Upload
artur-serra
View
71
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Lab,A possible world in 2050
Artur Serra i2cat
Contribution to FuturiumBarcelona, October 29th, 2013
Index.
1. Upon the Net.
2.The Lab, the new hypothesis
3.Universal Innovation Systems?
4. Citizens’ labs.
5. Learning to innovate
Possible future scenarios1. Old structures reversing the new
infrastructure: - The trustification of the Net. (Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple….-Government control of the Net (NSA, China,…)
2. New structures completing the new infrastructure: Birth to new cooperative and innovative structures!!: Labs for everybody and everywhere
“The Lab” hypothesis
Is it possible the opening of the innovation systems to everyone,
everywhere?
Is it possible to create a inter-universal innovation system, open
and coopertive like Internet? 8
European universal healtcare systems
Covering 100% of population
IntermediateClinics
Primary Health Centers
SpeciallizedHospitals
Comparing with Innovation Systems
“The triple helix”Universities, company labs, Federal labs. ….An elite and minority system.
?
A new innovation models:The Fourth Helix
http://tampub.uta.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/65758/978-951-44-8209-0.pdf?sequence=1
Current systemsof learning and innovation
Learning systems
InnovatinoSystems
First , you all learn Then, some of you innovate
Longlife learning-to-innovate process
You learn to innovateBasic level You learn to innovate
Intermediate level
You learn to innovateAdvanced level
The new skills beyond OECD PISA
“The fundamental basis of the system is fatally flawed”, says Linda Darling-Hammond, a professor of education at Stanford and founding director of the National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. “In 1970 the top three skills required by the Fortune 500 were the three Rs: reading, writing, and arithmetic. In 1999 the top three skills in demand were teamwork, problem-solving, and interpersonal skills. We need schools that are developing these skills.” How a Radical New Teaching Method Could Unleash a Generation of Geniuses, )http://www.wired.com/business/2013/10/free-thinkers/
The third general purpose mental tool”
““ The most valuable acquisitions in a scientific or technical
education are the general-purpose mental tools which remain serviceable for a lifetime. I rate natural language and mathematics as the most important of these tools, and computer science as a third”.
WHAT TO DO TILL THE COMPUTER SCIENTIST COMES* 1968
GEORGE E. FORSYTHE, Computer Science Department, Stanford University
The Quintivium: The language of innovation
a) Design ThinkingH. Simon, “The Sciences of Artificial” (1969).
CMU as design univ. (Serra 1990)
b) Computational Thinking. Jeannette Wing (CMU), (Scratch, MIT).
c) Social Innovation. (NESTA, UK).
e) Innovation as new citizen’s ethics of liberty and responsability. (Citilab)
Who are the new innovators/teachers?
The moment of a new kind of scientists of artificial:
-Technoanthropologists
-Technoeconomists
-Technopedagogians.
Like mathematicians and physicists became the engineers of “computer technology”, and the biologists became the engineers of biotechnology, now social scientists will become the engineers of new social, educational, economic structures…,
New Methodologies for learning to innovate
Dolors Solano, Seniorlab
Project based learningRicardo Torres, Digital Horchad
Personal learning environmentJordi Delgado, Edutech
Computational thinking (Scratch)Laia Sanchez:
Social Media literacyAstrid Lubsen
User-driven design
Los pedagogos de los procesos de innovación
Los living labs necesitamos cientificos socialesque se hagan diseñadores:
-Innovacion social……Tecnoantropologos-Innovacion educativa…Tecnopedagogos-Innovacion económica…Tecnoempresarios
Como hace décadas hicieron los matemáticos Y físicos que se hicieron diseñadores de losOrdenadores y los lenguajes de programación