View
220
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
1
Cytologic Features of Urothelial Carcinoma in Catheterized Urine with Cellular Fragments
萬芳醫院 陳嘉偉
Mohamed El-Fakharany, M.D. et al.ACTA CYTOLOGICA May-June 2006
2
Objective To identify architectural and cytomorp
hologic differences that might help distinguish urothelial neoplasms from instrument
ation artifact
3
Introduction (1) Powerful tools for screening bladder tumors is the urine cytology smear Several findings that can help the cytopathologist diagnose bladder
neoplasms on these smears. Presence of cellular fragments in voided
urine specimens, especially in patients with no history of renal stones, strongly raises the suspicion of a tissue-shedding bladder neoplasm.
4
catheterized urine specimens, these tissue fragments usually present a challenge to the cytopathologist
mechanical trauma (also known as instrumentation artifact) or due to a true bladder neoplasm (particularly low grade neoplasms).
Introduction (2)
5
Introduction (3)This instrumentation artifact can cause a rate of false positive diagnosis of urothelial
neoplasms (e.g., urothelial carcinoma) as high as 11%
( Rife CC, et al,Urol Clin North Am 1979;6:599–612)
6
Introduction (4)
Study to identify the cytomorphologic differences between cellular fragments
shed by bladder tumors and those shed by
mechanical instrumentation trauma.
7
Study DesignExamined 73 cytologic smears of
catheterized urine containing urothelial cell clusters - 1998 and 2004.
All patients had at least 1 follow-up biopsy. Smears were reviewed for several morphologic features blindly, without knowledge of the follow-up diagnosis.
8
Materials and Methods (1)15,000 urine cytology smears - 1998
and 2004. Identified 73 smears of catheterized urine specimens
diagnosis (artifact vs. neoplasm), and each had at
least 1 follow-up urinary bladder biopsy for definitive diagnosis.
9
Reviewed features: a thin rim of cytoplasm (collar) around cell fragments (present vs. absent)
Fragment border (regular vs. irregular)Nuclear diameterNuclear chromatin (fine vs. coarse)Nucleoli (prominent, present or not
seen)Background inflammation (present vs.
absent).
Materials and Methods (2)
10
The nuclear and fragment diameters were measured
along the long axis using a calibrated eyepiece.
Results were then analyzed (χ2 test) against the
follow-up diagnosis to determine which parameters
were significant in distinguishing benign cell clusters from urothelial carcinoma
Materials and Methods (3)
11
Results 73 smears- 39 benign diagnosis 34 urothelial carcinoma on biopsy Review results: significant differences
between benign and malignant cases with respect to 4 features:
cytoplasmic collar, fragment border,nuclear chromatin and nuclear
diameter.
12
ResultsFragment border (cytoplasmic collar) Benign cases 74% (29 of 39) Malignant cases 15% (5 of 34)
(p < 0.0001) (Figure 1)
13
Figure 1 Cytoplasmic collar.(A) Instrumentation artifact. (B)Urothelial carcinoma.
A B
14
Results Regular and rounded fragment
borders Benign cases, 80% (31 of 39) malignant cases, 24% (8 of 34) Irregular and/or ragged fragment
edges 76% ( 26 of 34) (p < 0.0001) (Figure 2)
15
Figure 2 Fragment border.(A) Instrumentation artifact. (B)Urothelial carcinoma.
A B
16
Results Nuclear chromatin -fine and evenly
dispersed Benign cases-64% (25 of 39)
Malignant cases 18% (6 of 34); Nuclear chromatin -coarse and clumped Malignant cases 82%
(p < 0.0001) (Figure 3)
17
Figure 3 Nuclear chromatin.(A) Instrumentation artifact. (B)Urothelial carcinoma.
A B
18
Results Nuclear size Benign cases –12 μm Malignant cases – 16 μm
Maximum nuclear diameter of 20 - 7 cases; proven
malignant on follow-up biopsy
(p < 0.0001) (Figure 4)
19
Figure 4 Nuclear diameter.(A) Instrumentation artifact. (B)Urothelial carcinoma.
A B
20
ResultsParameter Artifact Neoplasm
Collar around cell fragments Present Absent
Fragment border Regular Irregular
Nuclear chromatin Fine Coarse
Nuclear diameter >16 μm 12 μm
Nucleoli PresentPresent or not present
Background inflammation Present Absent
21
Discussion (1) Low grade bladder malignancy vs.
catheterized urine specimens ( 0-73%)
Lack of distinguish between cellular fragments due to true bladder neoplasms,
mechanical traumaRife CC, et al , Urol Clin North Am 1979 6. Koss LG, Dietch D, et al,Acta Cytol 1985 Shenoy UA, et al, Cancer 1985
22
Discussion (2) Irregular,ragged border, absent
cytoplasmic collar and coarse nuclear chromatin were combined, the sensitivity for diagnosing true malignant cellular fragments was 100% and the specificity, 94%.
Nuclear diameter of ≥ 20 μm was 100% specific for malignancy
23
Discussion (3)The concurrent presence of the above
features is a powerful tool that should be used by
the cytopathologist to screen out urothelial carcinoma in catheter urine cytology
Avoid unnecessary follow-up procedures and help provide more efficient health care
24
ConclusionCertain architectural and
nuclear features can help differentiate urothelial
neoplasms from instrumentation artifact in
urine cytologic smears.
25
Thanks for your attention
Recommended