95
What Makes a Stream Healthy? Bed stability & diversity Sediment transport balance In-stream habitat & flow diversity Bank stability (native plant roots) Riparian buffer (streamside forest) Active floodplain

Rc101 day3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Rc101 day3

What Makes a Stream Healthy?

• Bed stability & diversity

• Sediment transport balance

• In-stream habitat & flow diversity

• Bank stability (native plant roots)

• Riparian buffer (streamside forest)

• Active floodplain

Page 2: Rc101 day3

Bed Stability & Diversity• Appropriate size sediments

to resist shear stress

• Riffle/Pool sequences in alluvial streams

• Step/Pool sequences in high-gradient streams

Photo Credit: Eve Brantley, Auburn University

Page 3: Rc101 day3

Sediment Transport Balance• Minor erosion & deposition

• Alluvial bars and benches

• Sufficient stream power to avoid aggradation

Page 4: Rc101 day3

PoolRoots Wood

Leaf Pack

RiffleRocks

In-stream Habitat & Flow Diversity

Plants

Overhanging Bank

Page 5: Rc101 day3

Bank Stability• Dense native

plant roots

• Low banks with low stress

Page 6: Rc101 day3

Riparian Buffer (Streamside Forest)• Diverse native plants

• Food and shade

Page 7: Rc101 day3

Active Floodplain• Regular (every year) flooding to relieve stress

• Riparian wetlands

• Stormwater retention & treatment

Page 8: Rc101 day3

What is a “Stable” Stream?“Graded” Stream: Condition of “balance between erosion and

deposition attained by mature rivers” (Davis, 1902)

“Dynamic Equilibrium”: Stream form & character unchanged while continuous inflow of water/sediment (Strahler, 1957)

“Equilibrium Controlling Factors”: Width, depth, velocity, slope, discharge, sediment size, sediment concentration, channel roughness (Leopold, 1964)

“Regime Channels”: Some erosion and deposition but no net change in dimension, pattern, and profile (Hey, 1997)

“Stream Channel Stability”: ability of a stream, over time, in the present climate, to transport the sediment and flows produced by its watershed in such a manner that the stream maintains its dimension, pattern, and profile without either aggrading or degrading (Rosgen, 1996)

Page 9: Rc101 day3

Lane’s Stream Balance Relationship

Page 10: Rc101 day3

Causes of Instability

• Increase runoff • Increase slope • Changes in sediment load• Loss of riparian buffer• Floodplain filling• Instream modification

Page 11: Rc101 day3

Increase Runoff: Land Use Changes

Page 12: Rc101 day3

Development Impacts on the Water Cycle

50%

10%

15%55%

Courtesy NEMO, Univ. of CT

Page 13: Rc101 day3

Impervious Surfaces Across the Landscape

Roads

Parking

Buildings

Sidewalks

Driveways

Center for Watershed Protection

Page 14: Rc101 day3

The Science of Stormwater…

More Runoff

Arriving Faster

NEMO

Page 15: Rc101 day3

Hydrologic Responses to Urbanization

1. Increased discharge

2. Increased peak discharge

3. Increased velocities

4. Shorter time to peak flow

5. More frequent bankfull events

6. Increased flooding

7. Lower baseflow

8. Less ground water recharge

Page 16: Rc101 day3
Page 17: Rc101 day3
Page 18: Rc101 day3
Page 19: Rc101 day3
Page 20: Rc101 day3

Increase Slope

• Channelization • Lower Reservoir

Water Surface• Dam Break• Geologic Uplift

Page 21: Rc101 day3

Simon Channel Evolution Model

Source:

Simon, 1989, USACE 1990

Page 22: Rc101 day3
Page 23: Rc101 day3
Page 24: Rc101 day3

Head Cut

Page 25: Rc101 day3
Page 26: Rc101 day3
Page 27: Rc101 day3
Page 28: Rc101 day3
Page 29: Rc101 day3
Page 30: Rc101 day3
Page 31: Rc101 day3
Page 32: Rc101 day3

VI

IV

V

III

I

Original Nickpoint

III

IIIIV

I

I

IIII

III

I

II

I

I

Page 33: Rc101 day3

G4c Alabama

Page 34: Rc101 day3

Changes in Sediment Load

• Development• Agriculture• Bank Erosion• Impoundments

Page 35: Rc101 day3
Page 36: Rc101 day3

Aggradation

Page 37: Rc101 day3
Page 38: Rc101 day3
Page 39: Rc101 day3
Page 40: Rc101 day3
Page 41: Rc101 day3

Mid-channel bar and transverse bar directing flow into a high bank causing erosion and slumping

Page 42: Rc101 day3

Debris Occurrence

Large Woody Debris Depends on

Riparian Stability Beaver Dams

Page 43: Rc101 day3

Woody debris

Page 44: Rc101 day3

Impoundments

Upstream:• Decrease

velocities• Deposition of fine

material• Loss of habitat

Downstream:• “Hungry water”• Change in flow

Page 45: Rc101 day3

Riparian Condition (Buffer)

Composition Density Potential

Page 46: Rc101 day3

Values of Vegetation

• Habitats• Water Quality• Bank Stability• Shade & Food

Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices, 10/98, by the Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (FISRWG)."

Page 47: Rc101 day3

Streamside Forests (also known as riparian buffers)

• Trees, shrubs, herbs, and grasses are critical to the health of streams

• Buffers are the first line of defense against the impacts of polluted runoff

• natural vegetation buffers are especially critical in urban areas

Page 48: Rc101 day3
Page 49: Rc101 day3
Page 50: Rc101 day3
Page 51: Rc101 day3

Altered States Due to Disturbance

Channelization Straightening Levees Hardening Mining

Page 52: Rc101 day3

Floodplain Filling

Page 53: Rc101 day3
Page 54: Rc101 day3

G4c Alabama

Page 55: Rc101 day3

Stream Channel Succession (WARSSS)

Page 56: Rc101 day3

Stream Channel Succession (WARSSS)

http://www.epa.gov/WARSSS/sedsource/successn.htm

Page 57: Rc101 day3

Stability Assessment

http://www.epa.gov/warsss/index.htm

Page 58: Rc101 day3

Entrenchment Ratio

Page 59: Rc101 day3

Lateral Stability

Meander Width Ratio Bank Erosion (BEHI)

Page 60: Rc101 day3

Meander Width Ratio

Wbkf Wblt

MWR = Wblt / Wbkf

Wbkf = Bankfull Width of Riffle Cross-Section

Wblt = Belt Width

Page 61: Rc101 day3

Bank ErosionMonitoring

Harris Reach, South Fork Mitchell River X-Sec 7+65

0

2

4

6

8

10

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36

Distance from Toe Pin (ft)

Ht

ab

ov

e T

oe

Pin

(ft

)

1/8/97

1/8/97

6/18/97

8/15/97

7/9/98

Page 62: Rc101 day3

Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI)

Page 63: Rc101 day3

Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI)

Page 64: Rc101 day3

Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI)

Page 65: Rc101 day3

Bankfull Stage: Water fills the active channel and begins to spread onto the floodplain

Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices. 1998. Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group.

Page 66: Rc101 day3
Page 67: Rc101 day3

Bank Height Ratio

Very Low

Page 68: Rc101 day3

Bank Height Ratio

Moderate

Page 69: Rc101 day3

Bank Height Ratio

Very High

Page 70: Rc101 day3
Page 71: Rc101 day3

Root Depth Ratio

Very Low BEHI

Page 72: Rc101 day3

Root Depth Ratio

Moderate BEHI

Page 73: Rc101 day3

Root Depth Ratio

Very High BEHI

Page 74: Rc101 day3
Page 75: Rc101 day3

Root Density

Very Low BEHI

Page 76: Rc101 day3

Root Density

Moderate

Page 77: Rc101 day3

Root Density

Very High BEHI

Page 78: Rc101 day3

Bank Angle (from horizontal)

Page 79: Rc101 day3

Bank Angle

Very Low

Page 80: Rc101 day3

Bank Angle

Moderate - High

Page 81: Rc101 day3

Bank Angle

Very High

Page 82: Rc101 day3
Page 83: Rc101 day3

Surface Protection

Very Low BEHI

Page 84: Rc101 day3

Surface Protection

Moderate

Page 85: Rc101 day3

Surface Protection

Very High BEHI

Page 86: Rc101 day3

Bank Materials

Extreme RiskHigh Risk

Very Low Risk

Page 87: Rc101 day3
Page 88: Rc101 day3
Page 89: Rc101 day3
Page 90: Rc101 day3

Near Bank Stress

Low

Page 91: Rc101 day3

Near Bank Stress

Moderate

Page 92: Rc101 day3

Near Bank Stress

High

Page 93: Rc101 day3

Near Bank Stress

Very High

Page 94: Rc101 day3
Page 95: Rc101 day3