotherbaselineenvironmentalconditions,suchaspresenceofexistinghabitatareas,landscapefeatures,oranearthquakefault,canbeviewed.
Estimationoffatalityratesfromexistingandnew‐generationturbinesis,asdiscussedintheimpactanalysis,variableanduncertain.
Adeterminationofsignificancewouldbeappropriateifwindturbineoperationscouldviolatespecificlawsandregulations(e.g.,ESA,CESA,MBTA)thatarenottiedtomortalityrates.
Commitmentswereagreedtobythemajorityofthewindoperators,documentedinthe2007SettlementAgreement,toachievea50%reductioninavianfatalitiesofannualfatalitiesoffourfocalspecies(goldeneagle,burrowingowl,Americankestrel,andred‐tailedhawk)throughimplementationoftheAvianWildlifeProtectionProgramandSchedule(AWPPS)asestablishedin2005andmodifiedin2007.
Accordingly,inviewoftheforegoingconsiderations,thefactthatevenreducedavianfatalitiescouldviolatespecificlawsandregulations,andtheconservationapproachdescribedinthe2007SettlementAgreement,theCountyhasdeterminedthatthethresholdofsignificanceforimpactsonavianspeciesiseffectivelyanylevelofavianmortalityabovezero.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐59
October 2014ICF 00323.08
InaccordancewithAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelines,theprogramalternativesandthePattersonPassandGoldenHillsprojectswouldbeconsideredtohaveasignificanteffectiftheprogramorprojectwouldresultinanyoftheconditionslistedbelow.
Haveasubstantialadverseeffect,eitherdirectlyorthroughhabitatmodifications,onanyspeciesidentifiedasacandidate,sensitive,orspecial‐statusspeciesinlocalorregionalplans,policies,orregulations,orbytheCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlifeorU.S.FishandWildlifeService.
Haveasubstantialadverseeffectonanyriparianhabitatorothersensitivenaturalcommunityidentifiedinlocalorregionalplans,policies,orregulations,orbytheCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlifeorU.S.FishandWildlifeService.
HaveasubstantialadverseeffectonfederallyprotectedwetlandsasdefinedbySection404oftheCleanWaterAct(including,butnotlimitedto,marshes,vernalpools,coastalwetlands,etc.)throughdirectremoval,filling,hydrologicalinterruption,orothermeans.
Interferesubstantiallywiththemovementofanynativeresidentormigratoryfishorwildlifespeciesorwithestablishednativeresidentormigratorywildlifecorridors,orimpedetheuseofnativewildlifenurserysites.
Substantiallyreducethehabitatofacommonplantorwildlifespecies,causeaplantorwildlifepopulationtodropbelowself‐sustaininglevels,orthreatentoeliminateaplantoranimalcommunity.
Conflictwithanylocalpoliciesorordinancesprotectingbiologicalresources,suchasatreepreservationpolicyorordinance.
ConflictwiththeprovisionsofanadoptedHCP,NCCP,orotherapprovedlocal,regional,orstatehabitatconservationplan.
Impacts and Mitigation Measures
ThefollowingdiscussionassessespotentialimpactsonbiologicalresourcesresultingfromimplementationoftheprogramandtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojects.Wildlifespecieswithsimilarhabitatuse(e.g.,tree‐nestingspecies)weregroupedintheimpactdiscussionsbelow.
MitigationmeasuresforpotentialimpactsoftheprogramandPattersonPassandGoldenHillsprojectsweredevelopedtobeconsistentwiththeavoidance,minimization,andmitigationmeasuressetforthintheEastAlamedaCountyConservationStrategy(EACCSorConservationStrategy).TheConservationStrategywasdevelopedtoassistwithenvironmentalcompliancerequirementsofESA,CESA,CEQA,NEPA,andotherapplicablelawsforallprojectswithintheareacoveredbythestrategythatwouldhaveimpactsonbiologicalresources.TheConservationStrategyestablishesgoalsandobjectivesandacompensationprogramtooffsetimpactsfromprojectsinthecoveredarea.TheprogramarealieswithintheareacoveredbytheConservationStrategy.Whereapplicable,thegoalsandobjectivesintheConservationStrategywereusedtodevelopmitigationmeasurestominimizepotentialimpactsresultingfromtheprogramandtheindividualprojectsaddressedinthisEIR.Likewise,compensatorymitigationfortheprogramandindividualprojectsreferstomitigationratiosfromtheConservationStrategy.IntheeventthattakeauthorizationisobtainedforanyspecieslistedunderESA,CESA,orBGEPA,avoidance,minimization,andcompensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewiththeauthorizationinconsultationwithUSFWSand/orCDFW.ImplementationofstateandfederalrequirementscontainedinsuchauthorizationwillconstitutecompliancewithcorrespondingmeasuresinthisPEIR.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐60
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactBIO‐1a‐1:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsorhabitatoccupiedbyspecial‐statusplants—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Ground‐disturbingactivitiesassociatedwithAlternative1couldresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsortheirhabitat.Directeffectsincludethoseeffectswhereplantsmayberemoved,damaged,orcrushed(seedlings)byground‐disturbingactivities,themovementorparkingofvehicles,and/ortheplacementofequipmentandsupplies.Grounddisturbancecankillordamagematureindividualsoreliminatetheirhabitat.Excavationalterssoilpropertiesandmaycreateconditionsunsuitableforthegrowthofsomespeciesorfavortheirreplacementbyotherspecies.Therootsofshrubsandotherperennialspeciesaresusceptibletodamagefromsoilcompactionbyequipmentorconstructionmaterials.Possibleindirecteffectsonplantscouldresultfromerosionthatdegradeshabitatoraccidentalignitionofafirethatdamagesorkillsindividuals.Becausetheseground‐disturbingactivitiescouldhavesubstantialadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantspecies,thisimpactissignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1ewouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1a:Conductsurveystodeterminethepresenceorabsenceofspecial‐statusplantspecies
Projectproponentswillconductsurveysforthespecial‐statusplantspecieswithinandadjacenttoallprojectsites.Allsurveyswillbeconductedbyqualifiedbiologistsinaccordancewiththeappropriateprotocols.
Special‐statusplantsurveyswillbeconductedinaccordancewithProtocolsforSurveyingandEvaluatingImpactstoSpecialStatusNativePlantPopulationsandNaturalCommunities(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2009)duringtheseasonthatspecial‐statusplantspecieswouldbeevidentandidentifiable—i.e.,duringtheirbloomingseason.Nomorethan3yearspriortoground‐disturbingrepoweringactivitiesandduringtheappropriateidentificationperiodsforspecial‐statusplants(Table3.4‐4),aqualifiedbiologist(asdeterminedbyAlamedaCounty)willconductfieldsurveyswithindecommissioningworkareas,proposedconstructionareas,andtheimmediatelyadjacentareastodeterminethepresenceofhabitatforspecial‐statusplantspecies.TheprojectproponentwillsubmitareportdocumentingthesurveyresultstoAlamedaCountyforreviewandapprovalpriortoconductinganyrepoweringactivities.Thereportwillincludethelocationanddescriptionofallproposedworkareas,thelocationanddescriptionofallsuitablehabitatforspecial‐statusplantspecies,andthelocationanddescriptionofothersensitivehabitats(e.g.,vernalpools,wetlands,riparianareas).Additionally,thereportwilloutlinewhereadditionalspeciesand/orhabitat‐specificmitigationmeasuresarerequired.Thisreportwillprovidethebasisforanyapplicablepermitapplicationswhereincidentaltakeoflistedspeciesmayoccur.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
ProjectproponentswillensurethatthefollowingBMPs,inaccordancewithpracticesestablishedintheEACCS,willbeincorporatedintoindividualprojectdesignandconstructiondocuments.
Employeesandcontractorsperformingdecommissioningandreclamationactivitieswillreceiveenvironmentalsensitivitytraining.Trainingwillincludereviewofenvironmental
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐61
October 2014ICF 00323.08
laws,mitigationmeasures,permitconditions,andotherrequirementsthatmustbefollowedbyallpersonneltoreduceoravoideffectsonspecial‐statusspeciesduringconstructionactivities.
Environmentaltailboardtrainingswilltakeplaceonanas‐neededbasisinthefield.Thesetrainingswillincludeabriefreviewofthebiologyofthecoveredspeciesandguidelinesthatmustbefollowedbyallpersonneltoreduceoravoidnegativeeffectsonthesespeciesduringdecommissioningandreclamationactivities.Directors,managers,superintendents,andthecrewleaderswillberesponsibleforensuringthatcrewmemberscomplywiththeguidelines.
Vehiclesandequipmentwillbeparkedonpavement,existingroads,andpreviouslydisturbedareastotheextentpracticable.
Offroadvehicletravelwillbeavoided.
Materialwillbestockpiledonlyinareasthatdonotsupportspecial‐statusspeciesorsensitivehabitats.
Gradingwillberestrictedtotheminimumareanecessary.
Priortoground‐disturbingactivitiesinsensitivehabitats,projectconstructionboundariesandaccessareaswillbeflaggedandtemporarilyfencedduringconstructiontoreducethepotentialforvehiclesandequipmenttostrayintoadjacenthabitats.
Vehiclesorequipmentwillnotberefueledwithin100feetofawetland,stream,orotherwaterwayunlessabermedandlinedrefuelingarea(i.e.,acreatedbermmadeofsandbagsorotherremovablematerial)isconstructed.
Erosioncontrolmeasureswillbeimplementedtoreducesedimentationinnearbyaquatichabitatwhenactivitiesarethesourceofpotentialerosion.Plasticmonofilamentnetting(erosioncontrolmatting)orsimilarmaterialcontainingnettingwillnotbeusedattheproject.Acceptablesubstitutesincludecoconutcoirmattingortackifiedhydroseedingcompounds.
Significantearthmoving‐activitieswillnotbeconductedinriparianareaswithin24hoursofpredictedstormsoraftermajorstorms(definedas1‐inchofrainormore).
Thefollowingwillnotbeallowedatornearworksitesforprojectactivities:trashdumping,firearms,openfires(suchasbarbecues)notrequiredbytheactivity,hunting,andpets(exceptforsafetyinremotelocations).
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1c:Avoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspeciesbyestablishingactivityexclusionzones
Wheresurveysdeterminethataspecial‐statusplantspeciesispresentinoradjacenttoaprojectarea,directandindirectimpactsoftheprojectonthespecieswillbeavoidedthroughtheestablishmentofactivityexclusionzones,withinwhichnoground‐disturbingactivitieswilltakeplace,includingconstructionofnewfacilities,constructionstaging,orothertemporaryworkareas.Activityexclusionzonesforspecial‐statusplantspecieswillbeestablishedaroundeachoccupiedhabitatsite,theboundariesofwhichwillbeclearlymarkedwithstandardorangeplasticconstructionexclusionfencingoritsequivalent.Theestablishmentofactivityexclusionzoneswillnotberequiredifnoconstruction‐relateddisturbanceswilloccurwithin250feetof
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐62
October 2014ICF 00323.08
theoccupiedhabitat.ThesizeofactivityexclusionzonesmaybereducedthroughconsultationwithaqualifiedbiologistandwithconcurrencefromCDFWbasedonsite‐specificconditions.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1d:Compensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies
Allprojectproponentswillavoidorminimizetemporaryandpermanentimpactsonspecial‐statusplantsthatoccuronprojectsitesandwillcompensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies.Althoughallimpactsonlarge‐floweredfiddleneck,diamond‐petaledCaliforniapoppy,andcaper‐fruitedtropidocarpumwillbeavoided,impactsonotherspecial‐statusplantspecieswillbeavoidedtotheextentfeasible,andanyunavoidableimpactswillbeaddressedthroughcompensatorymitigation.
Whereavoidanceofimpactsonaspecial‐statusplantspeciesisinfeasible,lossofindividualsoroccupiedhabitatofaspecial‐statusplantspeciesoccurrencewillbecompensatedforthroughtheacquisition,protection,andsubsequentmanagementinperpetuityofotherexistingoccurrencesata2:1ratio(occurrencesimpacted:occurrencespreserved).TheprojectproponentwillprovidedetailedinformationtotheCountyandCDFWonthelocationofthepreservedoccurrences,qualityofthepreservedhabitat,feasibilityofprotectingandmanagingtheareasin‐perpetuity,responsibilityparties,andotherpertinentinformation.Ifsuitableoccurrencesofaspecial‐statusplantspeciesarenotavailableforpreservation,thentheprojectwillberedesignedtoremovefeaturesthatwouldresultinimpactsonthatspecies.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
Allprojectproponentswillretainaqualifiedbiologist(asdeterminedbyAlamedaCounty)toconductperiodicmonitoringofdecommissioning,repowering,andreclamationactivitiesthatoccuradjacenttosensitivebiologicalresources(e.g.,special‐statusspecies,sensitivevegetationcommunities,wetlands).MonitoringwilloccurduringinitialgrounddisturbancewheresensitivebiologicalresourcesarepresentandweeklythereafterorasdeterminedbytheCountyincoordinationwithaqualifiedbiologist.Thebiologistwillassistthecrew,asneeded,tocomplywithallprojectimplementationrestrictionsandguidelines.Inaddition,thebiologistwillberesponsibleforensuringthattheprojectproponentoritscontractorsmaintainexclusionareasadjacenttosensitivebiologicalresources,andfordocumentingcompliancewithallbiologicalresources–relatedmitigationmeasures.
ImpactBIO‐1a‐2:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsorhabitatoccupiedbyspecial‐statusplants—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Ground‐disturbingactivitiesassociatedwithAlternative2couldresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsortheirhabitat.DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Directeffectsincludethosewhereplantsmayberemoved,damaged,orcrushed(seedlings)byground‐disturbingactivities,themovementorparkingofvehicles,and/ortheplacementofequipmentandsupplies.Grounddisturbancecankillordamagematureindividualsoreliminatetheirhabitat.Excavationalterssoilpropertiesandmaycreateconditionsunsuitableforthegrowthofsomespeciesorfavortheirreplacementbyotherspecies.Therootsofshrubsandotherperennial
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐63
October 2014ICF 00323.08
speciesaresusceptibletodamagefromsoilcompactionbyequipmentorconstructionmaterials.Possibleindirecteffectsonplantscouldresultfromerosionthatdegradeshabitatoraccidentalignitionofafirethatdamagesorkillsindividuals.Becausetheseground‐disturbingactivitiescouldhavesubstantialadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantspecies,thisimpactissignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1ewouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1a:Conductsurveystodeterminethepresenceorabsenceofspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1c:Avoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspeciesbyestablishingactivityexclusionzones
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1d:Compensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
ImpactBIO‐1b:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsorhabitatoccupiedbyspecial‐statusplants—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Ground‐disturbingactivitiesassociatedwiththeGoldenHillsProjectcouldresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsortheirhabitat.Directeffectsincludethoseeffectswhereplantsmayberemoved,damaged,orcrushed(seedlings)byground‐disturbingactivities,themovementorparkingofvehicles,and/ortheplacementofequipmentandsupplies.Grounddisturbancecankillordamagematureindividualsoreliminatetheirhabitat.Excavationalterssoilpropertiesandmaycreateconditionsunsuitableforthegrowthofsomespeciesorfavortheirreplacementbyotherspecies.Therootsofshrubsandotherperennialspeciesaresusceptibletodamagefromsoilcompactionbyequipmentorconstructionmaterials.Possibleindirecteffectsonplantscouldresultfromerosionthatdegradeshabitatoraccidentalignitionofafirethatdamagesorkillsindividuals.Becausetheseground‐disturbingactivitiescouldhavesubstantialadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantspecies,thisimpactissignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1ewouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐64
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1a:Conductsurveystodeterminethepresenceorabsenceofspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1c:Avoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspeciesbyestablishingactivityexclusionzones
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1d:Compensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
ImpactBIO‐1c:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsorhabitatoccupiedbyspecial‐statusplants—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Ground‐disturbingactivitiesassociatedwiththePattersonPassProjectcouldresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsortheirhabitat.Directeffectsincludethoseeffectswhereplantsmayberemoved,damaged,orcrushed(seedlings)byground‐disturbingactivities,themovementorparkingofvehicles,and/ortheplacementofequipmentandsupplies.Grounddisturbancecankillordamagematureindividualsoreliminatetheirhabitat.Excavationalterssoilpropertiesandmaycreateconditionsunsuitableforthegrowthofsomespeciesorfavortheirreplacementbyotherspecies.Therootsofshrubsandotherperennialspeciesaresusceptibletodamagefromsoilcompactionbyequipmentorconstructionmaterials.Possibleindirecteffectsonplantscouldresultfromerosionthatdegradeshabitatoraccidentalignitionofafirethatdamagesorkillsindividuals.Becausetheseground‐disturbingactivitiescouldhavesubstantialadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantspecies,thisimpactissignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1ewouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1a:Conductsurveystodeterminethepresenceorabsenceofspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1c:Avoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspeciesbyestablishingactivityexclusionzones
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1d:Compensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐65
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactBIO‐2a‐1:Adverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsandnaturalcommunitiesresultingfromtheintroductionandspreadofinvasiveplantspecies—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitieshavethepotentialtofacilitatetheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesbyremovingvegetationanddisturbingsoils.Constructionvehiclesandmachineryareprimaryvectorsforthespreadofsuchspecies.Invasivespeciescompetewithnativespeciesforresourcesandcanalternaturalcommunitiesbyinfluencingfireregimes,hydrology(e.g.,sedimentationanderosion),lightavailability,nutrientcycling,andsoilchemistry(RandallandHoshovsky2000).Invasivespeciesalsohavethepotentialtoharmhumanhealthandtheeconomybyadverselyaffectingnaturalecosystems,recreation,agriculturallands,anddevelopedareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2008).Theintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesasaresultofactivitiesassociatedwiththeprogramwouldconstituteasignificantindirectimpact.However,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐2,BIO‐5c,andWQ‐1wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐2:Preventintroduction,spread,andestablishmentofinvasiveplantspecies
Toavoidandminimizetheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspecies,allprojectproponentswillimplementthefollowingBMPs.
Constructionvehiclesandmachinerywillbecleanedpriortoenteringtheconstructionarea.Cleaningstationswillbeestablishedattheperimeteroftheconstructionareaalongallconstructionroutesorimmediatelyoffsite.
Vehicleswillbewashedonlyatapprovedareas.Nowashingofvehicleswilloccuratjobsites.
Todiscouragetheintroductionandestablishmentofinvasiveplantspecies,seedmixturesandstrawusedwithinnaturalvegetationwillbeeitherricestraworweed‐freestraw,asallowedbystateandfederalregulationofstormwaterrunoff.
Inaddition,theprojectproponentswillprepareandimplementerosionandsedimentcontrolplanstocontrolshort‐termandlong‐termerosionandsedimentationeffectsandtorestoresoilsandvegetationinareasaffectedbyconstructionactivities(MitigationMeasuresBIO‐1bandWQ‐1).Priortoinitiatinganyconstructionactivitiesthatwillresultintemporaryimpactsonnaturalcommunities,arestorationandmonitoringplanwillbedevelopedfortemporarilyaffectedhabitatsineachprojectarea(MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c).RestorationandmonitoringplanswillbesubmittedtotheCountyandCDFWforapproval.Theseplanswillincludemethodsforrestoringsoilconditionsandrevegetatingdisturbedareas,seedmixes,monitoringandmaintenanceschedules,adaptivemanagementstrategies,reportingrequirements,andsuccesscriteria.Followingcompletionofprojectconstruction,theprojectproponentswillimplementtherevegetationplanstorestoreareasdisturbedbyprojectactivitiestoaconditionofequalorgreaterhabitatfunctionthanoccurredpriortothedisturbance.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐66
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
Seediscussiononpages3.4‐78and3.4‐79.
MitigationMeasureWQ‐1:ComplywithNPDESrequirements
Seediscussiononpages3.9‐8and3.9‐9.
ImpactBIO‐2a‐2:Adverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsandnaturalcommunitiesresultingfromtheintroductionandspreadofinvasiveplantspecies—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitieshavethepotentialtofacilitatetheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesbyremovingvegetationanddisturbingsoils.Constructionvehiclesandmachineryareprimaryvectorsforthespreadofsuchspecies.Invasivespeciescompetewithnativespeciesforresourcesandcanalternaturalcommunitiesbyinfluencingfireregimes,hydrology(e.g.,sedimentationanderosion),lightavailability,nutrientcycling,andsoilchemistry(RandallandHoshovsky2000).Invasivespeciesalsohavethepotentialtoharmhumanhealthandtheeconomybyadverselyaffectingnaturalecosystems,recreation,agriculturallands,anddevelopedareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2008).Theintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesasaresultofactivitiesassociatedwiththeprogramwouldconstituteasignificantindirectimpact.EffectsunderAlternative2wouldbethesameasthoseunderAlternative1.Althoughtheareaofdisturbancewouldbe8%greaterunderAlternative2,theseverityoftheeffectsofintroductionandspreadofinvasiveplantspeciesdoesnotnecessarilycorrelatedirectlytothearealextentofdisturbance,butrathertothepracticesthatfacilitateintroduction.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐2wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐2:Preventintroduction,spread,andestablishmentofinvasiveplantspecies
ImpactBIO‐2b:Adverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsandnaturalcommunitiesresultingfromtheintroductionandspreadofinvasiveplantspecies—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitieshavethepotentialtofacilitatetheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesbyremovingvegetationanddisturbingsoils.Constructionvehiclesandmachineryareprimaryvectorsforthespreadofsuchspecies.Invasivespeciescompetewithnativespeciesforresourcesandcanalternaturalcommunitiesbyinfluencingfireregimes,hydrology(e.g.,sedimentationanderosion),lightavailability,nutrientcycling,andsoilchemistry(RandallandHoshovsky2000).Invasivespeciesalsohavethepotentialtoharmhumanhealthandtheeconomybyadverselyaffectingnaturalecosystems,recreation,agriculturallands,anddevelopedareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2008).TheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesasaresultofactivitiesassociatedwiththeGoldenHillsProjectwouldconstituteasignificantindirectimpact.However,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐2wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐67
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐2:Preventintroduction,spread,andestablishmentofinvasiveplantspecies
ImpactBIO‐2c:Adverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsandnaturalcommunitiesresultingfromtheintroductionandspreadofinvasiveplantspecies—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitieshavethepotentialtofacilitatetheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesbyremovingvegetationanddisturbingsoils.Constructionvehiclesandmachineryareprimaryvectorsforthespreadofsuchspecies.Invasivespeciescompetewithnativespeciesforresourcesandcanalternaturalcommunitiesbyinfluencingfireregimes,hydrology(e.g.,sedimentationanderosion),lightavailability,nutrientcycling,andsoilchemistry(RandallandHoshovsky2000).Invasivespeciesalsohavethepotentialtoharmhumanhealthandtheeconomybyadverselyaffectingnaturalecosystems,recreation,agriculturallands,anddevelopedareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2008).TheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesasaresultofactivitiesassociatedwiththePattersonPassProjectwouldconstituteasignificantindirectimpact.However,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐2wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐2:Preventintroduction,spread,andestablishmentofinvasiveplantspecies
ImpactBIO‐3a‐1:Potentialmortalityoforlossofhabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonlonghornfairyshrimp,vernalpoolfairyshrimp,vernalpooltadpoleshrimp(vernalpoolbranchiopods),andcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleortheirhabitats.Themajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelines;consequently,lossofpotentialvernalpoolbranchiopodandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlehabitatwouldgenerallybeavoided.However,directimpactsonhabitatassociatedwithroadconstructionorwideningandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromsomeconstructionactivities.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonalkaliwetland,seasonalwetland,andpondsthatmayprovidehabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleareshowninTable3.4‐7.Impactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforthebeetlecouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Constructionactivitiessuchasexcavation,grading,orstockpilingofsoil,couldfill,remove,orotherwisealtersuitablehabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleandcouldresultininjuryormortalityofthesespecies.Suchground‐disturbingactivitiesmaybeassociatedwithinstallationofpowercollectionandcommunicationsystemsandroadconstructionandwidening.Vernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlescouldalsobeinjuredorkilledifvehiclesorconstructionequipmentaredriventhroughoccupiedhabitat,orifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsentertheirhabitat.Changesinhydrologyorsedimentationofhabitatfromerosionassociatedwithprojectconstructioncouldalterthesuitabilityofhabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleandcouldcausemortality.
Operationandmaintenanceactivitiesmayalsoresultinimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsortheirhabitats.Useofherbicidesnearoccupiedhabitatcouldresultinmortalityorreducedfitnessof
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐68
October 2014ICF 00323.08
vernalpoolbranchiopods(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1996).Herbicideorpesticideusenearorupstreamofsuitablehabitatforcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlecouldresultinmortalityorreducedfitnessofthebeetle.Roadandfirebreakmaintenancemayalsoresultindegradationofhabitatorinjuryormortalityofvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetles.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheprojectcouldreducethelocalpopulationsoffederallylistedvernalpoolbranchiopodsandararebeetlespeciesthroughdirectmortalityandhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,andBIO‐3bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
Nomorethan3yearspriortoground‐disturbingrepoweringactivities,aqualifiedbiologist(asdeterminedbyAlamedaCounty)willconductfieldsurveyswithindecommissioning,repowering,andrestorationworkareasandtheirimmediatesurroundingstodeterminethepresenceofhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies.TheprojectproponentwillsubmitareportdocumentingthesurveyresultstoAlamedaCountyforreviewpriortoconductinganyrepoweringactivities.Thereportwillincludethelocationanddescriptionofallproposedworkareas,thelocationanddescriptionofallsuitablehabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies,andthelocationanddescriptionofothersensitivehabitats(e.g.,vernalpools,wetlands,riparianareas).Additionally,thereportwilloutlinewhereadditionalspecies‐and/orhabitat‐specificmitigationmeasuresarerequired.Thisreportmayprovidethebasisforanyapplicablepermitapplicationswhereincidentaltakemayoccur.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3b:Implementmeasurestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle
Wheresuitablehabitatforlistedvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleareidentifiedwithin250feet(oranotherdistanceasdeterminedbyaqualifiedbiologistbasedontopographyandothersiteconditions)ofproposedworkareas,thefollowingmeasureswillbeimplementedtoensurethattherepoweringprojectsdonothaveadverseimpactsonlistedvernalpoolbranchiopodsorcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle.ThesemeasuresarebasedonmeasuresfromtheEACCS,withsomemodificationsandadditions.Additionalconservationmeasuresorconditionsofapprovalmayberequiredinapplicableprojectpermits(e.g.,ESAincidentaltakepermit).
Avoidalldirectimpactsonsandstonerockoutcropvernalpools.
Grounddisturbancewillbeavoidedfromthefirstdayofthefirstsignificantrain(1inchormore)untilJune1,oruntilpoolsremaindryfor72hoursandnosignificantrainisforecastonthedayofsuchgrounddisturbance.
Ifvernalpools,clayflats,alkalinepools,ephemeralstocktanks(orponds),sandstonepools,orroadsideditchesarepresentwithin250feetoftheworkarea(oranotherappropriate
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐69
October 2014ICF 00323.08
distanceasdeterminedbyaqualifiedbiologistonthebasisoftopographyandothersiteconditions),thebiologistwillstakeandflaganexclusionzonepriortoconstructionactivities.Thewidthoftheexclusionzonewillbebasedonsiteconditionsandwillbethemaximumpracticabledistancethatensuresprotectionofthefeaturefromdirectandindirecteffectsoftheproject.Exclusionzoneswillbeestablishedaroundfeatureswhethertheyarewetordryatthetime.Theexclusionzonewillbefencedwithorangeconstructionzoneanderosioncontrolfencing(tobeinstalledbyconstructioncrew).
Noherbicidewillbeappliedwithin100feetofexclusionzones,exceptwhenappliedtocutstumpsorfrilledstemsorinjectedintostems.Nobroadcastapplicationswillbeallowed.
Avoidmodifyingorchangingthehydrologyofaquatichabitats.
Minimizetheworkareaforstreamcrossingsandconductworkduringthedryseason(June1throughthefirstsignificantrainofthefall/winter).
Installutilitycollectionlinesacrossperennialcreeksbyboringunderthecreek.
Whereimpactscannotbeavoidedorminimized,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewithmitigationratiosandrequirementsdevelopedundertheEACCS(AppendixC).Intheeventthatanincidentaltakepermitisrequired,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewiththetermsofthepermitinconsultationwithUSFWS.
ImpactBIO‐3a‐2:Potentialmortalityoforlossofhabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Constructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleortheirhabitats.Themajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelines;consequently,lossofpotentialvernalpoolbranchiopodandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlehabitatwouldgenerallybeavoided.However,directimpactsonhabitatassociatedwithroadconstructionorwideningandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromsomeconstructionactivities.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonalkaliwetland,seasonalwetland,andpondsthatmayprovidehabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleareshowninTable3.4‐7.Impactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforthebeetlecouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Constructionactivitiessuchasexcavation,grading,orstockpilingofsoil,couldfill,remove,orotherwisealtersuitablehabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleandcouldresultininjuryormortalityofthesespecies.Suchground‐disturbingactivitiesmaybeassociatedwithinstallationofpowercollectionandcommunicationsystemsandroadconstructionandwidening.Vernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlescouldalsobeinjuredorkilledifvehiclesorconstructionequipmentaredriventhroughoccupiedhabitat,orifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsentertheirhabitat.Changesinhydrologyorsedimentationofhabitatfromerosionassociatedwithprojectconstructioncouldalterthesuitabilityofhabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleandcouldcausemortality.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐70
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Operationandmaintenanceactivitiesmayalsoresultinimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsortheirhabitats.Useofherbicidesnearoccupiedhabitatcouldresultinmortalityorreducedfitnessofvernalpoolbranchiopods(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1996).Herbicideorpesticideusenearorupstreamofsuitablehabitatforcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlecouldresultinmortalityorreducedfitnessofthebeetle.Roadandfirebreakmaintenancemayalsoresultindegradationofhabitatorinjuryormortalityofvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetles.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheprojectcouldreducethelocalpopulationsoffederallylistedvernalpoolbranchiopodsandararebeetlespeciesthroughdirectmortalityandhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,andBIO‐3bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3b:Implementmeasurestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle
ImpactBIO‐3b:Potentialmortalityoforlossofhabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceoftheGoldenHillsprojectonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlewouldbesimilartothosedescribedabovefortheprogram.Themajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelines;consequently,lossofpotentialvernalpoolbranchiopodandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlehabitatwouldgenerallybeavoided.However,directimpactsonhabitatassociatedwithroadconstructionorwideningandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromsomeconstructionactivities.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonalkaliwetland,seasonalwetland,andpondsthatmayprovidehabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleareshowninTable3.4‐8.Impactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforthebeetlecouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheprojectcouldreducethelocalpopulationsoffederallylistedvernalpoolbranchiopodsandararebeetlespeciesthroughdirectmortalityandhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,andBIO‐3bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐71
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3b:Implementmeasurestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle
ImpactBIO‐3c:Potentialmortalityoforlossofhabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Theseasonalwetlandthatprovidessuitablehabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlewouldnotbefilledorremoved.However,mortalityoftheseaquaticspeciescouldoccurifoilorothercontaminantsenterthewetlandduringconstruction.Additionally,theseasonalwetlandcouldbeindirectlyaffectedifthehydrologyofthewetlandismodifiedasaresultofprojectconstruction.Smallareasofotherseasonalwetlandsandstream/freshwatermarshthatmayprovidesuitablehabitatforcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlewouldbetemporarilyaffectedduringconstructionofcollectorlines.Noneofthepondsthatprovidesuitablehabitatforcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlewouldbefilledorremoved.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonseasonalwetlandandstream/freshwatermarshthatmayprovidehabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleareshowninTable3.4‐9.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheprojectcouldreducethelocalpopulationsoffederallylistedvernalpoolbranchiopodsandararebeetlespeciesthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,andBIO‐3bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3b:Implementmeasurestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle
ImpactBIO‐4a‐1:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Removalofhabitat(elderberryshrubs)andpotentialinjuryormortalityofvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleassociatedwithremovalofelderberryshrubswouldbeconsidereddirecteffectsonthespecies.Trimmingofelderberrybranches1inchormoreindiametercouldalsoresultininjuryormortalityofvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.Becausevalleyelderberrylonghornbeetlelarvaemayfeedontherootsofelderberries,disturbanceofelderberryrootswithintheshrubdriplinecouldalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Reductionofwaterinfiltrationtoelderberryshrubscausedbychangesintopographyorcompactionofsoilfromconstructioncouldresultinreducedshrubvigor/vitalityandanassociateddecreaseinshoot,leaf,andflowerproductionand
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐72
October 2014ICF 00323.08
couldultimatelyreducethesuitabilityoftheshrubstoprovidehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.
Operationsandmaintenanceactivitiessuchasuseofherbicidesmayalsoaffectvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleoritshabitat.Valleyelderberrylonghornbeetlescouldbeindirectlyaffectedifthereisalossofconnectivitybetweenelderberryshrubswhenelderberriesorassociatedvegetationisremoved.Removalofsuchvegetationcouldresultingapsinvegetationthataretoowideforbeetlestocrossbecauseoftheirfairlylimitedmovementdistances(Talleyetal.2006),resultinginseparationofindividualsorreducingthepossibilityofcolonizationofadjacentareas.Althoughmoreresearchisneeded,valleyelderberrylonghornbeetleshavebeenobservedtoflyamileormoreincontiguousorfairlycontiguoushabitat,andexitholeshavebeenobservedonisolatedshrubs0.25mile(0.4kilometer)ormorefromthenextnearestelderberry(Arnoldpers.comm.).Becauseelderberriesareexpectedtobewidelyseparatedduetothelimitedamountofriparianhabitatintheprogramarea,theremovalofanyelderberryshrubscouldconstituteasignificantimpact.Anyoftheseimpactscouldbesignificantbecausetheycouldreducethelocalpopulationsizeofafederallylistedspeciesthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐4a,andBIO‐4bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
IfitisdeterminedthroughpreconstructionsurveysconductedpursuanttoMitigationMeasureBIO‐3athatelderberryshrubsarepresentwithinproposedworkareasorwithin100feetoftheseareas,thefollowingmeasureswillbeimplementedtoensurethattheproposedprojectdoesnothaveasignificantimpactonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.
Avoidremovalofelderberryshrubs.
Elderberryshrubs/clusterswithin100feetoftheconstructionareathatwillnotberemovedwillbeprotectedduringconstruction.Aqualifiedbiologist(i.e.,withelderberry/VELBexperience)willmarktheelderberryshrubsandclustersthatwillbeprotectedduringconstruction.Orangeconstructionbarrierfencingwillbeplacedattheedgeofthebufferareas.ThebufferareadistanceswillbeproposedbythebiologistandapprovedbyUSFWS.Noconstructionactivitieswillbepermittedwithinthebufferzoneotherthanthoseactivitiesnecessarytoerectthefencing.Signswillbepostedevery50feet(15.2meters)alongtheperimeterofthebufferareafencing.Thesignswillcontainthefollowinginformation:Thisareaishabitatofthevalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle,athreatenedspecies,andmustnotbedisturbed.ThisspeciesisprotectedbytheEndangeredSpeciesActof1973,asamended.Violatorsaresubjecttoprosecution,fines,andimprisonment.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐73
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Bufferareafencesaroundelderberryshrubswillbeinspectedweeklybyaqualifiedbiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesandmonthlyafterground‐disturbingactivitiesuntilprojectconstructioniscompleteoruntilthefencesareremoved,asapprovedbythebiologicalmonitorandtheresidentengineer.Thebiologicalmonitorwillberesponsibleforensuringthatthecontractormaintainsthebufferareafencesaroundelderberryshrubsthroughoutconstruction.BiologicalinspectionreportswillbeprovidedtotheprojectproponentandUSFWS.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4b:Compensatefordirectandindirecteffectsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
IfelderberryshrubscannotbeavoidedandprotectedasoutlinedinMitigationMeasure4a,theprojectproponentwillobtainanincidentaltakepermitfromUSFWSandcompensateforthelossofanyelderberryshrubs.Surveysofelderberryshrubstobetransplantedwillbeconductedbyaqualifiedbiologistpriortotransplantation.SurveyswillbeconductedinaccordancewiththeConservationGuidelinesfortheValleyElderberryLonghornBeetle(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1999).Surveyresultsandananalysisofthenumberofelderberryseedlings/cuttingsandassociatednativeplantsbasedonthesurveyresultswillbesubmittedtoUSFWSinabiologicalassessmentoranHCP.Afterreceiptofanincidentaltakepermitandbeforeconstructionbegins,theprojectproponentwillcompensatefordirecteffectsonelderberryshrubsbytransplantingshrubsthatcannotbeavoidedtoaUSFWS‐approvedconservationarea.Elderberryseedlingsorcuttingsandassociatednativespecieswillalsobeplantedintheconservationarea.Eachelderberrystemmeasuring1inchormoreindiameteratgroundlevelthatisadverselyaffected(i.e.,transplantedordestroyed)willbereplaced,intheconservationarea,withelderberryseedlingsorcuttingsataratiorangingfrom1:1to8:1(newplantingstoaffectedstems).Thenumbersofelderberryseedlings/cuttingsandassociatedripariannativetrees/shrubstobeplantedasreplacementhabitataredeterminedbystemsizeclassofaffectedelderberryshrubs,presenceorabsenceofexitholes,andwhethertheshrubliesinariparianornonriparianarea.Stockofeitherseedlingsorcuttingswouldbeobtainedfromlocalsources.
AtthediscretionofUSFWS,shrubsthatareunlikelytosurvivetransplantationbecauseofpoorconditionorlocation,oraplantthatwouldbeextremelydifficulttomovebecauseofaccessproblems,maybeexemptedfromtransplantation.Incaseswheretransplantationisnotpossible,minimizationratioswouldbeincreasedtooffsettheadditionalhabitatloss.
TherelocationoftheelderberryshrubswillbeconductedaccordingtoUSFWS‐approvedproceduresoutlinedintheConservationGuidelines(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1999).Elderberryshrubswithintheprojectconstructionareathatcannotbeavoidedwillbetransplantedduringtheplant’sdormantphase(Novemberthroughthefirst2weeksofFebruary).Aqualifiedbiologicalmonitorwillremainonsitewhiletheshrubsarebeingtransplanted.
Evidenceofvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleoccurrenceintheconservationarea,theconditionoftheelderberryshrubsintheconservationarea,andthegeneralconditionoftheconservationareaitselfwillbemonitoredoveraperiodof10consecutiveyearsorfor7yearsovera15‐yearperiodfromthedateoftransplanting.TheprojectproponentwillberesponsibleforfundingandprovidingmonitoringreportstoUSFWSineachoftheyearsinwhichamonitoringreportisrequired.AsspecifiedintheConservationGuidelines,thereportwillincludeinformationontimingandrateofirrigation,growthrates,andsurvivalratesandmortality.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐74
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactBIO‐4a‐2:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Removalofelderberryshrubsandpotentialinjuryormortalityofvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleassociatedwithremovalofelderberryshrubswouldbeconsidereddirecteffectsonthespecies.Trimmingofelderberrybranches1inchormoreindiametercouldalsoresultininjuryormortalityofvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.Becausevalleyelderberrylonghornbeetlelarvaemayfeedontherootsofelderberries,disturbanceofelderberryrootswithintheshrubdriplinecouldalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Reductionofwaterinfiltrationtoelderberryshrubscausedbychangesintopographyorcompactionofsoilfromconstructioncouldresultinreducedshrubvigor/vitalityandanassociateddecreaseinshoot,leaf,andflowerproductionandcouldultimatelyreducethesuitabilityoftheshrubstoprovidehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.
Operationsandmaintenanceactivitiessuchasuseofherbicidesmayalsoaffectvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleoritshabitat.Valleyelderberrylonghornbeetlescouldbeindirectlyaffectedifthereisalossofconnectivitybetweenelderberryshrubswhenelderberriesorassociatedvegetationisremoved.Removalofsuchvegetationcouldresultingapsinvegetationthataretoowideforbeetlestocrossbecauseoftheirfairlylimitedmovementdistances(Talleyetal.2006),resultinginseparationofindividualsorreducingthepossibilityofcolonizationofadjacentareas.Althoughmoreresearchisneeded,valleyelderberrylonghornbeetleshavebeenobservedtoflyamileormoreincontiguousorfairlycontiguoushabitat,andexitholeshavebeenobservedonisolatedshrubs0.25mile(0.4kilometer)ormorefromthenextnearestelderberry(Arnoldpers.comm.).Becauseelderberriesareexpectedtobewidelyseparatedduetothelimitedamountofriparianhabitatintheprogramarea,theremovalofanyelderberryshrubscouldconstituteasignificantimpact.Anyoftheseimpactscouldbesignificantbecausetheycouldreducethelocalpopulationsizeofafederallylistedspeciesthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐4a,andBIO‐4bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4b:Compensatefordirectandindirecteffectsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐75
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactBIO‐4b:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
IfelderberryshrubsarepresentintheGoldenHillsprojectarea,theycouldbeaffectedbyprojectconstructionandoperation.Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceoftheGoldenHillsprojectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.Removalofhabitat(elderberryshrubs),injuryormortalityofbeetles,cuttingelderberrybranchesorrootsthatare1inchormoreindiameter,andchangesinhydrologywoulddirectlyaffectvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.Thebeetlemayalsobeindirectlyaffectedbyoperationsandmaintenanceactivitiessuchasuseofherbicidesorthroughthelossofconnectivitybetweenelderberryshrubswhenshrubsorassociatedvegetationareremoved.Becauseelderberriesareexpectedtobewidelyseparatedduetothelimitedamountofriparianhabitatintheprojectvicinity,theremovalofanyelderberryshrubscouldconstituteasignificantimpact.Anyoftheseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheycouldreducethelocalpopulationsizeofafederallylistedspeciesthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐4a,andBIO‐4bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4b:Compensatefordirectandindirecteffectsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
ImpactBIO‐4c:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Noneofthe39elderberryshrubsinthePattersonPassprojectareawouldberemovedinordertoconstructtheproject.Oneoftheshrubsislocatedwithin100feetofaconstructionaccessroadandcouldbesubjectedtoincreasedlevelsofdustduringconstruction,potentiallyleadingtoreducedvigoroftheshrubandconsequentlyaffectingvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.However,accordingtoTalleyetal.(2006b:654–655),anexperimentalongtheAmericanRiverParkway(SacramentoCounty)showedthatconditionsofelderberryshrubsassociatedwithdustfromnearbytrailsandroads(pavedanddirt)didnotaffectthepresenceofvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.Thebeetlemayalsobeindirectlyaffectedbyoperationsandmaintenanceactivitiessuchasuseofherbicides,whichcouldharmelderberryshrubsand/orthebeetle.Impactsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetlewouldbesignificantbecausesuchimpactscouldreducethelocalpopulationsizeofafederallylistedspeciesthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐4a,andBIO‐4bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐76
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4b:Compensatefordirectandindirecteffectsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
ImpactBIO‐5a‐1:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,andfoothillyellow‐leggedfrog—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ConstructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,andfoothillyellow‐leggedfrog(collectivelyreferredtoasspecial‐statusamphibians)ortheirhabitats(seasonalwetland,freshwatermarsh,mixedwillowriparianscrub,ponds,drainages,andsurroundinguplandareas).Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonseasonalwetland,freshwatermarsh,mixedwillowriparianscrub,andpondsthatmayprovidehabitatforspecial‐statusamphibiansareshowninTable3.4‐7.ImpactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrogandfoothillyellow‐leggedfrogcouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.ThemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceonsuitableuplandgrasslanddispersalandaestivationhabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,andCaliforniared‐leggedfrog.Aquatichabitatsforspecials‐statusamphibianswouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.
Constructionactivitiessuchasexcavation,grading,orstockpilingofsoil,couldfill,removeorotherwisealtersuitablehabitatforspecial‐statusamphibiansorresultininjuryormortalityofindividualamphibians.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofuplandhabitatthatresultsindamageoreliminationofsuitableaestivationburrows.Specificactivitiesthatmayaffectthesespeciescouldincludeinstallationofpowercollectionandcommunicationsystems,turbineconstruction,roadinfrastructureconstruction/maintenanceandupgrades,meteorologicaltowerinstallationandremoval,temporarystagingareaset‐up,andreclamationactivities.Special‐statusamphibianscouldbeinjuredorkilledifvehiclesorconstructionequipmentaredriventhroughoccupiedhabitat,orifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsenterhabitat.Changesinhydrologyorsedimentationofhabitatfromerosionassociatedwithprojectconstructioncouldalterthesuitabilityoftheirhabitatorcausemortality.
Operationandmaintenanceactivitiesmayalsoresultinimpactsonspecial‐statusamphibiansortheirhabitats.Travelonmaintenanceroadsduringtherainyseasonorwhenamphibiansaredispersingcouldresultinmortalityofindividuals.Roadandfirebreakmaintenancecouldresultindegradationofhabitatorinjuryormortalityofspecial‐statusamphibians.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheycouldreducethelocalpopulationsizesoffederallylistedandsensitive
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐77
October 2014ICF 00323.08
amphibiansthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,andBIO‐5athroughBIO‐5cwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
AllprojectproponentswillensurethatBMPsandotherappropriatemeasures,inaccordancewithmeasuresdevelopedfortheEACCS,beincorporatedintotheappropriatedesignandconstructiondocuments.ImplementationofsomeofthesemeasureswillrequirethattheprojectproponentobtainincidentaltakepermitsfromUSFWS(Californiared‐leggedfrogandCaliforniatigersalamander)andfromCDFW(Californiatigersalamanderonly)beforeconstructionbegins.Additionalconservationmeasuresorconditionsofapprovalmayberequiredinapplicableprojectpermits(e.g.,ESAorCESAincidentaltakeauthorization).TheapplicantwillcomplywiththeStateofCaliforniaStateWaterResourcesControlBoardNPDESconstructiongeneralrequirementsforstormwater.
Ground‐disturbingactivitieswillbelimitedtodryweatherbetweenApril15andOctober31.Noground‐disturbingworkwilloccurduringwetweather.Wetweatherisdefinedaswhentherehasbeen0.25inchofrainina24‐hourperiod.GrounddisturbingactivitieshaltedduetowetweathermayresumewhenprecipitationceasesandtheNationalWeatherService72‐hourweatherforecastindicatesa30%orlesschanceofprecipitation.Noground‐disturbingworkwilloccurduringadry‐outperiodof48hoursaftertheabovereferencedwetweather.
Whereapplicable,barrierfencingwillbeinstalledaroundtheworksitetopreventamphibiansfromenteringtheworkarea.Barrierfencingwillberemovedwithin72hoursofcompletionofwork.
Beforeconstructionbegins,aqualifiedbiologistwilllocateappropriaterelocationareasandpreparearelocationplanforspecial‐statusamphibiansthatmayneedtobemovedduringconstruction.TheproponentwillsubmitthisplantoUSFWSandCDFWforapprovalaminimumof2weekspriortothestartofconstruction.
Aqualifiedbiologistwillconductpreconstructionsurveysimmediatelypriortoground‐disturbingactivities(includingequipmentstaging,vegetationremoval,grading).Thebiologistwillsurveytheworkareaandallsuitablehabitatswithin300feetoftheworkarea.Ifindividuals(includingadults,juveniles,larvae,oreggs)arefound,workwillnotbeginuntilUSFWSand/orCDFWiscontactedtodetermineifmovingtheselife‐stagesisappropriate.Ifrelocationisdeemednecessary,itwillbeconductedinaccordancewiththerelocationplan.IncidentaltakepermitsarerequiredforrelocationofCaliforniatigersalamander(USFWSandCDFW)andCaliforniared‐leggedfrog(USFWS).Relocationof
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐78
October 2014ICF 00323.08
westernspadefootandfoothillyellow‐leggedfrogrequiresaletterfromCDFWauthorizingthisactivity.
Nomonofilamentplasticwillbeusedforerosioncontrol.
Allprojectactivitywillterminate30minutesbeforesunsetandwillnotresumeuntil30minutesaftersunriseduringthemigration/activeseasonfromNovember1toJune15.SunriseandsunsettimesareestablishedbytheU.S.NavalObservatoryAstronomicalApplicationsDepartmentforthegeographicareawheretheprojectislocated.
Vehicleswillnotexceedaspeedlimitof15mphonunpavedroadswithinnaturallandcovertypes,orduringoffroadtravel.
Trenchesorholesmorethan6inchesdeepwillbeprovidedwithoneormoreescaperampsconstructedofearthfillorwoodenplanksandwillbeinspectedbyaqualifiedbiologistpriortobeingfilled.Anysuchfeaturesthatareleftopenovernightwillbesearchedeachdaypriortoconstructionactivitiestoensurenocoveredspeciesaretrapped.Workwillnotcontinueuntiltrappedanimalshavemovedoutofopentrenches.
Workcrewsortheonsitebiologicalmonitorwillinspectopentrenches,pits,andunderconstructionequipmentandmaterialleftonsiteinthemorningandeveningtolookforamphibiansthatmayhavebecometrappedorareseekingrefuge.
Ifspecial‐statusamphibiansarefoundintheworkareaduringconstructionandcannotordonotmoveoffsiteontheirown,aqualifiedbiologistwhoisUSFWSand/orCDFW‐approvedunderabiologicalopinionand/orincidentaltakepermitforthespecificproject,willtrapandmovespecial‐statusamphibiansinaccordancewiththerelocationplan.Relocationofwesternspadefootandfoothillyellow‐leggedfrogrequiresaletterpermitfromCDFWauthorizingthisactivity.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
Whereimpactsonaquaticanduplandhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibianscannotbeavoidedorminimized,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewithmitigationratiosandrequirementsdevelopedundertheEACCS(AppendixC).Intheeventthattakeauthorizationisrequired,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewiththetermsoftheauthorizationinconsultationwithUSFWSand/orCDFW.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
Within30dayspriortoanygrounddisturbance,aqualifiedbiologistwillprepareaGrasslandRestorationPlanincoordinationwithCDFWandsubjecttoCDFWapproval,toensurethattemporarilydisturbedannualgrasslandsandareasplannedfortheremovalofpermanentroadsandturbinepadareasarerestoredtopreprojectconditions.TheGrasslandRestorationPlanwillincludebutnotbelimitedtothefollowingmeasures.
Gravelwillberemovedfromareasproposedforgrasslandrestoration.
Tothemaximumextentfeasible,topsoilwillbesalvagedfromwithinonsiteworkareaspriortoconstruction.Importedfillsoilswillbelimitedtoweed‐freetopsoilsimilarintexture,chemicalcomposition,andpHtosoilsfoundattherestorationsite.
Whereappropriate,restorationareaswillbeseeded(hydroseedingisacceptable)toensureerosioncontrol.Seedmixeswillbetailoredtocloselymatchthatofreferencesite(s)within
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐79
October 2014ICF 00323.08
theprogramareaandshouldincludenativeornaturalized,noninvasivespeciessourcedwithintheprojectareaorfromthenearestavailablelocation.
Reclaimedroadswillberestoredinsuchawayastopermanentlypreventvehiculartravel.
Theplanwillincludearequirementtomonitorrestorationareasannually(betweenMarchandOctober)forupto3yearsfollowingtheyearofrestoration.Therestorationwillbeconsideredsuccessfulwhenthepercentcoverforrestoredareasis70%absolutecoveroftheplanted/seededspeciescomparedtothepercentabsolutecoverofnearbyreferencesites.Nomorethan5%relativecoverofthevegetationintherestorationareaswillconsistofinvasiveplantspeciesratedas“high”inCal‐IPC’sCaliforniaInvasivePlantInventoryDatabase(http://www.cal‐ipc.org).Remedialmeasuresprescribedintheplanwillincludesupplementalseeding,weedcontrol,andotheractionsasdeterminednecessarytoachievethelong‐termsuccesscriteria.Monitoringmaybeextendedifnecessarytoachievethesuccesscriteriaorifdroughtconditionsprecluderestorationsuccess.Otherperformancestandardsmayalsoberequiredastheyrelatetospecial‐statusspecieshabitat;thesewillbeidentifiedincoordinationwithCDFWandincludedintheplan.TheprojectproponentwillprovideevidencethatCDFWhasreviewedandapprovedtheGrasslandRestorationPlan.Additionally,theprojectproponentwillprovideannualmonitoringreportstotheCountybyJanuary31ofeachyear,summarizingthemonitoringresultsandanyremedialmeasuresimplemented(ifanyarenecessary)duringthepreviousyear.
ImpactBIO‐5a‐2:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,andfoothillyellow‐leggedfrog—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Constructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonspecial‐statusamphibiansortheirhabitats(seasonalwetland,freshwatermarsh,mixedwillowriparianscrub,ponds,drainages,andsurroundinguplandareas).Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonseasonalwetland,freshwatermarsh,mixedwillowriparianscrub,andpondsthatmayprovidehabitatforspecial‐statusamphibiansareshowninTable3.4‐7.ImpactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrogandfoothillyellow‐leggedfrogcouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.ThemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceonsuitableuplandgrasslanddispersalandaestivationhabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,andCaliforniared‐leggedfrog.Aquatichabitatsforspecials‐statusamphibianswouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.
Constructionactivitiessuchasexcavation,grading,orstockpilingofsoil,couldfill,removeorotherwisealtersuitablehabitatforspecial‐statusamphibiansorresultininjuryormortalityofindividualamphibians.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofuplandhabitatthatresultsindamageoreliminationofsuitableaestivationburrows.Specificactivitiesthatmayaffectthesespeciescouldincludeinstallationofpowercollectionandcommunicationsystems,turbineconstruction,roadinfrastructureconstruction/maintenanceandupgrades,meteorologicaltowerinstallationandremoval,temporarystagingareaset‐up,andreclamationactivities.Special‐
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐80
October 2014ICF 00323.08
statusamphibianscouldbeinjuredorkilledifvehiclesorconstructionequipmentaredriventhroughoccupiedhabitat,orifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsenterhabitat.Changesinhydrologyorsedimentationofhabitatfromerosionassociatedwithprojectconstructioncouldalterthesuitabilityoftheirhabitatorcausemortality.
Operationandmaintenanceactivitiesmayalsoresultinimpactsonspecial‐statusamphibiansortheirhabitats.Travelonmaintenanceroadsduringtherainyseasonorwhenamphibiansaredispersingcouldresultinmortalityofindividuals.Roadandfirebreakmaintenancecouldresultindegradationofhabitatorinjuryormortalityofspecial‐statusamphibians.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheycouldreducethelocalpopulationsizesoffederallylistedandsensitiveamphibiansthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,andBIO‐5athroughBIO‐5cwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
ImpactBIO‐5b:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,andfoothillyellow‐leggedfrog—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.ThemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceonpotentialuplandgrasslanddispersalandaestivationhabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,andCaliforniared‐leggedfrog.Aquatichabitatsforspecials‐statusamphibianswouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonseasonalwetland,mixedwillowriparianforest,andpondsthatmayprovidehabitatforspecial‐statusamphibiansareshowninTable3.4‐8.ImpactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrogandfoothillyellow‐leggedfrogcouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheycouldreducethelocalpopulationsizesoffederallylistedandsensitiveamphibiansthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,andBIO‐5athroughBIO‐5cwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐81
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
ImpactBIO‐5c:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,andfoothillyellow‐leggedfrog—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceofthePattersonPassProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.ThemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceonpotentialuplandgrasslanddispersalandaestivationhabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,andCaliforniared‐leggedfrog.Aquatichabitatsforspecials‐statusamphibianswouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonseasonalwetland,mixedwillowriparianforest,andpondsthatmayprovidehabitatforspecial‐statusamphibiansareshowninTable3.4‐9.ImpactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrogandfoothillyellow‐leggedfrogcouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheycouldreducethelocalpopulationsizesoffederallylistedandsensitiveamphibiansthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,Bio‐3,BIO‐5athroughBIO‐5cwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐82
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactBIO‐6a‐1:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforwesternpondturtle—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonwesternpondturtleoritshabitats(ponds,reservoirs,drainages,andsurroundingriparianandgrasslandareas).Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonponds,reservoirs,riparian,andgrasslandthatmayprovidehabitatforwesternpondturtleareshowninTable3.4‐7.Impactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforwesternpondturtlecouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Becausethemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelines,suitableaquatichabitatwouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.
Aquaticandupland(overwintering,nesting)habitatforwesternpondturtlemayberemovedortemporarilydisturbedbyconstructionactivities.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofaquaticoruplandnestinghabitat.Westernpondturtlescouldalsobeinjuredorkilledifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsenterhabitat.Declinesinpopulationsofwesternpondturtlethroughoutthespecies’rangehavebeendocumented(JenningsandHayes1994).Lossofindividualsintheprogramareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthespecies.Thelossofuplandnestingsitesoreggswouldalsodecreasethelocalpopulation.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant,butimplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,andBIO‐6wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐6:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforwesternpondturtleandmonitorconstructionactivitiesifturtlesareobserved
IfitisdeterminedthroughpreconstructionsurveysconductedpursuanttoMitigationMeasureBIO‐3athatsuitableaquaticoruplandhabitatforwesternpondturtleispresentwithinproposedworkareas,thefollowingmeasures,consistentwithmeasuresdevelopedfortheEACCS,willbeimplementedtoensurethattheproposedprojectdoesnothaveasignificantimpactonwesternpondturtle.
Oneweekbeforeandwithin24hoursofbeginningworkinsuitableaquatichabitat,aqualifiedbiologist(onewhoisfamiliarwithdifferentspeciesofturtles)willconductsurveysforwesternpondturtle.Thesurveysshouldbetimedtocoincidewiththetimeofdayandyearwhenturtlesaremostlikelytobeactive(duringthecoolerpartofthedaybetween8a.m.and12p.m.duringspringandsummer).Priortoconductingthesurveys,thebiologistshouldlocatethemicrohabitatsforturtlebasking(logs,rocks,brushthickets)anddeterminealocationtoquietlyobserveturtles.Eachsurveyshouldincludea30‐minutewaittimeafterarrivingonsitetoallowstartledturtlestoreturntoopenbaskingareas.The
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐83
October 2014ICF 00323.08
surveyshouldconsistofaminimum15‐minuteobservationperiodforeachareawhereturtlescouldbeobserved.
Ifwesternpondturtlesareobservedduringeithersurvey,abiologicalmonitorwillbepresentduringconstructionactivitiesintheaquatichabitatwheretheturtlewasobserved.Thebiologicalmonitoralsowillbemindfulofsuitablenestingandoverwinteringareasinproximitytosuitableaquatichabitatandwillperiodicallyinspecttheseareasfornestsandturtles.
Ifoneormorewesternpondturtlesarefoundintheworkareaduringconstructionandcannotordonotmoveoffsiteontheirown,aqualifiedbiologistwillremoveandrelocatetheturtletoappropriateaquatichabitatoutsideandawayfromtheconstructionarea.RelocationofwesternpondturtlerequiresaletterfromCDFWauthorizingthisactivity.
ImpactBIO‐6a‐2:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforwesternpondturtle—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Constructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonwesternpondturtleoritshabitats(ponds,reservoirs,drainages,andsurroundingriparianandgrasslandareas).Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonponds,reservoirs,riparian,andgrasslandthatmayprovidehabitatforwesternpondturtleareshowninTable3.4‐7.Impactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforwesternpondturtlecouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Becausethemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelines,suitableaquatichabitatwouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.
Aquaticandupland(overwintering,nesting)habitatforwesternpondturtlemayberemovedortemporarilydisturbedbyconstructionactivities.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofaquaticoruplandnestinghabitat.Westernpondturtlescouldalsobeinjuredorkilledifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsenterhabitat.Declinesinpopulationsofwesternpondturtlethroughoutthespecies’rangehavebeendocumented(JenningsandHayes1994).Lossofindividualsintheprogramareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthespecies.Thelossofuplandnestingsitesoreggswouldalsodecreasethelocalpopulation.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant,butimplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,andBIO‐6wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐84
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐6:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforwesternpondturtleandmonitorconstructionactivitiesifturtlesareobserved
ImpactBIO‐6b:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforwesternpondturtle—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonponds,mixedwillowriparianscrub,andgrasslandthatmayprovidehabitatforwesternpondturtleareshowninTable3.4‐8.Impactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforwesternpondturtlecouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Becausethemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelines,suitableaquatichabitatwouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.
Aquaticandupland(overwintering,nesting)habitatforwesternpondturtlemayberemovedortemporarilydisturbedbyconstructionactivities.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofaquaticoruplandnestinghabitat.Westernpondturtlescouldalsobeinjuredorkilledifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsenterhabitat.Declinesinpopulationsofwesternpondturtlethroughoutthespecies’rangehavebeendocumented(JenningsandHayes1994).Lossofindividualsintheprojectareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthespecies.Thelossofuplandnestingsitesoreggswouldalsodecreasethelocalpopulation.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant,butimplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,andBIO‐6wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐6:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforwesternpondturtleandmonitorconstructionactivitiesifturtlesareobserved
ImpactBIO‐6c:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforwesternpondturtle—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceofthePattersonPassProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonponds,mixedwillowriparianscrub,andgrasslandthatmayprovidehabitatforwesternpondturtleareshowninTable3.4‐9.Impactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforwesternpondturtlecouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Becausethemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelines,suitableaquatichabitatwouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐85
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Aquaticandupland(overwintering,nesting)habitatforwesternpondturtlemayberemovedortemporarilydisturbedbyconstructionactivities.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofaquaticoruplandnestinghabitat.Westernpondturtlescouldalsobeinjuredorkilledifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsenterhabitat.Declinesinpopulationsofwesternpondturtlethroughoutthespecies’rangehavebeendocumented(JenningsandHayes1994).Lossofindividualsintheprojectareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthespecies.Thelossofuplandnestingsitesoreggswouldalsodecreasethelocalpopulation.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant,butimplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,andBIO‐6wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐6:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforwesternpondturtleandmonitorconstructionactivitiesifturtlesareobserved
ImpactBIO‐7a‐1:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,andSanJoaquincoachwhip—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ConstructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,andSanJoaquincoachwhiportheirhabitats(grassland,chaparral,oakwoodland,andscrub).Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrassland,chaparral,oakwoodland,andscrubthatmayprovidehabitatforthesespeciesareshowninTable3.4‐7.Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelinesandthatlossofchaparral,oakwoodland,andscrubhabitatwouldbeminimal.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofhabitat.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Blainville’shornedlizardhasdisappearedfromportionsofitsrangeandcontinuestobethreatenedbydevelopmentinotherportionsofitsrange(JenningsandHayes1994:132).Alamedawhipsnakeisstate‐andfederallylistedasthreatenedbecauseofhabitatlossandfragmentationresultingfromurbandevelopment(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2002b:69).SanJoaquincoachwhiphasarestrictedgeographicrangeandisthreatenedbycontinuedconversionofitshabitattocroplandandurbandevelopment(JenningsandHayes1994:164).Lossofindividualsintheprogramareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsofthesespeciesandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,andBIO‐7bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevelbyreducingthepotentialforinjuryandmortalityofindividuals,restoringdisturbedhabitat,andcompensatingforpermanenthabitatloss.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐86
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
WheresuitablehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,orSanJoaquincoachwhipisidentifiedinproposedworkareas,allprojectproponentswillensurethatBMPsandotherappropriatemeasures,inaccordancewithmeasuresdevelopedfortheEACCS,beincorporatedintotheappropriatedesignandconstructiondocuments.ImplementationofsomeofthesemeasureswillrequirethattheprojectproponentobtainincidentaltakepermitsfromUSFWSandCDFW(Alamedawhipsnake)beforeconstructionbegins.Additionalconservationmeasuresorconditionsofapprovalmayberequiredinapplicableprojectpermits(i.e.,ESAincidentaltakepermit).
Aqualifiedbiologistwillconductpreconstructionsurveysimmediatelypriortoground‐disturbingactivities(e.g.,equipmentstaging,vegetationremoval,grading)associatedwiththeprogram.IfanyBlainville’shornedlizards,Alamedawhipsnakes,orSanJoaquincoachwhipsarefound,workwillnotbeginuntiltheyaremovedoutoftheworkareatoaUSFWS‐and/orCDFW‐approvedrelocationsite.IncidentaltakepermitsfromUSFWSandCDFWarerequiredforrelocationofAlamedawhipsnake.RelocationofBlainville’shornedlizardandSanJoaquincoachwhiprequiresaletterfromCDFWauthorizingthisactivity.
Nomonofilamentplasticwillbeusedforerosioncontrol.
Whereapplicable,barrierfencingwillbeusedtoexcludeBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,andSanJoaquincoachwhip.Barrierfencingwillberemovedwithin72hoursofcompletionofwork.
Workcrewsoranonsitebiologicalmonitorwillinspectopentrenchesandpitsandunderconstructionequipmentandmaterialsleftonsiteforspecial‐statusreptileseachmorningandeveningduringconstruction.
Grounddisturbanceinsuitablehabitatwillbeminimized.
Vegetationwithintheproposedworkareawillberemovedpriortograding.Priortoclearingandgrubbingoperations,aqualifiedbiologistwillclearlymarkvegetationwithintheworkareathatwillbeavoided.Vegetationoutsidetheworkareawillnotberemoved.Wherepossiblehandtools(e.g.,trimmer,chainsaw)willbeusedtotrimorremovevegetation.Allvegetationremovalwillbemonitoredbythequalifiedbiologisttominimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusreptiles.
Ifspecial‐statusreptilesarefoundintheworkareaduringconstructionandcannotordonotmoveoffsiteontheirown,aqualifiedbiologistwhoisUSFWS‐and/orCDFW‐approved
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐87
October 2014ICF 00323.08
underanincidentaltakepermitforthespecificprojectwilltrapandmovetheanimal(s)toaUSFWSand/orCDFW‐approvedrelocationarea.IncidentaltakepermitsfromUSFWSandCDFWarerequiredforrelocationofAlamedawhipsnake.RelocationofBlainville’shornedlizardandSanJoaquincoachwhiprequiresaletterfromCDFWauthorizingthisactivity.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusreptiles
Whereimpactsonhabitatforspecial‐statusreptilescannotbeavoidedorminimized,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewithmitigationratiosandrequirementsdevelopedundertheEACCS(AppendixC).IntheeventthatincidentaltakepermitsarerequiredforAlamedawhipsnake,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewiththetermsofpermitsinconsultationwithUSFWSandCDFW.
ImpactBIO‐7a‐2:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,andSanJoaquincoachwhip—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.ConstructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,andSanJoaquincoachwhiportheirhabitats(grassland,chaparral,oakwoodland,andscrub).Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrassland,chaparral,oakwoodland,andscrubthatmayprovidehabitatforthesespeciesareshowninTable3.4‐7.Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelinesandthatlossofchaparral,oakwoodland,andscrubhabitatwouldbeminimal.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofhabitat.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Blainville’shornedlizardhasdisappearedfromportionsofitsrangeandcontinuestobethreatenedbydevelopmentinotherportionsofitsrange(JenningsandHayes1994:132).Alamedawhipsnakeisstate‐andfederallylistedasthreatenedbecauseofhabitatlossandfragmentationresultingfromurbandevelopment(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2002b:69).SanJoaquincoachwhiphasarestrictedgeographicrangeandisthreatenedbycontinuedconversionofitshabitattocroplandandurbandevelopment(JenningsandHayes1994:164).Lossofindividualsintheprogramareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsofthesespeciesandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,andBIO‐7bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevelbyreducingthepotentialforinjuryandmortalityofindividuals,restoringdisturbedhabitat,andcompensatingforpermanenthabitatloss.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐88
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusreptiles
ImpactBIO‐7b:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,andSanJoaquincoachwhip—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrassland,chaparral,oakwoodland,andscrubthatmayprovidehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,orSanJoaquincoachwhipareshowninTable3.4‐8.Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelinesandthatlossofchaparral,oakwoodland,andscrubhabitatwouldbeminimal.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofhabitat.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Lossofindividualsintheprojectareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsofthesespeciesandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact,butimplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,andBIO‐7bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusreptiles
ImpactBIO‐7c:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,andSanJoaquincoachwhip—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceofthePattersonPassProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.EstimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrasslandandmixedwillowriparianscrubthatmayprovidehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,orSanJoaquincoachwhipareshowninTable3.4‐9.Itisanticipatedthatthe
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐89
October 2014ICF 00323.08
majorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelinesandthatlossofmixedwillowriparianscrubhabitatwouldbeminimal.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofhabitat.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Lossofindividualsintheprojectareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsofthesespeciesandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,andBIO‐7bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusreptiles
ImpactBIO‐8a‐1:Potentialconstruction‐relateddisturbanceormortalityofspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitiesduringthenestingseason(generallyFebruary1–August31)ofwhite‐tailedkite,baldeagle,northernharrier,Swainson’shawk,goldeneagle,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike,andtricoloredblackbirdcouldresultindirecteffectsonthesespecies,aswellasonnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds,iftheyarenestingintheprogramarea.Suitablenestinghabitatmaybepresentinnearlyalllandcovertypesintheprogramarea.Removalofgrassland,burrows,wetlandandmarshvegetation,andtreesorshrubswithactivenestsandconstructiondisturbanceduringthebreedingseasonmayresultinnestabandonmentandsubsequentlossofeggsoryoung.Becausetheplacementofwindturbineswouldgenerallybeonthetopsofhillsandridgelinesintheprogramareawheretreesarenotgenerallypresent,thenumberoftreestoberemovedisexpectedtobeverylow.Exclusionofburrowingowlsfromtheirburrowsduringthenon‐nestingseasonaspartofeffortstoavoidorminimizesomeformsofdirecttakecouldresultinharmofburrowingowls.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitableforaginghabitat(grassland,cropland,alkalimeadowandscald,andwetlands)forspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐7.Suchlossescouldaffectthelocalpopulationofspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐8a,andBIO‐8bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐90
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusnestingbirds
Wheresuitablehabitatispresentforraptorswithin1mile(within2milesforgoldeneagles)andfortree/shrub‐andground‐nestingmigratorybirds(non‐raptors)within50feetofproposedworkareas,thefollowingmeasureswillbeimplementedtoensurethattheproposedprojectdoesnothaveasignificantimpactonnestingspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds.
Removesuitablenestinghabitat(shrubsandtrees)duringthenon‐breedingseason(typicallySeptember1–January31)fornestingbirds.
Totheextentfeasible,avoidconstructionactivitiesinornearsuitableoroccupiednestinghabitatduringthebreedingseasonofbirds(generallyFebruary1–August31).
Ifconstructionactivities(includingvegetationremoval,clearing,andgrading)willoccurduringthenestingseasonformigratorybirds,aqualifiedbiologistwillconductpreconstructionnestingbirdsurveyswithin7dayspriortoconstructionactivities.Theconstructionareaanda1‐milebufferwillbesurveyedfortree‐nestingraptors(exceptforgoldeneagles),anda50‐footbufferwillbesurveyedforallotherbirdspecies.
Surveystolocateeaglenestswithin2milesofconstructionwillbeconductedduringthebreedingseasonpriortoconstruction.A1‐mileno‐disturbancebufferwillbeimplementedforconstructionactivitiestoprotectnestingeaglesfromdisturbance.ThroughcoordinationwithUSFWS,theno‐disturbancebuffermaybereducedto0.5mileifconstructionactivitiesarenotwithinline‐of‐sightofthenest.
Ifanactivenest(otherthangoldeneagle)isidentifiednearaproposedworkareaandworkcannotbeconductedoutsidethenestingseason(February1–August31),ano‐activityzonewillbeestablishedaroundthenestbyaqualifiedbiologistincoordinationwithUSFWSand/orCDFW.Fencingand/orflaggingwillbeusedtodelineatetheno‐activityzone.Tominimizethepotentialtoaffectthereproductivesuccessofthenestingpair,theextentoftheno‐activityzonewillbebasedonthedistanceoftheactivitytothenest,thetypeandextentoftheproposedactivity,thedurationandtimingoftheactivity,thesensitivityandhabituationofthespecies,andthedissimilarityoftheproposedactivitytobackgroundactivities.Theno‐activityzonewillbelargeenoughtoavoidnestabandonmentandwillbebetween50feetand1milefromthenest,orasotherwiserequiredbyUSFWSand/orCDFW.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐91
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
Wheresuitablehabitatforwesternburrowingowlisinorwithin500feetofproposedworkareas,thefollowingmeasureswillbeimplementedtoavoidorminimizepotentialadverseimpactsonburrowingowls.
Tothemaximumextentfeasible(e.g.,wheretheconstructionfootprintcanbemodified),constructionactivitieswithin500feetofactiveburrowingowlburrowswillbeavoidedduringthenestingseason(February1–August31).
Aqualifiedbiologistwillconductpreconstructiontakeavoidancesurveysforburrowingowlnolessthan14dayspriortoandwithin24hoursofinitiatingground‐disturbingactivities.Thesurveyareawillencompasstheworkareaanda500‐footbufferaroundthisarea.
Ifanactiveburrowisidentifiednearaproposedworkareaandworkcannotbeconductedoutsidethenestingseason(February1–August31),ano‐activityzonewillbeestablishedbyaqualifiedbiologistincoordinationwithCDFW.Theno‐activityzonewillbelargeenoughtoavoidnestabandonmentandwillextendaminimumof250feetaroundtheburrow.
Ifburrowingowlsarepresentatthesiteduringthenon‐breedingseason(September1–January31),aqualifiedbiologistwillestablishano‐activityzonethatextendsaminimumof150feetaroundtheburrow.
Ifthedesignatedno‐activityzoneforeitherbreedingornon‐breedingburrowingowlscannotbeestablished,awildlifebiologistexperiencedinburrowingowlbehaviorwillevaluatesite‐specificconditionsand,incoordinationwithCDFW,recommendasmallerbuffer(ifpossible)and/orothermeasurethatstillminimizesdisturbanceoftheowls(whileallowingreproductivesuccessduringthebreedingseason).Thesite‐specificbuffer(and/orothermeasure)willconsiderthetypeandextentoftheproposedactivityoccurringneartheoccupiedburrow,thedurationandtimingoftheactivity,thesensitivityandhabituationoftheowls,andthedissimilarityoftheproposedactivitytobackgroundactivities.
Ifburrowingowlsarepresentinthedirectdisturbanceareaandcannotbeavoidedduringthenon‐breedingseason(generallySeptember1throughJanuary31),burrowingowlsmaybeexcludedfromburrowsthroughtheinstallationofone‐waydoorsatburrowentrances.Aburrowingowlexclusionplan,preparedbytheprojectproponent,mustbeapprovedbyCDFWpriortoexclusionofowls.One‐waydoors(e.g.,modifieddryerventsorotherCDFW‐approvedmethod)willbeleftinplaceforaminimumof1weekandmonitoreddailytoensurethattheowl(s)havelefttheburrow(s).Excavationoftheburrowwillbeconductedusinghandtools.Duringexcavationoftheburrow,asectionofflexibleplasticpipe(atleast3inchesindiameter)willbeinsertedintotheburrowtunneltomaintainanescaperouteforanyanimalsthatmaybeinsidetheburrow.Owlswillbeexcludedfromtheirburrowsasalastresortandonlyifotheravoidanceandminimizationmeasurescannotbeimplemented.
Avoiddestructionofunoccupiedburrowsoutsidetheworkareaandplacevisiblemarkersnearburrowstoensurethattheyarenotcollapsed.
Conductongoingsurveillanceoftheprojectsiteforburrowingowlsduringprojectactivities.Ifadditionalowlsareobservedusingburrowswithin500feetofconstruction,theonsitebiologicalmonitorwilldetermine,incoordinationwithCDFW,iftheowl(s)areorwouldbeaffectedbyconstructionactivitiesandifadditionalexclusionzonesarerequired.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐92
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactBIO‐8a‐2:Potentialconstruction‐relateddisturbanceormortalityofspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Constructionactivitiesduringthenestingseason(generallyFebruary1–August31)ofwhite‐tailedkite,baldeagle,northernharrier,Swainson’shawk,goldeneagle,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike,andtricoloredblackbirdcouldresultindirecteffectsonthesespecies,aswellasonnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds,iftheyarenestingintheprogramarea.Suitablenestinghabitatmaybepresentinnearlyalllandcovertypesintheprogramarea.Removalofgrassland,burrows,wetlandandmarshvegetation,andtreesorshrubswithactivenestsandconstructiondisturbanceduringthebreedingseasonmayresultinnestabandonmentandsubsequentlossofeggsoryoung.Becausetheplacementofwindturbineswouldgenerallybeonthetopsofhillsandridgelinesintheprogramareawheretreesarenotgenerallypresent,thenumberoftreestoberemovedisexpectedtobeverylow.Exclusionofburrowingowlsfromtheirburrowsduringthenon‐nestingseasonaspartofeffortstoavoidorminimizesomeformsofdirecttakecouldresultinharmofburrowingowls.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitableforaginghabitat(grassland,cropland,alkalimeadowandscald,andwetlands)forspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐7.Suchlossescouldaffectthelocalpopulationofspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐8a,andBIO‐8bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
ImpactBIO‐8b:Potentialconstruction‐relateddisturbanceormortalityofspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitiesduringthenestingseason(generallyFebruary1–August31)ofwhite‐tailedkite,baldeagle,northernharrier,Swainson’shawk,goldeneagle,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike,andtricoloredblackbirdcouldresultindirecteffectsonthesespecies,aswellasonnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds,iftheyarenestingintheprojectarea.Suitablenesting
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐93
October 2014ICF 00323.08
habitatmaybepresentinnearlyalllandcovertypesintheprojectarea.Removalofgrassland,burrows,wetlandandmarshvegetation,andtreesorshrubswithactivenestsandconstructiondisturbanceduringthebreedingseasonmayresultinnestabandonmentandsubsequentlossofeggsoryoung.Becausetheplacementofwindturbineswouldgenerallybeonthetopsofhillsandridgelinesintheprogramareawheretreesarenotgenerallypresent,thenumberoftreestoberemovedisexpectedtobeverylow.Exclusionofburrowingowlsfromtheirburrowsduringthenon‐nestingseasonaspartofeffortstoavoidorminimizesomeformsofdirecttakecouldresultinharmofburrowingowls.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitableforaginghabitat(grassland,cropland,alkalimeadowandscald,andwetlands)forspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐8.Suchlossescouldaffectthelocalpopulationofspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐8a,andBIO‐8bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon‐special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
ImpactBIO‐8c:Potentialconstruction‐relateddisturbanceormortalityofspecial‐statusandnon‐special‐statusmigratorybirds—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitiesduringthenestingseason(generallyFebruary1–August31)ofwhite‐tailedkite,northernharrier,Swainson’shawk,goldeneagle,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike,andtricoloredblackbirdcouldresultindirecteffectsonthesespecies,aswellasonnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds,iftheyarenestingintheprojectarea.Suitablenestinghabitatmaybepresentinnearlyalllandcovertypesintheprojectarea.Removalofgrassland,burrows,wetlandvegetation,andtreesorshrubswithactivenestsandconstructiondisturbanceduringthebreedingseasonmayresultinnestabandonmentandsubsequentlossofeggsoryoung.Becausetheplacementofwindturbineswouldgenerallybeonthetopsofhillsandridgelinesintheprogramareawheretreesarenotgenerallypresent,thenumberoftreestoberemovedisexpectedtobeverylow.Exclusionofburrowingowlsfromtheirburrowsduringthenon‐nestingseasonaspartofeffortstoavoidorminimizesomeformsofdirecttakecouldresultinharmofburrowingowls.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitableforaginghabitat(grassland,mixedwillowriparianscrub,andwetlands)forspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐9.Suchlossescouldaffectthelocalpopulationofspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds.This
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐94
October 2014ICF 00323.08
wouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐8a,andBIO‐8bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon‐special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
ImpactBIO‐9a‐1:Permanentandtemporarylossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowlandforaginghabitatfortricoloredblackbirdandotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Implementationoftheprogramwouldresultinthetemporaryandpermanentlossofgrasslandthatprovidessuitableforaginghabitatforburrowingowlandanumberofotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds.BecauseofthelimiteduseoftheprogramareabySwainson’shawksforforaging,nocompensationisproposedforthelossofforaginghabitatforSwainson’shawk.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitablegrasslandforaginghabitatforburrowingowl,tricoloredblackbird,andotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐7.Thelossofgrasslandforaginghabitatforspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdswouldbecompensatedthroughimplementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐5b(forspecial‐statusamphibians)and/orthroughthestandardizedmitigationratiosfornonlistedspeciesdevelopedfortheEACCS(AppendixC).
CDFWhasdeterminedthatcompensationisrequiredforpermanentlossofoccupiedburrowingowlhabitat(i.e.,whereburrowingowlshavebeendocumentedtooccupyburrowsinthepreceding3years).Permanentlossofoccupiedburrowingowlhabitatcouldaffectthelocalpopulationandwouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐5b,BIO‐5c,andBIO‐9wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐9:Compensateforthepermanentlossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowl
Ifconstructionactivitieswouldresultintheremovalofoccupiedburrowingowlhabitat(determinedduringpreconstructionsurveysdescribedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐8a),this
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐95
October 2014ICF 00323.08
habitatlosswillbemitigatedbypermanentlyprotectingmitigationlandthroughaconservationeasementorbyimplementingalternativemitigationdeterminedthroughconsultationwithCDFWasdescribedinitsStaffReportonBurrowingOwlMitigation(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2012:11–13).TheprojectproponentwillworkwithCDFWtodevelopthecompensationplan,whichwillbesubjecttoCountyreviewandapproval.
ImpactBIO‐9a‐2:Permanentandtemporarylossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowlandforaginghabitatfortricoloredblackbirdandotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Implementationoftheprogramwouldresultinthetemporaryandpermanentlossofgrasslandthatprovidessuitableforaginghabitatforburrowingowlandanumberofotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds.BecauseofthelimiteduseoftheprogramareabySwainson’shawksforforaging,nocompensationisproposedforthelossofforaginghabitatforSwainson’shawk.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitablegrasslandforaginghabitatforburrowingowl,tricoloredblackbird,andotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐7.Thelossofgrasslandforaginghabitatforspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdswouldbecompensatedthroughimplementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐5b(forspecial‐statusamphibians)and/orthroughthestandardizedmitigationratiosfornonlistedspeciesdevelopedfortheEACCS(AppendixC).
CDFWhasdeterminedthatcompensationisrequiredforpermanentlossofoccupiedburrowingowlhabitat(i.e.,whereburrowingowlshavebeendocumentedtooccupyburrowsinthepreceding3years).Permanentlossofoccupiedburrowingowlhabitatcouldaffectthelocalpopulationandwouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐5b,BIO‐5c,andBIO‐9wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐9:Compensateforthepermanentlossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowl
ImpactBIO‐9b:Permanentandtemporarylossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowlandforaginghabitatfortricoloredblackbirdandotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ConstructionoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldresultinthetemporaryandpermanentlossofgrasslandthatprovidessuitableforaginghabitatforburrowingowl,tricoloredblackbird,andanumberofotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitablegrasslandforaginghabitatforburrowingowl,tricoloredblackbird,andotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐8.Thelossofgrasslandforaginghabitatforspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdswouldbecompensatedthroughimplementationofMitigationMeasure5b(forspecial‐statusamphibians)and/orthroughthestandardizedmitigationratiosfornon‐listedspeciesdevelopedfortheEACCS(AppendixC).
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐96
October 2014ICF 00323.08
CDFWhasdeterminedthatcompensationisrequiredforpermanentlossofoccupiedburrowingowlhabitat(i.e.,whereburrowingowlshavebeendocumentedtooccupyburrowsinthepreceding3years).Permanentlossofoccupiedhabitatcouldaffectthelocalpopulationandwouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐5b,BIO‐5c,andBIO‐9wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐9:Compensateforthepermanentlossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowl
ImpactBIO‐9c:Permanentandtemporarylossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowlandforaginghabitatfortricoloredblackbirdandotherspecial‐statusandnon‐special‐statusbirds—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ConstructionofthePattersonPassProjectwouldresultinthetemporaryandpermanentlossofgrasslandthatprovidessuitableforaginghabitatforburrowingowl,tricoloredblackbird,andanumberofotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitablegrasslandforaginghabitatforburrowingowl,tricoloredblackbird,andotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐9.Thelossofgrasslandforaginghabitatforspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdswouldbecompensatedthroughimplementationofMitigationMeasure5b(forspecial‐statusamphibians)and/orthroughthestandardizedmitigationratiosfornon‐listedspeciesdevelopedfortheEACCS(AppendixC).
CDFWhasdeterminedthatcompensationisrequiredforpermanentlossofoccupiedburrowingowlhabitat(i.e.,whereburrowingowlshavebeendocumentedtooccupyburrowsinthepreceding3years).Permanentlossofoccupiedhabitatcouldaffectthelocalpopulationandwouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐5candBIO‐9wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐9:Compensateforthepermanentlossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowl
ImpactBIO‐10a‐1:PotentialinjuryormortalityofandlossofhabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ConstructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgerortheirgrasslandhabitat.EstimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrasslandthatprovidesuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgerareshowninTable3.4‐7.Inadditiontothepermanentandtemporaryremovalofhabitat,otherpotentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromconstructionvehiclesorheavyequipment,directmortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromdencollapseandsubsequentsuffocation,temporarydisturbancefromnoiseandhumanpresenceassociatedwithconstruction
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐97
October 2014ICF 00323.08
activities,andharassmentofindividualsbyconstructionpersonnel.Additionally,exposedpipes,largeexcavatedholes,ortrenchesthatareleftopenafterconstructionhasfinishedforthedaycouldentrapSanJoaquinkitfoxesorAmericanbadgers.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.SanJoaquinkitfoxisfederallylistedasendangeredandstate‐listedasthreatenedbecauseofhabitatlossresultingfromagriculturaldevelopment,infrastructureconstruction,andurbandevelopment(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2010:25).Americanbadgerhasexperienceddrasticdeclines,particularlyintheCentralValley,andhasbeenextirpatedfrommanyareasinsouthernCalifornia(Williams1986:66).Lossofindividualsintheprogramareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsofthesespeciesandreducereproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐10a,andBIO‐10bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
WheresuitablehabitatispresentforSanJoaquinfitfoxandAmericanbadgerinandadjacenttoproposedworkareas,thefollowingmeasures,consistentwithmeasuresdevelopedintheEACCS,willbeimplementedtoensurethatproposedprojectsdonothaveasignificantimpactonSanJoaquinkitfoxorAmericanbadger.ImplementationofsomeofthesemeasureswillrequirethattheprojectproponentobtainincidentaltakepermitsfromUSFWSandCDFW(SanJoaquinkitfox)beforeconstructionbegins.ImplementationofstateandfederalrequirementscontainedinsuchauthorizationmayconstitutecompliancewithcorrespondingmeasuresinthisPEIR..
Tothemaximumextentfeasible,suitabledensforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgerwillbeavoided.
Allprojectproponentswillretainqualifiedapprovedbiologists(asdeterminedbyUSFWS)toconductapreconstructionsurveyforpotentialSanJoaquinkitfoxdens(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2011).ResumesofbiologistswillbesubmittedtoUSFWSforreviewandapprovalpriortothestartofthesurvey.
PreconstructionsurveysforAmericanbadgerswillbeconductedinconjunctionwithSanJoaquinkitfoxpreconstructionsurveys.
AsdescribedinU.S.FishandWildlifeService2011,thepreconstructionsurveywillbeconductednolessthan14daysandnomorethan30daysbeforethebeginningofgrounddisturbance,oranyactivitylikelytoaffectSanJoaquinkitfox.ThebiologistswillconductdensearchesbysystematicallywalkingtransectsthroughtheprojectareaandabufferareatobedeterminedincoordinationwithUSFWSandCDFW.Transectdistanceshouldbebased
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐98
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ontheheightofvegetationsuchthat100%visualcoverageoftheprojectareaisachieved.Ifapotentialorknowndenisfoundduringthesurvey,thebiologistwillmeasurethesizeoftheden,evaluatetheshapeofthedenentrances,andnotetracks,scat,preyremains,andrecentexcavationsatthedensite.Thebiologistswillalsodeterminethestatusofthedensandmapthefeatures.DenswillbeclassifiedinoneofthefollowingfourdenstatuscategoriesdefinedbyUSFWS(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2011).
Potentialden:Anysubterraneanholewithinthespecies’rangethathasentrancesofappropriatedimensionsandforwhichavailableevidenceissufficienttoconcludethatitisbeingusedorhasbeenusedbyakitfox.Potentialdensinclude(1)anysuitablesubterraneanhole;or(2)anydenorburrowofanotherspecies(e.g.,coyote,badger,redfox,groundsquirrel)thatotherwisehasappropriatecharacteristicsforkitfoxuse;oranartificialstructurethatotherwisehasappropriatecharacteristicsforkitfoxuse.
Knownden:AnyexistingnaturaldenorartificialstructurethatisusedorhasbeenusedatanytimeinthepastbyaSanJoaquinkitfox.Evidenceofusemayincludehistoricalrecords;pastorcurrentradiotelemetryorspotlightingdata;kitfoxsignsuchastracks,scat,and/orpreyremains;orotherreasonableproofthatagivendenisbeingorhasbeenusedbyakitfox(USFWSdiscouragesuseofthetermsactiveandinactivewhenreferringtoanykitfoxdenbecauseagreatpercentageofoccupieddensshownoevidenceofuse,andbecausekitfoxeschangedensoften,withtheresultthatthestatusofagivendenmaychangefrequentlyandabruptly).
Knownnatalorpuppingden:Anydenthatisused,orhasbeenusedatanytimeinthepast,bykitfoxestowhelpand/orreartheirpups.Natal/puppingdensmaybelargerwithmorenumerousentrancesthandensoccupiedexclusivelybyadults.Thesedenstypicallyhavemorekitfoxtracks,scat,andpreyremainsinthevicinityoftheden,andmayhaveabroaderapronofmatteddirtorvegetationatoneormoreentrances.Anatalden,definedasadeninwhichkitfoxpupsareactuallywhelpedbutnotnecessarilyreared,isamorerestrictiveversionofthepuppingden.Inpractice,however,itisdifficulttodistinguishbetweenthetwo;therefore,forpurposesofthisdefinitioneithertermapplies.
Knownatypicalden:AnyartificialstructurethathasbeenorisbeingoccupiedbyaSanJoaquinkitfox.Atypicaldensmayincludepipes,culverts,anddiggingsbeneathconcreteslabsandbuildings.
WrittenresultsofthesurveyincludingthelocationsofanypotentialorknownSanJoaquinkitfoxdenswillbesubmittedtoUSFWSwithin5daysfollowingcompletionofthesurveyandpriortothestartofgrounddisturbanceorconstructionactivities.
Afterpreconstructiondensearchesandbeforethecommencementofrepoweringactivities,exclusionzoneswillbeestablishedasmeasuredinaradiusoutwardfromtheentranceorclusterofentrancesofeachden.Repoweringactivitieswillbeprohibitedorgreatlyrestrictedwithintheseexclusionzones.Onlyessentialvehicularoperationonexistingroadsandfoottrafficwillbepermitted.Allotherrepoweringactivities,vehicleoperation,materialandequipmentstorage,andothersurface‐disturbingactivitieswillbeprohibitedintheexclusionzones.Barrierfencingwillberemovedwithin72hoursofcompletionofwork.Exclusionzoneswillbeestablishedusingthefollowingparameters.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐99
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Potentialandatypicaldens:Atotaloffourorfiveflaggedstakeswillbeplaced50feetfromthedenentrancetoidentifythedenlocation.
Knownden:Orangeconstructionbarrierfencingwillbeinstalledbetweentheworkareaandtheknowndensiteataminimumdistanceof100feetfromtheden.Thefencingwillbemaintaineduntilconstruction‐relateddisturbanceshaveceased.Atthattime,allfencingwillberemovedtoavoidattractingsubsequentattentiontotheden.
Natal/puppingden:USFWSwillbecontactedimmediatelyifanatalorpuppingdenisdiscoveredinorwithin200feetoftheworkarea.
AnyoccupiedorpotentiallyoccupiedbadgerdenwillbeavoidedbyestablishinganexclusionzoneconsistentwithaSanJoaquinkitfoxpotentialburrow(i.e.,fourorfiveflaggedstakeswillbeplaced50feetfromthedenentrance).
Incaseswhereavoidanceisnotareasonablealternative,limiteddestructionofpotentialSanJoaquinkitfoxdensmaybeallowedasfollows.
Natal/puppingdens:NatalorpuppingdensthatareoccupiedwillnotbedestroyeduntiltheadultsandpupshavevacatedthedensandthenonlyafterconsultationwithUSFWS.Removalofnatal/puppingdensrequiresincidentaltakeauthorizationfromUSFWSandCDFW.
Knowndens:Knowndenswithinthefootprintoftheactivitymustbemonitoredfor3dayswithtrackingmediumoraninfraredcameratodeterminecurrentuse.Ifnokitfoxactivityisobservedduringthisperiod,thedenshouldbedestroyedimmediatelytoprecludesubsequentuse.Ifkitfoxactivityisobservedduringthisperiod,thedenwillbemonitoredforatleast5consecutivedaysfromthetimeofobservationtoallowanyresidentanimaltomovetoanotherdenduringitsnormalactivity.Useofthedencanbediscouragedbypartiallypluggingitsentrance(s)withsoilinsuchamannerthatanyresidentanimalcanescapeeasily.Onlywhenthedenisdeterminedtobeunoccupiedwillthedenbeexcavatedunderthedirectionofabiologist.Ifthefoxisstillpresentafter5ormoreconsecutivedaysofmonitoring,thedenmaybeexcavatedwhen,inthejudgmentofthebiologist,itistemporarilyvacant,suchasduringthefox’snormalforagingactivities.RemovalofknowndensrequiresincidentaltakeauthorizationfromUSFWSandCDFW.
Potentialdens:Ifincidentaltakepermitshavebeenreceived(fromUSFWSandCDFW),potentialdenscanberemoved(preferablybyhandexcavation)bybiologistorunderthesupervisionofabiologistwithoutmonitoring,unlessotherrestrictionswereissuedwiththeincidentaltakepermits.Ifnotakeauthorizationshavebeenissued,thepotentialdenswillbemonitoredasiftheyareknowndens.Ifanydenwasconsideredapotentialdenbutwaslaterdeterminedduringmonitoringordestructiontobecurrentlyorpreviouslyusedbykitfoxes(e.g.,kitfoxsignisfoundinside),thenallconstructionactivitieswillceaseandUSFWSandCDFWwillbenotifiedimmediately.
Nighttimeworkwillbeminimizedtotheextentpossible.Thevehicularspeedlimitwillbereducedto10milesperhourduringnighttimework.
Pipes,culverts,andsimilarmaterialsgreaterthan4inchesindiameterwillbestoredsoastopreventwildlifespeciesfromusingtheseastemporaryrefuges,andthesematerialswillbeinspectedeachmorningforthepresenceofanimalspriortobeingmoved.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐100
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Arepresentativeappointedbytheprojectproponentwillbethecontactforanyemployeeorcontractorwhomightinadvertentlykillorinjureakitfoxorwhofindsadead,injured,orentrappedkitfox.Therepresentativewillbeidentifiedduringenvironmentalsensitivitytraining(MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b)andhis/hernameandphonenumberwillbeprovidedtoUSFWSandCDFW.Uponsuchincidentorfinding,therepresentativewillimmediatelycontactUSFWSandCDFW.
TheSacramentoUSFWSofficeandCDFWwillbenotifiedinwritingwithin3workingdaysoftheaccidentaldeathorinjuryofaSanJoaquinkitfoxduringproject‐relatedactivities.Notificationmustincludethedate,time,andlocationoftheincident,andanyotherpertinentinformation.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10b:CompensateforlossofsuitablehabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
WherepermanentimpactsonhabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgercannotbeavoidedorminimized,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewithmitigationratiosandrequirementsdevelopedundertheEACCS(AppendixC).IntheeventthatincidentaltakepermitsarerequiredforSanJoaquinkitfox,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewiththetermsofpermitsinconsultationwithUSFWSandCDFW.
ImpactBIO‐10a‐2:PotentialinjuryormortalityofandlossofhabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.ConstructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgerortheirgrasslandhabitat.EstimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrasslandthatprovidesuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgerareshowninTable3.4‐7.Inadditiontothepermanentandtemporaryremovalofhabitat,otherpotentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromconstructionvehiclesorheavyequipment,directmortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromdencollapseandsubsequentsuffocation,temporarydisturbancefromnoiseandhumanpresenceassociatedwithconstructionactivities,andharassmentofindividualsbyconstructionpersonnel.Additionally,exposedpipes,largeexcavatedholes,ortrenchesthatareleftopenafterconstructionhasfinishedforthedaycouldentrapSanJoaquinkitfoxesorAmericanbadgers.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.SanJoaquinkitfoxisfederallylistedasendangeredandstate‐listedasthreatenedbecauseofhabitatlossresultingfromagriculturaldevelopment,infrastructureconstruction,andurbandevelopment(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2010:25).Americanbadgerhasexperienceddrasticdeclines,particularlyintheCentralValley,andhasbeenextirpatedfrommanyareasinsouthernCalifornia(Williams1986:66).Lossofindividualsintheprogramareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsofthesespeciesandreducereproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐10a,andBIO‐10bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐101
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10b:CompensateforlossofsuitablehabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
ImpactBIO‐10b:PotentialinjuryormortalityofandlossofhabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.EstimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrasslandthatprovidesuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgerareshowninTable3.4‐8.Inadditiontothepermanentandtemporaryremovalofhabitat,otherdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromconstructionvehiclesorheavyequipment,directmortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromdencollapseandsubsequentsuffocation,temporarydisturbancefromnoiseandhumanpresenceassociatedwithconstructionactivities,andharassmentofindividualsbyconstructionpersonnel.Additionally,exposedpipes,largeexcavatedholes,ortrenchesthatareleftopenafterconstructionhasfinishedforthedaycouldentrapSanJoaquinkitfoxesorAmericanbadgers.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Lossofindividualsintheprojectareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsand/orlowerthereproductivepotentialofSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐10a,andBIO‐10bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐102
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10b:CompensateforlossofsuitablehabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
ImpactBIO‐10c:PotentialinjuryormortalityofandlossofhabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceofthePattersonPassProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.EstimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrasslandthatprovidesuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgerareshowninTable3.4‐9.Inadditiontothepermanentandtemporaryremovalofhabitat,otherdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromconstructionvehiclesorheavyequipment,directmortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromdencollapseandsubsequentsuffocation,temporarydisturbancefromnoiseandhumanpresenceassociatedwithconstructionactivities,andharassmentofindividualsbyconstructionpersonnel.Additionally,exposedpipes,largeexcavatedholes,ortrenchesthatareleftopenafterconstructionhasfinishedforthedaycouldentrapSanJoaquinkitfoxesorAmericanbadgers.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Lossofindividualsintheprojectareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsand/orlowerthereproductivepotentialofSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐10a,andBIO‐10bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10b:CompensateforlossofsuitablehabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
ImpactBIO‐11a‐1:Avianmortalityresultingfrominteractionwithwindenergyfacilities—programAlternative1:417MW(significantandunavoidable)
Theoperationofwindenergyfacilitieshasbeenshowntocauseavianfatalitiesthroughcollisionswithwindturbinesandpowerlinesandthroughelectrocutiononpowerlines.
Mostcollectionlinesforfirst‐andsecond‐generationturbinesareabovegroundfacilities.Asrepoweringprojectsareimplemented,oldcollectionsystemswouldberemovedandnewcollectionsystemswouldbeinstalled.Themajorityofnewcollectionlinesassociatedwiththeprogramwouldbeundergrounded,reducingtheriskofavianfatalityfromelectrocutionorcollisionwithpowerlines.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐103
October 2014ICF 00323.08
DiabloWinds,BuenaVista,andVascoWindsaretheonlyrepoweredprojectsintheAPWRAforwhichestimatesofavianfatalityratesareavailable.Basedontheseestimates,aviancollisionriskisexpectedtobesubstantiallyreducedwhenolder‐generationturbinesarereplacedbynewer,largerturbineswiththesametotalratednameplatecapacity(Table3.4‐10).However,whiletheavailableevidencesuggeststhatrepoweringcouldsubstantiallyreduceturbine‐relatedavianfatalitiesbelowthelevelsdocumentedforoldergenerationturbines,avianfatalitieswouldcontinuetooccur.Moreover,whilerepoweringisintendedtoreducefatalities,enoughuncertaintyremainsinlightofproject‐andsite‐specificdatatowarrantaconservativeapproachintheimpactanalysis.Accordingly,thecontinuedorincreasedlossofbirds(includingspecial‐statusspecies)atarateexceedingthebaselineratewouldbeasignificantadverseimpact.Thereisalsoevidencethattherepoweringprogramwouldresultincontinuedavianmortalityinconflictwithspecificlawsandregulations(e.g.,ESA,CESA,MBTA)thatarenotbasedonmortalityrates,asdescribedaboveinDeterminationofSignificance,andwiththeobjectivesofthe2007SettlementAgreementthatboundthewindenergyoperatorsandtheCountytoprovidestrategiesandmeasurestoconserveavianspeciesofconcernandtheirhabitats.Thisconflictisconsideredasignificantimpactonprotectedandspecial‐statusavianspecies,andadoptingaconservativeexpectationthatsomelevelofavianmortalitywillcontinueevenwiththeimplementationofeveryfeasiblemitigationmeasureandconservationstrategy,thiswouldbeasignificantandunavoidableimpact.
ItshouldbenotedthatturbinesusedinfuturerepoweringprojectsarelikelytobeofsimilarsizetotheVascoWindsturbinesbutmuchlargerthantheDiabloWindsandBuenaVistaturbinesinbothoverallsizeandratednameplatecapacity.Thereisevidencetosuggestthatlargerturbines—likethoseusedintheVascoWindsproject—couldresultinadditionaldecreasesinavianfatalityratesforbirdspeciescurrentlykilledintheAPWRA(SmallwoodandKaras2009).However,itisalsopossiblethatlargerturbinesmaynegativelyaffectadifferentsuiteofbirdspeciesthathavebeenrelativelyunaffectedbyolder(i.e.,smaller)turbines.Inaddition,fatalityratesintheAPWRAarehighlyvariable(thatis,becausetheydifferacrossyears,turbinestypes,geographies,andtopographies,speciesimpactsmaydifferbetweensitesduetodifferentlevelsofuse)andpotentiallyimprecise(Smallwoodetal2010.;ICFInternational2013).Nonetheless,thesethreerepoweringprojectsrepresentthebestavailableinformationtounderstandthepotentialforavianfatalitiesassociatedwithrepowering;accordingly,datafromtheseprojectswereusedtoformthebasisforavianfatalityestimates.TheestimatedchangesassociatedwithAlternative1areshowninTable3.4‐11anddiscussedbelow.Postconstructionmonitoring,oncetheturbinesareinoperation,willprovidedatatoquantifytheactualextentofchangeinavianfatalitiesfromrepoweringandtheextentofavianfatalityforprojectsintheprogramarea,andwillcontributetothebodyofknowledgesupportingfutureanalyses.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐104
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.4‐11. Estimated Annual Avian Fatalities for Existing and Repowered Program Area—Alternative 1 (417 MW)
Species
EstimatedAnnualFatalitiesforProgramArea
Nonrepowered
Repowered
AverageAnnualFatalities
DiabloWindsa
BuenaVistab
VascoWindsc,d
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
Americankestrel 194.2 37.5 81 62.6 75 123.8 36
Barnowl 79.5 8.3 90 0.0 100 13.8 83
Burrowingowl 255.1 350.3 ‐37 0.0 100 20.9 92
Goldeneagle 26.6 4.2 84 16.7 44 13.3 50
Loggerheadshrike 61.8 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Prairiefalcon 6.6 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Red‐tailedhawk 144.5 83.4 42 41.7 71 102.6 29
Swainson’shawk 0.5 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Allraptors 799.9 504.6 37 129.3 84 267.7 67
Allnativenon‐raptors 1,482.0 1,046.7 29 421.2 81 873.2 41
Note:fatalityratesreflectannualfatalities(95%confidenceinterval).a DiabloWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.b BuenaVistafatalityratesextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.c VascoWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.dVascoWindsfatalityrateforgoldeneaglebasedonupdatedinformationreceivedfromNextEraEnergyResourcesonJuly21,2014,andextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.
AmericanKestrel.AsshowninTable3.4‐11,afullyrepowered417MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated38–124Americankestrelfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualfatalitiesby36–81%.
TheNorthAmericanpopulationofAmericankestrelsisestimatedatmorethan4,000,000birds,representing75%oftheglobalpopulation.PopulationshavedeclinedoverthewesternU.S.sincethe1980s,pronouncedlysosincethe1990s(HawkMountain2007).ThistrendisalsoapparentforCalifornia’sfoothillandCentralValleypopulations(Saueretal.2008).NorthAmericanBreedingBirdSurvey(BBS)dataindicateadeclineinAmericankestrelsforCoastalCaliforniaandthestateasawhole(Saueretal.2011),asdoChristmasBirdCountdataforCalifornia(NationalAudubonSociety2011).
BasedontheestimatedannualfatalitiesinTable3.4.11,adverseeffectsonAmericankestrelfromwindturbineswouldsubstantiallydecreasewithrepoweringintheprogramarea.Inaddition,MitigationMeasuresBIO‐11candBIO‐11fwillfurtherlimitpreyavailabilityandreducethenumberofpotentialperchsitesintheprogramarea,potentiallyreducingtheexposureofAmericankestrelstoturbinehazards.Furthermore,therotor‐sweptareaofrepoweredturbineswouldbehigheroffthegroundthanthatofexistingturbines,potentiallyreducingtherisktokestrels,astheyaregenerallyperchandpouncepredators,perchinglowerinhigherwindspeeds(SmallwoodandBird2002).ConsideringthatAmericankestrelfatalitiesarelikelytosubstantiallydeclinewithrepowering(Smallwoodetal.2009;Smallwood2010;ICFInternational2012),repoweringtheprogramareaisunlikelytohaveadverseimpactsonAmericankestrelsatthepopulationlevel.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐105
October 2014ICF 00323.08
BarnOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐11,afullyrepowered417MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated8–14barnowlfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualfatalitiesby83–90%.
BarnowlsarecommoninCaliforniawithastablepopulationinthestate(AudubonCalifornia2010).AlthoughBBSresultsmayindicateadecliningpopulationinthestate,thedataareoflimitedcreditabilityduetosamplingdeficiencies(Saueretal.2011).BarnowlsareusedthroughoutCaliforniaforrodentcontrolinorchardsandvineyards(BarnOwlBoxCompany2012).Itisuncertainwhattheeffectofrepoweringtheprogramareawouldhaveonlocalbarnowlpopulations.Thehigherrotor‐sweptareaofrepoweredturbinesmayreducetheriskofturbinecollision,asmosthuntingisdoneinlowquarteringflightsatabout1.5–4.5meters(5–15feet)abovetheground(Martietal.2005).MitigationMeasureBIO‐11cwouldalsoreducetheperchavailabilityintheprogramarea.Itisunclearwhattheeffectsoftheestimated8–14turbine‐relatedfatalitiesofbarnowlsperyearwouldhaveonthelocalpopulation,butthespecies’relativeabundanceinthestatewouldindicatethatfatalitiesasaresultofrepoweringwouldbeunlikelytohaveadverseimpactsonthespeciesatthepopulationlevel.
BurrowingOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐11,afullyrepowered417MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated30–350burrowingowlfatalitiesperyear—achangerangingfroma92%decreasetoa37%increaseinfatalities.ThisfatalityestimateisbasedondatafromDiabloWindsandVascoWindsbecausenoburrowingowlfatalitiesweredetectedatBuenaVista.Currentevidencesuggeststhatburrowingowlfatalityratesarenotreducedbythetransitionfromold‐tonew‐generationturbinestothesameextentasthefatalityratesofotherspecies.Theincreaseinenergyproductionfrom329MWto417MWwouldlikelyresultinasmallestimatedincreaseinburrowingowlfatalitiesperyear.
FocusedsurveysinContraCostaCountyin2006on3.3squaremilesand2007on4.4squaremilesintheAPWRAfound56pairsand67pairs,respectively(BarclayandHarman2008unpublisheddata),suggestingthattheAPWRAcouldsupportseveralhundredpairsofburrowingowlsdistributedinclusters.Smallwoodetal.’s(2012)surveysin2011and2012estimatedapproximately500–600breedingpairs,rangingindensityfrom0toapproximately28breedingpairspersquarekilometer.SincethisspecieshasbeenextirpatedfrommuchoftheSanFranciscoBayArea,itisbelievedthattheAPWRAmaysupportthelargestnumberofbreedingpairsintheBayArea(BarclayandHarman2008unpublisheddata).StudiesofburrowingowlsintheAPWRAhavesuggestedthatturbine‐relatedmortalitiesmayloweradultandjuvenilesurvivorshipsufficientlysuchthatthelocalpopulationisnotself‐sustaininginsomeyears(Smallwoodetal.2008),butrecentsurveysindicatethatburrowingowlabundanceintheAPWRAmaybemuchgreaterthanpreviouslyestimated(Smallwoodetal.2012).Agrowingbodyofcircumstantialevidenceindicatesthatmanyoftheburrowingowlfatalitiesfoundduringfatalitysurveysareduetopredationratherthanturbinecollision.Becauseofthisconfoundingeffect,thepotentialreductioninturbine‐relatedburrowingowlfatalitiesmaybeunderestimatedbecauseoftheinabilitytodistinguishfatalitiesresultingfrompredationfromthosecausedbyturbinecollision(ICFInternational2013).
GoldenEagle.AsshowninTable3.4‐11,afullyrepowered417MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated4–17goldeneaglefatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualfatalitiesby44–84%.
PortionsoftheDiabloRangeinsouthernAlamedaCountyandeasternContraCostaCountysupportsomeofthehighestknowndensitiesofgoldeneaglenestingterritoriesintheworld(HuntandHunt
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐106
October 2014ICF 00323.08
2006).Inthepast15years,severalcomprehensivestudies,discussedbelow,estimatedterritoryoccupancy(numberofbreedingpairs);assessedreproductiverates;andmonitoredjuvenile,subadult,andfloater2rangeandmortality.
Hunt(2002)examineddatacollecteddataovera7‐yearperiodbetween1994and2002thatincludedthemonitoringof60–70activeterritorieswithin30km(11.6miles)oftheAPWRA.In2005,theseterritorieswerefoundtostillbe100%occupied(HuntandHunt2006).Theconclusionsofthesestudieswerethatthegoldeneaglepopulationremainsstable(Hunt2002;HuntandHunt2006).Inaddition,thestudiesfoundnoincreaseinthenumberofactivelybreedingsubadults,indicatingthatthereareenoughfloaterstobufferanylossofbreedingadults(Hunt2002;HuntandHunt2006).TheconclusionofastablegoldeneaglepopulationintheAPWRAvicinityissupportedbytheresultsofapopulationdynamicsmodelthatusedreproductionratesandfatalityrates,amongothervariables(Hunt2002).However,themodelresultsalsosuggestedthatthenumberofestimatedannualfatalitiesusedinthemodel,50individuals,couldnotbesustainedbythenumberofbreedingadultswhenconsideringthelossofreproductivepotentialincurredbyeacheaglefatality(HuntandHunt2006).AlthoughthevacantterritoriesarefilledbyfloatersandsubadultstostabilizetheAPWRApopulation,becausethepopulationdemandsaflowofrecruitsfromoutsidetheareatofillbreedingvacanciesastheyoccur,theAPWRAcanbeconsideredapopulationsink.Theresearchersconclude,therefore,thatturbine‐relatedmortalityreducestheresilienceofthelocalgoldeneaglepopulation.
Table3.4.11showsanestimated4–17fatalitiesperyearinafullyrepoweredprogramarea,orbetween8and36%ofthe50fatalitiesestimatedfortheHunt(2002)model.Itisnotpossibletodeterminetheproportionofthesefatalitiesthatwouldconsistofindividualsfromthelocalpopulation.However,theseannualfatalityestimates,whencomparedtocurrentconditions,wouldindicatethatrepoweringtheprogramareawouldreducegoldeneaglefatalitiesandincreasethepotentialforrestoringaself‐sustaininglocalbreedingpopulation.Theimplementationofmitigationmeasuresdescribedbelow—includingMitigationMeasureBIO‐11e,whichwouldrequirethatexistingpowerlinesassociatedwithraptorstrikesberetrofittedtoberaptor‐safe—wouldfurtherreducegoldeneaglefatalitiesintheprogramarea.
LoggerheadShrike.NodocumentedfatalitiesofloggerheadshrikeshaveoccurredattheDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWindsprojects(Table3.4‐10),althoughloggerheadshrikesareregularlydetectedinthevicinityoftheDiabloWindsturbines.Thelackofdocumentedfatalitiesmaysuggestareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesatthesesites.
AccordingtoShufordandGardali(2008),loggerheadshrikewasanabundantresidentintheSanFranciscoBayregionintheearlytwentiethcentury.However,birdshavebeenextirpatedlocallyorreducedinnumbersbyhabitatloss(ShufordandGardali2008).BBSdataforCalifornia’sshrikepopulationshowanegativetrendfrom1968to2010(Saueretal.2011).Giventhelackofdocumentedfatalitiesatrepoweredfacilitiesintheprogramarea,itisdifficulttoquantifytheeffectsofafullyrepoweredprogramareaontheregionalloggerheadshrikepopulation.MinimizingavailableperchesthroughMitigationMeasureBIO‐11candincreasingtheheightoftherotor‐sweptareaofrepoweredturbinesmayreducetheriskofturbinecollisionsforshrikes,astheymostlytakepreyontheground(Yosef1996).Carefulmonitoringoffatalitiesandimplementingmonitoring
2Ajuvenileis3–15monthsofage,asubadultis1–3yearsofage,andafloaterisanonbreeding,nonterritorialadultindividualmorethan4yearsofage(Hunt2002).
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐107
October 2014ICF 00323.08
protocolsthatarelikelytodetectloggerheadshrikefatalitieswillbeimportantforunderstandingimpactsonthisspeciesandimplementingadaptivemanagementmeasures,asappropriate.
PrairieFalcon.FatalityestimatesatrepoweredsitesarenotavailableforprairiefalconbecausenofatalitieshavebeendocumentedatDiabloWindsorVascoWindsandonlyonefatalityhasbeenrecordedatBuenaVista(Table3.4‐10).Consequently,itisdifficulttoestimatetheannualfatalitiesthatwouldresultfromafullyrepoweredprogramarea.Thelackofdocumentedfatalitiesmaysuggestareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesatthesesites.However,thenonrepoweredfatalityrateforprairiefalconisalreadyrelativelylow(0.02fatality/MW/year),suggestingthatthecollisionriskforthisspeciesislow.Prairiefalconsarepresentmostlyinwinter,andthebaselinefatalityrateismeasuredduringaperiodwhentheseasonalshutdownhasbeenineffect.Repoweredturbinesarenotanticipatedtoshutdowninwinter.
AcrossNorthAmerica,theprairiefalconpopulationisstablebutexperiencinglocaldeclines;inCalifornia,thespeciesisvulnerabletoextirpation(NatureServe2012).Withintheprogramareaanditsvicinity,thespeciesissomewhatrare,withlessthanthreeyearlysightingsintheregionduringsummerBBScountsfrom2006to2010(Saueretal.2011).State‐wide,however,BBStrendsmayindicateanincreaseinabundance,althoughthedataareoflimitedvalueduetothesmallsamplesize(Saueretal.2011).Giventhelackofdocumentedfatalitiesatrepoweredfacilitiesintheprogramarea,itisdifficulttoquantifytheeffectsofafullyrepoweredprogramareaontheregionalprairiefalconpopulation.Prairiefalconsuseavarietyofforagingflightcharacteristics,includinghighsoaring,makingitdifficulttohypothesizehowrepoweredturbinesmayaffecttheriskofturbinecollision.Carefulmonitoringoffatalitiesandimplementingmonitoringprotocolsthatarelikelytodetectprairiefalconfatalitieswillbeimportantforunderstandingimpactsonthisspeciesandimplementingadaptivemanagementmeasures,asappropriate.
Red‐TailedHawk.AsshowninTable3.4‐11,thefullyrepowered417MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated42–103red‐tailedhawkfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreasetheaverageannualfatalitiesby29–71%.
Anestimated89%oftheglobalpopulationofred‐tailedhawks(approximately1,960,000breedingbirds)isfoundinNorthAmerica(HawkMountain2007).PopulationshaveremainedstableorincreasedthroughoutmostofthewesternUnitedStatessincethe1980s,growing1.5%inCaliforniabetween1983and2005(HawkMountain2007;Saueretal.2008).Californiafoothillpopulationshaveremainedstablesince1968,whiletheCentralValleypopulationhassignificantlyincreased(Saueretal.2008).
Althoughasubstantialnumberofred‐tailedhawkfatalitiesoccurintheAPWRA,theannualfatalitieshaveshownagenerallydecreasingtrendsince2005,althoughnotastatisticallysignificantdecline(ICFInternational2012)andarepredictedtocontinuetodeclineasrepoweringproceedsintheAPWRA(Smallwood2010;ICFInternational2012).Theyearlyfatalitiesforred‐tailedhawkspresentedinTable3.4.11coincidewiththeseotherstudies,suggestingthatrepoweringtheprogramareaislikelytocontinuetoreducethenumberofred‐tailedhawkskilledeachyear.Consideringthatthered‐tailedhawkpopulationinCaliforniahasgrownwhiletheAPWRAhasbeeninoperation,continuedoperationofrepoweredturbinesintheprogramareaisunlikelytohaveanypopulation‐levelimpactsonred‐tailedhawk.
Swainson’sHawk.OnlyoneSwainson’shawkfatalityhasbeenrecordedintheAPWRA,yieldinganannualestimatedfatalityrateofapproximatelyzero(Table3.4‐10).NoSwainson’shawkfatalitiesweredetectedatDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWinds.Basedonthelowestimatedfatality
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐108
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ratefromnonrepoweredsites,thelackoffatalitiesdetectedatrepoweredsites,andtherelativelylowuseoftheAPWRAbySwainson’shawks,itisexpectedthatthefatalityrateforSwainson’shawkwouldremainlowundertheprogram.
Swainson’shawkisoneoftwo(theotherissandhillcrane)state‐listedspeciesthathasarecordedfatalityintheAPWRA(ICFInternational2012).Whiletheprogramareadoesnotprovidehigh‐valuenestingorforaginghabitatfortheSwainson’shawk,neighboringagriculturalareasinthenortheasternmostcornerofAlamedaCountyandnorthoftheAPWRAinContraCostaCountydoprovideprimeforaginghabitat,andSwainson’shawkmaycrossintotheprogramareaoccasionally.TheAudubonSociety(2007)includesSwainson’shawkonitsWatchListasadecliningorrarespeciesofnationalconservationconcern.EvidencefromeggcollectionssuggeststhattheCaliforniapopulationhasbeenreducedbyasmuchas90%fromitsestimatedhistoricallevels(Bloom1980).ThisseverepopulationdeclineintheCentralValleyofCaliforniaiscorroboratedbymicrosatelliteanalysesofDNAthatsuggestthatthedeclinehastakenplaceover68–75generations,orabout200years,correspondingwiththetimeofEuropeansettlement(AudubonSociety2007;Hulletal.2008).BasedonmigrationcountsinVeraCruz,Mexico,thepresentglobalpopulationmayapproach1millionindividuals(HawkWatchInternational2009).TheCaliforniapopulationisestimatedatmore1,900nestingpairs,95%ofwhichareintheCentralValley(Andersonetal.2007).TheBBSreportsarisingCaliforniapopulationsincesurveysbeganin1968,butalsoreportsthatimportantdeficienciesintheunderlyingdatamaymakethesetrendsinaccurate(Saueretal.2011).
TheverysmallnumberofestimatedfatalitiesintheprogramareacomparedtothesizeofthelocalpopulationeastoftheprogramareaintheCentralValleyindicatesthatturbine‐relatedfatalitiesintheprogramareaareunlikelytohaveanadverseeffectonthelocalSwainson’shawkpopulation.Theimplementationofsubsequentproject‐levelavianuseandfatalitystudiesdescribedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11gwillcontinuetoprovidedataforassessingtheeffectofturbineoperationontheSwainson’shawkpopulationinthearea.
Raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐11,afullyrepowered417MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated129–505raptorfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualraptorfatalitiesby37–84%.
Nativenon‐raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐11,afullyrepowered417MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated421–1,047nativenon‐raptorfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreasetheaverageannualfatalitiesby29–81%.
Asdescribedabove,forallavianspeciesanalyzed,afullyrepoweredprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoreduceestimatedfatalityrates.However,fatalitieswouldstillbeexpectedtoresultfromtheoperationoftherepoweredturbines,anduncertaintysurroundingtheaccuracyoftheestimatedfatalityratesandthetypesofspeciespotentiallyaffectedremains.Consideringthisinformation,anddespitetheanticipatedreductionsinavianimpactscomparedtothebaselinerates,theCountyhasdeterminedtouseaconservativeapproachfortheimpactassessment,concludingthatturbine‐relatedfatalitiescouldconstituteasubstantialadverseeffectonavianspeciesbecausetheratesforsomeorallofthespeciescouldbegreaterthanthebaselinerates.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐11athroughBIO‐11iwouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.Thesemeasures,whichindividualprojectproponentswouldberequiredtocarryoutasappropriateinlightofproject‐specificconditions,werederivedfromtheEACCS,basedonestablishedpractice,ordevelopedinthecontextoftheprogram’sconservationobjectives.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐109
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11a:Prepareaproject‐specificavianprotectionplan
Allprojectproponentswillprepareaproject‐specificAPPtospecifymeasuresandprotocolsconsistentwiththeprogram‐levelmitigationmeasuresthataddressavianmortality.Theproject‐specificAPPswillinclude,ataminimum,thefollowingcomponents.
Informationandmethodsusedtositeturbinestominimizerisk.
Documentationthatappropriateturbinedesignsarebeingused.
Documentationthatavian‐safepracticesarebeingimplementedonprojectinfrastructure.
Methodsusedtodiscouragepreyforraptors.
Adetaileddescriptionofthepostconstructionavianfatalitymonitoringmethodstobeused(consistentwiththeminimumrequirementsoutlinedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11g).
Methodsusedtocompensateforthelossofraptors(consistentwiththerequirementsofMitigationMeasureBIO‐11h).
Eachprojectapplicantwillprepareandsubmitadraftproject‐specificAPPtotheCounty.ThedraftAPPwillbereviewedbytheTACforconsistencyandtheinclusionofappropriatemitigationmeasuresthatareconsistentwiththePEIRandrecommendedforapprovalbytheCounty.EachprojectapplicantmusthaveanapprovedFinalAPPpriortocommercialoperation.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
Sitingofturbines—usinganalysesoflandscapefeaturesandlocation‐specificbirduseandbehaviordatatoidentifylocationswithreducedcollisionrisk—mayresultinreducedfatalities(Smallwoodetal.2009).Allprojectproponentswillconductasitingprocessandprepareasitinganalysistoselectturbinelocationstominimizepotentialimpactsonbirdandbatspecies.Proponentswillutilizeexistingdataaswellascollectnewsite‐specificdataaspartofthesitinganalysis.
ProjectproponentswillutilizecurrentlyavailableguidelinessuchastheAlamedaCountySRCguidelinesforsitingwindturbines(AlamedaCountySRC2010)and/orothercurrentlyavailableresearchorguidelinestoconductsitinganalysis.Additionally,projectproponentswillusetheresultsofprevioussitingeffortstoinformtheanalysisandsitingmethodsasappropriatesuchthatthescienceofsitingcontinuestobeadvanced.Allprojectproponentswillcollectfielddatathatidentifyorconfirmthebehavior,utilization,anddistributionpatternsofaffectedavianandbatspeciespriortotheinstallationofturbines.Projectproponentswillcollectandutilizeavailableexistinginformation,includingbutnotnecessarilylimitedto:sitingreportsandmonitoringdatafrompreviouslyinstalledprojects;publisheduseandabundancestudiesandreports;andtopographicfeaturesknowntoincreasecollisionrisk(trees,riparianareas,waterbodies,andwetlands).
Projectproponentswillalsocollectandutilizeadditionalfielddataasnecessarytoinformthesitinganalysisforgoldeneagle.AsrequiredinMitigationMeasureBIO‐8a,surveyswillbeconductedtolocategoldeneaglenestswithin2milesofproposedprojectareas.Sitingofturbineswithin2milesofanactiveoralternativegoldeneaglenestoractivegoldeneagleterritorywillbebasedonasite‐specificanalysisofriskbasedontheestimatedeagleterritories,conductedinconsultationwithUSFWS.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐110
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Projectproponentswillutilizemethods(i.e.,computermodels)toidentifydangerouslocationsforbirdsandbatsbasedonsite‐specificriskfactorsinformedbytheinformationdiscussedabove.Theprojectproponentswillcompiletheresultsofthesitinganalysesforeachturbineanddocumenttheseintheproject‐levelAPP,alongwiththespecificlocationofeachturbine.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
Useofturbineswithcertaincharacteristicsisbelievedtoreducethecollisionriskforavianspecies.Projectproponentswillimplementthedesign‐relatedmeasureslistedbelow.
Turbinedesignswillbeselectedthathavebeenshownorthataresuspectedtoreduceavianfatalities,basedontheheight,color,configuration,orotherfeaturesoftheturbines.
Turbinedesignwilllimitoreliminateperchingopportunities.Designswillincludeatubulartowerwithinternalladders;externalcatwalks,railings,orladderswillbeprohibited.
Turbinedesignwilllimitoreliminatenestingorroostingopportunities.Openingsonturbineswillbecoveredtopreventcavity‐nestingspeciesfromnestingintheturbines.
LightingwillbeinstalledonthefewestnumberofturbinesallowedbyFAAregulations,andallpilotwarninglightswillfiresynchronously.Turbinelightingwillemployonlyredordualred‐and‐whitestrobe,strobe‐like,orflashinglights(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2012).Alllightingonturbineswillbeoperatedattheminimumallowableintensity,flashingfrequency,andquantityallowedbyFAA(Gehringetal.2009;U.S.FishandWildlifeService2012).DurationbetweenflasheswillbethelongestallowablebytheFAA.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
Allprojectproponentswillapplythefollowingmeasureswhendesigningandsitingturbine‐relatedinfrastructure.Thesemeasureswillreducetheriskofbirdelectrocutionandcollision.
Permanentmeteorologicalstationswillavoiduseofguywires.Ifitisnotpossibletoavoidusingguywires,thewireswillbeatleast4/0gaugetoensurevisibilityandwillbefittedwithbirddeterrentdevices.
AllpermanentmeteorologicaltowerswillbeunlitunlesslightingisrequiredbyFAA.Iflightingisrequired,itwillbeoperatedattheminimumallowableintensity,flashingfrequency,andquantityallowedbyFAA.
Totheextentpossible,allpowerlineswillbeplacedunderground.However,linesmaybeplacedabovegroundimmediatelypriortoenteringthesubstation.Allabovegroundlineswillbefittedwithbirdflightdivertersorvisibilityenhancementdevices(e.g.,spiraldampingdevices).Whenlinescannotbeplacedunderground,appropriateavianprotectiondesignsmustbeemployed.Asaminimumrequirement,thecollectionsystemwillconformwiththemostcurrenteditionoftheAvianPowerLineInteractionCommitteeguidelinestopreventelectrocutions.
Lightingwillbefocuseddownwardandminimizedtolimitskywardillumination.Sodiumvaporlampsandspotlightswillnotbeusedatanyfacility(e.g.,laydownareas,substations)exceptwhenemergencymaintenanceisneeded.Lightingatcollectionfacilities,includingsubstations,willbeminimizedusingdowncastlightingandmotion‐detectiondevices.Theuseofhigh‐intensitylighting;steady‐burningorbrightlightssuchassodiumvapor,quartz,
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐111
October 2014ICF 00323.08
orhalogen;orotherbrightspotlightswillbeminimized.Wherelightingisrequireditwillbedesignedfortheminimumintensityrequiredforsafeoperationofthefacility.Greenorbluelightingwillbeusedinplaceofredorwhitelighting.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
Anyexistingpowerlinesinaspecificprojectareathatareownedbythewindprojectoperatorandthatareassociatedwithelectrocutionofaneagleorotherraptorwillberetrofittedwithin30daystomakethemraptor‐safeaccordingtoAvianPowerLineInteractionCommitteeguidelines.Allotherexistingstructurestoremaininaprojectareaduringrepoweringwillberetrofitted,asfeasible,accordingtospecificationsofMitigationMeasureBIO‐11cpriortorepoweredturbineoperation.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11f:Discouragepreyforraptors
Allprojectproponentswillapplythefollowingmeasureswhendesigningandsitingturbine‐relatedinfrastructure.Thesemeasuresareintendedtominimizeopportunitiesforfossorialmammalstobecomeestablishedandtherebycreateapreybasethatcouldbecomeanattractantforraptors.
Rodenticidewillnotbeutilizedontheprojectsitetoavoidtheriskofraptorsscavengingtheremainsofpoisonedanimals.
Boulders(rocksmorethan12inchesindiameter)excavatedduringprojectconstructionmaybeplacedinabovegroundpilesintheprojectareasolongastheyaremorethan500meters(1,640feet)fromanyturbine.Existingrockpilescreatedduringconstructionoffirst‐andsecond‐generationturbineswillalsobemovedatleast500meters(1,640feet)fromturbines.
Gravelwillbeplacedaroundeachtowerfoundationtodiscouragesmallmammalsfromburrowingnearturbines.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11g:Implementpostconstructionavianfatalitymonitoringforallrepoweringprojects
Apostconstructionmonitoringprogramwillbeconductedateachrepoweringprojectforaminimumof3yearsbeginningonthecommercialoperationdate(COD)oftheproject.Monitoringmaycontinuebeyond3yearsifconstructioniscompletedinphases.Moreover,iftheresultsofthefirst3yearsindicatethatbaselinefatalityrates(i.e.,nonrepoweredfatalityrates)areexceeded,monitoringwillbeextendeduntiltheaverageannualfatalityratehasdroppedbelowbaselinefatalityratesfor2years,andtoassesstheeffectivenessofadaptivemanagementmeasuresspecifiedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11i.Anadditional2yearsofmonitoringwillbeimplementedatyear10(i.e.,thetenthanniversaryoftheCOD).ProjectproponentswillprovideaccesstoqualifiedthirdpartiesauthorizedbytheCountytoconductanyadditionalmonitoringaftertheinitial3‐yearmonitoringperiodhasexpiredandbeforeandaftertheadditional2‐yearmonitoringperiod,providedthatsuchadditionalmonitoringutilizesscientificallyvalidmonitoringprotocols.
Atechnicaladvisorycommittee(TAC)willbeformedtooverseethemonitoringprogramandtoadvisetheCountyonadaptivemanagementmeasuresthatmaybenecessaryiffatalityratessubstantiallyexceedthosepredictedfortheproject(asdescribedbelowinMitigationMeasure
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐112
October 2014ICF 00323.08
BIO‐11i).TheTACwillhaveastandingmeeting,whichwillbeopentothepublic,every6monthstoreviewmonitoringreportsproducedbyoperatorsintheprogramarea.Inthesemeetings,theTACwilldiscussanyissuesraisedbythemonitoringreportsandrecommendtotheCountynextstepstoaddressissues,includingschedulingadditionalmeetings,ifnecessary.
TheTACwillcompriserepresentativesfromtheCounty(includingoneormoretechnicalconsultants,suchasabiostatistician,anavianbiologist,andabatbiologist),andwildlifeagencies(CDFW,USFWS).AdditionalTACmembersmayalsobeconsidered(e.g.,arepresentativefromAudubon,alandownerintheprogramarea,arepresentativeoftheoperators)atthediscretionoftheCounty.TheTACwillbeavoluntaryandadvisorygroupthatwillprovideguidancetotheCountyPlanningDepartment.Tomaintaintransparencywiththepublic,allTACmeetingswillbeopentothepublic,andnoticeofmeetingswillbegiventointerestedparties.
TheTACwillhavethreeprimaryadvisoryroles:(1)toreviewandadviseonprojectplanningdocuments(i.e.,project‐specificAPPs)toensurethatproject‐specificmitigationmeasuresandcompensatorymitigationmeasuresdescribedinthisPEIRareappropriatelyandconsistentlyapplied,(2)toreviewandadviseonmonitoringdocuments(protocolsandreporting)forconsistencywiththemitigationmeasures,and(3)toreviewandadviseonimplementationoftheadaptivemanagementplans.
ShouldfatalitymonitoringrevealthatimpactsexceedthebaselinethresholdsestablishedinthisPEIR,theTACwilladvisetheCountyonrequiringimplementationofadaptivemanagementmeasuresasdescribedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11i.TheCountywillhavethedecision‐makingauthority,asitistheorganizationissuingtheCUPs.However,theTACwillcollaborativelyinformthedecisionsoftheCounty.
Operatorsarerequiredtoprovideforavianusesurveystobeconductedwithintheprojectareaboundariesforaminimumof30minutesduration.SurveyorswillbequalifiedandtrainedandsubjecttoapprovalbytheCounty.
Carcasssurveyswillbeconductedateveryturbineforprojectswith20orfewerturbines.Forprojectswithmorethan20turbines,suchsurveyswillberequiredataminimumof20turbines,andasampleoftheremainingturbinesmaybeselectedforcarcasssearches.Theoperatorwillberequiredtodemonstratethatthesamplingschemeandsamplesizearestatisticallyrigorousanddefensible.Wheresubstantialvariationinterrain,landcovertype,management,orotherfactorsmaycontributetosignificantvariationinfatalityrates,thesamplingschemewillbestratifiedtoaccountforsuchvariation.Thesurveyprotocolforsetsandsubsetsofturbines,aswellasproposedsamplingschemesthatdonotentailasearchofallturbines,mustbeapprovedbytheCountyinconsultationwiththeTACpriortothestartofsurveys.
Thesearchintervalwillnotexceed14daysfortheminimumof20turbinestobesurveyed;however,thesearchintervalfortheadditionalturbines(i.e.,thoseexceedingthe20‐turbineminimum)thataretobeincludedinthesamplingschememaybeextendedupto28daysorlongerifrecommendedbytheTAC.
Theestimationofdetectionprobabilityisarapidlyadvancingfield.Carcassplacementtrials,broadlydefined,willbeconductedtoestimatedetectionprobabilityduringeachyearofmonitoring.Samplesizeswillbelargeenoughtopotentiallydetectsignificantvariationbyseason,carcasssize,andhabitattype.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐113
October 2014ICF 00323.08
OperatorswillberequiredtosubmitcopiesofallrawdataformstotheCountyannually,willsupplyrawdatainareadilyaccessibledigitalformattobespecifiedbytheCounty,andwillpreparerawdataforinclusionasappendicesintheannualreports.TheintentistoallowtheCountytoconductindependentanalysesandmeta‐analysesofdataacrosstheAPWRA,andtosupplythesedatatotheregulatoryagenciesifrequested.
AnnualreportssubmittedtotheCountywillprovideasynthesisofallinformationcollectedtodate.Eachreportwillprovideanintroduction;descriptionsofthestudyarea,methods,andresults;adiscussionoftheresults;andanysuitablerecommendations.Reportswillproviderawcountsoffatalities,adjustedfatalityrates,andestimatesofproject‐widefatalitiesonbothaperMWandperturbinebasis.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11h:Compensateforthelossofraptorsandotheravianspecies,includinggoldeneagles,bycontributingtoconservationefforts
Discussion
Severaloptionstocompensateforimpactsonraptorsarecurrentlyavailable.Somearetargetedtobenefitcertainspecies,buttheymayalsohavebenefitsforotherraptorandnon‐raptorspecies.Forexample,USFWS’sECPGuidelinescurrentlyoutlineacompensatorymitigationstrategyforgoldeneaglesusingtheretrofitofhigh‐riskpowerpoles(polesknownorsuspectedtoelectrocuteandkilleagles).Thegoalofthisstrategyistoeliminatehazardsforgoldeneagles.However,becausethepolesarealsodangerousforotherlargeraptors(e.g.,red‐tailedhawk,Swainson’shawk),retrofittingthemcanbenefitsuchspeciesaswellaseagles.
Similarly,althoughtheretrofittingofelectricalpolesmayhavebenefitsforlargeraptors,suchanapproachmayprovideminimalbenefitsforsmallerraptorssuchasAmericankestrelandburrowingowl.Consequently,additionalmeasureswouldberequiredcomponentsofanoverallmitigationpackagetocompensateforimpactsonraptorsingeneral.
TheSecretaryoftheInteriorissuedOrder3330onOctober31,2013,outlininganewapproachtomitigationpoliciesandpracticesoftheDepartmentoftheInterior.Thisapproachrecognizesthatcertainstrategiesaimedatsomespecies(e.g.,raptors)canprovidesubstantialbenefittoothers(e.g.,non‐raptors)andtotheecologicallandscapeasawhole.Thelandscape‐scaleapproachtomitigationandconservationeffortsisnowcentraltotheDepartment’smitigationstrategy.AlthoughtheOrderwasintendedforusebyfederalagenciesandassuchisnotdirectlyapplicabletotheCounty,itisevidentthatsuchanapproachwouldlikelyhavethegreatestmitigationbenefits,especiallywhenconsideringongoingandlong‐termimpactsfromwindenergyprojects.
Withtheseconsiderationsinmind,theCountyhasoutlinedseveraloptionsthatarecurrentlyavailabletocompensateforimpactsonraptorsandotheravianspecies.Theoptionsdiscussedbelowarecurrentlyconsideredacceptableapproachestocompensationforimpactsonraptorsandotherspecies.Althoughnoteveryoptionisappropriateforallspecies,itishopedthatastimeproceeds,amorecomprehensivelandscape‐levelapproachtomitigationwillbeadoptedtobenefitabroadersuiteofspeciesthanmightbenefitfrommorespecies‐specificmeasures.TheCountyrecognizesthatthescienceofraptorconservationandtheunderstandingofwind‐wildlifeimpactsarecontinuingtoevolveandthatthesuiteofavailablecompensationoptionsmayconsequentlychangeoverthelifeoftheproposedprojects.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐114
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Conservation Measures
Topromotetheconservationofraptorsandotheravianspecies,projectproponentswillcompensateforraptorfatalitiesestimatedwithintheirprojectareas.Mitigationwillbeprovidedin10‐yearincrements,withthefirstincrementbasedontheestimates(raptors/MW/year)providedinthisPEIRfortheVascoWindsProject(Table3.4‐10)ortheproject‐specificEIRforfutureprojects.TheVascoWindsfatalityrateswereselectedbecausetheVascoturbinesarethemostsimilartothoselikelytobeproposedforfuturerepoweringprojectsandconsequentlyrepresentthebestavailablefatalityestimates.Eachprojectproponentwillconductpostcon‐structionfatalitymonitoringforatleast3yearsbeginningatprojectstartup(dateofcommercialoperation)andagainfor2yearsatyear10,asrequiredunderMitigationMeasureBIO‐11g,toestimatetheaveragenumberofraptorstakeneachyearbyeachindividualproject.Theprojectproponentwillcompensateforthisnumberofraptorsinsubsequent10‐yearincrementsforthelifeoftheproject(i.e.,three10‐yearincrements)asoutlinedbelow.MitigationMeasureBIO‐11galsorequiresadditionalfatalitymonitoringatyear10oftheproject.Theresultsofthefirst3yearsofmonitoringand/orthemonitoringatyear10mayleadtorevisionsoftheestimatedaveragenumberofraptorstaken,andmitigationprovidedmaybeadjustedaccordinglyonaone‐timebasiswithineachofthefirsttwo10‐yearincrements,basedontheresultsofthemonitoringrequiredbyMitigationMeasureBIO‐11g,inconsultationwiththeTAC.
Priortothestartofoperations,projectproponentswillsubmitforCountyapprovalanavianconservationstrategy,aspartoftheproject‐specificAPPoutlinedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11a,outliningtheestimatednumberofraptorfatalitiesbasedonthenumberandtypeofturbinesbeingconstructed,andthetypeortypesofcompensationoptionstobeimplemented.Projectproponentswillusetheavianconservationstrategytocraftanappropriatestrategyusingabalancedmixoftheoptionspresentedbelow,aswellasconsideringnewoptionssuggestedbythegrowingbodyofknowledgeduringthecourseoftheprojectlifespan,assupportedbyaResourceEquivalencyAnalysis(REA)(seeexampleinAppendixC)orsimilartypeofcompensationassessmentacceptabletotheCountythatdemonstratestheefficacyofproposedmitigationforimpactsonraptors.
TheCountyPlanningDirector,inconsultationwiththeTAC,willconsider,basedontheREA,whethertheproposedavianconservationstrategyisadequate,includingconsiderationofwhethereachavianmitigationplanincorporatesalandscape‐scaleapproachsuchthattheconservationeffortsachievethegreatestpossiblebenefits.Compensationmeasuresasdetailedinanapprovedavianconservationstrategymustbeimplementedwithin1yearofthedateofcommercialoperations.AvianconservationstrategieswillbereviewedandmayberevisedbytheCountyevery10years,andonaone‐timebasisineachofthetwo10‐yearincrementsbasedonthemonitoringrequiredbyMitigationMeasureBIO‐11g.
Retrofittinghigh‐riskelectricalinfrastructure.USFWS’sECPGuidelinesoutlineacompensatorymitigationstrategyusingtheretrofitofhigh‐riskpowerpoles(polesknownorsuspectedtoelectrocuteandkilleagles).USFWShasdevelopedanREA(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2013a)asatooltoestimatethecompensatorymitigation(numberofretrofits)requiredforthetakeofeagles.TheREAtakesintoaccountthecurrentunderstandingofeaglelifehistoryfactors,theeffectivenessofretrofittingpoles,theexpectedannualtake,andthetimingofimplementationofthepoleretrofits.Theprojectproponentsmayneedtocontractwithautilityorathird‐partymitigationaccount(suchastheNationalFishandWildlifeFoundation)toretrofitthenumberofpolesneededas
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐115
October 2014ICF 00323.08
demonstratedbyaproject‐specificREA.Ifcontractingdirectly,theprojectproponentwillconsultwithutilitycompaniestoensurethathigh‐riskpoleshavebeenidentifiedforretrofitting.Proponentswillagreeinwritingtopaytheutilityowner/operatortoretrofittherequirednumberofpowerpolesandmaintaintheretrofitsfor10yearsandwillprovidetheCountywithdocumentationoftheretrofitagreement.Thefirstretrofitswillbebasedontheestimatednumberofeaglefatalitiesasdescribedaboveinthismeasureorasdevelopedintheproject‐specificEIRforfutureprojects.Subsequentnumbersofretrofitsrequiredforadditional10‐yeardurationswillbebasedontheresultsofproject‐specificfatalitymonitoringasoutlinedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11g.Iffewereaglefatalitiesareidentifiedthroughthemonitoring,thenumberoffuturerequiredretrofitsmaybereducedthroughaproject‐specificREA.Althoughretrofittingpoleshasnotbeenidentifiedasappropriatemitigationforotherlargeraptors,theywouldlikelybenefitfromsuchefforts,asthey(particularlyred‐tailedandSwainson’shawks)constitutethelargestnon‐eaglegrouptosufferelectrocutiononpowerlines(AvianPowerLineInteractionCommittee2006).
MeasuresoutlinedinanapprovedEagleConservationPlanandBirdandBatConservationStrategy.ProjectproponentsmayelecttoapplyforprogrammaticeagletakepermitsfromUSFWS.TheprogrammaticeagletakepermitprocesscurrentlyinvolvespreparationofanECPandaBirdandBatConservationStrategy(BBCS).TheECPspecifiesavoidanceandminimizationmeasures,advancedconservationpractices,andcompensatorymitigationforeagles—conditionsthatmeetUSFWS’scriteriaforissuanceofapermit.TheBBCSoutlinesmeasuresbeingimplementedbytheapplicanttoavoidandminimizeimpactsonmigratorybirds,includingraptors.Ifprogrammaticeagletakepermitsareobtainedbyprojectproponents,thosepermitterms,includingthemeasuresoutlinedintheapprovedECPandBBCS,mayconstituteanappropriateconservationmeasureforestimatedtakeofgoldeneaglesandotherraptors,providedsuchtermsaredeemedbytheCountytobecomparabletoormoreprotectiveofraptorsthantheotheroptionslistedherein.
Contributetoraptorconservationefforts.Projectproponentswillcontributefunds,intheamountof$580/raptorfatality,in10‐yearincrementstolocaland/orregionalconservationeffortsdesignedtoprotect,recover,andmanagelandsforraptors,ortoconductresearchinvolvingmethodstoreduceraptorfatalitiesorincreaseraptorproductivity.The$580amountisbasedontheaveragecosttorehabilitateoneraptorattheCaliforniaRaptorCenter,affiliatedwiththeUCDavisSchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,whichreceivesmorethan200injuredorillraptorsannually(Stedmanpers.comm.).Ten‐yearinstallmentsaremoreadvantageousthanmorefrequentinstallmentsforplanningandbudgetingpurposes.
Thefundswillbecontributedtoanentityorentitiesengagedintheseactivities,suchastheEastBayRegionalParkDistrictandtheLivermoreAreaRegionalParkDistrict.Conservationeffortsmayincludeconstructingandinstallingnestboxesandperches,conductinganawarenesscampaigntoreducetheuseofrodenticide,andconductingresearchtobenefitraptors.ThespecificconservationefforttobepursuedwillbesubmittedtotheCountyforapprovalaspartoftheavianconservationstrategyreviewprocess.ThedonationreceiptwillbeprovidedtotheCountyasevidenceofpayment.
Thefirstcontributionsforanygivenprojectwillbebasedontheestimatednumberofraptorfatalitiesasdescribedaboveinthismeasureorasdevelopedintheproject‐specificEIRforfutureprojects.Fundsforsubsequent10‐yearinstallmentswillbeprovidedonthebasisoftheaverageannualraptorfatalityratesdeterminedthroughpostconstruction
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐116
October 2014ICF 00323.08
monitoringefforts,allowingforaone‐timeadjustmentwithineach10‐yearincrementaftertheresultsofthemonitoringeffortsareavailable.Iffewerraptorfatalitiesaredetectedthroughthemonitoringeffort,thesecondinstallmentamountmaybereducedtoaccountforthedifferencebetweenthefirstestimatednumbersandthemonitoringresults.
Contributetoregionalconservationofraptorhabitat.ProjectproponentsmayaddressregionalconservationofraptorhabitatbyfundingtheacquisitionofconservationeasementswithintheAPWRAoronlandsinthesameeco‐regionoutsidetheAPWRA,subjecttoCountyapproval,forthepurposeoflong‐termregionalconservationofraptorhabitat.Landsproposedforconservationmustbewell‐managedgrazinglandssimilartothoseonwhichtheprojectshavebeendeveloped.Projectproponentswillfundtheregionalconservationandimprovementoflands(throughhabitatenhancement,leadabatementactivities,eliminationofrodenticides,and/orothermeasures)usinganumberofacresequivalenttotheconservationbenefitoftheraptorrecoveryandconservationeffortsdescribedabove,orasdeterminedthroughaproject‐specificREA(seeexampleREAinAppendixC).Theconservationlandsmustbeprovidedforcompensationofaminimumof10yearsofraptorfatalities,as10‐yearincrementswillminimizethetransactioncostsassociatedwiththeidentificationandconservationoflands,therebyincreasingoverallcosteffectiveness.Theconservationeasementswillbeheldbyanorganizationwhosemissionistopurchaseand/orotherwiseconservelands,suchasTheTrustforPublicLands,TheNatureConservancy,CaliforniaRangelandTrust,ortheEastBayRegionalParksDistrict.TheprojectproponentswillobtainapprovalfromtheCountyregardingtheamountofconservedlands,anyenhancementsproposedtoincreaseraptorhabitatvalue,andtheentityholdingthelandsand/orconservationeasement.
OtherConservationMeasuresIdentifiedintheFuture.Asnotedabove,additionalconservationmeasuresforraptorsmaybecomeavailableinthefuture.ConservationmeasuresforraptorsarecurrentlybeingdevelopedbyUSFWSandnongovernmentalorganizations(e.g.,AmericanWindWildlifeInstitute)—forexample,activitiesservingtoreducesuchfatalitieselsewhere,andenhancingforagingandnestinghabitat.Additionaloptionsforconservationcouldincludepurchasingcreditsatanapprovedmitigationbank,creditsfortheretirementofwindfarmsthatareparticularlydangeroustobirdsorbats,thecurtailmentofpreyeliminationprograms,andhunter‐educationprogramsthatremovesourcesofleadfromtheenvironment.Underthisoption,theprojectproponentmaymakealternativeproposalstotheCountyforconservationmeasures—basedonanREAorsimilarcompensationassessment—thattheCountymayacceptasmitigationiftheyaredeemedbytheCountytobecomparabletoormoreprotectiveofraptorspeciesthantheotheroptionsdescribedherein.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
IffatalitymonitoringdescribedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11gresultsinanestimatethatexceedsthepreconstructionbaselinefatalityestimates(i.e.,estimatesatthenonrepoweredturbinesasdescribedinthisPEIR)foranyfocalspeciesorspeciesgroup(i.e.,individualfocalspecies,allfocalspecies,allraptors,allnon‐raptors,allbirdscombined),projectproponentswillprepareaproject‐specificadaptivemanagementplanwithin2monthsfollowingtheavailabilityofthefatalitymonitoringresults.Theseplanswillbeusedtoadjustoperationandmitigationtotheresultsofmonitoring,newtechnology,andnewresearchtoensurethatthebestavailablescienceisusedtominimizeimpactstobelowbaseline.Project‐specificadaptivemanagement
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐117
October 2014ICF 00323.08
planswillbereviewedbytheTAC,revisedbyprojectproponentsasnecessary,andapprovedbytheCounty.TheTACwilltakecurrentresearchandthemosteffectiveimpactreductionstrategiesintoaccountwhenreviewingadaptivemanagementplansandsuggestingmeasurestoreduceimpacts.Theproject‐specificadaptivemanagementplanswillbeimplementedwithin2monthsofapprovalbytheCounty.Theplanswillincludeasteppedapproachwherebyanadaptivemeasureormeasuresareimplemented,theresultsaremonitoredforsuccessorfailureforayear,andadditionaladaptivemeasuresareaddedasnecessary,followedbyanotheryearofmonitoring,untilthesuccesscriteriaareachieved(i.e.,estimatedfatalitiesarebelowthebaseline).Projectproponentsshouldusethebestmeasuresavailablewhentheplanispreparedinconsiderationofthespecificadaptivemanagementneeds.Forexample,ifonlyonethresholdisexceeded,suchasgoldeneaglefatalities,theplanandmeasuresusedwilltargetthatspecies.AssetforthinotheragreementsintheAPWRA,projectproponentsmayalsofocusadaptivemanagementmeasuresonindividualormultipleturbinesifthoseturbinesareshowntocauseasignificantlydisproportionatenumberoffatalities.
Ingeneral,thefollowingtypesofmeasureswillbeconsideredbytheTAC,intheordertheyarepresentedbelow;however,theTACmayrecommendanyoftheseorothermeasuresthatareshowntobesuccessfulinreducingtheimpact.
ADMM‐1:VisualModifications.Theprojectproponentcouldpaintapatternonaproportionoftheturbineblades.TheproportionandthepatternofthebladestobepaintedwillbedeterminedbytheCountyinconsultationwiththeTAC.USFWSrecommendstestingmeasurestoreducemotionsmear—theblurringofturbinebladesduetorapidrotationthatrendersthemlessvisibleandhencemoreperiloustobirdsinflight.Suggestedtechniquesincludepaintingbladeswithstaggeredstripesorpaintingonebladeblack.Theprojectproponentwillconductfatalitystudiesonacontrollednumberofpaintedandunpaintedturbines.TheprojectproponentwillcoordinatewiththeTACtodeterminethelocationofthepaintedturbines,buttheintentistoimplementthismeasureinareasthatappeartobecontributingmosttothehighnumberoffatalitiesdetected.
ADMM‐2:Anti‐PerchingMeasures.TheCountywillconsultwiththeTACregardingtheuseofanti‐perchingmeasurestodiscouragebirduseofthearea.TheTACwillusethemostrecentresearchandinformationavailabletodetermine,onacase‐by–casebasis,ifanti‐perchingmeasureswillbeaneffectivestrategytoreduceimpacts.Ifdeterminedtobefeasible,anti‐perchingdeviceswillbeinstalledonartificialstructures,excludingutilitypoles,within1mileofprojectfacilities(withlandownerpermission)todiscouragebirduseofthearea.
ADMM‐3:PreyReduction.Theprojectproponentwillimplementapreyreductionprogramaroundthemosthazardousturbines.Examplesofpreyreductionmeasuresmayincludechangesingrazingpracticestomakethearealessdesirableforpreyspecies,activereductionthroughdirectremovalofpreyspecies,orothermeasuresprovidedtheyareconsistentwithmanagementgoalsforthreatenedandendangeredspecies.
ADMM‐4:ImplementationofExperimentalTechnologies.Projectproponentscandeployexperimentaltechnologiesattheirfacilitiestotesttheirefficacyinreducingturbine‐relatedfatalities.Examplesmayinclude,butarenotlimitedto,visualdeterrents,noisedeterrents,andactiveradarsystems.
ADMM‐5:TurbineCurtailment.Ifpostconstructionmonitoringindicatespatternsofturbine‐causedfatalities—suchasseasonalspikesinfatalities,topographicorotherenvironmental
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐118
October 2014ICF 00323.08
featuresassociatedwithhighnumbersoffatalities,orotherfactorsthatcanpotentiallybemanipulatedandthatsuggestthatcurtailmentofaspecificturbine’soperationwouldresultinreducingfutureavianfatalities—theprojectoperatorcancurtailoperationsoftheoffendingturbineorturbines.CurtailmentrestrictionswouldbedevelopedincoordinationwiththeTACandbasedoncurrentlyavailablefatalitydata,usedata,andresearch.
ADMM‐6:Cut‐inSpeedStudy.Changesincut‐inspeedcouldbeconductedtoseeifchangingcut‐inspeedsfrom3meterspersecondto5meterspersecond(forexample)wouldsignificantlyreduceavianfatalities.TheproponentwillcoordinatewiththeTACindeterminingthefeasibilityofthemeasurefortheparticularspeciesaffectedaswellastheamountofthechangeinthecut‐inspeed.
ADMM‐7:Real‐TimeTurbineCurtailment.Theprojectproponentcanemployareal‐timeturbinecurtailmentprogramdesignedinconsultationwiththeTAC.Theintentwouldbetodeployabiologisttomonitoronsiteconditionsandissueacurtailmentorderwhenraptorsarenearoperatingturbines.Alternatively,radar,video,orothermonitoringmeasurescouldbedeployedinplaceofabiologicalmonitorifthereisevidencetoindicatethatsuchasystemwouldbeaseffectiveandmoreefficientthanuseofahumanmonitor.
ImpactBIO‐11a‐2:Avianmortalityresultingfrominteractionwithwindenergyfacilities—programAlternative2:450MW(significantandunavoidable)
Theoperationofwindenergyfacilitieshasbeenshowntocauseavianfatalitiesthroughcollisionswithwindturbinesandpowerlinesandthroughelectrocutiononpowerlines.
Mostcollectionlinesforfirst‐andsecond‐generationturbinesareabovegroundfacilities.Asrepoweringprojectsareimplemented,oldcollectionsystemswouldberemovedandnewcollectionsystemswouldbeinstalled.Themajorityofnewcollectionlinesassociatedwiththeprogramwouldbeundergrounded,reducingtheriskofavianfatalityfromelectrocutionorcollisionwithpowerlines.
DiabloWinds,BuenaVista,andVascoWindsaretheonlyrepoweredprojectsintheAPWRAforwhichestimatesofavianfatalityratesareavailable.Basedontheseestimates,aviancollisionriskmaybesubstantiallyreducedwhenolder‐generationturbinesarereplacedbynewer,largerturbineswiththesametotalratednameplatecapacity(Table3.4‐10).However,whiletheavailableevidencesuggeststhatrepoweringcouldsubstantiallyreduceturbine‐relatedavianfatalitiesbelowthelevelsdocumentedforoldergenerationturbines,avianfatalitieswouldcontinuetooccur.Moreover,whilerepoweringisintendedtoreducefatalities,enoughuncertaintyremainsinlightofproject‐andsite‐specificdatatowarrantaconservativeapproachintheimpactanalysis.Accordingly,thecontinuedlossofbirds(includingspecial‐statusspecies)ataratepotentiallygreaterthantheexistingbaselinefatalityratesisconsideredasignificantandunavoidableimpact.
ItshouldbenotedthatturbinesusedinfuturerepoweringprojectsarelikelytobeofsimilarsizetotheVascoWindsturbinesbutmuchlargerthantheDiabloWindsandBuenaVistaturbinesinbothoverallsizeandratednameplatecapacity.Thereisevidencetosuggestthatlargerturbines—likethoseusedintheVascoWindsproject—couldresultinadditionaldecreasesinavianfatalityratesforbirdspeciescurrentlykilledintheAPWRA(SmallwoodandKaras2009).However,itisalsopossiblethatlargerturbinesmaynegativelyaffectadifferentsuiteofbirdspeciesthathavebeenrelativelyunaffectedbyolder(i.e.,smaller)turbines.Inaddition,fatalityratesintheAPWRAarehighlyvariable(thatis,becausetheydifferacrossyears,turbinestypes,geographies,and
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐119
October 2014ICF 00323.08
topographies,speciesimpactsmaydifferbetweensitesduetodifferentlevelsofuse)andpotentiallyimprecise(Smallwoodetal.2010;ICFInternational2013).Nonetheless,thesethreerepoweringprojectsrepresentthebestavailableinformationtounderstandthepotentialforavianfatalitiesassociatedwithrepowering;accordingly,datafromtheseprojectswereusedtoformthebasisforavianfatalityestimates.TheestimatedchangesassociatedwithAlternative2areshowninTable3.4‐12anddiscussedbelow.Postconstructionmonitoring,oncetheturbinesareinoperation,willprovidedatatoquantifytheactualextentofchangeinavianfatalitiesfromrepoweringandtheextentofavianfatalityforprojectsintheprogramarea,andwillcontributetothebodyofknowledgesupportingfutureanalyses.
Table 3.4‐12. Estimated Annual Avian Fatalities for Existing and Repowered Program Area—Alternative 2 (450 MW)
Species
EstimatedAnnualFatalitiesforProgramArea
Nonrepowered
Repowered
AverageAnnualFatalities
DiabloWindsa
BuenaVistab
VascoWindsc,d
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
Americankestrel 194.2 40.5 79 67.5 65 133.7 31
Barnowl 79.5 9.0 89 0.0 0 14.9 81
Burrowingowl 255.1 378.0 ‐48 0.0 100 22.5 91
Goldeneagle 26.6 4.5 83 18.0 32 14.4 46
Loggerheadshrike 61.8 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Prairiefalcon 6.6 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Red‐tailedhawk 144.5 90.0 38 45.0 69 110.7 23
Swainson’shawk 0.5 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Allraptors 799.9 544.5 32 139.5 83 288.9 64
Allnativenon‐raptors 1,482.0 1,129.5 24 454.5 69 942.3 36
Note:fatalityratesreflectannualfatalities(95%confidenceinterval).a DiabloWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.b BuenaVistafatalityratesextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.c VascoWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.dVascoWindsfatalityrateforgoldeneaglebasedonupdatedinformationreceivedfromNextEraEnergyResourcesonJuly21,2014,andextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.
AmericanKestrel.AsshowninTable3.4‐12,afullyrepowered450MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated41–138Americankestrelfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualfatalitiesby31–79%.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheAmericankestrelpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
BarnOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐12,afullyrepowered450MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated9–15barnowlfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualfatalitiesby81–89%.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringonthebarnowlpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐120
October 2014ICF 00323.08
BurrowingOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐12,afullyrepowered450MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated23–378burrowingowlfatalitiesperyear—achangerangingfroma91%decreasetoa48%increaseinfatalities.ThisfatalityestimateisbasedondatafromDiabloWindsandVascoWindsbecausenoburrowingowlfatalitiesweredetectedatBuenaVista.Currentevidencesuggeststhatburrowingowlfatalityratesarenotreducedbythetransitionfromold‐tonew‐generationturbinestothesameextentasthefatalityratesofotherspecies.Theincreaseinenergyproductionfrom329MWto450MWwouldlikelyresultinasmallestimatedincreaseinburrowingowlfatalitiesperyear.However,agrowingbodyofcircumstantialevidenceindicatesthatmanyoftheburrowingowlfatalitiesfoundduringfatalitysurveysareduetopredationratherthanturbinecollision.Becauseofthisconfoundingeffect,thepotentialreductioninturbine‐relatedburrowingowlfatalitiesmaybeunderestimatedbecauseoftheinabilitytodistinguishfatalitiesresultingfrompredationfromthosecausedbyturbinecollision(ICFInternational2013).ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheburrowingowlpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
GoldenEagle.AsshowninTable3.4‐12,afullyrepowered450MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated5–18goldeneaglefatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualfatalitiesby32–83%.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringonthegoldeneaglepopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
LoggerheadShrike.NodocumentedfatalitiesofloggerheadshrikeshaveoccurredattheDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWindsprojects(Table3.4‐10),althoughloggerheadshrikesareregularlydetectedinthevicinityoftheDiabloWindsturbines.Thelackofdocumentedfatalitiesmaysuggestareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesatthesesites.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheloggerheadshrikepopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
PrairieFalcon.FatalityestimatesatrepoweredsitesarenotavailableforprairiefalconbecausenofatalitieshavebeendocumentedatDiabloWindsorVascoWindsandonlyonefatalityhasbeenrecordedatBuenaVista(Table3.4‐10).Therefore,itisdifficulttoestimatetheannualfatalitiesthatwouldresultfromafullyrepoweredprogramarea.Thelackofdocumentedfatalitiesmaysuggestareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesatthesesites.However,thenonrepoweredfatalityrateforprairiefalconisalreadyrelativelylow(0.02fatality/MW/year),suggestingthatthecollisionriskforthisspeciesislow.Prairiefalconoccursmostlyinwinter,andthebaselinefatalityrateismeasuredduringaperiodwhentheseasonalshutdownhasbeenineffect.Repoweredturbinesdonotshutdowninwinter.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheprairiefalconpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
Red‐TailedHawk.AsshowninTable3.4‐12,thefullyrepowered450MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated45–111red‐tailedhawkfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreasetheaverageannualfatalitiesby23–69%.Thepotentialimpactofrepoweringonthered‐tailedhawkpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
Swainson’sHawk.ThereisonlyonerecordedSwainson’shawkfatalityintheAPWRA,resultinginanannualestimatedfatalityrateofapproximatelyzero(Table3.4‐10).NoSwainson’shawkfatalitiesweredetectedatDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWinds.Basedonthelowestimatedfatalityratefromnonrepoweredsites,thelackoffatalitiesdetectedatrepoweredsites,andtherelativelylowuseoftheAPWRAbySwainson’shawks,itisexpectedthatthefatalityratefor
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐121
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Swainson’shawkwouldremainlowundertheprogram.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheSwainson’shawkpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
Raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐12,afullyrepowered450MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated140–545raptorfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualraptorfatalitiesby32–83%.
Nativenon‐raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐12,afullyrepowered450MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated455–1,130nativenon‐raptorfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreasetheaverageannualfatalitiesby24–69%.
Asdescribedabove,forallavianfocalspeciesanalyzed,afullyrepoweredprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoreduceestimatedfatalityrates.However,fatalitieswouldstillbeexpectedtoresultfromtheoperationoftherepoweredturbines,anduncertaintysurroundingtheaccuracyoftheestimatedfatalityratesandthetypesofspeciespotentiallyaffectedremains.Consideringthisinformation,anddespitetheanticipatedreductionsinavianimpactscomparedtothebaselinerates,theCountyhasdeterminedtouseaconservativeapproachfortheimpactassessment,concludingthatturbine‐relatedfatalitiescouldconstituteasubstantialadverseeffectonavianspeciesbecausetheratesforsomeorallofthespeciescouldbegreaterthanthebaselinerates.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐11athroughBIO‐11iwouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11a:Prepareaproject‐specificavianprotectionplan
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11f:Discouragepreyforraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11g:Implementpostconstructionavianfatalitymonitoringforallrepoweringprojectsandimplementadaptivemanagementmeasuresasnecessary
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11h:Compensateforthelossofraptorsandotheravianspecies,includinggoldeneagles,bycontributingtoconservationefforts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
ImpactBIO‐11b:Avianmortalityresultingfrominteractionwithwindenergyfacilities—GoldenHillsProject(significantandunavoidable)
TheoperationofrepoweredturbinesintheGoldenHillsprojectareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinareductioninavianfatalitiesbelowthenumberestimatedtooccurfromnonrepoweredturbines.However,asdiscussedaboveinImpactBIO‐11a‐1,repoweringwouldnoteliminateavianturbine‐relatedfatalities,considerableuncertaintysurroundingthecomparativedatasetremains,and
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐122
October 2014ICF 00323.08
fatalitiesfromturbinecollisionwouldstillconstituteasignificantandunavoidableimpact.Theestimatedreductioninannualfatalitiesdiffersbyspeciesandspeciesgroup.ThesereductionsarepresentedinTable3.4‐13andsummarizedbelow.
Table 3.4‐13. Estimated Annual Avian Fatalities for Existing and Repowered Golden Hills Project Area
Species
EstimatedAnnualFatalitiesforProgramArea
Nonrepowered
Repowered
AverageAnnualFatalities
DiabloWindsa BuenaVistab
VascoWindsc,d
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
Americankestrel 47.5 8.0 83 13.3 72 26.3 45
Barnowl 19.4 1.8 91 – – 2.9 85
Burrowingowl 62.4 74.3 ‐19 0.0 100 4.4 93
Goldeneagle 6.5 0.9 86 3.5 46 2.8 57
Loggerheadshrike 15.1 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Prairiefalcon 1.6 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Red‐tailedhawk 35.4 17.7 50 8.8 75 21.7 39
Swainson’shawk 0.1 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Allraptors 195.7 107.0 45 27.4 86 56.8 71
Allnativenon‐raptors 362.6 221.9 39 89.3 75 185.1 49
Note:fatalityratesreflectannualfatalities(95%confidenceinterval).a DiabloWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtotheGoldenHillsprojectarea.b BuenaVistafatalityratesextrapolatedtotheGoldenHillsprojectarea.c VascoWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtotheGoldenHillsprojectarea.dVascoWindsfatalityrateforgoldeneaglebasedonupdatedinformationreceivedfromNextEraEnergyResourcesonJuly21,2014,andextrapolatedtotheGoldenHillsprojectarea.
AmericanKestrel.AsshowninTable3.4‐13,therepowered88.4MWGoldenHillsprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated8–26Americankestrelfatalitiesperyear—a45–83%decrease.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheAmericankestrelpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
BarnOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐13,therepowered88.4MWGoldenHillsprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimatedtwotothreebarnowlfatalitiesperyear—an85–91%decrease.ThisfatalityestimateisbasedonfatalityratesfortheDiabloWindsandVascoWindsprojects;fatalityestimatesforbarnowlwerenotavailablefromtheBuenaVistaproject.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringonthebarnowlpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
BurrowingOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐13,therepowered88.4MWGoldenHillsprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated4–74burrowingowlfatalitiesperyear—achangerangingfroma91%decreasetoa19%increaseinfatalities.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐123
October 2014ICF 00323.08
However,agrowingbodyofcircumstantialevidenceindicatesthatmanyoftheburrowingoffatalitiesfoundduringfatalitysurveysareduetopredationratherthanturbinecollision.Becauseofthisconfoundingeffect,thepotentialreductioninturbine‐relatedburrowingowlfatalitiesmaybeunderestimatedbecauseoftheinabilitytodistinguishfatalitiesresultingfrompredationfromthosecausedbyturbinecollision.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheburrowingowlpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
GoldenEagle.AsshowninTable3.4‐13,therepowered88.4MWGoldenHillsprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinfromlessthanonetofourgoldeneaglefatalitiesperyear—a46–86%decrease.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringonthegoldeneaglepopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
LoggerheadShrike.NodocumentedfatalitiesofloggerheadshrikeshaveoccurredattheDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWindsprojects(Table3.4‐13),althoughloggerheadshrikesareregularlydetectedinthevicinityoftheDiabloWindsturbines.ThelackofdocumentedfatalitiessuggeststhattheremaybeareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesattheGoldenHillsprojectsite.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheloggerheadshrikepopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
PrairieFalcon.FatalityestimatesatrepoweredsitesarenotavailableforprairiefalconbecausenofatalitieshavebeendocumentedatDiabloWindsorVascoWindsandonlyonefatalityhasbeenrecordedatBuenaVista(Table3.4‐13).Therefore,itisdifficulttoestimatetheannualfatalitiesthatwouldresultfromtherepoweredGoldenHillsproject.ThelackofdocumentedfatalitiessuggeststheremaybeareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesattheGoldenHillsprojectsite.However,thenonrepoweredfatalityrateforprairiefalconisalreadyrelativelylow(0.02fatality/MW/year),suggestingthatthecollisionriskforthisspeciesislow.Prairiefalconoccursmostlyinwinter,andthebaselinefatalityrateismeasuredduringaperiodwhentheseasonalshutdownhasbeenineffect.Repoweredturbinesdonotshutdowninwinter.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheprairiefalconpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
Red‐TailedHawk.AsshowninTable3.4‐13,therepowered88.4MWGoldenHillsProjectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated9–22red‐tailedhawkfatalitiesperyear—a35–75%decrease.Thepotentialimpactofrepoweringonthered‐tailedhawkpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
Swainson’sHawk.ThereisonlyonerecordedSwainson’shawkfatalityintheAPWRA,resultinginanannualestimatedfatalityrateofapproximatelyzero(Table3.4‐13).NoSwainson’shawkfatalitiesweredetectedatDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWinds.Basedonthelowestimatedfatalityratefromnonrepoweredsites,thelackoffatalitiesdetectedatrepoweredsites,andtherelativelylownumberofdetectionsduringavianusesurveysconductedbytheAFMT(AlamedaCountyunpublisheddata),itisexpectedthatthefatalityrateforSwainson’shawkwouldremainnearzeroattherepoweredGoldenHillsproject.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheSwainson’shawkpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
Raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐13,therepowered88.4MWGoldenHillsprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated27–107raptorfatalitiesperyear—a45–86%decrease.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐124
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Nativenon‐raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐13,therepowered88.4MWGoldenHillsprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated89–222nativenon‐raptorfatalitiesperyear—a39–75%decrease.
Asdescribedabove,forallavianfocalspeciesanalyzed,therepoweredGoldenHillsprojectwouldbeexpectedtoreduceestimatedfatalityrates.However,fatalitieswouldstillbeexpectedtoresultfromtheoperationoftherepoweredturbines,anduncertaintysurroundingtheaccuracyoftheestimatedfatalityratesandthetypesofspeciespotentiallyaffectedremains.Consideringthisinformation,anddespitetheanticipatedreductionsinavianimpactscomparedtothebaselinerates,theCountyhasdeterminedtouseaconservativeapproachfortheimpactassessment,concludingthatturbine‐relatedfatalitiescouldconstituteasubstantialadverseeffectonavianspeciesbecausetheratesforsomeorallofthespeciescouldbegreaterthanthebaselinerates.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐12athroughBIO‐12jwouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11a:Prepareaproject‐specificavianprotectionplan
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11f:Discouragepreyforraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11g:Implementpostconstructionavianfatalitymonitoringforallrepoweringprojectsandimplementadaptivemanagementmeasuresasnecessary
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11h:Compensateforthelossofraptorsandotheravianspecies,includinggoldeneagles,bycontributingtoconservationefforts
TheCountyanticipatesthatthemitigationfeesrequiredbythe2010AgreementtoRepowerTurbinesattheAltamontPassWindResourceAreawillsatisfythismitigationmeasurefortheGoldenHillsProject.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
ImpactBIO‐11c:Avianmortalityresultingfrominteractionwithwindenergyfacilities—PattersonPassProject(significantandunavoidable)
TheoperationofrepoweredturbinesinthePattersonPassprojectareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinareductioninestimatedavianfatalityrateincomparisonwiththefatalityestimatesfromnonrepoweredturbines.However,asdiscussedaboveinImpactBIO‐11a‐1and11a‐2,repoweringwouldnoteliminateavianturbine‐relatedfatalities,considerableuncertaintysurroundingthecomparativedatasetremains,andfatalitiesfromturbinecollisionwouldstillresultinasignificantandunavoidableimpact.Theestimatedreductioninannualfatalitiesdiffersbyspeciesandspeciesgroup.ThesereductionsarepresentedinTable3.4‐13andsummarizedbelow.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐125
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.4‐14. Estimated Annual Avian Fatalities for Existing and Repowered Patterson Pass Project Area
Species
EstimatedAnnualFatalitiesforProgramArea
Nonrepowered
Repowered
AverageAnnualFatalities
DiabloWindsa BuenaVistab
VascoWindsc,d
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
Americankestrel 12.9 1.8 86 3.0 77 5.9 54
Barnowl 5.2 0.4 92 – – 0.7 87
Burrowingowl 16.9 16.6 2 0.0 100 1.0 94
Goldeneagle 1.8 0.2 89 0.8 56 0.6 67
Loggerheadshrike 4.1 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Prairiefalcon 0.4 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Red‐tailedhawk 9.6 4.0 59 2.0 79 4.9 49
Swainson’shawk 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0
Allraptors 53.1 24.0 55 6.1 88 12.7 76
Allnativenon‐raptors 98.4 49.7 49 20.0 80 41.5 58
Note:fatalityratesreflectannualfatalities(95%confidenceinterval).a DiabloWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtothePattersonPassprojectarea.b BuenaVistafatalityratesextrapolatedtothePattersonPassprojectarea.c VascoWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtothePattersonPassprojectarea.dVascoWindsfatalityrateforgoldeneaglebasedonupdatedinformationreceivedfromNextEraEnergyResourcesonJuly21,2014andextrapolatedtothePattersonPassprojectarea.
AmericanKestrel.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,therepowered19.8MWPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimatedtwotosixAmericankestrelfatalitiesperyear—a54–86%decrease.
BarnOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,therepowered19.8MWPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinlessthanonebarnowlfatalityperyear—an87–92%decrease.
BurrowingOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,therepowered19.8MWPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated1–17burrowingowlfatalitiesperyear—a2–94%decreaseinfatalities.ThisfatalityestimateisbasedondatafromDiabloWindsandVascoWinds;noburrowingowlfatalitiesweredetectedatBuenaVista.
However,agrowingbodyofcircumstantialevidenceindicatesthatmanyoftheburrowingoffatalitiesfoundduringfatalitysurveysareduetopredationratherthanturbinecollision.Becauseofthisconfoundingeffect,thepotentialreductioninturbine‐relatedburrowingowlfatalitiesmaybeunderestimatedbecauseoftheinabilitytodistinguishfatalitiesresultingfrompredationfromthosecausedbyturbinecollision.
GoldenEagle.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,therepowered19.8MWPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinlessthanonegoldeneaglefatalityperyear—a56–89%decrease.
LoggerheadShrike.NodocumentedfatalitiesofloggerheadshrikeshaveoccurredattheDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWindsprojects(Table3.4‐14),althoughloggerheadshrikesare
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐126
October 2014ICF 00323.08
regularlydetectedinthevicinityoftheDiabloWindsturbines.ThelackofdocumentedfatalitiessuggeststhattheremaybeareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesatthePatternPassprojectsite.
PrairieFalcon.FatalityestimatesatrepoweredsitesarenotavailableforprairiefalconbecausenofatalitieshavebeendocumentedatDiabloWindsorVascoWindsandonlyonefatalityhasbeenrecordedatBuenaVista(Table3.4‐14).Therefore,itisdifficulttoestimatetheannualfatalitiesthatwouldresultfromtherepoweredPattersonPassproject.ThelackofdocumentedfatalitiessuggeststhattheremaybeareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesatthePattersonPassprojectsite.However,thenonrepoweredfatalityrateforprairiefalconisalreadyrelativelylow(0.02fatality/MW/year),suggestingthatthecollisionriskforthisspeciesislow.Prairiefalconoccursmostlyinwinter,andthebaselinefatalityrateismeasuredduringaperiodwhentheseasonalshutdownhasbeenineffect.Repoweredturbinesdonotshutdowninwinter.
Red‐TailedHawk.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,therepowered19.8MWPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimatedtwotofivered‐tailedhawkfatalitiesperyear—a49–79%decrease.
Swainson’sHawk.ThereisonlyonerecordedSwainson’shawkfatalityintheAPWRA,resultinginanannualestimatedfatalityrateofapproximatelyzero(Table3.4‐14).NoSwainson’shawkfatalitiesweredetectedatDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWinds.Basedonthelowestimatedfatalityratefromnonrepoweredsitesandthelackoffatalitiesdetectedatrepoweredsites,itisexpectedthatthefatalityrateforSwainson’shawkwouldremainlowattherepoweredPattersonPassprojectsite.
Raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,therepowered19.8MWPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated6–24raptorfatalitiesperyear—a55–88%decrease.
Nativenon‐raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,therepowered19.8MWPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated20–50nativenon‐raptorfatalitiesperyear—a49–80%decrease.
Asdescribedabove,forallavianfocalspeciesanalyzed,therepoweredPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoreduceestimatedfatalityrates.However,fatalitieswouldstillbeexpectedtoresultfromtheoperationoftherepoweredturbines,anduncertaintysurroundingtheaccuracyoftheestimatedfatalityratesandthetypesofspeciespotentiallyaffectedremains.Consideringthisinformation,anddespitetheanticipatedreductionsinavianimpactscomparedtothebaselinerates,theCountyhasdeterminedtouseaconservativeapproachfortheimpactassessment,concludingthatturbine‐relatedfatalitiescouldconstituteasubstantialadverseeffectonavianspeciesbecausetheratesforsomeorallofthespeciescouldbegreaterthanthebaselinerates.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant.Implementationofthemitigationmeasureslistedbelowwouldreducethisimpactbutnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐11athroughBIO‐11iwouldreducethisimpactbutnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11a:Prepareaproject‐specificavianprotectionplan
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐127
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11f:Discouragepreyforraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11g:Implementpostconstructionavianfatalitymonitoringforallrepoweringprojectsandimplementadaptivemanagementmeasuresasnecessary
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11h:Compensateforthelossofraptorsandotheravianspecies,includinggoldeneagles,bycontributingtoconservationefforts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
ImpactBIO‐12a‐1:Potentialmortalityordisturbanceofbatsfromroostremovalordisturbance—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Severalspeciesofbothcommon(Myotisspp.)andspecial‐status(westernredbat,pallidbat,Townsend’sbig‐earedbat)batsareknowntooccurorcouldoccurinoraroundtheprogramarea,andcouldusetheareaforforaging,dispersal,andmigration.Batsmayuserockoutcrops,trees,buildings,bridges,andotherstructuresintheprogramareaasmaternityormigratorystopoverroosts.Permanentwaterbodiesandstocktanksinandadjacenttotheprogramareaprovidesourcesoffreshwaterforbothresidentandmigratorybats.
Constructionanddecommissioningofturbinescouldresultindisturbanceorlossofactivebatrooststhroughincreasedtraffic,noise,lighting,andhumanaccess.Removalordisturbanceoftrees,rockoutcrops,debrispiles,outbuildings,orotherartificialstructurescouldresultinremovalofroosthabitatandmortalityofbatsusingthestructureasaroost.Severalspeciesofbataresensitivetodisturbanceandmayabandonflightlessyoung,ortheymaysimplynotreturntotheroostoncedisturbed,resultinginthelossofthatroostashabitatforthelocalpopulation.Becausesomebatsroostcolonially,removalofspecial‐statusspecies’rooststructuresinaroost‐limitedhabitatcouldresultinthelossofasignificantportionofthelocalbatpopulation.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐3,BIO‐12a,andBIO‐12bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
Priortodevelopmentofanyrepoweringproject,aqualifiedbatbiologistwillconductaroosthabitatassessmenttoidentifypotentialcolonialroostsitesofspecial‐statusandcommonbatspecieswithin750feetoftheconstructionarea.Ifsuitableroostsitesaretoberemovedorotherwiseaffectedbytheproposedproject,thebatbiologistwillconducttargetedroostsurveys
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐128
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ofallidentifiedsitesthatwouldbeaffected.Becausebatactivityishighlyvariable(bothspatiallyandtemporally)acrossthelandscapeandmaymoveunpredictablyamongseveralroosts,severalseparatesurveyvisitsmayberequired.Surveyswillberepeatedatdifferenttimesofyearifdeemednecessarybythebatbiologisttodeterminethepresenceofseasonallyactiveroosts(hibernacula,migratorystopovers,maternityroosts).Appropriatefieldmethodswillbeemployedtodeterminethespecies,type,andvulnerabilityoftheroosttoconstructiondisturbance.Methodswillfollowbestpracticesforroostsurveyssuchthatspeciesarenotdisturbedandadequatetemporalandspatialcoverageisprovidedtoincreaselikelihoodofdetection.
Roostsurveysmayconsistofbothdaylightsurveysforsignsofbatuseandevening/nightvisit(s)toconductemergencesurveysorevaluatethestatusofnightroosts.Surveytimingshouldbeadequatetoaccountforindividualbatsorspeciesthatmightnotemergeuntilwellafterdark.
Methodsandapproachesfordeterminingroostoccupancystatusshouldincludeacombinationofthefollowingcomponentsasthebiologistdeemsnecessaryfortheparticularroostsite.
Passiveand/oractiveacousticmonitoringtoassistwithspeciesidentification.
Guanotrapstodetermineactivitystatus.
Night‐visionequipment.
Passiveinfraredcameratraps.
Atthecompletionoftheroostsurveys,areportwillbeprepareddocumentingareassurveyed,methods,results,andmappingofhigh‐qualityhabitatorconfirmedroostlocations.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
Activebatroostswillnotbedisturbed,andwillbeprovidedaminimumbufferof500feetwherepreexistingdisturbanceismoderateor750feetwherepreexistingdisturbanceisminimal.ConfirmationofbufferdistancesanddeterminationoftheneedforabiologicalmonitorforactivematernityroostsorhibernaculawillbeobtainedinconsultationwithCDFW.Ataminimum,whenanactivematernityroostorhibernaculumispresentwithin750feetofaconstructionsite,aqualifiedbiologistwillconductaninitialassessmentoftheroostresponsetoconstructionactivitiesandwillrecommendbufferexpansioniftherearesignsofdisturbancefromtheroost.
Structures(naturalorartificial)showingevidenceofsignificantbatusewithinthepastyearwillbeleftinplaceashabitatwhereverfeasible.Shouldsuchastructureneedtoberemovedordisturbed,CDFWwillbeconsultedtodetermineappropriatebuffers,timingandmethods,andcompensatorymitigationforthelossoftheroost.
Allprojectproponentswillprovideenvironmentalawarenesstrainingtoconstructionpersonnel,establishbuffers,andinitiateconsultationwithCDFWifneeded.
Artificialnightlightingwithin500feetofanyroostwillbeshieldedandangledsuchthatbatsmayenterandexittheroostwithoutartificialilluminationandtheroostdoesnotreceiveartificialexposuretovisualpredators.
Treeandvegetationremovalwillbeconductedoutsidethematernityseason(April1–September15)toavoiddisturbanceofmaternitygroupsoffoliage‐roostingbats.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐129
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Ifamaternityroostorhibernaculumispresentwithin500feetoftheconstructionsitewherepreexistingdisturbanceismoderateorwithin750feetwherepreexistingdisturbanceisminimal,aqualifiedbiologicalmonitorwillbeonsiteduringgroundbreakingactivities.
ImpactBIO‐12a‐2:Potentialmortalityordisturbanceofbatsfromroostremovalordisturbance—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Severalspeciesofbothcommon(Myotisspp.)andspecial‐status(westernredbat,pallidbat,Townsend’sbig‐earedbat)batsareknowntooccurorcouldoccurinoraroundtheprogramarea,andcouldusetheareaforforaging,dispersal,andmigration.Batsmayuserockoutcrops,trees,buildings,bridges,andotherstructuresintheprogramareaasmaternityormigratorystopoverroosts.Permanentwaterbodiesandstocktanksinandadjacenttotheprogramareaprovidesourcesoffreshwaterforbothresidentandmigratorybats.
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Constructionanddecommissioningofturbinescouldresultindisturbanceorlossofactivebatrooststhroughincreasedtraffic,noise,lighting,andhumanaccess.Removalordisturbanceoftrees,rockoutcrops,debrispiles,outbuildings,orotherartificialstructurescouldresultinremovalofroosthabitatandmortalityofbatsusingthestructureasaroost.Severalspeciesofbataresensitivetodisturbanceandmayabandonflightlessyoung,ortheymaysimplynotreturntotheroostoncedisturbed,resultinginthelossofthatroostashabitatforthelocalpopulation.Becausesomebatsroostcolonially,removalofspecial‐statusspecies’rooststructuresinaroost‐limitedhabitatcouldresultinthelossofasignificantportionofthelocalbatpopulation.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐3,BIO‐12a,andBIO‐12bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
ImpactBIO‐12b:Potentialmortalityordisturbanceofbatsfromroostremovalordisturbance—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionanddecommissioningofturbinescouldresultindisturbanceorlossofactivebatrooststhroughincreasedtraffic,noise,lightingorhumanaccess.Removalordisturbanceoftrees,rockoutcrops,debrispiles,outbuildings,orotherartificialstructurescouldresultinremovalofroosthabitatandmortalityofbatsusingthestructureasaroost.Severalspeciesofbataresensitivetodisturbanceandmayabandonflightlessyoung,ortheymaysimplynotreturntotheroostoncedisturbed,resultinginthelossofthatroostashabitatforthelocalpopulation.Becausesomebatsroostcolonially,removalofspecial‐statusspecies’rooststructuresinaroost‐limitedhabitatcould
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐130
October 2014ICF 00323.08
resultinthelossofasignificantportionofthelocalbatpopulation.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐3,BIO‐12aandBIO‐12bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
ImpactBIO‐12c:Potentialmortalityordisturbanceofbatsfromroostremovalordisturbance—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionanddecommissioningofturbinescouldresultindisturbanceorlossofactivebatrooststhroughincreasedtraffic,noise,lightingorhumanaccess.Removalordisturbanceoftrees,rockoutcrops,debrispiles,outbuildings,orotherartificialstructurescouldresultinremovalofroosthabitatandmortalityofbatsusingthestructureasaroost.Severalspeciesofbataresensitivetodisturbanceandmayabandonflightlessyoung,ortheymaysimplynotreturntotheroostoncedisturbed,resultinginthelossofthatroostashabitatforthelocalpopulation.Becausesomebatsroostcolonially,removalofspecial‐statusspecies’rooststructuresinaroost‐limitedhabitatcouldresultinthelossofasignificantportionofthelocalbatpopulation.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐3,BIO‐12aandBIO‐12bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
ImpactBIO‐13a‐1:Potentialforconstructionactivitiestotemporarilyremoveoralterbatforaginghabitat—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificant)
Constructionofrepoweringprojectscoulddegradebatforaginghabitatbyreplacingvegetationwithnonvegetatedlandcovertypes.Projectconstructionwouldcreateatemporaryincreaseintraffic,noise,andartificialnightlightingintheprogramarea,reducingtheextentoflandscapeavailableforforaging.However,theamountoflandscapereturnedtoforaginghabitatintheprocessofdecommissioningthefirst‐andsecond‐generationturbineswouldoffsettheamountofforaginghabitatlosttorepoweringactivities.Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐131
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactBIO‐13a‐2:Potentialforconstructionactivitiestotemporarilyremoveoralterbatforaginghabitat—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificant)
Constructionofrepoweringprojectscoulddegradebatforaginghabitatbyreplacingvegetationwithnonvegetatedlandcovertypes.DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Projectconstructionwouldcreateatemporaryincreaseintraffic,noise,andartificialnightlightingintheprogramarea,reducingtheextentoflandscapeavailableforforaging.However,theamountoflandscapereturnedtoforaginghabitatintheprocessofdecommissioningthefirst‐andsecond‐generationturbineswouldoffsettheamountofforaginghabitatlosttorepoweringactivities.Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐13b:Potentialforconstructionactivitiestotemporarilyremoveoralterbatforaginghabitat—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificant)
ConstructionoftheGoldenHillsProjectcoulddegradebatforaginghabitatbyreplacingvegetationwithnonvegetatedlandcovertypes.Projectconstructionwouldcreateatemporaryincreaseintraffic,noise,andartificialnightlightingintheprogramarea,reducingtheextentoflandscapeavailableforforaging.However,theamountoflandscapereturnedtoforaginghabitatintheprocessofdecommissioningthefirst‐andsecond‐generationturbineswouldoffsettheamountofforaginghabitatlosttorepoweringactivities.Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐13c:Potentialforconstructionactivitiestotemporarilyremoveoralterbatforaginghabitat—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificant)
ConstructionofthePattersonPassProjectcoulddegradebatforaginghabitatbyreplacingvegetationwithnonvegetatedlandcovertypes.Projectconstructionwouldcreateatemporaryincreaseintraffic,noise,andartificialnightlightingintheprogramarea,reducingtheextentoflandscapeavailableforforaging.However,theamountoflandscapereturnedtoforaginghabitatintheprocessofdecommissioningthefirst‐andsecond‐generationturbineswouldoffsettheamountofforaginghabitatlosttorepoweringactivities.Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐14a‐1:Turbine‐relatedfatalitiesofspecial‐statusandotherbats—programAlternative1:417MW(significantandunavoidable)
Residentandmigratorybatsflyinginandthroughtheprogramareamaybekilledbycollisionwithwindturbinebladesorotherinteractionwiththewindturbinegenerators.
Insufficientdataarecurrentlyavailabletodevelopaccuratefatalityestimatesforindividualbatspecies.FivebatspecieshavebeendocumentedinfatalitymonitoringprogramsintheAPWRA(InsigniaEnvironmental2012:48;Brownetal.2013:23;ICFInternational2012:3‐3),ofwhichtwo(westernredbatandhoarybat)arespecial‐statusspecies.Extrapolatingfromexistingfatalitydataandfromtrendsobservedatotherwindenergyfacilitieswherefourth‐generationturbinesareinoperation,itappearslikelythatfatalitieswouldoccurpredominantlyinthelatesummertomid‐fallmigrationperiod;thatfatalitieswouldconsistmostlyofmigratorybats,particularlyMexicanfree‐tailedbatandhoarybat;thatfatalitieswouldoccursporadicallyatothertimesofyear;andthatfatalitiesofoneormoreotherspecieswouldoccurinsmallernumbers.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐132
October 2014ICF 00323.08
DiabloWinds,BuenaVista,andVascoWindsaretheonlyrepoweredprojectsintheAPWRAforwhichestimatesofbatfatalityratesareavailable.Whiletheseratesvarywidely(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1067;InsigniaEnvironmental2012:65;Brownetal.2013:39),basedontheseestimates,batcollisionriskincreasessubstantiallywhenold‐generationturbinesarereplacedbynewer,largerturbines(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1068).TurbinesusedinfuturerepoweringprojectsarelikelytobesimilarinsizetotheVascoWindsturbinesbutmuchlargerthantheDiabloWindsandBuenaVistaturbinesinbothoverallsizeandratednameplatecapacity.ThereisevidencetosuggestthatlargerturbinessimilartothoseusedintheVascoWindsprojectwillresultinadditionalincreasesinbatfatalityratesforthosebatspeciescurrentlykilledintheAPWRA.
Somehypothesesfortheincreasedcollisionrisktomigratorybatspeciesatfourth‐generationturbinesaresummarizedbelow.
Batstendnottoflyathighwindspeeds.Thelowerwindspeedsatwhichfourth‐generationturbinesareabletoproducepowercreatemoreoverlapinthetimethatturbinesareoperatingandbatsareintheair.Inseveralstudies,themajorityoffatalitiesoccurredonnightsoflowerwindspeed(lessthan5.5meters/second[m/s])(Arnettetal.2008:73;Goodetal.2012:iv).Thiscorrelationsuggestsapossiblesourcefortheincreasedriskthatfourth‐generationturbinesposetobats.
Migratorytree‐roostingbatsmaybeattractedtothetubulartowerstructureofnewerturbines;thisattractionmayberelatedtomatingbehaviorduringmigration(Arnettetal.2008:73;Cryan2008:1).
Echolocationpulsesmaynotbeusedduringopen‐airmigratoryflight,ornotusedasoften,resultinginbatsbeingunawareofthehazardpresentedbytheturbineblades(Kunzetal.2007:319).
Foraging,wateracquisition,roostselection,ormatingbehaviorduringmigrationseasonmaybringbatsthroughtherotor‐sweptareaoftallerturbinesmoreoften(CryanandBarclay2009:1333).
Tallerturbineshavebeendocumentedtokillmorebats.Theincreasedheightoffourth‐generationturbinesputstherotor‐sweptareaintobatflightpaths(Barclayetal2007:384).
Table3.4‐15providesacomparisonoftheestimatednumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurifold‐generationturbinesareallowedtocontinueoperatingattheircurrentlevelandtheestimatednumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurafterrepoweringoftheprogramareaandthetwoprojectareas.Duetothehighdegreeofuncertaintyinbatfatalityestimates,arangeofestimatesbasedonavailabledataispresented.Thelowestestimateisderivedfromthebestestimaterateof1.679fatalities/MW/yearreportedforthefirstyearofmonitoringattheVascoWindsrepoweringproject(Brownetal.2013:39).Theupperendofthisrangeiscalculatedusingthebatfatalityrateof3.92fatalities/MW/yearreportedfortheShilohIprojectintheMontezumaHillsWindResourceArea.Thebaselineestimateisderivedfromthebatfatalityrateof0.263fatalities/MW/yearreportedfortheAPWRAfor2005–2007(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1066).AsshowninTable3.4‐15,annualestimatedbatfatalitiesintheprogramareafromimplementationofAlternative1areanticipatedtoincreasefromthecurrentestimateof87to700–1,635fatalities.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐133
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.4‐15. Estimated Range of Annual Bat Fatalities
StudyArea Capacity(MW) BaselineFatalitiesa PredictedFatalitiesb
Existingprogramarea 329 87 –
ProgramAlternative1 417 110 700–1,635
ProgramAlternative2 450 118 756–1,764
GoldenHills 88.4 23 148–347
PattersonPass 19.8 5 33–78a EstimateoftotalbaselinefatalitiesarebasedontheSmallwoodandKarasfatalityrateof0.263fatalities/MW/yearderivedfrom2005–2007monitoringattheAPWRA.
b EstimateoftotalpredictedfatalitiesarebasedonfatalityratesfromtheVascoWindsrepoweringproject(1.679fatalities/MW/year),andfromthemultiyearaverageratesfromtheShilohIprojectintheMontezumaHillsWRA(3.92fatalities/MW/year).
Despitethehighlevelofuncertaintyinestimatesofbatfatalityrates,allavailabledatasuggestthatrepoweringwouldresultinasubstantialincreaseinbatfatalities.Thedegreeofincreasemaybeinfluencedbythefollowingfactors.
Turbineplacementinareasofhighautumnbatactivityoralongmigrationroutes.
Turbineplacementalongcommutingflywaystokeyresources(e.g.,roosts,water,foraginghabitat).
Behavioroftheturbinemodelbeforeitcutsin(i.e.,whetherbladesareallowedtospinatlowerwindspeeds)(Goodetal.2012:v).
MitigationMeasuresBIO‐14athroughBIO‐14ewouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
Allprojectproponentswillusethebestinformationavailabletositeturbinesandtoselectfromturbinemodelsinsuchamannerastoreducebatcollisionrisk.Thesitingandselectionprocesswilltakeintoaccountbatuseoftheareaandlandscapefeaturesknowntoincreasecollisionrisk(trees,edgehabitats,riparianareas,waterbodies,andwetlands).Measuresincludebutarenotlimitedtositingturbinesthegreatestdistancefeasibleupto500meters(1,640)feetfromstillorflowingbodiesofwater,riparianhabitat,knownroosts,andtreestands(CaliforniaBatWorkingGroup2006:6).
Togeneratesite‐specific“bestinformation”toinformturbinesitingandoperationdecisions,abathabitatassessmentandroostsurveywillbeconductedintheprojectareatoidentifyandmaphabitatofpotentialsignificancetobats,suchaspotentialroostsites(treesandshrubs,significantrockformations,artificialstructures)andwatersources.TurbinesitingdecisionswillincorporaterelevantbatusesurveydataandbatfatalityrecordspublishedbyotherprojectsintheAPWRA.RoostsurveyswillbecarriedoutaccordingtothemethodsdescribedinMitigationMeasure‐BIO‐12a.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14b:Implementpostconstructionbatfatalitymonitoringprogramforallrepoweringprojects
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐134
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Ascientificallydefensible,postconstructionbatfatalitymonitoringprogramwillbeimplementedtoestimateactualbatfatalitiesanddetermineifadditionalmitigationisrequired.Bat‐specificmodificationstothe3‐yearpostconstructionmonitoringprogramdescribedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11g,developedinaccordancewithCEC2007andwithappropriaterecommendationsfromCaliforniaBatWorkingGroupguidelines(2006),willbeimplemented.
InadditiontotherequirementsoutlinedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11g,thefollowingtwobat‐specificrequirementswillbeadded.
IncludeontheTACatleastonebiologistwithsignificantexpertiseinbatresearchandwindenergyimpactsonbats.
Conductbatacousticsurveysconcurrentlywithfatalitymonitoringintheprojectareatoestimatenightly,seasonal,orannualvariationsinrelativeactivityandspeciesusepatterns,andtocontributetothebodyofknowledgeonseasonalbatmovementsandrelationshipsbetweenbatactivity,environmentalvariables,andturbinefatality.Shouldemergingresearchsupporttheapproach,thesedatamaybeusedtogeneratesite‐specificpredictivemodelstoincreasetheprecisionandeffectivenessofmitigationmeasures(e.g.,theseason‐specific,multivariatemodelsdescribedbyWellerandBaldwin2011:11).Acousticbatsurveyswillbedesignedanddataanalysisconductedbyqualifiedbiologistswithsignificantexperienceinacousticbatsurveytechniques.Methodswillbeinformedbythelatestavailableguidelines(CaliforniaEnergyCommissionguidelines,2007);CaliforniaBatWorkingGroupguidelines,2006),exceptwherebestavailablesciencesupportstechnologicalormethodologicalupdates.High‐quality,sensitiveacousticequipmentwillbeusedtoproducedataofsufficientqualitytogeneratespeciesidentifications.Surveydesignandmethodswillbescientificallydefensibleandwillinclude,ataminimum,thefollowingelements.
Acousticdetectorswillbeinstalledatmultiplestationstoadequatelysamplerangeofhabitatsintheprojectareaforbothresidentandmigratorybats.Thenumberofdetectorarraysinstalledperprojectsitewillincorporateemergingresearchonthedensityofdetectorsrequiredtoadequatelymeetsamplinggoalsandinformmitigationapproaches(WellerandBaldwin2011:10).
AcousticdetectorarrayswillsamplemultipleairspaceheightsincludingasclosetotherepoweredrotorsweptareaaspossibleVerticalstructuresusedformountingmaybepreexistingormaybeinstalledfortheproject(e.g.,temporaryorpermanentmeteorologicaltowers).
SurveyswillbeconductedsuchthatdataarecollectedcontinuouslyfromearlyJulytoearlyNovembertocovertheactivitytransitionfrommaternitytomigrationseasonanddetermineifthereiselevatedactivityduringmigration.Surveyseasonmaybeadjustedtomoreaccuratelyreflectthefullextentofthelocalmigrationseasonand/orseason(s)ofgreatestlocalbatfatalityrisk,ifscientificallysounddatasupportdoingso.
Anticipatedadaptivemanagementgoals,suchasdeterminingjustifiabletimeframestoreducerequiredperiodsofcut‐inspeedadjustments,willbereviewedwiththeTACandincorporatedindesigningtheacousticmonitoringanddataanalysisprogram.
Modificationstothefatalitysearchprotocolwillbeimplementedtoobtainbetterinformationonthenumberandtimingofbatfatalities(e.g.,Johnstonetal.2013:85).Modificationswillincludedecreasesinthetransectwidthandsearchintervalforaperiodoftimecoincidingwithhigh
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐135
October 2014ICF 00323.08
levelsofbatmortality,i.e.,thefallmigrationseason(roughlyAugusttoearlyNovember,orasappropriateintheviewoftheTAC).Thenatureofbat‐specifictransectdistanceandsearchintervalswillbedeterminedinconsultationwiththeTACandwillbeguidedbyscientificallysoundandpertinentdataonratesofbatcarcassdetectionatwindenergyfacilities(e.g.,Johnstonetal.2013:54–55)andsite‐specificdatafromAPWRArepoweringprojectfatalitymonitoringprogramsasthesedatabecomeavailable.
OthermethodstoachievethegoalsofthebatfatalitymonitoringprogramwhileavoidingprohibitivecostsmaybeconsideredsubjecttoapprovalbytheTAC,ifthesemethodshavebeenpeerreviewedandevidenceindicatesthemethodsareeffective.Forexample,ifprojectproponentswishtohavetheoptionofalteringsearchmethodologytoanewlydevelopedmethod,suchassearchingonlyroadsandpads(Goodetal.2011:73),astatisticallyrobustfieldstudytoindextheresultsofthemethodologyagainststandardsearchmethodswillbeconductedconcurrentlytoensuresite‐specific,long‐termvalidityofthenewmethods.
Finally,detectionprobabilitytrialswillutilizebatcarcassestodevelopbat‐specificdetectionprobabilities.Careshouldbetakentoavoidintroducingnoveldiseasereservoirs;suchavoidancewillentailusingonsitefatalitiesorusingcarcassesobtainedfromwithinareasonablyanticipatedflightdistanceforthatspecies.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14c:Prepareandpublishannualmonitoringreportsonthefindingsofbatuseoftheprojectareaandfatalitymonitoringresults
Annualreportsofbatuseresultsandfatalitymonitoringwillbeproducedwithin3monthsoftheendofthelastdayoffatalitymonitoring.Special‐statusbatspeciesrecordswillbereportedtoCNDDB.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
InconcertwithMitigationMeasureBIO‐14b,allprojectproponentswilldevelopadaptivemanagementplanstoensureappropriate,feasible,andcurrentincorporationofemerginginformation.Thegoalsoftheadaptivemanagementplansaretoensurethatthebestavailablescienceandemergingtechnologiesareusedtoassessimpactsonbats,andthatimpactsareminimizedtothegreatestextentpossiblewhilemaximizingenergyproduction.
Theproject‐specificadaptivemanagementplanswillbeusedtoadjustoperationandmitigationtoincorporatetheresultsofprojectareamonitoringandnewtechnologyandresearchresultswhensufficientevidenceexiststosupportthesenewapproaches.TheseplanswillbereviewedbytheTACandapprovedbytheCounty.Alladaptivemanagementmeasureswillbeimplementedwithinareasonabletimeframe,sufficienttoallowthemeasurestotakeeffectinthefirstfallmigrationseasonfollowingtheyearofmonitoringinwhichtheadaptivemanagementthresholdwascrossed.ADMMsmaybemodifiedbytheCountyinconsultationwiththeTACtotakeintoaccountcurrentresearch,site‐specificdata,andthemosteffectiveimpactreductionstrategies.ADMMswillincludeascientificallydefensible,controlledresearchcomponentandminimumpost‐implementationmonitoringtimetoevaluatetheeffectivenessandvalidityofthemeasures.Theminimummonitoringtimewillconsistofthreesequentialfallseasonsofthebat‐specificmortalitymonitoringprogramcoveringthe3–4monthsoftheyearinwhichthehighestbatmortalityhasbeenobserved:likelyAugust–November.Thestartandenddatesofthe3–4monthsofbat‐specificmortalitymonitoringperiodwillbebasedonexistingfatalitydataandinconsultationwiththeTAC.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐136
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Determiningafatalitythresholdtotriggeradaptivemanagementisnotstraightforward,asinsufficientinformationexistsonthestatusandvitalityofthepopulationsofmigratorybatspeciessubjecttomortalityintheAPWRA.ThelowestimateofanticipatedbatfatalityratesisfromtheVascoWindsprojectintheAPWRA.Applyingthisrateprogrammaticallywouldresultinanestimateof21,000batskilledoverthe30‐yearlifeoftheprogram.ThehighestimateisfromtheMontezumaHillsWindResourceArea.Applyingthisrateprogrammaticallywouldresultinanestimateof49,050batskilledoverthe30‐yearlifeoftheprogram.Batsareslowtoreproduce,andturbinesmaybemorelikelytokilladultbatsthanjuveniles,suggestingthataconservativeapproachiswarranted.Accordingly,aninitialadaptivemanagementthresholdwillbeestablishedusingthelowfatalityestimates,or1.679fatalities/MW/year,toensurethatthemostconservativetriggerforimplementationofadaptivemanagementmeasuresisadopted.
Ifpostconstructionfatalitymonitoringresultsinapointestimateforthebatfatalityratethatexceedsthe1.679fatalities/MW/yearthresholdbyastatisticallysignificantamount,then,inconsultationwiththeTAC,ADMM‐7andADMM‐8(describedbelow)forbatswillbeimplemented.
Itisimportanttonotethatneitherthehighnorthelowestimatespeakstotheabilityofbatpopulationstowithstandtheassociatedlevelsoftake.TheinitialfatalityratethresholdtriggeringadaptivemanagementmaybemodifiedbytheTACifappropriateandifsuchadaptationissupportedbythebestavailablescience.
TheTACmaydirectimplementationofadaptivemanagementmeasuresforotherappropriatereasons,suchasanunexpectedlyandmarkedlyhighfatalityrateobservedforanybatspecies,orspecial‐statusspeciesbeingkilledinunexpectedlyhighnumbers.
ADMMsforbatsmaybeimplementedusingasteppedapproachuntilnecessaryfatalityreductionsarereached,andmonitoringmethodsmustberevisedasneededtoensureaccuratemeasurementoftheeffectivenessoftheADMMs.AdditionalADMMsforbatsshouldbedevelopedasnewtechnologiesorsciencesupportsdoingso.
ADMM‐7:SeasonalTurbineCut‐inSpeedIncrease.Cut‐inspeedincreasesofferthemostpromisingandimmediatelyavailableapproachtoreducingbatfatalitiesatfourth‐generationwindturbines.Reductionsinfatalities(53–87%)wereobservedwhenincreasingmodernturbinecut‐inspeedto5.0–6.5m/s(Arnettetal.2009:3;Goodetal.2012:iii).Whileimplementingthismeasureimmediatelyuponaproject’scommencementwouldlikelyreducebatfatalities,thatassumptionisnotyetsupportedbyconclusivedata.Moreover,withoutestablishingbaselinefatalityatrepoweredprojects,therewouldbenowaytodeterminetheeffectivenessoftheapproachorwhetherthecostsofincreasedcut‐inspeeds(andconsequentpowergenerationreductions)wereprovidingfatalityreductions.
Cut‐inspeedincreaseswillbeimplementedasoutlinedbelow,witheffectivenessassessedannually.
Theprojectproponentwillincreasecut‐inspeedto5.0m/sfromsunsettosunriseduringpeakmigrationseason(generallyAugust–October).Ifthisisineffective,theprojectproponentwillincreaseturbinecut‐inspeedbyannualincrementsof0.5m/suntiltargetfatalityreductionsareachieved.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐137
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Theprojectproponentmayrefinesite‐specificmigrationstartdatesonthebasisofpre‐andpostconstructionacousticsurveysandongoingreviewofdatesoffatalityoccurrencesformigratorybatsintheAPWRA.
Theprojectproponentmayrequestashorterseasonofrequiredcut‐inspeedincreaseswithsubstantialevidencethatsimilarlevelsofmortalityreductioncouldbeachieved.ShouldresourceagenciesandtheTACfindthereissufficientsupportforashorterperiod(aslowas8weeks),evidenceinsupportofthisshorterperiodwillbedocumentedforthepublicrecordandtheshorterperiodmaybeimplemented.
Theprojectproponentmayrequestshorternightlyperiodsofcut‐inspeedincreaseswithsubstantialevidencefromdefensibleonsite,long‐termpostconstructionacousticsurveysindicatingpredictablenightlytimeframeswhentargetspeciesappearnottobeactive.Targetspeciesareheredefinedasmigratorybatsoranyotherspeciesappearingrepeatedlyinthefatalityrecords.
Theprojectproponentmayrequestexceptionstocut‐inspeedincreasesforparticularweathereventsorwindpatternsifsubstantialevidenceisavailablefromonsiteacousticorothermonitoringtosupportsuchexceptions(i.e.,allavailableliteratureandonsitesurveysindicatethatbatactivityceasesduringspecificweathereventsorotherpredictableconditions).
Intheabsenceofdefensiblesite‐specificdata,mandatorycut‐inspeedincreaseswillcommenceonAugust1andcontinuethroughOctober31,andwillbeineffectfromsunsettosunrise.
ADMM‐8:EmergingTechnologyasMitigation.Theprojectproponentmayrequest,withconsultationandapprovalfromagencies,replacementoraugmentationofcut‐inspeedincreaseswithdevelopingtechnologyoranothermitigationapproachthathasbeenproventoachievesimilarbatfatalityreductions.
Theprojectproponentmayalsorequestthesecondtierofadaptivemanagementtobetheadoptionofapromisingbutnotfullyproventechnologyormitigationmethod.TheserequestsaresubjecttoreviewandapprovalbytheTACandmustincludeacontrolledresearchcomponentdesignedbyaqualifiedprincipalinvestigatorsothattheeffectivenessofthemethodmaybeaccuratelyassessed.
Someexamplesofsuchemergingtechnologiesandresearchareasthatcouldbeincorporatedinadaptivemanagementplansarelistedbelow.
Theuseofacousticdeterrents(Arnettetal.2013:1).
Theuseofaltitude‐specificradar,nightvisionand/orothertechnologyallowingbatusemonitoringandassessmentofat‐riskbatbehavior(Johnstonetal.2013:90‐91)ifresearchintheseareasadvancessufficientlytoalloweffectiveapplicationofthesetechnologies.
Applicationofemergingpeer‐reviewedstudiesonbatbiology(suchasstudiesdocumentingmigratorycorridorsorbatbehaviorinrelationtoturbines)thatsupportspecificmitigationmethods.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐138
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14e:Compensateforexpensesincurredbyrehabilitatinginjuredbats
Thecostofreasonable,licensedrehabilitationeffortsforanyinjuredbatstakentowildlifecarefacilitiesfromtheprogramareawillbeassumedinfullbyprojectproponents.
ImpactBIO‐14a‐2:Turbine‐relatedfatalitiesofspecial‐statusandotherbats—programAlternative2:450MW(significantandunavoidable)
Residentandmigratorybatsflyinginandthroughtheprogramareamaybekilledbycollisionwithwindturbinebladesorotherinteractionwiththewindturbinegenerators.
Insufficientdataarecurrentlyavailabletodevelopaccuratefatalityestimatesforindividualbatspecies.FivebatspecieshavebeendocumentedinfatalitymonitoringprogramsintheAPWRA(InsigniaEnvironmental2012:48;Brownetal.2013:23;ICFInternational2012:3‐3),ofwhichtwo(westernredbatandhoarybat)arespecial‐statusspecies.Extrapolatingfromexistingfatalitydataandfromtrendsobservedatotherwindenergyfacilitieswherefourth‐generationturbinesareinoperation,itappearslikelythatfatalitieswouldoccurpredominantlyinthelatesummertomid‐fallmigrationperiod;thatfatalitieswouldconsistmostlyofmigratorybats,particularlyMexicanfree‐tailedbatandhoarybat;thatfatalitieswouldoccursporadicallyatothertimesofyear;andthatfatalitiesofoneormoreotherspecieswouldoccurinsmallernumbers.
DiabloWinds,BuenaVista,andVascoWindsaretheonlyrepoweredprojectsintheAPWRAforwhichestimatesofbatfatalityratesareavailable.Whiletheseratesvarywidely(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1067;InsigniaEnvironmental2012:65;Brownetal.2013:39),basedontheseestimates,batcollisionriskincreasessubstantiallywhenold‐generationturbinesarereplacedbynewer,largerturbines(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1068).TurbinesusedinfuturerepoweringprojectsarelikelytobesimilarinsizetotheVascoWindsturbinesbutmuchlargerthantheDiabloWindsandBuenaVistaturbinesinbothoverallsizeandratednameplatecapacity.ThereisevidencetosuggestthatlargerturbinessimilartothoseusedintheVascoWindsprojectwillresultinadditionalincreasesinbatfatalityratesforthosebatspeciescurrentlykilledintheAPWRA.
Somehypothesesfortheincreasedcollisionrisktomigratorybatspeciesatfourth‐generationturbinesaresummarizedbelow.
Batstendnottoflyathighwindspeeds.Thelowerwindspeedsatwhichfourth‐generationturbinesareabletoproducepowercreatemoreoverlapinthetimethatturbinesareoperatingandbatsareintheair.Inseveralstudies,themajorityoffatalitiesoccurredonnightsoflowerwindspeed(lessthan5.5meters/second[m/s])(Arnettetal.2008:73;Goodetal.2012:iv).Thiscorrelationsuggestsapossiblesourcefortheincreasedriskthatfourth‐generationturbinesposetobats.
Migratorytree‐roostingbatsmaybeattractedtothetubulartowerstructureofnewerturbines;thisattractionmayberelatedtomatingbehaviorduringmigration(Arnettetal.2008:73;Cryan2008:1).
Echolocationpulsesmaynotbeusedduringopen‐airmigratoryflight,ornotusedasoften,resultinginbatsbeingunawareofthehazardpresentedbytheturbineblades(Kunzetal.2007:319).
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐139
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Foraging,wateracquisition,roostselection,ormatingbehaviorduringmigrationseasonmaybringbatsthroughtherotor‐sweptareaoftallerturbinesmoreoften(CryanandBarclay2009:1333).
Tallerturbineshavebeendocumentedtokillmorebats.Theincreasedheightoffourth‐generationturbinesputstherotor‐sweptareaintobatflightpaths(Barclayetal2007:384).
Table3.4‐15providesacomparisonoftheestimatednumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurifold‐generationturbinesareallowedtocontinueoperatingattheircurrentlevelandtheestimatednumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurafterrepoweringoftheprogramareaandthetwoprojectareas.Duetothehighdegreeofuncertaintyinbatfatalityestimates,arangeofestimatesbasedonavailabledataispresented.Thelowestestimateisderivedfromthebestestimaterateof1.679fatalities/MW/yearreportedforthefirstyearofmonitoringattheVascoWindsrepoweringproject(Brownetal.2013:39).Theupperendofthisrangeiscalculatedusingthebatfatalityrateof3.92fatalities/MW/yearreportedfortheShilohIprojectintheMontezumaHillsWindResourceArea.Thebaselineestimateisderivedfromthebatfatalityrateof0.263fatalities/MW/yearreportedfortheAPWRAfor2005–2007(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1066).AsshowninTable3.4‐15,annualestimatedbatfatalitiesintheprogramareafromimplementationofAlternative2areanticipatedtoincreasefromthecurrentestimateof87to756–1,764fatalities.
Despitethehighlevelofuncertaintyinestimatesofbatfatalityrates,allavailabledatasuggestthatrepoweringwouldresultinasubstantialincreaseinbatfatalities.Thedegreeofincreasemaybeinfluencedbythefollowingfactors.
Turbineplacementinareasofhighautumnbatactivityoralongmigrationroutes.
Turbineplacementalongcommutingflywaystokeyresources(e.g.,roosts,water,foraginghabitat).
Behavioroftheturbinemodelbeforeitcutsin(i.e.,whetherbladesareallowedtospinatlowerwindspeeds)(Goodetal.2012:v).
MitigationMeasuresBIO‐14athroughBIO‐14ewouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14b:Implementpostconstructionbatfatalitymonitoringprogramforallrepoweringprojects
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14c:Prepareandpublishannualmonitoringreportsonthefindingsofbatuseoftheprojectareaandfatalitymonitoringresults
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14e:Compensateforexpensesincurredbyrehabilitatinginjuredbats
ImpactBIO‐14b:Turbine‐relatedfatalitiesofspecial‐statusandotherbats—GoldenHillsProject(significantandunavoidable)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐140
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ResidentandmigratorybatsflyinginandthroughtheGoldenHillsprojectareamaybekilledbycollisionwithwindturbinebladesorotherinteractionwiththewindturbinegenerators.Repoweringintheprojectareawouldintroduceincreasedfatalityrisk,particularlytomigratorybats.
Extrapolatingfromexistingfatalitydataandfromtrendsobservedatotherwindenergyfacilitieswherefourth‐generationturbinesareinoperation,itappearslikelythatfatalitieswouldoccurpredominantlyinthelatesummertomid‐fallmigrationperiod;thatfatalitieswouldconsistmostlyofmigratorybats,particularlyMexicanfree‐tailedbatandhoarybat;thatfatalitieswouldoccursporadicallyatothertimesofyear;andthatfatalitiesofoneormoreotherspecieswilloccurinsmallernumbers.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,annualestimatedbatfatalitiesintheGoldenHillsprojectareaareanticipatedtoincreasefromthecurrentestimateof23to148–347fatalities.MitigationMeasuresBIO‐14athroughBIO‐14ewouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14b:Implementpostconstructionbatfatalitymonitoringprogramforallrepoweringprojects
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14c:Prepareandpublishannualmonitoringreportsonthefindingsofbatuseoftheprojectareaandfatalitymonitoringresults
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14e:Compensateforexpensesincurredbyrehabilitatinginjuredbats
ImpactBIO‐14c:Turbine‐relatedfatalitiesofspecial‐statusandotherbats—PattersonPassProject(significantandunavoidable)
ResidentandmigratorybatsflyinginandthroughthePattersonPassprojectareamaybekilledbycollisionwithwindturbinebladesorotherinteractionwiththewindturbinegenerators.Repoweringintheprojectareawouldintroduceincreasedfatalityrisk,particularlytomigratorybats.
Extrapolatingfromexistingfatalitydataandfromtrendsobservedatotherwindenergyfacilitieswherefourth‐generationturbinesareinoperation,itappearslikelythatfatalitieswouldoccurpredominantlyinthelatesummertomid‐fallmigrationperiod;thatfatalitieswouldconsistmostlyofmigratorybats,particularlyMexicanfree‐tailedbatandhoarybat;thatfatalitieswouldoccursporadicallyatothertimesofyear;andthatfatalitiesofoneormoreotherspecieswilloccurinsmallernumbers.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,annualestimatedbatfatalitiesinthePattersonPassprojectareaareanticipatedtoincreasefromthecurrentestimateof5to33–78fatalities.MitigationMeasuresBIO‐14athroughBIO‐14ewouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐141
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14b:Implementpostconstructionbatfatalitymonitoringprogramforallrepoweringprojects
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14c:Prepareandpublishannualmonitoringreportsonthefindingsofbatuseoftheprojectareaandfatalitymonitoringresults
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14e:Compensateforexpensesincurredbyrehabilitatinginjuredbats
ImpactBIO‐15a‐1:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonalkalimeadow—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingofexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroadstoaccommodatedecommissionandrepoweringactivities.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Directeffectswouldconsistoffillofalkalimeadowatlocationswhereroadscrossingthehabitatwouldbewidened.Indirecteffectscouldinvolvealteredhydrologyorrunoffofsedimentandothersubstancesduringroadconstructionactivities.Someeffects,suchasthoseduetorunoff,wouldbeavoidedandminimizedthroughimplementationoferosioncontrolBMPsandpostconstructionreclamation.Installationofnewandupgradedculvertswouldmaintainexistinghydrology.However,lossofalkalimeadowhabitatasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐15wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐15:Compensateforthelossofalkalimeadowhabitat
Ifalkalimeadowhabitatisfilledordisturbedaspartofarepoweringproject,theprojectproponentwillcompensateforthelossofthishabitattoensurenonetlossofhabitatfunctionsandvalues.Compensationratioswillbebasedonsite‐specificinformationanddeterminedthroughcoordinationwithstateandfederalagencies(CDFW,USFWS,USACE).Unlessspecifiedotherwisebyaresourceagency,thecompensationwillbeataminimum1:1ratio(1acrerestoredorcreatedforevery1acrefilled)andmaybeacombinationofonsiterestoration/creation,offsiterestoration,andmitigationcredits.Arestorationandmonitoringplanwillbedevelopedandimplemented.Theplanwilldescribehowalkalimeadowhabitatwillbecreatedandmonitored.
ImpactBIO‐15a‐2:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonalkalimeadow—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingofexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroadstoaccommodatedecommissionandrepoweringactivities.DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Directeffectswouldconsistoffillofalkalimeadowatlocationswhereroadscrossingthehabitatwouldbewidened.Indirecteffectscouldinvolvealteredhydrologyorrunoffofsedimentandothersubstancesduring
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐142
October 2014ICF 00323.08
roadconstructionactivities.Someeffects,suchasthoseduetorunoff,wouldbeavoidedandminimizedthroughimplementationoferosioncontrolBMPsandpostconstructionreclamation.Installationofnewandupgradedculvertswouldmaintainexistinghydrology.However,lossofalkalimeadowhabitatasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐15wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐15:Compensateforthelossofalkalimeadowhabitat
ImpactBIO‐15b:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonalkalimeadow—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Alkalimeadowcomprisesapproximately3%(145.69acres)oftheGoldenHillsprojectarea.Roadinfrastructureupgradesthatcouldaffectthishabitatwouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingofexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroadstoaccommodatedecommissionandrepoweringactivities.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Directeffectswouldconsistoffillofalkalimeadowatlocationswhereroadscrossingthehabitatwouldbewidened.Indirecteffectscouldinvolvealteredhydrologyorrunoffofsedimentandothersubstancesduringroadconstructionactivities.Someeffects,suchasthoseduetorunoff,wouldbeavoidedandminimizedthroughimplementationoferosioncontrolBMPsandpostconstructionreclamation.Installationofnewandupgradedculvertswouldmaintainexistinghydrology.However,lossofalkalimeadowhabitatasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.BecausespecificdesignshavenotbeendevelopedfortheGoldenHillsproject,itisnotpossibletoquantifythiseffect.However,ifalkalimeadowisaffectedbyroadinfrastructureupgrades,itwouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐15wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐15:Compensateforthelossofalkalimeadowhabitat
ImpactBIO‐15c:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonalkalimeadow—PattersonPass(noimpact)
BecausenoalkalimeadowoccursinthePattersonPassprojectarea,therewouldbenoimpact.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐16a‐1:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonriparianhabitat—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingofexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroadstoaccommodatedecommissionandrepoweringactivities.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Lossofriparianhabitatasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐16wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐16:Compensateforthelossofriparianhabitat
Ifriparianhabitatisfilledorremovedaspartofaproject,theprojectproponentwillcompensateforthelossofriparianhabitattoensurenonetlossofhabitatfunctionsandvalues.Compensationratioswillbebasedonsite‐specificinformationanddeterminedthrough
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐143
October 2014ICF 00323.08
coordinationwithstateandfederalagencies(CDFW,USFWS,USACE).Thecompensationwillbeataminimum1:1ratio(1acrerestoredorcreatedforevery1acrefilled)andmaybeacombinationofonsiterestoration/creation,offsiterestoration,andmitigationcredits.Arestorationandmonitoringplanwillbedevelopedandimplemented.Theplanwilldescribehowriparianhabitatwillbecreatedandmonitored.
ImpactBIO‐16a‐2:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonriparianhabitat—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingofexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroadstoaccommodatedecommissionandrepoweringactivities.DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Lossofriparianhabitatasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐16wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐16:Compensateforthelossofriparianhabitat
ImpactBIO‐16b:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonriparianhabitat—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingofexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroadstoaccommodatedecommissionandrepoweringactivities.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Lossofriparianhabitatasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.BecausespecificdesignshavenotbeendevelopedfortheGoldenHillsproject,itisnotpossibletoquantifythiseffect.However,ifriparianhabitatisaffectedbyroadinfrastructureupgrades,itwouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐16wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐16:Compensateforthelossofriparianhabitat
ImpactBIO‐16c:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonriparianhabitat—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Undercurrentdesign,noriparianhabitatwouldbeaffectedbyroadinfrastructureupgrades.However,iffinaldesignwouldresultinriparianhabitatbeingaffectedbyroadinfrastructureupgrades,itwouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐16wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐16:Compensateforthelossofriparianhabitat
ImpactBIO‐17a‐1:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultindirectadverseeffectsoncommonhabitats—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificant)
Ground‐disturbingactivitieswouldresultinthepermanentlossofcommonhabitatsasaresultofconstructingnewpermanentfacilitiesandthetemporarylossofcommonhabitatsasaresultof
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐144
October 2014ICF 00323.08
constructingtemporaryfacilitiesandlandscapereclamation.Theseactivitieswouldcreateminorchangesintotalacreageofcommonhabitatsintheprojectarea,primarilyintheannualgrasslandplantcommunity.
Alllandsdisturbedbyinfrastructureinstallationorremovalwouldbereturnedtopreprojectconditions.Ateachreclamationsite,thetopographywouldbecontourgraded(ifnecessaryandifenvironmentallybeneficial),stabilized,andreseededwithanappropriateseedmixturetomaintainslopestability.ReclamationactivitieswouldbeguidedbyareclamationplandevelopedincoordinationwiththeCountyandotherapplicableagencies.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐17a‐2:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultindirectadverseeffectsoncommonhabitats—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificant)
Ground‐disturbingactivitieswouldresultinthepermanentlossofcommonhabitatsasaresultofconstructingnewpermanentfacilitiesandthetemporarylossofcommonhabitatsasaresultofconstructingtemporaryfacilitiesandlandscapereclamation.Theseactivitieswouldcreateminorchangesintotalacreageofcommonhabitatsintheprojectarea,primarilyintheannualgrasslandplantcommunity.
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Alllandsdisturbedbyinfrastructureinstallationorremovalwouldbereturnedtopreprojectconditions.Ateachreclamationsite,thetopographywouldbecontourgraded(ifnecessaryandifenvironmentallybeneficial),stabilized,andreseededwithanappropriateseedmixturetomaintainslopestability.ReclamationactivitieswouldbeguidedbyareclamationplandevelopedincoordinationwiththeCountyandotherapplicableagencies.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐17b:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultindirectadverseeffectsoncommonhabitats—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificant)
Ground‐disturbingactivitieswouldresultinthepermanentlossofcommonhabitatsasaresultofconstructingnewpermanentfacilitiesandthetemporarylossofcommonhabitatsasaresultofconstructingtemporaryfacilitiesandlandscapereclamation.Theseactivitieswouldcreateminorchangesintotalacreageofcommonhabitatsintheprojectarea,primarilyintheannualgrasslandplantcommunity.
Alllandsdisturbedbyinfrastructureinstallationorremovalwouldbereturnedtopreprojectconditions.Ateachreclamationsite,thetopographywouldbecontourgraded(ifnecessaryandifenvironmentallybeneficial),stabilized,andreseededwithanappropriateseedmixturetomaintainslopestability.ReclamationactivitieswouldbeguidedbyareclamationplandevelopedincoordinationwiththeCountyandotherapplicableagencies.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐17c:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultindirectadverseeffectsoncommonhabitats—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificant)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐145
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Ground‐disturbingactivitieswouldresultinthepermanentlossofcommonhabitatsasaresultofconstructingnewpermanentfacilitiesandthetemporarylossofcommonhabitatsasaresultofconstructingtemporaryfacilitiesandlandscapereclamation.Theseactivitieswouldcreateminorchangesintotalacreageofcommonhabitatsintheprojectarea,primarilyintheannualgrasslandplantcommunity.
Alllandsdisturbedbyinfrastructureinstallationorremovalwouldbereturnedtopreprojectconditions.Ateachreclamationsite,thetopographywouldbecontourgraded(ifnecessaryandifenvironmentallybeneficial),stabilized,andreseededwithanappropriateseedmixturetomaintainslopestability.ReclamationactivitieswouldbeguidedbyareclamationplandevelopedincoordinationwiththeCountyandotherapplicableagencies.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐18a‐1:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonwetlands—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingoftheexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroads.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Directeffectswouldincludefillofwetlandsatlocationswhereroadscrossingthehabitatwouldbewidened.Indirecteffectscouldincludealteredhydrologyorrunoffofsedimentandothersubstancesduringroadconstructionactivities.Someeffects,suchasthoseduetorunoff,wouldbeavoidedandminimizedthroughtheimplementationoferosioncontrolBMPsandpostconstructionreclamation.Installationofnewandupgradedculvertswouldmaintainexistinghydrology.However,lossofwetlandsasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐18:Compensateforthelossofwetlands
Ifwetlandsarefilledordisturbedaspartofaproject,theprojectproponentwillcompensateforthelosstoensurenonetlossofhabitatfunctionsandvalues.Compensationratioswillbebasedonsite‐specificinformationanddeterminedthroughcoordinationwithstateandfederalagencies(CDFW,USFWS,USACE).Thecompensationwillbeataminimum1:1ratio(1acrerestoredorcreatedforevery1acrefilled)andmaybeacombinationofonsiterestoration/creation,offsiterestoration,andmitigationcredits.Arestorationandmonitoringplanwillbedevelopedandimplemented.Theplanwilldescribehowwetlandswillbecreatedandmonitored.
ImpactBIO‐18a‐2:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonwetlands—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingoftheexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroads.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Directeffectswouldincludefillofwetlandsatlocationswhereroadscrossingthehabitatwouldbewidened.Indirecteffectscouldincludealteredhydrologyorrunoffofsedimentandothersubstancesduringroadconstructionactivities.Someeffects,suchasthoseduetorunoff,wouldbeavoidedandminimizedthroughtheimplementationoferosioncontrolBMPsandpostconstructionreclamation.Installationofnewandupgradedculvertswouldmaintain
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐146
October 2014ICF 00323.08
existinghydrology.DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.However,lossofwetlandsasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐18:Compensateforthelossofwetlands
ImpactBIO‐18b:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonwetlands—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingoftheexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroads.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Directeffectswouldincludefillofwetlandsatlocationswhereroadscrossingthehabitatwouldbewidened.Indirecteffectscouldincludealteredhydrologyorrunoffofsedimentandothersubstancesduringroadconstructionactivities.Someeffects,suchasthoseduetorunoff,wouldbeavoidedandminimizedthroughtheimplementationoferosioncontrolBMPsandpostconstructionreclamation.Installationofnewandupgradedculvertswouldmaintainexistinghydrology.However,lossofwetlandsasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐18:Compensateforthelossofwetlands
ImpactBIO‐18c:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonwetlands—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingoftheexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroads.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Directeffectswouldincludefillofwetlandsatlocationswhereroadscrossingthehabitatwouldbewidened.Indirecteffectscouldincludealteredhydrologyorrunoffofsedimentandothersubstancesduringroadconstructionactivities.Someeffects,suchasthoseduetorunoff,wouldbeavoidedandminimizedthroughtheimplementationoferosioncontrolBMPsandpostconstructionreclamation.Installationofnewandupgradedculvertswouldmaintainexistinghydrology.However,lossofwetlandsasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐18:Compensateforthelossofwetlands
ImpactBIO‐19a‐1:Potentialimpactonthemovementofanynativeresidentormigratorywildlifespeciesorestablishednativeresidentormigratorywildlifecorridors,andtheuseofnativewildlifenurserysites—programAlternative1:417MW(significantandunavoidable)
Manycommonwildlifespecies(e.g.,groundsquirrels,voles,deer,coyote,raccoon,skunk)andspecial‐statuswildlifespecies(e.g.,Californiared‐leggedfrog,Alamedawhipsnake,American
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐147
October 2014ICF 00323.08
badger)arelikelytooccurinandmovethroughtheprogramarea.Constructionactivitiesassociatedwiththeprogramandfencingofworkareasmaytemporarilyimpedewildlifemovementthroughtheworkareaorcauseanimalstotravellongerdistancestoavoidtheworkarea.Thiscouldresultinhigherenergyexpenditureandincreasedsusceptibilitytopredationforsomespeciesandisapotentiallysignificantimpact.Becausetheconstructionperiodforindividualprojectsintherepoweringprogramwouldbe9monthsforatypical80MWproject,itwouldlikelyencompassthemovement/migrationperiodforsomespecies(e.g.,Californiatigersalamandermovementto/frombreedingponds).Inparticular,smalleranimals,whoseenergyexpenditurestotravelaroundoravoidtheareawouldbegreaterthanforlargeranimals,couldbemoreseverelyaffected.Uponcompletionoftheprogram,thenewwindturbineswouldbespacedapartandwouldnotbeabarriertoon‐the‐groundwildlifemovement.Additionally,therewouldbefewerturbinesontheground,andanetincreaseintheamountofnaturalareawouldresultfromtherestorationofdecommissionedturbinepadsandfoundations.Thisremovalofturbinesandincreaseofnaturalareawouldpartiallycompensateforthisimpact.Asdiscussedaboveforspecial‐statusspecies,theprogramhasthepotentialtoaffectnativewildlifenurserysites(i.e.,breedingareas).Becausecommonspeciesmayalsousethesebreedingareas,theymayalsobeaffectedbytheprogram.Thiswouldconstituteasignificanteffect.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐5a,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,andBIO‐10awouldavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwildlifenurseryareasforspecial‐statusandcommonwildlifespecies.
Asdiscussedabove,theoperationofwindturbinesafterrepoweringwouldadverselyaffectraptors,otherbirds,andbatsmigratingthroughandwinteringintheprogramareabecausetheycouldbeinjuredorkillediftheyflythroughtherotorplaneofoperatingwindturbines.Asdiscussedabove,thiswouldbeasignificantandunavoidableimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐11b,BIO‐11c,BIO‐11d,BIO‐11e,BIO‐11i,BIO‐12a,BIO‐12b,BIO‐14a,andBIO‐14dwouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel.Accordingly,thisimpactwouldbesignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐148
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
ImpactBIO‐19a‐2:Potentialimpactonthemovementofanynativeresidentormigratorywildlifespeciesorestablishednativeresidentormigratorywildlifecorridors,andtheuseofnativewildlifenurserysites—programAlternative2:450MW(significantandunavoidable)
EffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Manycommonwildlifespecies(e.g.,groundsquirrels,voles,deer,coyote,raccoon,skunk)andspecial‐statuswildlifespecies(e.g.,Californiared‐leggedfrog,Alamedawhipsnake,Americanbadger)arelikelytooccurinandmovethroughtheprogramarea.Constructionactivitiesassociatedwiththeprogramandfencingofworkareasmaytemporarilyimpedewildlifemovementthroughtheworkareaorcauseanimalstotravellongerdistancestoavoidtheworkarea.Thiscouldresultinhigherenergyexpenditureandincreasedsusceptibilitytopredationforsomespeciesandisapotentiallysignificantimpact.Becausetheconstructionperiodforindividualprojectsintherepoweringprogramwouldbe9monthsforatypical80MWproject,itwouldlikelyencompassthemovement/migrationperiodforsomespecies(e.g.,Californiatigersalamandermovementto/frombreedingponds).Inparticular,smalleranimals,whoseenergyexpenditurestotravelaroundoravoidtheareawouldbegreaterthanforlargeranimals,couldbemoreseverelyaffected.Uponcompletionoftheprogram,thenewwindturbineswouldbespacedapartandwouldnotbeabarriertoon‐the‐groundwildlifemovement.Additionally,therewouldbefewerturbinesonthe
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐149
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ground,andanetincreaseintheamountofnaturalareawouldresultfromtherestorationofdecommissionedturbinepadsandfoundations.Thisremovalofturbinesandincreaseofnaturalareawouldpartiallycompensateforthisimpact.Asdiscussedaboveforspecial‐statusspecies,theprogramhasthepotentialtoaffectnativewildlifenurserysites(i.e.,breedingareas).Becausecommonspeciesmayalsousethesebreedingareas,theymayalsobeaffectedbytheprogram.Thiswouldconstituteasignificanteffect.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐5a,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,andBIO‐10awouldavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwildlifenurseryareasforspecial‐statusandcommonwildlifespecies.
Asdiscussedabove,theoperationofwindturbinesafterrepoweringwouldadverselyaffectraptors,otherbirds,andbatsmigratingthroughandwinteringintheprogramareabecausetheycouldbeinjuredorkillediftheyflythroughtherotorplaneofoperatingwindturbines.Asdiscussedabove,thiswouldbeasignificantandunavoidableimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐11b,BIO‐11c,BIO‐11d,BIO‐11e,BIO‐11j,BIO‐12a,BIO‐12b,BIO‐14a,andBIO‐14dwouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel.Accordingly,thisimpactwouldbesignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐150
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
ImpactBIO‐19b:Potentialimpactonthemovementofanynativeresidentormigratoryfishorwildlifespeciesorwithestablishednativeresidentormigratorywildlifecorridors,orimpedetheuseofnativewildlifenurserysites—GoldenHillsProject(significantandunavoidable)
Manycommonwildlifespecies(e.g.,groundsquirrels,voles,deer,coyote,raccoon,skunk)andspecial‐statuswildlifespecies(e.g.,Californiared‐leggedfrog,Alamedawhipsnake,Americanbadger)arelikelytooccurinandmovethroughtheGoldenHillsprojectarea.ConstructionactivitiesassociatedwiththeGoldenHillsProjectandfencingofworkareasmaytemporarilyimpedewildlifemovementthroughtheworkareaorcauseanimalstotravellongerdistancestoavoidtheworkarea.Thiscouldresultinhigherenergyexpenditureandincreasedsusceptibilitytopredationforsomespeciesandisapotentiallysignificantimpact.Becausetheconstructionperiodisanticipatedtolast9months,itwouldlikelyencompassthemovement/migrationperiodforsomespecies(e.g.,Californiatigersalamandermovementto/frombreedingponds).Inparticular,smalleranimals,whoseenergyexpenditurestotravelaroundoravoidtheareawouldbegreaterthanforlargeranimals,couldbemoreseverelyaffected.Uponcompletionofprojectconstruction,thenewwindturbineswouldbespacedapartandwouldnotbeabarriertoon‐the‐groundwildlifemovement.Additionally,therewouldbefewerturbinesontheground,andanetincreaseintheamountofnaturalareawouldresultfromtherestorationofdecommissionedturbinepadsandfoundations.Thisremovalofturbinesandincreaseofnaturalareawouldpartiallycompensateforthisimpact.Asdiscussedaboveforspecial‐statusspecies,theGoldenHillsProjecthasthepotentialtoaffectnativewildlifenurserysites(i.e.,breedingareas).Becausecommonspeciesmayalsousethesebreedingareas,theymayalsobeaffectedbytheproject.Thiswouldconstituteasignificanteffect.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐5a,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,andBIO‐10awouldavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwildlifenurseryareasforspecial‐statusandcommonwildlifespecies.
Asdiscussedabove,theoperationofwindturbinesafterrepoweringwouldadverselyaffectraptors,otherbirds,andbatsmigratingthroughandwinteringintheprojectareabecausetheycouldbeinjuredorkillediftheyflythroughtherotorplaneofoperatingwindturbines.Thiswouldbeasignificantandunavoidableimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐11b,BIO‐11c,BIO‐11d,BIO‐11e,BIO‐11i,BIO‐12a,BIO‐12b,BIO‐14a,andBIO‐14dwouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐151
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐152
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
ImpactBIO‐19c:Potentialimpactonthemovementofanynativeresidentormigratoryfishorwildlifespeciesorwithestablishednativeresidentormigratorywildlifecorridors,orimpedetheuseofnativewildlifenurserysites—PattersonPassProject(significantandunavoidable)
Manycommonwildlifespecies(e.g.,groundsquirrels,voles,deer,coyote,raccoon,skunk)andspecial‐statuswildlifespecies(e.g.,Californiared‐leggedfrog,Alamedawhipsnake,Americanbadger)arelikelytooccurinandmovethroughthePattersonPassprojectarea.ConstructionactivitiesassociatedwiththePattersonPassProjectandfencingofworkareasmaytemporarilyimpedewildlifemovementthroughtheworkareaorcauseanimalstotravellongerdistancestoavoidtheworkarea.Thiscouldresultinhigherenergyexpenditureandincreasedsusceptibilitytopredationforsomespeciesandisapotentiallysignificantimpact.Becausetheconstructionperiodisanticipatedtolast6–9months,itwouldlikelyencompassthemovement/migrationperiodforsomespecies(e.g.,Californiatigersalamandermovementto/frombreedingponds).Inparticular,smalleranimals,whoseenergyexpenditurestotravelaroundoravoidtheareawouldbegreaterthanforlargeranimals,couldbemoreseverelyaffected.Uponcompletionofprojectconstruction,thenewwindturbineswouldbespacedapartandwouldnotbeabarriertoon‐the‐groundwildlifemovement.Additionally,therewouldbefewerturbinesontheground,andanetincreaseintheamountofnaturalareawouldresultfromtherestorationofdecommissionedturbinepadsandfoundations.Thisremovalofturbinesandincreaseofnaturalareawouldpartiallycompensateforthisimpact.Asdiscussedaboveforspecial‐statusspecies,thePattersonPassProjecthasthepotentialtoaffectnativewildlifenurserysites(i.e.,breedingareas).Becausecommonspeciesmayalsousethesebreedingareas,theymayalsobeaffectedbytheproject.Thiswouldconstituteasignificanteffect.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐5a,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,andBIO‐10awouldavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwildlifenurseryareasforspecial‐statusandcommonwildlifespecies.
Asdiscussedabove,theoperationofwindturbinesafterrepoweringwouldadverselyaffectraptors,otherbirds,andbatsmigratingthroughandwinteringintheprojectareabecausetheycouldbeinjuredorkillediftheyflythroughtherotorplaneofoperatingwindturbines.Thiswouldbeasignificantandunavoidableimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐11b,BIO‐11c,BIO‐11d,BIO‐11e,BIO‐11i,BIO‐12a,BIO‐12b,BIO‐14a,andBIO‐14dwouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐153
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
ImpactBIO‐20a‐1:Conflictwithlocalplansorpolicies—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
TheECAPencouragesthepreservationofareasknowntosupportspecial‐statusspecies,nonetlossofriparianandseasonalwetlands,andprotectionofexistingriparianwoodlandhabitat.Additionally,theECAPhasseveralpoliciesrelatedtowindfarms,includingestablishingamitigationprogramtominimizetheimpactsofwindturbineoperationsonbirdpopulations.Lossofspecial‐statusspeciesandtheirhabitat,lossofalkalimeadow,lossofriparianhabitat,andlossofexistingwetlandsasaresultofimplementingtheprogramwouldbeinconflictwiththesepolicies.Thisimpactissignificant;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐4b,BIO5athrough5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐7b,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,BIO‐9,BIO10a,BIO‐10b,andBIO‐15,BIO‐16,andBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevelbecausethesemeasuresrequiretheprojectapplicanttominimizeimpactsonhabitatforspecial‐statusspeciesand
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐154
October 2014ICF 00323.08
compensateforthepermanentlossofsuitablehabitat,aswellastoensurethatanyimpactsonriparianandwetlandsarecompensatedfortoensurenonetlossofhabitatfunctionsandvalues.ThemitigationmeasuresfortheimpactsofwindturbineoperationsonbirdpopulationsfromtherepoweringprogramareconsistentwiththeestablishmentofamitigationprogramrecommendedbytheECAP.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1a:Conductsurveystodeterminethepresenceorabsenceofspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1c:Avoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspeciesbyestablishingactivityexclusionzones
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1d:Compensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Implementmeasurestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4b:Compensatefordirectandindirecteffectsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon‐special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐9:Compensateforthepermanentlossofforaginghabitatforwesternburrowingowl
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐155
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10b:CompensateforlossofsuitablehabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐15:Compensateforthelossofalkalimeadowhabitat
MitigationMeasureBIO‐16:Compensateforthelossofriparianhabitat
MitigationMeasureBIO‐18:Compensateforthelossofwetlands
ImpactBIO‐20a‐2:Conflictwithlocalplansorpolicies—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
TheECAPencouragesthepreservationofareasknowntosupportspecial‐statusspecies,nonetlossofriparianandseasonalwetlands,andprotectionofexistingriparianwoodlandhabitat.Additionally,theECAPhasseveralpoliciesrelatedtowindfarms,includingestablishingamitigationprogramtominimizetheimpactsofwindturbineoperationsonbirdpopulations.Lossofspecial‐statusspeciesandtheirhabitat,lossofalkalimeadow,lossofriparianhabitat,andlossofexistingwetlandsasaresultofimplementingtheprogramwouldbeinconflictwiththesepolicies.TheeffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Thisimpactissignificant;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐4b,BIO5athrough5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐7b,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,BIO‐9,BIO10a,BIO‐10b,andBIO‐15,BIO‐16,andBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevelbecausethesemeasuresrequiretheprojectapplicanttominimizeimpactsonhabitatforspecial‐statusspeciesandcompensateforthepermanentlossofsuitablehabitat,aswellastoensurethatanyimpactsonriparianandwetlandsarecompensatedfortoensurenonetlossofhabitatfunctionsandvalues.ThemitigationmeasuresfortheimpactsofwindturbineoperationsonbirdpopulationsfromtherepoweringprogramareconsistentwiththeestablishmentofamitigationprogramrecommendedbytheECAP.
ImpactBIO‐20b:Conflictwithlocalplansorpolicies—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
TheECAPencouragesthepreservationofareasknowntosupportspecial‐statusspecies,nonetlossofriparianandseasonalwetlands,andprotectionofexistingriparianwoodlandhabitat.Additionally,theECAPhasseveralpoliciesrelatedtowindfarms,includingestablishingamitigationprogramtominimizetheimpactsofwindturbineoperationsonbirdpopulations.Lossofspecial‐statusspeciesandtheirhabitat(ImpactsBIO‐1bthroughBIO‐10b),lossofalkalimeadow(ImpactBIO‐15b)lossofriparianhabitat(ImpactBIO‐16b),andlossofexistingwetlands(ImpactBIO‐18b)asaresultofimplementingtheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbeinconflictwiththesepolicies.Thisimpactissignificant;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐4b,BIO5athrough5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐7b,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,BIO‐9,BIO10a,BIO‐10b,andBIO‐15,BIO‐16,andBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevelbecausethesemeasuresrequiretheprojectapplicanttominimizeimpactsonhabitatforspecial‐statusspeciesandcompensateforthepermanentlossofsuitablehabitat,aswellasensurethatanyimpactson
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐156
October 2014ICF 00323.08
riparianandwetlandsarecompensatedfortoensurenonetlossofhabitatfunctionsandvalues.ThemitigationmeasuresfortheimpactsofwindturbineoperationsonbirdpopulationsfromtherepoweringprogramareconsistentwiththeestablishmentofamitigationprogramrecommendedbytheECAP.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1a:Conductsurveystodeterminethepresenceorabsenceofspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1c:Avoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspeciesbyestablishingactivityexclusionzones
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1d:Compensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Implementmeasurestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4b:Compensatefordirectandindirecteffectsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon‐special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐9:Compensateforthepermanentlossofforaginghabitatforwesternburrowingowl
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐157
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10b:CompensateforlossofsuitablehabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐15:Compensateforthelossofalkalimeadowhabitat
MitigationMeasureBIO‐16:Compensateforthelossofriparianhabitat
MitigationMeasureBIO‐18:Compensateforthelossofwetlands
ImpactBIO‐20c:Conflictwithlocalplansorpolicies—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
TheECAPencouragesthepreservationofareasknowntosupportspecial‐statusspecies,nonetlossofriparianandseasonalwetlands,andprotectionofexistingriparianwoodlandhabitat.Lossofspecial‐statusspeciesandtheirhabitat(ImpactsBIO‐1cthroughBIO‐6c),lossofalkalimeadow(ImpactBIO‐15c)lossofriparianhabitat(ImpactBIO‐16c),andlossofexistingwetlands(ImpactBIO‐18c)asaresultofimplementingthePattersonPassProjectwouldbeinconflictwiththesepolicies.Thisimpactissignificant;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐4b,BIO5athrough5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐7b,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,BIO‐9,BIO10a,BIO‐10b,andBIO‐15,BIO‐16,andBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevelbecausethesemeasuresrequiretheprojectapplicanttominimizeimpactsonhabitatforspecial‐statusspeciesandcompensateforthepermanentlossofsuitablehabitat,aswellasensurethatanyimpactsonriparianandwetlandsarecompensatedfortoensurenonetlossofhabitatfunctionsandvalues.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1a:Conductsurveystodeterminethepresenceorabsenceofspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1c:Avoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspeciesbyestablishingactivityexclusionzones
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1d:Compensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Implementmeasurestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐158
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4b:Compensatefordirectandindirecteffectsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon‐special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐9:Compensateforthepermanentlossofforaginghabitatforwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10b:CompensateforlossofsuitablehabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐16:Compensateforthelossofriparianhabitat
MitigationMeasureBIO‐18:Compensateforthelossofwetlands
ImpactBIO‐21a‐1:ConflictwithprovisionsofanadoptedHCP/NCCPorotherapprovedlocal,regional,orstatehabitatconservationplan—programAlternative1:417MW(noimpact)
TherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsapplicabletotheprogramarea.TheEACCS,whilenotaformalHCP,providesguidancefortheprojectplanningandpermittingprocesstoensurethatimpactsareoffsetinabiologicallyeffectivemanner.Asnotedabove,themitigationmeasuressetforthinthisPEIRarebasedonmeasuresfromtheEACCS,withsomemodificationsandadditions.BecausetherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsfortheprogramareaandtheprogramwouldnotconflictwiththeEACCS,therewouldbenoimpact.
ImpactBIO‐21a‐2:ConflictwithprovisionsofanadoptedHCP/NCCPorotherapprovedlocal,regional,orstatehabitatconservationplan—programAlternative2:450MW(noimpact)
TherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsapplicabletotheprogramarea.TheEACCS,whilenotaformalHCP,providesguidancefortheprojectplanningandpermittingprocesstoensurethatimpactsareoffsetinabiologicallyeffectivemanner.Asnotedabove,themitigationmeasuressetforthinthis
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐159
October 2014ICF 00323.08
PEIRarebasedonmeasuresfromtheEACCS,withsomemodificationsandadditions.BecausetherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsfortheprogramareaandtheprogramwouldnotconflictwiththeEACCS,therewouldbenoimpact.
ImpactBIO‐21b:ConflictwithprovisionsofanadoptedHCP/NCCPorotherapprovedlocal,regional,orstatehabitatconservationplan—GoldenHillsProject(noimpact)
TherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsapplicabletotheGoldenHillsprojectarea.TheEACCS,whilenotaformalHCP,providesguidancefortheprojectplanningandpermittingprocesstoensurethatimpactsareoffsetinabiologicallyeffectivemanner.Asnotedabove,themitigationmeasuressetforthinthisPEIRarebasedonmeasuresfromtheEACCS,withsomemodificationsandadditions.BecausetherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsfortheprojectareaandtheGoldenHillsProjectwouldnotconflictwiththeEACCS,therewouldbenoimpact.
ImpactBIO‐21c:ConflictwithprovisionsofanadoptedHCP/NCCPorotherapprovedlocal,regional,orstatehabitatconservationplan—PattersonPassProject(noimpact)
TherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsapplicabletothePattersonPassprojectarea.TheEACCS,whilenotaformalHCP,providesguidancefortheprojectplanningandpermittingprocesstoensurethatimpactsareoffsetinabiologicallyeffectivemanner.Asnotedabove,themitigationmeasuressetforthinthisPEIRarebasedonmeasuresfromtheEACCS,withsomemodificationsandadditions.BecausetherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsfortheprojectareaandthePattersonPassProjectwouldnotconflictwiththeEACCS,therewouldbenoimpact.
3.4.3 References Cited
Printed References
AlamedaCounty.Unpublisheddata.AvianUseDatabase.InformationgatheredaspartoftheongoingAvianFatalityMonitoringProgram.
———.2000.EastCountyAreaPlan.AdoptedMay1994.ModifiedbypassageofMeasureD,effectiveDecember22,2000.Oakland,CA.
AlamedaCountySRC.2010.GuidelinesforSitingWindTurbinesRecommendedforRelocationtoMinimizePotentialCollision‐RelatedMortalityofFourFocalRaptorSpeciesintheAltamontPassWindResourceArea.May23.AlamedaCountySRCDocumentP‐70.Available:http://www.altamontsrc.org/alt_doc/p70_src_relocation_guidelines.pdf.
Alarcón,M.,C.Aedo,andC.Navarro.2012.California.Page818inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.).TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Al‐Shehbaz,I.A.2012.Caulanthus.Pages535–538inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.).TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Alvarez,J.A.2004.OverwinteringCaliforniaTigerSalamander(Ambystomacaliforniense)Larvae.HerpetologicalReview35(4):344.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐160
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Anderson,R.L.,J.L.Dinsdale,andR.Schlorff.2007.CaliforniaSwainson'sHawkInventory:2005–2007.FinalReport.Sacramento,CA:DepartmentofFishandGameResourceAssessmentProgram,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
Anthony,E.L.P.,M.H.Stack,andT.H.Kunz.1981.NightRoostingandtheNocturnalTimeBudgetoftheLittleBrownBat,Myotislucifugus:EffectsofReproductiveStatus,PreyDensity,andEnvironmentalConditions.Oecologia51(2):151–156.
Arnett,E.B.,W.K.Brown,W.P.Erickson,J.K.Fiedler,B.L.Hamilton,T.H.Henry,A.Jain,G.D.Johnson,J.Kerns,R.R.Koford,C.P.Nicholson,T.J.O’Connell,M.D.Piorkowski,andR.D.Tankersley,Jr.2008.PatternsofBatFatalitiesatWindEnergyFacilitiesinNorthAmerica.JournalofWildlifeManagement72(1):61–78.
Arnett,E.B.,C.D.Hein,M.R.Schirmacher,M.M.P.Huso,andJ.M.Szewczak.2013.EvaluatingtheEffectivenessofanUltrasonicAcousticDeterrentforReducingBatFatalitiesatWindTurbines.PLOSONE8(6):e65794.
Arnett,E.B.,MSchirmacher,M.M.P.Huso,andJ.P.Hayes.2009.EffectivenessofChangingWindTurbineCut‐inSpeedtoReduceBatFatalitiesatWindFacilities—2008AnnualReport.April.AnnualreportsubmittedtotheBatsandWindEnergyCooperative.Austin,TX:BatConservationInternational.
AudubonSociety.2007.The2007AudubonWatchList.Available:http://birds.audubon.org/2007‐audubon‐watchlist.Accessed:May21,2014.
AudubonCalifornia.2010.BarnOwlNamedAudubonCalifornia’s2010BirdoftheYear:HugeWrite‐inEffortLandsWinsitforPopularOwlSpecies.YubaNet.com.December14.Available:http://yubanet.com/california/Barn‐Owl‐named‐Audubon‐California‐s‐2010‐Bird‐of‐the‐Year.php.AccessedMay21,2014.
AvianPowerLineInteractionCommittee.2006.SuggestedPracticesforAvianProtectiononPowerLines:TheStateoftheArtin2006.PIERFinalProjectReportCEC‐500‐2006‐022.Washington,DC,andSacramento,CA:EdisonElectricInstitute,APLIC,andtheCaliforniaEnergyCommission.
Baldwin,B.2012.Blepharizonia.P.262inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.).TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Barclay,R.M.R.,E.F.Baerwald,andJ.C.Gruver.2007.VariationinBatandBirdFatalitiesatWindEnergyFacilities:AssessingtheEffectsofRotorSizeandTowerHeight.CanadianJournalofZoology85:381–387.
BarnOwlBoxCompany.2009.BarnOwlsbyUSStates.Available:http://www.barnowlbox.com/us‐barn‐owl.html#california_barn_owls.AccessedMay21,2014.
Barr,C.B.1991.TheDistribution,Habitat,andStatusoftheValleyElderberryLonghornBeetle:Desmoceruscalifornicusdimorphus.U.S.FishandWildlifeService.Sacramento,CA.
Barry,S.J.,andH.B.Shaffer.1994.TheStatusoftheCaliforniaTigerSalamander(Ambystomacaliforniense)atLagunita:A50‐YearUpdate.JournalofHerpetology24(2):159–164.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐161
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Beedy,E.C.,andW.J.Hamilton,III.1997.TricoloredBlackbirdStatusUpdateandManagementGuidelines.PreparedforU.S.FishandWildlifeService,MigratoryBirdsandHabitatPrograms,andCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame,BirdandMammalConservationProgram.
———.1999.TricoloredBlackbird(Agelaiustricolor).InA.Poole,(ed.).TheBirdsofNorthAmericaOnline.Ithaca:CornellLabofOrnithology.Available:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/423.Accessed:February12,2012.
Bloom,P.H.1980.TheStatusoftheSwainson’sHawkinCalifornia.PreparedforTheResourcesAgency:DepartmentofFishandGameandUnitedStatesDepartmentoftheInterior,BureauofLandManagement.
Brode,J.M.,andR.B.Bury.1984.TheImportanceofRiparianSystemstoAmphibiansandReptiles.Pages30–36inR.E.WarnerandK.M.Hendrix(eds.).CaliforniaRiparianSystemsEcology,Conservation,andProductiveManagement.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Brown,P.E.,andE.D.Pierson.1996.NaturalHistoryandManagementofBatsinCaliforniaandNevada.WorkshopsponsoredbytheWesternSectionofTheWildlifeSociety.November13–15.
Brown,K.,K.S.Smallwood,andB.Karas.2013.VascoAvianandBatMonitoringProject2012–2013AnnualReport.Final.September.PreparedbyVentusEnvironmentalSolutions,Portland,OR.PreparedforNextEraEnergyResources,Livermore,CA.
Buehler,D.A.2000.BaldEagle.InA.Poole,(ed.).TheBirdsofNorthAmericaOnline.Ithaca:CornellLabofOrnithology.Available:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/506.
Bunn,D.S.,A.B.Warburton,andR.D.S.Wilson.1982.TheBarnOwl.Vermillion,SD:ButeoBooks.
Bunnell,S.T.,C.M.White,D.Paul,andS.D.Bunnell.1997.StickNestsonaBuildingandTransmissionTowersUsedforNestingbyLargeFalconsinUtah.GreatBasinNat.57:263–267.
Marti,C.D.1974.FeedingEcologyofFourSympatricOwls.Condor76:5–61.CaliforniaBatWorkingGroup.2006.GuidelinesforAssessingandMinimizingImpactstoBatsatWindEnergyDevelopmentSitesinCalifornia.September.
CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.1992.1992AnnualReportontheStatusofCaliforniaState‐ListedThreatenedandEndangeredAnimalsandPlants.Sacramento,CA.
———.1993.LosVaquerosProject‐FishandWildlifeImpacts.AStatusReport.
———.1994.StaffReportRegardingMitigationforImpactstoSwainson’sHawk(Buteoswainsoni)intheCentralValleyofCalifornia.Sacramento,CA.November1.
———.2008.CaliforniaAquaticInvasiveSpeciesManagementPlan.January.Sacramento,CA.
———.2009.ProtocolsforSurveyingandEvaluatingImpactstoSpecialStatusNativePlantPopulationsandNaturalCommunities.November24.Available:http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/survey_monitor.html.
———.2010.ListofVegetationAlliancesandAssociations.September.VegetationClassificationandMappingProgram.Sacramento,CA.Available:http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/vegcamp/natural_comm_list.asp.Accessed:December10,2013.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐162
October 2014ICF 00323.08
———.2011.SpecialAnimalsList.Available:http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb/pdfs/SPAnimals.pdf.Accessed:January2011.
———.2012.StaffReportonBurrowingOwlMitigation.StateofCaliforniaNaturalResourcesAgency.March7.
CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife.2013a.CaliforniaNaturalDiversityDatabase,RareFind4.(May3,2013update).Reportforalkalimeadow.Sacramento,CA.Accessed:May2013.
———.2013b.CaliforniaNaturalDiversityDatabase,RareFind4.(May3,2013update).Sacramento,CA.Searchof7.5‐minuteMidway,Altamont,CedarMountain,ByronHotSprings,andCliftonCourtForebayquadranglesforspecial‐statusplants.Sacramento,CA.Accessed:May2013.
———.2013c.CaliforniaNaturalDiversityDatabase,RareFind4.(July2,2013update).Sacramento,CA.Searchof7.5‐minuteMidway,Altamont,CedarMountain,ByronHotSprings,andCliftonCourtForebayquadranglesforspecial‐statusanimals.Sacramento,CA.Accessed:July26,2013.
CaliforniaEnergyCommissionandCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.2007.CaliforniaGuidelinesforReducingImpactstoBirdsandBatsfromWindEnergyDevelopment.October.CommissionFinalReport.CEC‐700‐2007‐008‐CMF.CaliforniaEnergyCommission,RenewablesCommittee,andEnergyFacilitiesSitingDivision,andCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame,ResourcesManagementandPolicyDivision.
CaliforniaEnvironmentalServices.2014.LosVaquerosWatershed2013AnnualGoldenEagleMonitoringReport.January.SanRamon,CA.PreparedforContraCostaWaterDistrict,Concord,CA.
CaliforniaHerps.com.2013.AGuidetotheAmphibiansandReptilesofCalifornia.RangeinformationforPhrynosomablainvillii,Blainville'sHornedLizard(CoastHornedLizard).Accessed:April8,2013.
CaliforniaRaptorCenter.2011.AdmissionsStatistics.Available:http://www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/calraptor/rescue_rehabilitation/admissions_stats.cfm.Accessed:November9,2011.
Carlsen,T.M.,L.E.Paterson,T.M.Alfaro,andS.D.Gregory.2012.RarePlantMonitoringandRestorationattheLawrenceLivermoreNationalLaboratoryExperimentalTestSite,Site300,ProjectProgressReport2007through2011.LLNL‐TR‐585933.Livermore,CA:LawrenceLivermoreNationalLaboratory.
Cowardin,L.M.,V.Carter,F.C.Golet,andE.T.LaRoe.1979.ClassificationofWetlandsandDeepwaterHabitatsoftheUnitedStates.OfficeofBiologicalServices,FishandWildlifeService,U.S.DepartmentoftheInterior,Washington,D.C.
Cryan,P.M.2008.MatingBehaviorasaPossibleCauseofBatFatalitiesatWindTurbines.April.JournalofWildlifeManagement72(3):845–849.
Cryan,P.M.,andR.M.R.Barclay.2009.CausesofBatFatalitiesatWindTurbines:HypothesesandPredictions.JournalofMammalogy90(6):1330–1340.
CurryandKerlinger,LLC.2009.AvianMonitoringStudyandRiskAssessmentfortheShilohIIIWindPowerProject,SolanoCounty,California.December.McLean,VA.PreparedforenXco,Inc.,Tracy,CA.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐163
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Dunk,J.R.1995.White‐TailedKite(Elanusleucurus).InA.Poole,(ed.).TheBirdsofNorthAmericaOnline.Ithaca:CornellLabofOrnithology.Available:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/178.
EastBayRegionalParksDistrict.2000.VascoCavesRegionalPreserveResourceManagementPlan.PreparedbyEastBayRegionalParksDistrictPlanning/StewardshipDepartmentinCooperationwithContraCostaWaterDistrict.Oakland,CA.
Eng,L.L,D.Belk,andC.H.Eriksen.1990.CalifornianAnostraca:Distribution,Habitat,andStatus.JournalofCrustaceanBiology10(2):247–277.
Eriksen,C.H.,andD.Belk.1999.FairyShrimpsofCalifornia’sPuddles,Pools,andPlayas.Eureka,CA:MadRiverPress.
EssigMuseumofEntomology.2013.California’sEndangeredInsects:Curve‐FootedDivingBeetle.EssigMuseumofEntomology,UniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley.Available:http://essig.berkeley.edu/endins/hygcurve1.htm.Accessed:August5,2013.
Estep,J.A.1989.Biology,Movements,andHabitatRelationshipsoftheSwainson’sHawkintheCentralValleyofCalifornia,1986–1987.CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame,NongameBirdandMammalSection.Sacramento,CA.
Fellers,G.M.,A.Launer,G.Rathbun,S.Bobzien,J.Alvarez,D.Sterner,R.B.Seymour,andM.Westphal.2001.OverwinteringTadpolesintheCaliforniaRed‐LeggedFrog(Ranaauroradraytonii).HerpetologicalReview32(3):156157.
Gehring,J.,P.Kerlinger,andA.M.ManvilleII.2009.CommunicationTowers,Lights,andBirds:SuccessfulMethodsofReducingtheFrequencyofAvianCollisions.EcologicalApplications19:505–514.
Good,R.E.,W.Erickson,A.Merrill,S.Simon,K.Murray,K.Bay,andC.Fritchman.2011.BatMonitoringStudiesattheFowlerRidgeWindEnergyFacility,BentonCounty,Indiana—April13–October15,2010.January28.PreparedforFowlerRidgeWindFarm.Cheyenne,WY:WesternEcoSystemsTechnology,Inc.
Good,R.E.,A.Merrill,S.Simon,K.Murray,andK.Bay.2012.BatMonitoringStudiesattheFowlerRidgeWindFarm,BentonCounty,Indiana—April1–October31,2011.January31.PreparedforFowlerRidgeWindFarm.Bloomington,IN:WesternEcoSystemsTechnology,Inc.
Goodrich,L.J.,andJ.Smith.2008.RaptorMigrationinNorthAmerica.InK.L.Bildstein,J.Smith,andE.Ruelas(eds.),TheStateofNorthAmerica’sBirdsofPrey(.SeriesinOrnithologyNumber3.Orwigsburg,PA:HawkMountainSanctuary,.
Haak,B.A.,andS.J.Denton.1979.SubterraneanNestingbyPrairieFalcon.RaptorRes.13:121–122.
Hamilton,W.J.,III.2000.TricoloredBlackbird2000SurveyandPopulationAnalysis.PreparedforU.S.FishandWildlifeService,Portland,OR.
Hanes,T.L.1977.CaliforniaChaparral.Pages41–469inM.G.BarbourandJ.Major(eds.).TerrestrialVegetationofCalifornia.NY:JohnWileyandSons.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐164
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Hannan,G.L.,andC.Clark.2012.Eschscholzia.Pages982–984inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.),TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
HawkMountain.2007.ConservationStatusReportsfortheAmericanKestrelandRed‐TailedHawk.Available:http://www.hawkmountain.org/raptorpedia/hawks‐at‐hawk‐mountain/hawk‐species‐at‐hawk‐mountain/hawk‐species‐at‐hawk‐mountain/page.aspx?id=344.Accessed:May14,2014.
Helm,B.1998.BiogeographyofEightLargeBranchiopodsEndemictoCalifornia.Pages124–139inC.W.Witham,E.T.Bauder,D.Belk,W.R.Ferren,Jr.,andR.Ornduf(eds.).Ecology,Conservation,andManagementofVernalPoolEcosystems—Proceedingsfroma1996Conference.Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaNativePlantSociety.285pages.
Holland,R.F.1986.PreliminaryDescriptionsoftheTerrestrialNaturalCommunitiesofCalifornia.CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame,Sacramento,CA.
Howell,J.A.1997.AvianMortalityatRotorSweptAreaEquivalents,AltamontPassandMontezumaHills,California.TransactionsoftheWesternSectionoftheWildlifeSociety33:24–29.
Howell,J.A.,andJ.E.DiDonato.1991.AssessmentofAvianUseandMortalityRelatedtoWindTurbineOperations,AltamontPass,AlamedaandContraCostaCounties,California,September1998throughAugust1989.Final.SubmittedtoU.S.Windpower,Inc.Livermore,CA.
Hull,J.M.,R.Anderson,M.Bradbury,J.A.Estep,andH.B.Ernest.2008.PopulationStructureandGeneticDiversityinSwainson’sHawks(ButeoSwainsoni):ImplicationsforConservation.ConservationGenetics9(2):305–316.
Hunt,G.2002.TheTrendofGoldenEagleTerritoryOccupancyintheVicinityoftheAltamontPassWindResourceArea:2005Survey.PreparedfortheCaliforniaEnergyCommission,contract500‐01‐032,tothePredatoryBirdResearchGroup,UniversityofCalifornia,SantaCruz.
Hunt,G.,andT.Hunt.2006.TheTrendofGoldenEagleTerritoryOccupancyintheVicinityoftheAltamontPassWindResourceArea:2005Survey.PreparedfortheCaliforniaEnergyCommission,contract500‐01‐032,tothePredatoryBirdResearchGroup,UniversityofCalifornia,SantaCruz,CA.ReporttoCaliforniaEnergyCommission,Sacramento,CA.
Hunt,W.G.,R.E.Jackman,T.L.Brown,D.E.Driscoll,andL.Culp.1999.APopulationStudyofGoldenEaglesintheAltamontPassWindResourceArea:PopulationTrendAnalysis1994–1997.PreparedfortheNationalRenewableEnergyLaboratory,subcontractXAT‐6‐16459‐01tothePredatoryBirdResearchGroup,UniversityofCalifornia,SantaCruz.
ICFInternational.2010.EastAlamedaCountyConservationStrategy.Final.October.(ICF00906.08.)SanJose,CA.PreparedforEastAlamedaCountyConservationStrategySteeringCommittee,Livermore,CA.
———.2012.AltamontPassWindResourceAreaBirdFatalityStudy,BirdYears2005–2010.October.(ICF00904.08.)Sacramento,CA.PreparedforAlamedaCountyCommunityDevelopmentAgency,Hayward,CA.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐165
October 2014ICF 00323.08
———.2013.AltamontPassWindResourceAreaBirdFatalityStudy,BirdYears2005–2011.November.M87.(ICF00904.08.)Sacramento,CA.PreparedforAlamedaCountyCommunityDevelopmentAgency,Hayward,CA.
InsigniaEnvironmental.2012.FinalReportfortheBuenaVistaAvianandBatMonitoringProject:February2008toJanuary2011.September.PaloAlto,CA.PreparedforContraCostaCounty,Martinez,CA.
Jennings,M.R.,andM.P.Hayes.1994.AmphibianandReptileSpeciesofSpecialConcerninCalifornia.RanchoCordova,CA:CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
Jennings,M.R.,M.P.Hayes,andD.C.Holland.1992.APetitiontotheU.S.FishandWildlifeServicetoPlacetheCaliforniaRed‐LeggedFrog(Ranaauroradraytonii)andtheWesternPondTurtle(Clemmysmarmorata)ontheListofEndangeredandThreatenedWildlifeandPlants.
Johnsgard,P.A.1990.Hawks,EaglesandFalconsofNorthAmerica:BiologyandNaturalHistory.WashingtonandLondon:SmithsonianInstitutionPress.
Johnson,L.A.2012.Navarretia.Pages1062–1068inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.).TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Johnston,D.S.,J.A.Howell,S.B.Terrill,N.Thorngate,J.Castle,J.P.Smith(H.T.Harvey&Associates);T.J.Mabee,J.H.Plissner,N.A.Schwab,P.M.Sanzenbacher,andC.M.Grinnell(ABR,Inc.).2013.BirdandBatMovementPatternsandMortalityattheMontezumaHillsWindResourceArea.June.CEC‐500‐2013‐015.Available:http://www.solanocounty.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?blobid=10104.PreparedbyH.T.Harvey&Associates.PreparedfortheCaliforniaEnergyCommission.
Kelley,R.N.,andF.R.Ganders.2012.Amsinckia.Pages453–454inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.).TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Kochert,M.N.,K.Steenhof,C.L.McIntyre,andE.H.Craig.2002.GoldenEagle(Aquilachrysaetos).InA.PooleandF.Gill(eds.).TheBirdsofNorthAmerica,No.684.Philadelphia,PA:TheBirdsofNorthAmerica,Inc.
Koontz,J.A.,andM.J.Warnock.2012.Delphinium.Pages1136–1142inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.).TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Kunz,T.H.,E.B.Arnett,W.P.Erickson,A.R.Hoar,G.D.Johnson,R.P.Larkin,M.D.Strickland,R.W.Thresher,andM.D.Tuttle.2007.EcologicalImpactsofWindEnergyDevelopmentonBats:Questions,ResearchNeeds,andHypotheses.FrontiersinEcologyandtheEnvironment5(6):315–324.
Kyle,K.,andR.Kelsey.2011.Resultsofthe2011TricoloredBlackbirdStatewideSurvey.AudubonCalifornia,Sacramento,CA.Available:http://tricolor.ice.ucdavis.edu/downloads.
Loredo,I.,D.VanVuren,andM.L.Morrison.1996.HabitatUseandMigrationBehavioroftheCaliforniaTigerSalamander.JournalofHerpetology30(2):282–285.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐166
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Maclaren,P.A.,D.E.Runde,andS.Anderson.1984.ARecordofTree‐NestingPrairieFalconsinWyoming.Condor86:487–488.
MacWhirter,R.B.,andK.L.Bildstein.1996.NorthernHarrier(Circuscyaneus).InA.PooleandF.Gill,(eds.).TheBirdsofNorthAmerica,No.210.Philadelphia,PA:TheAcademyofNaturalSciencesandWashington,DC:TheAmericanOrnithologists’Union.
Marti,C.D.,A.F.Poole,andL.R.Bevier.2005.BarnOwl(Tytoalba).InA.PooleandF.Gill(eds.),TheBirdsofNorthAmericaIthaca:CornellLabofOrnithology.RetrievedfromtheBirdsofNorthAmericaOnline.Available:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/001.Accessed:May19,2014.
Meese,R.J.2014.Resultsofthe2014TricoloredBlackbirdStatewideSurvey.July31.Davis,CA:UniversityofCalifornia,Davis,DepartmentofEnvironmentalScienceandPolicy.
Mazurek,M.J.2004.AMaternityRoostofTownsend’sBig‐EaredBats(Corynorhinustownsendii)inCoastRedwoodBasalHollowsinNorthwesternCalifornia.NorthwesternNaturalist85:60–62.
NationalAudubonSociety.2011.TheChristmasBirdCountHistoricalResults[Online].Available:http://www.christmasbirdcount.org.AccessedDecember12,2012.
NatureServe.2012.NatureServeExplorer:AnOnlineEncyclopediaofLife[webapplication].Version7.1.NatureServe,Arlington,VA.Available:http://www.natureserve.org/explorer.Accessed:May19,2014.
Nelson,R.W.1974.PrairieFalcons:NestingAttemptonaBuildingandEffectofWeatheronCourtshipandIncubation.RaptorResearchFoundationEthologyInformationExchange1:10–12.Orloff,S.,andA.Flannery.1992.WindTurbineEffectsonAvianActivity,HabitatUse,andMortalityinAltamontPassandSolanoCountyWindResourceArea.ReporttoCaliforniaEnergyCommission,Sacramento,CA.SantaCruz,CA:BiosystemsAnalysis,Inc.
Orloff,S.,F.Hall,andL.Spiegel.1986.DistributionandHabitatRequirementsoftheSanJoaquinKitFoxintheNorthernExtremeofTheirRange.TransactionsoftheWesternSectionoftheWildlifeSociety22:60–70.
PandionSystems,Inc.2010.AltamontVascoRepower—AcousticBatMonitoringPreliminaryFindings.October8.AppendixCofVascoWindsRepoweringProjectFinalEnvironmentalImpactReport.StateClearinghouseNo.2010032094.April2011.Martinez,CA:ContraCostaCountyDepartmentofConservationandDevelopment.
Phipps,K.B.1979.HuntingMethods,HabitatUseandActivityPatternsofPrairieFalconsintheSnakeRiverBirdsofPreyNaturalArea,Idaho.Master'sThesis.WesternIllinoisUniversity,Macomb.
Pierson,E.D.,andW.E.Rainey.1998.Distribution,Status,andManagementofTownsend’sBig‐EaredBat(Corynorhinustownsendii)inCalifornia.May.BMCPTechnicalReportNumber96‐7.FinalReportforContractNo.FG7129.SubmittedNovember1994toWildlifeManagementDivision,BirdandMammalConservationProgram.Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
Pitcher,E.J.1977.NestSiteSelectionforPrairieFalcons.Auk94:371.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐167
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Polite,C.1990.California’sWildlife:Barnowl.CaliforniaWildlifeHabitatRelationshipsSystem,Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaInteragencyWildlifeTaskGroup,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
Polite,C.,andG.Ahlborn.1990.AmericanKestrel.Editor:S.Bailey.CaliforniaWildlifeHabitatRelationshipsSystem,CaliforniaInteragencyWildlifeTaskGroup,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.Available:http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cwhr/cawildlife.aspx.Accessed:May19,2014.
Polite,C.,andJ.Pratt.1990.California’sWildlife:Red‐TailedHawk.CaliforniaWildlifeHabitatRelationshipsSystem,Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaInteragencyWildlifeTaskGroup,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
Powell,J.A.,andC.L.Hogue.1979.CaliforniaInsects.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Preston,R.E.2000.NoteworthyCollections:California.Madroño47:138.
Preston,C.R.,andR.D.Beane.1993.Red‐TailedHawk(Buteojamaicensis).InA.PooleandF.Gill(eds.),TheBirdsofNorthAmerica.Ithaca:CornellLabofOrnithology.RetrievedfromtheBirdsofNorthAmericaOnline.Available:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/052.Accessed:May2014.
Randall,J.M.,andM.C.Hoshovsky.2000.California’sWildlandInvasivePlants.Pages11–19inC.C.Bossard,J.M.Randall,andM.C.Hoshovsky(eds.).InvasivePlantsofCalifornia’sWildlands.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Rogers,C.2001.RevisionoftheNearcticLepidurus(Notostraca).JournalofCrustaceanBiology21(4):991–1006.
Roppe,J.A.,S.M.Siegel,andS.E.Wilder.1989.PrairieFalconNestingonTransmissionTowers.Condor91:711–712.
Sauer,J.R.,J.E.Hines,andJ.Fallon.2008.TheNorthAmericanBreedingBirdSurvey,ResultsandAnalysis1966–2007.Version5.15.2008.Laurel,MD:USGSPatuxentWildlifeResearchCenter.
Sauer,J.R.,J.E.Hines,J.E.Fallon,K.L.Pardieck,D.J.Ziolkowski,Jr.,andW.A.Link.2011.TheNorthAmericanBreedingBirdSurvey,ResultsandAnalysis1966–2010.Version12.07.2011.Laurel,MD:USGSPatuxentWildlifeResearchCenter.
Sawyer,J.O.,andT.Keeler‐Wolf.1995.AManualofCaliforniaVegetation.Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaNativePlantSociety.
Sherrod,S.K.1978.DietsofNorthAmericanFalconiforms.JournalofRaptorResearch12:49–121.
Shuford,W.D.,andT.Gardali(eds.).2008.CaliforniaBirdSpeciesofSpecialConcern:ARankedAssessmentofSpecies,Subspecies,andDistinctPopulationsofBirdsofImmediateConservationConcerninCalifornia.StudiesofWesternBirdsNo.1.WesternFieldOrnithologists,Camarillo,CA,andCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame,Sacramento,CA.
Smallwood,J.A.,andD.M.Bird.2002.AmericanKestrel(Falcosparverius).InA.PooleandF.Gill(eds.),TheBirdsofNorthAmerica.Ithaca:CornellLabofOrnithology;retrievedfromtheBirdsofNorthAmericaOnline.Available:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/602.Accessed:May2014.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐168
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Smallwood,K.S.,2010.BaselineAvianandBatFatalityRatesattheTresVaquerosWindProject,ContraCostaCounty,California.ReporttotheEastBayRegionalParkDistrict.,2010.
Smallwood,K.S.,D.A.Bell,S.A.Snyder,J.E.Didonato.2010.NovelScavengerRemovalTrialsIncreaseWindTurbine–CausedAvianFatalityEstimates.JournalofWildlifeManagement74(5):1089–1097.
Smallwood,K.S.,andB.Karas.2009.AvianandBatFatalityRatesatOld‐GenerationandRepoweredWindTurbinesinCalifornia.JournalofWildlifeManagement73(7):1062–1071.
Smallwood,K.S.,andL.Neher.2010.SitingRepoweredWindTurbinestoMinimizeRaptorCollisionsattheTresVaquerosWindProject,ContraCostaCounty,California.April.Draft.PreparedfortheEastBayRegionalParkDistrict.
Smallwood,K.S.,L.Neher,andD.A.Bell.2009.Map‐BasedRepoweringandReorganizationofaWindResourceAreatoMinimizeBurrowingOwlandOtherBirdFatalities.October.Energies2:915–943.
Smallwood,K.S.,L.A.Neher,D.A.Bell,J.E.DiDonato,B.R.Karas,S.A.Snyder,andS.R.Lopez.2008.RangeManagementPracticestoReduceWindTurbineImpactsonBurrowingOwlsandOtherRaptorsintheAltamontPassWindResourceArea,California.CaliforniaEnergyCommission,PIEREnergy‐RelatedEnvironmentalResearchProgram.CEC‐500‐2008‐080.
Smallwood,K.S.,L.Neher,andJ.Mount.2011.NestingBurrowingOwlDistributionandAbundanceintheAltamontPassWindResourceArea,California.September16.P228.PreparedfortheAltamontPassWindResourceAreaScientificReviewCommittee.Available:http://www.altamontsrc.org/.Accessed:November26,2013.
Smallwood,S.,andL.Spiegel.2005a.AssessmenttoSupportanAdaptiveManagementPlanfortheAPWRA.January19.CEC‐releasedTechnicalReport.
———.2005b.PartialRe‐AssessmentofanAdaptiveManagementPlanfortheAPWRA:AccountingforTurbineSize.March25.CEC‐releasedTechnicalReport.
———.2005c.CombiningBiology‐BasedandPolicy‐BasedTiersofPriorityforDeterminingWindTurbineRelocation/ShutdowntoReduceBirdFatalities.June1.CEC‐releasedTechnicalReport.
Smallwood,K.S.,andC.G.Thelander.2004.DevelopingMethodstoReduceMortalityintheAltamontPassWindResourceArea.FinalReportbyBioResourceConsultantstotheCaliforniaEnergyCommission,PublicInterestEnergyResearch—EnvironmentalArea500‐01‐019.
Stebbins,R.C.1954.AmphibiansandReptilesofWesternNorthAmerica.NewYork,NY:McGraw‐HillBookCompany,Inc.
———.2003.WesternReptilesandAmphibians.ThirdEdition.NewYork,NY:HoughtonMifflinCompany.
Szewczak,J.M.2013.AcousticBatSurveyatVascoWinds,LLCWindArea2012.September.AttachmenttoFinal2012–2013AnnualReport,AvianandBatMonitoringProject,VascoWinds,LLC.PreparedforVentusEnvironmentalSolutions,Portland,OR.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐169
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Talley,T.S.,D.Wright,M.Holyoak.2006.Assistancewiththe5‐YearReviewoftheValleyElderberryLonghornBeetle(Desmoceruscalifornicusdimorphus).UnitedStatesFishandWildlifeService.Sacramento,CA.
U.S.FishandWildlifeService.1996.ProgrammaticFormalEndangeredSpeciesActConsultationonIssuanceof404PermitsforProjectswithRelativelySmallEffectsonListedVernalPoolCrustaceanswithintheJurisdictionoftheSacramentoFieldOffice,California.February28.1‐1‐96‐F‐1.IssuedbyEcologicalServices,SacramentoFieldOffice,Sacramento,CA.
———.1998.RecoveryPlanforUplandSpeciesoftheSanJoaquinValley,California.Region1,Portland,OR.
———.1999.ConservationGuidelinesfortheValleyElderberryLonghornBeetle.SacramentoFishandWildlifeOffice,Sacramento,CA.RevisedJuly9.
———.2002a.RecoveryPlanfortheCaliforniaRed‐LeggedFrog(Ranaauroradraytonii).Portland,OR.
———.2002b.DraftRecoveryPlanforChaparralandScrubCommunitySpeciesofSanFranciscoBay,California.November.Portland,OR.
———.2007.LonghornFairyShrimp(Branchinectalongiantenna)5‐YearReview:SummaryandEvaluation.PreparedbytheSacramentoFishandWildlifeOffice.Sacramento,CA.
———.2010.SanJoaquinKitFox(Vulpesmacrotismutica)5‐YearReview:SummaryandEvaluation.PreparedbytheSacramentoFishandWildlifeOffice.Sacramento,CA.
———.2011.U.S.FishandWildlifeServiceStandardizedRecommendationsforProtectionoftheEndangeredSanJoaquinKitFoxpriortoorduringGroundDisturbance.January.Sacramento,CA:SacramentoFishandWildlifeOffice.Available:http://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es/survey‐protocols‐guidelines/Documents/kitfox_standard_rec_2011.pdf.Accessed:December12,2013.
———.2012.U.S.FishandWildlifeServiceLand‐BasedWindEnergyGuidelines.March23.OMBControlNo1018‐0148.
———.2013a.EagleConservationPlanGuidance:Module1—Land‐BasedWindEnergy.Version2.April.DivisionofMigratoryBirdManagement.Available:http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html.Lastupdated:June27,2014.
———.2013b.ListofFederal,EndangeredandThreatenedSpeciesthatOccurinormaybeAffectedbyProjectsintheU.S.GeologicalSurvey7.5‐MinuteMidway,Altamont,CedarMountain,ByronHotSprings,CliftonCourtForebayQuadrangles.LastRevised:September18,2011.Available:www.fws.gov/sacramento/es/spp_lists/auto_list.cfm.Accessed:July1,2013.
U.S.GeologicalSurvey.2013.EstimationofSiteOccupancyandNestingSuccessofGoldenEaglesintheDiabloMountainsofCentralCalifornia.August.InformationBrief.ForestandRangelandEcosystemScienceCenter.
WesternBatWorkingGroup.2005.Townsend’sBig‐EaredBat.Speciesaccountdevelopedforthe1998RenoBiennialMeeting;updatedatthe2005PortlandBiennialMeeting.OriginalaccountbyRickSherwin;2005updatebyAntoinettePiaggio.Available:http://www.wbwg.org.Accessed:December20,2013.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐170
October 2014ICF 00323.08
———.2007.RegionalBatSpeciesPriorityMatrix.Available:http://www.wbwg.org/spp_matrix.html.
Weller,T.J.,andJ.A.Baldwin,2011.UsingEcholocationMonitoringtoModelBatOccupancyandInformMitigationsatWindEnergyFacilities.TheJournalofWildlifeManagement9999:1–13;2011;DOI:10.1002/jwmg.260.
WesternEcoSystemsTechnology,Inc.2008.DiabloWindsWildlifeMonitoringProgressReport,March2005–February2007.August.Cheyenne,WY.
Williams,D.F.1986.MammalianSpeciesofConcerninCalifornia.CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGameReport86‐1.CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame,Sacramento,CA.112pages.
Yosef,R.1996.LoggerheadShrike(Laniusludovicianus).InA.PooleandF.Gill(eds.),TheBirdsofNorthAmerica.Ithaca:CornellLabofOrnithology;RetrievedfromtheBirdsofNorthAmericaOnline.Available:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/231.Accessed:May2014.
Zacharias,E.H.2012.Atriplex.Pages630–638inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.).TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Zeiner,D.C.,W.F.Laudenslayer,Jr.,andK.E.Mayer(eds.).1988.California’sWildlife.VolumeI:AmphibiansandReptiles.CaliforniaStatewideWildlifeHabitatRelationshipsSystem.Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
———.1990a.California’sWildlife.VolumeII:Birds.CaliforniaStatewideWildlifeHabitatRelationshipsSystem.Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
———.1990b.California’sWildlife.VolumeIII:Mammals.CaliforniaStatewideWildlifeHabitatRelationshipsSystem.Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
Zweifel,R.G.1955.Ecology,Distribution,andSystematicsofFrogsoftheRanaboyleiGroup.UniversityofCaliforniaPublicationsinZoology54(4):207–292.
Personal Communications
Arnold,RichardA.,PhD.2011.Entomologist,EntomologicalConsultingServicesLtd.,PleasantHill,CA.August22and23,2011—WrittencommentsontheDraftSupplementalBiologicalAssessmentforPG&E’sValleyElderberryLonghornBeetleConservationProgram.
Barton,Chris.2014.ActingEnvironmentalProgramsManager.July21,2014—LettertoSandraRivera,AssistantPlanningDirector,AlamedaCountywithcommentsontheAPWRARepoweringDraftEIR.
Stedman,Bret.Manager,CaliforniaRaptorCenter,UCDavis.December13,2012—EmailcorrespondencewithLucasBare,ICFInternational,Englewood,CO.
Recommended