View
10
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
1
REPORTER'S RECORDTRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 2015-DCV-0235-B
THERESA GAMEZ,PLAINTIFF
V.
DILLON TRANSPORT, INC.;DILLON TRANSPORT, INC.,IN ITS COMMON OR ASSUMEDNAME;
KENNETH EUGENE JENNINGSANDMIGUEL A. GARCIA, SR.,
DEFENDANTS
)))))))))))))
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
117TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS
_________________________
TESTIMONY OFEVERETT DILLMAN
ANDMIGUEL GARCIA
(DIRECT EXAMINATION ONLY)__________________________
On the 11th day of November, 2015, the
following proceedings came on to be heard in the
above-entitled and numbered cause before the HONORABLE
SANDRA L. WATTS, Judge Presiding, held in Corpus
Christi, Nueces County, Texas:
Proceedings reported by Machine Shorthand.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
2
APPEARANCES:
MR. WILLIAM R. EDWARDS IIISBOT NO. 06465010ANGELINA BELTRANSBOT NO. 02111700The Edwards Law FirmFrost Bank Plaza802 North Carancahua Street, Suite 1400Corpus Christi, Texas 78401Telephone: 361-698-7600
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
MR. ALEJANDRO BLANCOCalifornia Bar No. 133073The Blanco Law Firm, P.C.535 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 700Glendale, California 91203Telephone: 661-948-6000
andMR. CRAIG S. SMITHSBOT NO. 18553570Law Offices of Craig S. Smith14493 SPID, Suite A, PMB 240Corpus Christi, Texas 78418Telephone: 361-728-8037
ATTORNEYS FOR CROSS PLAINTIFF, MIGUEL A. GARCIA, SR.
MR. LARRY D. WARRENSBOT NO. 20888450Naman, Howell, Smith & Lee, PLLC1001 Reunion Place, Suite 600San Antonio, Texas 78218Telephone: 210-731-6350
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT, DILLON TRANSPORT, INC.
MR. DOUGLAS CHAVESSBOT NO. 04161400MR. AIDAN PERALESSBOT NO. 24027604Chaves, Obregon & Perales, LLP802 North Carancahua, Suite 2100Corpus Christi, Texas 78401Telephone: 361-884-5400
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT KENNETH EUGENE JENNINGS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
3
P R O C E E D I N G S
(December 11, 2015)
THE COURT: All right. Before the jury
comes in, I did not receive anything from the defense
with regards to the issue of net worth. I did receive a
letter brief from Mr. Edwards and I have read that and
it dawned on me before I left -- yes, you've come to an
agreement?
MR. EDWARDS: You know, after all of this,
I woke up this morning and thought this is way too hard,
we're just gonna withdraw the subpoena and we won't
worry about evidence of net worth.
MR. SMITH: Join.
MR. WARREN: I appreciate that from both
gentlemen.
MR. EDWARDS: And I'm sorry that we put you
through the hoops.
THE COURT: No, that's all right. It
dawned on me yesterday that's why I immediately went --
I spent three days about a month ago at a seminar for
judges put on by the National Association of
Professional Accountants on three days on financial
statements. So I thought, you know, I'll bet there is
something in there and I went home and read through all
of my notes and I am -- I was prepared to grant the
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
4
issue of the net worth including the financial
statements because the basic financial statements of
which there are five, the income and expenses now called
by the way, a comprehensive income statement --
MR. EDWARDS: Yes.
THE COURT: -- instead of income profit and
loss, and it's relevant -- so you'll know this, it's
relevant for the purposes of net worth with regards to
having an idea of the operational changes or effect on
the net worth.
MR. CHAVES: Actually, we found some cases
that say the same thing.
THE COURT: I did too.
MR. WARREN: And I did send an e-mail. I
was having computer problems last night, that was the
problem, but I did send one at about three till nine
this morning and you can ignore that one now.
THE COURT: Actually, I found his about
3:30 in the morning so.
MR. WARREN: I was trying to not look at
3:30 in the morning.
THE COURT: But anyway, like I say, after
reviewing everything with three days of hardly keeping
my eyes open on financial statements, there was no
question that I think it's very relevant to the issue of
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
5
of net worth.
MR. EDWARDS: I don't disagree with that.
THE COURT: So you're withdrawing the issue
of net worth?
MR. EDWARDS: Yes. You know what, I'm not
gonna worry about mucking up the waters.
THE COURT: Okay. Very good.
MR. EDWARDS: We'll just go forward with
that.
THE COURT: You got it.
All right. Are we ready?
MR. WARREN: We're ready, Your Honor.
MR. CHAVES: Ready, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Let's bring in the jury,
Mr. Gallegos.
(Jury enters courtroom.)
THE COURT: Please be seated, everyone.
And Mr. Edwards, call your next witness.
MR. EDWARDS: Plaintiff calls Everett
Dillman.
THE COURT: I haven't sworn you.
(The witness is sworn.)
THE WITNESS: Yes, ma'am.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
6
EVERETT DILLMAN,
having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:
DIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. EDWARDS:
Q. Will you tell us your name, please, sir.
A. Everett G. Dillman.
Q. What do you do?
A. I'm a business and economic consultant. I am
president of International Business Planners
Incorporated which is a business and economic consulting
firm in El Paso.
Q. You're an economist?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Can you give us a bit of your background,
educational background and experience?
A. I have a bachelor's degree in business from the
University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, I have a
master's degree in business from the same school. I
have an additional year of graduate work at the
University of New Mexico, and finally, I have a Ph.D. or
doctorate from the University of Texas at Austin.
In terms of work experience, I've taught --
teaching experience, I've taught part-time at the
University of Albuquerque, University of New Mexico
before I went away for my doctorate. Then I went back
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
7
to the University of New Mexico where I was an assistant
professor, and one year was director of the Bureau of
Business and Economic Research. In 1967, I came to the
University of Texas at El Paso as director of the Bureau
of Business and Economic Research and as an associate
professor. I was promoted to full professor for --
about two years later, and then, I stayed with
University of Texas at El Paso until 1985 when I
retired. However, ever since the early '60s, I've
maintained a business, an economic consulting firm, on a
part-time basis while I was teaching, on a full-time
basis since I retired.
Q. When do you plan to retire?
A. One year after your father retires.
Q. You and my father go way back?
A. Yes, sir, we've been -- I've been working with
your father for probably 40, 45 years. He's one year
older than me, that's why I said that.
Q. Yeah. So when you approach a case like this --
first of all, what did we ask you to do in this case?
A. You asked me to make an evaluation of what we
call the present day value of certain areas of potential
economic damage due to an injury to Ms. Gamez.
Q. So there are several different categories that
you look at?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
8
A. Yes, sir.
Q. What are the different categories that you look
at?
A. Well, the general categories are the earning
capacity which is what an individual would have had the
ability to have or make, given their background,
education, training, experience and work experience and
prior earnings. What I compute is their earning
capacity, how much of that has been taken away because
of the injury is not an economic matter, that's a
vocational matter and I don't enter into that.
The second thing I look at or what we
generally call household production or household
services. The things an individual would perform in and
around the household, things like cooking, cleaning,
maybe a little repair work, working on the yard, that
sort of thing.
And the third thing is what we call future
medical and care costs, and what I'm -- and I don't
determine what those costs are. In a case such as this
where I have what we call a life care planner, where
somebody whose expertise lies in the area of assigning
these costs presents a report. I take that report and
say, how much money do we need to today to invest that
will then be able to pay for this -- these care costs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
9
over the individual's expected life expectancy, and at
the end of that time, the original amount will be all
gone.
Q. So let's approach this one at a time, if we
may?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Before we do that, why do we even need an
economist to take a look at these numbers? You know,
for example, the life care plan, the doctor gave us what
he determined to be the cost of her life care plan in
the future. Why do we need somebody like you to come in
and do what you do with these numbers?
A. Well, there are different categories in a life
care plan. And when I said that you have to know how
much money taken today that you need, you have to
consider the fact that something that cost a dollar
today 20 years from now is gonna cost more than a dollar
because of inflation. So I have to make those
considerations where the -- where the life care planner
does. The life care planner says, this is what it costs
today.
Q. Excuse me --
A. Also, there's another element --
Q. Excuse me. If I may real quick, let me
interrupt. So if we talk about today and you said if
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
10
something costs one dollar today, sometime in the
future --
A. It's gonna cost more than a dollar.
Q. We have a historical trend of inflation?
A. Yes.
Q. So due to inflation, the cost is going to be
greater than one dollar?
A. It's going to be more than one dollar.
Q. More than one dollar. All right. So what else
do you have to take into account in order to -- if we
looked at just inflation and the doctor said, it's gonna
take $100 in the future for medical care, what do you
have to do to account for inflation now so that that
$100 is fully available in the future?
A. Well, first thing I have to do is say, if it's
gonna cost $100 today, I say, for what. I mean, what is
it for? Is it for a doctor, or is it for medicine, or
is it for somebody to help around the house?
Q. So let me, if I may, let's just talk generally
first and then we'll break it down.
A. Okay.
Q. All right.
A. But what I'm saying is the first thing I have
to do is determine what the costs are.
Q. And do you have to -- and you got this in the
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
11
life care plan?
A. Yes.
Q. And then you have to account for inflation?
A. Yes.
Q. Which means you have to increase it. We need
more money today because of inflation in the future?
A. Yes. Well, you would need more money today if
it wasn't for the fact that you can invest that money.
Q. And that's the next line, isn't it?
A. Yeah.
Q. All right. So in terms of the fund, the fund
to pay for it, if we just look at -- if we're gonna have
a one dollar -- if we're gonna have a one dollar cost
out in the future, and there is a fund today that's
gonna earn interest, that's essentially what you're
saying, right?
A. That's correct.
Q. We need less than a dollar today --
A. That's correct.
Q. -- because we can invest it in the fund and it
will be a dollar in the future?
A. That's correct.
Q. But the dollar cost today is gonna be more than
a dollar in the future?
A. That's correct.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
12
Q. So what do you do with inflation and interest?
A. What you have to do is you have to say, which
is the biggest force. Is the inflation greater than the
interest or is the interest greater than the inflation,
and there is -- there are mathematical techniques of
doing this. We do a ratio analyses, and on some cases
of that life care plan, some of the elements, the
medical service part, the doctors and hospitals, the
nurses and that sort of thing, those costs have been
going up faster than the interest rate, so you actually
have a slight compounding effect. For other things like
medicines, the long-term trend of those is less than the
interest rate. Currently, it's going up faster, but the
long-term trend is less than the interest rate so you
don't need quite as much money today to make these
payments over the future time. So what I started to say
what I have to do is break these the life care plan down
into these categories and determine which category, what
the inflation is for a particular category, and then,
offset that against the interest rate. And then I just
apply that to what the life care planner did. I make
absolutely no judgment as to whether the items are
needed or not needed. That is not my field.
Q. All right. Now, these figures that you used,
this information that you use about inflation trends on
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
13
the various categories and the earning ability of money
trends, where do you come up with those numbers, is that
public standard in your industry?
A. No. Well, different economists use different
techniques. It's the same general methodology, but they
come up with slightly different conclusions as to what
the appropriate interest rate or rate of inflation. I
tend to use a long-term relationship between 1970 and
the latest data. All this data comes from various
departments of the federal government. The reason I use
a long-term trend is because the ups and downs of the
economy kind of cancel out. For instance, in some of
the period of this 40-year period, interest rates have
been really high, very high. Now they're very low. But
inflation in those periods were very high, and now it's
very low. The two sources tend to go together.
Q. Now, when we talk -- if we shift for a moment
to talking about -- about earning capacity and the
present value of earning capacity, do you go through the
same kind of analysis there?
A. We go through the same kind of analysis, except
that the category that I used are wages in the economy,
and in this case, wages have increased less than the
interest rate over this period of time so you need a
little bit less money today to make up. If you would
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
14
just multiply, let's say that one dollar was for 20
years, that would be $20. We wouldn't need to have $20
today. You could have let's say $18 today and that --
and 20 years would equal $20.
Q. Okay. With respect to earning capacity, this
has more to do with costs, right?
A. Yes.
Q. So if we talk about earning capacity, you're
essentially talking about a stream of income?
A. Yes.
Q. And as you put it, if we have one dollar per
year with over 20 years, you have a stream of income,
and in 20 years you would have earned $20?
A. Well, you would have earned more than $20
because it would be inflation.
Q. In the absence of inflation?
A. Yes. In the absence of inflation you would
have earned $20.
Q. All right. And so, in the absence of inflation
and interest rates, to replace this stream of income,
you'd need to start with the fund of $20?
A. That is correct, sir.
Q. Because then, from the fund you could pull a
dollar a year for 20 years and have your $20?
A. Yes.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
15
Q. And what I heard you just say was wage
increases are not keeping up -- I'm sorry, the interest
is ahead of wage increases?
A. Yes.
Q. So you actually need a little less than $20?
A. Yes.
Q. Because the fund is put, in essence, into an
account, it earns interest as it's being paid out?
A. That's correct.
Q. And at the end of the -- as you say, you start
with $18 hypothetically?
A. Yes.
Q. And with the interest that's earned, this will
pay out a dollar per year for 20 years and you still end
up paying out essentially $20?
A. You -- the current purchasing power equivalent
of $20, yes.
Q. Yeah. But you have to -- you have to still
take into account both earning capacity and money?
A. Yes.
Q. And inflation?
A. Yes.
(The following bench conference was held.)
MR. EDWARDS: I was going to offer this
summary.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
16
MR. CHAVES: We have objections on two
grounds, Your Honor. There's no objection -- that is,
his testimony gave no objections of having any evidence
of household services, loss of household services. He
said he had no information on it, no basis for --
THE COURT: Was it in the --
MR. WARREN: In the report?
MR. CHAVES: It's in his deposition.
MR. EDWARDS: This is from -- this is from
his report, and he's not saying there is loss of
household services, he's saying, if there is, this is
how you can value it.
MR. WARREN: Well, on top of that, Your
Honor, I object, I don't believe an economist in their
case can walk in and testify to the fact of loss of
household services.
MR. CHAVES: And the third basis is expert
reports --
THE COURT: I guess I have a question for
you. In the life report who did -- I can't think of her
name.
MR. WARREN: Dr. Ramon.
THE COURT: Okay. Did he list any
household services?
MR. EDWARDS: Hang on just a minute.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
17
THE COURT: I don't think that he did.
MR. CHAVES: He didn't.
THE COURT: And then --
MR. EDWARDS: No, and if --
THE COURT: Then what's the purpose of this
if we don't have any basis for it?
MR. EDWARDS: If Theresa Gamez testifies, I
can't do these types of chores around the house anymore,
what he says is he puts a dollar value of $7.50 per hour
and he says 10 hours - 10 hours a week at $7.50 an hour,
this is the present value for her.
MR. CHAVES: And my objection is threefold.
Number one, he has no expertise to give that
information; number two --
THE COURT: Why wouldn't he?
MR. CHAVES: Number two, he's indicated
that he has no evidence of household services. But the
third one is extra reports --
THE COURT: I'm going to allow him to
testify, but I'm not going to admit it until I have an
underlying foundation for it.
MR. CHAVES: I agree.
THE COURT: Okay.
MR. CHAVES: Oh.
THE COURT: I'm so glad you --
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
18
MR. CHAVES: Yeah, yeah, I know.
THE COURT: -- like my ruling.
MR. WARREN: For now, the objections are
overruled?
THE COURT: It's -- it's overruled, but I'm
not going to admit it for the purposes of the evidence.
MR. CHAVES: And it's all --
THE COURT: It' kind of a conditional.
MR. CHAVES: Yeah.
(End of bench conference.)
Q. (BY MR. EDWARDS) So, Dr. Dillman, let's
approach the medical expenses first. We're talking the
present earning capacity, correct?
A. Not of future medical.
Q. I said medical expenses?
A. Yes.
Q. All right. So you had -- what did you do to
calculate or to get to a number for present value of
medical expenses?
A. First thing I did was break the medical
expenses into four different categories. Medical
services which are doctors, hospitals, nurses, services
performed by home health agencies, that sort of thing.
The next is medical commodities which are prescription
drugs, nonprescription drugs. It would be things like
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
19
crutches, scooters, wheelchairs and so on. Then
nonmedical services which would be things like
wheelchair repair, and in some cases there would be
people that helped around the house that don't come from
a home health agency. I want to say a little bit more
about that later. And the fourth thing are nonmedical
commodities. Nonmedical commodities are things that are
necessitated by the injury but are not medical in
nature. For instance, a burn victim might utilize a
petroleum jelly to put on like -- like Vaseline to put
on a scar tissue to keep it pliable. That would not be
a medical commodity, but those are usually very, very
little, if any.
Q. All right. And you aren't -- you aren't making
the determination yourself in your hypothetical that a
burn victim needs petroleum jelly, that would be
something you'd find with a life care planner?
A. The life care planner would do that. I would
not introduce anything of my own into the life care
plan, other than to compute how much money taken today
would be needed to -- to accommodate that plan.
Q. All right. So you have looked at Dr. -- in
this instance -- and by the way, when you're talking
about wheelchairs, you're talking about that as an
example of what you look at?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
20
A. Oh, that's an example. I'm not trying to make
a determination that in this case a wheelchair is
needed.
Q. Right. You were just using that as an example
of a commodity?
A. Of a commodity, yes.
Q. All right. So if you take Dr. Ramon's life
care plan that you determined, what would need to be
funded today to fully pay for his life care plan over --
over the life of the life care plan?
A. Yes, sir, I did.
Q. And what was that number?
A. $3,182,385.
MR. EDWARDS: May I have the ELMO, please.
Q. (BY MR. EDWARDS) Now, if we look at present
value of earning capacity, what did you do to determine,
first, Ms. Gamez's earning capacity?
A. Well, what I had to do was to make a
determination of two things other than the -- what I
talked about inflation, and two other things other than
inflation and discount. I had to determine over what
length of time would she have the ability -- she would
have had or still may have the ability to earn money.
And for that, I used two different numbers, I used one
number that comes from a table that's prepared from data
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
21
published by the federal government, and this is what we
call work life expectancy. That table includes the
probability of premature death, illness, accident or
retirement. But since the table includes retirement,
and retirement really doesn't reduce your capacity or
ability, and what I'm trying to compute is the ability
or capacity. I make another calculation to age 70. I
use age 70 as the top working age even though, mainly
because you have to take out your retirement programs by
70 and a half, otherwise, you pay a huge penalty for it.
So I make two determinations up for a length of time.
Now, the second thing I have to do -- and
this is very important -- I have to say what number,
what number am I going to use to start the mathematics,
the arithmetic, and for what -- for this, I have to look
at what the individual has done, what they have shown
the ability or capacity to do. In this case, I had
income tax information for quite a number of years, and
so what I picked was the last year of income, which was
2014, and I said, we know that she had or even at the
current time had the ability to earn this amount of
money, so that was the amount that I started with. Then
I took it over this length of period of time, I took out
income tax, which I have to do, and I added in the
normal average fringe benefits like insurance, and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
22
employer contribution to retirement programs and to
social Security, and then I come up with a net number
which is called the net present value.
Q. All right.
A. Actually, two numbers.
Q. So if we -- you listed her income tax reported
earnings in your report, right?
A. Yes.
Q. And I'm showing you that now?
A. Yes.
Q. And you -- why do you use the year 2014?
A. Well, when I looked at it was the 2014, is it
consistent. Well, it is. Even though it occurred after
the accident, it is -- we know that she had that ability
or capacity. Now, whether that ability or capacity
would have been higher had the accident -- her injury
not have occurred, I don't know, and I'm not making any
determination of it. But we know she had that, at least
that amount, so that becomes a pretty stable defensible
base.
Q. All right. And so what did you determine? You
calculated two numbers for present day earning capacity,
correct?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. The first one is the work life?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
23
A. Work life which would be an additional -- from
the date of my report which was about a month ago. That
would be an additional 13 years. That number is
$937,768.
Q. That's to which age?
A. That would be -- let me see -- 64, at age 64.
Q. All right. Now, if you calculate it on - the
alternative that you calculated was to age 70?
A. Yes. That is $1,343,880.
Q. And that's taking into account the ability of a
person in today's world that would work beyond age 64 to
age 70?
A. Yes.
Q. Now, you told us that you don't actually
determine if a person has any actual loss of earning
capacity?
A. That's correct. That's a vocational matter.
Q. All right. If -- if the jury comes to the
conclusion that there is a 100 percent loss of earning
capacity -- and let me back up before I ask that. You
know that Ms. Gamez is still working and making money?
A. Yes, sir, in fact, she's earned more after the
accident --
Q. Right.
A. -- than she did before.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
24
Q. So how do you distinguish the actual wages
earned from earning capacity?
A. Well, the actual wages earned we know what
those are from the income tax. Earning capacity is what
the individual would have the ability to have earned in
-- in a case like this had the injury not occurred.
Well, the ability to earn had the injury not occurred
might be exactly the same, which means you have no loss.
The ability to earn may be -- may be lost in the future.
It may have existed in the past, but it may be lost in
the future because of the inability to perform the job
or something else, but that's a vocational matter. I
can't address that.
Q. So, for example, if -- if -- if a injured
person has an employer who, due to longevity with the
company, makes special accommodations for the injured
person and still pays them her wages, does that mean
that the person necessarily did not sustain loss of
earning capacity?
A. No. As a matter of fact, what we're talking
about normally in earning capacity is what a person
would be able to earn in a competitive labor market.
And it -- the individual may not have lost -- may not
have lost any earnings as such, but you have to consider
whether that benevolence will continue, whether the
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
25
benevolence will continue at the same level. There's a
lot of things that can occur including the interactions
with other employees. In other words, if an individual
-- and I'm not making any judgments here whether this is
the case. But if an individual is not, "pulling their
own weight," but still is getting a salary that is
competitive with the other people in the organization, I
think you know that petty jealousies can occur which
causes friction in the organization. The employer may
be willing to tolerate that friction or may not be able
to tolerate that friction. I can't make any
determination. Normally, it would tend to exist, but
again, that's not a -- that is not a matter for me to
determine.
Q. So if we wish to consider earning capacity,
should -- you were talking about a hypothetical person
who is in an environment with a benevolent employer, an
employer who is willing to make special accommodations.
If for some reason that employee, that injured person is
no longer employed by the benevolent employer, whether
it be the business goes out of business, the employer
retires, or because of the friction you were talking
about, there has to be a termination. Does earning
capacity reflect the ability of that injured person to
compete in the marketplace to get a new job and keep it?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
26
A. That's exactly what it is. In other words, the
question is how would that person be able to react in
the competitive labor market.
Q. All right. So if the jury were to determine
that there is a 100 percent loss of earning capacity,
loss of ability to compete, to get and keep employment
outside of the benevolent employer, would the jury
determine one of these numbers, either going to age 64
or age 70 for a 100 percent of loss of earning capacity?
A. I can't tell the jury what to do, but in my
opinion, that would be the loss, yes.
Q. All right. Now, if the jury were to determine
that there is say a two two-thirds loss of earning
capacity, the ability to go out in the competitive
market and compete, what would be a proper measure of
loss of earning capacity in that scenario in your
opinion?
A. 66 percent of this.
Q. So two-thirds of whichever one of these?
A. That's correct.
Q. Okay. Dr. Dillman, I think earlier you also
mentioned loss of household services?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Did you come up with a factor of the loss of
household services?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
27
A. I came up with a number that might assist the
jury in discounting the procedure. I do not know how
many hours per week on the average that would have been
lost that may not be covered in the life care plan.
That's what I said, we don't need any duplication, but -
so I said that if the jury should find that there are
approximate -- there are 10 hours per week average loss
over the rest of her lifetime, that they're not covered
in the life care plan, then -- and we value each of
those hours at federal minimum wage, $7.25 per hour, it
would discount to a certain amount. But again, that's
just a factor. If the jury should find that it's zero
hours, then it's zero. If they find that it's five
hours a week loss on the average, it would be half of
the factor. If they feel that it's 30 hours a week lost
on the average, it would be three times the factor.
This is an aid in discounting, that's all.
Q. All right. And just like on the medical
expense, you can't say that there isn't, in fact, a
medical expense incurred in the future. You have to
rely upon -- or the jury will need to rely upon other
testimony and evidence to determine that?
A. Well, they'll have -- I can't tell the jury
what to rely upon, but I will tell them not to rely upon
me.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
28
Q. You don't -- you bring it to present value?
A. Yeah, that's all I do.
Q. All right. And so this factor, this present
value factor is if there is a showing that there's a
loss of household services, this is a factor that the
jury might consider?
A. Yes.
Q. And this is a present value of that?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And you said your -- the factor is for ten
hours?
A. Average of ten hours per week.
Q. Ten hours?
A. Per week.
Q. At $7.50 an hour?
A. $7.25.
Q. $7.25. The present value of that factor?
A. $119,193.
Q. All right. Thank you. So if there were, in
fact, ten hours per week lost over the lifetime of
Theresa Gamez, and the number that would be an
appropriate, in your opinion, would be this 119,193?
A. Yes.
Q. If it's five hours per week, it's half of that?
A. Yes.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
29
Q. If it's 20 hours per week, it's twice this?
A. That's correct.
Q. Dr. Dillman, this chart that you and I have
created here, does that reflect a summary of the report
that you've done in this case and the opinions that
you've come to?
A. Yes, sir, it does.
MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, I've marked this
chart as Plaintiff's Trial Exhibit 552 and I would offer
it.
THE COURT: Any objection?
MR. CHAVES: No objection.
THE COURT: Admitted.
MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, we pass the
witness.
MR. BLANCO: If I may, Your Honor, just
briefly?
THE COURT: Yes.
DIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. BLANCO:
Q. Dr. Dillman, you talked about the forces of
inflation and the forces of interest rates --
A. Yes.
Q. -- how they compete? And you specifically
mentioned the medical inflation forces have outpaced,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
30
are stronger than the forces of interest rates?
A. Not all of the medical. Medical services,
that's doctors, hospitals, that sort of thing, nursing
homes.
Q. And here's my question. Has that been a
historical fact recognized in economics?
A. It is obviously a historical fact, the numbers
show it, I'd say recognized anybody that looks at it --
Q. Okay.
A. -- can determine what has happened in the past.
There may be some questions that by different economists
that's what's gonna happen in the future.
Q. In terms of specific analysis in your field of
expertise, is forensic economics or economics considered
a science?
A. It's a social science.
Q. And do you use scientific methodology in order
to arrive at the numbers that you have arrived here?
A. We use -- it depends on what you mean by
"scientific." It's a social science. We -- we can't
hold experiments like you can do in the natural
sciences. There's variability. What we actually do is
that we're talking about what's gonna happen in the
future.
Q. Right.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
31
A. But the future is what we would call happens
under conditions of uncertainty. But because things are
uncertain, that doesn't mean that they happen
haphazardly. Some things are more likely to happen than
others, and we call those likelihoods, probabilities.
Q. Okay.
A. And what we do in economics is utilize these
probabilities to try to reduce the problem in the future
of forecasting. We try to make things less uncertain.
Q. Are these numbers that you've discussed with
Mr. Edwards to a reasonable degree of economic
probability?
A. Yes.
MR. BLANCO: Thank you. Pass the witness.
MR. CHAVES: May I proceed, Your Honor?
THE COURT: You may.
CROSS-EXAMINATION
BY MR. CHAVES:
Q. Dr. Dillman, I don't believe you and I have
ever met before, have we?
A. I don't believe so, sir.
Q. I've seen your name for about 25 years and read
a number of your reports, but personally, you and I have
never met, or I've never even taken your deposition,
have I?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
32
A. Not that I know of.
Q. Okay. As I understand, your purpose here today
is to look at the economic numbers and come to a
conclusion so that you can give opinions on past
earnings and future earnings capacity and the medical
bills and the life care planner we've talked about?
A. Not medical bills, medical life care plan.
Q. Yes, thank you. And I think you've been candid
enough with the Court that you're not here to express
any opinions as to whether or not Theresa Gamez -- and
that's the only one that you've evaluated; is that
correct?
A. That's correct.
Q. You didn't evaluate Mr. Garcia?
A. No.
Q. Okay. You're not here to offer any opinions as
to whether or not Ms. Gamez has suffered any loss of
earnings? Is that true?
A. That is correct.
Q. And you're not here to offer any opinions that
this jury can base their judgment on, on whether or not
Ms. Gamez has suffered any loss of earning capacity; is
that true?
A. That is correct, sir.
Q. All right. What you did was simply take her
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
33
earning history, take her last year and adjusted it for
inflation, true?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. But then you likewise adjusted, you discounted
for present value?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. All right. And the reason for that is because
-- and a lifetime earnings, you earn your salary this
year, and then next year, next year, on down through
your work life expectancy, correct?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And the U.S. Tables tells us that the work life
expectancy for Ms. Gamez is 65 years of age, true?
A. No, I think it's through 64, yes.
Q. Okay.
A. Through 65, yes, that's right.
Q. Is it 64 or 65?
A. Through 64 to 65.
Q. Through 64 then. And you take that -- in the
ordinary course of life, those earnings are earned on a
year by year basis, true?
A. That's correct.
Q. But if a jury is being asked to put a figure in
there, she gets all of that at once?
A. Yes.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
34
Q. True?
A. That's correct.
Q. And because of the economic factors, she could
take then a total figure, put it in the bank and begin
to earn interest, which she wouldn't be able to do if
she was earning it year to year?
A. That's correct, sir.
Q. And that's one of the reasons that you discount
it for present value?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. All right. Now --
MR. CHAVES: May I approach, Your Honor?
THE COURT: You may.
Q. (BY MR. CHAVES) I didn't get a chance to really
look at your -- okay. Because Mr. Edwards marked the
exhibit, I can't specifically talk about --
A. Yes.
Q. -- or mark this one up. But we got present
value of earning capacity, okay?
A. Yes.
Q. Well, first of all, I noticed there's no -- in
your initial report, you made a comment that she
sustained a $64,000 lost earnings minus what she would
have earned or what she did earn?
A. That's correct.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
35
Q. All right.
A. That was -- that was for past.
Q. Right.
A. Yes.
Q. But you found out and you had to amend your
report because, in fact, she had suffered zero loss of
earnings?
A. Well, I'm not sure that's true. I -- I brought
the report up to date to the expected time of trial.
Q. Okay.
A. I didn't include anything for the past because
I understood that she was still working.
Q. True.
A. Now, whether she would have been able to have
made more had she not been injured, I don't know and I
can't say.
Q. But from an economist point of view, you could
not give any opinion that she sustained any loss of
earnings, past earnings?
A. That's correct, that's why I haven't testified
to any.
Q. So as far as past earnings, the answer is zero?
A. No. The answer is I can't say what it -- what
amount, if any.
Q. Okay. So no opinion?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
36
A. There's no opinion, that's correct.
Q. On the future -- I think it's present value
future earnings -- and this is present value of earning
capacity, true?
A. Yes.
Q. But if the jury -- the jury is never asked that
question as far as you know, are they?
A. What question?
Q. Whether she sustained -- what her future
earning capacity is?
A. No, they're asked what the loss of the future
earning capacity is.
Q. Exactly. But if the question is, what is her
future loss of earning capacity, you could not give us
an opinion on it?
A. No, that's a vocational matter.
Q. All right. In other words, you're not
suggesting to the jury that if there's asked a question
about future loss of earning capacity, that the jurors
should award 937?
A. No, I am not, I am not.
Q. Because if she continues to work, as she is
doing, the answer would be zero?
A. If she had suffered no loss of earning
capacity, obviously, the answer is still zero. If she
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
37
continues to work with the same employer, that does not
necessarily mean that she is making the same raises or
getting the same money she would have received had the
injury not occurred, but I can't address that question
at all.
Q. And that's my point. You're not here today to
express any opinion that she has sustained any future
loss of earning capacity?
A. That is correct.
Q. All right. Because whether she has benevolent
employer today through the retirement of her work life,
or whether she goes to another employer and earns more
money, she would not sustain any loss of earning
capacity?
A. Well --
Q. That is a --
A. -- if she's not hurt, she's not hurt.
Q. Whether she's hurt or not, you know there's
people who have been hurt and still they do not sustain
any loss of earning capacity, do they not?
A. Well, that's not necessarily true. There are
people who have been hurt that may not have suffered any
loss of earnings, but they can still sustain a
significant loss of earning capacity. When a person is
hurt or injured to where part of their human capital --
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
38
we're not talking economic terms.
Q. Sure.
A. Part of their human capital has been removed.
That human capital is like an investment that you could
make, and if that's been taken away, that's a loss.
Q. But --
A. Now, how much of a loss may be very difficult
or even impossible to -- to determine, but it's still a
loss.
Q. But as an economist, as a witness that you're
here for today, you could not express any opinion as to
whether earning capacity would diminish or increase?
A. Well, it couldn't have been increased, so I
don't know that --
Q. She makes more money.
A. Well, I don't see conceivably how an injury can
increase your earning capacity. Your earnings might
increase --
Q. Your earnings might?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. Fair enough, fair enough. It doesn't
mean her earnings will be diminished or increased, does
it?
A. I cannot -- well, it doesn't mean that. I
can't say. I am not making a vocational opinion, or I'm
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
39
not giving a vocational opinion.
Q. I understand. And so if she continues to work
till age 64, she has not suffered any loss of earning
capacity from a monetary figure that you can express as
an economist; is that true?
A. That she would not have suffered a diminishment
of earning capacity that I, as an economist, could
calculate.
Q. Thank you, sir. Now, the household services?
A. Yes.
Q. You put a figure of $119,000?
A. Yes.
Q. In your review of the records provided to you,
was there any indication of household services?
A. I didn't see any, but that's why I just did a
factor. I'm not saying that there has been any loss.
I'm just saying if the jury wishes to discount, this is
the way to do it.
Q. But if the jury is basing it on the evidence of
loss of household services, did you see any evidence of
loss of household services?
A. I didn't, no.
Q. No?
A. No. I don't agree with that.
Q. Okay.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
40
A. Just put, I did not see any evidence.
Q. Dillman?
A. Yeah, not that there is none. I just did not
see any.
Q. All right. Dillman saw no evidence of
household services?
A. That's correct.
Q. All right.
A. Because I didn't look.
Q. Okay. If you didn't look I guess we can move
on, sir.
One final question. You indicated that you
put an increased value on the medical services of the
life care plan?
A. Yes.
Q. In Theresa Gamez's case, if my memory is
correct, out of all the medical, future medical life
care planned for, I think 1.9 million of it was for
assisted living care?
A. I believe so, a large number, yes.
Q. Okay. Did you use the same increased rate
factor on a person who comes to her home, assisted
living, as you do -- as you did with hospitals and
doctors?
A. Yes, it falls under medical services component
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
41
on the consumer price index.
Q. So you did not consider that as a separate
category?
A. No.
MR. CHAVES: All right. Thank you.
THE WITNESS: Thank you, sir.
MR. CHAVES: I pass the witness, Your
Honor.
THE COURT: Mr. Warren.
MR. WARREN: Thank you, Your Honor.
CROSS-EXAMINATION
BY MR. WARREN:
Q. Dr. Dillman, I've got a couple of questions for
you. I understand that you did two reports, one in, or
tables let's call it. One that was done in October 7th,
2015 for purposes of this trial, right?
A. Yes.
Q. And you had earlier done one back on February
23rd, 2014?
A. Yes.
Q. And in both cases, you were trying to estimate
the future earning capacity for Ms. Gamez, correct?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Okay. And you also in your report had listed
the earnings for Ms. Gamez and, first of all, did her
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
42
earnings in 2013 exceed the earnings that she had in
2012?
A. Yes.
Q. And did her earnings in 2014 exceed the
earnings that she had in 2015 -- excuse me. In 2014, do
they exceed the earnings that she had in 2013?
A. Yes, sir, I think -- I thought I said that in
direct exam.
Q. And did you look at her earnings records
through the year 2015 to date at all?
A. No.
MR. WARREN: All right. May I approach the
witness, Your Honor?
THE COURT: You may.
Q. (BY MR. WARREN) I will show you, sir, the
employment records for 2015 --
A. Yes.
Q. -- from Allstate her employer?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And I'll flip you to the records here. It
doesn't have the year end because we're not the end of
the year of 2015?
A. Not yet.
Q. Okay. But what it does is it gives the --
looks like bimonthly, every two week pay as we progress
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
43
through the payroll ledger, correct?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. All right. Let's flip to the last page there,
I've tabbed it with a yellow marker. And this -- for
the record, page 7 -- the last page is dated through
October 6th; is that right?
A. October 6th, 2015, yes, sir.
Q. Which would include through the end of
September, I would assume?
A. Probably, yes.
Q. So that --
A. That would be three-quarters of the year.
Q. Three-quarters of the year. And what does it
indicate is her total earnings through three-quarters of
the year for 2015?
A. $52,639.87.
Q. All right. And so to figure out if we want to
extrapolate that for a complete year you would divide
that number by three, right, approximately?
A. To go to fourth, yes.
Q. Yes.
A. Or you could divide it -- you can divide this
whole number by .75.
Q. All right. Depending on how you do your math,
and if you do that, that would turn out to have an
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
44
earnings roughly of just over $70,000 for this year?
A. Probably, yes.
Q. It sounds about, approximately right?
A. It sounds right if you assume that the last
quarter of is at the same rate as the first three
quarters.
Q. Sure. But there's having earned --
A. You can extrapolate it that way, yes.
Q. It's a fair way to look at it?
A. It is.
Q. Okay.
A. It is a fair way to look at it.
Q. And if she does continue to earn the last three
-- the last three months of the year the way she did
first three months -- the first nine months of the year,
then would she have earned more in 2015 than she did in
2014?
A. Yes.
Q. All right. And in looking at your calculations
then, first of all, when you look at that February 23rd,
2014, would you agree then that her -- well, what you
add to that earnings -- actual earnings you add all the
fringe benefits that you did in your chart; is that
correct?
A. That's correct.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
45
Q. And so when you're talking about earning
capacity total, that's the income plus the fringe
benefits?
A. Yes.
Q. And would you agree then that for the year 2013
that was what she actually earned and plus benefits
exceeded what you had listed for an earning capacity?
A. Yes.
Q. And would you agree with us for the year 2014,
what she actually earned plus benefits exceeded what you
had calculated for her earning capacity?
A. No. What -- I'm sorry. What -- she earned
more in 2013 than she did in 2012. She earned more in
2014 than she did in 2013.
Q. Correct.
A. If you continue at the rate that you have said,
she would have earned more in 2015 than she did in 2014.
Q. And in -- maybe I mis-phrased what I was
intending to say. So, in any event, if she continues
earning at the rate that she's earning in 2015, will she
then when you take income plus benefits, exceed what you
would had expected for her earning capacity?
A. If you're asking me if I were to use the
extrapolated 2015, my numbers would have been higher,
yes.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
46
Q. Okay. And so as far as your calculations and
records are concerned, for the last two and a half years
since this accident, she has met or exceeded what you
had calculated or estimated would be her earning
capacity, hasn't she?
A. I haven't done the past, but, I -- since the
base would have increased, the numbers would have
increased, that is correct.
Q. Sure. But the bottom line is, she's earning
more than she was before and has exceeded, so far, every
earning capacity forecast that you've put on your
February 23rd, 2014 --
A. Oh, of course.
Q. Okay.
A. Of course.
Q. And had this case gone to trial back in
February of 2014, we have another two years almost since
that date, and during that period of time, she has
exceeded what you had listed as her earning capacity
when you did your first report in February of 2014,
hasn't she?
A. Well, not necessarily, because you'll notice
that these are kept constant because I allow no increase
in the earnings, because what I do is offset the
interest in the increase. So the amount in current
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
47
dollars stays the same. But if you're asking if you
would have normally done it and tried to do some sort of
a normal increase, yeah, that's probably be increased.
And if I were to do it again based on the annualized
2015, my numbers would be even higher.
Q. But she's meeting or exceeding your estimated
earning capacity for each of the past three years, isn't
she?
A. No. You can't do that. She's -- she has
suffered no loss of earning capacity that I can
determine for the past. That's all those numbers say.
Q. Right, but there was --
A. That's all they say.
Q. There was a two-year period where you estimated
what you thought would be her earning capacity, and now
we've past that two-year period and we can look back and
see that she passed what you had estimated?
A. No, what I did in the past is this would be the
absolute minimum of what her earning capacity would have
been, but there would have been normal increases. Those
normal increases haven't been included in the
calculations because the methodology could cause the
below market interest rate and you don't allow for
inflation, you only offset by the difference.
Q. In any event, Dr. Dillman, you agree that you
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
48
can -- can you not state that she's had any lost past
earnings?
A. Oh, I can't say that, no. That's a vocational
matter.
Q. And you can't say that over the next two or
three years if she continues to work, as she's doing,
that she will have any lost earnings, can you?
A. I cannot say that, no, that's a vocational
matter, sir.
MR. WARREN: Pass the witness.
THE COURT: Any redirect?
MR. EDWARDS: Yes.
REDIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. EDWARDS:
Q. Dr. Dillman, you've got personnel experience in
your background, correct?
A. Yes, sir, I was a personnel director for the
City of Albuquerque, chairman of the personnel board of
the County of Bernailillo in New Mexico, chairman of the
Civil Service Commission for the City of El Paso, taught
personnel at the graduate level.
Q. Are you familiar with the phrase "at will
employment"?
A. Yes.
Q. What is "at will employment"?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
49
A. It just means that a person can be terminated
essentially for cause. Usually there are some, or
sometimes, there are some legislative causes that are
not allowed, but essentially, you can fire somebody
without a big reason.
Q. You can fire -- in Texas, an employer can let
an employee go for any reason as long as it's not the
wrong reason?
A. That's correct.
Q. Are you aware of any guarantee that Laura
Harris will stay in business?
A. No.
Q. No. Are you aware of any guarantee that
Theresa Gamez will be kept at her place of employment
till age 64?
A. No, sir.
Q. You mentioned about human capital, right?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Can you explain that?
A. Human capital is what an individual has that
allows that person to earn money, would include their
education, their experience, their physical capacity,
their mental capacity. It's what a person brings to a
work place, and it is -- it is what the employer pays
for.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
50
Q. All right. So it, in essence, is the complete
person who is available in the marketplace?
A. That's correct.
Q. Now, if there's an injury that has an impact on
that human capital of a person, does that -- if there is
that kind of an injury, does that impact that person's
ability to get and keep work in the marketplace?
A. It impedes their -- it doesn't necessarily
eliminate their employability. It impedes their
competitiveness and it impedes the amount of potential
opportunities and alternatives available to the
individual.
Q. And if a person used to multitask and do three
tasks in her employment before injury, and can no longer
do that, and is down to one task --
MR. CHAVES: Excuse me, Your Honor, this is
going beyond the scope of his report and on Crawford.
THE COURT: Okay. Come on up here.
(The following bench conference is held.)
THE COURT: Again, I'm at a disadvantage
because I haven't seen his report. When you say, "goes
beyond his report," because I can't make a ruling
because I don't know that. Would you like to respond to
that?
MR. EDWARDS: This is in response to the
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
51
cross-examination talking about --
MR. CHAVES: We didn't ask him anything
about Laura Harris. We -- he's saying it's in response
to my cross exam.
THE COURT: Is it?
MR. EDWARDS: They were cross-examining on
her business -- Laura Harris' business records. Laura
Harris is the employer.
THE COURT: No, I know that.
MR. EDWARDS: And this -- I'm talking about
her employment with Laura Harris right now.
MR. CHAVES: But he's gone yeah beyond that
he's saying -- he's talking about whether someone in the
work field, at will -- at will provisions. He was not
presented as an expert in that area.
THE COURT: You're going into a little bit
of that, right? And so the bottom line is, he gets to
redirect on it --
MR. CHAVES: Okay, yeah. All right.
THE COURT: -- on that issue. Let's narrow
it down.
(End of bench conference.)
Q. (BY MR. EDWARDS) So, Dr. Dillman, if a person
has lost, has demonstrated a loss of the ability to
perform certain tasks, does that impact a person's
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
52
ability to get and keep work in the competitive
marketplace?
A. Well, obviously, it's a loss of certain part of
their human capital, which means their competitiveness
has been reduced. How much it has been reduced is a
vocational matter.
Q. And if a person used to be the top sales agent
and is no longer the top sales agent, you were shown --
remember the figures you were shown from the business
records?
A. Yes.
Q. Do you know -- is there any way to know how
much she would have earned but for this injury if she
had continued to be able to be the top salesperson?
A. No, sir.
Q. All right. The fact that she is making more
money now, if she loses her job tomorrow, your earning
capacity opinion is a good number to use, correct?
MR. CHAVES: Objection, leading.
THE COURT: Sustained.
Q. (BY MR. EDWARDS) You calculated this earning
capacity based on her 2014 earnings?
A. Yes.
Q. Of $64,000 a year?
A. I believe it was $68,862.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
53
Q. All right. If Mr. Warren is correct with his
extrapolation that it's actually $70,000, would these
numbers increase?
A. Yes.
MR. EDWARDS: Pass the witness.
THE COURT: Mr. Blanco.
REDIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. BLANCO:
Q. Dr. Dillman, this concept of human capital,
does it include anything for personal recreation, like
enjoyment of his life, or any other things that are
outside the area of work force?
A. No, sir, no, it doesn't include any
intangibles.
Q. So if the -- if the damages to a human being
also affect those lives, I mean, those part of our
lives, that's not calculated in your numbers?
A. Not at all.
MR. BLANCO: All right. Thank you.
Pass the witness.
THE COURT: Mr. Chaves.
MR. CHAVES: I have nothing further.
THE COURT: Mr. Warren.
MR. WARREN: Nothing further, Your Honor.
THE COURT: You may step down. Thank you
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
54
very much for coming.
THE WITNESS: May I be excused?
THE COURT: You may.
MR. EDWARDS: At this time plaintiff calls
Randy Collins, Jr., by video.
THE COURT: Very good.
(Deposition of Mr. Randy Collins is played
but not transcribed at this time.)
THE COURT: That concludes Mr. Collins?
MR. EDWARDS: That does conclude
Mr. Collins, and Plaintiffs would offer be Exhibit 68,
and 69 and 70.
THE COURT: Any objections?
MR. CHAVES: No objection.
MR. WARREN: What was 68?
MR. EDWARDS: 68 is a black and white, 69
and 70 stills where he --
MR. WARREN: No objection.
THE COURT: They are admitted.
Call your next witness.
MR. BLANCO: Your Honor, Cross Plaintiff
calls Mr. Mike Garcia.
(The witness is sworn.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
55
MIGUEL GARCIA,
having been first duly sworn, testified as follows:
DIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. BLANCO:
Q. Could you please state your name for the
record, Mr. Garcia?
A. Miguel A. Garcia.
Q. I told our jury when we started that you'd
rather have be called Mike; is that all right?
A. That's fine.
Q. Mr. Garcia, you've heard some parts of this
trial, you've been here sometimes?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And you have been absent other times, right?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Let's talk a little bit about, you know, going
back to school. I want to -- I want to talk about high
school. Remember?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Okay. And remember, we need words, yes, no?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. If you don't understand something I say
please tell me and I'll say it again.
A. Yes.
Q. Mr. Garcia, were you an A-student in high
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
56
school?
A. No, sir.
Q. Did you -- did you have some trouble with some
of the schooling, some of the subjects?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And Mr. Garcia, was -- were those troubles
eventually such that they prepared a special education
plan for you?
A. No, sir.
Q. Were you ever in special education that you
know of?
A. In elementary, I was.
Q. Okay. Tell us, what was it about school that
gave you trouble, if you remember?
A. The teachers. I was more like a hardworking
person, and I worked in the summertime, and I just -- I
went to the eleventh grade and I -- I got out of school
to work.
Q. What kind of work were you doing in the
eleventh grade, what were you doing?
A. I was -- I worked for a utility company
trimming trees away from power lines and I made foreman
real quick, lead foreman.
Q. And what about tree trimming did you like?
A. Yes, sir, I was very good at it. I would trim
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
57
trees away from power lines, very dangerous work, and I
was real skillful in doing that.
Q. I understand that. What about doing that work
did you like?
A. Yes, I did like it.
Q. What was it that you liked?
A. Being out -- outdoors, nice weather.
Q. And how did you learn how to do that work? Are
you taught by somebody?
A. By a few other experienced climbers, older men.
Q. And how is it that you decide to do the --
around power lines cutting? That sounds like it's
dangerous?
A. Yes, it is, sir.
Q. How come you decide to do that?
A. Because I got very good at it and they send me
to all the hot shot areas that I needed to do -- that
needed to be done. I was -- I was the lead foreman and
top climber, and I was very good at it.
Q. Did that keep you busy?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. As we heard, you didn't finish eleventh grade,
or did you finish eleventh grade?
A. I finished eleventh grade.
Q. Did you ever go for the final GED or the
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
58
diplomas?
A. No, sir, I didn't.
Q. How come?
A. I had too much work.
Q. Okay. You also were boxing those years?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And we heard quite a bit about punches and so
forth. Were you good at boxing also?
A. I won five Golden Gloves.
Q. In terms of your strategy, or the boxing
strategy, did you allow the other people to hit you,
punch after punch after punch?
A. No, sir. That's the key to boxing, you hit and
not get hit.
Q. Right. Are there things that you do in boxing
or that you -- that you did in boxing to protect your
head?
A. Headgear.
Q. In terms of your record or your fighting
record, we understand that you were an amateur for a
while?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And how many fights was that in the amateur?
A. I don't remember, I -- 17 and 3.
Q. Okay.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
59
A. That's the last I remember.
Q. We use the numbers 16 and 4. Do you think that
your record was 17 and 3?
A. Yes.
Q. Does that mean 17 -- I am actually kidding. 17
and 3 means that you won 17 and you lost 3?
A. Yes.
Q. And how old were you when you were doing this
fighting?
A. I started when I was 17.
Q. And when you turned professional, did you try a
professional bout?
A. I was like 23, 24.
Q. And by what time did you stop boxing?
A. I enjoyed the exercise, so I always done it,
but about 35.
Q. Okay.
A. Age 35.
Q. And what I'm saying is, not the exercise of it,
going out and training, but the actual fights when you
stopped?
A. Compete.
Q. Huh?
A. Talking about competing?
Q. Competing, yes.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
60
A. Yes, 35, 35.
Q. And you are how old, Mr. Garcia, when this
knockout happens? I understand you were knocked out
once?
A. Once.
Q. When -- when does that happen?
A. I was like 23.
Q. Twenty-three. And tell us about that. What
happens?
A. I got caught with a right hand.
Q. Lights out?
A. Yeah -- yes, sir.
Q. And how long does it take for you to recover,
to be back to where you were before the lights went
would go out?
A. A few minutes.
Q. Did you congratulate the guy?
A. After, yes.
Q. You had to, didn't you?
After that, were you vomiting?
A. No, sir.
Q. Did you go to the hospital?
A. No, sir.
Q. Were you dazed or did you have any thinking
problems after?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
61
A. No, sir.
Q. Did you keep on fighting?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And to your best estimate, how many fights did
you have after that, the one knockout?
A. About six more.
Q. Six more fights. So from age 23 to age 35, you
only had six fights?
A. Yeah.
Q. Now, when you sparred, do you wear gear?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And were you hit in the head hundreds and
hundreds of times when you sparred?
A. No, sir.
Q. We've seen a lot of movies, I understand, you
know, but did you do the same things, jumping rope,
punching the bags, you know, moving the -- the hands
quick?
A. Everything, yes, sir.
Q. Running?
A. Yes, sir, that was my main thing I enjoyed a
lot.
Q. While you're boxing and you're exercising, are
you able to write your own personal finances, like keep
your balance books and pay your bills and things of
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
62
that?
A. My sister helps me, but yes, I can.
Q. Not now, right now, but what I'm saying before,
before this injury?
A. Oh, yes.
Q. And while you were boxing, did you have any
problems writing --
A. No problems.
Q. -- your bills?
A. No problems, sir.
Q. Okay. Our court reporter is going to get a
little testy if we speak at the same time, that's
normal, a normal conversation, but I'm gonna ask you to
wait until I finish my question before you answer, okay?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. That also helps you understand my question.
Okay. So before this crash with the truck, but after --
while you were boxing, did you ever have any trouble
handling your own bills or figuring your own banking
accounts, or taxes? Did you ever have any problems
doing that?
A. No, sir.
Q. Are you -- let's talk about motorcycles. When
do you first start riding motorcycles?
A. I got my license the same time I got my
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
63
driver's license.
Q. Okay. And did you -- did you -- were you --
when you say you got your license, do you mean the
motorcycle license?
A. A little after I did the driving, I got my
motorcycle license.
Q. And -- about how old are you when you do get
the motorcycle driver's license?
A. Eighteen.
Q. Okay. And what type of motorcycles have you
driven since age 18?
A. I had a 650 Yamaha Special.
Q. Okay.
A. And a CB 900 Super Sport Honda.
Q. Okay.
A. And my Goldwing, three bikes.
Q. What about the Goldwing you liked?
A. Oh, I loved the Goldwing. It was -- I loved --
it was a laid back bike, going on a cruise, me and
Theresa enjoyed going on a ride. I'd drive slow, I
wouldn't drive very fast because Theresa didn't like
driving fast. Every time we'd go with a couple of
bikers, we'd stay behind, but they would wait for us
later on.
Q. Over the years, Mr. Garcia, as you drove either
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
64
the other bikes or the Goldwing, did you develop a place
in your lane that you liked to travel?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Where?
A. In the middle.
Q. In the middle of your lane?
A. Yes, sir, in the middle of my lane.
Q. Why? Why do you prefer that place?
A. Because my bike was real wide and I needed
space when I make my turn.
Q. Okay. Are you certified to drive your bike
before this traffic collision on Base? Did you have to
get a special permit to get it?
A. Yes, sir, I had to get a special permit to ride
on Base.
Q. Did you have to take a test on Base in order to
show them that you could drive -- could ride your
motorcycle?
A. Yes, sir, we did.
Q. And did you have -- I'm sorry.
A. We had to take a test, a written test and a
riding test.
Q. Any troubles taking the written test on the
questions for the -- for on Base riding?
A. No, sir.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
65
Q. Any trouble riding test?
A. No, sir.
Q. And how long had you had -- let me ask it this
way. When do you get that permit to ride on base?
A. It took about a year after I got on the Base so
I can ride my bike.
Q. And what is the reason that you are on Base?
A. I was an auto worker.
Q. For?
A. For ICI. We had a contract or with the Naval
Air Station.
Q. Okay. And so at one year after you start with
ICI, that's when you get your certification to ride on
Base?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Okay. When do you start with ICI?
A. I believe it was 2005.
Q. About ten years ago?
A. Yeah, a long time ago, yes, sir.
Q. Okay. Let's -- I want to talk to you about the
day of the crash. Is that all right?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. When -- how is it that you-all decide to go to
the area of Sinton, or I think it was Mathis a little
earlier. What -- how do you-all decide to go there?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
66
A. My good friend Ruben wanted to -- we were going
to a restaurant and we were -- I was following them to
the restaurant.
Q. And going right before the -- right before the
truck and you crashed when the truck hits you, where are
you going to just before the crash happens?
A. I forgot the name of the restaurant.
Q. Okay. But what city or what area are you
going?
A. Sinton.
Q. Okay. And where had you come from? Where had
you been earlier that afternoon?
A. We were at a pork tasting contest.
Q. Okay.
A. In Mathis.
Q. When you travel with Ruben -- who else was
there with you?
A. Ruben and Shirley and Jesse and his wife.
Q. Okay. So we've heard from Shirley a little
earlier in the trial, Ruben was riding their motorcycle?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Is there a special type of formation that you
follow with Ruben whenever you ride with him?
A. We don't drive as fast as they were. We just
stayed behind, and they wait on us, they pull over and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
67
wait on us.
Q. Okay. Now, you said that Theresa didn't like
speed, she didn't like --
A. Yes.
Q. -- to go fast?
A. Yes.
Q. So whenever you're in an open road or in the
interstate with Theresa back then, how fast would you
go?
A. 55, 60, 65 at the most on a straightaway.
Q. All right. Mr. Garcia, if I ask you to
describe for us how the crash happens, what images do
you see in your mind?
A. I see the 18-wheeler very briefly and it -- it
just -- it just hit me like a bullet, sir. I don't
recall, you know. I was coming around the turn and it
just struck me.
Q. Before you were coming around the turn, are you
in the center of your lane and the middle of your lane?
A. Yes, sir.
MR. BLANCO: May I approach, Your Honor?
THE COURT: Yes.
Q. (BY MR. BLANCO) 188 was a two-way road, true?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Before the curve, the curve will come up on
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
68
top, but before the curve -- and I don't want you to --
just tell me, I'm gonna put my pen, just tell me to move
to the right from the center until you tell me what was
your position --
A. Okay.
Q. -- as you rode that road?
A. Okay.
Q. Before the curve, okay? You tell me to stop.
A. Right there (indicating).
Q. Right here?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. I'm drawing at small rectangle. Is that where
you would ride your motorcycle?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. As a custom?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Always? Did you -- Mr. Garcia, did you ever
ride your motorcycle all the way to the right near the
fog line on the road?
A. No.
Q. And would you ever -- do you ever ride your
motorcycle near the yellow lines?
A. No.
Q. For any purpose?
A. No, sir.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
69
Q. Please tell the jury why not.
A. Because my bike is real wide, it's three-foot
wide and it takes up a lot of room, a lot of space so
when I'm fixing to make my turns or when I -- I just
want -- I don't want -- usually my friends like to
stagger, like to be staggered which is the way --
Q. Like here?
A. Yeah, yeah, like that. And I like to stay in
the center and we staggered, so I -- I have a big bike,
that's the reason why I don't -- I don't like to --
MR. BLANCO: Your Honor, I would like to
inquire if the jury heard that response because they can
barely hear you. Can you hear me?
THE WITNESS: I'm sorry.
MR. BLANCO: Please tell us in the
microphone.
A. When I ride --
Q. (BY MR. BLANCO) Why is it that you do not
stagger, Mr. Garcia?
A. Because my bike's about three-foot wide and I
like to ride in the center of my lane at all times.
Q. Do you have any reason to believe that you were
not in the center of your lane as you're going through
the curve?
A. No, sir.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
70
Q. Are you in the center of your lane --
A. Yes, sir.
Q. -- as you're going to curve?
Now, Mr. Garcia, do you remember your --
when they took your testimony, your deposition; do you
remember that?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Do you remember the things that you said in
your deposition? Not -- not actually, but do you
remember everything you said during your deposition?
A. Some, not -- I don't recall that well.
Q. Okay. I want you, sir, to -- to look into your
mind from memories of this crash. Do you still see the
truck across you coming from your right into your
left --
A. Uh-huh.
Q. -- stopped in front of you, is that what you
still see, sir?
A. No. No, sir.
Q. Do you still think -- do you still feel that
you're trying to avoid the truck by going to the right
of the truck --
MR. WARREN: Objection, leading, Your
Honor.
THE COURT: Sustained.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
71
MR. BLANCO: I am, Your Honor. I
apologize.
Q. (BY MR. BLANCO) Do you still see the truck
going -- I mean, trying to go to your right?
A. It was going to the right --
Q. No, you, you?
A. I was -- no, I didn't go to -- it happened so
fast. It just -- it just hit me like, like I said, like
a bullet. It was -- I was driving real smooth around
that curve and it just -- it just -- it hit me, I didn't
hit it, and it -- it caught my -- it caught me right
behind the fairing, and after that, I blacked out and I
was sliding on my back, that's what I recall, sir.
Q. Do you remember, Mr. Garcia, in your
deposition, how you told us -- I wasn't in the
deposition, but you told all of us --
A. Yeah.
Q. -- that you came to a stop and you see the
truck driver on the cell phone. Do you remember telling
us that?
A. Yes, I do.
Q. Okay. Is that -- are those images that you see
in your mind?
A. That was the image, yes, sir.
Q. And you still see those images?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
72
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And do you still see the images in your mind,
that suddenly, the truck accelerated and it run you
over?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Do you still see the images in your mind that
you are trying to go around the back of the truck to
your right before --
MR. WARREN: Objection, leading, Your
Honor.
THE COURT: Sustained.
Q. (BY MR. BLANCO) Mr. Garcia, in your
deposition, do you tell us that you tried to go to the
right to try to go around the truck, the back part of
the truck?
A. Yes.
MR. WARREN: Again, Your Honor, this is
leading the (inaudible) --
THE REPORTER: Mr. Warren, can you use your
mike, please.
MR. WARREN: Yes. The objection is that
it's leading a critical part of the testimony and
leading the witness.
THE COURT: Try it one more time.
MR. BLANCO: I will, Your Honor.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
73
Q. (BY MR. BLANCO) Do you remember your testimony
at deposition, sir?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. Do you -- even where this crash happened
real fast, and it hit you like a bullet, do you try to
go around the back of the truck to try to avoid it?
A. That's what I see in my image, sir.
Q. Okay. Do you have a memory, sir, of talking to
anybody after you slid off your bike, after you're on
the roadway, do you have any memory of talking to
anybody?
A. I was unconscious. I just remember looking up
and saw my damaged leg, my ankle was next to my knee and
then I saw Theresa, and I just broke out crying and then
I heard the helicopter coming. I don't recall anybody
asking me anything.
Q. You -- you see your leg, you see Theresa?
A. Yes.
Q. What is what you remember next?
A. I remember the helicopter. And the people were
talking to me to make sure that I was alive or -- they
wanted me to say stuff and I just don't remember what I
was saying but I was talking to them.
Q. And the helicopter, then you hear voices --
A. Yes.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
74
Q. -- and they're trying to prompt you to talk?
You can hear your voice talking but you don't know what
you're saying?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Do you -- what is the next thing that you
remember?
A. I remember saying that -- that the truck that
it was in my lane, the truck was in my lane. That's
what I remember saying.
Q. Is the next thing you remember being in the
hospital?
A. Yes, sir. They -- they got me down at the
hospital. I remember that they told me down in the
hospital and rushed me to the emergency where I had to
get surgery right away.
Q. We have some information that you've had about
13 surgeries to your leg?
A. Yes, sir, I did.
Q. Was there a time, sir, where you were told that
they were gonna have to amputate your leg above the
knee?
A. Yeah.
Q. What did you say in response to that?
A. No.
Q. Why not?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
75
A. Because I wanted my legs so -- so they sent me
to -- they made phone calls and sent me to Houston --
Q. Okay.
A. -- to save it.
Q. And after all those surgeries, were they able
to only amputate a leg below the knee?
A. Yes, in Corpus, they were gonna amputate it
above my knee, I told them not to, so they sent me to
Houston and Houston -- Houston told me that we could try
to save the leg but we can't guarantee that it's gonna
stay well, so I told the doctor just cut it to where I
can best have a prosthesis, so he put a plate on my
left, below my knee and about eight bolts to hold it
together. The bone was split in the middle below my
knee. They told me that my leg was torn off my body.
Q. Mr. Garcia, do you understand that there's a
component of your case is how you feel about how your
leg looks; do you understand that part?
A. Yes.
Q. And sir, do you understand, that unfortunately,
there is a need for us to demonstrate to show what is it
that you see every day, is it all right, sir, if you
could show us, you take your prosthesis for about ten
seconds only and just show us briefly. Is it all right
with you, sir?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
76
A. Sure.
MR. BLANCO: Your Honor, permission for the
viewing?
THE COURT: You may.
A. I had to make special pants for my leg.
Q. (BY MR. BLANCO) Okay. And Mr. Garcia, we're
trying to do this -- the easiest way for you so ten
seconds is all I want, sir.
A. (Witness complies.)
THE COURT: You may stand if you need to
see.
A. Okay. It's skin grafts and I still got sores.
It needs to be aired out always, I need to have it aired
out for a year, so I'm gonna need -- I need special
equipment, like a van and wheelchairs and stuff like
that. It's horrible. It's a lot of work.
Q. Thank you, Mr. Garcia.
MR. BLANCO: Thank you, Your Honor.
Q. (BY MR. BLANCO) Mr. Garcia, have you noticed
even these days you have complications, that it's
difficult to take care of your leg?
A. Yes, sir, I have pain every day.
Q. Do you have pain to not just your -- not just
the remaining part of your leg, do you have pain to your
foot that is no longer there?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
77
A. Yes. I have phantom pains a lot, I have
throbbing a lot.
Q. When the pain -- does medication help the pain
or just knock you out, dumb you down?
A. The medication helped the pain, but I didn't
like taking the medication because it kind of messes up
your liver and -- and I'd rather -- I'm a grown man, I
can stand pain.
Q. Let's talk about what you used to like to do
before this crash for entertainment, okay? We know you
worked, so let's talk about work. Did you like work?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. What did you like? What is it about your work
that you liked?
A. The people I work with. I would prep up
equipment for the government, I'd sand, paint, grease
wheels. I was an auto worker at the Base, and then I
owned the Quality Tree Service on my own time.
Q. Did -- were you the kind of guy that if you
looked at a piece of equipment, whether it was a
helicopter parts, or you know, an auto worker, you know,
one of those trailers, that if you looked at it and you
could figure it out without any maps or anything like
that?
A. Yes, sir. We would build them and re --
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
78
refurbish them, the 6K (sic) trailers and the helicopter
blade trailers.
Q. Uh-huh.
A. We would do it, that's what I would do.
Q. And when you were done, did the equipment that
you refurbish, did they look like rebuilt parts?
A. Yes, sir, brand new, they looked brand new.
Q. Do you have to during those -- let me ask it
this way just for foundation. Did you have -- did you
work on Base for ten, eleven years before this crash or
only eight years?
A. I worked on Base eight years.
Q. Eight years. And at ICI doing that type of
auto worker work?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Okay. We saw some numbers from your income.
You were making about 32, 38,000 a year, more or less?
A. Yes.
Q. And was that good money?
A. It was okay, it would pay the bills, sir.
Q. Pay the bills. Did you have -- as part of your
work, did you have to fill out paperwork on the
equipment that you have put together back?
A. Yes, sir, every day.
Q. And did you have any problems with paperwork at
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
79
all --
A. No, sir.
Q. -- before this crash?
Ruben Pena, we understand that he was a
friend of your supervisor?
A. He --
Q. Was it Pina or Pena?
A. Ruben Pena, yes. He was a safety trainer for
the training for the forklift training. He taught
forklift training and other equipment and me and him
would hang out and ride bikes, go to bike rallies.
Q. And if we heard from Doctor -- well, did you
ever get any awards or anything from ICI regarding your
level of work?
A. Bonuses, just --
Q. Just bonuses?
A. Bonuses, yes, sir, a lot of compliments from my
boss.
Q. Were you making extra money at times through --
through either extra overtime or bonuses?
A. Yes, sir, we would work overtime.
Q. So when -- if we saw yesterday, through
Mr. Johnson, that the first three months of the year you
were making enough money so that you would have hit
about $47,000, that would -- that was something that you
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
80
were making bonuses on $2,000 --
A. At times.
Q. At times?
A. Yes.
Q. Okay. We also heard about that you got your
hand hurt at trimming trees and you were no longer
trimming trees while were you doing auto work. Is that
accurate?
A. I didn't get my hand hurt, only on the
accident.
Q. Only in the accident you hurt your hand?
A. I did get carpel tunnel surgery on my right
hand.
Q. Did carpel tunnel surgery from the hand, did
that stop you from trimming trees?
A. No.
Q. You kept on trimming trees until this crash?
A. Yes.
Q. And were you making good side money on those --
on that?
A. Sure.
Q. Every day, every week?
A. Just about.
Q. Remember the story you told me about a lady who
did not want to lose her tree because it was too close
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
81
to the power lines and you had to call -- you had to cut
it at an angle if you had to do it right?
MR. WARREN: Your Honor, I object, this is
certainly leading and testifying by the attorney.
THE COURT: Sustained.
Q. (BY MR. BLANCO) Was there many a time where
you had to you do some special work on a tree that you
feel pretty proud about?
A. Oh, yes, sir, a lot of them, plenty of times.
Q. Could you tell the jury one time about how you
did a very difficult job?
A. I've done a lot of hard, difficult jobs when
trees are growing over main power lines, and safety has
always been in my life real strongly because I used to
trim trees from wires, power lines and I used to -- they
used to send me to do hotshots where people didn't want
you cutting the trees just a little bit so we had to do
very light work and go around the wires, be real -- and
the wires were high voltage wires and it just took a lot
of skill.
Q. Do you have to figure things out when you're
still on the ground up there, how you're gonna do it?
A. Yes, sir, exactly.
Q. Is it correct that once you're up there in the
branches, you kind of lose sense of where you are, you
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
82
have to be very, very attentive?
A. Very careful. You could go out there and tie
in and rope, saddle, pruner, everything, everything, you
know, a little at a time.
Q. Did you ever have -- I'm sorry. All of your
years of motorcycle riding, did you ever have a crash?
A. No, sir.
Q. This is your first one?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Going back to the day of the crash, the night
before, did you have plenty of sleep?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Were you rested as you rode that morning over
towards to Mathis?
A. Yes, sir, I was rested.
Q. I'm gonna talk to you about the beer or
drinking before the crash, okay?
A. Uh-huh.
Q. Do you have a memory before the crash whether
you had anything to drink?
A. I recall one beer.
Q. Do you have any rules or did you have any rules
for yourself before this crash as when you were -- as
the time that you are driving motorcycles, how many
alcoholic beverages you would allow yourself to have?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
83
A. Yes, sir.
Q. What was your rule?
A. Two.
Q. Two beers?
A. Two beers. Usually if I was out of town real
far out, I would just drink two beers.
Q. Okay. Would you allow time between the time
you drink and the time you got back into your bike?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Remember the pulled pork tasting?
A. Yes.
Q. Were you accused of doing a little bit more
than just tasting?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. In your mind, were you just tasting the pulled
pork?
A. Yes, sir, I was tasting it, but it was pretty
good, just a little more than I was supposed to.
Q. Okay. In terms of -- I understand that there
was crackers and water?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And did they allow you to take anything other
than crackers and waters in between the tasting?
A. No.
Q. Okay. And after you were all done tasting, did
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
84
you leave right away toward Sinton?
A. Yes, sir, Ruben mentioned about the restaurant.
Q. Do you have a memory at the hospital of telling
anyone that you had three beers that day?
A. No.
Q. But for sure, you remember one?
A. Yes.
Q. Were you ever told by anybody what your blood
alcohol level was at the hospital?
A. Yes.
Q. It was below zero, right?
A. Yes.
Q. Going back -- and I'm sorry I jumped. Going
back to the things that you like to do, is fishing one
of them?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. What about fishing you like?
A. I used to love to go surf fishing. I can't do
that no more because of my leg.
Q. Sure.
A. But they -- they throw it out for me and bring
it back to my truck so that's all right. There's a lot
of things I can't do that I used to do.
Q. Right. Did you hear your sister Belinda talk
about your room?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
85
A. Yes.
Q. Is she right?
A. Yes.
Q. Does it embarrass you not to be able to take
care of your room?
A. I'm gonna take care of it, it's just right now,
I can't.
Q. Do you these days need Belinda to take care of
your money and to take care of your bills and everything
else?
A. She helps me a lot, yes, when I need it.
Q. Can you do it?
A. Sure.
Q. You can write checks, right?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And you believe, you think that you can --
strike that. Let me ask it a different way. Do you
think that you can handle your balance -- personal
balance checking account?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Do you know if you ever had any trouble with
overdraft or not enough money, or things just don't make
sense to you?
A. When I was married, I did.
Q. All right. What do you still do, these days to
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
86
have some enjoyment of your life, what do you do?
A. I -- I've always liked to exercise, and I like
to eat, so I got to stay -- I do stand, I can stand, and
exercise in my garage. My son bought one of those that
you lay down and you work, I guess, it's a Chuck Norris
thing, and that helps me a lot, and then I hit the bag
still sometimes. In moderation, because my leg starts
hurting after I have it on for about an hour or so, it
starts hurting so I take it off and rest it, and then I
continue on, and I sweat, you know. He put a bag
underneath and I sweat, and that's what I do for
entertainment to help my weight down, to keep my weight
down.
Q. Do you have any grandchildren?
A. Yes, sir, I have seven.
Q. Do you play with them?
A. All the time.
Q. Is that a good thing for you?
A. Oh, I love them all.
Q. If you didn't have your grandchildren, it would
be rougher?
A. (Nodding head up and down.)
Q. Other than them hitting that bag sometimes, and
playing with your grandchildren, do you do much of
anything else?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
87
A. I like to mess with my plants. I got flowers
and around -- I had a -- I live in a corner house and I
-- we didn't have sidewalks so I had the City gave me
permission to make a sidewalk so -- and I just put a
ramp in the back of my house, not in the front, so I get
out through the back all time in my Jazzy, and I spend
time with my grandkids and I mess with -- we water
plants in the morning when they were staying there,
yeah, especially my grandson.
Q. You do follow the doctor's instructions to take
care of your -- of your hand and to take care of your
mind and to take care of your leg, right?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. The leg doesn't always work out well?
A. Not really. They say I need therapy all the
time. I soak it in hot water, I -- I work my hands a
lot. My hands, I can't close my left hand anymore, but
I can still hit the bag slowly.
Q. Can you -- can you type things up or can you
button, do you need help with the left hand?
A. I have a hard time.
Q. You have a hard time. Are you doing the best
you can?
A. Yes, sir, I am.
Q. Are you giving up?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
88
A. I'm not giving up, sir. I -- I live alone and
I'm all right.
Q. In terms of moving around, we know you still
drive a little bit, right?
A. Yes, sir, I do.
Q. No more motorcycles?
A. No more motorcycles.
Q. Is your prosthesis the only way that you move
around or do you use walkers and chairs?
A. I have a walker and I have a -- I have
crutches. At times I need to use those.
Q. We saw Dr. Dillman, you know, now use a
motorized chair. Do you also use one?
A. I have one.
Q. You use one?
A. And I have another one on layaway.
Q. A manual one?
A. A Jazzy, a better one.
Q. A different type. All right. Mr. Garcia, is
there any way that you were anywhere else other than in
your lane when the truck hit you?
A. I was in my lane, sir.
MR. BLANCO: Pass the witness, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Do you have any questions?
MR. EDWARDS: I do.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
89
THE COURT: I think we're gonna break for
lunch because we -- I think -- it just be best if we do
it at this time.
Please be reminded of the instructions, and
I need you back at 1:15.
THE BAILIFF: All rise for the jury.
(Jury exits courtroom.)
(Noon recess.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SARA E. RIVERA, CSR, CRR
90
THE STATE OF TEXAS *
COUNTY OF NUECES *
I, Sara E. Rivera, Official Court Reporter,
in and for the 117th District Court of Nueces County,
State of Texas, do hereby certify that the above and
foregoing contains a true and correct transcription of
daily copy transcript of all portions of evidence and
other proceedings requested in writing by counsel for
the parties to be included in this volume of the
Reporter's Record, in the above-styled and numbered
cause, all of which occurred in open court or in
chambers and were reported by me.
WITNESS MY OFFICIAL HAND, this the 11th day
of December, 2015.
/s/ Sara E. RiveraSARA E. RIVERA, Texas CSR 4626Expiration date: 12/31/2017Official Court Reporter117th District Court901 Leopard Street, Room 901.01Corpus Christi, Texas 78401361-888-0658
Recommended