View
1.496
Download
0
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
In this talk, I will show how CMS (Content Management Systems) benefit from using a Graph Database as storage layer by highlighting ten illustrative reasons. To support each statements, I will compare different Open Source CMS (including one Graph-CMS) regarding data model, persistence technology, cache layers and strategies, and show some performance numbers and diagrams. And as a historical sidenote, I will talk about Neo4j's CMS roots, enriched with some background information from the founders. Axel Morgner Axel is founder of structr—a free, open-source CMS and Content Management Framework based on the graph database Neo4j. He previously founded inxire GmbH, and was consultant and project manager at Oracle. After leaving the enterprise SQL world behind in 2010, he enjoys now being back to cutting egde technology every day. He’s based in Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Citation preview
Ten Reasons WhyYou Should Use aGraph DatabaseFor Your CMS
GraphConnect, San Francisco, 6th Nov 2012Axel Morgner (@amorgner), founder of structr
About me
- 10+ yrs Oracle & ECM- founded inxire (ECM based on Oracle)- left 2010 to start over from scratch- met Peter Neubauer in Frankfurt- started structr
About structr- started as CMS/CMF- open sourced 31 May 2011- today: 0.6 about to be released
structr Server structr Ui
More info about structr
Website:http://structr.org
Source Code:https://github.com/structr/structr
Forum/Mailing List:https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/structr
Twitter:@structr
Ten Reasons ...
#1Graph Databaseswere made for
Content Management
Content Management
Content Management
Pages
Sites HTML Elements
Content Management
PicturesFiles
Pages
Sites HTML Elements
Texts
Content Management
Pictures
Videos
Sounds
Files
Folders
Users
Pages
Sites HTML Elements
Texts
Content Management
Pictures
Videos
Sounds
Files
Folders
Categories
Taxonomies
Terms
Users
GroupsRoles
Pages
Sites HTML Elements
Texts
Content Management
Pictures
Videos
Sounds
Files
Folders
Categories
Taxonomies
Terms
Users
GroupsRoles
Pages
Sites HTML Elements
Texts
Content Management
Pictures
Videos
Sounds
Files
Folders
Categories
Taxonomies
Terms
Users
GroupsRoles
Pages
Sites HTML Elements
Texts
CONTAINS
CONTAINS
CONTAINSACTS_IN
CONTAINS
LINK
LINK
CONTAINS
TAG
TAG
CONTAINS
IS_A
LINK
LINK CONTAINS
Neo4j wasinitially made for
Content Management
Q: What were the main reasons for you to create Neo4j?
A: We quickly saw that a part of the system was very "networky", and the relational database did not handle many-to-many relationships very well, and not even one-to-many relationships.
We ended up doing joins, and performance was very, very bad. So that's when we started to try different data models than the relational model, and see if we could use that to solve our business problems.
Q: All the CMS created at that time, in the early 2000s, were using an O/R mapping layer. So it was quite extra-ordinary that you did not go this way. What gave you the freedom to do that?A: We were young and naïve. :-) And we had a funding at that time, [...] so we decided to try it out. And here we are today.
Q: Permission resolution, was it a particular problem you were faced with?A: Oh yes, well, but we didn't see that at first. The actual problem we used as a starting point was the automatic translation between languages.
#1Graph Databases1
were made forContent Management2
1 at least Neo4j2 not exclusively
#2O/R Mapping
Core Data
Core Data
#2No O/R Mapping
=Less Code
Less Runtime ObjectsLess Complexity
#3Visualization
#3Graph Visualization
=Understand how your
data is connected
#4Schema
Content Graph
Pictures
Videos
Sounds
Files
Folders
Categories
Taxonomies
Terms
Users
GroupsRoles
Pages
Sites HTML Elements
Texts
CONTAINS
CONTAINS
CONTAINSACTS_IN
CONTAINS
LINK
LINK
CONTAINS
TAG
TAG
CONTAINS
IS_A
LINK
LINK CONTAINS
Domains as Sub Graphs
Pictures
Videos
Sounds
Files
Folders
Categories
Taxonomies
Terms
Users
GroupsRoles
Pages
Sites HTML Elements
Texts
CONTAINS
CONTAINS
CONTAINSACTS_IN
CONTAINS
LINK
LINK
CONTAINS
TAG
TAG
CONTAINS
IS_A
LINK
LINK CONTAINS
#4No Fixed Schema
=Flexibility
Late Optimization
#5Templates
Page Rendering<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title>${content.title!}</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>${content.title!}</h1>
</body>
Page Template
Database
Data Objects
Page Rendering<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title>${content.title!}</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>${content.title!}</h1>
</body>
Page Template
Database
Data Objects O/R Layer
Page Rendering<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title>${content.title!}</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>${content.title!}</h1>
</body>
Page Template
Database
Data ObjectsTemplateEngine O/R Layer
Page Rendering<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title>${content.title!}</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>${content.title!}</h1>
</body>
Page Template
Database
Data Objects O/R LayerTemplateEngine
WebServer
Page Rendering<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title>${content.title!}</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>${content.title!}</h1>
</body>
Page Template
Database
Data Objects O/R LayerTemplateEngine
WebServer
Page Rendering<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title>${content.title!}</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>${content.title!}</h1>
</body>
Page Template
Database
Data Objects O/R LayerTemplateEngine
WebServer
Page Rendering<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title>${content.title!}</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>${content.title!}</h1>
</body>
Page Template
Database
Data Objects O/R LayerTemplateEngine
WebServer
Page Rendering<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<title>${content.title!}</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>${content.title!}</h1>
</body>
Page Template
Database
Data Objects O/R LayerTemplateEngine
WebServer
Page Rendering
RenderingEngine
WebServer
Page Rendering
Database:Content Graph
Data Objects:Content Graph
RenderingEngine
WebServer
#5No (classic) Templates
=Reduced Complexity
Less Caching
#6Caching
Caching Benchmark
0
12,5
25
37,5
50
req/s (w/o caching) 0
46
109
Wordpress 3.4.2 Drupal 7.16 structr 0.6 Apache
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
req/s (w/ caching)
3500
13191244
320
#6Less Caching
=Less Cache Sync./Invalid.
Less Cache Objects
#7Permission Resolution
ACLs
http://blog.neo4j.org/2010/02/access-control-lists-graph-database-way.html
ACLs
ACLs
ACLs
ACLs
#7Real-time ACL
Resolution=
Fast Access toProtected Content
#8Memory Footprint
#9Dependencies
#10Complex Features
Example: Versioning
Folder A
Document X
CONTAINS
Folder B
Document X
CONTAINS
t0 t1
Example: Versioning
Folder A
CONTAINS
Document X
Example: Versioning
Folder B
Document X
CONTAINS
Example: Versioning
Folder A
CONTAINS
Folder B
Document X
CONTAINS
valid_until: t1 valid_from: t1
Example: Versioning
Folder A
CONTAINS
Folder B
Document X
CONTAINS
valid_until: t1 valid_from: t1
User 1
SECURITYread: true
write: falsevalid_from: t2
SECURITYread: truewrite: true
valid_until: t2
Example: Versioning
Folder A
CONTAINS
Folder B
Document X
User 1
SECURITYread: truewrite: true
valid_until: t2
t0
Example: Versioning
Folder A Folder B
Document X
CONTAINS
User 1
SECURITYread: truewrite: true
t1
Example: Versioning
Folder A Folder B
Document X
CONTAINS
User 1
SECURITYread: true
write: false
t2
Conclusions
ConclusionsNo O/R mappingLess cachingEasy visualization
Simplicity
ConclusionsNo O/R mappingLess cachingEasy visualization
Real-time ACL resolutionSmaller memory footprintLess dependencies
Simplicity
Performance
ConclusionsNo O/R mappingLess cachingEasy visualization
Real-time ACL resolutionSmaller memory footprintLess dependencies
Complex features are easierNo (classic) templatesNo fixed schema
Simplicity
Performance
Flexibility
Graph Databaseswere made for
Content Management
Thank you!
Recommended