View
223
Download
2
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
Chapter
Inferences on Two Samples
11
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
Section
Inference about Two Means: Dependent Samples
11.1
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-3
Objectives
1. Distinguish between independent and dependent sampling
2. Test hypotheses regarding matched-pairs data
3. Construct and interpret confidence intervals about the population mean difference of matched-pairs data
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-4
Objective 1
• Distinguish between Independent and Dependent Sampling
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-5
A sampling method is independent when the individuals selected for one sample do not dictate which individuals are to be in a second sample. A sampling method is dependent when the individuals selected to be in one sample are used to determine the individuals to be in the second sample.
Dependent samples are often referred to as matched-pairs samples.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-6
For each of the following, determine whether the sampling method is independent or dependent.
a) A researcher wants to know whether the price of a one night stay at a Holiday Inn Express is less than the price of a one night stay at a Red Roof Inn. She randomly selects 8 towns where the location of the hotels is close to each other and determines the price of a one night stay.
b) A researcher wants to know whether the “state” quarters (introduced in 1999) have a mean weight that is different from “traditional” quarters. He randomly selects 18 “state” quarters and 16 “traditional” quarters and compares their weights.
Parallel Example 1: Distinguish between Independent and Dependent Sampling
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-7
a) The sampling method is dependent since the 8 Holiday Inn Express hotels can be matched with one of the 8 Red Roof Inn hotels by town.
b) The sampling method is independent since the “state” quarters which were sampled had no bearing on which “traditional” quarters were sampled.
Solution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-8
Objective 2
• Test Hypotheses Regarding Matched-Pairs Data
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-9
“In Other Words”
Statistical inference methods on matched-pairs data use the same methods as inference on a single population mean with unknown, except that the differences are analyzed.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-10
To test hypotheses regarding the mean difference of matched-pairs data, the following must be satisfied:
1. the sample is obtained using simple random sampling
2. the sample data are matched pairs,
3. the differences are normally distributed with no outliers or the sample size, n, is large (n ≥ 30).
Testing Hypotheses Regarding the Differenceof Two Means Using a Matched-Pairs Design
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-11
Step 1: Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. The hypotheses can be structured in one of three ways, where d is the population mean difference of the matched-pairs data.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-12
Step 2: Select a level of significance, , based on the seriousness of making a Type I error.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-13
Step 3: Compute the test statistic
which approximately follows Student’s t-distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom. The values of and sd are the mean and standard deviation of the differenced data.
t0 d sd
n
d
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-14
Step 4: Use Table VI to determine the critical value using n-1 degrees of freedom.
Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-15
Classical Approach
(critical value)
Two-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-16
Classical Approach
(critical value)
Left-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-17
Classical Approach
(critical value)
Right-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-18
Step 5: Compare the critical value with the test statistic:
Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-19
Step 4: Use Table VI to determine the P-value using n-1 degrees of freedom.
P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-20
P-Value Approach
Two-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-21
P-Value Approach
Left-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-22
P-Value Approach
Right-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-23
Step 5: If P-value < , reject the null hypothesis.
P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-24
Step 6: State the conclusion.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-25
These procedures are robust, which means that minor departures from normality will not adversely affect the results. However, if the data have outliers, the procedure should not be used.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-26
The following data represent the cost of a one night stay in Hampton Inn Hotels and La Quinta Inn Hotels for a random sample of 10 cities. Test the claim that Hampton Inn Hotels are priced differently than La Quinta Hotels at the =0.05 level of significance.
Parallel Example 2: Testing a Claim Regarding Matched-Pairs Data
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-27
City Hampton Inn La Quinta
Dallas 129 105
Tampa Bay 149 96
St. Louis 149 49
Seattle 189 149
San Diego 109 119
Chicago 160 89
New Orleans 149 72
Phoenix 129 59
Atlanta 129 90
Orlando 119 69
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-28
This is a matched-pairs design since the hotel prices come from the same ten cities. To test the hypothesis, we first compute the differences and then verify that the differences come from a population that is approximately normally distributed with no outliers because the sample size is small.
The differences (Hampton - La Quinta) are:
24 53 100 40 -10 71 77 70 39 50
with = 51.4 and sd = 30.8336.
Solution
d
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-29
No violation of normality assumption.
Solution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-30No outliers.
Solution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-31
Step 1: We want to determine if the prices differ:
H0: d = 0 versus H1: d 0
Step 2: The level of significance is =0.05.
Step 3: The test statistic is
Solution
t0 51.4
30.833610
5.2716.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-32
Step 4: This is a two-tailed test so the critical values at the =0.05 level of significance with n-1=10-1=9 degrees of freedom
are -t0.025=-2.262 and t0.025=2.262.
Solution: Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-33
Step 5: Since the test statistic, t0=5.27 is greater than the critical value t.025=2.262, we reject the null hypothesis.
Solution: Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-34
Step 4: Because this is a two-tailed test, the P-value is two times the area under the t-distribution with n-1=10-1=9 degrees of freedom to the right of the test statistic t0=5.27. That is, P-value = 2P(t > 5.27) ≈ 2(0.00026)=0.00052 (using technology). Approximately 5 samples in 10,000 will yield results as extreme as we obtained if the null hypothesis is true.
Solution: P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-35
Step 5: Since the P-value is less than the level of significance =0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
Solution: P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-36
Step 6: There is sufficient evidence to conclude that Hampton Inn hotels and La Quinta hotels are priced differently at the =0.05 level of significance.
Solution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-37
Objective 3
• Construct and Interpret Confidence Intervals for the Population Mean Difference of Matched-Pairs Data
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-38
A (1-)100% confidence interval for d is given by
Lower bound:
Upper bound:
The critical value t/2 is determined using n-1 degrees of freedom.
Confidence Interval for Matched-Pairs Data
d t2
sd
n
d t2
sd
n
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-39
Note: The interval is exact when the population is normally distributed and approximately correct for nonnormal populations, provided that n is large.
Confidence Interval for Matched-Pairs Data
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-40
Construct a 90% confidence interval for the mean difference in price of Hampton Inn versus La Quinta hotel rooms.
Parallel Example 4: Constructing a Confidence Interval for Matched-Pairs Data
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-41
• We have already verified that the differenced data come from a population that is approximately normal with no outliers.
• Recall = 51.4 and sd = 30.8336.
• From Table VI with = 0.10 and 9 degrees of freedom, we find t/2 = 1.833.
Solution
d
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-42
Thus,
• Lower bound =
• Upper bound =
We are 90% confident that the mean difference in hotel room price for Ramada Inn versus La Quinta Inn is between $33.53 and $69.27.
Solution
51.4 1.83330.8336
10
33.53
51.4 1.83330.8336
10
69.27
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
Section
Inference about Two Means: Independent Samples
11.2
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-44
Objectives
1. Test hypotheses regarding the difference of two independent means
2. Construct and interpret confidence intervals regarding the difference of two independent means
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-45
Suppose that a simple random sample of size n1 is taken from a population with unknown mean 1 and unknown standard deviation 1. In addition, a simple random sample of size n2 is taken from a population with unknown mean 2 and unknown standard deviation 2. If the two populations are normally distributed or the sample sizes are sufficiently large (n1 ≥ 30, n2 ≥ 30) , then
approximately follows Student’s t-distribution with the smaller of n1-1 or n2-1 degrees of freedom where is the sample mean and si
is the sample standard deviation from population i.
Sampling Distribution of the Difference of Two Means: Independent Samples with Population
Standard Deviations Unknown (Welch’s t)
t x 1 x 2 1 2
s12
n1
s22
n2
x i
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-46
Objective 1
• Test Hypotheses Regarding the Difference of Two Independent Means
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-47
To test hypotheses regarding two population means, 1 and 2, with unknown population standard deviations, we can use the following steps, provided that:
1. the samples are obtained using simple random sampling;
2. the samples are independent;3. the populations from which the samples are drawn
are normally distributed or the sample sizes are large (n1 ≥ 30, n2 ≥ 30).
Testing Hypotheses Regarding the Difference of Two Means
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-48
Step 1: Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. The hypotheses are structured in one of three ways:
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-49
Step 2: Select a level of significance, , based on the seriousness of making a Type I error.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-50
Step 3: Compute the test statistic
which approximately follows Student’s t- distribution.
t0 x 1 x 2 1 2
s12
n1
s22
n2
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-51
Step 4: Use Table VI to determine the criticalvalue using the smaller of n1 -1 or n2 -1 degrees of freedom.
Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-52
Classical Approach
(critical value)
Two-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-53
Classical Approach
(critical value)
Left-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-54
Classical Approach
(critical value)
Right-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-55
Step 5: Compare the critical value with the test statistic:
Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-56
Step 4: Use Table VI to determine the P-value using the smaller of n1 -1 or n2 -1 degrees of freedom.
P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-57
P-Value Approach
Two-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-58
P-Value Approach
Left-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-59
P-Value Approach
Right-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-60
Step 5: If P-value < , reject the null hypothesis.
P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-61
Step 6: State the conclusion.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-62
These procedures are robust, which means that minor departures from normality will not adversely affect the results. However, if the data have outliers, the procedure should not be used.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-63
A researcher wanted to know whether “state” quarters had a weight that is more than “traditional” quarters. He randomly selected 18 “state” quarters and 16 “traditional” quarters, weighed each of them and obtained the following data.
Parallel Example 1: Testing Hypotheses Regarding Two Means
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-64
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-65
Test the claim that “state” quarters have a mean weight that is more than “traditional” quarters at the =0.05 level of significance.
NOTE: A normal probability plot of “state” quarters indicates the population could be normal. A normal probability plot of “traditional” quarters indicates the population could be normal
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-66
No outliers.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-67
Step 1: We want to determine whether state quarters weigh more than traditional quarters:
H0: 1 = 2 versus H1: 1 > 2
Step 2: The level of significance is =0.05.
Step 3: The test statistic is
Solution
t0 5.7022 5.6494
0.04972
18 0.06892
16
2.53.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-68
Solution: Classical Approach
Step 4: This is a right-tailed test with =0.05. Since n1-1=17 and n2-1=15, we will use 15 degrees of freedom. The corresponding critical value is t0.05=1.753.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-69
Step 5: Since the test statistic, t0=2.53 is greater than the critical value t.05=1.753, we reject the null hypothesis.
Solution: Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-70
Step 4: Because this is a right-tailed test, the P-value is the area under the t-distribution to the right of the test statistic t0=2.53. That is, P-value = P(t > 2.53) ≈ 0.01.
Solution: P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-71
Step 5: Since the P-value is less than the level of significance =0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
Solution: P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-72
Step 6: There is sufficient evidence at the =0.05 level to conclude that the state quarters weigh more than the traditional quarters.
Solution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-73
NOTE: The degrees of freedom used to determine the critical value in the last example are conservative. Results that are more accurate can be obtained by using the following degrees of freedom:
df
s12
n1
s2
2
n2
2
s12
n1
2
n1 1
s22
n2
2
n2 1
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-74
Objective 3
• Construct and Interpret Confidence Intervals Regarding the Difference of Two Independent Means
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-75
A simple random sample of size n1 is taken from a population with unknown mean 1 and unknown standard deviation 1. Also, a simple random sample of size n2 is taken from a population with unknown mean 2 and unknown standard deviation 2. If the two populations are normally distributed or the sample sizes are sufficiently large (n1≥30 and n2≥30), a (1-)100% confidence interval about 1 - 2 is given by
Lower bound:
Upper bound:
Constructing a (1-) 100% ConfidenceInterval for the Difference of Two Means
x 1 x 2 t2
s1
2
n1
s2
2
n2
x 1 x 2 t2
s1
2
n1
s2
2
n2
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-76
Construct a 95% confidence interval about the difference between the population mean weight of a “state” quarter versus the population mean weight of a “traditional” quarter.
Parallel Example 3: Constructing a Confidence Interval for the Difference of Two Means
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-77
• We have already verified that the populations are approximately normal and that there are no outliers.
• Recall = 5.702, s1 = 0.0497, =5.6494 and s2 = 0.0689.
• From Table VI with = 0.05 and 15 degrees of freedom, we find t/2 = 2.131.
Solution
x 1
x 2
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-78
Thus,
• Lower bound =
• Upper bound =
Solution
5.702 5.649 2.1310.04972
18
0.06892
160.0086
5.702 5.649 2.1310.04972
18
0.06892
160.0974
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-79
We are 95% confident that the mean weight of the “state” quarters is between 0.0086 and 0.0974 ounces more than the mean weight of the “traditional” quarters. Since the confidence interval does not contain 0, we conclude that the “state” quarters weigh more than the “traditional” quarters.
Solution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-80
When the population variances are assumed to be equal, the pooled t-statistic can be used to test for a difference in means for two independent samples. The pooled t-statistic is computed by finding a weighted average of the sample variances and using this average in the computation of the test statistic.
• The advantage to this test statistic is that it exactly follows Student’s t-distribution with n1+n2-2 degrees of freedom.
• The disadvantage to this test statistic is that it requires that the population variances be equal.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
Section
Inference about Two Population Proportions
11.3
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-82
Objectives
1. Test hypotheses regarding two population proportions
2. Construct and interpret confidence intervals for the difference between two population proportions
3. Use McNemar’s Test to compare two proportions from matched-pairs data
4. Determine the sample size necessary for estimating the difference between two population proportions within a specified margin of error.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-83
Suppose that a simple random sample of size n1 is taken from a
population where x1 of the individuals have a specified characteristic,
and a simple random sample of size n2 is independently taken from a
different population where x2 of the individuals have a specified
characteristic. The sampling distribution of , where
and , is approximately normal, with mean
and standard deviation
provided that and .
Sampling Distribution of the Difference between Two Proportions
ˆ p 1 ˆ p 2
ˆ p 1 x1 n1
ˆ p 1 ˆ p 2p1 p2
ˆ p 2 x2 n2
ˆ p 1 ˆ p 2
p1 1 p1 n1
p2 1 p2
n2
n1ˆ p 1 1 ˆ p 1 10
n2ˆ p 2 1 ˆ p 2 10
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-84
The standardized version of is then written as
which has an approximate standard normal distribution.
Sampling Distribution of the Difference between Two Proportions
ˆ p 1 ˆ p 2
Z ˆ p 1 ˆ p 2 p1 p2
p1 1 p1 n1
p2 1 p2
n2
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-85
Objective 1
• Test Hypotheses Regarding Two Population Proportions
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-86
The best point estimate of p is called the pooled estimate of p, denoted , where
Test statistic for Comparing Two Population Proportions
ˆ p
ˆ p x1 x2
n1 n2
z0 ˆ p 1 ˆ p 2 ˆ p 1 ˆ p 2
ˆ p 1 ˆ p 2
ˆ p 1 ˆ p 1
n1
1
n2
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-87
To test hypotheses regarding two population proportions, p1 and p2, we can use the steps that follow, provided that:
1. the samples are independently obtained using simple random sampling,
2. and and
3. n1 ≤ 0.05N1 and n2 ≤ 0.05N2 (the sample size is no more than 5% of the population size); this requirement ensures the independence necessary for a binomial experiment.
Hypothesis Test Regarding the Differencebetween Two Population Proportions
n1ˆ p 1 1 ˆ p 1 10
n2ˆ p 2 1 ˆ p 2 10,
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-88
Step 1: Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. The hypotheses can be structured in one of three ways:
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-89
Step 2: Select a level of significance, , based on the seriousness of making a Type I error.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-90
Step 3: Compute the test statistic
where
z0 ˆ p 1 ˆ p 2
ˆ p 1 ˆ p 1
n1
1
n2
ˆ p x1 x2
n1 n2
.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-91
Step 4: Use Table V to determine the criticalvalue.
Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-92
Classical Approach
(critical value)
Two-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-93
Classical Approach
(critical value)
Left-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-94
Classical Approach
(critical value)
Right-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-95
Step 5: Compare the critical value with the test statistic:
Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-96
Step 4: Use Table V to estimate the P-value..
P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-97
P-Value Approach
Two-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-98
P-Value Approach
Left-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved 11-99
P-Value Approach
Right-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-100
Step 5: If P-value < , reject the null hypothesis.
P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-101
Step 6: State the conclusion.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-102
An economist believes that the percentage of urban households with Internet access is greater than the percentage of rural households with Internet access. He obtains a random sample of 800 urban households and finds that 338 of them have Internet access. He obtains a random sample of 750 rural households and finds that 292 of them have Internet access. Test the economist’s claim at the =0.05 level of significance.
Parallel Example 1: Testing Hypotheses Regarding Two Population Proportions
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-103
We must first verify that the requirements are satisfied:
– The samples are simple random samples that were obtained independently.
– x1=338, n1=800, x2=292 and n2=750, so
3. The sample sizes are less than 5% of the population size.
Solution
ˆ p 1 338
8000.4225 and ˆ p 2
292
7500.3893. Thus,
n1ˆ p 1 1 ˆ p 1 800(0.4225)(1 0.4225) 195.195 10
n2ˆ p 2 1 ˆ p 2 750(0.3893)(1 0.3893) 178.309 10
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-104
Step 1: We want to determine whether the percentage of urban households with Internet access is greater than the percentage of rural households with Internet access. So,
H0: p1 = p2 versus H1: p1 > p2
or, equivalently,
H0: p1 - p2=0 versus H1: p1 - p2 > 0
Step 2: The level of significance is = 0.05.
Solution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-105
Step 3: The pooled estimate of is:
The test statistic is:
Solution
z0 0.4225 0.3893
0.4065 1 0.4065 1
800 1
750
1.33.
ˆ p
ˆ p x1 x2
n1 n2
338 292
800 7500.4065.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-106
Step 4: This is a right-tailed test with =0.05. The critical value is z0.05=1.645.
Solution: Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-107
Step 5: Since the test statistic, z0=1.33 is less than the critical value z.05=1.645, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Solution: Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-108
Step 4: Because this is a right-tailed test, the P-value is the area under the normal to the right of the test statistic z0=1.33. That is, P-value = P(Z > 1.33) ≈ 0.09.
Solution: P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-109
Step 5: Since the P-value is greater than the level of significance =0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Solution: P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-110
Step 6: There is insufficient evidence at the =0.05 level to conclude that the percentage of urban households with Internet access is greater than the percentage of rural households with Internet access.
Solution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-111
Objective 2
• Construct and Interpret Confidence Intervals for the Difference between Two Population Proportions
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-112
To construct a (1-)100% confidence interval for the difference between two population proportions, the following requirements must be satisfied:
1. the samples are obtained independently using simple random sampling,
2. , and
3. n1 ≤ 0.05N1 and n2 ≤ 0.05N2 (the sample size is no more than 5% of the population size); this requirement ensures the independence necessary for a binomial experiment.
Constructing a (1-) 100% Confidence Interval for the Difference between Two
Population Proportions
n1ˆ p 1 1 ˆ p 1 10
n2ˆ p 2 1 ˆ p 2 10
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-113
Provided that these requirements are met, a (1-)100% confidence interval for p1-p2 is given by
Lower bound:
Upper bound:
ˆ p 1 ˆ p 2 z2
ˆ p 1 1 ˆ p 1
n1
ˆ p 2 1 ˆ p 2
n2
ˆ p 1 ˆ p 2 z2
ˆ p 1 1 ˆ p 1
n1
ˆ p 2 1 ˆ p 2
n2
Constructing a (1-) 100% Confidence Interval for the Difference between Two
Population Proportions
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-114
An economist obtains a random sample of 800 urban households and finds that 338 of them have Internet access. He obtains a random sample of 750 rural households and finds that 292 of them have Internet access. Find a 99% confidence interval for the difference between the proportion of urban households that have Internet access and the proportion of rural households that have Internet access.
Parallel Example 3: Constructing a Confidence Interval for the Difference between Two Population Proportions
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-115
We have already verified the requirements for constructing a confidence interval for the difference between two population proportions in the previous example.
Recall
Solution
ˆ p 1 338
8000.4225 and ˆ p 2
292
7500.3893.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-116
Thus,
Lower bound =
Upper bound =
Solution
0.4225 0.3893
2.5750.4225(1 0.4225)
800
0.3893(1 0.3893)
750 0.0310
0.4225 0.3893
2.5750.4225(1 0.4225)
800
0.3893(1 0.3893)
7500.0974
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-117
We are 99% confident that the difference between the proportion of urban households that have Internet access and the proportion of rural households that have Internet access is between -0.03 and 0.10. Since the confidence interval contains 0, we are unable to conclude that the proportion of urban households with Internet access is greater than the proportion of rural households with Internet access.
Solution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-118
Objective 3
• Use McNemar’s Test to Compare Two Proportions from Matched-Pairs Data
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-119
McNemar’s Test is a test that can be used to compare two proportions with matched-pairs data (i.e., dependent samples)
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-120
Testing a Hypothesis Regarding the Difference of Two Population
Proportions: Dependent Samples
To test hypotheses regarding two population proportionsp1 and p2, where the samples are dependent, arrange thedata in a contingency table as follows:
Treatment A
Treatment B
Success Failure
Success f11 f12
Failure f21 f22
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-121
Testing a Hypothesis Regarding the Difference of Two Population
Proportions: Dependent Samples
We can use the steps that follow provided that:1. the samples are dependent and are obtained
randomly and2. the total number of observations where the
outcomes differ must be greater than or equal to 10.That is, f12 + f21 ≥ 10.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-122
Step 1: Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.
H0: the proportions between the two populations are equal (p1 =
p2)
H1: the proportions between the two populations differ (p1 ≠ p2)
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-123
Step 2: Select a level of significance, , based on the seriousness of making a Type I error.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-124
Step 3: Compute the test statistic
z0 f12 f21 1
f12 f21
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-125
Step 4: Use Table V to determine the criticalvalue. This is a two tailed test. However, z0 is always positive, so we only need to find the right critical value z/2.
Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-126
Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-127
Step 5: If z0 > z/2, reject the null hypothesis.
Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-128
Step 4: Use Table V to determine the P-value..Because z0 is always positive, we find the area to the right of z0 and then double this area (since this is a two-tailed test).
P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-129
P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-130
Step 5: If P-value < , reject the null hypothesis.
P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-131
Step 6: State the conclusion.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-132
A recent General Social Survey asked the following two questions of a random sample of 1483 adult Americans under the hypothetical scenario that the government suspected that a terrorist act was about to happen:
• Do you believe the authorities should have the right to tap people’s telephone conversations?
• Do you believe the authorities should have the right to detain people for as long as they want without putting them on trial?
Parallel Example 4: Analyzing the Difference of Two Proportions from Matched-Pairs Data
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-133
The results of the survey are shown below:
Do the proportions who agree with each scenario differ significantly? Use the =0.05 level of significance.
Parallel Example 4: Analyzing the Difference of Two Proportions from Matched-Pairs Data
Detain
Tap
Phone
Agree Disagree
Agree 572 237
Disagree 224 450
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-134
The sample proportion of individuals who believe that the
authorities should be able to tap phones is
.
The sample proportion of individuals who believe that
the authorities should have the right to detain people is
. We want to
determine whether the difference in sample
proportions is due to sampling error or to the fact that
the population proportions differ.
Solution
ˆ p T 572 237
14830.5455
ˆ p D 572 224
14830.5367
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-135
The samples are dependent and were obtained randomly. The total number of individuals who agree with one scenario, but disagree with the other is 237+224=461, which is greater than 10. We can proceed with McNemar’s Test.
Step 1: The hypotheses are as follows
H0: the proportions between the two populations are equal (pT = pD)
H1: the proportions between the two populations differ (pT ≠ pD)
Step 2: The level of significance is = 0.05.
Solution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-136
Step 3: The test statistic is:
Solution
z0 224 237 1
237 2240.56
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-137
Step 4: The critical value with an =0.05 level of significance is z0.025=1.96.
Solution: Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-138
Step 5: Since the test statistic, z0=0.56 is less than the critical value z.025=1.96, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Solution: Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-139
Step 4: The P-value is two times the area under the normal curve to the right of the test statistic z0=0.56. That is, P-value = 2*P(Z > 0.56) ≈ 0.5754.
Solution: P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-140
Step 5: Since the P-value is greater than the level of significance =0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Solution: P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-141
Step 6: There is insufficient evidence at the =0.05 level to conclude that there is a difference in the proportion of adult Americans who believe it is okay to phone tap versus detaining people for as long as they want without putting them on trial in the event that the government believed a terrorist plot was about to happen.
Solution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-142
Objective 4
• Determine the Sample Size Necessary for Estimating the Difference between Two Population Proportions within a Specified Margin of Error
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-143
Sample Size for Estimating p1-p2
The sample size required to obtain a (1-)100% confidence interval with a margin of error, E, is givenby
rounded up to the next integer, if prior estimates of p1
and p2, , are available. If prior estimates ofp1 and p2 are unavailable, the sample size is
rounded up to the next integer.
n n1 n2 ˆ p 1 1 ˆ p 1 ˆ p 2 1 ˆ p 2 z 2
E
2
ˆ p 1 and ˆ p 2
n n1 n2 0.5z 2
E
2
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-144
A doctor wants to estimate the difference in the proportion of 15-19 year old mothers that received prenatal care and the proportion of 30-34 year old mothers that received prenatal care. What sample size should be obtained if she wished the estimate to be within 2 percentage points with 95% confidence assuming:
a) she uses the results of the National Vital Statistics Report results in which 98% of the 15-19 year old mothers received prenatal care and 99.2% of 30-34 year old mothers received prenatal care.
b) she does not use any prior estimates.
Parallel Example 5: Determining Sample Size
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-145
We have E=0.02 and z/2=z0.025=1.96.
a) Letting ,
The doctor must sample 265 randomly selected 15-19 year old mothers and 265 randomly selected 30-34 year old mothers.
Solution
ˆ p 1 0.98 and ˆ p 2 0.992
n1 n2 0.98(1 0.98) 0.992(1 0.992) 1.96
0.02
2
264.5
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-146
b) Without prior estimates of p1 and p2, the sample size is
The doctor must sample 4802 randomly selected 15-19 year old mothers and 4802 randomly selected 30-34 year old mothers. Note that having prior estimates of p1 and p2 reduces the number of mothers that need to be surveyed.
Solution
n1 n2 0.51.96
0.02
2
4802
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
Section
Inference about Two Population Standard Deviations
11.4
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-148
Objectives
1. Find critical values of the F-distribution
2. Test hypotheses regarding two population standard deviations
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-149
Objective 1
• Find Critical Values of the F-distribution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-150
Requirements for Testing Claims Regarding Two Population Standard
Deviations
1. The samples are independent simple random samples.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-151
Requirements for Testing Claims Regarding Two Population Standard
Deviations
1. The samples are independent simple random samples.2. The populations from which the samples are drawn are normally distributed.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-152
CAUTION!
If the populations from which the samples are drawnare not normal, do not use the inferential procedures
discussed in this section.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-153
Notation Used When Comparing Two Population Standard Deviations
12
: Variance for population 1
: Variance for population 2
: Sample variance for population 1
: Sample variance for population 2
n1 : Sample size for population 1
n2 : Sample size for population 2
22
s12
s22
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-154
Fisher's F-distribution
If and and are sample variances fromindependent simple random samples of size n1 andn2, respectively, drawn from normal populations, then
follows the F-distribution with n1-1 degrees offreedom in the numerator and n2-1 degrees of freedom in the denominator.
12 2
2
s12
s22
F s1
2
s22
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-155
Characteristics of the F-distribution
1. It is not symmetric. The F-distribution is skewed right.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-156
Characteristics of the F-distribution
1. It is not symmetric. The F-distribution is skewed right.2. The shape of the F-distribution depends upon the degrees of freedom in the numerator and denominator. This is similar to the 2 distribution and Student’s t-distribution, whose shapes depend upon their degrees of freedom.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-157
Characteristics of the F-distribution
1. It is not symmetric. The F-distribution is skewed right.2. The shape of the F-distribution depends upon the degrees of freedom in the numerator and denominator. This is similar to the distribution and Student’s t-distribution, whose shape depends upon their degrees of freedom.3. The total area under the curve is 1.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-158
Characteristics of the F-distribution
1. It is not symmetric. The F-distribution is skewed right.2. The shape of the F-distribution depends upon the degrees of freedom in the numerator and denominator. This is similar to the distribution and Student’s t-distribution, whose shape depends upon their degrees of freedom.3. The total area under the curve is 1.4. The values of F are always greater than or equal to zero.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-159
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-160
is the critical F with n1 – 1 degrees of freedom in the numerator and n2 – 1 degrees of freedom in the denominator and an area of to the right of the critical F.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-161
To find the critical F with an area of α to the left, use the following:
F1 ,n1 1,n2 1 1
F,n2 1,n1 1
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-162
Find the critical F-value:
a) for a right-tailed test with =0.1, degrees of freedom in the numerator = 8 and degrees of freedom in the denominator = 4.
b) for a two-tailed test with =0.05, degrees of freedom in the numerator = 20 and degrees of freedom in the denominator = 15.
Parallel Example 1: Finding Critical Values for the F-distribution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-163
a) F0.1,8,4 = 3.95
b) F.025,20,15 = 2.76; = 0.39
Solution
F.975,20,15 1
F.025,15,20
1
2.57
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-164
NOTE:
If the number of degrees of freedom is not found in the table, we follow the practice of choosing the degrees of freedom closest to that desired. If the degrees of freedom is exactly between two values, find the mean of the values.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-165
Objective 2
• Test Hypotheses Regarding Two Population Standard Deviations
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-166
To test hypotheses regarding two population standard deviations, 1 and 2, we can use the following steps, provided that
1. the samples are obtained using simple random sampling,
2. the sample data are independent, and
3. the populations from which the samples are drawn are normally distributed.
Test Hypotheses Regarding Two Population Standard Deviations
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-167
Step 1: Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. The hypotheses can be structured in one of three ways:
Two-Tailed Left-Tailed Right-Tailed
H0: 1 = 2 H0: 1 = 2 H0: 1 = 2
H1: 1 ≠ 2 H1: 1 < 2 H1: 1 > 2
Note: 1 is the population standard deviation for population 1 and 2 is the population standard deviation for population 2.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-168
Step 2: Select a level of significance, , based on the seriousness of making a Type I error.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-169
Step 3: Compute the test statistic
which follows Fisher’s F-distribution with n1-1 degrees of freedom in the numerator and n2-1 degrees of freedom in the denominator.
F0 s1
2
s22
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-170
Step 4: Use Table VIII to determine the criticalvalue(s) using n1-1 degrees of freedom in the numerator and n2-1 degrees of freedom in the denominator.
Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-171
Classical Approach
(critical value)
Two-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-172
Classical Approach
(critical value)
Left-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-173
Classical Approach
(critical value)
Right-Tailed
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-174
Step 5: Compare the critical value with the test statistic:
Classical Approach
Two-Tailed Left-Tailed Right-Tailed
If or , reject the null hypothesis.
If , reject the null hypothesis.
If , reject the null hypothesis.
F0 F1 2,n1 1,n2 1
F0 F 2,n1 1,n2 1
F0 F1 ,n1 1,n2 1
F0 F,n1 1,n2 1
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-175
Step 4: Use technology to determine the P-value.
P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-176
Step 5: If P-value < , reject the null hypothesis.
P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-177
Step 6: State the conclusion.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-178
CAUTION!
The procedures just presented are not robust,minor departures from normality will adversely affect the results of the test. Therefore, the test should be used only when the requirement of normality has been verified.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-179
A researcher wanted to know whether “state” quarters had a standard deviation weight that is less than “traditional” quarters. He randomly selected 18 “state” quarters and 16 “traditional” quarters, weighed each of them and obtained the data on the next slide. A normal probability plot indicates that the sample data could come from a population that is normal. Test the researcher’s claim at the = 0.05 level of significance.
Parallel Example 2: Testing Hypotheses Regarding Two Population Standard Deviations
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-180
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-181
Step 1: The researcher wants to know if “state” quarters have a standard deviation weight that is less than “traditional” quarters. Thus
H0: 1= 2 versus H1: 1< 2
This is a left-tailed test.
Step 2: The level of significance is = 0.05.
Solution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-182
Step 3: The standard deviation of “state” quarters was found to be 0.0497 and the standard deviation of “traditional” quarters was found to be 0.0689. The test statistic is then
Solution
F0 0.04972
0.06892 0.52
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-183
Step 4: Since this is a left-tailed test, we determine the critical value at the 1- = 1-0.05 = 0.95 level of significance with n1-1=18-1=17 degrees of freedom in the numerator and n2-1=16-1=15 degrees of freedom in the denominator. Thus,
Note: we used the table value F0.05,15,15 for the above calculation since this is the closest to the required degrees of freedom available from Table VIII.
Solution: Classical Approach
F.95,17,15 1
F.05,15,17
1
2.400.42.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-184
Step 5: Since the test statistic F0= 0.52 is greater than the critical value F0.95,17,15=0.42, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Solution: Classical Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-185
Step 4: Using technology, we find that the P-value is 0.097. If the statement in the null hypothesis were true, we would expect to get the results obtained about 10 out of 100 times. This is not very unusual.
Solution: P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-186
Step 5: Since the P-value is greater than the level of significance, = 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Solution: P-Value Approach
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-187
Step 6: There is not enough evidence to conclude that the standard deviation of weight is less for “state” quarters than it is for “traditional” quarters at the = 0.05 level of significance.
Solution
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
Section
Putting It Together: Which Method Do I Use?
11.5
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-189
Objectives
1. Determine the appropriate hypothesis test to perform
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-190
Objective 1
• Determine the Appropriate Hypothesis Test to Perform
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-191
What parameter is addressed in the hypothesis?
• Proportion, p• or 2
• Mean,
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-192
Proportion, p
Is the sampling Dependent or Independent?
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-193
Proportion, p
Dependent samples:Provided the samples are obtained randomly and the total number of observations where the outcomes differ is at least 10, use the normal distribution with
z0 f12 f21 1
f12 f21
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-194
Proportion, p
Independent samples:Provided for each sample and the sample size is no more than 5% of the populationsize, use the normal distribution with
where
nˆ p 1 ˆ p 10
z0 ˆ p 1 ˆ p 2
ˆ p 1 ˆ p 1n1
1n2
ˆ p x1 x2
n1 n2
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-195
or 2
Provided the data are normally distributed, use the F-distribution with
F0 s1
2
s22
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-196
Mean,
Is the sampling Dependent or Independent?
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-197
Mean,
Dependent samples:Provided each sample size is greater than 30 or the differences come from a population that is normally distributed, use Student’s t-distributionwith n-1 degrees of freedom with
t0 d d
sd
n
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved
11-198
Mean,
Independent samples:Provided each sample size is greater than 30 or eachpopulation is normally distributed, use Student’st-distribution
t0 x 1 x 2 1 2
s12
n1
s22
n2
Recommended