Weaving digital information into physical space

  • View
    1.713

  • Download
    1

  • Category

    Design

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Slides from my UX Australia 2011 talk on integrating digital information into physical environments. In the talk I outlined how this field has evolved in the past decades. The second half of the talk discussed specific challenges in the context of the Neighbourhood Scoreboards project. For more information visit the project website: http://neighbourhoodscoreboards.com/ More information about the talk is available from the UX Australia website: http://uxaustralia.com.au/conference-2011/weaving-digital-information-into-physical-space

Citation preview

Weaving digital information into physical space:

Martin Tomitsch | The University of Sydney

New frontiers for prototyping experiences

Balance privacy and clarity (low-res vs high-res)

Balance privacy and clarity (low-res vs high-res)

Designing for a dynamic architectural fabric

Balance privacy and clarity (low-res vs high-res)Designing for a dynamic architectural fabric

Prototyping as a form of evaluation

cityofsound.com

Blackboard displaymoods –!blackboard customization

Blackboard displaymoods – filling in information

Blackboard displaylocation/shape

Blackboard displaylocation/shape

Blackboard display

Blackboard display

THAN YESTERDAY

MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 29

30

31

28

2,4

1. change in %change energy usage of household in % compared to the day before.

1

THAN YESTERDAY

MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 29

30

31

28

... and 5 % more than LASt WEEK2,4

2. rankingranking based on percentage of change.updated 3 times a day

2

THAN YESTERDAY

MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 29

30

31

28

neighbourhood

... and 5 % more than LASt WEEK

house

2,49 a m

3. graph3a. graph for house3b. graph for neighbourhood avergae

3

THAN YESTERDAY

MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 29

30

31

28

neighbourhood

... and 5 % more than LASt WEEK

house

2,49 a m

4. barresume of behaviour

– relative system– not compared to neighbourhood – only compared to own previous behaviour

4

-3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3

energy usage

day 1: everyone starts with 0

day 2: less usage = +

1

day 3: no change in usage – but theday before w

as an improvem

ent soit‘s still considered +

1

day 4: still no changeno change on a +

1 level = +

13 positive days in a row

(3x +1) =

+2

day 5: less usage = second

crown / +

2

day 6: no change or improvem

ent – third day in a row

= +

3

day 7: more usage

= jum

ps to -1 (not to +

2)

day 8: more usage

= again -1

day 9: same usage on a -1 level =

again -13 tim

es -1 = -2

day 10: same usage on the -2 level =

again -2

day 11: same usage on a -2 level =

again -23 tim

es -2 = -3

-3-2-10 +1 +2 +3+1 +2 -1 -2 +1

day 12: less usage, jumps to +

1(not to -2)

THAN YESTERDAY

MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 29

30

31

28

neighbourhood

... and 5 % more than LASt WEEK

house

2,49 a m

THAN YESTERDAY

MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 29

30

31

28

neighbourhood

... and 5 % more than LASt WEEK

house

2,49 a m

THAN YESTERDAY

MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 29

30

31

28

house

2,49 a m

and 5 % more thanLAStWEEK

NBHDhouse

alternative

THAN YESTERDAY

MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 29

30

31

28

neighbourhood

... and 5 % more than LASt WEEK

house

2,49 a mTHAN YESTERDAY

MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 29

30

31

28

house

2,49 a m

and 5 % more thanLAStWEEK

NBHDhouse

www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.com

www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.com

www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.com

www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.com

no display(C)

private display only (B)

public & private display (A)

50 m

www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.com

Change after the installation in week 4: Public display - 13.2%Commercial energy monitor -12.1%No display - no change

www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.com

Average change per week over 7 weeks: Public display - 2.5%Commercial energy monitor -1%No display - 0.5%

www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.com

Balance privacy and clarity

Balance privacy and clarity

THAN YESTERDAY

MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 29

30

31

28

neighbourhood

... and 5 % more than LASt WEEK

house

2,49 a m

THAN YESTERDAY

MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 29

30

31

28

house

2,49 a m

and 5 % more thanLAStWEEK

NBHDhouse

Designing for a dynamic architectural fabric

alternative

THAN YESTERDAY

MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 29

30

31

28

neighbourhood

... and 5 % more than LASt WEEK

house

2,49 a mTHAN YESTERDAY

MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 29

30

31

28

house

2,49 a m

and 5 % more thanLAStWEEK

NBHDhouse

Designing for a dynamic architectural fabric

Prototyping as a form of evaluation

Prototyping as a form of evaluation

Prototyping as a form of evaluation

Prototyping as a form of evaluation

Prototyping as a form of evaluation

Balance privacy and clarity (low-res vs high-res)

Designing for a dynamic architectural fabricPrototyping as a form of evaluation

Image credits

Slide 03: ENIAC Computer – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Eniac.jpgSlide 04: ATTiny – http://www.flickr.com/photos/project-hal0/2322389540/ (Example taken from Mike Kuniavsky’s

book “Smart Things”)Slide 05: Xerox Star – http://catchrandom.blogspot.com/2010/05/first-computer-user-interface-1981.html Slide 07: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mac_fun/5328640028/sizes/l/in/photostream/Slide 08: Ambient Orb – http://www.ambientdevices.com/cat/images/greenorb_withchair.jpgSlide 09: Weather Toaster – http://infosthetics.com/archives/2005/12/ambient_weather_toaster_visualization.html Slide 10: http://www.ambientdevices.comSlide 13: Augmented City (Keiichi Matsuda) – http://www.keiichimatsuda.com/augmentedcity.php Slide 14: Honours project by Mandy Leung @ Sydney Uni (photo by Josh Mcinerheney) Slide 19: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jamesm/2053805960/Slide 20: Home Joule (Ambient Devices)Slide 21: Wattson – http://www.diykyoto.com/uk/wattson/about Slide 22: Honours project by Silje Johansen @ Sydney UniSlide 23: Sketch by Dan Hill (cityofsound.com)Slide 70: Real Ideal concept – http://depts.washington.edu/ixd/blog/2009/12/20/intel-envisioning-interactions-in-the-

home-of-the-future/ Slide 71: Mockup by Hanley Weng (Advanced Interaction Design class, 2011 @ Sydney Uni)Slide 72: http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/over-the-top-web-sites.html

Andrew Vande MoereMonika HoinkisElmar TrefzSilje Johansen Allison JonesJosh McinerheneyDamien Kwan

Credits & thanks: Public feedback display sketches and mockups by Monika Hoinkis; Photos by Josh Mcinerheney, Nikash Singh, Martin Tomitsch, Elmar Trefz; Dan Hill for inspiration and input during the initial project phase;Timo Arnall for using dashed lines to show hidden information.

The project was funded by the Faculty of Architecture, Design & Planning – Sustainability Cluster.

Martin Tomitsch@martintom

www.neighbourhoodscoreboards.com

The University of SydneyDesign Lab

Recommended