View
217
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
1
NuTeV Anomaly NuTeV Anomaly & & Strange-Antistrange Asymmetric Strange-Antistrange Asymmetric
Sea Sea Bo-Qiang MaBo-Qiang Ma Department of Physics, Peking UniversityDepartment of Physics, Peking University August 16, August 16, 2002004, talk at ICHEP04, Beijing4, talk at ICHEP04, Beijing
?
In collaboration with Yong Ding PLB590(2004)216
hep-ph/0405178
2
OutlineOutline
• The NuTeV anamoly and Paschos-Wolfenstein The NuTeV anamoly and Paschos-Wolfenstein
relation relation
• A brief review on strange-antistrange asymmetry of A brief review on strange-antistrange asymmetry of
the nucleon seathe nucleon sea
• The strange-antistrange asymmetry in the light-The strange-antistrange asymmetry in the light-
cone baryon-meson fluctuation mdelcone baryon-meson fluctuation mdel
• SummarySummary
3
Weinberg Angle from Nuetrino DIS: Weinberg Angle from Nuetrino DIS: NuTeV AnamolyNuTeV Anamoly
• NuTeV Collaboration reported result, PRL88(02)091802
• Other electroweak processes
• The three standard deviations could be an indication of new physics beyond standard model if it cannot be explained in conventional physics
2sin 0.2227 0.0004w
2sin 0.2277 0.0013(stat) 0.0009(syst)w
4
• The Paschos-Wolfenstein relation
• The assumptions for the P-W relationship a isoscalar target
b charge symmetry c symmetric strange and antistrange distributions
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )p np ns x s x s x s x ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
p np nc x c x c x c x
5
• Non-isoscalar target correction
a neutron excess correction (p<n) (S. Kumano (PRD66:111301,2002), the correction is small ; S. A. Kulagin (PRD67:091301,2003), gave the correction is -0.004 ;
S. Davidson et. al (JHEP,0202: 037,2002), no exactly correction. )
b nuclear shadowing and anti-shadowing effect
(S. Kuvalenko, I. Schmit and J.J,Yang (杨建军) (PLB546:68,2002), gave the correction changes its sign from -0.00098 to 0.00178; J. W, Qiu and I. Vitev (hep-ph/0401062), providing 2% for the discrepancy)
c EMC effect
6
• Charge symmetry violation
Perturbative method a quark model (E. Sather, (PLB274:433,1992)) obtained the correction is -0.002, which could reduce the discrepancy 40% )
b twist two valence parton distributions (J. T. Londergan and A. W. Thomas, (PLB558:132,2003;PRD 67:111901, 2003)) obtained the result should remove roughly
one-third of the discrepancy)
7
c comparing the structure functions (C. Boros, J. T. Londergan and A. W. Thomas (PRL81:4075,1998;PRD59:074021,1999) thought the CSV in the nucleon sea is predominant and much larger than the valence quarks)
d other calculations about CSV (B. Q. Ma (PLB274:111,1992); C. J. Benesh and T. Goldman (PRC55:441,1997) R. M. Davidson and M. Burkardt (PLB403:134,1997); C. J. Benesh and J. T. Londergan (PRC58:1218,1998) C. Boros, et. al (PLB468:161,1999) )
8
non-perturbative method meson cloud model
F. G. Cao(曹福广 ) and A. I. Signal (PRC62:015203,2000),
found the CSV in both the valence quark distribution
and the nucleon sea are smaller (below 1%) than
most quark model predictions (2%-10%) and did not
give the correction to the discrepancy
9
• Asymmetric strange-antistrange sea quark distributions
meson cloud model: F. G. Cao and A.I. Signal, PLB559(03)229
it is concluded that the asymmetry of the strange and anti-strange is small and could not affect the discrepancy
10
The Strange-Antistrange AsymmetryThe Strange-Antistrange Asymmetry
The strange quark and antiquark distributions
are symmetric at leading-orders of
perturbative QCD( ) ( )s x s x
However, it has been argued that there is strange-antistrange distribution
asymmetry in pQCD evolution at three-loops from non-vanishing up and down
quark valence densities.
hep-ph/0404240, S.Catani et al.
11
Strange-Antistrange AsymmetryStrange-Antistrange Asymmetry from Non-Perturbative Sourcesfrom Non-Perturbative Sources
• Meson Cloud Model A.I. Signal and A.W. Thomas, PLB191(87)205
• Chiral Field M. Burkardt and J. Warr, PRD45(92)958
• Baryon-Meson Fluctuation S.J. Brodsky and B.-Q. Ma, PLB381(96)317
( ) ( ) at large s x s x x
( ) ( ) at large s x s x x
( ) ( ) at large s x s x x
13
Strange-Antistrange Asymmetry Strange-Antistrange Asymmetry in phenomenological analysesin phenomenological analyses
• V. Barone et al. Global Analysis, EPJC12(00)243
• NuTeV dimuon analysis, hep-ex/0405037
• CTEQ Global Analysis, F. Olness et. al (hep-ph/0312323),
[ ( ) ( )] 0.002x s x s x dx
[ ( ) ( )] 0.0013 0.0016x s x s x dx
[ ( ) ( )] 0.001 0.004x s x s x dx With large uncertainties
14
A brief commentA brief comment
More precision determinations of strange-antistrange asymmetry should be performed or some sensitive quantities should be used to measure the strangeness asymmetry
15
Modified P-W relationship
• The cross section for neutrino-nucleon DIS
a for neutral current interaction
20
Strange-antistrange asymmetry
• In light-cone baryon-meson fluctuation model
• The dominant baryon-meson configuration for s-sbar
25
The probabilities for meson-baryon fluctuation
• General case
• Our case
( )3% 6%
KP
( )4% 10%
KP
Brodsky & Ma, PLB381(96)317
Ma, Schmidt, Yang, EPJA12(01)353
27
The results for
• For Gaussian wave function
• For power law wave function
However, we have also very large Qv (around a factor
of 3 larger) in our model calculation, so the ratio of
S‾/Qv is reasonable
28
The results • For Gaussian wave function
the discrepancy from 0.005 to 0.0033(0.0009)
• For power law wave function
the discrepancy from 0.005 to 0.0036(0.0016)
Remove the discrepancy 30%-80%between NuTev and other values of Weinberg angle
0.0017 0.0041SR
0.0014 0.0034SR
29
s(x)/sbar(x) asymmetry
s(x)/sbar(x) could be compatible with data by by including some intrinsic strange
sea contributions
CCFR and NuTeV experimental analyses break net zero strangeness ( ) ( )s x dx s x dx
30
A Further Chiral Quark Model Study
• A further study by using chiral quark model also shows that this strange-antistrange asymmetry has a significant contribution to the Paschos-Wolfenstein relation and can explain the anomaly without sensitivity to input parameters.
Recommended