Disambiguation Effect: › Ambiguity task with a familiar object and an unfamiliar object ›...

Preview:

Citation preview

Disambiguation Effect:› Ambiguity task with a familiar object and an

unfamiliar object › Children choose the unfamiliar object when

presented with an unfamiliar name

Children as young as 15 months disambiguate (Markman, Wasow, & Hansen, 2003)

Phonetic similarity disrupts disambiguation (Merriman & Schuster, 1991)

Preschoolers disambiguate even when the adult gestures toward the familiar object (Jaswal & Hansen, 2006)

To investigate how children with SLI resolve ambiguity in a disambiguation task given three word conditions: › a phonetically distinct (PD) word, › a phonetically similar (PS) word, › and an oppositional gesture (OG) combined

with a PD word

36 object pairs : one familiar object and one unfamiliar object › 30 experimental trials

(10 PD, 10 PS, 10 OG) › 6 real word foils

The OG trial: pointing to the familiar object (e.g., the bowl) while simultaneously asking for an object with a PD word (e.g., “Get the clird”)

15 Children: 10 Boys and 5 Girls 3 Groups: SLI, TD Chronological Age (CA)

peers, and TD Language Age (LA) peers

Groups Age Age

Equivalent

NDW

SLI

n = 5

5;0 to 6;11

M = 72

42-64

M = 51

62-95

M = 75

CA

n = 5

5;0 to 6;11

M = 72

72-84

M = 81

89-108

M = 98

LA

n = 5

3;5 to 5;0

M = 48

39-76

M = 61

69-95

M = 83

Participants

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Se

lect

ion

s o

f U

nfa

mili

ar

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

=SLI<CA5 LA

Participants

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Se

lectio

ns o

f U

nfa

mili

ar

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

=SLI<CA5 LA

Participants

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Se

lectio

ns o

f U

nfa

mili

ar

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

=SLI<CA5 LA

5 and 6 year olds with SLI selected unfamiliar objects more than chance but significantly less often than same-age typically developing children

Could explain fast mapping deficits

SLI: select familiar objects with PS words

TD: show varied responses

May be explained by › differences in lexical and phonological

activation› limited processing capacity

7/10 TD children selected unfamiliar objects, overriding the gesture to the familiar object

SLI made random selections

Multiple factors in the event may be processed more flexibly by TD children

Christina H. Fikes, M.S. challer15@yahoo.com

Julie M. Estis, Ph.D., CCC-SLP

jestis@usouthal.edu

Brenda L. Beverly. Ph.D., CCC-SLP bbeverly@usouthal.edu

Recommended